weronika tancredi , olof torgersson department of applied it
DESCRIPTION
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 1 . An Example of an Application of the Semiotic Inspection Method in the Domain of Computerized Patient Record System. Weronika Tancredi , Olof Torgersson Department of Applied IT Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
An Example of an Application of the Semiotic Inspection Method in the Domain of Computerized
Patient Record SystemWeronika Tancredi, Olof Torgersson
Department of Applied ITChalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg
ESSIQ AB, Gothenburg, Sweden
Oral presentation at MedInfo2013, August 22 Copenhagen, Denmark
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 1
The System
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 2
A Closer Look• What?
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 3
Study Context• Computerized Patient Record System for dental care
– Widely used by public dental care in Sweden
• Major upgrade caused a lot of confusion
• Evaluation– Work place studies – University of Skövde– Expert evaluation – Chalmers
• Heuristic evaluation x 2• Enhanced cognitive walkthrough• Predictive use error analysis• Semiotic inspection method
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 4
Semiotic Engineering• Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, 2005
• Focus on signs and their meaning• Interface message from designer to user
– Designers communicate through the interface to users• Communicability
“Here is my understanding of who you are, what I’ve learned you want or need to do, in which preferred ways, and why. This is the system that I have therefore designed for you, and this is the way you can or should use it in order to fulfil a range of purposes that fall within this vision.”
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 5
Semiotic Engineering
• When users do not understand the message a communication breakdown takes place
You do not care about icons, so therefore I use only one
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 6
Semiotic Inspection Method• Analyze 3 types of signs
– (1) Metalinguistic signs– (2) Static signs– (3) Dynamic signs
• Contrastive comparison of results from 1-3– Identify problems & lack of consistency
• Summarize – describe the message– Conclusive appreciation of the quality of the
designer-to-user communication
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 7
Procedure• Observation• Scenario
– Anna is a fifty years old dentist who works in a bigger dental clinic…. Anna has many patients booked for each day and she needs to work quickly to be able to examine and treat the patient as well as to insert the data about the current and future treatment into the CPR system…
• Describe tasks to evaluate (10)– Opening the medical record of a specific patient.– Making a new health declaration.– Sending a referral to oral surgery.– …
• Repeated inspection of the signs in all parts
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 8
Sample Findings• Metalinguistic signs
– Busy professionals– Interest in adapting
the system– Extensive instructions
& lack of instructions– …
• Static signs– Irrelevant information– Lack of signifiers– …
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 9
Sample Findings• Dynamic signs
– Assumes users know what to do– No guidance– No indication of order– Lack of feedback– …
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 10
The Communication Message• Users are expected to have advanced digital skills and clinical
knowledge• Assumed order through tabs
– General– Additional info– …– Basic planning
• Some order in toolbars
• Overall inconsistent
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 11
Comparison
HE1 HE2 SIM ECW PUEA0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2426
33 33
9
Percentage of unique usability issues
Usability inspection method
Perc
enta
ge o
f ide
ntifi
ed u
sabi
lity
issu
es
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 12
Discussion• Wanted to show problems with flow and wayfinding
• Focus on 3 different types of signs– Helped to reflect on what text, icons etc actually
communicate– Clearly not consistent
• SIM includes manuals etc, interesting aspect• Large system
– Lots of data– Method could give more support
• More about overall quality than other methods but not enough
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 13
Thank you for your attention
Weronika [email protected]
Olof [email protected]
MedInfo2013 Olof Torgersson 14