western hemlock looper and forest disturbance in the ich...
TRANSCRIPT
Western Hemlock Looper and Forest Disturbance
in the ICH wk3 of the Robson Valley
Stage 2: The Effects of Western Hemlock Looper -
Report and Silviculture Recommendations
Aled Hoggett
Faculty of Forestry
University of British Columbia
March 15, 2000
2
Table of Contents
SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 4
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 6
METHODS.......................................................................................................................... 8
FIELD METHODS .................................................................................................................. 8
ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 11
CURRENT ECOSYSTEM CONDITIONS ........................................................................ 12
SITE.................................................................................................................................... 12
CURRENT STAND CONDITION............................................................................................. 13
DIAMETER ...........................................................................................................................13
VOLUME AND BASAL AREA ..................................................................................................17
HEIGHT................................................................................................................................18
DECAY.................................................................................................................................20
CROWN CONDITION..............................................................................................................22
OTHER TREE CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................24
DEAD MATERIAL..................................................................................................................28
TREE REGENERATION ........................................................................................................ 31
OTHER ECOSYSTEM COMPONENTS .................................................................................... 33
UNDERSTOREY VEGETATION ................................................................................................33
FOREST FLOOR AND CHARCOAL............................................................................................36
ANALYSIS OF WITHIN PLOT SPATIAL PATTERN .................................................... 40
DESCRIPTIVE...................................................................................................................... 40
CORRELATION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 41
POINT-PATTERN ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 42
SILVICULTURE RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 45
THE BASIS FOR SILVICULTURE........................................................................................... 45
WHAT IS ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT?............................................................................... 46
THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT FOR SILVICULTURE ............................ 46
ASSUMPTIONS OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 47
A FRAMEWORK FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 49
3
DISTURBANCE SCALE ...........................................................................................................49
DISTURBANCE INTENSITY .....................................................................................................51
SILVICULTURE OPTIONS .................................................................................................... 51
SCENARIO 1: NO ACTION ......................................................................................................55
SCENARIO 2 – INFLUENCE COMPOSITION ONLY......................................................................58
SCENARIO 3 – INFLUENCE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE .....................................................60
INCREMENTAL SILVICULTURE............................................................................................ 66
MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SILVICULTURE.................................................... 66
RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 67
CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................. 68
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 69
APPENDIX 1 – VARIABLES MEASURED IN EACH PLOT .......................................... 70
APPENDIX 2 – SYSTEM FOR CLASSIFYING EVIDENCE OF DAMAGING AGENTS 72
APPENDIX 3 – SUMMARY OF SYSTEM FOR CLASSIFYING WILDLIFE TREETYPES ............................................................................................................................... 73
APPENDIX 4 – COARSE WOODY DEBRIS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ................... 74
APPENDIX 5 - CLASSIFICATION FOR SNAGS ............................................................ 75
APPENDIX 5 – CORRELATION BETWEEN VARIABLES AT THE PLOT LEVEL..... 76
VARIABLES CONSIDERED IN THE SIMPLE CORRELATION ANALYSIS ................................... 78
APPENDIX 6 – EXAMPLES OF RESULTS OF THE THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OFSPATIAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 79
DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 79
CORRELATION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 83
INTENSITY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 85
K-FUNCTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 87
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................. 91
4
Summary
Western hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria ssp lugubrosa) has caused extensive
forest disturbance within forests in the Robson Valley (Rocky Mountain Trench) in
central eastern British Columbia. In the early 1990s it caused defoliation over 39 000
hectares of forest that were largely dominated by western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla)
and western redcedar (Thuja plicata). The effects of western hemlock looper on a range
of ecosystem features have not been well documented.
This report describes the current condition of thirteen separate stands of trees that were
located within the area damaged by western hemlock looper in the 1990s outbreak. These
stands were located in areas where mortality of canopy trees due to defoliation was more
than forty percent.
The effects were variable across the stands. The major effect was the death of a high
proportion of trees from the range of tree species and sizes present. Both surviving and
dead trees displayed high levels of stem decay and a high incidence of damage from other
disturbance agents. The crown dimensions and conditions of surviving trees suggested
that they had largely recovered from the effects of the outbreak. Tree mortality had
created a high density of snags across the range of diameter classes. It was apparent that
these would be augmenting the already large pool of coarse woody debris for some time
to come. Tree regeneration consisted mostly of western hemlock with a moderate
component of western redcedar. Regeneration tended to be associated with stands where
mortality had been lower. The majority of trees in the sapling phase were already
showing evidence of decay. Stands generally contained two understorey layers. The
development of the upper understorey layer was most pronounced in areas of higher
mortality. A high proportion of the upper understorey cover consisted of species that
were generally associated with disturbance.
A search for spatial pattern revealed that a range of tree variables were distributed
randomly at scales of less than 50 m, and that sapling regeneration generally occurred in
5
clumps of less than 6 m diameter. A range of variables showed associations at a plot scale
(1480 m2) but no association at a smaller scales (100 m2). Boundaries in the state of
variables were frequently present within plots indicating that some degree of patterning
may exist at larger scales than those examined in this study.
The information on ecosystem composition and structure was coupled with conventional
silviculture knowledge to recommend silviculture strategies consistent with ecosystem
management. The primary goal was to provide a range of silviculture actions that would
create effects that mimic those of western hemlock looper. Four scenarios were proposed.
They were defined by the degree to which they maintained the frequency distribution of
disturbance patch sizes, and the compositional and structural characteristics created by
looper disturbance.
It was apparent that there were still critical gaps in knowledge concerning the ecology
and effects of western hemlock looper in the Robson Valley. Research that examined the
periodicity, pattern at large scales and cause of western hemlock looper events was
recommended.
Introduction
6
Introduction
An outbreak of western hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria ssp lugubrosa)(WHL)
between 1990 to 1994 caused defoliation over 39 000 ha of forest within the Robson
Valley (Taylor unpublished) (see Photograph 1). The majority of defoliation occurred in
1991 and 1992 (Taylor unpublished). This outbreak followed a defoliation event in 1954
and 1955 in which over 45 000 ha of forest in the Robson Valley was defoliated (Parfett
et al. 1995).
The effects of WHL on forest ecosystems are not well understood. Studies have mainly
concentrated on the biology and control of WHL. The same can be said for the closely
related eastern hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria ssp fiscellaria). Only one study of
the ecological impacts of WHL was found during an extensive literature search.
(Kinghorn 1954) examined tree and stand characteristics of areas defoliated during a
WHL outbreak in the 1940’s in the Coastal Western Hemlock Zone on Vancouver Island.
Kinghorn’s study occurred shortly after the cessation of the outbreak, concentrated on the
tree component of the ecosystem and presented only a snapshot of the effects of WHL.
A study was initiated in 1999 to address the issue of WHL in the Robson Valley.
Specifically (Hoggett unpublished-a) the study set out to:
1. Provide an indication of the relative importance of WHL as a natural disturbance
agent within a specified landscape unit.
2. Examine the effects of WHL on the structure and composition of stands within
Interior Cedar Hemlock (ICH) (Anon. 1996) forests.
3. Compare these effects with those of other disturbance agents (including harvesting).
Introduction
7
Photograph 1: Defoliation caused during the 1990s outbreak of western hemlock
looper (Goat River)
Photograph 2: An example of conditions within a stand defoliated by western
hemlock looper. Of particular note was the relatively high tree species diversity,
degree of tree mortality and development of the understorey
Introduction
8
4. Relate the landscape and stand level findings to the strategic provision of production
or environmental values1.
These aims were to be met using a three-stage project (termed the ‘project’ from here)
(Hoggett unpublished-b). This report covers the second of the aims. It was intended to
meet the requirements of a contract signed in 1999 between Zeidler Forest Industries Ltd.
and the University of British Columbia (ICH Investigation – The historical importance of
western hemlock looper in the ICH ecosystems of the Robson Valley).
The data for this report was collected as during Stage 2 of the project. It represents only
part of the information collected during field sampling. Further information concerning
the disturbance history of the ICH will continue to be made available as data analysis
continues.
Methods
Field Methods
Thirteen stands of ICH forest were sampled between June and October of 1999. The
approximate locations of the sampled stands have been indicated on Map 1. All stands
areas were located in a wet cool variant of the ICH (ICHwk3) (Anon. 1996) in the Rocky
Mountain Trench (Robson Valley). The stands were also located within the Crescent Spur
and Northern Trench Landscape units and within the B.C. Ministry of Forest Robson
Valley District. They were predominantly age class 9 (250 years or older). Two plots fell
in stands classified as age class 8 (140-250 years old). All stands demonstrated moderate
to severe tree mortality (more than 40% of canopy trees died) because of defoliation
during the WHL outbreak of the early 1990s (1990s outbreak).
1 Termed commodity (production) and amenity (environmental) throughout this report.
Introduction
9
Map 1: Approximate location of sampled stands
Map reproduced from – Sheet 93H McBride 1:250 000 scale topographical map. Department of Energy, Mines andResources Canada (1990).
N
10 kmApproximate Plot Locations
Introduction
10
The sampling population included all polygons identified as disturbed by WHL during
Stage 1 of the project (see Hoggett (unpublished-c)). Plot centre points were located
randomly within this population. Some latitude was used in locating final plot centres2.
This ensured that the plot occurred sufficiently far from boundaries of damage, and on
sites of mesic moisture regime and of moderate fertility (soil moisture regime 2-4, soil
nutrient regime B-D (Anon. 1996)). A 1480 m2 plot was placed perpendicular to aspect. It
consisted of a 10 x 100 m ‘extensive’ plot, overlaying a 22 x 40 m ‘intensive’ plot
(Diagram 1).
Diagram 1: Plot layout showing the arrangement of extensive and intensive plots
and the various subplots used for sub-sampling
A range of individual tree variables was measured for all trees (a tree was classified as
any individual of a tree species that was greater than 10 cm diameter at breast height over
bark (dbhob)). Additional tree variables were sampled for pre-specified subsets of trees.
A range of other variables were measured or estimated in a series of subplots that were
located within these two larger plots. Finally, four 20 m transects were used to assess
2 A systematic search procedure starting at the original plot centre was used. A maximum search radius of 200 m fromthe original plot centre limited the distance that the plot centre could be moved.
10 Metres
Intensive Plot
Extensive Plot
Subplots
Coarse woody debristransect
Introduction
11
characteristics of coarse woody debris. A comprehensive list of variables collected during
field sampling has been included in Appendix 1. These variables were selected following
examination of literature relating to disturbance and disturbance history assessment
(Hoggett unpublished-a).
Plot and sub-plot sizes were arbitrary but were thought likely to be of sufficient size and
appropriate shape to pick up important variation in the spatial distribution of ecosystem
elements. Total sample size was restricted by budget.
Analysis
Data were entered into spreadsheets and checked for field or data entry errors. A number
of derived variables were calculated in addition to the original variables collected in the
field. Non-spatial analysis was mostly conducted using SAS. Analysis of spatial
disposition and correlation was conducted using both SAS and S-PLUS.
Current Ecosystem Condition
12
Current Ecosystem Conditions
The results presented below concentrate on the data that was considered most useful for
describing current ecosystem conditions. They are applicable to all areas identified in
Stage 1 of the project as damaged during the 1990s outbreak.
Site
Physical site characteristics for all plots have been listed in Table 1.
Plots occurred on a range of aspects, in lower to mid topo-sequence positions, and in
areas of shallow slope. Underlying soils were moderate to deep, and generally had some
degree of clay accumulation in the B-horizon (Luvisolic). Coarse fragment contents were
generally low, and gleying was generally absent.
Table 1: Physical site characteristics for all plots in the study
Plot Elevation(m)
Slope(degrees)
Aspect SlopePosition
Total SoilDepth (cm)
Soil Type3 CoarseFragment
Content (%)
IN01 880 2 208 lower 75 O.GL 0
IN02 880 4 3 lower 60+ BR.GL 5
IN03 840 4 3 toe 80+ O.HFP 0
IN04 880 24 358 lower 90+ E.DYB 20
IN05 900 10 18 toe 70 E.DYB 5
IN06 1050 32 353 mid 60+ O.SB 50
IN07 950 12 70 mid 55 PZ.GL 5
IN08 850 5 128 mid 70+ BR.GL 0
IN09 950 8 318 mid 60+ BR.GL 10
IN10 850 4 3 lower 60+ D.GL 0
IO01 850 2 185 mid 90 GLBR.BL 0
IO02 880 5 280 mid 60 O.HFP 10
IO04 790 8 308 mid 60+ PZ.GL 5
3 Using classification presented in Soil Classification Working Group (1998)
Current Ecosystem Condition
13
Classification of site series using the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification (Pojar et
al. 1987) placed all plots either in the CwHw – Oak Fern site series (01) of the CWHw –
Devils Club – Lady fern site series (05) (Anon. 1996). A photograph of conditions that
were relatively typical within a defoliated stand has been included as Photograph 2.
Current Stand Condition
Diameter
The average diameter distribution for all stems greater than 10 cm dbhob has been
included as Graph 1. Diameter classes have been separated into the number of live and
dead individuals for each species.
The shape of Graph 1 (decreasing number of stems per hectare with increasing diameter
class) suggests stands of uneven age structure. Stands were generally dominated by
western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) and western redcedar (Thuja plicata). The
proportion of western redcedar increased as diameter increased. Subalpine fir (Abies
lasiocarpa) and spruce (Picea glauca x engelmanni) were the only other species of
numerical importance. They were generally confined to diameter classes of less than 50
cm. The high mortality illustrated in Graph 1 was expected. The level of basal area
mortality was the major criterion in delineating the sample population.
Estimates of mean mortality rates and standard errors (SE) for each species within each
diameter class have been depicted in Graph 2 (for those classes where more than two
observations were available). These rates were calculated using live trees, and trees that
had died recently (decay class 3). Old dead trees were excluded (decay classes 4 to 9).
The assumption was that all recent mortality was either directly or indirectly attributable
to defoliation during the 1990s WHL outbreak. Systematic examination of all trees in the
interior plot did not reveal any evidence to the contrary.
Current Ecosystem Condition
14
Species codes used throughout report: Tp – Thuja plicata; Th-Tsuga heterophylla; Al – Abies
lasiocarpa; Px – Picea glauca x engelmannii; Bp Betula papyrifera; Pm – Pseudosuga menziesii var
glauca
Graph 1: Average Diameter Distribution
Current Ecosystem Condition
15
Graph 2: Estimated mortality by species
Mean mortality of more than 60% of the estimated number of stems that were living prior
to the outbreak was observed for all species for almost all diameter classes (Photograph
3). Estimates of standard errors indicated a reasonable degree of variability between
observations from different plots. Differences in mortality between diameter classes
within species, and between species were not significant (α=0.05).
Current Ecosystem Condition
16
Photograph 3: Variable mortality from defoliation associated with the 1990s
outbreak.
Photograph 4: Logs harvested from areas defoliated during the 1990s outbreak. The
camera case has been included for scale.
Current Ecosystem Condition
17
Volume and Basal Area
The distribution of volume by species within each diameter class has been presented in
Graph 3. Volume considers not only the number of individuals, but also the size of
individuals. It is closely related to basal area and both were better representations of site
occupancy4 than number of individuals alone.
The volume distribution indicated that looper affected stands were dominated by western
redcedar and hemlock.
Examination of basal area figures revealed that live western redcedar occupied 21.6
m2ha-1 and western hemlock 10.1 m2ha-1. The three other coniferous species contributed
only approximately 1 m2ha-1 to live basal area respectively. The majority of basal area
was found in stems of between 35 and 80 cm dbhob. Approximately two-thirds (55.0
m2ha-1, SE=5.7) of the total basal area (86.4 m2ha-1, SE=4.0) was dead.
The 1990s WHL event caused a shift in basal area dominance. Prior to the event, both
western redcedar and western hemlock had basal areas of approximately 40 m2ha-1.
Following the event, the basal area of western redcedar was half of its pre-outbreak level,
but nearly twice that of western hemlock. This shift in dominance was not apparent from
examining the simple diameter distribution. It suggested a reduction in the importance of
western hemlock in the overstorey due to the outbreak.
4 Better indices of site occupancy exist. Volume and basal area account not only for current site occupancy (live basalarea), but includes an element of historical site occupancy (accumulated dead basal area). Other indices of siteoccupancy include sapwood basal area or leaf area index. These are, however, considerably more difficult to accuratelyestimate.
Current Ecosystem Condition
18
Graph 3: Volume in diameter classes by species and status
Height
Average frequency of live and dead individuals of different species are represented in
Graph 4 for each height class.
Current Ecosystem Condition
19
Graph 4: Density distribution by height class
Two major height groupings were apparent from Graph 4. The classes between 6 and 12
m height and between 18 and 26 m height account for the majority of stems. This
suggested that trees generally occur in two major layers. The upper layer represented the
canopy. The live component of this upper layer was generally dominated by western
redcedar. The live component of the lower layer was dominated by western hemlock.
Live western hemlock was generally absent in height classes of over 30 m. Live
subalpine-fir and spruce were confined to the canopy layer.
The mean densities for classes of trees less than 14 m and over 30 m was more variable
(higher coefficients of variation). This suggested that most plots had relatively stable
Current Ecosystem Condition
20
densities of trees in the 14 to 30 m height range, but that the density of trees outside this
range was much more variable between plots.
Decay
The estimated mean and standard errors for percent of decayed basal area have been
presented for each species in Graph 5. The same estimates are presented for each
diameter class for both western redcedar and western hemlock in Graphs 6 and 7. In this
study, decay was recognized as the presence of evidence of decay fungi within the stem
(decayed wood or wood discoloured by decay fungi). Estimates of decay were made by
coring a sub-sample of trees from the range of canopy classes within each plot. Decay
estimates were made at 0.3 m for all sub-sampled trees of greater than 10 cm dbhob
(diameter at 1.3 m over bark), and at 0.0 m for sub-sampled trees of less than 10 cm
dbhob. Photograph 4 depicted the degree of decay often found in ICH stands.
Graph 5: Percent basal area decayed
Current Ecosystem Condition
21
Graph 6: Percent basal area decayed by diameter class for western redcedar
Graph 7: Percent basal area decayed by diameter class for western hemlock
Current Ecosystem Condition
22
These graphs suggested that the proportion of decay was greater in dead than live stems,
and that the proportion of decay increased from subalpine fir to western hemlock to
western redcedar. The proportion of decay also increased with increasing diameter class
for both western redcedar and western hemlock. A mean of greater than 50% decay was
observed for almost all diameter classes of western redcedar. Mean observed decay was
between 40 and 50% for most western hemlock diameter classes. Decay extended even
into the smallest diameter classes, with an observed mean of approximately 30% for
western redcedar saplings.
Crown Condition
The mean crown cover5 of live and dead trees and proportion of gap have been presented
in Graph 8. Live crown ratio estimates by diameter class for trees surviving the 1990s
outbreak have been included in Graph 9.
Graph 8: Percent cover by cover type class
Current Ecosystem Condition
23
Graph 9: Mean live crown ratio by diameter class
Graph 8 illustrated that only an estimated average of 40% of canopy area was occupied
by living trees at the time of sampling. This left approximately 60% of the canopy area in
gap, up from an estimate of just over 13% prior to the WHL outbreak. The majority of
the area available for light foraging by canopy trees was no longer occupied by living
crown.
The majority of trees that survived the WHL event had deep crowns (Graph 9). Mean live
crown ratios were generally greater than 50% in all diameter classes and stable between
plots (low standard errors for all diameter classes). This coupled with incidental field
5 Crown cover was defined as the projected outline of the outer extremities of either foliage (for live trees) or branchstructure (for dead trees).
Current Ecosystem Condition
24
observations and supplemental data, indicated that most of the surviving trees had largely
recovered from any defoliation had occurred. Crown volume was, therefore, unlikely to
have significantly constrained the ability of surviving trees to respond to the new growth
conditions created by the WHL event.
A relatively systematic fluctuation in live crown ratios with increasing diameter was
evident in Graph 9. This suggested some degree of competitive stratification within
height classes. Expression of relative dominance within any height strata would tend to
allow trees to increase diameter and maintain greater live crown ratios over less dominant
trees within the same height strata.
Other Tree Characteristics
Evidence of Damaging Agents
Each tree within the intensive plot was assessed for evidence of a range of other
damaging agents. The classification system used for recording this evidence has been
provided in Appendix 2.
It is important to note that observation of other tree characteristics was conducted from
ground level. This method was robust for features that were close to, or readily
observable from ground level. The ability to detect smaller or more obscure features was
reduced as height above ground level increased, and as branches and live crown obscured
the upper stem. Observations were also made based on external features. Soil or bark
excavations were only conducted if some external feature of the tree suggested the
presence of a hidden damaging agent. The following information was, therefore, likely to
be a conservative estimate of the occurrence of the other tree characteristics.
It is also important to note that some degree of interpretation was necessary in classifying
some features. For example, it was often difficult to determine the cause of a scar that had
healed. If the cause was not obvious, the feature was classified as of unknown origin.
Current Ecosystem Condition
25
Finally, it was considered impractical to attempt to assess the total number of some
features (e.g. small scars made by some insect feeding birds). The number of individuals
of a feature on a single tree was counted if there were less than 10. Trees with more than
10 of an individual feature were considered as a separate class.
The mean and standard error for the density of the most common forms of evidence of
damaging agents has been presented in Graph 10.
Graph 10: Density of the most common damaging agents (Size: 1= <10 cm longest
dimension; 2= 10 to 99 cm; 3= 99 to 9999 cm)
Conks and cankers were the most frequently observed evidence of damaging agents.
These were generally confined to western hemlock and were endemic for this species
(though they did occasionally occur on subablpine fir and spruce where these species
were present). The most common species was brown stringy trunk rot (Echinodontium
Current Ecosystem Condition
26
tinctorium). The only other regularly observed decay fungi was brown crumbly rot
(Fomitopsis pinicola). Mechanical scars were also relatively common and generally of
greater than 10 cm in their longest dimension (see Photograph 5). The relatively high
density of deep mechanical scars for size class three resulted from classifying cracks
caused by mechanical stress as mechanical scars.
Wildlife Trees
The estimated mean density and standard error for types of wildlife trees has been
included as Graph 11.
Graph 11: Mean density of wildlife tree types
Current Ecosystem Condition
27
Photograph 5: Surface scarring on western redcedar caused by mechanical
abrasion. Scars were one of the more common effects of damage observed.
Photograph 6: Advance regeneration showing typical form and species composition
Current Ecosystem Condition
28
The classification used for wildlife trees (WLT) followed that provided by Keisker
(1999). A brief summary of the WLT classification has been included in Appendix 3.
Searches for features corresponding with Keisker (1999) first two coarse woody debris
classes were also made on all standing trees (small and large low spaces, WLT 11-12).
The caveats mentioned for the interpretation of evidence of damaging agents apply to the
WLT observations. Assessment of WLTs was conducted in a similar manner to that for
damaging agents.
The highest estimated WLT densities occurred for trees that displayed hard outer wood
with decay softened inner wood (WLT-1). Western hemlock constituted the majority of
trees in this class. The density presented in Graph 11 was likely to have been a substantial
underestimate for this WLT type. Coring revealed that the majority of western redcedar
trees would also have fallen into this class, had evidence of decay been readily
observable from exterior features.
The data also revealed relatively high densities of low large spaces (WLT 11). Moderate
densities were observed for; trees with outer and inner wood softened by decay (WLT 2);
cracks, loose bark, or deeply furrowed bark (WLT 6); large branches, multiple leaders, or
large diameter broken tops (WLT 8)6; and small concealed spaces at or below ground
level (WLT 12).
Dead Material
Coarse Woody Debris
Coarse woody debris (CWD) was defined as any dead stem that formed an angle of less
than forty-five degrees with the ground and was greater than 10 cm average diameter at
the point where it intersected with the sampling transect line. CWD was classified using a
6 Trees were only included as WLT 8 if they were judged to meet the functional requirements of this class as nest orroost sites for large bodied species.
Current Ecosystem Condition
29
decay class system based on that of Triska and Cromack (1980). A class was added to the
classification to allow differentiation between heavily decayed CWD found on the forest
floor (Class V), and heavily decayed CWD that was largely submerged within the forest
floor (Class VI). The classification system has been presented in Appendix 4.
The data from CWD sampling has been included in Graphs 12 and 13.
Large volumes of CWD were present. The majority of CWD was difficult to attribute to
particular species, because of its relatively advanced stage of decay. It was, however,
apparent from Graph 12 that all major species have contributed to the CWD pool. The
majority of coarse woody debris was in decay classes (DC) three and above. This
suggested that input of CWD from trees that died during the 1990s outbreak had been
relatively low at the time of sampling.
Snags
Graph 14 presents the mean densities of snags by diameter and decay classes. Snags were
classified using the classes provided by Caza (1993). The summary of the classification
has been provided in Appendix 5.
Snags in DC3 dominated across all diameter classes. There were generally 10 or more
DC3 snags per hectare for every DC4 snag in each diameter class. DC4 was the only
other class of snags that was consistently represented across diameter classes. Densities
of DC5 and DC6 snags were low, and DC7 and DC8 snags were rare. The average
density of dead trees of greater than 10cm dbhob was 521 ha-1 (SE = 45.7). Twenty
percent of these dead stems were greater than 50cm dbhob.
Current Ecosystem Condition
30
Graph 12: Volume of CWD by species
Graph 13: Volume of CWD by decay class
Current Ecosystem Condition
31
Graph 14: Densities of snags by diameter and decay class
Tree Regeneration
Densities of regeneration (saplings and seedlings) have been presented in Graphs 15 and
16.
Both graphs show that regeneration was dominated by western hemlock (see Photograph
6). There was also a substantial component of western redcedar and a minor component
of subalpine fir. Spruce regeneration was virtually absent, and birch regeneration was
infrequent. Seedlings were the majority of regeneration (less than 1 cm diameter over
bark at ground level).
Current Ecosystem Condition
32
Graph 15: Densities of regeneration by class
Graph 16: Densities of regeneration by plot
Current Ecosystem Condition
33
The high standard errors associated with estimates in Graph 15 suggested that
regeneration was very variable between plots. This observation was supported by the data
in Graph 16. Some plots provided estimates of regeneration of close to 12 000 stems per
hectare, while some provided estimates of less than 1000 stems per hectare. There was a
moderate positive correlation between plot estimates for mean live canopy cover and total
density of regeneration (0.53). This suggests that higher levels of regeneration tend to be
associated with higher levels of live canopy.
Saplings showed high incidence of decay. An average of 71.8 percent of sub-sampled
saplings (SE=7.9) contained some evidence of decay. This decay generally constituted a
significant proportion of individual sapling basal area (see Graphs 6 and 7).
Other Ecosystem Components
Understorey Vegetation
The understorey vegetation (non-tree species) was generally two layered. The lower layer
(layer 1) had an average maximum height of 46 cm (SE=3). The upper layer (layer 2) had
an average maximum height of 213 cm (SE=11). Average covers for the thirty-five most
common understorey species are presented by layer in Graphs 17 and 18.
Average total covers for layers 1 and 2 were 52.4 percent (SE=3.9) and 39.6 percent
(SE=7.6) respectively. Layer 2 was generally of lower total and cover estimates for layer
2 were generally more variable between plots than those for layer 1. There was little
correlation between layer 1 cover and live canopy cover, or between covers in layers 1
and 2. Layer 2 demonstrated a moderate negative correlation with live canopy cover at
the plot level (increasing layer 2 cover as live canopy cover decreased) (See Photograph
7).
Current Ecosystem Condition
34
Graph 17: Cover of common understorey species in layer 1
Graph 18: Cover of common understorey species in layer 2
Current Ecosystem Condition
35
Photograph 7: Dense development of an upper understorey layer consisting of
species normally associated with disturbance (photograph taken after leaf fall)
Current Ecosystem Condition
36
The lower layer of the understorey was generally dominated by oak fern (Gymnocarpium
dryopteris). Other important species in this layer included bunchberry (Cornus
canadensis), common horsetail (Equisetum arvense), five-leaved bramble (Rubus
pedatus), and one-leaved foamflower (Tiarella unifoliata). Layer 2 was generally
dominated by devils club (Oplopanax horridus) and red elderberry (Sambucus
racemosa). Other important species included lady fern (Athyrium filix-femina), fireweed
(Epilobium angustifolium), red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) and oval-leaved blueberry
(Vaccinium ovalifolium). Average moss cover was approximately 35% (SE=6.5).
The observations from the lower understorey layer were generally consistent with the
expected species composition in climax communities (Anon. 1996). The same could not
be said for three of the most important species from the upper layer. Red elderberry,
fireweed and red raspberry were all species that would be expected to be more common
on disturbed sites (Haeussler et al. 1990). These species were competing successfully in
many stands despite there being no soil or forest floor disturbance during or since the
outbreak.
Forest Floor and Charcoal
Forest floor depth averaged 8.0 cm (SE=0.6) across all plots. Evidence of past fires in the
form of forest floor charcoal was generally weak. Graph 19 illustrates the average
proportion of subplots that contained charcoal. It was divided into charcoal index classes.
The charcoal index considered both the amount and the continuity of charcoal within the
forest floor. In general, the greater the index, the greater the amount of charcoal.
The majority of subplots within each plot had no readily observable charcoal within the
forest floor. Only a small proportion of subplots had high levels of charcoal. Despite the
low proportion of subplots with charcoal, some amount of charcoal was found in 11 of
the 13 plots. This indicated that fires had occurred in the past in most, if not all, of the
plots.
Current Ecosystem Condition
37
Graph 19: Mean proportion of subplots containing charcoal
Correlation between Ecosystem Elements at the Plot Level
Simple correlations were calculated using observed values for pairs of variables from
each plot. The variables that were used have been listed in Appendix 6. The pairs of
variables that had moderate to high correlation (absolute correlation of 0.6 or greater) and
were not considered trivial have also been listed in Appendix 6. The correlation analysis
has been discussed briefly below.
• There was a strong negative correlation between western redcedar and western
hemlock for both total and live basal area. This suggested that the relationship
between the two species is substitutive (when one species increases the other
decreases).
Current Ecosystem Condition
38
• There was also a strong positive correlation between total and live basal area of
western redcedar and total basal area for all species. Total basal area of western
hemlock was negatively correlated with total basal area for all species. Stands with
higher total basal area had higher proportions of western redcedar at the expense of
western hemlock.
• Total live basal area, survival and mean live cover all had strong positive correlation
with the basal area of live western redcedar. This suggested that survival in stands
was closely linked with the presence and survival of western redcedar.
• The mean dbh and height of live canopy trees was positively correlated with the basal
area of western redcedar. Stands with greater proportions of western redcedar tended
to have surviving canopies that consisted of taller and larger trees.
• Plots with live trees with higher heights to base of live crown, and with smaller live
crown ratios suffered more basal area mortality. This suggested a relationship
between tree characteristics and the stand’s response to the WHL outbreak.
• Stands with greater proportions of western redcedar tended to have greater covers of
the lower understorey layer (layer 1), and reduced covers of moss.
• Regeneration density was positively correlated with the total basal area of live
western hemlock. Both of these variables were also positively correlated with moss
cover.
• There was increased development of a second understorey layer as tree mortality
associated with WHL increased. The development of a second understorey layer was
also coupled with a decrease in moss cover and regeneration density, and with an
increase in the average height to live crown in canopy level trees.
• The density of Type 1 wildlife trees (WT1) was found to decrease as the proportion
of total basal area affected by decay increased.
Current Ecosystem Condition
39
This result was clearly spurious, as the definition of WT1 includes all trees with internal
decay. The correlation between WT1 and other ecosystem features clearly demonstrated
the limitations of external examination for assessing internal tree features. The
explanation lies in the ability to detect WT1 from external examination. WT1 were
positively correlated with western hemlock basal area and negatively correlated with
western redcedar basal area. This was because evidence of internal decay was visible in
the form of conks and cankers on western hemlock, but was not visible on western
redcedar. Graphs 5 and 6 demonstrated that mean decay levels were higher in western
redcedar than hemlock. This was confirmed by correlation, which found that total decay
levels were positively correlated with total basal area of western redcedar and were
negatively correlated with total basal area of western hemlock. In other words, as the
proportion of western redcedar in the stand increased so did the proportion of decay.
Spatial Pattern
40
Analysis of Within Plot Spatial Pattern
The method of data collection used for this project enabled the analysis of the spatial
pattern of ecosystem elements within each plot. The purpose of this analysis was to
describe spatial disposition at a range of resolutions. This approach acknowledges that
the information provided when using a single scale of observation (such as a single plot
size) provides just one perspective. It may miss important relationships at different scales.
The use of a variety of scales may provide a more complete picture of ecosystem
interactions, and assist in more accurately describing and predicting ecosystem condition.
Spatial data can be collected in a number of ways (Cressie 1993). A range of techniques
was available for assessing spatial pattern for each type of spatial data (Cressie 1993).
During this study, point-pattern data was collected for all trees and for a subset of
saplings. Geostatistical and lattice data were collected for a range of other variables.
Forest floor depths and overstorey crown cover estimates are examples of geostatistic
data, while understorey cover and seedling density estimates are examples of lattice data.
Spatial data was examined using four approaches. These were: (1) purely descriptive; (2)
an examination of average correlation: and analysis of point-pattern data using both (3)
intensity and (4) K-functions. Examples of the outcomes of the analyses have been
presented in Appendix 7. Each is discussed briefly below.
Descriptive
Descriptive examination of lattice and geostatistical data involved the plotting of values
for each variable of interest against distance from the southernmost endpoint of the plot
centerline (x=0, y=0 coordinate). Descriptive analysis of the point-pattern data involved
the mapping of tree locations with symbols that reflected diameter, height and tree status
(live or dead).
The graphs were useful for visualizing the change in variable values over space, but did
not reveal any consistent pattern in the data. They demonstrated that the state of a number
Spatial Pattern
41
of variables changed dramatically within individual plots. They also revealed that values
for any given variable were often quite different between plots. This suggested that the
distribution of variable states was patchy following the outbreak, and patch boundaries in
many variables could be identified when examining data from a 100 x 10 m plot.
Correlation Analysis
A simple correlation analysis was undertaken using the geostatistical and lattice data.
This approach was used as sequences of lattice and geostatistical data were too short to
effectively undertake more conventional analysis techniques. The correlation analysis
calculated the correlation between pairs of variables for all subplots within a plot. For
example, the correlation between overstorey canopy cover and moss cover was calculated
for each plot using pairs of measurements from each subplot. An average and its
associated standard error were then estimated for the population from the 13 plot-level
correlations.
Consistent correlation between variables in space represented one form of spatial
patterning. Some degree of spatial patterning had already been identified between plots
(see Correlation between Ecosystem Elements at the Plot Level). This implied a spatial
scale of 1480 m2 or greater. It was considered possible that some degree of spatial
association between variables existed at smaller scales than this.
Twenty variables were selected for the correlation analysis. This analysis was conducted
using a regular lattice of 10 by 10 m, centered on the plot centerline, and running from
one end of the plot to the other. Both 5 and 10 m intervals were used. Correlation at
larger scales than this was not tested. Correlation between overstorey and other features
at smaller scales than these were thought unlikely because of the scale of individual
canopy trees.
While the correlation between a number of variable pairs were significantly different
from 0 (α=0.05), only two were both non-trivial and had an absolute correlation of
greater than 0.25 (α=0.05). These were:
Spatial Pattern
42
• a weak negative correlation between the basal area of sub-canopy trees and the
proportion of overstorey in canopy gap
• a moderate positive correlation between the height of layer A trees (emergent,
dominant, and codominant) and the total live basal area.
In other words, sub-canopy level trees tended to be more prevalent under canopy (either
live or dead), and higher levels of live basal area were associated with stands with taller
canopy heights.
The general conclusion from this analysis was that relationships between canopy and sub-
canopy features were operating at scales of greater that 10 m.
Point-Pattern Analysis
Point-pattern analysis was conducted for tree and sapling data. The tree data from the
extensive plot was used (100 x10 m) and sapling data from the contiguous subplots
within the intensive plot (25 x 5 m). Both intensity and K-function analysis were
attempted. Both types of analysis are capable of detecting departures from complete
spatial randomness (CSR). In essence, they were capable of showing where point-
patterns are more aggregated or regular than would be expected if the underlying process
of point distribution was purely random. Examples of both types of analyses are
presented in Appendix 7. The results of the K-function analysis were more revealing than
the intensity analysis. The K-function analysis has been discussed below.
Both tree and sapling data were analyzed on a plot by plot basis. Initially tree data in each
plot was treated as a whole, and then classes of trees within each plot were examined
separately. Sapling data was treated as a whole because of the relatively low number of
saplings. The maximum scale at which pattern could be detected was equal to half the
maximum dimension of the plot (in this case diagonal of the rectangular plots). This
limited pattern analysis to approximately 50 m scale for trees and 13 m scale for saplings.
The results of the K-function analysis for both tree and sapling data have been presented
in Table 2.
Spatial Pattern
43
Table 2: Results of K-function analysis – the numbers in the table represent the
number of plots displaying the spatial arrangement
No Pattern Aggregated Regular Both
Trees Western redcedar 10 0 2 0
Western hemlock 10 2 0 1
Ht=4 to 17.9 m 8 2 2 1
Ht=18-36 m 11 1 1 0
Tree layer 1 9 1 3 0
Tree layer 2 7 3 2 1
Tree layer 3 8 2 3 0
Live trees 9 1 1 0
Dead trees 9 1 3 0
All trees 10 1 2 0
Saplings All 0 8 0 4
The K-function analysis revealed that there was no consistent pattern in tree distribution
at scales of less than 50 m for any of the classes of trees examined. Trees were, overall
randomly distributed at this scale. This meant that, at scales of less than 50 m, species
were not clumped, height strata were relatively continuous, and individuals that died from
WHL defoliation were randomly distributed.
This finding does not preclude the existence of pattern at large scales than 50 m. Indeed,
the differences between the values for variables between plots, suggested that boundaries
between states of single variables exist within the area disturbed by WHL. Distinct
changes in the state of single variables within plots were revealed by the descriptive
spatial analysis (see Graphs 1-3 in Appendix 7). This suggested that boundaries occurred
over relatively short distances. The frequency of observed boundaries further suggested
that scales of the order of around 100 m may be a useful starting point for searching for
larger scale pattern in overstorey variables.
Saplings demonstrated a strong tendency to aggregate at scales of generally less than 6 m.
They also demonstrated an occasional tendency to regular distribution at scales of
Spatial Pattern
44
between 8 and 12 m. In other words, there were more saplings closer together at all
distances less than 6 m than were expected under a random distribution. There were also
less saplings closer together than 8 to 12 m than were expected with a random pattern.
The data for seedling distributions were not amenable to K-function analysis. An
examination of stocking across subplots did, however, tend to suggest that seedlings also
had a patchy distribution. Only an average of 25 percent (SE=4.9) of the seedling
subplots contained seedlings. This confirmed general field observations of clumping of
both classes of regeneration.
The general conclusions of the spatial analysis were that:
• The distribution of a range of classes of trees was essentially random at scale of less
than 50 linear m.
• Regeneration was clumped. Saplings were aggregated in groups of less than 6 m
dimension.
• Large changes in the state of variables were frequently observed at a 1000 m2 scale.
This suggested a logical point for continuing any analysis of spatial pattern.
• Any association between overstorey variables and other variables occurred at a scale
of greater than 100 m2.
• Associations between overstorey variables and other variables were observed at the
1480 m2 scale.
Recommendations
45
Silviculture Recommendations
The Basis for Silviculture
Informed and appropriate silviculture works on the interface between science and social
values. It requires:
• A good knowledge of the current state of the ecosystem in which it is to occur.
• An understanding of the likely responses of ecosystem elements to a broad range of
possible silvicultural actions.
• A clear understanding of the values which the forest owner demands from the area
that is to be managed.
With this information it is possible to design silviculture which sustains ecosystems while
meeting the objectives of the forest owner as efficiently as possible.
This report has provided a description of the current state of ecosystems that have been
affected by WHL. The likely responses of ecosystem elements to a broad range of
silvicultural actions are relatively well known in general terms for major ecosystem
elements. Knowledge concerning likely responses in specific circumstances, and linked
to the Robson Valley has been increasing (Coxson 1996, Jull et al. 1999, Stevenson et al.
1995).
The most problematic of these requirements has generally been to understand the values
that the forest owner demands. This has certainly been the case where forest ownership
was largely public, as in British Columbia. For the purposes of this report, information
concerning a specific goal was requested in the contract specification. Advice was sought
on silviculture practices that would assist in meeting the goals of ecosystem management.
This request reflected the recent broad emphasis on the adoption of the principles of
ecosystem management in provincial and federal policy and regulation.
Recommendations
46
What is Ecosystem Management?
Ecosystem management has been hailed as the emerging management paradigm in
natural forested areas in North America (and some other regions of the developed and
developing world). It is defined, in cumbersome language, by Christensen et al. (1996)
as:
“… management driven by explicit goals, executed by policies, protocols, and
practices, and made adaptable by monitoring and research based on our best
understanding of the ecological interactions and processes necessary to sustain
ecosystem composition , structure and function” .
It attempts to meet a number of societal, cultural, institutional and scientific challenges to
enable the management of natural ecosystems that is both ecologically and socially
sustainable (Gerlach and Bengston 1994). Ecosystem management focus primarily on
sustainability of ecosystem structures and processes necessary to deliver commodities or
amenities, rather than on the commodities or amenities that ecosystems are capable of
providing (Christensen et al. 1996).
Ecosystem management has been widely adopted in the United States (Gerlach and
Bengston 1994, Thomas 1994). In Canada, the central tenets of ecosystem management
have, either explicitly or implicitly, been incorporated into a number of national policy
documents including Sustainable Forestry - a Canadian Commitment developed by the
Canadian Council for Forest Ministers (Galindo-Leal and Bunnell 1995). In British
Columbia the precepts of ecosystem management have been incorporated into the Forest
Practices Code, the Commission on Resources and Environment, the Protected Areas
Strategy, and the Biodiversity Guidelines (Galindo-Leal and Bunnell 1995).
The Implications of Ecosystem Management for Silviculture
A foundation of ecosystem management was the concept of intergenerational equity
(Christensen et al. 1996). As national and global societies, intergenerational equity
required that future generations inherit forest resources of the same size and that present
Recommendations
47
the same or a greater range of opportunities as those that this generation inherited
(Christensen et al. 1996).
With complete knowledge and certainty, intergenerational equity would be a predictably
achievable target. Unfortunately, uncertainty, surprise and limits to knowledge are
acknowledged features of natural systems (Kay 1995, Christensen et al. 1996). For
instance, though it is generally acknowledged that there are limits to the stress that
natural ecosystems can withstand and remain viable (Christensen et al. 1996), these limits
are usually not known. Intuitively, in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge
manage must either capitulate, or adopt strategies that are most likely to perpetuate the
features of existing forests that society views as significant in terms of intergenerational
equity.
Ecosystem management has pursued the latter course by adopting, as a central strategy,
management that conserves or restores natural ecosystem disturbance patterns
(Christensen et al. 1996, Galindo-Leal and Bunnell 1995, Kaufmann et al. 1994).
Kimmins (1993) provided an explanation for the basis for this strategy. He noted that in
the absence of full ecological knowledge and experience, forest managers “… must use
available scientific knowledge and theory, and empirical evidence from nature’s own
experiments with ecosystems” as a guide for forest management. The implication of this
approach was that the appropriate elements of ecosystem form and function are most
likely to be sustained within a range of disturbance that approximates the natural range
(Galindo-Leal and Bunnell 1995, Kimmins 1993). As Parminter (1998) said “…the
greater the similarities between the effects of a natural disturbance and the effects of
management activities, the greater the probability that natural ecological processes will
continue with minimal adverse impact”. It is this risk management strategy that provides
the justification for linking silvicultural action with precedents found in nature.
Assumptions of the Recommendations
The major assumption of these recommendations was that the 1990s outbreak was an
essentially natural event, and could be used as a model for silviculture that more closely
Recommendations
48
reflects natural disturbance7. It is acknowledged that other hypotheses concerning the
underlying cause of the recent WHL outbreak have been proposed (e.g. Zammuto
(1995)).
The second major assumption was that the effects observed during this event are
characteristic for WHL outbreaks in this area (or that there is a reasonable degree of
correspondence between successive WHL events). Numerous severe WHL events have
occurred in other areas of B.C. since 1913 (Parfett et al. 1995). The only other recorded
WHL outbreak in the Robson Valley was, however, only of light severity (Hoggett
unpublished-c, Parfett et al. 1995). In other words, while the 1950s outbreak was of
similar extent to the 1990s outbreak, its effects were much less intense.
Evidence for the validity of these two assumption was, at the time of this report,
circumstantial. They remained untested. There were no definitive answers to the
questions of periodicity, spatial extent, and the degree of correspondence between the
effects of successive events. Nor were the cause(s) of successive WHL outbreaks within
the Robson Valley known. The third stage of the project was designed to attempt to
address the first three of these questions.
The third assumption was that any silviculture actions at the stand level would take place
in the context of, and in agreement with a higher-level forest management plan. It is
assumed that this plan has taken into account the full range of values (both commodity
and amenity) at a landscape scale, and that timber production is one of these aims.
Finally, it is assumed that actions associated with timber production will occur consistent
with the goals of ecosystem management. The primary driver in the following
recommendations was the development of silviculture that mimics the effects of a natural
disturbance agent. It was not the provision of any particular set of commodity and/or
7 The existence of a large WHL event in the 1950s proved that WHL events have occurred in the past in the RobsonValley. The 1950s event also occurred in an area that was relatively remote from intensive human managementpractices (at the time that it occurred). This suggested that there have been essentially natural WHL outbreaks in theRobson Valley in the past.
Recommendations
49
amenity values. If other concerns are of overriding importance, selection of silviculture
actions may need to be extended to incorporate a greater range of silviculture
possibilities. A general discussion of the utility of various silviculture systems in BC has
been provided by Weetman (1996). A concise aid to silviculture decision making in the
ICH using a broader range of silviculture possibilities has been presented in Peterson et
al. (1998c).
A Framework for Recommendations
Natural disturbance can be classified based on the disturbance agent (or the cause), and
the effects of the disturbance agent. Effects include (Oliver and Larson 1996, Pickett et
al. 1987):
• the intensity of the disturbance event (which is reflected in the amount of existing
forest, forest floor vegetation, forest floor, and soil removed)
• the frequency of disturbance
• and the size and shape of the area disturbed.
The third stage of this project will attempt to deal with periodicity. Stage 1 and data
analyzed in this report can offer information on spatial scale and intensity. In other
words, the information outlined below deals with the effects of a WHL outbreak when it
occurs. It does not address the critical issue of how often these events visit the landscape.
Disturbance Scale
Stage 1 of this project identified boundaries for areas that had been disturbed with
moderate to severe intensity during the 1990s outbreak (Hoggett unpublished-c). The size
range of polygons identified in Stage 1 and the proportion of damage in each size class
has been included as Table 3.
Recommendations
50
Table 3: Size range of polygons showing moderate to severe intensity of disturbance
following the 1990s WHL outbreak.
Polygon Size (Ha) <10 10 to <50 50 to <250 250 to <1000
Number of Polygons 2 16 6 2
Total Area in this Class (Ha) 10 575 1218 1976
% Total Area of WHL Damage 0.26 15.22 32.23 52.29
One important characteristic of this data was that non-natural features (such as roads,
logging boundaries, ecological classification boundaries) caused breaks in contiguity that
were treated as polygon boundaries. For example, if the disturbance straddled a major
road, the two sides of the road were treated as separate polygons. This tended to reduce
the size of polygons.
A second feature was that this data did not deal with areas of light mortality. A decision
was made to concentrate on those areas where tree mortality was likely to trigger
significant changes in ecosystem composition and/or structure8. Areas of light WHL
severity may also offer a model for management. It is important to state, however, that
the light damage occurred in addition to more severe damage. The effects were, therefore,
cumulative rather than substitutive.
With these features in mind, it was apparent that polygon sizes varied by several orders of
magnitude. Some polygons were under 10 hectares while others were close to 1000
hectares. The number of polygons of greater than 250 hectares was low, but they
represented over half of the total area of moderate to severe disturbance. Almost 85% of
the disturbance area was in polygon sizes of greater than 50 hectares.
8 This was a pragmatic decision. Areas of moderate to high disturbance severity were most likely to be useful fordetermining the differences between the effects of major disturbance types (an important goal of Stage 2 of the project).They were also most likely to offer models that would be easier to integrate with current management practices.
Recommendations
51
Disturbance Intensity
The intensity of disturbance has been described in detail earlier in this report. It effects
have been briefly summarized in Table 4 in terms of two major descriptors: structure (or
horizontal and vertical arrangement of elements, and composition (the species of tree and
understorey plants). The purpose of this summary was to succinctly set the stage for the
silviculture options outlined below.
Silviculture Options
It is apparent that silviculture options exist for: (1) treating the area affected by the 1990s
outbreak, and (2) directing future silviculture activities outside of the current area.
In either case, the range of options span from preserving (for (1)) or mimicking (for (2))
the post disturbance structure and composition, to ignoring it. Four points (called
Scenarios) in this continuum that offered a logical reference for discussion were:
1. Mimic precisely the post WHL spatial scale as well as the internal structure and
composition of disturbed patches.
2. Mimic precisely the post WHL spatial scale, leave the internal structure largely in
tact, but influence species composition.
3. Mimic precisely the post WHL spatial scale, but modify the internal structure and
influence the species composition.
4. Do not consider the post WHL spatial scale and substantially modifying both
structure and composition.
Scenario 4 was the default management strategy at the time of the study. Any similarity
between its effects and those of WHL would be purely coincidental. It has not been
considered further here.
Recommendations
52
Table 4: Summary of the effects of WHL outbreak on a range of ecosystem elements
Element Arrangement Compositon
Canopy
Trees
Multilayered.
Essentially randomly distributed at scales of lessthan 50 m, but did show distinct boundaries insome variables at scales of 100 m.
High proportion of canopy space currentlyoccupied by dead trees.
No observed spatial pattern in the distribution ofeither live or dead trees (mortality random atscales of less than 50 m).
Mixed species.
Dominated by western redcedar and westernhemlock which occur in relatively equalproportions (in terms of basal area).
High proportion of the basal area of livetrees decayed.
High proportion of trees displaying theeffects of other damaging agents.
Regeneration Aggreated into clumps.
Higher densities found with higher levels ofcanopy cover.
Lower densities where with increasing densityof second understorey layer .
Dominated by western hemlock, with asubstantial proportion of western redcedar.
Minor component of subalpine fir.
Spruce virtually absent.
Majority of saplings showing signs of decay
Understorey Two layered, with second layer more variable interms of total cover.
Increasing development of a the second layerwith decreasing live cover of live overstorey(increasing mortality).
Mixed species.
Layer 2 with major component of speciesnormally associated with disturbance andknown to be strongly competitive with treeregeneration.
Dead Woody
Material
High volumes of coarse woody debris.
CWD generally in advanced stages of decay.
High basal areas of snags (greater than 50% oftotal basal area).
Majority of snags in early stages of decay.
All species contributing to both the snag andCWD pool in proportion to their overallrepresentation in the ecosystem.
Forest Floor
and Soil
Moderate forest floor depths, showing noconsistent spatial pattern and no relationship toother ecosystem features.
Both soil and forest floor remained essentiallyundisturbed.
Recommendations
53
Scenarios 1 and 2 would be considered inappropriate by almost everyone as a direction
for silviculture in forest stands outside the outbreak area. The information in Table 4
suggested that, even within the outbreak area, the use of WHL as a model for silviculture
presents considerable problems. Many of the more obvious features of WHL disturbance
would be undesirable from both production and amenity perspectives. For example
extensive areas of dead standing trees or brush dominated ecosystems would not be
desirable from either a forest production or preservation perspective. It is also
acknowledged that the current management environment (operational and regulatory)
would prohibit the retention or development of many of these features. For example
patchy regeneration overtopped by dense brush would not meet free growing standards,
and working in stands with a significant component of standing dead and mostly decayed
timber would present a severe safety hazard.
This clearly demonstrated the requirement for interpretation when considering the goals
of ecosystem management. If a perfect mimic of natural disturbance is inappropriate,
what level of dissimilarity is acceptable? Ecosystem management requires that a decision
be made on the degree to which silviculture reflects natural processes. The underlying
criterion for this decision is the sustaining of ecosystem composition, structure and
function (Christensen et al. 1996). There was, at the time of preparing this report, no
objective method for determining the degree of dissimilarity at which this criterion would
no longer be met.
A decision tree for silviculture activities has been developed with these constraints in
mind. The tree has been presented in Diagram 2. It is appropriate for all areas that are to
be considered for harvesting in the ICHwk3 of the Robson Valley.
Recommendations
54
Diagram 2: Decision tree to assist in determining appropriate silviculture actions
Is stand within area disturbed
by WHL?
Is harvesting desirable?
Create treatment units of spatial scales
and spatial frequencies that
approximate WHL
Pursue actions consistent
with Scenario 3
Is stocking of surviving stems
and regeneration of sufficient
number and suitable
distribution to provide for
continuous canopy cover in
the medium term ?
Is the quality of
regeneration adequate?
Is harvesting practical?
Pursue actions
consistent with
Scenario 1
Pursue actions consistent
with Scenario 2
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Recommendations
55
The discussion below does not explicitly consider operational or regulatory constraints.
Rather, it suggests spatial distributions, and ecosystem structures and compositions that
reflect, to varying degrees, conditions following disturbance by WHL. The intention was
to describe a range of forest ecosystem possibilities. Local forest managers are more
familiar with the social, economic, operational and regulatory environments in the
Robson Valley. They are, therefore, in a far better position to determine the degree to
which these features can be usefully incorporated in day to day silviculture design and
implementation. The more of the features of WHL that can be built into silviculture
prescriptions, the more closely management will reflect WHL disturbance.
Though the discussion of scenarios has a quantitative foundation, the prediction of
scenario outcomes is largely qualitative. It was based on the authors experience in the
ICHwk3 and on a range of references that consider the silviculture and dynamics of ICH
ecosystems (Anon. 1996, Arsenault 1998, Camenzind 1989, Cameron 1998, Cameron
undated, Coates 1998, Jull et al. 1999, Peterson et al. 1998a, Peterson et al. 1998b,
Peterson et al. 1998c, Robinson and Moss 1990, Weetman et al. 1990).
Scenario 1: No Action
Description
This scenario may be appropriate for areas of the 1990s outbreak where the existing
canopy condition and natural regeneration were considered adequate for the purposes of
future management. The definition of adequate would have to be made in the light of the
management objectives for the area of forest in question. An area that was being
managed primarily for visual or habitat values would have different regeneration
objectives to an area that was being managed for the eventual production of saw- or
veneer logs.
This scenario would require no silviculture action beyond an assessment of the canopy
and regeneration. Scenario 1 would maintain the spatial distribution of WHL, as well as
its internal compositional and structural features. Its likely longer-term consequences
have been outlined in Table 5.
Recommendations
56
Table 5: Prognosis for Scenario 1
Element Prognosis
Canopy Trees • Enhancement of within stand structural diversity with long term persistence of a highdensity of snags, a moderate density of live canopy trees, a second understorey layerand gradual in-filling of canopy from regeneration pool.
• Clumped distribution of regeneration and competition with understorey will probablyresult in relatively low densities of live canopy trees. These trees will have relativelyhigh live crown ratios and relatively highly tapered stems.
• Composition of mainly western hemlock and western redcedar. Other species can onlybe expected in relatively low proportions.
• Majority of trees will display relatively high proportions of decayed basal area.
Regeneration • Continued initiation and development of advance regeneration aggregated into clumps.
• In-filling mainly consisting of those species capable of surviving under low lightconditions and regenerating on undisturbed forest floor.
• Higher densities found with higher levels of canopy cover.
• Lower densities where with increasing density of understorey layer 2.
Understorey • A phase of continuing development of the second understorey layer and totalunderstorey cover.
• Increasing proportion of species normally associated with disturbance within theunderstorey.
• The eventual reduction in understorey cover as trees regain dominance over the site.
Dead WoodyMaterial
• Long term persistence of a relatively high density of snags
• Increasing volumes of coarse woody debris at the expense of the density of snags
• Initial phase of a large proportion of this CWD in early stages of decay.
Forest Floorand Soil
• Potential change in forest floor depth and humus form resulting from the changes intype and amount of litter input.
• No soil or forest floor disturbance
Risks
There was a range of risks inherent in this treatment. The most important related to the
quantity and quality of regeneration. Current and future regeneration will eventually fill
canopy positions.
The quality of regeneration present on site was poor and known to be of clumped
distribution. The species composition was also restricted to a subset of species that were
Recommendations
57
present in pre-outbreak stands. The regeneration that was present will face considerable
competition from the developing upper understorey layer. Evidence from the examination
of ICHwk3 stands regenerated by fire in the early twentieth century indicated that
understorey can suppress the development of a full canopy for over 100 years9. Finally,
regeneration will face significant risk of damage when the overstorey of dead tress begins
to disintegrate. At some stage the large number of DC 3 snags will fall. Field observation
suggested that this process was just beginning for the most decayed western hemlock.
The process could continue for decades10.
With all these factors at play, it was considered likely that a proportion of the current
outbreak area will take a considerable time to regain a full tree canopy. Trees that fill
canopy positions will be primarily decayed western hemlock and western redcedar. This
option was only considered suitable where management objectives other than the
production of timber are of primary concern, or where the regeneration at the time of
assessment can be demonstrated to be of suitable quantity and quality.
Another potential risk was that of fire hazard. It has been suggested that large areas of
dead timber present a significant fire hazard. Fire hazard is mainly related to the
accumulation and disposition of fine fuels. Field observation did not reveal any
significant accumulation of fine fuels at ground level. Input of fine fuels from dead trees
appears to be gradual and quickly incorporated into the forest floor layer. The relatively
dense blanket of deciduous understorey in those areas with highest mortality may actually
act to reduce fire hazard.
9 This evidence was gathered in a separate part of the Stage 2 of this study.
10 Field observations of early rapid decay of hemlock snags agreed with observations by reported in the literature(Engelhardt 1957, Johnson et al. 1970). A separate part of this study revealed that a moderate density of westernredcedar snags from fire early in the twentieth century were still standing in 1999. This disparity between the decay andpersistence of the different species present within the plots suggested that input into the CWD pool will start shortlyafter an outbreak and continue for many decades.
Recommendations
58
Scenario 2 – Influence Composition Only
Description
This scenario could be appropriate for areas of the 1990s outbreak. It would maintain the
spatial distribution of WHL disturbance, as well as its internal structural features.
Intervention to modify species composition would be undertaken in order to increase tree
species diversity and improve average tree stem quality.
Tactics
Tactics could include:
• Planting spot preparation
• Planting
• Brush control
• Fertilizing
A range of tree species could be planted including western redcedar, spruce, Douglas-fir,
subalpine fir and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) (Anon. 1996). The
continued persistence of western hemlock will be ensured by natural regeneration.
Planting in clumps of less than 6 m diameter would be appropriate, and may be one
method of allowing persistence of a second understorey layer without compromising a
full tree canopy in the long term. Initial brush control will almost certainly be required in
some areas. Selection of larger planting stock and spot fertilization at time of planting
would enhance seedling growth and the ability of seedlings to overtop competing
vegetation.
The likely long-term compositional and structural consequences have been outlined in
Table 6.
Recommendations
59
Table 6: Prognosis for Scenario 2
Element Prognosis
Canopy Trees • Enhancement of within stand structural diversity with long term persistence of ahigh density of snags, moderate density of surviving canopy trees, somedevelopment of a second understorey layer and the well stocked development of aregeneration layer.
• More even regeneration that Scenario 1 should ensure relatively rapid tree crownclosure over most of the treated area. Some patchiness resulting from understoreycompetition and falling snags will be present. Future canopy trees will have lowerlive crown ratios and more cylindrical height to diameter ratios than those inScenario 1.
• Composition shifted from dominance by western hemlock. Moderate components ofother species.
• Majority of future canopy trees will display low proportions of decayed basal area.They may have a range of other defects associated with mechanical damage causedby falling snags.
Regeneration • Initial high regeneration densities of a mix of species following planting distributedrelatively evenly across treatment area.
• Long period of relatively low regeneration success once planted and currentlyexisting regeneration achieves canopy closure (as stands enter the stem exclusionphase (sensu Smith (1986)).
• Gradual in-filling of any residual unoccupied patches by those species capable ofsurviving under low light conditions and regenerating on undisturbed forest floor.
Understorey • An initial and general, but not complete reduction in the development of the secondunderstorey layer and total understorey cover associated with control measures.
• The more rapid exclusion of understorey cover than Scenario 1, coincident with theonset of stem exclusion. Some patches of understorey will be retained as a result ofsuccessful understorey competition and falling snags.
Dead WoodyMaterial
• Long term persistence of a relatively high density of snags
• Increasing volumes of coarse woody debris at the expense of the density of snags
• Initial phase of a large proportion of this CWD in early stages of decay.
Forest Floorand Soil
• Potential change in forest floor depth and humus form resulting from the changes intype and amount of litter input.
• Little or no disturbance to soil or forest floor.
Recommendations
60
Risks
The primary risk for this scenario relates to investment. The proposed silviculture tactics
would be expensive, would not be offset by timber harvesting, and would be carried for
the full rotation (assuming harvesting in the future). Their success, measured by the rapid
achievement of a full canopy of relatively high quality trees, would also not be a foregone
conclusion. The risks of understorey competition and damage to regeneration present in
Scenario 1 were also present in this scenario. It is important to note that understorey
control measures can only reduce understorey competition.
Finally, though planting will reduce the risk of perpetuating the decay cycle 11, new trees
will exist in a dense matrix of decayed trees, increasing their exposure to decay agents.
This risk of the perpetuation of decay will also be increased if regeneration was damaged
by falling snags.
With these features in mind, Scenario 2 was best considered as a rehabilitation operation,
funded from outside of a normal operating budget and its associated investment
constraints. Some damage to regeneration, and some degree of regeneration failure would
have to be expected.
Scenario 3 – Influence Composition and Structure
A decision concerning the appropriate silviculture system was important once
intervention that was more active was considered. Silviculture demands a long-term view
because of the long-lived nature of its primary object (the tree) and the generally slow
dynamics of the forest ecosystem in which it resides. The silviculture system has been the
traditional framework for silviculture actions. In essence, the silviculture system provides
a mechanism for linking treatments in time, and for linking treatments to management
goals.
Recommendations
61
Where timber harvesting will occur, a heavily modified clear-cutting silviculture system
(what Nyland (1996) terms heavy removal cutting) was considered the most effective
method of preserving a range of features of stands disturbed by WHL (as outlined in
Table 4).
Shelterwood or seed-tree methods were not considered appropriate as they imply the
removal of any retained overstorey at some stage in the future. This generally occurs
before the residual overstorey begins to have an appreciable effect on the growth of
regeneration (Nyland 1996). There was no evidence to suggest that trees that survived the
WHL outbreak would be removed by some natural process once regeneration was
secured.
Selection methods (either group of single-tree) have had demonstrated success in the
northern ICH (Coates 1998, Jull et al. 1999). They were not considered appropriate as
methods for preserving or mimicking the effects of moderate to severe disturbance
caused by WHL. Selection systems do not remove all the trees in one area at one time
(Nyland 1996), as WHL had done in some areas. They imply the development of a
heavily regulated age class structure. They also require systematic thinning through the
range of age classes. The aim of thinning is to maintaining full site occupancy, structural
and compositional stability, and promote the growth of all residual trees to maturity
(Nyland 1996). This regulation requires frequent, relatively light, and relatively
homogeneous interventions. The result of selection silviculture applied at both the stand
and landscape scales, would be much more homogeneous and structured that the
observed effects of WHL. The incorporation of a legacy from a previous stand, though
possible, would also be more problematic than with other systems.
Clear-cutting, on the other hand, has an impact that is generally severe, but occurs
relatively infrequently. Its severity can legitimately be substantially modified in the
11 Both western redcedar and western hemlock can be grown on rotations of less than 100 years without dramatic lossto decay (Robinson and Moss 1990). This indicated that, providing the tree was free of decay early in its life cycle,there was a reasonable chance of it escaping dramatic loss to decay within a conventional timber rotation.
Recommendations
62
pursuit of non-timber objectives (Anon. 1995, Florence 1996)12. The retention of a
uniform or patchy distribution of trees and other ecosystem elements within clearcuts of a
range of sizes was considered most likely to preserve or mimic the range of ecosystem
features promoted by WHL.
The size class range of polygons suggested the approximate limits on the size of
treatment units and the appropriate proportions of units in each polygon size class (see
Table 3). Plot data has been used to provide a preliminary approximation of the
appropriate proportions of retention levels. Four of the thirteen plots (~30%) had
conditions that approximated clearcutting with little or no retention (basal area and
canopy cover survival of less than 15%)(see Graphs 1 and 2 in Appendix 7). The same
proportion had conditions that approximated heavy retention (basal area survival and
canopy cover survival of 50-75%). The remainder (~40%) had conditions that
approximated clearcutting with moderate retention (basal area survival of 15-50% and
live cover survival of between 15-65%)13. The size of retained patches within the
harvesting area could not be clearly stated from the data from this study. An appropriate
starting point (pending closer examination of pattern at larger scales) would be patches
with a shortest dimension (through the centre) of between 50 and 100 m. These
considerations form the basis for the scenario outlined below.
Description
This scenario could be appropriate for areas of the 1990s outbreak, and for areas outside
the outbreak. It would maintain or create patches within the size distribution of those that
result from WHL disturbance. It would involve the modification of both structure and
12 For example, Bunnell et al. (1998) provides a rationale for changing forest management for a large forestmanagement tenure on Vancouver Island to include this type of silviculture.
13 Smith (1986) defined clearcutting as a treatment in which virtually all vegetation is removed and almost all of thegrowing space becomes available for new plants. It is acknowledged that the areas of moderate retention levelssuggested here would move ecosystem conditions away from those conventionally associated with clearcutting. Smithdefined similar operations as heavy removal cutting. His terminology, however, has not been universally adopted.Irrespective, the proposed system has more in common with a single-cut clearcut, than with multi-cut even- or uneven-aged silviculture systems. Areas with high levels of retention are essentially reserves.
Recommendations
63
composition within patches of disturbance. Intervention to modify structure and species
composition would be undertaken in order to substantially influence tree species
composition, improve average tree stem quality, and promote the rapid growth of trees.
The silviculture system would be clearcutting with reserves.
Tactics
Tactics would include:
• Delineating between no retention, moderate retention and reserve areas
• Harvesting the overstorey in no- and moderate-retention areas
• Falling to waste non-merchantable trees (with or without subsequent stacking and/or
burning) in areas where they are not required as reserves
• Site or planting spot preparation
• Planting
• Brush control
• Fertilizing
A general guide to the selection and treatment of retention areas has been provided in
Table 7.
Recommendations
64
Table 7: Relative proportions of retention types for Scenario 3
No Retention Moderate Retention Reserves
Percent of HarvestingArea
30 40 30
Tactic Complete harvest Complete harvest withretained live trees
No harvesting –retention of all
ecosystem elements
Percent Live BasalArea Retention
0 30 100
Retention of DeadBasal Area
0 0 100
Distribution ofRetained Basal Area
None Uniform Not applicable
Control of competingvegetation
As required As required None
Target Areas withthese features (if theyexist)
High mortality Moderate mortality Low mortality
The range of tree species that could be planted is the same as for Scenario 2. The
continued persistence of western hemlock will be ensured by natural regeneration, even
without the protection of advance regeneration. Planting in clumps of less than 6 m
diameter would still be appropriate, though more regular planting patterns could be used.
Where possible, substantial volumes of CWD should be left throughout the harvesting
area. In areas that have been damaged by WHL, the arrangement of patches of different
retention levels should attempt to follow mortality patterns. In areas outside the outbreak
area they should be arranged relatively randomly. Minimum patch sizes should be
approximately 1 hectare.
Its likely long-term compositional and structural consequences have been outlined in
Table 8.
Recommendations
65
Table 8: Prognosis for Scenario 3
Element Prognosis
Canopy Trees • The creation of a horizontally stratified mix of structure types will maintain a largeproportion of within stand structural diversity.
• Long term persistence of a moderate density of snags, moderate density of survivingcanopy trees, some development of a second understorey layer and the rapiddevelopment of a regeneration layer.
• Rapid tree crown closure over the treated area. Some patchiness resulting fromunderstorey competition and falling snags in the reserve areas.
• Composition shifted from dominance by western hemlock. Moderate to highcomponents of species selected for planting.
• Future canopy trees will have lower live crown ratios and more cylindrical height todiameter ratios than those in Scenario 1. Majority of future canopy trees will displaylow proportions of decayed basal area.
Regeneration • High regeneration densities of a mix of species following planting. Regenerationdistributed relatively evenly across treatment area. Planting excluded from reservepatches.
• Long period of relatively low regeneration success once planted and currentlyexisting regeneration achieves canopy closure (as stands enter the stem exclusionphase).
• Gradual in-filling of any residual unoccupied patches in high retention areas thosespecies capable of surviving under low light conditions and regenerating onundisturbed forest floor.
Understorey • Development of the second understorey layer intentionally restricted to reserve areasonly.
• Understorey development in other areas would be suppressed once canopy closurewas achieved.
Dead WoodyMaterial
• Long term persistence of a moderate density of snags restricted to reserve areas.
• Large CWD loads in retained patches, with an attempt to maintain relatively highlevels of CWD throughout the remainder of the harvesting area.
Forest Floorand Soil
• Levels of soil and forest floor disturbance associated with normal harvestingoperations.
• Potential change in forest floor depth and humus form resulting from the changes intype and amount of litter input.
Recommendations
66
Risks
Some of the risks associated with Scenarios 1 and 2 would be alleviated in this scenario.
Regeneration success should be easier to guarantee. The potential for damage from
falling dead timber would be removed.
The risk of perpetuating the decay cycle would similar to that of Scenario 2.
The moderate levels of retention may pose some wind-throw hazard, but windthrow has
not proven to be a feature of other attempts at partial cutting in the ICH (Coates 1997,
Jull et al. 1999).
Incremental Silviculture
Incremental silviculture actions (thinning, pruning, fertilizing) will be unlikely to be
financially sensible in either Scenarios 1 or 2. There were no inherent features of WHL
disturbance that would prompt these types of action in Scenario 3. Decisions on
incremental silviculture would best be made on a stand by stand basis. The primary
decision criterion should be their respective merits in achieving stand management goals.
Monitoring the Implementation of Silviculture
These silviculture recommendations are provisional, based on existing knowledge at the
time of preparation of this report. Ecosystem management requires that an adaptive
approach be adopted when implementing management decision (Christensen et al. 1996).
This means that (Christensen et al. 1996):
• management must be based on the best current understanding of the ecosystem to be
managed
• the expectations of management actions must be clearly stated in operational terms
Recommendations
67
• and the results of management actions must be monitored and compared with
expectations.
Monitoring the fate of surviving ecosystem elements and regeneration should be
undertaken in all implemented treatments as an ongoing part of management. The results
of monitoring must be used to inform future management decisions.
Research Recommendations
A range of research recommendations follow from the analysis of this section of the
project’s data. These are:
• More accurate mapping of the 1990s WHL event to enable landscape analysis.
Analysis of the pattern of WHL disturbance should attempt to assess the validity of
the hypotheses advanced by Zammuto (1995).
• Search for pattern for ecosystem variables at larger scales than those examined in this
study. An appropriate starting point would be at scales of around 100 m. This would
be most efficiently achieved for many features (such as overstorey survival) by
careful analysis of existing large scale aerial photography.
• Completion of Stage 3 of the project. This stage will attempt to quantify periodicity
of WHL events, to assess similarity between events, and to place WHL in the context
of other forms of disturbance within the ICH of the Robson Valley.
Conclusion
68
Conclusion
It is apparent that the 1990s WHL outbreak had a large impact on a range of ecosystem
elements. This impact varied from stand to stand and even in relatively short distances
(less than 100 m) within stands.
It was also apparent that silviculture could be designed to preserve or create a range of
features associated with disturbance caused by WHL. The effects of WHL can be used as
a basis for silviculture that meets the requirements of ecosystem management. The
scenarios proposed in this report attempt to satisfy these requirements to varying degrees.
Associated with each were inherent risks and potential consequences for the provision of
both production and environmental values.
This report represents the best information concerning the effects of WHL on ecosystems
in the ICHwk3. It must be strongly emphasized, however, that it was based on just one
event. The similarity of this event to previous WHL outbreaks has not been assessed
(except superficially with an event in the 1950s). The study also contained no information
concerning periodicity of WHL (return interval for disturbance). The report could make
no recommendations on appropriate average level of annual forest disturbance. It was
strongly recommended that Stage 3 of this study be pursued in an attempt to address
these deficiencies.
The report contains information from only a part of data collected for this project.
Improved information will continue to become available as data analysis continues.
Conclusion
69
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank:
• Forestry Renewal BC, Zeidler Forest Industries, and State Forest of New South Wales
(Australia), all or which contributed to the funding of this research work.
• Staff at the BC Ministry of Forests Robson Valley office for frequent assistance and
support.
• Professor Emeritus Gordon Weetman of UBC for his comments on a draft of this
report.
• Tania Parkinson for innumerable hours of technical, administrative and editing
assistance.
70
Appendix 1 – Variables Measured in Each Plot
Plot Subplot VariablesIntensive Whole Trees:
• Species• Diameter• Height• Height to live crown• Canopy position• Decay class• Lean• Location (distance and direction from a known point)• Evidence of damaging agents (Using a rating system outlined
in Appendix 2)• Wildlife tree classification (using classification listed in
Appendix 3)Other features:• Type• Decay class• Size• Location
5 contiguous 5x5msubplots
Understorey:• Number of layer• Species in each layer• Percent cover by species in each layerSaplings:• Species• Status (live or dead, vertical or leaning)• Diameters (at 0.3 and 1.3 m)• Height• Location
11 contiguous 2x2msubplots
• Percent cover by moss species• Number of seedlings by species (seedling was considered any
individual of tree species of less than 1 cm diameter at 0.0mheight)
Randomly selectedsubsample of treesand saplings
Trees:• Diameter at 0.3 m height• Depth to decay in two directions• Core for growth increment measurements• Canopy width in four or three directions depending on canopy
positionSaplings:• Diameter at 0.0 m height• Depth to decay in two directions• Disc for growth increment measurements
71
Plot Subplot VariablesIntensive
ctd.Four twenty metrelong transects
Coarse woody debris (>10cm diameter at point of line):• Species• Diameter• Alignment• Slope• Presence of charcoal• Decay class
Extensive Whole plot As for intensive plot only no recording of evidence of damagingagents or wildlife tree classification
Nineteen 2x2msubplots placed at 5m intervals startingat x=5, y=0
Number by species of seedlingsCover of mossLive saplings:• Species• Diameter at 0.3 m height
Nineteen 5x5msubplots placed at 5m intervals startingat x=5, y=0
Understorey vegetation cover by layer
Nineteen pointsplaced at 5 mintervals starting atx=5, y=0
Canopy cover estimated by four readings from a canopydensiometerForest floor depth, estimated from four depth measurements on a 1metre long excavationCharcoal amount and continuity estimated for length of a 1 metrelong excavation
72
Appendix 2 – System for Classifying Evidence of
Damaging Agents
D F V Disease - conk visible
Bl Blind or swollen knot – pronounced swelling around knot, most often onhemlock
R Root
L Foliage
E Bole or branches external bark/sapwood only
It Bole or branches internal
K * Canker – caused by fungi, look for repeated callous growth, staining, resinimpregnation and fruiting bodies
I Df Insect - defoliation
T Bud damage
Ex Stem or branch damage including exit holes
Fi * Fire - scar
C W Co Charcoal on woody debris common
Is Isolated
G Co Charcoal in soil profile/forest floor common
Is Infrequent
We Up Weather – uprooted wind
B Broken wind
P Windthrown
Z * Lightning
X Frost
M * Mechanical – including falling trees, logging, rock
Up Uprooted
B Broken
P Knocked over whole
Bi * Biological – damage by woodpeckers, bears, deer, rodents, beavers etc.
U * Unknown
Xs Sh Shallow soil
Wt Wet soil
* S O Su Scar – open surface – exposed wood, damage to bark and cambium
De Deep – damage to wood below bark and cambium
Cl Closed – light to pronounced indentation, or pronounced scar tissue orcallous growth
B Broken
Mlt Multiple leader – list number of leaders
73
Appendix 3 – Summary of System for Classifying
Wildlife Tree Types14
Type Description Comments
WT1 Hard outer woodsurrounding decaysoftened inner wood
Substrate for excavating cavities for reproduction/resting for strongerexcavators – woodpeckers.
WT2 Outer and inner woodsoftened by decay
Substrate for excavating cavities for reproduction/resting for weakerexcavators – woodpeckers, chickadees, nuthatches.
WT3 Small excavated or naturalcavities (<6cm)
Small existing cavities for reproduction/resting – chickadees,nuthatches, swallows bats.
WT4 Large excavated or naturalcavities (6-12cm)
Large existing cavities for reproduction/resting – ducks, owls,bluebirds, swallows, bats, squirrels, mustelids.
WT5 Very large natural cavitiesand hollow trees (>12cm)
Very large existing cavities for reproduction/resting – swifts, owls,bats mustelids.
Hollow trees need some form of entrance to be included in this class.
WT6 Cracks, loose bark ordeeply furrowed bark
Other types of existing cavities for reproduction/resting – creepers,bats.
Must be sheltered from above.
WT7 Witches brooms Large open-nest supports and other non-cavity sites forreproduction/resting – diurnal raptors, owls, squirrels, mustelids.
WT8 Large branches, multipleleaders or large diameterbroken tops
Large open-nest supports and other non-cavity sites forreproduction/resting – herons, diurnal raptors and owls.
Platform needs to be in upper half of canopy height.
WT9 Arthropods in wood orunder bark
Feeding substrates – woodpeckers.
Only classify if fresh signs of insect feeding are present.
WT10 Open structured trees in oradjacent to open areas
Hunting perches – diurnal raptors, owls.
WT11 Large concealed spaces Large concealed spaces for reproduction/
resting/escape – grouse, hare, woodrat, porcupine, fox cats, somemustelid, bears.
Should be able to fit two fists into space.
WT12 Small concealed spacesabove ground level butbelow 1.3 m height
Small concealed spaces for reproduction/ resting/escape –salamander, toad, treefrog, snakes, wrens, shrews, voles, deer mouse,ground squirrel, chipmunk, jumping mice, weasels
14 From Keisker (1999)
74
Appendix 4 – Coarse Woody Debris Classification
System15
Class Description
Character 1 2 3 4 5 6
Bark Intact Mostlyintact
Sloughingor absent
Detached orabsent
Detached orabsent
Branchsystem
Currentyeartwigspresent
Largertwigspresent,branchsystementire
Largebranchespresent,longer thanlogdiameter
Branch stubspresent, shorterthan log diameter,branch stubs pullout
Absent
Structuralintegrity
Sound Sapwoodsomewhatdecayed;heartwoodmostlysound
Heartwoodmostlysound;supports itsownweight
Heartwood rotten,does not supportown weight, crosssection of the boleoval, branch stubspull out
None; woodresembles redpowder, withlittlediscerniblestructure orsigns of rings.
As for 5 onlygreater thanhalf verticaldiameterbelow surfaceof forest floor
Colour Original Original Original toreddishbrown
Reddish or lightbrown
Red-brown todark brown
Invadingroots
Absent Absent Sapwoodonly
Throughout Throughout
Veget-ation
None Coniferseedlingsgerminatebut do notsurvive
Tsuga <2m height;someshrubs andmosses
Tsuga < 15 cmdbh; smallershrubs; moss
Tsuga up to200 cm dbh;shrubs, somelarge; moss
15 From Triska and Cromack (1980)
75
Appendix 5 - Classification for Snags16
Stage Features Fallen Analog
1 Live
2 Declining
3 Recently dead – branch structure including fine branches still largely
intact
I
4 Loose bark – bark loose, branches <3 cm generally absent II
5 Clean – no bark, generally only branch stubs II, III
6 Broken – top broken off III
7 Decomposed – bole starting to disintegrate due to biodeterioration,
chunks of bole broken off
IV
8 Down material – bole almost completely disintegrated, down
material partly to largely submerged
V
9 Stump – only stump obvious, fallen material submerged V
16 From Caza (1993)
76
Appendix 5 – Correlation Between Variables at the Plot Level
Dea
d B
asal
Are
a pe
r Ha
Mea
n %
Dea
d C
over
Tot
al B
asal
Are
a pe
r Ha
% B
asal
Are
a Su
rviv
ing
Out
brea
k
Mea
n %
Liv
e C
over
Mea
n %
Gap
Mea
n %
Mos
s C
over
Den
sity
of W
T1
Tot
al D
ensi
ty o
fR
egen
erat
ion
Mea
n %
Und
erst
orey
Cov
er L
ayer
1
Mea
n %
Und
erst
orey
Cov
er L
ayer
2
Mea
n D
BH
of L
ive
Tre
es in
Can
opy
Lay
er 1
Mea
n H
eigh
t of L
ive
Tre
es in
Can
opy
Lay
er 1
Mea
n H
eigh
t of L
ive
Cro
wn
Tre
es in
Can
opy
Lay
er 1
Density of WT1 -0.630 0.674 -0.611
Total Density of Regeneration 0.705
Mean % Understorey Cover Layer 2 0.667 0.709 -0.608 -0.651 -0.634 -0.736
% Decayed Basal Area in Canopy Layer 1 0.670 -0.740 0.630
% Decayed Basal Area in Canopy Layer 2 -0.704 -0.872 0.640
Density of Tress in Canopy Layer 1 0.861
Mean DBH of Live Trees in Canopy Layer 1 -0.670 0.664
Mean Height of Live Trees in Canopy Layer 1 -0.694 -0.716 0.644
Mean Height to DBH Ratio for Trees in CanopyLayer 1
-0.851 -0.619
Mean Height of Live Crown Trees in Canopy Layer 1 0.629 0.633 -0.613 0.665
Mean Live Crown Ratio of Trees in Canopy Layer 1 -0.646 0.639 0.618 0.698 -0.609
Variables that displayed a simple correlation of greater than 0.600 when plot level results were analyzed. Those correlations that were
considered trivial have been omitted from the table. Variables considered in the analysis have been listed below.
77
Correlation Between Variables ctd.
Wes
tern
Red
ceda
r Tot
alB
asal
Are
a(H
a)
Wes
tern
Hem
lock
Tot
alB
asal
Are
a(H
a)
Wes
tern
Red
ceda
r Liv
eB
asal
Are
a(H
a)
Wes
tern
Hem
lock
Liv
eB
asal
Are
a(H
a)
Total Live Basal Area (Ha) 0.880
Total Basal Area (Ha) 0.912 -0.606 0.771
% Total Basal Area Surviving 0.720
Western Redcedar Total Basal Area (Ha) -0.872 -0.621
Western Hemlock Total Basal Area (Ha) -0.872 -0.745
Mean % Canopy Cover of Live Trees 0.625
Mean % Canopy Cover of Dead Trees -0.642
Mean % Moss Cover -0.651 0.790
Mean Density of WT1 -0.779 0.742 -0.723
Mean Density of Regeneration 0.795
Mean % Understorey Cover Layer 1 0.658 -0.601
% Decayed Basal Area in Canopy Layer 1 0.762 -0.697
% Decayed Basal Area in Canopy Layer 2 -0.867
% Decayed Basal Area in Canopy Layer 3 -0.651
Mean DBH of Live Trees in Canopy Layer 1 0.686
Mean Height of Live Trees in Canopy Layer 1 0.621 0.731
Variables that displayed a simple correlation of greater than 0.600 when plot level results
were analyzed. Those correlations that were considered trivial have been omitted from
the table. Variables considered in the analysis have been listed below.
78
Variables Considered in the Simple Correlation Analysis
• Dead, Live and Total Basal Area per Hectare
• Mean percent Basal Area Surviving WHL Outbreak
• Total and Live Basal Area for Western Redcedar and Western Hemlock
• Mean percent Live, Gap and Dead Cover
• Mean Forest Floor Depth
• Mean Moss Cover
• Mean Volume of CWD per Hectare
• Mean Density per Hectare of WT1, WT2, WT6, WT8, and WT11
• Total Density of Regeneration per Hectare
• Mean percent Cover Layer 1, and Layer 2 Understorey
• Density per Hectare, Mean DBH, Mean Height, Mean Height to Daimeter Ratio of
Dead Trees in Canopy Layer 1
• Density per Hectare, Mean DBH, Mean Height, and Mean Height to Diameter Ratio
of Dead Trees in Canopy Layer 1
• Density per Hectare, Mean DBH, Mean Height, Mean Height to Diameter Ratio,
Mean Height to Live Crown, and Mean Live Crown Ratio of Live Trees in Canopy
Layer 1
79
Appendix 6 – Examples of Results of the Three Different
Types of Spatial Analysis
Descriptive Analysis
Appendix 7: Graph 1 - Canopy cover by class at 5 m intervals along a 100 m
transect
80
Appendix 7: Graph 2 – Live and dead basal areas for all trees at 5 m intervals along
a 100 m transect
81
Appendix 7: Graph 3 - Understorey cover by layer at 5 m intervals along a 100 m
transect
82
Appendix 7: Graphs 4 and 5: - Plots of tree location and height for trees > 10 cm
dbhob in the extensive plot. Diameter has been indicated by the relative size of the
triangle. Grey triangles represent dead trees, and green live.
83
Correlation Analysis
Appendix 7: Graph 5 - Correlation between the basal area of subcanopy trees and
all other variables
84
Appendix 7: Graph 7 - Correlation between the average height of canopy trees and
all other variables
85
Intensity Analysis
Appendix 7: Graph 8 - Intensity of subcanopy trees along a 10x100m plot
86
Appendix 7: Graph 9 - Intensity of regeneration along in a 5x25m subplot
87
K-Function Analysis
Appendix 7: Graph 10 - K-function analysis for western hemlock trees showing
evidence of clustering
The simulated pattern lines in the k-function analysis represent the minimum and
maximum values given by the random pattern simulations for each distance. In this case,
25 simulations were used. The minimum value plotted for any distance was the lowest
value of khat for that distance from the 25 point pattern simulations that were conducted.
Observed values of k that fall above the upper line indicate aggregation at that scale when
compared to a random point pattern. Values that fall below the lower line indicate
regularity when compared to a random point pattern.
88
Appendix 7: Graph 11 - K-function analysis for all canopy trees in IN06. The plot
shows evidence of regular distribution
89
Appendix 7: Graph 12 - K-function analysis for saplings showing evidence of
clustered distribution at distances of less than 4 m.
90
Appendix 7: Graph 13 - K-function analysis for saplings showing evidence of
clustered distribution at distances of less than 6 m.
91
References
Anon. 1995. Silvicultural Systems Guidebook . British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria B.C.
Anon. 1996. Draft Field Guide Insert for Site Identification and Interpretation for the Rocky MountainTrench. B.C. Ministry of Forests and Lands, Victoria.
Arsenault, A. 1998. Disturbance ecology in forests of the Interior Cedar-Hemlock Zone. Pages 16-17 in M.Jull, D. Coxson, S. Stevenson, D. Lousier, and M. Walters, eds. Ecosystem Dynamics andSilviculture Systems in Interior Wet-belt ESSF and ICH Forests. UNBC Press, University ofNorthern British Columbia, Prince George.
Bunnell, F. L., L. L. Kremsater, and M. Boyland. 1998. An Ecological Rationale for Changing ForestManagement on MacMillan Bloedel's Forest Tenure. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Camenzind, W. G. 1989. The Review of Silvicultural Systems and Their Applicability to the Prince RupertForest Region Interior Subzones. R. J. A. Forestry Ltd., Smithers, B.C.
Cameron, I. R. 1998. Stand Reconstruction in the Mixed-Species Stands of the Interior Cedar-HemlockZone. Pages 34-36 in M. Jull, D. Coxon, S. Stevenson, D. Lousier, and M. Walters, eds.Ecosystem Dynamics and Silviculture Systems in Interior Wet-belt ESSF and ICH Forests. UNBCPress, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George.
Cameron, I. R. undated. Vertical Stratification in Some 50-year-old Mixed-species Stands in the InteriorCedar-Hemlock Zone. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Kamloops Forest Region, Kamloops.
Caza, C. L. 1993. Woody Debris in the Forests of British Columbia: A Review of the Literature andCurrent Research. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C.
Christensen, N. L., A. M. Bartuska, J. H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J. F. Franklin, J.A. MacMahon, R. F. Noss, D. J. Parsons, C. H. Peterson, M. G. Turner, and R. G. Woodmansee.1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis forecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6: 665-691.
Coates, D. K. 1997. Windthrow damage 2 years after partial cutting at the Date Creek silvicultural systemsstudy in the Interior Cedar-Hemlock forests of northwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journalof Forestry Research 27: 1695-1701.
Coates, K. D. 1998. Tree Species Response to Gap Formation in Partially-Cut Interior Cedar-HemlockForest of Northwestern British Columbia. Pages 193. Faculty of Graduate Studies. Univerisity ofBritish Columbia, Vancouver.
Coxson, D. 1996. Forest Canopy Processes and Partial-Cutting Silvicultural Systems in Northern Wet-BeltForests. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George.
Cressie, N. A. C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Engelhardt, N. T. 1957. Pathological deterioration of looper-killed western hemlock on southern VancouverIsland. Forest Science 3: 125-136.
Florence, R. G. 1996. Ecology and Silviculture of Eucalypt Forests. CSIRO Australia, Collingwood.
92
Galindo-Leal, C., and F. L. Bunnell. 1995. Ecosystem Management: Implications and opportunities for anew paradigm. The Forestry Chronicle 71: 601-606.
Gerlach, L. P., and D. N. Bengston. 1994. If Ecosystem Management is the solution, what's the problem? :Eleven challenges for Ecosystem Management. Journal of Forestry 92: 18-21.
Haeussler, S., D. Coates, and J. Mather. 1990. Autecology of Common Plants in British Columbia: ALiterature Review. Forestry Canada and B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria.
Hoggett, A. unpublished-a. Do disturbance agents leave their mark? The historical importance of westernhemlock looper in the ICH ecosystems of the Robson Valley. Pages 36, Faculty of Forestry,University of British Columbia.
Hoggett, A. unpublished-b. Hemlock Looper, Harvesting and Old Growth: Implications of natural standdynamics for forest management in the Robson Valley ICH. Pages 11, Faculty of Forestry,University of British Columbia.
Hoggett, A. unpublished-c. Western Hemlock Looper and Forest Disturbance
in the ICH wk3 of the Robson Valley: Stage 1 - Known Disturbance History. Faculty of Forestry,University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Johnson, N. E., K. R. Shea, and R. L. Johnsey. 1970. Mortality and deterioration of looper-killed hemlockin western Washington. Journal of Forestry March 1970: 162-163.
Jull, M., S. Stevenson, and B. Sagar. 1999. Group Selection in Old Cedar Hemlock Forests: Five-yearResults of the Fleet Creek Partial-cutting Trial. Forest Service of British Columbia, University ofNorthern British Columbia, Prince George.
Kaufmann, M. R., R. T. Graham, D. A. B. Jr., W. H. Moir, L. Perry, R. T. Reynolds, R. L. Bassett, P.Mehlhop, C. B. Edminster, W. M. Block, and P. S. Corn. 1994. An ecological basis for ecosystemmanagement. U.S Department of Agriculture General Technical Report RM-246, Colorado.
Kay, C. E. 1995. Aboriginal overkill and native burning: Implications for modern Ecosystem Management.Western Journal of Applied Forestry 10: 121-126.
Keisker, D. G. 1999. Types of Wildlife Trees and Coarse Woody Debris Required by Wildlife of North-Central British Columbia, Quesnel, B.C.
Kimmins, H. 1993. Nature as a guide to forest management: the roles of ecology. Environmentalism andgreen religion in defining a new paradigm for forestry. Pages 5-9. Canadian Institute of ForestryAnnual Meeting, Montreal.
Kinghorn, J. M. 1954. The influence of stand composition on the mortality of various conifers, caused bydefoliation by the western hemlock looper in Vancouver Island, British Columbia. The ForestryChronicle 54: 380-400.
Nyland, R. D. 1996. Silviculture: Concepts and Applications. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., NewYork.
Oliver, C. D., and B. C. Larson. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Parfett, N., I. S. Otvos, and A. V. Sickle. 1995. Historical Western Hemlock Looper Outbreaks in BritishColumbia: Input and Analysis Using a Geographic Information System. Canadian Forestry Serviceand British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria.
93
Parminter, J. 1998. Natural Disturbance Ecology. Pages 3-35 in J. Voller and S. Harrison, eds.Conservation Biology Principles for Forested Landscapes. UBC Press, Vancouver.
Peterson, E. B., G. F. Weetman, and N. M. Peterson. 1998a. Silvical Characteristics of Western Redcedarand Western Hemlock In the ICH Zone in British Columbia, and Summaries of SilviculturalConsiderations for Four Groups of ICH Subzones. Western Ecological Services Ltd., Victoria,B.C.
Peterson, E. B., G. F. Weetman, and N. M. Peterson. 1998b. Silvical Information on Western Redcedar andWestern Hemlock for British Columbia's ICH Zone Silviculture Guides. Western EcologicalServices Ltd., Victoria, B.C.
Peterson, E. B., G. F. Weetman, and N. M. Peterson. 1998c. Silvics of Western Redcedar and WesternHemlock in British Columbia's ICH Zone, and Decision Aids for Their Silviculture. WesternEcological Services Ltd., Victoria, B.C.
Pickett, S. T. A., S. L. Collins, and J. J. Armesto. 1987. A hierarchial consideration of causes andmechanisms of succession. Vegetatio 69: 109-114.
Pojar, J., K. Klinka, and D. Meidinger. 1987. Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification in British Columbia.Forest Ecology and Management 22: 119-154.
Robinson, B., and I. Moss. 1990. Acceptability of western hemlock and western redcedar in the ICHvk2(ICHf) - A preliminary investigation. Industrial Forestry Service Ltd.
Smith, D. M. 1986. The Practice of Silviculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian System of Soil Classification. National ResearchCouncil of Canada, Ottawa.
Stevenson, S., B. Bancroft , and M. Jull. 1995. Can We Log and Maintain Caribou Habitat in the ICH? -The Robson Valley Partial Cutting Project. British Columia Ministies of Environment and Forests,Victoria.
Taylor, S. unpublished. Western Hemlock Looper and its Impacts. British Columbia Ministry of Forests,Prince George Forests Region, Prince George.
Thomas, J. W. 1994. Trends in forest management in the United States. The Forestry Chronicle 70: 546-549.
Triska, F. J., and K. Cromack. 1980. The role of wood in forests and streams. Pages 171-190 in R. H.Waring, ed. Forests: Fresh perspectives from ecosystem analysis. Oregon State University Press,Corvallis.
Weetman, G. F. 1996. Are European Silvicultural Systems and Precedents Useful for British ColumbiaSilviculture Prescriptions?
Weetman, G. F., E. Panozzo, M. Jull, and K. Marek. 1990. An Assessment of Opportunities for AlternativeSilvicultural Systems in the SBS, ICH, and ESSF Biogeoclimatic Zones of the Prince RupertForest Region. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Smithers, B.C.
Zammuto, R. 1995. General Discussion on Hemlock Looper Attack: Upper Fraser River. See MeConsultations, Ltd., Crescent Spur, British Columbia.