what funders need to know
DESCRIPTION
Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa. What Funders Need to Know. Prepared by the Community Service Council March 2012. Eight Sources ……. Lack of mass employment with living wage for unskilled/low-skilled persons and growing income insecurities contributing widespread consumer debt - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
WHAT FUNDERS NEED TO KNOW
Commissioned by JumpStart Tulsa
Prepared by the Community Service CouncilMarch 2012
EIGHT SOURCES …… Lack of mass employment with living wage for
unskilled/low-skilled persons and growing income insecurities contributing widespread consumer debt
Growing workforce shortage Rapid aging of the population Growing challenges to healthy lifestyles
and access to quality health care Continued cultural and ethnic changes Changing environmental conditions
and water insecurities Uncertainty of future energy supply Growing challenges to American culture and
identity
Dem
ogra
phic
s
THREE TRENDS……
Demographic disparity Education and employment gap Fraying of the safety net for
everyone
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends for Total Population and Under Age 5Tusla County, 1980 through 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1980, 1990 & 2000 Censuses; Population Estimates Program.
1980 1990 2000 2008(est.)
2010(proj.)
2020(proj.)
2030(proj.)
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Under age 5 36,714 38,835 41,434 48,035 40,733 41,651 41,573Total Population 470,593 503,341 563,299 591,982 598,876 631,433 658,541
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, & 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.
6.3
6.6
6.8
7.4
7.7
7.7
8.5
16.6
17.1
18.2
18.9
18.4
19.8
25.9
9.2
9.7
10.1
10
10.1
13.5
10.7
47.8
50.5
52.5
51.9
52.2
49.1
46.2
17.5
14.1
10.6
10.4
10.4
9
8.1
2030
2020
2010
2000
1990
1980
1970
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of population0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+
1.9
1.4
1.2
.9
.6
Pr o
ject
i ons 2.5
2.1
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Dem
ogra
phic
sRace Comparison for Total Population and Children under 5
Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2010
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.
59.3%
8.2%11.0%
1.6%
19.8%54.9%
12.6%
7.3%2.5%
22.8%
72.2%
7.4%
8.6%
1.7%
10.1%69.2%
10.7%
6.0%
2.3%
11.7%
White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races
Oklahoma Tulsa County
Under 5
Total Population
N = 591,982
N = 48,035N = 266,547
N = 3,642,361
Hispanic16.8%
Hispanic20.6%
Hispanic8.9%
Hispanic11.0%
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2005-07 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 Censuses; US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2005-07.
Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005-07 est.
1970 82% 1% 11% 4%1980 74% 2% 16% 6%1990 71% 3% 18% 5%2000 65% 5% 21% 7%
2005-07 est. 61% 6% 25% 8%
Children living with 1 or both parents
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Children
Tulsa County, 2005-09
Source: US Census Bureau, 2005-09 American Community Survey.
Total population Under 18 Under 6 6-170%
25%
50%
75%
Percentage of population
Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%
Below 100% 19.8% 22.2% 26.8% 19.6%Below 185% 41.6% 42.1% 47.9% 38.7%Below 200% 45.4% 45.4% 51.1% 42.1%
EC
ON
OM
ICS
& E
MP
LOY
ME
NT
Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2010*
Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; 2009 HHS Poverty Guidelines, Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 14, January 23, 2009, p. 4200; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-08 American Community Survey.
$73,324
$52,870
$36,832
$10,309$15,312 $18,310
$33,874
$21,551
WelfareWage
MinimumWage
PovertyWage
185% PovertyWage
Median FamilyIncome
(2006-08 ACS)
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000Annual Wage
Self-Sufficiency Wage = $39,978 ($18.93/hr)
Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income
($4.88/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($8.67/hr) ($16.04/hr)
Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. The 2009 poverty guidelines are being used until at least March 1, 2010. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC.
Married-couple families w/ children <18($34.72/hr)
All families w/ children <18
Male-headed families w/ children <18
Female-headed families w/ children <18
($17.44/hr)
($25.03/hr)
($10.20/hr)
Econ
omic
s &
Em
ploy
men
t
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating
Tulsa County, 2011
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, June 2011; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2010-11; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, August 2011.
129,750
73,002
4,152
9,972
4,231
87,852
2,533
31,732
4,946
21.5%
44.9%
47.1%
22.3%
9.5%
14.6%
1.6%
52.8%
8.2%
Soonercare Total (185%/100%) (8/11)
Soonercare <19 (185%) (8/11)
WIC Infants (185%) (8/11)
WIC age 1-5 (185%) (8/11)
Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%) 6/11)
SNAP Total (130%) (6/11)
TANF <18 (50%) (6/11)
Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)(SY 2010-11)
Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)(SY 2010-11)
050,000100,000150,000
Number of Participants
0% 20% 40% 60%
Percent of Population
Econ
omic
s &
Em
ploy
men
t
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & OlderTulsa County, 2006-08 Estimates
Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2006-08.
15.1%
33%
22.8%
6.7%
15.1%
5.1%
1.4%
0.8%
Less than high school
High school graduate
Some college
Associate degree
Bachelor's degree
Master's degree
Professional school degree
Doctorate degree
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%Percent of persons 25+
Econ
omic
s &
Em
ploy
men
t
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Unemployment RatesTulsa County and Tulsa MSA, 1990 - 2011
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 July2011
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Tulsa Co. 4.3 5.1 5.6 6.1 5.4 4.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.8 3.3 5.0 6.0 4.9 4.2 3.9 3.8 3.6 6.8 7.6 6.2Tulsa MSA 4.8 5.7 6.0 6.4 5.8 4.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.5 2.9 3.4 5.0 6.1 5.1 4.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 7.1 7.9 6.4
Econ
omic
s &
Em
ploy
men
t
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and Oklahoma, 2008
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.
12.1%
43.9%
8%
23.2%
7%
1.8%
31.5%
17.6%
12.2%
13.7%
42.3%
5.4%
21.4%
6.9%
1.4%
34.8%
20.5%
11%
Teen mother(age 15-19)
Unmarried mother
Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)
Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation
Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)
Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)
Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)
Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)
Premature(<37 weeks gest.)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%Percent of Births
Tulsa Co.Oklahoma
Tulsa County births: 9,530 Oklahoma births: 54,753
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Infant Mortality RatesTulsa County and Oklahoma, 1980 through 2007
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
5
10
15Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births
Tulsa County Oklahoma
Tulsa County 10.412.3 1010.7 9.810.7 9.9 8.8 10.4 9.5 9 9.2 8.3 10.3 9.7 9.3 9.1 6.9 6.9 7.1 9 7 8.8 7.5 6.6 8.2 8.7 9.4Oklahoma 12.311.411.910.310.210.6 9.9 9.2 8.7 8.1 9 9.3 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.4 7.4 8.5 8.5 8.4 7.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 8.1 8 8.6
From 2003 through 2007, there was an average of 77 infant deaths per year in Tulsa County, for a rate of 8.1 per 1,000 live births. In Oklahoma, the average was 425 infant deaths, for a rate of 8.1.
“Healthy People 2010” goal = 5 per 1,000
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Average Daily Membership and Percentage of Children Enrolled in Special Education, by School District
Tulsa County County, School Year 2008-09
Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Education Oversight Board, Office of Accountability, Profiles 2009 Reports.
Berryhill Bixby BrokenArrow
Collinsville Glenpool Jenks Keystone Liberty Owasso SandSprings
Skiatook Sperry Tulsa Union0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000ADM
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%Percent in Special Education
ADM % Spec. Ed.
ADM 1,230 4,623 16,193 2,544 2,379 9,982 423 594 8,698 5,431 2,525 1,280 41,195 14,658% Spec. Ed. 8.5% 14.4% 14.4% 11.8% 12.9% 14.8% 16.3% 18.2% 11% 13.5% 13.1% 12.3% 14.6% 10%
Tulsa County total ADM = 111,755; percentage in special education = 13.4%
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
DHS Licensed Child Care Services Provided to Children Under Age 5, by Age
Tulsa County, October 2001 - October, 2010
Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Monthly Statistical Bulletins.
October2001
October2002
October2003
October2004
October2005
October2006
October2007
October2008
October2009
October2010
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Age <1 530 648 709 696 758 739 622 586 604 532Age 1 1,010 1,012 1,029 1,128 1,019 1,016 989 909 882 941Age 2 1,098 1,182 1,162 1,201 1,158 1,106 1,067 1,039 1,020 1,022Age 3 1,117 1,111 1,168 1,234 1,145 1,080 1,076 1,052 1,014 1,043Age 4 975 1,020 989 1,150 1,019 931 961 893 870 859
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2007
Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.
75
12 13
1821
16 16
24
31
2325
18
38
2023
3134
29
4245
47 48
3835
27
51
40
32
39
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Child
Indi
cato
rs
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT In Tulsa County in FY 2009, there were 3,933 reports of child abuse
and/or neglect accepted for investigation or assessment. 6,583 children were involved in these reports (duplicated count).
1,248 children were confirmed victims of child abuse and/or neglect. 89 were abused, 992 were neglected, 167 were victims of both abuse and neglect.
Eight of every 1,000 children in Tulsa County are victims of abuse and/or neglect. In Oklahoma, the rate is 10 of every 1,000 children.
Oklahoma ranks #35 in the nation in the rate of children who are victims of abuse and/or neglect.
Parents make up 73.7% of all perpetrators, followed by “no relation” at 6.9%, step-parents at 5.9%, and grandparents at 3.5%.
Substance abuse is a major contributing factor to child neglect.
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
47.8%
22%
9.9%
22.2%
26.5%
17.5%
30.6%
40.5%
18.7%
7.1%
18.4%
28.6%
12.3%
25.8%
43.1%
15.9%
5.5%
19.1%
23.2%
13.3%
26.8%
39%
17.2%
4.8%
16.8%
22.6%
11%
23.1%
44.7%
19.7%
4.4%
22.3%
20%
10.5%
29.1%
Alcohol
Marijuana
Methamphetamine
Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school
Smoked cigarettesduring past month
Drove after drinkingalcohol in past month
Rode with drinkingdriver in past month
0% 20%40%60%80%100%
2003 Oklahoma2005 Oklahoma2007 Oklahoma2009 Oklahoma2007 US
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007
Used once or more during past 30 days...
Ever used...
Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.
50%
5.8%
64.3%
17.7%
7%
14.2%
49.3%
6.5%
61.7%
16.4%
7.9%
15.9%
38.2%
50.9%
5.8%
59.6%
16.7%
5.9%
15.2%
49.6%
51.1%
4.7%
56.7%
22.7%
7%
16.4%
47.4%
47.8%
7.1%
61.5%
16%
6.9%
15.8%
34.7%
Ever hadsexual intercourse
Had sex before age 13
Used condom last time
Used birth controlpills last time
Attempted suicidein past year
Overweight(according to BMI)
Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2003 Oklahoma2005 Oklahoma2007 Oklahoma2009 Oklahoma2007 US
Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health
High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2009, and U.S., 2007
Note: National 2009 YRBSS data have not yet been released.
na
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Per
c ent
adu
lts re
por ti
ng fa
ir or
poo
r hea
lth
0
10
20
30
40
50
State rank
Oklahoma Rank US
Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7%Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42
US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4%
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Per
c ent
of p
opul
atio
n es
tima t
ed to
be
obes
e
0
10
20
30
40
50
State rank
Oklahoma Rank US
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Prevalence of SmokingOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2009
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
c ent
of p
opul
atio
n ov
er 1
8 th
at s
mok
e re
g ula
rly
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
State rank
Oklahoma Rank US
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2007-2008
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation.
1,714,100 (48.5%)
156,600 (4.4%)505,000 (14.3%)
590,500 (16.7%)
564,700 (16.0%)
456,300 (47.0%)
38,900 (4.0%)
337,000 (34.7%)
38,600 (4.0%)101,000 (10.4%)
1,255,500 (60.6%)
114,800 (5.5%)
146,300 (7.1%)
96,800 (4.7%)
457,500 (22.1%)
2,300 (0.5%)2,900 (0.6%)21,700 (4.4%)
455,100 (93.2%)
6,200 (1.3%)
Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare/Other Public Uninsured
Total Population Under Age 19
Age 19-64 Age 65 & over
Child
Indi
cato
rs
Prepared by the Community Service Council of Greater Tulsa
Oklahoma’s Prison PopulationFiscal Years 1950 - 2008
Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2008
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000Prison population
Cri
me
& In
carc
erat
ion
Oklahoma's Rankings in Health Outcomes, 2010According to United Health Foundation's State Health Rankings
Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“
#48
#46
#21
#44
#48
#40
#46
#46
Poor mental health days
Poor physical health days
Geographic disparity
Infant mortality
Cardiovascular deaths
Cancer deaths
Premature death
All Health Outcomes
#0 #10 #20 #30 #40 #50
1990 2010
Ranking: 1=best, 50=worst
Oklahoma’s overall health ranking for 2010 is # 46
HE
AL
TH
IN
DIC
AT
OR
S
54% met demand
35% anticipate meeting demand
…IN SUMMARY