what is machine design
TRANSCRIPT
Machine Design: Machine Design: An OverviewAn Overview
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Introduction: What is Machine Design?Introduction: What is Machine Design? Machine Design: Research AreasMachine Design: Research Areas Research Applications:Research Applications:
– Gear Tooth FEM/FEA and Optimization– Machine Design Optimization– Customized Knee Implant: Design, Stress
Analysis and Manufacturing
Introduction: Introduction: What is Machine Design?What is Machine Design?
Core of mechanical Core of mechanical engineeringengineering– Stress and strain– Designing for safety– Static failure theories– Fatigue failure
theories– Machine elements– Mechanical material
properties
– Stress Concentrations– Fracture Mechanics– Optimization– Composite Materials– Manufacturing
Processes– Computer Aided
Machine Design and Analysis
– Measuring Stress and Strain
Stress and strainStress and strain– Normal stresses and strains– Shear stresses and strains– Principal stresses and strains– Mohr’s circle and analytical relationships
Introduction: Stress and StrainIntroduction: Stress and Strain
τ
σσ1σ2σ3
222,1 )
2(
2 xyyxyx
22max )
2( xy
yx
yx
xy
2
)2tan(
θ σx
σy
τxy
Introduction: Static FailureIntroduction: Static Failure Ductile BehaviorDuctile Behavior
– Maximum Shear-Stress Theory (Tresca/Coulomb/Guest Theory)
– Distortion Energy Theory (von Mises)
Brittle Behavior (even and uneven materials)Brittle Behavior (even and uneven materials)– Coulomb-Mohr Theory
FS
Sσσ y
31
FS
S)σ(σ)σ(σ)σ(σ
2
2σ y2
132
322
21eff
σ
τ
Compression
test Tension
test
σ1
σ3Sut, Sut
Sut, -Sut
Sut, -Sut
-Sut, Sut-Suc, Sut
uneven
Introduction: Fatigue FailureIntroduction: Fatigue Failure Alternating and mean stressAlternating and mean stress Stress-Life ApproachStress-Life Approach
– High Cycle Fatigue Criteria– Load amplitude is consistent– Common for rotating machinery
Strain-Life Approach Strain-Life Approach – Low cycle fatigue (<103)– Variations in loads and high
temperatures– Common for service machinery
Fracture Mechanics ApproachFracture Mechanics Approach– Low cycle fatigue– Generally used to determine remaining
life of a cracked part– Paris equation
nKAdN
da)( n,A: empirical values
K: stress intensity factor
t
103 104 106 107105
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.4
Corrected endurance limit:Se=CloadCsizeCsurfCtempCreliabSe‘
Corrected fatigue strengthSf=CloadCsizeCsurfCtempCreliabSf'
Introduction: Introduction: Machine ElementsMachine Elements
Springs Springs FastenersFasteners Bearings Bearings Shafts Shafts GearsGears
Machined Universal Joint Coiled
Machine Design: Machine Design: Research AreasResearch Areas
Finite Element AnalysisFinite Element Analysis Design OptimizationDesign Optimization BiomechanicsBiomechanics NanotechnologyNanotechnology Fracture MechanicsFracture Mechanics Mechanical Material PropertiesMechanical Material Properties Composite MaterialsComposite Materials Designing for ManufacturingDesigning for Manufacturing Welding Welding
Research Applications:Research Applications: Gear tooth stress analysis and measurementGear tooth stress analysis and measurement
– Typical component studied in machine design Finite element modeling and analysis Stress measurement using polariscope
Machine Design OptimizationMachine Design Optimization– Improve performance, reduce mass, stress and cost
Missile design Optimization theory
Customized Knee Implant:Customized Knee Implant:– Hinge joint
Design to even out stress, remove areas of stress concentration Finite element analysis Manufacturing
Gear Tooth: IntroductionGear Tooth: Introduction Gear is a typical component studied in machine designGear is a typical component studied in machine design In analyzing the stresses in gears one uses stress/strain and In analyzing the stresses in gears one uses stress/strain and
failure theoriesfailure theories The stresses were measured using a polariscopeThe stresses were measured using a polariscope Objective:Objective: minimize stress at the root of a gear tooth by minimize stress at the root of a gear tooth by
introducing a stress relief holeintroducing a stress relief hole Parameters: location (r, Parameters: location (r, θ)θ) and size of hole and size of hole Analytical model: I-DEAS Master Series Analytical model: I-DEAS Master Series
– Solid Model, FEA, Optimization, .stl file Experimental analysis to validate analytical model
– Stereolithography model, Polariscope
Gear Tooth: Two Gears MeshingGear Tooth: Two Gears Meshing
Gear Tooth: Two Gears MeshingGear Tooth: Two Gears Meshing
Gear Tooth: Solid Model CreationGear Tooth: Solid Model Creation
Involute and gear created in I-DEASInvolute and gear created in I-DEAS Simplifications: no fillets, one toothSimplifications: no fillets, one tooth
– Pitch Diameter = 360 mm– Number of teeth = 30– Pressure angle = 20o
– Addendum = 12 mm– Dedendum = 15 mm– Gear thickness = 5 mm– Circular tooth thickness = 18.85 mm
Gear Tooth: FEAGear Tooth: FEA
Results: original model Results: original model – Band of high max principal stress– Max tensile stress – Area of concern
Crack propagation Fatigue failure
begins at a crack
Load
MaxTensile Stress
Gear Tooth: FEAGear Tooth: FEA MeshMesh
– Triangular shell elements– With and without hole– Partitions– Free locals – mesh control
Boundary conditionsBoundary conditions– Cantilever beam approx.
Load: along 20Load: along 20o o pressure pressure lineline
Gear Tooth: OptimizationGear Tooth: Optimization Objective: Minimize stressObjective: Minimize stress Design Variables:Design Variables:
– Hole diameter – Angular location– Radial location
ConstraintsConstraints– Displacement restraints
Algorithm: Algorithm: Fletcher-Reeves optimization algorithm– Gradient based, improved steepest descent method
– Xq = Xq-1 + Sq Initial search direction is the steepest decent: -F(Xq) Sq = -F(Xq)+qSq-1
q = | F (Xq) |2 / | F (Xq-1) |2
Gear Tooth:Gear Tooth: Optimized Hole Optimized Hole LocationLocation
θ=29o
r = 4 mmdiameter =2 mm
Gear Tooth: Stereolithography Gear Tooth: Stereolithography Model CreationModel Creation
Stereolithography machine SLA-250Stereolithography machine SLA-250–Laser cured one layer at a time–Thickness: 0.006 inch (103 layers)–Material: SL5170–Ultraviolet oven for 45 min
Models created in 15 hoursModels created in 15 hours–With and without hole
Boundary Condition Holes
Stress Relief Hole
Support Structure
Gear Tooth: Experimental Gear Tooth: Experimental SetupSetup
Experimental study to verify FEAExperimental study to verify FEA A flange with holes for mounting was A flange with holes for mounting was
added to the models to hold the parts in added to the models to hold the parts in place in the polariscopeplace in the polariscope– Compression force was applied– Bracket was used to distribute the force
Circular polariscope dark fieldCircular polariscope dark field was usedwas used– Used to analyze stress in 2D models
Gear Tooth: Circular Gear Tooth: Circular PolariscopePolariscope
Gear Tooth: Isochromatic FringesGear Tooth: Isochromatic Fringes
Extinction of light of a particular wave lengths Extinction of light of a particular wave lengths (colored light)(colored light)
Determines the magnitude of the stress differenceDetermines the magnitude of the stress difference– n = hc/*(1- 2)
n: fringe order hc/: constants 1- 2: stress difference
black yellow red | blue yellow red | green yellow red | black yellow red | blue yellow red | green yellow red | green yellow red | g y r | ...green yellow red | g y r | ...
Gear Tooth: Comparison of Gear Tooth: Comparison of Fringes With and Without HoleFringes With and Without Hole
Gear Tooth:Gear Tooth:Stress ResultsStress Results
101 kPa 85.7 kPa (15% decrease)
Gear Tooth: Gear Tooth: Deflection ResultsDeflection Results
12.9 nm 13.2 nm2.3% difference
Gear Tooth: Gear Tooth: Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks
Stresses were analyzed and measured for a gearStresses were analyzed and measured for a gear– Stresses decreased by 15%.– Deflection increase of 2.3% has no major effect on the
kinematics and functionality of gear.
Hole was introduced close to the corner of Hole was introduced close to the corner of maximum tensile stress at an angle of 29 degrees maximum tensile stress at an angle of 29 degrees from vertical. from vertical.
Photoelasticity results verified the analysisPhotoelasticity results verified the analysis
Designing parts for performance and mass Designing parts for performance and mass productionproduction– Mass reduction– Stress reduction– Cost reduction– Performance improvement– Machine design components or systems
Missile designMissile design– Optimization theory and application– Academic vs. industrial design optimization
Machine Design Optimization:Machine Design Optimization:Optimization of a MissileOptimization of a Missile
Machine Design Optimization: BasicsMachine Design Optimization: Basics Optimization VocabularyOptimization Vocabulary
Minimize F(X) Objective functions.t. gj (X) 0 Inequality
hk(X) = 0 Equality constraints
Xilower Xi Xi
upper Side
X Design variable vector
Multidisciplinary Design OptimizationMultidisciplinary Design Optimization– Computational expense – Organizational complexity
DescriptionDescription
11 Aerodynamic configurationAerodynamic configuration
mass propertiesmass properties
CG locationCG location
22 Aerodynamic coefficientsAerodynamic coefficients
33 Thrust verses timeThrust verses time
Specific ImpulseSpecific Impulse
Nozzle dimensionsNozzle dimensions
44 DimensionsDimensions
Volume, MassVolume, Mass
ConfigurationConfiguration
55 Nozzle exit diameterNozzle exit diameter
power on/offpower on/off
66 Geometric dimensionsGeometric dimensions
Propulsion dimensions, Propulsion dimensions, Material, WeightMaterial, Weight
77 Single or dual pulse Single or dual pulse configurationconfiguration
Propellant weightPropellant weight 7
6
4
Propulsion Analysis
Cost Analysis
Aerodynamic Analysis
Trajectory Analysis
1
2
3
5
Geometry Engine
Machine Design Optimization: BasicsMachine Design Optimization: Basics Optimization AlgorithmsOptimization Algorithms
– Gradient-based Algorithms– Genetic Algorithms
MDO FormulationsMDO Formulations– Discipline communication
ApproximationsApproximations– Artificial Neural Networks– Design of Experiment – Response Surface Approximations– Taylor Series Approximations
Machine Design Optimization: AlgorithmsMachine Design Optimization: Algorithms Gradient BasedGradient Based
– Sensitivities (gradients) from finite difference
– Local minimum
– Basic conceptXq = Xq-1 + *Sq
X: design vector
q: iterate
S: Search direction
: distance to move in direction S
– Unconstrained problem Gradient is zero Positive definite Hessian Matrix
– Constrained problem Khun-Tucker necessary condition
X* is feasiblejgj (X*) = 0 j = 1,m j 0F(X*) + jgj(X*) + khk(X*) = 0j 0
x
)()(
xuxxu
x
u
Machine Design Optimization: Machine Design Optimization: Academic vs. Academic vs. IndustrialIndustrial Problems Problems
Design GoalDesign Goal – Maximize range
Key design parametersKey design parameters– Mid body diameter– Mid body length– Nose length– Case length– Web fraction (difference of the
outer and inner radii to the inner radius)
– Expansion ratio (the ratio of the exit area to the throat area of the nozzle)
– Gamma (angle of the velocity vector)
ConstraintsConstraints– Weight
– Center of gravity
– Total missile length
– Cost
– Nose finess ratio
– Minimum Mach number
Machine Design Optimization: Machine Design Optimization: Missile Concluding RemarksMissile Concluding Remarks
Algorithms, Formulations, Approximations and Algorithms, Formulations, Approximations and programming language were combined to remove programming language were combined to remove obstacles.obstacles.
Optimization scheme was integrated and tested on a Optimization scheme was integrated and tested on a highly coupled air-to-air sparrow-like missilehighly coupled air-to-air sparrow-like missile– Efficient and robust optimization scheme:
Reduced computational time up to 44% Allows for modifications to the optimization statement Covers regions in the design space for which a response
cannot be computed
Scheme can be applied to other large-scaled Scheme can be applied to other large-scaled engineering problemsengineering problems
Knee Implant Example cKnee Implant Example c
Knee joint is a hinge joint Knee joint is a hinge joint Stress analysisStress analysis Stress concentrationsStress concentrations Wear of the implantWear of the implant Manufacturing Manufacturing
– Rapid Prototyping– Investment Casting
Tibia
Fibula
Femur
Patella
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Need for CustomizationNeed for Customization
>0.5 million orthopedic implant surgeries conducted each >0.5 million orthopedic implant surgeries conducted each year in the USyear in the US– Number increasing
Increasing life span Higher activity level
Problems associated with implants are proportionally Problems associated with implants are proportionally increasingincreasing– Use of standard implants leads to removal of valuable bone
material– Revisions are primarily due to loosening of implants
Poor fit – only a few types and sizes are available Stress concentrations affect bone remodeling
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Current DesignCurrent Design
Cancellous Bone
Cortical Bone
Tibial PlateauStem
Sharp edges
Medial cross section of femoral component
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Current DesignCurrent Design
PProblems with current design:roblems with current design:– Only 7 different sizes
– Removal of bone
– Doesn’t fit perfectly
– Not used for younger patients
– Sharp edges
– Stress concentrations – Bone remodeling
– Loosens with time
Tibial component
Femoral component
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant Designing the customized implantDesigning the customized implant
– Implant should resemble the geometry of the original knee
– Redistribution of stresses results in variation of bone mineral density
– Reduce possible relative motion of tibial plate implant to the tibial bone
Data acquisitionData acquisition– Computed Tomography data
Modeling of bone and implantModeling of bone and implant
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant CT-data acquisitionCT-data acquisition
– Scanning device completes a 360o revolution– Slices are 1 to 5 mm apart – Result: Matrix with gray scaled pixels based on
tissue density
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant Data conversion using Mimics from Data conversion using Mimics from
MaterialiseMaterialiseDensity threshold
Investigation of each scanned slice
Scanning the objectScanning the object
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant
Slice distance
Resulting Image SetResulting Image Set
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant
Select the desired regionSelect the desired region
… … and Growand Grow
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant
Data conversion using Mimics from MaterialiseData conversion using Mimics from Materialise
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Design of Customized ImplantDesign of Customized Implant
Femoral Component Tibial Component
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Initial Stress Analysis of ImplantInitial Stress Analysis of Implant Finite Element AnalysisFinite Element Analysis
– 0o, 45o, 90o gait angle– Load 3,5,10 times the body weight
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Initial Stress Analysis of ImplantInitial Stress Analysis of Implant
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Initial Stress Analysis of ImplantInitial Stress Analysis of Implant
45o gait
90o gait
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Initial Stress Analysis of ImplantInitial Stress Analysis of Implant
Implant Design (Implant Design (σ in MPa)σ in MPa) Type of Type of ImplantImplant
X*body weightX*body weight
(85kg * 9.81m/s(85kg * 9.81m/s2)2)
0° gait angle0° gait angle 45° gait angle45° gait angle 90° gait angle90° gait angle
OldOld 3 3 186186 150150 154154
NewNew 33 158158 115115 130130
OldOld 55 311311 250250 257257
NewNew 55 263263 191191 217217
OldOld 1010 622622 500500 514514
NewNew 1010 525525 383383 435435
Knee Implant Example:Knee Implant Example:ManufacturingManufacturing
Rapid PrototypingRapid Prototyping–Laser cures one layer at a time–Thickness: 0.006 inch
Investment Casting Investment Casting
CAD model to stereolithography CAD model to stereolithography modelmodel. –Eliminates costly low-production-run wax pattern tooling.
Knee Implant Example:Knee Implant Example:Manufacturing – Investment CastingManufacturing – Investment Casting
Knee Implant Example:Knee Implant Example:Manufacturing – Investment CastingManufacturing – Investment Casting
Knee Implant Example:Knee Implant Example:Manufacturing – Investment CastingManufacturing – Investment Casting
Knee Implant Example: Knee Implant Example: Concluding RemarksConcluding Remarks
An implant design has been studied and redesigned to An implant design has been studied and redesigned to increase life of the implantincrease life of the implant
Initial stress analysis have been performed.Initial stress analysis have been performed.– Results are favorable for the new implant
Manufacturing of implantManufacturing of implant– Rapid prototype model– Investment casting model
Future work:Future work:– Improve finite element model and analysis– Parameterize and optimize
Machine design:Machine design:– Hinge joint, stress analysis, stress concentration, wear,
manufacturing
Overall ConclusionOverall Conclusion Machine Design Overview Machine Design Overview Research Areas and ApplicationsResearch Areas and Applications
– Gear Tooth FEM/FEA and Optimization– Machine Design Optimization– Customized Knee Implant: Design, Stress
Analysis and Manufacturing Research Mission at UNFResearch Mission at UNF