what is problem based learning - united states military ... · pdf filemy summation of the...

21
PROBLEM BASED LEARNING Chad C. Schools This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, a 2-year faculty professional development program conducted by the Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 2007. This work was conducted in collaboration with the United States Military Academy (USMA) Master Teacher Program, offered through the USMA Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE), West Point, New York. The support of Dr. Mark Evans, CTE Director and Dr. Kimberlee Bonura, CTE Assistant Director, is gratefully acknowledged. Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered teaching method that uses real-world problems as the motivation of a self-directed learning process. There are many variations that can be classified as PBL such as guided design, case-method, games/simulations (McKeachie, 2006), and project-based learning. PBL can also be classified under more general teaching methods such as active-learning, constructivism, and student-centered teaching. One of the key elements that sets PBL apart from other methods is that the problem comes before instruction on the knowledge needed for the problem. Typically, the student applies new knowledge covered through instruction to solve a problem. In PBL students use the problem to direct them to research and learn the new knowledge needed (Erickson, Peters & Strommer, 2006). This unique sequence is the foundation of PBL and the main source of the positive and negative attributes of this teaching method. McKeachie (2006) writes of the abundant research conducted on PBL, My summation of the results is that, compared with traditional methods of teaching, problem-based learning may sometimes result in less acquisition of knowledge but typically shows little, if any, decrement. However, retention, application, and motivational outcomes are generally superior to those in traditional methods of instruction (p. 202). Overall, PBL is currently a popular teaching method that all teachers should be aware of as professional educators. The impetus for PBL is the real-world requirement to work in a group to solve ill- defined, complex problems. Current educational research has shown that typical lecture methods and end-of-chapter questions do not require students to reach higher cognitive leve ls. Many students faced with similar questions but in different context fail to make the connection of the questions’ similar underlying principles. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956) a typical end-of-chapter question may require the first three cognitive levels; knowledge, comprehension and application. To achieve higher cognitive levels of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation requires a different approach to learning. PBL is one teaching method that attempts to achieve higher cognitive levels and to develop life-long problem solving skills. “Cognitive theory provides good support for the idea that knowledge learned and used in a realistic, problem-solving context is

Upload: truongnga

Post on 30-Mar-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

PROBLEM BASED LEARNING Chad C. Schools

This paper was completed and submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master Teacher Program, a 2-year

faculty professional development program conducted by the Center for Teaching Excellence, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 2007.

This work was conducted in collaboration with the United States Military Academy (USMA) Master Teacher Program, offered through the USMA Center for Teaching Excellence (CTE), West Point, New York. The support of Dr. Mark Evans, CTE Director and Dr. Kimberlee Bonura, CTE Assistant Director, is gratefully acknowledged. Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered teaching method that uses real-world problems as the motivation of a self-directed learning process. There are many variations that can be classified as PBL such as guided design, case-method, games/simulations (McKeachie, 2006), and project-based learning. PBL can also be classified under more general teaching methods such as active-learning, constructivism, and student-centered teaching. One of the key elements that sets PBL apart from other methods is that the problem comes before instruction on the knowledge needed for the problem. Typically, the student applies new knowledge covered through instruction to solve a problem. In PBL students use the problem to direct them to research and learn the new knowledge needed (Erickson, Peters & Strommer, 2006). This unique sequence is the foundation of PBL and the main source of the positive and negative attributes of this teaching method. McKeachie (2006) writes of the abundant research conducted on PBL,

My summation of the results is that, compared with traditional methods of teaching, problem-based learning may sometimes result in less acquisition of knowledge but typically shows little, if any, decrement. However, retention, application, and motivational outcomes are generally superior to those in traditional methods of instruction (p. 202).

Overall, PBL is currently a popular teaching method that all teachers should be aware of as professional educators. The impetus for PBL is the real-world requirement to work in a group to solve ill-defined, complex problems. Current educational research has shown that typical lecture methods and end-of-chapter questions do not require students to reach higher cognitive levels. Many students faced with similar questions but in different context fail to make the connection of the questions’ similar underlying principles. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (1956) a typical end-of-chapter question may require the first three cognitive levels; knowledge, comprehension and application. To achieve higher cognitive levels of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation requires a different approach to learning. PBL is one teaching method that attempts to achieve higher cognitive levels and to develop life-long problem solving skills. “Cognitive theory provides good support for the idea that knowledge learned and used in a realistic, problem-solving context is

more likely to be remembered and used appropriately when needed later” (McKeachie, p 202). History PBL was formally introduced in the 1960s at McMaster University in Canada for a medical course, but many agree that the underlying concepts have been in use much longer. Karen Goodnough (2006) makes connections to J. Dewey’s 1944 work that “emphasized the connections amongst doing, thinking and learning.” Original applications of PBL focused on medical and other professional studies and its large expansion in the 1970s and 1980s brought PBL to other disciplines including the sciences and more recently to the humanities. PBL, in its many different forms, is now used at all grade levels in many diverse educational environments. Practice Variations PBL has been used to describe a wide range of methods and techniques and careful consideration of educational objectives is required when integrating PBL into a curriculum. Over twenty years ago Barrows (1986) proposed a taxonomy of PBL methods and determined three major variables that distinguish different methods; “the design and format of the problem,” “the degree to which learning is teacher-directed or student-directed,” and “the sequence in which the problems are offered and information is acquired” (p. 482). To achieve the highest educational gain the problem is presented with minimal background information, the students acquire the information needed to solve the problem independently, and they revisit the problem when new information is gained until an acceptable solution is achieved. The wide spectrum of variations possible causes the educational outcomes also to be varied. Beneficial Attributes Two primary advantages of PBL are student motivation and problem solving skills. Student motivation is a critical component of PBL. Carefully crafted problems that are linked to the students’ personal interests, to their community, or to current real-world issues can improve student motivation to ask questions and learn. Encouraging this inquisitiveness can develop life-long problem-solving skills that are highly sought after in most industries. More complex problems require a methodical approach that includes identifying known information, identifying needed information, and developing a detailed research plan for the group. This process develops the skills needed to effectively work in a group and present verbal and written information. Controversial Aspects The controversial aspects of PBL come from the effects of the many variations in executing a PBL curriculum. Some aspects that are commonly discussed are the complexity of the problems, the role of the facilitator, and the assessment of students. Key to the PBL process is the problem statement. The topic of the problem and the complexity of the problem will significantly affect the students’ motivation and the achievable cognitive levels. Although databases of problem statements in many disciplines continue to grow, finding the correct balance of topical interest and

complexity for a specific course with specific learning objectives can be difficult. Problem choices will significantly alter the educational outcomes of the course. Also challenging for many educators is the role as facilitator, not teacher, in the PBL process. The role of the facilitator varies throughout the PBL process and throughout a given course. The skills of a facilitator vary and again significantly affect the students’ motivation and the achievable cognitive levels. In larger courses that require multiple facilitators this issue is compounded. The facilitator must balance the amount of directing they do to the importance of content coverage in the course. Allowing student to develop their own learning requirements can result in key topics not covered. Directly related to content knowledge is student assessment. The main focus of PBL is problem-solving skills in a group environment, which does not lend itself to traditional individual exams focused on content knowledge. Innovative and clearly published assessment techniques are required to maintain a positive educational environment.

References Barrel, J. (2003) Developing More Curious Minds. Alexandria, VA: Association for

Supervision and Curriculum Development. Barrows, H.S. (1986) A Taxonomy of Problem Based Learning Methods. Medical

Education, 20, 481-486. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of

education goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green.

Clouston, T. J. (2005) “Facilitating Tutorials in Problem-based learning: Students’ Perspectives.” In P. Hartley, A. Woods and M. Pill (eds.) Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education: New Approaches for Improving Student Learning. New York: Routledge.

Delisle, R. (1997) How To Use Problem-Based Learning In The Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Erickson, B.L., Peters, C. B., and Strommer, D. W. (2006) Teaching First-Year College Students: Revised and Expanded Edition of Teaching College Freshman. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Felder, R. M. (1995) We Never Said it Would be Easy. Chemical Engineering Education, 29(1), 32-33.

Glen, S. and Wilkie, K. (Eds.) (2000) Problem-Based Learning In Nursing, A New Model For A New Context? New York, NY: Palgrave Publishers.

Goodnough, K. (2006) Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge through self-study: an exploration of problem-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, 301-318.

McKeachie, W. J. (2006) McKeachie’s Teaching Tips, Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Twelfth edition. Boston, MA: Houghlin Mifflin.

Queen’s University. (2004). Problem-based learning handbook. Retrieved April 2008, from http://meds.queensu.ca/pbl/assets/pblhndbk2006.pdf

Raine, D., and Symons, S. (Eds.) (2005) PossiBiLiites, a Practical Guide to Problem-based Learning in Physics and Astronomy. Hull, United Kingdom: The Higher Education Academy Physical Sciences Centre.

Torp, L. and Sage, S. (2002) Problems As Possibilities, Problem-Based Learning For K-16 Education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Uden, L. and Beaumont, C. (2006) Technology And Problem-Based Learning. Hershey: PA: Information Science Publishing.

Woods, D. R. (1996) Problem-based Learning: helping your students gain the most from PBL, Third Edition. Hamilton, Ontario: Donald R. Woods.

Annotated Bibliography Barrel, J. (2003) Developing More Curious Minds. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Barrel uses modern examples of situations, including the attacks on 9/11, that may have been avoided if questions were asked, as the motivation for educators to develop inquisitiveness in students. Chapter 8, Inquiry- and Problem Based Learning starts with the same inquisitive approach and answers the question why should we use problem based learning. He then discusses techniques to implement problem based-learning through examples. Most other resources focus on science-based courses but Barrel includes a high school social studies class studying Africa demonstrating the flexibility of problem-based learning. Barrows, H.S. (1986) A Taxonomy of Problem Based Learning Methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486. Barrows has published many articles on the use of problem-based learning in medical education and is widely referenced. This article would be very useful for an educator establishing a problem-based learning course as he or she weighs the objectives of their course against different problem-based learning techniques. The article establishes four educational objectives of problem-based learning and six categories of problem-based learning methods. Each method is then methodically evaluated in each objective. Although Barrows focus is medical education the educational objectives and methods can be easily modified for any field of study. Clouston, T. J. (2005) “Facilitating Tutorials in Problem-based learning: Students’ Perspectives.” In P. Hartley, A. Woods and M. Pill (eds.) Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education: New Approaches for Improving Student Learning. New York: Routledge. The implementation of problem-based learning requires the teacher to take the role as a facilitator. The role the facilitator plays can significantly change the problem-based learning experience for the students involved. This chapter, one of a collection of accounts covering a wide range of higher education topics, provides background information on problem-based learning then focuses on students’ perceptions of facilitation styles and skills. Based on students’ feedback, Clouston establishes three aspects to describe facilitation style and three aspects to describe facilitation skills. Delisle, R. (1997) How To Use Problem-Based Learning In The Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. This text takes problem-based learning, originally developed for medical students, and simplifies it for K-12 students. Although the sample problems are developed for primary and secondary education levels, the simplistic approach and frequent checklists makes it a useful resource for someone new to problem-based learning. Delisle develops a simple six-step process that provides the necessary structure for teachers and students to effectively implement problem-based learning.

Erickson, B.L., Peters, C. B., and Strommer, D. W. (2006) Teaching First-Year College Students: Revised and Expanded Edition of Teaching College Freshman. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. An overall teaching resource, this text provides a short summary of problem-based learning and includes a detailed example of problem-based learning used in a writing course. Finally, a summary of current problem-based learning assessments is presented. Felder, R. M. (1995) We Never Said it Would be Easy. Chemical Engineering Education, 29(1), 32-33. A short article written by one of the leaders in active learning, Felder stresses that the transition to an active learning curriculum (problem-based learning) will not be easy, but it is worth the effort. He makes an interesting comparison of what students first exposed to a problem-based learning environment experience and the experiences associated with trauma and grief. He then presents strategies to help students and educators make the transition. Goodnough, K. (2006) Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge through self-study: an exploration of problem-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, 301-318. In this article Goodnough analyzes the effects of executing a problem-based learning curriculum on her development as a teacher and specifically her pedagogical content knowledge. Although the focus is the self-study of an educator, many useful insights into the use of problem-based learning are presented as she discusses her experience executing the pre-service science education course. These include concerns about the appropriate support of students, equity among groups working on different problems, the amount of the course that was problem-based, appropriate assessment, group dynamics, and students’ learning of required content. McKeachie, W. J. (2006) McKeachie’s Teaching Tips, Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Twelfth edition. Boston, MA: Houghlin Mifflin. McKeachie’s text is a well known reference that covers a wide range of higher education topics. Several chapters cover different aspects and techniques of active learning including one on problem-based learning. This chapter highlights three specific variations of problem-based learning; guided design, case studies, and simulations. McKeachie provides a short description of each variation then provides a useful list of supplemental reading for each variation. Raine, D., and Symons, S. (Eds.) (2005) PossiBiLiites, a Practical Guide to Problem-based Learning in Physics and Astronomy. Hull, United Kingdom: The Higher Education Academy Physical Sciences Centre. A very useful resource, it provides many details on the different models of problem-based learning, what constitutes a good problem, the role of the facilitator, and assessment methods. Included are many case studies that present different teaching scenarios as motivation to implement problem-based learning, develop plans to implement, predicts outcomes and then performs a cost-benefit analysis for each case. Finally, ten contributors detail their experiences in implementing problem-based learning.

Uden, L. and Beaumont, C. (2006) Technology And Problem-Based Learning. Hershey: PA: Information Science Publishing. This 362-page text is highly researched and is the most comprehensive resource on problem-based learning found. The details of problem-based learning are examined using major educational theories; clearly developing the strengths and weakness of problem-based learning. The key components of executing a course using problem-based learning is covered in detail including the role of the tutors and the tutorial process, the development of appropriate problems, and individual and group assessment. The final chapters provide useful information learned from direct experience executing problem-based learning courses. Woods, D. R. (1996) Problem-based Learning: helping your students gain the most from PBL, Third Edition. Hamilton, Ontario: Donald R. Woods. Woods has developed three separate text covering problem-based learning. This text is the primary source for teachers as they consider problem-based learning and begin implementation in their courses. Unique is the details presented to implement problem-based learning in incremental steps. This process allows an educator to gradually make the transition from a traditional course to a problem-based learning course, a common hurdle. Also unique is the presentation of the complex options in problem-based learning in tabular form. Woods’ other text are cross-referenced throughout the text. Problem-based Learning: resources to gain the most from PBL is another teacher resource that provides more specific details on the implementation of problem-based learning. Problem-based Learning: How to gain the most from PBL is a student resource designed to introduce students to problem-based learning.

WEB Resources The Problem-Based Learning Center at Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama.

http://www.samford.edu/ctls/problem_based_learning.html The Problem-Based Learning Network at Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy in

Aurora, IL. http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/pbln/tutorials/intro/ Problem-Based Learning at the University of Delaware. http://www.udel.edu/pbl/ Problem Based Learning and the McMaster Problem Solving Program at McMaster

University in Hamilton, Ontario. http://chemeng.mcmaster.ca/innov1.htm The PBLI is a group of teachers and researchers involved in PBL and active in faculty

educational development. http://www.pbli.org/pbl/pbl.htm Exploring the Environment™ (ETE) Teacher Pages, The NASA Classroom of the

Future™ at Wheeling Jesuit University. http://www.cotf.edu/ete/teacher/teacherout.html

The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning (IJPBL). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/

Learning Initiatives website of the Penn State College of Information Sciences and Technology. http://pbl.ist.psu.edu/

The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey’s Center for Teaching Excellence. http://cte.umdnj.edu/

Other Resources Abbot, J. (1996). A New Synthesis for Effective Learning. Wingspread Journal, 17,2: 10-

12. Abercrombie, M.L.J. (1970). Aims and Techniques of Small Group Teaching.London:

Society for Research in Higher Education. Albanese MA and Mitchell S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on

its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1): 52-81. Alkove, L., and B. McCarthy. (1992). Plain Talk: Recognizing Positivism and

Constructivism in Practice. Action in Teacher Education, 14, 2: 9-15. Alper, L., D. Findel, S. Fraser, and D. Resek. (1996). Problem-Based Mathematics Not

Just For the College-Bound. Educational Leadership,53, 8: 18-21. Anderson, J. E., Ridley, T. (l977). Cool School: An Alternative Secondary School

Experience. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Studies in Education. Aronowitsch, E., Crafoerd, and Floberg, U. (1995). Introducing Problem Based Learning

in Psychotherapeutic Training--Focus on Regression and Integration. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, Vol 9: 31-40

Aspy, D.N., Aspy, C.B., and Quinby, P.M. (April 1993). What Doctors Can Teach Teachers About Problem-Based Learning. Educational Leadership, 50, 7: 22-24.

Baron, J. (1981). Reflective thinking as a goal of education. Intelligence, 5, 291-309. Barrows, H. S. and Mitchell, D.L. (1975). An innovative course in undergraduate

neuroscience: Experiment in problem-based learning with "problem boxes." British Journal of Medical Education, 9(4): 223-30.

Barrows, H. S., Tamblyn, R. (l976). An Evaluation of Problem-based learning in Small Groups Using a Simulated Patient. Journal of Medical Education, 51, 52-54.

Barrows, H. S., Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Barrows, H.S. (1985). How to Design a Problem-based Curriculum for Pre-clinical Years. New York: Springer Publishing Co.

Barrows, H.S. (2000). Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education, Springfield, IL: SIU School of Medicine.

Barrows, H.S. (l988). The Tutorial Process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.

Barrows, H.S. (l994). Practice-Based Learning: Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education, Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.

Barrows, H.S. (l996). What Your Tutor May Never Tell You, Springfield, IL: SIU School of Medicine.

Barrows, H.S. and Bennett, K. (1982). Experimental studies on the diagnostic (problem-solving) skill of the neurologist, their implications for neurological training. Archives of Neurology, 26:273-277.

Barrows, H.S. and Feltovich, P.J. (1987). The clinical reasoning process. Medical Education, 21(2): 86-91.

Barrows, H.S. and Mitchell D.L. (1975). An innovative course in undergraduate neuroscience: Experiment in problem-based learning with "problem boxes." British Journal of Medical Education, 9(4): 223-30.

Barrows, H.S. and Pickell, G.C. (1991). Developing Clinical Problem-solving Skills: A Guide to More Effective Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, London, Norton Medical Books, W. W. Norton & Co.

Barrows, H.S. and Tamblyn, R.M. (1976). Guide to the development of skills in problem-based learning and clinical (diagnostic) reasoning. Project for Learning Resources Design (PLRD) Monograph #1. McMaster University, Faculty of Medicine, Hamilton.

Barrows, H.S. and Tamblyn, R.M. (1977) The portable patient problem pack: A problem-based learning unit. Journal of Medical Education, 52(12): 1002-4.

Barrows, H.S. and Tamblyn, R.M. (1979). Problem-based learning in health sciences education. Contract No. 1 LM-6-4721, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, National Medical Audiovisual Center.

Barrows, H.S., (1998). The essentials of problem-based learning. Journal of Dental Education. 62:9, 630-633.

Barrows, H.S., Myers, A.C., Williams, R.G., and Moticka, E.J. (1986). Large group Problem-Based Learning: A possible solution for the 2 sigma problem. Medical Teacher, 8(4), 325-31.

Barrows, H.S., Norman, G.R., Neufeld, V.R. and Feightner, J.W. (1982). The clinical reasoning of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clinical and Investigative Medicine-Medicine Clinique et Experimentals, 5(1): 49-55.

Barrows, H.S., Tamblyn, R.M. and Jenkins, M. (1976). Preparing faculty for innovative educational roles. Journal of Medical Education, 51: 592-4.

Barrows, H.S., Tamblyn, R.M., Gliva, G., Baxter, D., Murray, J. and Dunne, P. (1979). Design and evaluation of problem based learning units in neurology. Transactions, American Neurological Association, 104: 236-8.

Benware, C.A. and Dice, E. (l984). Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set. American Education Research Journal, 21 (4), 755-765.

Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1992). Cognition and Curriculum. Handbook of Research on Curriculum. Jackson, P.W. (ed.). Old Tappan, N.J.: Macmillan.

Berkson L. (1993). Problem-based Learning: Have the Expectations Been Met? Academic Medicine, 68: S79-88 (October supplement).

Birch, S. (1986). Towards a model for problem-based learning. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 73-82.

Bloom, B.S. (l984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

Blosser, P.E. (1988). Teaching Problem Solving--Secondary School Science. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH.

Blosser, P.E. (l988). Teaching Problem Solving--Secondary School Science. EMI-ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3,4), 369-398.

Bodner, G. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education. 63, 10: 873-877.

Boix-Mansilla, V. and H. Gardner. (1997). Of Kinds of Disciplines and Kinds of Understanding. Phi Delta Kappan 78, 5: 381-386.

Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning. London, Kogan Page and New York, St Martin’s Press.

Bransford, J.D. (1993). Who Ya Gonna Call? Thoughts About Teaching Problem Solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.

Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., Vye, N.J. and Sherwood, R.D. (1989). New Approaches to Instruction: Because Wisdom Can't Be Told. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Vosiadou, S. and Ortony, A. (Eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bransford, J.D., Vye, N.J., Adams, L.T. and Perfetto, G.A. (1989). Learning Skills and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Foundations For a Psychology of Education. Glaser, R. and Lesgold, A. (Eds), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 199-249.

Bridges, E.M. and Hallenger, P. (l992). Problem-based Learning for Educational Administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

Bridges, E.M. and Hallinger,P. (1995). Implementing Problem-Based Learning in Leadership Development. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

Brooks, J.G. and M.G. Brooks. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Broudy, H. (1982). What Knowledge Is of Most Worth? Educational Leadership, 39, 8: 574-578.

Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for Thought: A science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Carter, M. (1988). Problem Solving Reconsidered: A Pluralistic Theory of Problems. College English 50(5), 551-564.

Casey, M. and Tucker, E. (1994). Problem-Centered Classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan. 10, 94, 139-143.

Chamberlain, T.C. (1965). The method of multiple working hypotheses. (Reprinted from Science, 15:92, 1890). Science. 148(5), 754-9.

Colby, K. (1986). Problem-based learning of social sciences and humanities. Journal Of Medical Education, 61(5), 413-415.

Collins, A. et al. (1991). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making things visible. American Educator, 15(3), 38-46.

Collins, A., Brown, J.S. and Newman S. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Resnick, L.B. (Ed.), Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conway, J. and Williams, A. (Eds.). (1999). Themes and Variations in PBL. Australia: Australian Problem Based Learning Network.

Conway, J., Melville, D. and Williams, A. (1999). PBL: A Way Forward. Research and Development in Problem-Based Learning, Vol. 5. Australia: Australian Problem Based Learning Network.

Coreiro, P. (1990). Problem-based thematic instruction. Language Arts, 67(1), 26-34. Cornbleth, C. (1998). Curriculum in and out of Context. Journal of Curriculum and

Supervision, 3, 2: 85-96. Costa, A.L. and Garmston, R.J. (1994). Cognitive Coaching: A Foundation for

Renaissance Schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc. Costa, A.L. and Kallick, B. (2000). Discovering & Exploring: Habits of Mind.

Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Costa, A.L. and Liebmann, R.M. (1997). The Process-Centered School: Sustaining a

Renaissance Community. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Corwin Press, Inc. Coulson, R., Osborne, C. (1984) Insuring curricular content in a student-directed

problem-based learning program. Schmidt, H. and De Volder, M. (Eds.). Tutorials in problem-based learning. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 225–9.

Daly-Engel, T. and Duncan, K. (2006) Using Forensic Science Problems as Teaching Tools. The Science Teacher, Vol. 73, Issue 8, 38-43.

DeHart Hurd, P. (2000). Transforming Middle School Science Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Delisle, R. (1997). How to Use Problem-Based Learning in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Dewey, J. (1943). The School and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Distlehorst, L.H. and Robbs, R.S. (1998). A comparison of problem-based learning and

standard curriculum students: Three years of retrospective data. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 10(3), 131-137.

Distlehorst, L.H., Barrows H.S. (l982). A new tool for problem-based self-directed learning. Journal of Medical Education, 57(6), 486-8.

Dods, R. (1996). A Problem-Based Learning Design for Teaching Biochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73: 225-228.

Doll, W. (1993). Curriculum Possibilities in a 'Post'-Future. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8, 4: 277-292.

Dolmans, D. (1994). How Students Learn in a Problem-Based Curriculum. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Datawyse, Universitaire Pers.

Dolmans, D.H. et al. (1991). Course improvement based on course content data: An explorative study conducted in problem based curriculum. ERIC Document ED334220.

Dolmans, D.H. et al. (l992). Do Students Learn What Their Teachers Intend They Learn? Guiding Processes in Problem-based Learning. ERIC Document ED343955.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Gejselaers, W. H., Schmidt, H.G., and van der Meer, S.B. (1993). Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 68(3), 207-213.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Schmidt, H.G., and Gijselaers, W.H. (1993). Course content coverage as a measure of instructional quality. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 16, 448-471.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Schmidt, H.G., and Gijselaers, W.H. (1994). The relationship between student-generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22, 251-267.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Schmidt, H.G., and Gijselaers, W.H. (1994). Use of student-generated learning issues to evaluate problems in a problem-based curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6, 199-202.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Schmidt, H.G., and Gijselaers, W.H. (1994). What drives the student in problem-based learning? Medical Education, 28, 372-380.

Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P., et al. (1994). A rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem-based curriculum: Validity and reliability. Medical Education, 28, 550-558.

Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J.D. and Pellegrino, J.W. (Eds.). (1999). How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Drake, S.M. (1993). Planning Integrated Curriculum: The Call to Adventure. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E. (Eds.) (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing

Duffy, T. (l994). Strategic Teaching Framework: An Instructional Model for Learning Complex Interactive Skills. Instruction of Development State of the Art. Paradigms. C., Dells, A. Romeszowski(Ed). Educational Technology Publications.

Duffy, T.M. and Savery, J.R. (February 1995). Constructivism: A Theory of Learning with Implications for Instruction. Session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.

Eisenstaedt, R. (1990). Problem-based learning: Cognitive retention and cohort traits of randomly selected participants and decliners. Academic Medicine, 65(9), 511-512.

Elstein, A.S., Shulman, L.S., Sprafka, S.S. (1978). Medical Problem-solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA and London.

Farmer, A. (1985). A new approach to physics teaching. Physics Teacher, 23(6), 338-343.

Feely, J. (1994). Take Home Science: Independent Activities for Science and Technology. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Feldman, E., Jenkins, M., Barrows, H., and Tamblyn, R. (1980). An approach to faculty education, Journal of Medical Education, Vol 55.

Feltovich, P., Johnson, P.E., Moller, J.H. and Swanson D.B. (1984). The role and development of medical knowledge in diagnostic expertise. Readings in medical artificial intelligence: The first decade. Clancey, W.J. and Shortliffe, E. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Feltovich, P.J. and Barrows, H.S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. Tutorials in problem-based learning: New directions in training for the health professions.Schmidt, H.G. and DeVolder, M.L. (Eds.). Assen/Maastricht, The Netherlands:Van Gorcum.

Feltovich, P.J., (1982/1983). Expertise: Reorganizing and refining knowledge for use. PERN ,4(3), 5-9.

Finch, P.M. (1999). The effect of problem-based learning on the academic performance of students studying podiatric medicine in Ontario. Medical Education, 33; 411-17.

Finkel, D. (2000). Teaching With Your Mouth Shut. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Finkle, S., Briggs, R.,Hinton, L.,Thompson, J. and Dods R. (1994). The Summer Challenge Landfill Problems. Aurora, Ill. : Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy.

Firestien, R., and Treffinger. (l989). Guidelines for Effective Facilitation of Creative Problem Solving. Gifted Child Today, 12(5), 44-47.

Fraser, J. (1998). Teacher to Teacher: A Guidebook for Effective Mentoring. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Frederiksen, N. (1986). Toward a broader conception of human intelligence. American Psychologist ,41(4), 445-52.

Frederiksen, N. (l984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363-407.

Gale, J. and Marsden P. (1983). Medical Diagnosis: from student to clinician. Oxford University Press, London.

Gallagher, S., Rosenthal, H. and Stepien, W. (l992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem-solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-200.

Gallagher, S., Sher, B.T., Stepien, W.J. and Workman, D. (1995). Implementing Problem-Based Learning in Science Classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136-46.

Geerligs, T. et al. (l993). Test Format and Test-directed Study Behavior in Problem-Based Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Geerlings, T. (1995). Students' thoughts during problem-based small-group discussion. Instructional Science, 22, 269-278.

Gibbons, D. (1995). PBL Diffusion: Factors Influencing PBL Knowledge, Teaching Values, and Level of Use. Unpublished report available from the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Aurora, Ill.

Gick, M.L. and Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.

Gijselaers, W.H. (1995). Perspectives on Problem-Based Leaming. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration: The Case of Problem-Based Learning. Gijselaers, W.H., Tempelaar, D.T., Keizer, P.K., Blommaert, J.M., Bernard, E.M. and Kasper, H. (Eds.), Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer.

Gilhooly, K.J. (l990). Cognitive Psychology and Medical Diagnosis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, (4), 261-272.

Gist, G.L. (1992). Problem-Based Learning: A New Tool for Environmental Health Education. Journal of Environmental Health, 54(5), 51-70.

Glaser, R. (1982). Education and thinking. EL Thorndike Address. American Psychological Association.

Glaser, R. (1991). The Maturing of the Relationship Between the Science of Learning and Cognition and Educational Practice. Learning and Instruction, 1, 129-144.

Glasgow, Neal A. (1997). New Curriculum for New Times: A Guide to Student-Centered, Problem-based Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Glen, S. and Wilkie, K. (Eds.). (2000). Problem-Based Learning In Nursing, A New Model For A New Context? New York, NY: Palgrave Publishers.

Glickman, C. (1991). Pretending Not to Know What We Know. Educational Leadership, 48 (8), 4-10.

Godden, D.R., Baddeley, A.D. (1975). Context-Dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 325-31.

Goldsmith, L.T., Mark, J. and Kantrov, I. (1998). Choosing a Standards-Based Mathematics Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Problem-Solving Situations. Vol. 1. Corvallis, OR: Grapevine Publications, Inc.

Harel, J. and Papert, S. (l990). Software Design as a Learning Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, (l). 1-32.

Harris, K.R., and Graham, S. (1996). Memo to Constructivists: Skills Count, Too. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 26-29.

Hay, J.A. and Schmuck, M.F. (l993). Problem-based Learning: Development and Analysis of a Tutor Evaluation Form for use in Small-Group Problem-based Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Hendley, V. (1996). Let Problems Drive the Learning. AESS Prism, 30-36. Hmelo, C. (1995). Problem-Based Learning: Development of Knowledge and Reasoning

Strategies. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Moore, J.D. and Lehman, J.F. (Eds). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 403-408.

Hmelo, C.E. (1998). Cognitive consequences of PBL for the early development of medical expertise. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 10, 92-100.

Hmelo, C.E. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. Journal of the Learning Science, 7, 173-208.

Hmelo, C.E. and Ferrari, M. (1997). The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher-order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 401-422.

Hmelo, C.E., Gotterer, G.S. and Bransford, J.D. (1994). The Cognitive Effects of Problem- Based Learning: A Preliminary Study. Paper presented at the American

Educational Research Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA. ERIC Doc #ED371026.

Hmelo, C.E., Gotterer, G.S. and Bransford, J.D. (1997). Theory-Driven Approach to Assessing the Cognitive Effects of PBL. Instructional Science, 25, 387-408.

Illinois Problem-Based Learning Network. (1996). "Don't Let the Smoke Get in Your Eyes." The Summer Sleuths Program. Aurora, Ill. : Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy.

Illinois State Board of Education's Center for Scientific Literacy. (1994). "Scientific Literacy Program: Request for Proposals." Springfield, Ill. : Illinois State Board of Education.

Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1979). Conflict in the Classroom: Controversy and Learning. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 51-70.

Joyce, B.R. and Calhoun, E.F. (1996). Creative Learning Experiences: The Role of Instructional Theory and Research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kagan, D.M. (1988). Teaching as clinical problem solving: A critical examination of the analogy and its implications. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 482-505.

Kagan, S. (1989). Cooperative Learning Resources for Teachers. 8th ed. Laguna Niguel, CA: Resources for Teachers.

Kamin, C.S. and Hawkins, J. (1997). A Protocol to Assess the Curricular Validity of Cases for PBL, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 9(3) 215-220.

Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and Memorizing: Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kaufman, D.M., Eng, M., and Mann, K.V. (1996). Comparing Students' Attitudes in Problem-based and Conventional Curricula, Academic Medicine, 71(10), 1096-1099.

Keller, F.S. (l968). Good-Bye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, l(l), 79-89. Kinsley, C.W. and McPherson, K. (Eds.). (1995). Enriching the Curriculum Through

Service Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kitchener, K. (l983). Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic cognition: A three Level Model of Cognitive processing. Human Development, 26(4), 222-232.

Knoll, J.W. (1993). An Introduction to Reiterative PBL. Issues and Inquiry in College Learning and Teaching,Spr/Smr, A156, 19-36.

Knowles, M.S. (l975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Association Press.

Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., and Conlee, M. (1997). Analyzing the emergence of a learning issue in a Problem-Based Learning meeting. Medical Education Online, 2(1) [electronic serial: http://www.utmb.edu/meo/res00003.pdf, also to appear in Evensen, D. and Hmelo, C. (Eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.].

Koschmann, T., Kelson, A.C., Feltovich, P.J. and Barrows, H.S. (1996). Computer-Supported Problem-Based Learning: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Koschmann, T. (Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Krynock, K.B. and Robb, L. (1996). Is Problem-Based Learning a Problem for Your Curriculum? Illinois School Research and Development Journal, 33(1), 21-24.

Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D.P., Cooper, J.E., Lambert, M.D., Gardner, M.E. and Slack, P.J.F. (1995). The Constructivist Leader. New York: Teachers College Press.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Lederman, L. (1994). Give a Small Child a Hammer and Soon Everything Needs Hammering. Simulation and Gaming, 25(2): 215-221.

Levine, H.G. and Forman, P.B. (1973). A study of retention of knowledge of neurosciences information. Journal of Medical Education, 48(9), 867-9.

Lipman, M. (1988). Critical Thinking--What Can It Be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. Loucks-Horsley, S., Henson, P.W., Love, N. and Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing

Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Magill, M.K. et al. (l988). A computer-assisted system for analysis of interaction in problem-based learning groups. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 2(3), 318-332.

Major, C.H. and Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping teaching and learning: The transformation of faculty pedagogical content knowledge. Higher Education, 51, 619-647.

Major, C.H. and Savin-Baden, M. (2004). Foundations Of Problem-Based Learning. Maidenhead, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Margetson, D. (1991). Is there a future for problem-based education? Higher Education Review, 23(2), 33-47.

Martenson D. (1993). Is problem-based learning beneficial? A research overview. Educacão Médica, 4, 2-9.

Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I-Outcome and Process. Br. J. educ. Psychology, 46, 4-11.

Maudsley, G. (1999). Do we all mean the same thing by "Problem-based Learning"? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Academic Medicine, 74(2), 178-85.

McGaghie, W.C. (1991). Professional Competence Evaluation. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5-11.

McGrew, M.C., Skipper B., Palley, T. and Kaufmann, A. (1999). Student and faculty perceptions of problem-based learning on a faculty medicine clerkship. Family Medicine, 31(3): 171-6.

McLaughlin, M.W. and Oberman, I. (Ed.). (1996). Teacher Learning: New Policies, New Practices. New York: Teachers College Press.

Medawar, P.B. (l969). Introduction and Intuition in Scientific Thought. London: Metheun.

Mennin, S.P., Kalishman, S., Friedman, M., Pathak, D. and Snyder, J. (1996). A Survey of Graduates in Practice from the University of New Mexico's Conventional and Community-oriented, Problem-based Tracks. Academic Medicine, 71(10), 1079-1089.

Minstrell, J. and van Zee, E.H. (2000). Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Mitchell, R. (1994). The Development of the Cognitive Behavior Survey to Assess Medical Student Learning. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 6(3), 161-167.

Moore, G.T., Block, S.D., Style, C.B. and Mitchell, R. (1994). The influence of the new pathway curriculum on Harvard Medical Students. Academic Medicine, 69, 983-989.

Moss, G.D., McMillan, D. (1980). A strategy for developing problem-solving skills in large undergraduate classes. Studies in Higher Education, 980, 5(2), l6l-71.

Moust, J.H.C. and Schmidt, H.G. (1994). Effects of staff and student tutors on student achievement. Higher Education, 28, 471-482.

Moust, J.H.C., and Schmidt, H.G. (1994). Facilitating small-group learning: A comparison of student and staff tutors behavior. Instructional Science, 22, 285-299.

Musial, D. (1996). Designing Assessments in a Problem-Based Learning Context. The Problem Log, 1(2), 4-5.

Myers, A. (1990). Cognitive science insights for professions' education. Journal of Optometric Education, 15(4), 105-110.

Nagel, N.G. (1996). Learning Through Real-World Problem Solving: The Power of Integrative Teacher. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.

Nash, P.P. et al. (l99l). A student centered, Problem-based surgery clerkship. Academic Medicine, 66(7), 415-17.

Needham, D.R. and Begg, I.M. (1991). Problem-Oriented Training Promotes Spontaneous Analogical Transfer: Memory-Oriented Training Promotes Memory for Training. Memory and Cognition, 19, 543-557.

Newble, D.I. and Clarke, R.M. (1986). The Approaches to Learning of Students in a Traditional and in an Innovative Problem-based Medical School. Medical Education, 20, 267-273.

Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Newmann, F. (1990). Higher-Order Thinking in Social Studies: A Rationale for the Assessment of Classroom Thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41-56.

Nickerson, R. and Zodhiates, P. (l988). Technology in Education: Looking Toward 2020. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D.N. and Smith, E.E. (1985). The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

Nisbett, R.E., Fong, G.T., Lehman, D.R. and Cheng, P.W. (1987). Teaching reasoning. Science, 238(4827), 626-31.

Norman, G.R. (l988). Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Medical Education, 22, 279-286.

Norman, G.R., and Schmidt, H.G. (1992). The Psychological Basis of Problem-Based Learning; A Review of the Evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-65.

Norris, S. P. (l989). Can We Test Validly for Critical Thinking. Educational Researcher l8,(9), 21-26.

Norris, S.P. (1985). Synthesis of Research of Critical Thinking. Educational Leadership, 42(5), 40-45.

Okuda, S.M., Runco, M.A. and Berger, D.E. (1991). Creativity and the Finding and Solving of Real-World Problems. Journal of Psychoeducation Assessment, 9, 45-53.

Palincsar, A.S., (1989). Less Charted waters. Educational Researcher, 8, 5-12. Pate, P.E., Homestead, E.R. and McGinnis, K.L. (1997). Making Integrated Curriculum

Work: Teachers, Students, and the Quest for Coherent Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

Patel, V. et al. (l99l). Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving. Academic Medicine, 66(7), 380-389.

Perfetto, G.A., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J. (1983). Constraints on access to a problem solving context. Memory and Cognition. 11, 24-31.

Perkins, D.B. (1993). An Apple for Education: Teaching and Learning for Understanding. Presentation at the EdPress Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

Perkins, D.B. (1993). Teaching for Understanding. American Educator, 17(3), 8. Perkins, D.B. and Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational

Researcher, 18(l), 16-25. Perkins, D.B. et al. (l990). Teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of

Structural Learning, 10(4), 285-303. Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Translated by T. Brown and

K.J. Thampy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1975).

Prawat, R.S. (l993). The value of ideas: Problems versus possibilities in learning. Educational Researcher, August-September, 5-16.

Qin, Z., Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1995). Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143.

Ramsey, P.G., Carline, J.D., et al. (1991). Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. Journal of American Medical Association, 266(8), 1103-7.

Reed, S.K. (1988). Cognition: Theory and Applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Regan-Smith, M.G., Obenshain, S.S., Seitz, H., Richards, B., Woodward, C., and Small, P.A. (1994). Rote Learning in Medical School. Journal of American Medical Association, 272(17), 1380-81.

Regnier, D.P., Welsh, J.L., Quarton. (l994). The Problem-based Learning Curriculum At Southern Illinois University School of Medicine: A Student Perspective. Annals of Community-Oriented Education, 7, 259-266.

Reigeluth, C.M. (1994). The Imperative for Systemic Change. Reigeluth, C.M. and Garfinkle, R.J. (Eds.). Systemic Change in Education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Richards, B.F., Ober, P., Cariaga-Lo, L., Camp, M.G., et al. (1996). Ratings of Students' Performances in a Third-year Internal Medicine Clerkship: A Comparison between Problem-based and Lecture-based Curricula. Academic Medicine, 71(2), 187-189.

Roberts, D.A. and Ostman, L. (Eds.). (1998). Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

Romey, W. (1975). Transdisciplinary, problem-centered studies. School Science and Mathematics, 76(l), 30-38.

Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Rowntree, D. (1977). Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Sage, S.M. and Torp, L.T. (1997). What Does It Take to Become a Teacher of Problem-Based Learning? Journal of Staff Development. 18(4), 32-36.

Savoie, J.M. and Hughes, A.S. (1994). Problem-Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Educational Technology. 35(5), 31-38.

Schmidt, H.G. (1994). Problem-based learning: An introduction. Instructional Science, 22, 247-250.

Schmidt, H.G. (1994). Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: Does lack of structure cause students to seek tutor guidance? Academic Medicine, 69-656-662.

Schmidt, H.G. (l983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11-16.

Schmidt, H.G. et al. (l993). Peer Versus Staff Tutoring in Problem-based Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Schmidt, H.G., and Moust, J.H.C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708-714.

Schmidt, H.G., Dolmans, D.H.J.M., et al. (1995). Theory-guided design of a rating scale for course evaluation in Problem-Based curricula. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 7, 82-91.

Schmidt, H.G., Machiels-Bongaerts, et al. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: A comparison between a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Academic Medicine, 71, 658-664.

Schmidt, H.G., Norman, G. and Boshuizen. (l990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise. Academic Medicine, 65(10), 611-621.

Schmidt, Henk G. (1993). Foundations of Problem-Based Learning: Some Explanatory Notes. Medical Education, 27, 422-432.

Schmoker, M. (1996). Results: The Key to Continuous School Improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Shahabudin, S.H. (l987). Content coverage in problem-based learning, Medical Education, 21, 310-313.

Shin, J.H., Haynew, R.B. and Johnston, M.E. (1993). Effect of problem-based, self-directed undergraduate education on life-long learning. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 148(6).

Simmons, R. (1994). The Horse Before the Cart: Assessing for Understanding. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 22-23.

Sinnot, J. (l988). Everyday Problem Solving. New York: Praeger. Solomon, G. and Perkins, D. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking Mechanisms of

a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113-142. Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J. and Anderson, D.K. (1988). Cognitive

flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Sprenger, M. (1999). Learning and Memory: The Brain in Action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Stepien, W. and Gallagher, S. (l993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25-28.

Stepien, W., Gallagher, S. and Workman, D. (l993). Problem-based learning for traditional and Interdisciplinary classrooms. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, l6(d4), 338-357.

Stepien, W.J., Senn, P.R. and Stepien, W.C. (2000). The Internet and Problem-Based Learning: Developing Solutions Through the Web. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.

Sternberg, R.J., Wagner, R.K., Williams, W.M. and Horvath, J.A. (1995). Testing Common Sense. American Psychologist, 50(11), 912-927.

Sternburg, R. (l982). Teaching scientific thinking to gifted children. Roeper Review, 4(4), 4-6.

Stinson, J.E. (l990). Integrated Contextual Learning: Situated Learning in the Business Profession. ERIC Document ED319330.

Swink, D. (1993). Role Playing Your Way to Learning. Training and Development, 47(5), 91-97.

Sylwester, R. (1995). A Celebration of Neurons: An Educator's Guide to the Human Brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tamblyn, R.M., Barrows, H.S. and Gliva, G. (1980). An initial evaluation of learning units to facilitate problem-solving and self-directed study (portable patient problem pack). Medical Education, 14, 394-400.

Torp, L. and Sage, S. (2002). Problems As Possibilities, Problem-Based Learning For K-16 Education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Torp, L.T. (1996). Planning a Problem-Based Learning Adventure. Naperville, IL: Possibilities, Inc.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). What Work Requires of Schools: A SCANS Report for America 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Vernon, D. and Blake, R. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 7, 550-563.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching. Synthese, 80, 121-140.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Radical Constructivism: Teaching vs. Training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

Wales, C.E. (l979). Does how you teach make a difference? Engineering Education, February, 394-398.

Washington, E.T., Tysinger, J.W., Snell, L.M. and Palmer, L.R. (1998). Implementing problem-based learning in a family medicine clerkship. Family Medicine, 30(10), 720-6.

West, S.A. (1992). Problem-Based Learning-A Viable Addition for Secondary School Science. School Science Review, 73(265), 47-55.

Wilkerson, L. (1995). Skills for the Problem-Based Tutor: Student and Faculty Perspectives. Instructional Science, 22, 303-315.

Wilkerson, L. (l993). Tutors, Strategies for Promoting Problem Solving in a Problem-based Tutorial. Paper presented at the annual American Education Research Association meeting.

Wilkerson, L. and Feletti, G. (l989). Problem-based learning: One approach to increasing Student participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Spring(37), 51-60.

Wilkerson, L. and Gijselaers, W.H. (Eds.). (1996). Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Willems, J. (l981). Problem-based (group) teaching: A cognitive science approach to using available knowledge. Instructional Science, 10(l), 5-21.

Williams, S.M. (l992). Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(4), 367-427.

Wolf, C., McIlvain, L. and Stockburger, M. (1992). Getting Our Students to Think Through Simulations. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 219-220.

Woods, D.R. (1994). Problem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL. Hamiltion, Ontario, Canada: Donald R. Woods Publisher.

Woods, D.R. (l985). What about problem-based learning? Journal of College Science Teaching, 15(l), 62-64.