what must be done to ehance capacity for health systems research?
TRANSCRIPT
Sara Bennett, Ligia Paina, Christine Kim, Irene Agyepong, Somsak Chunharas, Di McIntyre,
Stefan Nachuk
AimsMap different facets of HSR capacity
at individual, organizational and environmental/network levels
Identify strategies to promote capacity development for HSR and those that appear effective
MethodsDefining HSR: health services, health systems
research, operational or intervention researchMapping – review of existing international
databasesSystematic review of capacity development
initiatives for HSR, including papersReported implementation of a project or initiativeHIC or LMICWhether or not evaluated
Capturing information on: nature of interventions, context, implementation issues, evaluation design, evaluation findings
Reflection on authors’ experiences
The GapThe situation in LMICs The situation in USPopulation – 5.5 billion
250-300 health systems research organizations in LMICs
6-7,500 health systems researchers
Source: Bennett et al 2010
Population – 310 million
709 research organizations that housed PIs for HSR projects
13,000 health services researchers
Source: Pittman & Holve 2009
Region # orgs offering HS or policy MScs
# orgs offering HS or policy PhDs or DrPHs
Types of course offerings
Africa 10 2 Health services planning and management, health economics, health systems and policy
Americas 20 7 Politics and planning, public policy and health, politics of health
Asia 9 5 Health economics, Health policy and systems, Health financing
Overview of review findings73 papers – 67% from HICs (especially US,
UK, Canada)Most initiatives had multiple components Initiatives targeted most at individual level,
then organizational then environmental/network
Largely targeted university based researchers (43% HICs, 54% LMICs)
But service providers, especially GPs and nurses also a key audience in HICs.
Interventions identified in systematic review
HICs
Mentoring 31%Research seminars 27%Fellowships 24%Research grants 24%Partnerships 20%Short courses 10%Networking 18%Post grad training 10%Research infrastructure 10%
LMICs
Short courses 58%Networking 38%Research grants 29%Post grad training 29%Partnerships 25%Basic training 17%Mentoring 17%Research infrastructure 8%Strategic planning 4%Research seminar 4%
Implementation factors (# studies)Facilitators Constraints
Enthusiasm and motivation of participants (5)
Institutional support from parent organization (4)
Flexibility in program design (4)
Strong leadership (3)Builds on existing
partnerships (2)Participatory approach (2)Being part of broader
program (2)
Lack of time – participants, staff and mentors (13)
Insufficient funding (sustainability) (8)
High coordination costs (7)Timelines too short (6)Lack of support from host
organization (4)Lack of confidence of
participants (4)Lack of institutional and
managerial support (3)Language barriers (3)
Key FindingsInterventions successful at the individual level
had limited overall effects due to organizational or environmental level constraints
Few interventions targeted constraints at multiple levels
Maintaining flexibility in capacity development programs is key
Mentoring is an effective strategyShort course training alone is necessary but not
sufficient for developing research capacityVery few interventions evaluated – weak
evaluation designs, most by internal evaluators, no cost data
Evaluation of interventionsHICs LMICs
Total # articles 49 24% articles with evaluation
47% 37.5%
No. articles with independent evaluation
2 2
# articles with costs
10 7
Over-arching Capacity development interventions should
be:Multi-faceted, responding to capacity needs at
different levelsTailored to the context where they are being
implemented
As we scale up investment in capacity development, we must evaluate the effects of CD initiatives
Environment/network levelExternal funders should funnel a larger
share of their funding to local stakeholders
Strengthen networks between different types of HSR actors within countries
Support capacity development among health workers and health service organizations
Organizational levelEngage with organisational leaders to
advocate for HSR
Intensify efforts to secure predictable and sustainable core funding, including endowments
Ensure better funding for research networks and cross-country partnerships
Individual LevelDevelop open access training modules in
HSR that support training needs of different types of researchers coming to the field
Provide incentives and innovative schemes for senior researchers to stay in-country