what people really think about native advertising [research]

14
Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream © 2015 Headstream www.headstream.com Photo credit: Stinging Eyes What people really think about native advertising What people really think about native advertising

Upload: headstream

Post on 20-Feb-2017

3.605 views

Category:

Marketing


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream© 2015 Headstream www.headstream.com Photo credit: Stinging Eyes

What people really think about native advertisingWhat people really think about native advertising

Page 2: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Contents

1. Executive summary

2. Introduction and methodology

3. The results● Transparency trumps cunning placements● Younger audiences demand authenticity● People are open to brand sponsored content● Appetite for brand sponsored content highest among 18-34s● Quality and value maketh the ad

4. Conclusion

5. About Headstream

Page 3: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Executive summary

Headstream commissioned independent research into the distribution of brand sponsored stories via native advertising to help to determine key

considerations relating to this type of approach.

The results suggest that transparency is paramount and that any sponsored content should be easily identifiable as such. While audiences can be

put off by the knowledge that a story was created to support a brand message, if the content is perceived to be valuable and relevant, these

reservations can potentially be allayed.

● 71% of UK adults believe that it is important for brand-created stories to be clearly distinguishable from editorial stories when they

appear on online news sites

● Transparency in terms of brand sponsored content is especially important to younger audiences, with over half (54%) of 18-24s

considering it to be very important, if not vital

● 53% of UK adults are willing or very willing to read / view a story that has been sponsored by a brand

● 38% of UK adults would be put off by the knowledge that a story was created to promote a brand, while 41% said it would depend how

good / entertaining the story was

Page 4: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Introduction and methodology

The digital revolution of the past twenty years – and the associated

content revolution – has thrown the need for relevant, valuable

content into sharp focus for brands. As important as the quality of

the content though is its visibility.

While good content and stories will always generate some level of

organic conversation and engagement among existing brand

communities via owned and borrowed media, in order to achieve

real scale, brands often need to invest in paid solutions.

The rise of mobile, increased use of AdBlock style software and the

major media owners and publishers continued efforts to nurture

effective revenue streams via digital have all helped bring native

advertising to the fore.

With such appetite among the marketing community and all manner of

solutions on offer, we wanted to get a simple customer view of native

advertising to understand how effective it can be in reaching and

engaging consumers.

As part of our broader brand storytelling research, we asked UK

consumers a handful of questions about their experience and opinion

of native advertising and brand-sponsored content. So for example,

how important is it that brand-created stories are clearly

differentiated from editorial content when appearing on news sites?

Headstream’s survey was conducted independently among 2,000 UK

adults in April 2015. The sample was selected from our partner

research agency’s panels, which are balanced across regional age, and

gender demographic factors.

Page 5: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

71%believe that it’s important that brand-created stories are clearly differentiated

from editorial stories

Page 6: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

How important is it to you that brand-created stories are clearly differentiated from editorial stories when they appear on an online news site?

The majority of respondents (71%) believe that it is important to some extent for brand-created stories to be clearly distinguishable from editorial

stories. This suggests brands should be mindful of placement and delivery options when selecting native advertising partners and solutions.

Transparency trumps cunning placements

Page 7: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

How important is it to you that brand-created stories are clearly differentiated from editorial stories when they appear on an online news site?

This transparency is especially important to younger audiences, with over half (54%) of 18-24s considering it to be very important, if not vital. Just

17% of 18-34s indicated that they placed little or no importance on clear differentiation. It’s crucial therefore to select native placements relevant

and valuable to both your brand and audience.

Younger audiences demand authenticity

Page 8: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

People are open to brand sponsored content How willing are you to read/view a story that’s been sponsored by a brand?

So if people know a story is sponsored by a brand, will they still read it? Our research suggests they will - just 17% of respondents indicated that

they categorically refuse or are unwilling to look at brand sponsored stories. The willing are not without reservation though, with a further 30%

expressing a predilection for non-sponsored stories. So while competition for audience attention appears healthy, so does the opportunity for

brands.

Page 9: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Appetite for brand sponsored content highest among 18-34sHow willing are you to read/view a story that’s been sponsored by a brand?

Younger audiences are more open to engaging with brand sponsored content, with approximately two-thirds of 18-34 year olds indicating that

they are willing or very willing, compared to just one-third of people in the 55+ age group. This suggests that younger audiences potentially want

more from brands, beyond straightforward product and service messages.

Page 10: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Would you be put off if you found out a story was created to promote a brand message?

Over one-third (38%) of respondents indicated that they would be put off by the knowledge that a story was created to promote a brand. This

negative effect can however be offset by the perceived quality and / or entertainment value of the content. This is most pronounced in the 18-34

age group where almost half of respondents could be influenced, although it’s still a consideration for over one-third of the 35-44 and 55+ age

groups. Simply put, relevant and valuable content are important factors in helping to land your brand message via native advertising.

Quality and value maketh the ad

Page 11: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

65%of 18-34 year olds

would willingly engage with brand-sponsored

stories

Page 12: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

Conclusion

So consumers in the UK are open to content distributed via native advertising, but handle with care.

Audiences understand that their favourite sites and feeds incorporate ads into the experience, but there is a level of expectation that these will be

clearly distinguishable from editorial content. While it appears a minority will always decry the presence of brand sponsored content, the majority

are either willing or open to being convinced of its value.

As with all story led advertising there is a barrier to overcome in terms of people being put off by the thought that the underlying purpose of the

content is to promote a brand message. This research does however suggest that the perceived level of quality and entertainment value can

certainly influence the audience’s view of branded content distributed via native advertising.

Page 13: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

About Headstream

We’re the content marketing agency for ambitious brands.

We believe that in today’s connected world a content-led approach to marketing is the only way brands can remain

visible and relevant to their customers.

It all started in 2006 when we launched as one of the UK’s first social media marketing companies. We built a

talented team and helped those early adopters understand and take advantage of social media.

We contributed to the debate on social media performance by creating the Social Brands 100 research, which

measured and ranked the best brand performance across social media channels.

As the years have rolled on the agency has grown into the successful, and modest, marketing agency you see today

by evolving our capabilities to ensure our clients get what they original came to us for – results for the modern

marketer.

Through Headstream, ambitious brands such as GSK, BBC, National Trust, Fat Face, Schuh and P&O Cruises have

increased their visibility and relevancy with content.

Page 14: What people really think about native advertising [Research]

Native Advertising © 2015 Headstream

023 8082 8575 headstream.com @headstream +headstream