what to do about peer review-1

Upload: jeremy-horne

Post on 08-Aug-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    1/59

    What to do about peerreview

    by

    Jeremy Horne, Ph.D.The Inventors Assistance League

    [email protected]

    http://www.inventions.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.inventions.org/
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    2/59

    Presented to:

    The 16th World Multi-Conference on

    Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics:WMSCI 2012

    17-20 July 2012 Orlando, Florida, USA

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    3/59

    Whom are we talking about?

    Editors

    Reviewers

    Writers Readers

    Each has an ethical duty to monitor the integrity ofwhat is being presented.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    4/59

    Carl Zimmer

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    5/59

    In the fall of 2010, Dr. Ferric C. Fang made an unsettling

    discovery. Dr. Fang, who is editor in chief of the journalInfection and Immunity, found that one of his authors haddoctored several papers.

    It was a new experience for him. Prior to that time, he said inan interview, Infection and Immunity had only retracted nine

    articles over a 40-year period.The journal wound up retracting six of the papers from theauthor, Naoki Mori of the University of the Ryukyus in Japan.And it soon became clear that Infection and Immunity washardly the only victim of Dr. Moris misconduct. Since then,

    other scientific journals have retracted two dozen of hispapers, according to the watchdog blog Retraction Watch.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-re

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html?_r=1&src=dayphttp://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html?_r=1&src=dayp
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    6/59

    What we think is peer review?

    Ethical environment reviewers, reviewed, and audience

    Standards of qualityJudgment of qualityQuality reviewersContribution to the body of knowledge

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    7/59

    What peer review often is

    Editorial bias

    Destructive competition

    Fraud, data manipulation, etc.

    No uniform standards

    Unqualified reviewers

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    8/59

    Richard Horton, editor of the Britishmedical journal The Lancet -

    The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer reviewwas any more than a crude means of discovering theacceptabilitynot the validityof a new finding. Editorsand scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer

    review. We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our mostobjective truth teller. But we know that the system of peerreview is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easilyfixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish,

    and frequently wrong [Horton, Richard (2000). "Geneticallymodified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up".MJA 172 (4): 1489. PMID 10772580.].

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    9/59

    "Only 8% agreed that 'Peer Review workswell as it is'," according to a survey made tothe members of the Scientific Research

    Society. " [Chubin, D. R. and Hackett E. J.,1990, Peerless Science, Peer Review andU.S. Science Policy; New York, State

    University of New York Press, p. 192.]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    10/59

    `the practice of peer review is based

    on faith in its effects, rather than onfacts'.

    [Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects ofeditorial peer review: a systematic review.

    JAMA2002;287:2784 -6 -http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/content/99/4/178.full#ref-2 ]

    http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/content/99/4/178.full#ref-2http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/content/99/4/178.full#ref-2
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    11/59

    Peer review is not only aboutacademics.

    Faulty software Poor documentation

    Defective products counterbalanced against

    the claims Business scandals Bankster bailout, Wall

    Street debacle

    Politics Sales

    The whole legal system

    Advertising

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    12/59

    90% of home computers areMicrosoft Windows-based

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    13/59

    Interesting source note toillustrate lack of accountability -

    Even today, Microsoft has more than 90percent market share of desktops, comparedwith 6 percent for Apple.

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57455261-94/wh

    No sources given for this ubiquitous figure.

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57455261-94/why-microsoft-built-its-own-tablet-think-apple-and-xbox/http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57455261-94/why-microsoft-built-its-own-tablet-think-apple-and-xbox/
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    14/59

    Other areas -

    GSK [Glaxo-Smith-Klein] targeted the antidepressantPaxil to patients under age 18 when it was approved foradults only, and it pushed the drug Wellbutrin for uses itwas not approved for, including weight loss and

    treatment of sexual dysfunction, according to aninvestigation led by the US Department of Justice.

    The company went to extreme lengths to promote thedrugs, including distributing a misleading medical journal

    article, providing doctors with expensive resort vacations,European hunting trips, high-paid speaking tours andeven tickets to a Madonna concert.

    [http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/07/201272195753767494.html]

    http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/07/201272195753767494.htmlhttp://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/07/201272195753767494.html
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    15/59

    Sources of problems

    Dishonesty

    Lack of knowledge

    Ideology

    Wishful thinking

    Peer pressure

    Sloppy methods Ego

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    16/59

    Sources of dishonesty

    Willful altering of truth due to:

    Genetics

    Ego

    Peer pressure

    Loss of sense of virtue

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    17/59

    ConsiderHow organisms manage to venture their egos to

    meet peer pressure and competition -

    It's natural!

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    18/59

    They are not what they appear to be.

    In animals, plumage, camouflage, and a cat ruffling itsfur are forms of puffery, or, to us a form of the lie saying something to the outside world when the truth issomething different. We seem to be stuck with this basicconstitution.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    19/59

    The Emperor's New Clothes

    [Illustration by , Andersen's first illustrator]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    20/59

    We ask, who are the wizards, orexperts?

    What is our knowledge base?

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    21/59

    The Black Lie 2007-2012 by Zindy -http://zindy.deviantart.com/art/The-Black-Lie-58075950

    The White Lie

    http://zindy.deviantart.com/art/The-Black-Lie-58075950http://zindy.deviantart.com/art/The-Black-Lie-58075950
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    22/59

    Who are we?

    Society of lies lies to ourselves, our spouses,the products we sell the whole ecosystem is

    based on lies advertising

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    23/59

    EGO

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    24/59

    Lack and questionable integrityof knowledge

    This extends all across the spectrum fromgeneral public to the scientists.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    25/59

    June 1, 2012

    In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human

    Origins

    by Frank Newport

    PRINCETON, NJ -- Forty-six percent of Americans believein the creationist view that God created humans in theirpresent form at one time within the last 10,000 years. Theprevalence of this creationist view of the origin ofhumans is essentially unchanged from 30 years ago,

    when Gallup first asked the question.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspxhttp://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    26/59

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    27/59

    In Academically Adrift, sociologists Richard Arum andJosipa Roksa report that after two years of college,45% of American students havent learned anything,and after four years, 36% havent. Most students, theydiscovered, define college as a social, not an academicor intellectual, experience; half the students in their

    study said they hadnt taken a single course in theprevious semester that required more than 20 pages ofwriting, and a third said they hadnt taken a courserequiring more than 40 pages of reading. A Marist pollreleased on 4 July 2011 (appropriately enough) showedthat 69% of Americans in the under-30 age group areunaware that the U.S. declared its independence in1776.http://morrisberman.blogspot.mx/

    We come to the borderlands of

    http://morrisberman.blogspot.mx/http://morrisberman.blogspot.mx/
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    28/59

    We come to the borderlands ofscience when good science

    goes badNorm Shealy

    Richard C. HoaglandStanley McDanielWilliam Shockley

    Linus PaulingRhine Institute

    Journal of Frontier ScienceJournal of Scientific Discovery

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    29/59

    Then, there are

    Bernard Haisch - Solar & Astrophysics Laboratory at LockheedMartin in Palo Alto, California, deputy director - Center forExtreme Ultraviolet Astrophysics Laboratory at the University ofCalifornia, Berkeley, visiting scientist - Max Planck Institute forExtraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany and at theUniversity of Utrecht in the Netherlands. More than 100 papers -

    Nature, Science, Physical Review, Astrophysical Journal, andAnnalen der Physik. Website - UFO Skeptic, which promotes theinvestigation of the UFO phenomenon by professionalscientists.

    Brian Josephson 1973 Nobel Laureate Josephson Junction,

    parapsychological phenomena may be real, Eastern mysticismmay have relevance to scientific understanding Criticism byseveral fellow physicists including David Deutsch, a quantumphysicist at Oxford University who stated: "It [telepathyexplained by quantum processes] is utter rubbish. -

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephson

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephsonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Josephson
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    30/59

    Stanley McDaniel

    Instructor in Philosophy, Brooklyn College, CUNY, 1964-66 Teacher of Philosophy at Sonoma State University, 1966-

    1992:(Pragmatism, Kant, Logic, Eastern Thought, Philosophy ofPsychology,Aesthetics of Music, Philosophy of Esoteric Systems, etc.)

    Chair, Department of Philosophy, Sonoma State University

    Member, American Philosophical Association. Member, Society for the Advancement of American

    Philosophy. Member, American Association of Philosophy Teachers. Vice-President of the Board of Directors,

    The Foundation for Critical Thinking;Rohnert Park,California.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    31/59

    The McDaniel ReportInstead of carrying out legitimate scientific enquiry , NASA has regularly sent false andmisleading statements regarding the landforms to members of congress and theirconstituents. [http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/esp_marte_41.htm]

    8 April 2001

    1976 Viking 1photographof the Face on Mars

    Pareidolia (play /pr do li/ parr-i-DOH-lee-) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant.Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in themoon or the Moon rabbit, and hearing hidden messages on records played in reverse.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/esp_marte_41.htmhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/esp_marte_41.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidoliahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidoliahttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/esp_marte_41.htm
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    32/59

    Norman Shealy, M.D., Ph.D

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    33/59

    Gigatens

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    34/59

    Gigatens circuit diagram

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    35/59

    Signs of crossing the boundary Faulty methods

    Will to believe

    Abandonment of dispassionate search for truth

    Straying into area outside of expertise

    Not qualifying conclusions Psychotic break

    Commercializing your findings

    Release of results first through popular press Generalizing from a few legitimate examples

    Religiosity and ideology control research direction

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    36/59

    If this weren't bad enough

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    37/59

    [ h t t p : / / w w w . c h r i s t o p h e r m c g i l l . c o m / 2 0 1 0 / 0 5 / 2 4 / t h e - t o p - n i n e - c v - l i e s - t o - l o o k - o u t - f o r - s a n -a n t o n i o / ]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    38/59

    A small sample

    The dean of admissions at MIT was forced to resign in 2007 forfalsifying herresume.[ ]The vice dean of the Graduate School of Education at the

    University of Pennsylvania resigned Thursday, one day after hewas placed on administrative leave pending an investigationinto his false claim to have a doctoral degree.

    [http://www.academicjobstoday.com/news-1658-Penn_education_graduate_school_vice_dean_Doug_Lynch_resigns_over_questions_about_his_doctoral_credentials.html 27April 2012 ]

    On Monday morning, President Pamela Gann of ClaremontMcKenna College announced via email to members of the CMCcommunity that a senior administrator at the Office ofAdmission had been reporting inaccurate SAT statistics since2005. - January 30, 2012 at 12:54 pm[http://cmcforum.com/news/01302012-cmc-office-of-admission-falsely-reported-sat-scores ]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    39/59

    Plagiarism

    data are sorely lacking on the true extent of plagiarism, whether its prevalence isgrowing substantially and what differences might exist between disciplines. [Plagiarismpinioned Nature 466,159160 (08 July 2010) doi:10.1038/466159b Published online 07July 2010 - ]

    The University of Virginia recently stripped Fred D. Smith of his doctorate in education.Last year, iThenticate was utilized by a reporter from to break a story on Smith, the ex-

    Pocantico Hills superintendent who plagiarized much of his UVA dissertation.[http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-checker-blog/bid/52964/Dissertation-Plagiarism ]

    Boston University, where King received his in , conducted an investigation that found heplagiarized major portions of his doctoral thesis from various other authors who wroteabout the topic. Boston University decided not to revoke his doctorate, saying thatalthough King acted improperly, his dissertation still "makes an intelligent contribution to

    scholarship." However, a letter is now attached to King's dissertation in the universitylibrary, noting that numerous passages were included without the appropriate quotationsand citations of sources.

    [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._authorship_issues ]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    40/59

    ...more

    Study by Don McCade, a University of Rutgers

    Professornearly 40% of college students have plagiarizedpapers by the cut-and-paste function on their computers to lifttext off the internet (Heyboer). At the University of Toronto,more than 200 cases of plagiarism are reported each year, andthe university's administration notes that this is probably onlya fraction of those who actually commit academic fraud . Anarticle in London's Daily Mailclaims that in the UnitedKingdom as many as 30 to 35 percent of student assignmentsare cribbed at least in part, from essay banks and fellowstudents' work (Grant). An August 2002 report by LarissaDubecki observes that of 1000 university students surveyed

    from four Australian universities, 41% admitted cheating ontests, while 86% of males and 77% of females admitted tocommitting some form of plagiarism ( ). -

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    41/59

    Inflating test scores

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    42/59

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    43/59

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    44/59

    E x c e r p t s -

    T h e y a r e a m o n g a t l e a s t 2 2 0 C a n a d i a n s w i t h b o g u s a c a d e m i c c r e d e n t i a l s

    u n c o v e r e d i n a r e c e n t p r o b e . W o r l d w i d e , f a k e d e g r e e s a r e a b i l l i o n d o l l a r

    i n d u s t r y , e v e n t h r e a t e n i n g g o v e r n m e n t s e c u r i t y , i n v e s t i g a t o r s s a y .

    L a s t w e e k , a n u n d e r c o v e r S t a r i n v e s t i g a t i o n e x p o s e d P e n g S u n , a Y o r k U n i v e r s i t y

    g r a d w h o f o r g e s u n i v e r s i t y d e g r e e s f r o m r e a l C a n a d i a n u n i v e r s i t i e s f o r $ 4 , 0 0 0 .

    S u n ' s c l i e n t l i s t w a s n o t a v a i l a b l e , b u t t h e S t a r o b t a i n e d a l i s t o f C a n a d i a n s w h o

    b o u g h t f a k e d e g r e e s f r o m a n A m e r i c a n d i p l o m a m i l l b u s t e d t h r e e y e a r s a g o b y t h e

    U . S . S e c r e t S e r v i c e a n d H o m e l a n d S e c u r i t y .

    T h e g a n g r a k e d i n m o r e t h a n $ 7 m i l l i o n i n s a l e s t o 1 3 1 c o u n t r i e s . I t s o l d

    e v e r y t h i n g f r o m h i g h s c h o o l d i p l o m a s t o P h D s a n d m e d i c a l d e g r e e s . D o z e n s o f

    U . S . g o v e r n m e n t e m p l o y e e s a r e o n t h e l i s t , i n c l u d i n g a W h i t e H o u s e s t a f f m e m b e r , N a t i o n a l S e c u r i t y A g e n c y e m p l o y e e s , a s e n i o r S t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f f i c i a l ,

    a n d a D e p a r t m e n t o f J u s t i c e e m p l o y e e .

    T e n s o f t h o u s a n d s o f p e o p l e a r e w a l k i n g a r o u n d w i t h " t i c k i n g t i m e b o m b s i n t h e i r

    r e s u m e s , " s a y s A l l e n E z e l l , a f o r m e r F B I a g e n t w h o h a s s p e n t a b i g c h u n k o f h i s

    c a r e e r i n v e s t i g a t i n g d i p l o m a m i l l s .

    A t h i r d - y e a r O s g o o d e H a l l L a w S c h o o l s t u d e n t , F r e d e r i c k , 2 8 , i s o n t h e l i s t a sh a v i n g p a i d $ 1 , 1 0 9 f o r a " B . A . " i n B u s i n e s s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n , p l u s a t r a n s c r i p t o f

    m a r k s . U s i n g t h e d e g r e e t r a n s c r i p t , F r e d e r i c k g o t i n t o O s g o o d e a s o n e o f 2 9 0

    s t u d e n t s s e l e c t e d f r o m 2 , 5 0 0 a p p l i c a n t s i n 2 0 0 6 . [ Q u e s t i o n W h e r e w a s t h e

    s c r e e n i n g , h e r e ? ]

    [ h t t p : / / w w w . t h e s t a r . c o m / n e w s / i n v e s t i g a t i o n s / p r i v a t e c a r e e r c o l l e g e s / a r t i c l e / 5 5 3 3 3 0

    - - p h o n y - d e g r e e s - c a t c h - u p - t o - b u y e r s ]

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    45/59

    The dean of admissions at MIT was forced to resign in 2007 for falsifyingherresume.[ ]The vice dean of the Graduate School of Education at the University ofPennsylvania resigned Thursday, one day after he was placed onadministrative leave pending an investigation into his false claim tohave a doctoral degree. [http://www.academicjobstoday.com/news-1658-Penn_education_graduate_school_vice_dean_Doug_Lynch_resigns_over_questions_about_his_doctoral_credentials.html 27 April 2012 ]On Monday morning, President Pamela Gann of Claremont McKennaCollege announced via email to members of the CMC community that asenior administrator at the Office of Admission had been reportinginaccurate SAT statistics since 2005. - January 30, 2012 at 12:54 pm [

    http://cmcforum.com/news/01302012-cmc-office-of-admission-falsely-repor]

    http://cmcforum.com/news/01302012-cmc-office-of-admission-falsely-reported-sat-scoreshttp://cmcforum.com/news/01302012-cmc-office-of-admission-falsely-reported-sat-scores
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    46/59

    Spam sent out

    Buy Custom Made University Diplomas, FakeCollege Degrees and Transcripts of World

    Famous Universities. recommends this siteYour friend Buy Custom Made University Diplomas, Fake College Degrees and Transcriptsof World Famous Universities. (.) has recommended this site to you, and sends you thefollowing message:*******************************************************************************Buy fake/novelty university diplomas and degrees online. We design our Degree or DiplomaCertificates and Transcripts to look 99.99% identical to world famous originals includingidentical security grade transcript paper, identical water markings, raised-ink crests,

    embossed seals, correct card stock weight (60-100lb depending upon institutionspecifications). Most post-secondary institutions available. ---> http://realisticdiploma.cu.cc

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    47/59

    Better controls over degrees andtranscripts

    Biometric identification one calling for itcould require one submitting credential tovalidate it by fingerprint, etc.

    Hologram and/or manufacture in samemanner as paper money

    Verify issuance with university by internetand in person

    Transcript serial number printed on degree

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    48/59

    Question of information integrity

    Problem: Source of most peoples information -Google, blogs, opinions

    Solution: Require epistemology in all curriculums

    integrated with subjects in all grades summarycourse in both high school and college on infrequency as the teaching of country's language(in the case of the U.S., English)

    Require critical thinking, philosophy, and logic inboth high school and college, as well as corecurriculum

    Wh ?

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    49/59

    Where are we?

    Alaric only sacked Rome for its gold the society was

    already gutted.

    A hi

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    50/59

    Are we approaching a newMedievalism?

    Bhaskaranaidu -http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clear_picture_of_moat_at_rayavellore_fort.JPG

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clear_picture_of_moat_at_rayavellore_fort.JPGhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clear_picture_of_moat_at_rayavellore_fort.JPG
  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    51/59

    We need to avoid this!

    Wait too fast we need to resolve one issue -Are we willing to internalize a life and knowledgesustaining value system?

    What are our values?Once we have affirmed them, THEN we canproceed.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    52/59

    Before anything - 'Know Thyself'

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    53/59

    Time for instrumentation

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    54/59

    Basic standards

    Who is the author? What is her/his background what qualifications does s/he have towrite about the subject? With what organizations or individuals is/are the author(s) associated

    that might suggest a bias? Under what circumstances is the author writing that might contribute

    to a bias? How current is the information? In what context is the information framed? What method was to obtain the information? In what location was the information prepared or formulated?

    How plausible is the information? How skeptical should you be? How tight is the argumentation? How well is the information documented?

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    55/59

    Beliefand knowledge

    Epistemology accounting for HOW do weknow

    Tradition

    History Logic

    Empiricism

    Science

    Faith

    P t l i

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    56/59

    Programme to solve peer reviewproblem must include

    Need WILL to do something

    Plan and means to carry it out

    Action actual participation

    Knowledge of standards

    Ethics

    Screening of reviewers (education, area ofcompetence, reviewing history, etc.)

    Kno ledge Generation and

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    57/59

    Knowledge Generation andCommunication Management

    Knowledge from information from data

    Communication how to convey it interdisciplinary means

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    58/59

    What can KGCM do?

    Act is arbitrator

    Help establish common standards

    Act as pre-reviewer for writers, and

    reviewers Be a forum for writers, editors, readers, and

    peer reviewers

    Link together those in charge of peerreviewing venues editors, conferencechairs, etc.

  • 8/22/2019 What to Do About Peer Review-1

    59/59

    What can YOU do?JOIN US in the ongoing workshop at this

    conference and work with us in the future inadvancing our programme. The room forimproving the process is endless.