when analog cinema becomes digital memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ kiaorostami... ·...

26
When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory… Tafler, David. Wide Angle, Volume 21, Number 1, January 1999, pp. 181-204 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article Access Provided by University of Florida Libraries at 06/15/11 12:55AM GMT http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/wan/summary/v021/21.1tafler.html

Upload: others

Post on 09-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…

Tafler, David.

Wide Angle, Volume 21, Number 1, January 1999, pp. 181-204 (Article)

Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press

For additional information about this article

Access Provided by University of Florida Libraries at 06/15/11 12:55AM GMT

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/wan/summary/v021/21.1tafler.html

Page 2: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

180

Fig. 1. Ken Jacobs and The Nervous System, performance at the Pacific Film Archive,Berkeley, October 1994. Photo by Ken Paul Rosenthal.

Page 3: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

181

When Analog CinemaBecomes Digital

Memory…by David I. Tafler

Introduction: Memory as Open Territory

For a brief moment in time, film/videomakers may join with empowered spec-tators and open up the boundaries of the cinema machine. In a unique reflexive

environment, film/videomakers and spectators can unravel their own memory/history. Each, in their own way, may dredge the matrix of their home environ-

ment—the country landscape, the urban grid, the tenement clusters, ethnicneighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation.

The landscape models the intersections in their work, complex networks ofintermittent movement, commerce, and ideas. The bonds stretch between the

text and the spectator. Memory and technology become inseparable, the effectsof each structuring the other. Prodding a living memory, the tools mediate the

social experience and the social, political implications of the captured image.

Efforts to explore the relationship between the social and the technical havetaken many forms by many artists. Media artist Peter d’Agostino describes a

childhood experience of flinching and ducking when the 3D objects came fly-ing out of the cinema screen in the nineteen-fifties. He imagines how Lumière’s

David I. Tafler is Head of the Communication Department of Muhlenberg Collegein Allentown, Pennsylvania. He has written extensively on interactive media andnew technologies and co-edited a book with Peter d’Agostino titled TRANSMISSION:Toward A Post-Television Culture. He is currently working with the Pitjantjatjara andYankunytjatjara people in central Australia on the development of their telecom-munication environment.

WIDE ANGLE NO. 1 (JANUARY 1999), pp. 177-200.V O L . 2 1© OHIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF FILM

Page 4: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

182

Train Coming Into The Station prompted some discomfort on the part of an audi-ence that realized the illusion but could not break away from reacting to its

shocking effects. While the “high tech” of the eighteen-nineties now looksrelatively crude, at the turn of the century people ducked and scrambled out

of the way of this virtual train reality.

In the nineteen-sixties, Austrian film artist Peter Kubelka designed a cinematheater which enclosed the spectator in a wooden cocoon. Wooden partitions

isolated the individual from the other members of the audience in order tominimize the possibility of anything distracting the spectator from his/her rela-

tionship with the images projected on the screen. Not surprisingly, an indi-vidual experiences the cinema differently when isolated from the audience.

For example, laughing patterns change when partitions break up the group.

At times, audiences can lose their restraint. Spectators can lose their individualidentity or willingness to process information individually. Group identity pre-

vails. In a commercial venue, teenagers will vocally deride the manipulativeconditions of a film by collectively resisting its operation. The audience resists

the film’s passion and its emotional engagement by calling attention to it. Theyscream back at the characters by taunting the walking spectres. In a non-com-

mercial screening, for example at the Museum of Modern Art in New York,adult audiences fresh from their odyssey through galleries of abstract paintings

will vent their displeasure at watching an abstract film. When an audienceyields to the filmmaker’s temporal control, its expectations narrow.

We continue to invent the cinema. As film becomes video becomes digital, the

cinema remains a fluid vehicle, perpetually in process, unstable in its projectionand reception, and more difficult to interpret and deconstruct.1 Accompanying

each shift, options appear that expand the possibilities for resistance within thetext by forming gaps in the flow of the experience. Those intervals provide an

opportunity for reconstructing meaning. The forks in the road set up decision-making junctures. Each becomes a moment of silence, a negative space. Posi-

tioned to maneuver within those gaps, film and video makers and spectatorscan incrementally break down and gradually rebuild the codes binding them

in their experience.

Page 5: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

183

Newer interactive work restores temporal freedom, but at what cost? Newdecisionmaking intervals affect the arrangement of movie fantasies and

speculations. At the very least, the maker/spectator pauses and assesses thesituation before the text can move on. The prevailing cinema, television, de-

parts from the coherence of classical drama. Navigating branches that overlap,intersect, and diverge in different directions, home television spectators channel

graze, mute, record, replay, or ignore given sequences. Television commercialinterruptions and their offspring MTV (music television) reinforce these inter-

ruptive, fragmenting, and often abrasive patterns.

No longer “ceaselessly restoring the illusion of the homogeneous and the con-tinuous,” television, nevertheless, approaches the real by “confirming the

spectator in his or her ‘natural’ relationship with the world,” “reduplicating theconditions of his or her ‘spontaneous’ vision and ideology.”2 Only the reality

out there has changed. In that revised reality, specific socially motivated rep-resentations trigger programmable memory. Most common, the instant-replay

experience, prevalent during the screening of sporting events on commercialtelevision, generates a brief intervalic fascination for a fleeting event. It invests

that event with inflated importance, accompanying it with a dramaticallycharged voice-over that makes the moment into an immediate memory. In the

cinema, dramatic, non-diegetic music may have the same effect.

Analog causality creates seminal moments within a play of events. It shapes orchoreographs particular gestures and actions within an overall sequence. Seam-

less, ephemeral, and manipulable, key events rise and fall with causal regularity,changing gradually, occasionally more dramatically, but always progressively in

response to numbers of stimulating factor(s). Within this fabricated encounter,the individual’s experience, feeling, and thought flows with each dramatic wave.

Interruptive junctures disrupt the continuity and restore the boundaries be-tween the spectator and the screen.

Decisionmaking presents variables in the formation of a collective memory

where makers and viewer-participants hover between recorded events andtheir after effects. A number of film and video artists have probed this terrain

bridging early and late twentieth century techno-social transitions. Filmmakers

Page 6: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

184

who continue to work in a post-futuristic niche ruminate on the short-livedworld captured and recreated by a mechanical cinema. Videomakers, a half a

generation later, mark film’s electronic genesis. Technologically, the positioningof the spectator becomes significant.

Spectator and Screen

The move to digital media marks a site of convergence for so-called “experi-

mental/avant-garde” film and video, the two major exploratory moving imagecanons of the past thirty years. As both film and tape become technical anach-

ronisms, their memory and legacy open the portal for a second reading.D’Agostino’s cybernetic installation VR/RV: a Recreational Vehicle in Virtual Reality

explores the video to VR (virtual reality) genesis and the geography of represen-tation inscribed by this transition. Filmmaker Ken Jacobs’s analytical study of

an old short Tom, Tom, The Piper’s Son reinvents the cinema, revisiting its origins,probing the boundary between fascination and meaning. One hundred years

ago, George Melies used the cinema to build his own fantastic narratives,while the Lumière Brothers rooted their films in documenting everyday actu-

alities. Looking at their work today sews together traces of the inscribed eventsrecorded in their fluid encounter with a shifting conceptual and technical envi-

ronment. That environment threatens to disappear altogether over time.

Digital media anticipates the complete devolution of the screen by building acinematic experience that “is made to happen in your head.” At the same

time, it adheres to the old apparatus and the century old ways of manipulatingperception. The “living” factor becomes the presence of the artist as the pro-

ducer who makes the decisions to modify the recorded experience. No longerin charge (of the television remote), the spectator sits back and cognitively

dives into the screen. The images on the screen cohere within the spectator.

There is a violent decentring of the place of mastery in which since theRenaissance the look had come to reign; to which testifies, in my opinion, thereturn, synchronous with the rise of photography, of everything that thelegislation of the classic optics—that geometrical ratio which made of the eyethe point of convergence and centring of the perspective rays of the visible… 3

Page 7: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

185

From old film technology, the filmmaker assembled a time machine for unlayeringthe multi-dimensional reality recorded on the film. Hybrid machines com-

prised of odd shutters and analytical projectors warp the temporal-spatial ex-perience opening a portal through which Jacobs and his audience plunge into

the elisions shaped by the text. The mechanically driven intermittent systemprovides a path on which an audience moves forward conceptually, at the same

time encountering images from the past.

The use of retooled film technology warps one hundred years of motion picturehistory. The projector mechanism disassembles footage recovered one frame

at a time. Slowing down the film, disrupting its illusion of another reality, theevent emerges as an interactive experience. The event exists somewhere out

there, a projection forged somewhere in the cerebral cortex. D’Agostino de-scribes it as experiencing an “apparition happening in front of the screen; a

seance—something coming out at me, a kind of magic; vaudeville shows thattake the cinema back.”4 When the separation breaks down between the spec-

tator and the screen, “…the human eye loses its immemorial privilege; themechanical eye of the photographic machine now sees in its place, and in cer-

tain aspects with more sureness.”5 Digital cinema deconstructs the mechani-cal intermittent processing of images. It compresses, transmits, and unravels

visual information. Higher level operations supplant the eye.

On the simplest level, over 127 million receptor cells respond to light stimula-tion in each eye. Only one million fibers, however, transmit that information

along the optic nerve. The wiring in the eye reduces the registered signals,compresses the information to shifts in contours and contrasts, colors, and pat-

terns. A complex reconstruction, a figuration of associations, recollections, andrecognitions creates the illusion of a retinal image, a condition that an individual

with “normal” vision takes for granted. In short, new cinema experiences by-pass the illusions, the perspectival renderings that reinforce those illusion. They

penetrate “the codes of classic Western representation, pictorial and theatrical.”In essence, deep focus yields to deeper stimulation.6

According to Buckminster Fuller, ninety-nine percent of the universe remains

invisible. Forming the remaining one percent, a repository of permanent

Page 8: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

186

referents anchor all experience and memory. The construction of randomness,ordering chaos, becomes a key component of the interactive installation. The

interactive program forms a web of jumps and starts, a matrix of problematicintersections and decisions. Each choice made, each path bears different com-

plications. Within the virtual, metaphoric, and spiritual dimensions of theirwork, interactive media artists weigh the variables. Within the programmed

interstices of the installation, the spectator forms his or her own virtual, meta-phoric, and spiritual linkages. First person experience will not guarantee closure.

In his stories of cycles, dreams, and passing generations, writer Jorge Luis

Borges places narrative’s decisionmaking junctures within this ephemeral firstperson territory. He resists a rational determination that events must cohere

within some absolute system along a uniform linear plane. In “The Garden ofForking Paths,” Borges drew

an infinite serious of times, in a dizzyingly growing, ever spreading network ofdiverging, converging and parallel times. This web of time—the strands ofwhich approach one another, bifurcate, intersect or ignore each other throughthe centuries—embrace every possibility. We do not exist in most of them. Insome you exist and not I, while in others I do, and you do not, and in yetothers both of us exist…”7

Borges strips away the shrouds cloaking day to day artifice and reveals its fugi-tive underpinnings. He deconstructs time, challenging dimensional linearity

and rational coherence. Time remains fluid, ephemeral, and immaterial.

Comolli, in “Machines of the Visible,” refers to the social relations that governthe cinema spectator exchange, image verisimilitude, and plot engagement, as

a self-deception: “the spectator… expects to be fooled and wants to befooled.”

There is no spectator other than one aware of the spectacle, even if(provisionally) allowing him or herself to be taken in by the fictioningmachine, deluded by the simulacrum: it is precisely for that that he or shecame… We want… to be both fooled and not fooled, to oscillate, to swingfrom knowledge to belief, from distance to adherence, from criticism tofascination.8

Page 9: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

187

As seductive and powerful as the semblance to reality may seem on the screen,other factors mediate the engagement between the spectator and the text.

Jean-Louis Baudry describes one factor as simply the satisfaction of self-decep-tion. In his article “The Apparatus,” Baudry writes:

Freud hypothesized that the satisfaction resulting from hallucination is a kindof satisfaction which we knew at the beginning of our psychical life whenperception and representation could not be differentiated, when the differentsystems were confused, i.e. when the system of consciousness-perception hadnot differentiated itself…

A perception which can be eliminated by an action is recognized as exterior.The reality test is dependent on motricity. Once motricity has beeninterrupted, as during sleep, the reality test can no longer function.9

The spectator prospects these differences between cinematic artifice and its

encompassing reality, between reception and motricity. After the events havetranspired, how the spectator processes their history has its own reality.

History has no meaning outside of the positions constructed by the storyteller.

In “TLON, UQBAR, ORBIS TERTIUS,” Borges suggests that “it reasonsthat the present is undefined, that the future has no other reality than as

present hope, and that the past is no more than present memory.”10 Historicevents serve merely as synecdochic bridges crossing the strands of personal

experience with institutionalized memory. Memory exists ontologically asmalleable raw material. Within this fabrication, symbols, signs, critical events

or their presentations, often markers of cataclysmic disruption, prevail.

Viewer-participants become problematic gatekeepers when they mediate theirown memories.11 Framed, positioned, determined in their raised questions,

they discover that their identity remains entirely fabricated by outside forces.In “The Circular Ruins,” Borges taps this despair. Toward the end, the voy-

ager “…with relief, with humiliation, with terror, …understood that he alsowas an illusion, that someone else was dreaming him.”12 Fully programmed,

each decisionmaking moment becomes a part of the illusion. The optionshave no true choices. Every path leads home.

Page 10: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

188

In her essay “The Memory of the Senses, Part I: Marks of the Transitory,” C.Nadia Seremetakis describes memory as a protean abstraction within the per-

ceptual process.

Memory is the horizon of sensory experiences, storing and restoring theexperience of each sensory dimension in another, as well as dispersing andfinding sensory records outside the body in a surround of entangling objectsand places. Memory and the senses are co-mingled insofar as they are equallyinvoluntary experiences. Their involuntary dimension points to theirencompassment by a trans-individual social and somatic landscape.13

Cybernetic media goes one step further. It erases the boundaries of the body.

The individual becomes both a sender and a receiver, and a reservoir of infor-mation. The media apparatus revisits the material previously stored in the

subject and helps rebuild the individual’s memory along the lines of a particu-lar mediated condition.14

Theorist Jean-Louis Comolli argued that changes in media apparati and tech-

niques mirror audience “demands, desires, fantasies, speculations.” Thesesocial factors take precedence in the formation of what Comolli calls the “cin-

ema machine.”

The cinema is born immediately as a social machine, and thus not from thesole invention of its equipment but rather from the experimental suppositionand verification, from the anticipation and confirmation of its socialprofitability, economic, ideological and symbolic. One could just as wellpropose that it is the spectators who invent cinema…15

As information resources supplant manufacturing capabilities, as cinema toolsbecome interactive, their changing operating systems structure inscribed memo-

ries differently in the retrieval and fabrication of memorable events. Cyberneticsystems guide the individual through an experience shaped by short and long

term memory. The individual self-navigates toward his or her own reception.

Uncertainty tempers decisionmaking activity. With the passage of time, otherevents and perspectives compound, distance, compromise, and modify lingering

ties. Other moments establish new buffers, new junctures binding the eventwith exceedingly peripheral if not unrelated memories. Some filmmakers’

Page 11: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

189

work excavates memory by recovering old film footage and restaging its cap-tured events. The image becomes raw material, conjuring illusions that go far

beyond the recorded objects and figures originally seen on the screen.

My avant-garde is very reactionary, because I am still quite concerned aboutquality of film and the hit of the machine on our history and on our psyches.Before it is all whisked away, I actually want to reflect upon it and deal withits machine quality.16

For Ken Jacobs, eash frame operates as a potential junction in its relationship

to the frame before and after it. Compounding the complexity of moving sodeliberately from one frame to the next, a second projection system intermit-

tently and systematically probes the same material. Working with two identi-cal strands of film—very, very short pieces of film—Jacobs builds sixty min-

utes of intense experience out of sixty seconds of footage.

The demarcation of frames segments the continuity and provides numerousopportunities for interceding in the flow of the text. Each frame becomes a

digital switch, a stop-start decisionmaking junction, a site of “commotion” andinteraction. Jacobs calls these moments

‘eternalism:’ unfrozen slices of time, sustained movements going nowhereunlike anything in life (at no time are loops employed). For instance, withoutdiscernible start and stop and repeat points a neck may turn… eternally.17

Each stop and start, forward and reverse temporal decision that he makes

flicks a switch. Crossing each junction corresponds to the mental synapse trig-gered when moving from frame to frame, shot to shot.

In the sixties, Paul Sharits built repetitive series of visual icons, signs, and colors

into filmic loops. Tony Conrad manipulated light in The Flicker. Hollis Frampton,a photographer who became a filmmaker, continually juxtaposes the two. Un-

ravelling the cinematic process on the screen, Stan Brakhage, Ernie Gehr, andothers worked the image at the cognitive level of the spectators’ reception.

Restoring cinema as theater, they pushed the magic lantern process. In their

paracinematic performances, these artists choreographed the stops and starts

Page 12: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

190

and synaptic leaps of cinematic time and space. They built junctures usinglights, projected images, filters, and performers. On the stage, they created a

virtual environment, then placed their performers into that imaginary space.The audience, though not immersed in this virtual world, still entered into a

manipulated sensuous experience but remained aware of the manipulation.

In the shadow play of the seventies, Jacobs severed the two dimensional con-straints of the screen by moving the audience into an ephemeral three dimen-

sional world. On the cortical edge, Jacobs played with binocular stereopsis.The spectator donned a pair of Polaroid glasses, with respective lenses posi-

tioned at right angles to each other. Operating on the same psycho-perceptualprinciples as the head mounted displays (HMDs) used for enabling virtual ex-

perience, each lens confined each eye to the reception of a different tempo-rally displaced overlapping image projected through a corresponding Polaroid

filter.18 Manipulating these binocular, omni-oriented displays, Jacobs con-structed an imaginary space into which he projected his performers.

Despite its cybernetic overtones, the shadow play performance differed markedly

from the configuration of most contemporary VR installations. In d’Agostino’s VR/

RV installation, the experience of the spectator almost but does not replicate the

experience of riding in a recreational vehicle (caravan). The driver wears thehelmet but everyone else experiences the phenomenon on screen, watching

through the driver’s eyes. D’Agostino points out that the installation operates onthe same conceptual level as the camera on the moon. The monitor captures the

excitement of the performance, of an experience taking place in the spectators’real time, but taking place in a different, in an imaginary or distant space.

Jacobs does not enter VR’s realm of surrogate experience. Jacobs’s perfor-

mance space stretched to the tip of every spectator’s nose. Phantoms dancedwith live performers. The screen on the proscenium wall ballooned outward

visually enveloping each individual spectator, forming an arc from his or herparticular seat, within his or her head. The visual system rendered an abstract

pattern as a coherent vision, a viewer shared fascination that doesn’t necessar-ily adhere to any commonplace physical law.

Page 13: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

191

Jacobs began this exploration in the dark. In his feature length film Tom, Tom,

the Piper’s Son, Jacobs resurrects and then disembodies a short chase film made

by the American Mutoscope & Biograph Company in 1904. The mutoscopefilm depicts a boy running from his fellow townspeople with a pet pig that he

playfully absconded. A chase sequence ensues. Jacobs reshoots the film, frag-menting the action into a series of finite events. Jacobs

…took this old movie and translated it into the modern film sensibilities. Herephotographed it, dissected it image by image, frame by frame, detail bydetail, and came up with a movie of his own, seventy-five minutes long. Heachieved two things: he created a film of much greater visual and formalimpact than the original; and he set up a precedent of ‘film translation.’19

Jacobs does more than rupture the flow of the film. Slowing and stretching the

sequence, violating the continuity, breaking down each movement into itsconstituent gestures, each frame becomes a trace not only of the original staged

event, but of a relationship between the contemporary viewer and a represen-tation of past actors/characters/actions. The experience of Jacobs’s film con-

structs the bridge between a contemporary audience and a cinema being born.

…My camera closes in, only to better ascertain the infinite richness (playingwith fate, taking advantage of the loop-character of all movies, recalling withvariations some visual complexes again and again for particular savoring),searching out incongruities in the story-telling (a person, confused, suddenlylooks out of an actor’s face), delighting in the whole bizarre humanphenomena of story-telling itself and this within the fantasy of reading anybygone time out of the visual crudities of film: dream within a dream!20

The cinematic apparatus serves as a vehicle for studying the real people, theactors playing characters in front of the camera. The analytical overlay retraces

the inscribed record of each small action captured on the emulsion and exploresthe meaning of its viewing and reviewing many years later.

Each frame becomes a governor. Each individual image offers the option of

moving foward, backward, or repeating the frame. Jacobs choreographs themovement of the film through each of those decisionmaking junctions. By

slowing and arresting the film, by weighing, revelling in, or analytically assess-ing each continuity decision and motion, a spectator joins the filmmaker in

Page 14: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

192

“mining the existing film,” as Jacobs himself describes it.21

The individual attends to a specific part of the frame. The spectator focuseson one or on another element of the image. Each movement inscribes a meta-

level event. Only one step removed from the action, the viewer watchesJacobs travel through the antique text, constructing junctures and then push-

ing the buttons to plunge deeper and deeper into the material on the screen.

Jacobs effaces the illusion of real movement. A single frame, a photographembodied in the film remains the absolute and indivisible entity, frozen in

time and potentially frozen on the screen. The movement back and forththrough that captured moment becomes a catalytic event at the core of a sec-

ondary cinematic discourse. Prospecting the gaps in the film’s deconstruction,the viewer participates in that discourse.

In his more recent work, Jacobs manipulates memory using his invention called

The Nervous System to reconfigure audience perception and cognition. The

Fig. 2. Ken Jacobs and The Nervous System, performance at the Pacific Film Archive,Berkeley, October 1994. Photo by Ken Paul Rosenthal.

Page 15: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

193

spectator sits down, the lights dim and the image comes on—a strange, flicker-ing, sometimes indecipherable array of shadows, patches of emulsion, traces of

a recording. Ken Jacobs navigates the audience through a series of dual screen,syncopated film projections. He uses two projectors, modified by a large frontal

shutter, to present spectacles that combine and overlap syncopated filmic im-ages of recorded individuals and captured events. The two overlapping images,

each coming from one of the two independently operated projectors, flow inand out of sync with each other. As the images divide, wander, and periodically

combine, the spectator perceptually stitches the two components together. Thecognitive nature of that converging operation constantly changes as it fluctu-

ates from decisionmaking moment to moment.

Beyond excavating memories, Jacobs uses The Nervous System not as a prostheticdevice for resurrecting old images but as a time machine for moving freely within

virtual memory. In Two Wrenching Departures, Ken Jacobs’s two longtimeassociates, the late Bob Fleischner and Jack Smith, perform a free form ballet

choreographed by the rhythm and elision of Jacobs’s reenactment.22 Jacobsarrests and restructures their gestures; he distills the moments “closing in on (to

allow the expansion of) ever-smaller pieces of time.”23 The movement fromeach frame to the next opens that “fresh territory for sentient exploration.”24

…if picking at the texture of cinema, at the end of its filmic phase, seemsabout as inward as one can get, it’s because the name of this digging tool I’vedevised, The Nervous System, also designates a main territory of its search, thatplace where we’ve blithely applied mechanism to mind willy-nilly producingthat development of mind known as cinema.25

Having recorded the original footage, Jacobs annotates the imprint of the

event. His decisionmaking marks an active trace of his own time, a passagebehind both cameras.

At his Nervous System presentation of Ontic Antics (a play on a segment of an old

Laurel and Hardy film) at the New York Film Festival in October 1998, Jacobsexplained his fascination, his excavation of time and place.

I’m dealing with a phenomenon of movies, and movies in our lives andimaginary characters like Laurel and Hardy.

Page 16: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

194

I’m trying to locate something. What is this odd thing? I’m not someone thatlets go of things easily. History is not over for me. I’m plagued by it. I’m notthrough with it. I don’t like everything whisked away as quickly as it is. Icome from Williamsburg, but I might as well come from across the globe it’sall changing so quickly. Your hometown becomes another part of the planetafter twenty or thirty years. None of us can go home again. There must besome desire on my part not to give a glancing interdiction to things. The fewthings, people, the few places that I meet up with I want to hold, to taste, tosavor, to cry, to suffer, whatever it is. It has to do with attention.26

The image flattens out and the negative space, the holes in the image, becomemore prominent. In the figure-ground oscillation, the spectator enters into the

past, probing the darkness, as if the gaps in the film trigger the synapses in thebrain, at times in a one-to-one pas de deux.

With Jacobs behind the projector, The Nervous System captures the paradox of

all cinematic performance. The filmmaker occupies the unseen space beyondthe screen, behind the projector. In Stan Brakhage’s 1962 film Blue Moses, the

camera turns around at the direction of the onscreen character to ostensiblyfind the cameraman. Instead, it reveals a source of light coming from the pro-

jector. “No, it’s hopeless,” the characters cries lamenting the impossibility ofcrossing the cinema’s temporal spatial boundary.

The events transpire within the spectator’s head. When watching The Nervous

System performance of The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, the viewer works hard toassemble a gestalt from the vibrating traces of shapes and bodies, pulsating black

smudges on a gray background. Eventually, the scene coheres but not on thescreen. Similar to the fusion that transpires when binocular vision presents itself as a

single image, the performance emerges somewhere out there between the viewer’seyes and the screen, inhabiting a projected dimension of the viewer’s mind.

The Nervous System distorts the sender-message-receiver model.27 Orientation

shifts with the transformation of experience. Head mounted displays, touch-screens, and other devices mimic this operation of the mind. They, however,

immerse the individual within the experience rather than the experiencewithin the individual. In contrast to the smoking mirrors and magic of a Jacobs

performance, the VR spectator entraps him or herself in an enclosure, a helmet,

Page 17: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

195

a CAVE, a vehicle. As d’Agostino describes it, the spectator enters a VR/RV—a virtual reality recreational vehicle (caravan).28 Like Paul Sharits, Tony

Conrad, Scott Bartlett, and other film artists, Ken Jacobs anticipates this shiftat the same time resisting its implied metamorphosis.

For a number of years, film artists tinkered with both the material of recorded film

and the apparatus that restores its captured and implied movement and revisits itslatent content. They have stopped, reworked, and, in the process, reinvented film

technology. Jacobs continues to resist abandoning the fundamental character of amechanical chemical medium that inscribes visible images on an emulsion base, of

an intermittent process that gives recorded images life. Moving frame by framethrough a linear presentation, his film or video performances anticipate the stop-

start pattern of an interactive presentation. His interactive performances allow theviewer to participate in the mediation. They unravel and dissect the meaning of the

recording process while compiling the cumulative effects of the inscribed memories.

For these film artists, the text remains separate. When Jacobs sifts throughthe archaeological remnants of a filmic past, he attempts to, in his own words,

“draw some of it out for a deep look, sometimes mix with it, take it further orat least into a new light with flexible expressive projection.”29 Surprisingly,

mechanical film technology can indeed replicate the cognitive sophisticationof the more contemporary plug-in devices.

The cybernet can make narrative into a longer term fascination. Mediating

the engagement, more branches lead off in a greater number of different direc-tions. An increased number of variables clock the contextualized changes.30 A

time out in the installation, in the form of a moment or juncture, helps the in-dividual to process events through the malleable membrane of his or her own

personal experience, before that experience slips into unconsciousness.

Knots in the Weave

When the analog experience goes digital, each branch or fork mediates theboundaries of the text. As knots in the weave, they coalesce to form larger

Page 18: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

196

junctions that tie together the multiple influences, and threads surrounding aseminal event. Each player provides one more subroutine to the design of an

installation. If retained in machine memory, each subroutine contributes tothe growing context of the piece. The piece hovers between the actualities

recounted and the fantasies and voyages that it enables.

Efforts to suture the shrinking distance between the spectator and the screenhave an ongoing history. Each challenges the boundaries between an individual

and the larger audience. The ersatz “interactive” system available to QUBEsubscribers, a two-way “interactive” cable-TV technology in Columbus, Ohio,

took the form of a console attached to the television set. It enabled the homeviewers to “participate” in the programs by pushing one of five “response” but-

tons. D’Agostino’s Proposal for QUBE (1979) critiqued this corruption of two-way interactive television, its potential as well as its shortcomings. Delimited

choices do not empower decisionmaking. D’Agostino compares the viewer-con-sumer to “Sherlock, Jr.,” a character in a Buster Keaton film by the same name.

Keaton, the protagonist, dreams that he has the capacity to climb into the silverscreen and “participate” in the action. QUBE encourages this kind of fantasy.

D’Agostino, however, found that the prescribed interaction only operates on thelevel of a simpleminded game show. Since QUBE controls all the options, pub-

lic participation remains circumscribed. In d’Agostino’s Proposal for QUBE, theaudience would structure by consensus the sequence of a tape comprised of five

segments: a text, newspaper, photograph, film, and video performance. D’Agostinofactored in one hundred twenty possible variations.31 Although encouraged by

QUBE to do his “proposal,” bureaucratic red tape and delay prevented d’Agostino’stape from being aired.32 Sherlock, Jr. runs into the screen and gets thrown out.

Peter d’Agostino’s installation TRACES stretches the somatic landscape across

electronic dimensions. TRACES uses the fiftieth anniversary of the atomicbomb to frame its cataclysmic memory, an event beyond experience. Balanc-

ing personal reminiscences with global perceptions, in TRACES d’Agostinoweaves together fragments of his own recollections and observations as part of

a generation that lives with the threat of total annihilation. Revisiting his el-ementary school, the artist’s walk down the quiet, interior corridor retrieves

the memory of countless air raid drills.

Page 19: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

197

Co-existent with the installation’simages of a time once lived,33 a

TRACES website (http://www.temple.edu/newtechlab/TRACES)

links to live images of the GreenPeace Rainbow Warrior trying to

block French nuclear testing in theSouth Pacific. Like the radio inter-

play of Jacobs’s Blonde Cobra, thelive images on the web do not nec-

essarily sync with those of the instal-lation.34 The web, however, pre-

sents a parallel event from another time and place that repositions the specta-tor in his or her contextual experience. “If somebody wants to break through

the screen and tell you what the reality was about,”35 then their reaction willcontribute to the evolution of the text.

Nam June Paik’s retrospective Electronic Super Highway: Nam June Paik in the ‘90s,

morphs memories of a small town America that has changed over the pastthirty-five years. Historic signs, figures, and temporal indicators from an almost

nostalgic Americana evolve and dissolve across its own emerging electronic land-scape. Paik’s installations exercise a subtle control over the spectators attention

and processing. The electronic array fills in the contemplative space, removesthe silence between shots, shrinks the spectators conceptual maneuverability and

regulates the frame surrounding memory, a continuous ebb and flow with no divide.

Paik transforms the myths, those images of a recently expired sensibility: a woodenbillboard, an old post office reminiscent of the WPA mausoleums, the one room

schoolhouse—a decaying image of a living myth—into forty video sculptures.36 Asomewhat equivocal advocate of new electronic technology, Paik chronicles the

changing world. His work restages contemporary history into a flowing compres-sion of events. Wandering through the global community, the couch potato still

remains passive. The viewer, now an internet resident of what Paik calls “Cyber-town,” walks through the respective pavillions, changing the channels from site to

site with each becoming another contextual and structural proscenium.

Fig. 3. Still from TRACES. © Peterd’Agostino, 1995.

Page 20: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

198

Virtual reality, cybernetic experience—the most far-reaching phase in the evolu-tion of interactive technology—harbors the capability for recording the narrative-

in-process, the history of the participant’s decisionmaking activity. Like all newtechnology, it risks becoming excessively systematized by everyday experience.

Current VR has not yet achieved the means to construct a full cybernetic experi-

ence. VR remains a not yet realized destination. A simple prosthetic device,contemporary VR only suggests the freedom of liberating the mind from the

prison of the body.37 Nevertheless, controlling the synaptic process does allowthe voyager to enter cyberspace. That crossover satiates some latent desire.

The dream machine, however, has its blatent flaws. D’Agostino’s 1990 instal-

lation TransmissionS: In the WELL musters the false hopes and inflated fanta-sies vested in the world of electronic experience.38 Nested within a conical

tower—a totemic well—TransmissionS engages its own contradictions. Theinstallation’s features include an interactive touchscreen, a ceiling projection,

and an image of an eye glaring back at the viewer through a peephole. Thetext of the touchscreen took the history of the electronic cinema and wove it

together with two tragic memories fortified by their television coverage: ashort visual segment of the space shuttle Challenger explosion, and excerpts

from Italy’s twenty-four hour coverage of a failed rescue of an entrapped Ital-ian boy who had fallen into a well and who eventually died.39 The cathartic

effect becomes that of madness and imagination. Advanced communicationtechnology falls short of rescuing its subjects from the symbolic and ancient

terrors of falling from the sky and dropping into the earth.

Cyberspace, however, suggests alternative outcomes. According to NorbertWiener, “feedback is a method of controlling a system by re-inserting into it

the results of its past performance.”40 A more integrated feedback system al-lows the spectator to alter the method and pattern of performance. On the

other hand, too much freedom may inhibit interactive installations feedbacksystems from truly provoking an insightful experience.

Graham Weinbren and Roberta Friedman’s The Erl King and Weinbren’s laterinstallation Sonata make the continuity contingent on the viewer-partipant’s

own fascination. Each derives from tales, references, and psychoanalytic

Page 21: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

199

parables. They situate characters within complex literary settings overloadedwith evocative material. Not so easily seen, portals open and close within each

segment that bridge sequences and reveal hidden enigmas. When the specta-tor wanders into the text, he or she can bounce about the images or plunge

into the cavities surrounding their construction. Discovering some small partof the elusive interactive structure helps the viewer now become participant in

his or her reconstruction of the latent text.

Jeffrey Shaw’s The Legible City situates itself somewhat differently. It evolves fromthe viewer-now-become bicyclist’s navigation of a fabricated urban grid of words

posing as buildings. At each intersection, the viewer-cycler can turn or proceed.The viewer literally cycles through this landscape forced to notice, to read the

environment. That fascination, the novelty of activated perception and its at-tendant cognitive processing can last indefinitely, until one grows wary or weary.

In The Erl King, at each bridge or interval, the viewer-participant can make a de-

cision. Each decision, in turn, leads to a different path which leads to anotherdecisionmaking moment, and so forth and so on. The text becomes interactive

and the level of interactivity becomes directly proportional to the number ofcritical nodes that operate within the text and the multiplicity of interrogations

that appear at each juncture. In The Erl King, those junctures seem limitlessthrough an array of options that traverse each scene and fluctuate within each.

Sometimes, a menu appears on the screen. Most other times, “touching” thescreen will recreate the sequence adding or deleting characters, reconfiguring

audio-visual sync relationships. As the matrix of decisionmaking moments pullsthe audience away from the ideological drivers of a linear narrative text, in

the process it reinvests them with other emerging codes and structures.

The Cybernetic Future

The installation format enables the video artist to break the constraints. Un-fortunately, the most advanced systems preclude their own distribution.

D’Agostino’s installations occupy that edge. His most technically advanced,VR/RV, simulates a recreational vehicle (RV) traveling through a virtual environ-

ment of “utopian hopes and dystopian fears.” The voyager travels in a simulated

Page 22: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

200

Fig. 4. VR/RV: A Recreational Vehicle in Virtual Reality. © 1994 Peter d'Agostino.

recreation vehicle (RV), a comfortably familiar shielded environment.41 Eachdecisionmaking site forms the connecting tissue, the temporal markers conflating

the space and time of the atomic experience with the cybernetic adventure.

VR/RV explores the genesis of electronic technology. In this environment, theviewer-participant lies suspended, hovering between reception and illusion.

In the midst of that immersion, d’Agostino interrogates the meaning of illusionby asking “how do you criticize VR in VR?” His work turns in on itself, ques-

tioning process as well as content.42

D’Agostino intentionally calls attention to the artifice. Buildings becometransparent. The mountains resemble paper maché models. He interrogates

the effects of VR immersion and inhibits the seduction of the voyager. Somedistance prevails. The cybervoyager does not become Peter Pan, “I’m flying;”

a critical border splits the voyager enabling his or her intellect to examine theeffects of the overwhelming seduction of the immersion. According to

d’Agostino, VR needs definition, needs recontextualization.43 While William

Page 23: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

201

Gibson in his cyberpunk novels charts the implicit terror of VR, d’Agostinoestablishes the links between the cybernetic horrors that exist on the inside

and outside of cyberspace. Fifty years of memories anchor the passage intoany form of metaphysical future.

A protean apparatus that immerses the voyager in a topology of ideological con-

structions might never supplant the video game. Alas, a value system predicatedon achieving highest scores will probably remain the prevalent system for vent-

ing frustrations and playing out obsessions. That sort of system, however, doeshave the capacity to compile insights. Not simply a recording tool, a VR envi-

ronment can allow the viewer-participant to analyze and explore the meaning ofhis or her activity. At the same time, the spectator might shape his or her dis-

tance to the text and position within the rubric of the piece. Ken Jacobs describesthe border between staged memories and open-ended excursions. He explains:

This is not an improvised work. These are all chosen moments, chosenoperations. There are a lot of things that I am doing back there and there area million other things that can happen beyond what you’re seeing.44

All sorts of things can happen between the frames. VR permits the spectator

to get at some of that uncanny stuff “that cannot be photographed with thecamera, that cannot be made except in the brain.” When the recollection be-

comes a reworkable memory, the voyager can appropriate the virtual event.The investigation sustains an active dialectic that permits the voyager to

achieve a heightened awareness. Otherwise, the electronic drug seduces thepassive spectator en route to refabricating his or her history and memory.

Notes

1. An interactive platform depends upon the technology that makes storage andprocessing of an expanding number of subroutines possible. Fortunately, trendsdevelop and patterns emerge that allow for subroutines to converge with only smallvariations marking their difference.2. Jean-Louis Comolli, “Machines of the Visible,” in Film Theory and Criticism:Introductory Readings, ed. Gerald Mast and Marshall Cohen (New York: OxfordUniversity Press, 1985), 755.3. Comolli, 743.

Page 24: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

202

4. Discussion with Peter d’Agostino, September 20, 1998.5. Comolli. “Machines of the Visible.”6. The notion of the “retinal image” takes its place alongside “persistence of vision” inthe bin of convenience misrepresentations of complex human processing activity.7. Jorge Luis Borges, “The Garden of Forking Paths,” trans. Helen Temple andRuthven Todd, in Ficciones (New York: Grove Press), 100.8. Comolli, 758-59.9. Jean-Louis Baudry, “The Apparatus,” Camera Obscura no. 1 (Fall 1976): 115.10. Jorge Luis Borges, “TLON, UQBAR, ORBIS TERTIUS,” trans. Alastair Reid, inFicciones (New York: Grove Press), 25.11. A recurrent theme, for example, in work like Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon.12. Jorge Luis Borges, “The Circular Ruins,” trans. Anthony Bonner, in Ficciones (NewYork: Grove Press, 1962): 63.13. C. Nadia Seremetakis, “The Memory of the Senses, Part I: Marks of the Transi-tory,” in The Senses Still: Perception and Memory as Material Culture in Modernity (Boulder,Colorado: Westview Press, 1994), 9.14. See Jonathan Steuer, “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions DeterminingTelepresence, in Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality, Frank Biocca and Mark R.Levy, eds., (Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associations, 1995), 36-7.15. Comolli, 742.16. Ken Jacobs, New York Film Festival, October 11, 1998.17. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.18. HMDs work on the same principle of binocular parallax as 3D glasses.19. Jonas Mekas, Movie Journal: The Rise of a New American Cinema 1959-1971 (NewYork: Collier Books, 1972), 350.20. Filmmakers’ Cooperative Catalogue No. 6 (New York: The New American CinemaGroup, Inc., 1975), 132.21. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.22. Drawn from a portion of the footage shot by Jacobs for his film Star Spangled ToDeath.23. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.24. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.25. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.26. Ken Jacobs, New York Film Festival, October 11, 1998.27. The spectator experiences the recorded moment as a kind of dance, a pas de trois,an interdimensional embrace between living and dead performers. The Fleischner/Smith and Jacobs collaboration operates from both sides of the screen, from both sidesof the projector, across the impenetrable divide separating the living from the dead.Conjuring up traces of their existence, Jacobs projects his own previous relationship asan implied part of the ongoing continuum. The projector becomes a medium for bring-ing the two performers back to life, a time machine stretching across the continuum.28. A discussion with Peter d’Agostino on September 20, 1998.29. Ken Jacobs, notes from the artist.30. Building memory begins by separating an event from other branches clouding andrestraining its history and continuity. An individual’s mediation, the retention, dissec-tion, or elision of an event springs from both the omniscient forces that lie beyond thecentral text, and the key interlocutors nested within the text itself. The interlocutorswithin the text, salient points along a track, take the form of voices or other auditory

Page 25: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

203

instruments, symbols, camera operations and visual devices, or any combination of theabove. The individual, drawing from his or her own personal experience, brings theomniscent variables to the encounter.31. Peter d’Agostino:The Proposal for QUBE tape incorporates five segments ranging from theoretical con-cerns to everyday events and are in the form of: a text, a newspaper, a photograph, afilm, and a video performance. Given these five segments the audience would, by theconsensus of their response, determine the sequencing of the tape and see the resultsof that process. The formula I derived for the work was 5x4x3x2x1 to show that thissimple structure would yield 120 possible variations for editing the final sequence. (Iwas making reference to Eisenstein’s formula of 1+1=3, his theory of film montage as a‘collision of ideas,’ to make a statement about the kind of complexity that video andcomputer technology had now reached as it specifically relates to montage.) The ap-parent novelty of producing a videotape editing, in effect, by a public opinion poll.32. H. Drohojowska, “Don’t Touch… Now Don’t,” LAIC Journal, Los Angeles, Spring1977.33. Scenes of Hiroshima on the annual anniversary of the bomb—a staged die-in nearthe dome, the camera lingering on the faces of young Japanese men and women, cap-turing the incomprehensibility of the living mimicking death before the devastatedstructure that represents ground zero; scenes of Nagasaki, Pearl Harbor, and New YorkCity; scenes of the Japanese landscape take shape: a village, the forest, barbed wire,looking through the window of a train, a finger pointing, a waiting room, neon lights;scenes of passing trees, homes, small villages, unexpectedly lead to an image of theEmpire State Building, the sound of ticking, and graffiti ridden, post-apocalyptic, der-elict neighborhoods in New York City; Machito Square, brick building, streets and al-leyways in the neighborhood where Peter d’Agostino grew up. The reflection of thevideomaker on the glass door to an apartment dwelling dissolves to the 8mm 1950shome movie footage of the d’Agostino family gathered upstairs in their living roomwatching television; scenes of a birthday cake, a barbecue, a Communion procession, alocal marquee announcing the introduction of cinemascope.34. Ken Jacobs’s film Blonde Cobra requires that the projectionist follow a complex setof instructions syncing live talk radio with specific sections of the film during its pre-sentation.35. Attributable to Peter d’Agostino.36. “Electronic Super Highway: Nam June Paik in the ‘90s” was organized by the Mu-seum of Art, Inc., Fort Lauderdale and Exhibition management Inc., in Cincinnati. Itopened November 1, 1994, at the Fort Lauderdale Museum of Art, then moved to theIndianapolis Museum of Art and the Columbus Museum of Art in Ohio. After its in-stallation at the Museum of American Art in Philadelphia from October 1995 to January1996, the exhibitil will travel to the San Jose Museum of Art in California, the Jackson-ville Museum of Art in Florida, the Albright-Knox Gallery in Buffalo, New York, theNelson-Atkins Museum of art in kansas City, Missouri, and finally the Honolul Acad-emy of Arts in the fall of 1997.37. Frank Biocca and Mark R. Levy, Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality, ed.Frank Biocca and Mark R. Levy (Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associations, 1995), 7.38. TransmissionS: In the WELL, installed at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. SeeDavid Tafler, “Der Blick under der Sprung,” (“The Look and the Leap”), Kunstform,Bd. 103, September/Oktober 1989.

Page 26: When Analog Cinema Becomes Digital Memory…users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/ Kiaorostami... · neighborhoods, farmhouses, barns, and the recorded ghosts of their occupation. The landscape

204

39. The images include visual references to Edison, Marconi, and Mikola Tesla, therespective founders of the motion picture, wireless telegraph, and alternating current.40. Norbert Wiener, The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society (New York:Doubleday & Co., 1954), 61.41. The voyager travels down a two lane highway bordered by billboards. Each bill-board shows the images of memories related to the sites thematically encountered onthe map. Moving image fragments of war move the voyager to four separate points ona map: he West (the Rockies), the East (Philadelphia), the Mid East (the Persian GulfWar), and the Far East (Hiroshima). Hiroshima and the Persian Gulf War replace theheartland of the United States, the Mid West, with the bombed out overseas test sitesof American techno-miliary expeditions.42. Discussion with Peter d’Agostino.43. Discussion with Peter d’Agostino.44. Ken Jacobs, New York Film Festival, October 11, 1998.