When choosing which residency programs to apply to, these were the most important aspects considered (ranked highest to lowest).

Scope and volume of cases

Location near family

Fit with desired lifestyle (flexibility, work/life balance)

Program’s state or national reputation

Geographic location

Programs AOA   ACGME   TOTAL

  Interview Rank Interview Rank Interview Rank

0 27% 40% 42% 49% (1 person) (1 person)

1 9% 14% 8% 8% 4% 10%2 14% 9% 7% 4% 10% 14%3 8% 9% 3% 3% 8% 9%4 13% 9% 7% 6% 16% 14%

5 or more 29% 19% 32% 30% 61% 52%

Among those choosing one or more programs: Median 4 3 5 5 7 5

2013 Graduate Specialty Selections for Program Interviews and Ranking

14%

9%

• Applied to program in more than one discipline

• Ranked programs in more than one discipline

52%50%16%

87%

57%

• Ranked a residency program that is in Ohio in at least one of their top 3 residency choices

• Ranked a CORE program in at least one of their top 3 residency choices

Family medicine 26

Internal medicine 27Pediatrics

4

51% Traditional rotating internship - 8

7% Anesthesiology – 4Dermatology--- 2Diagnostic radiology – 6Emergency medicine – 9General surgery – 3Neurology – 4Obgyn– 7Ophthalmology—1 Orthopedic surgery – 4Oto/facial plastic surg– 1Pathology – 1Physical med & rehab – 1Psychiatry – 3

42%

SPECIALTIES2013 OU-HCOM MATCH DATA--

111 Matchesaugust 1, 2013

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

25%

50%

75%

100%

48%

63%60% 59% 63%

44%

60%

percent of ou-hcom grad matches aoa/dual program

2013 MatchOhio Medical School Comparisons

School OU-HCOM OSU WSU  UC NEOUMED UTCOM CWRU

Number of Students 110 205 101 188 107 164 210

PRIMARY CARE DISCIPLINES 51% 40% 50% 31% 36% 30% 32%

IM 24% 16% 24% 18% 20% 13% 19%

FM 23% 9% 11% 6% 7% 4% 4%

PEDS 4% 15% 14% 7% 9% 13% 9%

Data collected by Dr. Paul Ecklar, Mount Carmel Health Systems

*As of June 2013

Data collected by Dr. Paul Ecklar, Mount Carmel Health Systems

2013 Match

OUHCOM OSU  WSU  U.C.  NEOMED UTCOM  CWRU

TOTAL Class 110

205

101

188 107

164 210

OHIO Match  72% 45% 37% 43% 53% 35%

IM 24% 12% 24% 13% 20% 12% 18%Med Peds 0% 4% 0% 5% 0% 1% 1%FM 23% 9% 11% 6% 7% 4% 4%PEDS 4% 15% 14% 7% 9% 13% 9%GS 3% 6% 11% 7% 5% 5% 3%ANES. 4% 6% 9% 5% 5% 9% 5%E.M. 7% 14% 9% 8% 9% 9% 5%RAD. 5% 4% 1% 1% 7% 5% 3%OPH. 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 0% 4%ORT 4% 1% 4% 3% 7% 5% 5%PSYCH 3% 4% 5% 3% 7% 5% 3%OB/GYN 6% 7% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6%

*As of June 2013

PRIMARY CARE DISCIPLINES0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

51% 50%

40%36%

32% 31% 30%

% of 2013 grads matching to all primary care disciplines (FM, IM, PEDS)ohio medical school comparison

OU-HCOMWSU OSUNEOUMEDCWRUUCUTCOM

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%

24% 24%20% 19% 18% 16%

13%

IM

0%5%

10%15%20%25% 23%

11% 9% 7% 6% 4% 4%

FM

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%15% 14% 13%

9% 9%7%

4%

PEDS

% of 2013 grads matching to primary care disciplines by

specialtyohio medical school

comparison

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

25%

50%

75%

100%

72% 74%67% 63%

72%

% OF OU-HCOM CLASS MATCHING TO AN OHIO

RESIDENCYMATCH Trends

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

25%

50%

75%

100%

41% 45% 48% 49% 51%

% OF OU-HCOM CLASS MATCHING TO PRIMARY CARE

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

25%

50%

75%

100%

41%49% 46% 51%

42%30%

51%

% OF OU-HCOM CLASS MATCHING TO A CORE SITE

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

25%

50%

75%

100%

41%45% 48% 49% 51%

percent of ou-hcom class matching to primary care

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

16% 16%

27%

22%23%

13%15% 15%

18%

24%

12%14%

6%9%

4%

graduates matching to family medicine, in-ternal medicine, pediatricsfamily medicine internal medicine pediatrics

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

family medicine 16% 16% 27% 22% 23%

internal medicine 13% 15% 15% 18% 24%

pediatrics 12% 14% 6% 9% 4%

n 43 50 52 56 57

2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1614

9

7

1

Number of Programs with < 3 yr accred-itation

* 2013 needs right data

2010 2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

70%74%

70%74%

15%

7%12%

6%2%

6%

11%

3%

Percent of OU-HCOM 4th Year Students Matching to Their Top 3 Res-idency Choices

1st2nd3rd

Year Survey Taken

Respon

se Percent