where are they now? progress of 20 year revegetation sites in the mary river catchment

12
Biodiversity Fund monitoring: Progress of two 20 year old revegetation sites Tanzi Smith and Caitlin Mill

Upload: tanzi-smith

Post on 07-Aug-2015

15 views

Category:

Environment


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Biodiversity Fund monitoring: Progress of two 20 year old

revegetation sitesTanzi Smith and Caitlin Mill

Page 2: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

BioCondition Assessments conducted

• Based on Regional Ecosystem (RE)

• RE 12.3.7 Eucalyptus tereticornis, Casuarina cunninghamiana subsp. cunninghamiana ± Melaleuca spp. fringing woodland.

Page 3: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

1. Burton’s on the estuary

Page 4: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Baseline

Burtons, Mary River

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

BioCondition (Site-based Attributes)

Tree Canopy Score

Shrub Layer Score

Ground Layer Score

Recruitment of Canopy Species Score

Native Plant Species Richness Score

Non-native Plant Cover Score

Page 5: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Overall

• Despite reports the remaining reveg is progressing well– Few weeds– Leaf litter– Regeneration

• Beware….

Page 6: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

2. Anderson’s at The Palms

Page 7: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

The rat story

Page 8: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

2004

2013

Page 9: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Snow in summer taking the brunt of flood waters and protecting the reveg site

Page 10: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Baseline

Andersons, Mary River

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

BioCondition (Site-based Attributes)

Tree Canopy Score

Shrub Layer Score

Ground Layer Score

Recruitment of Canopy Species Score

Native Plant Species Richness Score

Non-native Plant Cover Score

Page 11: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

Overall

• Landholder is very happy with how the revegetation has protected the bank

• Site needs a helping hand• Some Cats Claw, Chinese Elm,

balloon vine • Dense pasture grass as groundcover• Very little natural regeneration• Slumps are continuing upstream of

the project site

• Biodiversity Fund project to commence here this financial year

Page 12: Where are they now? Progress of 20 year Revegetation sites in the Mary River catchment

River listening:

landholder loved this

too!