where is environmental statistics going? peter guttorp university of washington...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Where is environmental statistics going?
Peter GuttorpUniversity of Washington
NRCSE
Thanks
Noel Cressie
David Fox
Mark Kaiser
Doug Nychka
Eric Smith
Michael Stein
Jim Zidek
Colleagues at NRCSE
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
Topics I will not talk about
Focus on air quality–very similar issues in water and soil qualityMore work needed particularly in water quality issuesEcologySocial aspects of the environment
standardssocial ecologyenvironmental justiceenvironmental accounting
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
Space-time modelsX(z,t) = (z,t) + Y(z,t) + E(z,t)
mean + smooth + error
Simplifying assumptions:isotropystationarity (in time and/or space)separabilityz R2
Richard Smith’s talk tomorrow Nonstationary spatial models
Need non-separable, spatially and temporally heterogeneous processes on the globe, taking into account heightOften processes operate on different scales
€
Vertical distribution of ozone
French precipitation data
Altitude-adjusted 10-day aggregated rainfall data Nov-Dec 1975-1992 for 39 sites from Languedoc-Rousillon region of France.
California ozone
Spatial correlation structure depends on hour of the day (non-separable):
Global temperature
Global Historical Climatology Network 7280 stations with at least 10 years of data. Subset with 839 stations with data 1950-1991 selected.
Global correlations
isotropic nonstationary
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
The issue(s)
Air quality model components:EmissionsAtmospheric transportAtmospheric chemistryDepositionVisualization
Data from deposition monitoringImportant model use: scenarios•Compare model output and data•Combine model with stochastic components
Model assessment
Geostatistical approachTemporally and spatially data rich
Bayesian melding approachTemporally rich, spatially poor
Requires many model runs
Approximation approachStatistical modelling of model output
TIES session Thursday
Needed: assessment of uncertainty about model structure
Combining models and data
Mark Berliner’s talk tomorrow: Bayesian hierarchical models
Data assimilation
Stochastic downscaling
Stochastic partial differential equations
dc(t) = (q(t) – d(t)c(t))dt + c(t)dB(t)
source deposition concentration
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
Exposure issues for particulate matter (PM)
Personal exposures vs. outdoor and central measurements
Composition of PM (size and sources)
PM vs. co-pollutants (gases/vapors)
Susceptible vs. general population
2 years, 26 10-day sessions
A total of 167 subjects: 56 COPD subjects 40 CHD subjects 38 healthy subjects(over 65 years old, non-smokers)
33 asthmatic kids
A total of 108 residences: 55 private homes 23 private apartments 30 group homes
Seattle health effects study
pDR
PUFHPEM
Ogawa sampler
HI
Ogawasampler
T/RH logger
Nephelometer
Quiet Pump Box
CO2 monitor
CAT
PM2.5 measurements
Where do the subjects spend their time?
Asthmatic kids: – 66% at home– 21% indoors away from home– 4% in transit– 6% outdoors
Healthy (CHD, COPD) adults:– 83% (86,88) at home– 8% (7,6) indoors away from home– 4% (4,3) in transit– 3% (2,2) outdoors
Panel results
Asthmatic children not on anti-inflammatory medication:
decrease in lung function related to indoor and to outdoor PM2.5, not to personal exposure
Adults with CV or COPD:increase in blood pressure and heart rate related to indoor and personal PM2.5
Modeling approach
Estimate space-time field from monitoring data
Estimate individual paths from population data
Estimate ambient exposure from path integral over space-time field and house type infiltration estimate
Estimate non-ambient exposure from predictor variables
UNCERTAINTY!
Difficulties with health effects studies
Most studies deal with acute effects
Chronic effects potentially more serious
Opportunistic studies limit power
Very small health effects
Model uncertainty/model selection
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
Emissions data in US
Point sourcesmost data from industry self-reporting
daily or hourly data created from annual reports
only worst offenders are required to monitor
allowable emissions can depend on weather
Diffuse sourcestraffic data
heating–no data collected
Source-receptor models
Mass balance equation
mt = P at
m vector of mass of different componentsP matrix of emissions signatures
each row corresponds to a source
a vector of relative source contributions
Observe with additive errors
Identifiability problems
Need to choose chemicals so that –source profiles are distinctive–little or no chemical change in atmosphere
Generalizations
Space-time dependencemultiple receptorserrors spatially dependentsource profiles time dependentsource contributions spatiotemporally dependentuse air quality models to evaluate
chemistry in the airadvection and deposition
Back-trajectories to estimate actual emissions
A different approach
Time series of proportions (ignoring total mass)
Allows estimation of both P and a
Outline
Space-time (global) processes
Deterministic/stochastic models
Health effects
Emissions modelling
Statisticians in environmental decision-making
Multi-disciplinary research projects
Are statisticians good at herding cats?
Modern statistics focuses on collaboration more than consulting
Collaborative research centers
How to tell the prime minister the facts
Need tools to describe uncertainty concisely
Need to teach decision-makers to want two numbers
International projects
United Nations Environment ProgramIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
30 co-chairs and vice-chairs in three working groups. No statisticians.
Global Environment FacilityScientific and Technological Advisory
Panel15 members. No statisticians
STAP Roster of Experts430 scientists. No statisticians