where non-smooth systems appear in structural dynamics keith worden dynamics research group...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics
Keith WordenDynamics Research GroupDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Sheffield
![Page 2: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NonlinearityNonlinearity is present in many engineering
problems:Demountable structures with clearances and
friction.Flexible structures – large amplitude motions.Aeroelasticity – limit cycles.Automobiles: squeaks and rattles, brake squeal,
dampers.Vibration isolation: viscoelastics, hysteresis.Sensor/actuator nonlinearity: piezoelectrics… In many cases, the nonlinearity is non-smooth.
![Page 3: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
So, where are the problems in Structural Dynamics?
System IdentificationStructural Health MonitoringActive/passive control of vibrationsControl…
![Page 4: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
System IdentificationAutomotive damper (shock absorber)
Designed to be nonlinear.
Physical model prohibitively complicated.
Bilinear.
![Page 5: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
System ID
Standard SDOF system,
( ) ( ) ( )my h y f y x t
If nonlinearities are ‘linear in the parameters’ there are many powerful techniques available.
Even the most basic piecewise-linear system presents a problem.
![Page 6: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Everything OK if we know d – linear in the parameters.
Otherwise need nonlinear least-squares.
Iterative - need good initial estimates.
Can use Genetic Algorithm.
![Page 7: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Genetic AlgorithmEncode parameters as binary
bit-string – Individuals.Work with population of
solutions.Combine solutions via genetic
operators:
Selection
Crossover
MutationMinimise cost function:
21 2
1
ˆ( , , , , ) ( )N
i ii
J m c k k d y y
![Page 8: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Excellent solution:
Derivative-free.
‘Avoids local minima’.
No need to differentiate/integrate time data.
Directly optimises on ‘Model Predicted Output’ as opposed to ‘One-step-ahead’ predictions.
![Page 9: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
HysteresisSystems with ‘memory’:
Bouc-Wen model is versatile.
( )
| | | |n n
my cy ky z x t
z y z z y Ay
Nonlinear in the parameters.
Unmeasured state z.
Can use GA again – or Differential Evolution.
![Page 10: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Hydromount
Contains viscoelastic elements.
Valves (like shock absorber) produce non-smooth nonlinearity.
![Page 11: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Freudenberg Model1 2
32 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 1 3
3 4
4 1 2 4 4 4 2 3 3 4
4 5 4 3 3 4 6 1 3
7 3 3 3 3 3
8 2 4 9 1 3 10
( ) ( )
( | | ) | |
( | |) | | ( )
| | ( sgn( ))
( ) ( )
t t
t
t
t t t t t
z z
z l z l z l z z l z z z
z z
z h z z z z z h z h z
h h z h z z h z z z
h z h z h z
F h z z z h z z z h z k z
![Page 12: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FrictionVery significant for high-speed, high-accuracy
machining.
Need:Friction models,Control strategies.
Most basic model is Coulomb friction:
( ) sgn( )cF y F y
![Page 13: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Far too simplistic:Static/dynamic friction.Presliding/sliding regimes.Stribeck effect…
Various models in use: white/grey/black.
![Page 14: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Stribeck Curve
![Page 15: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
LuGre Model0 1 2
0
0
| |
( )
( )| |
1
LG
c s c
s
F z z y b
y zz y
s y
F F Fs y
yv
![Page 16: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
An Experiment
![Page 17: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Particle Damper
![Page 19: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Structural Health MonitoringRytter’s hierarchy:DetectionLocationSeverityPrognosis
Two main approaches:Inverse problemPattern Recognition
![Page 20: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Are These Systems Damaged?
Did you use pattern recognition?
![Page 21: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pattern Recognition: D2DData acquisitionPre-processingFeature extractionClassificationDecision
Critical step is often Feature Extraction.
![Page 22: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Dog or Cat
![Page 23: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Nonlinearity Again
Often, the occurrence of damage will change the structure of interest from a linear system to a nonlinear system e.g. a ‘breathing’ crack.
This observation can be exploited in terms of selection of features, e.g. one can work with features like Liapunov exponents of time-series; if chaos is observed, system must be nonlinear. But…
![Page 24: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Tests for NonlinearityHomogeneityReciprocityCoherenceFRF distortionHilbert transformCorrelation functions
![Page 25: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Correlation functions
Force
Deformation
])(')('[)( 2
'' 2 ixkixEkxx
![Page 26: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Holder Exponent
Acceleration time-histories
Holder exponent (In-Axis)
![Page 27: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SDOF Model of Cracked Beam
Parameter α ‘represents’ depth of crack
![Page 28: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Bifurcation diagram for α = 0.2.
![Page 29: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Problem is that system bifurcates and shifts in and out of chaos; features like liapunov exponents, correlation dimension etc. will not always work and are not monotonically increasing with damage severity.
Figure shows dependence on frequency, but same picture appears with ‘crack depth’ as independent variable
Are there better features?
![Page 30: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Rocking (Thanks to Lawrie Virgin)
![Page 31: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What needs to be done?Development of signal processing tools like
estimator of Holder exponent.Better friction models (white/grey/black).Parameter estimation/optimisation methods (as a
side-issue, convergence results for GAs etc.)Control methods for non-smooth systems.Versatile hysteresis models.Understanding of high-dimensional nonlinear models
(e.g. FE).
![Page 34: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Quantities that increase monotonically with ‘severity of nonlinearity’?
Engineers like random excitation - tools for stochastic DEs and PDEs with non-smooth nonlinearities.
Contact/friction models for DEM.Sensitivity analysis/uncertainty propagation methods
for systems that bifurcate.
![Page 35: Where Non-Smooth Systems Appear in Structural Dynamics Keith Worden Dynamics Research Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Sheffield](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649cd65503460f9499e63b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
AcknowledgementsLawrie Virgin (Duke University)Chuck Farrar, Gyuhae Park (Los Alamos
National Laboratory)Farid Al Bender (KUL, Leuven)Jem Rongong, Chian Wong, Brian Deacon,
Jonny Haywood (University of Sheffield)Andreas Kyprianou (University of Cyprus)