which radiographic indices should we measure in hallux valgus?

12
Kyoung Min Lee , MD, Chin Youb Chung, MD Tae Won Kim, MD, Ki Hyuk Sung, MD, Bekzod Ahmedov, MD, Dong Yeon Lee, MD, Sang Hyeong Lee, MD, Dae Gyu Kwon, MD, and Moon Seok Park, MD. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

Upload: nguyencong

Post on 13-Jan-2017

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

Kyoung Min Lee, MD, Chin Youb Chung, MD

Tae Won Kim, MD, Ki Hyuk Sung, MD, Bekzod Ahmedov, MD, Dong Yeon Lee, MD, Sang Hyeong Lee, MD, Dae Gyu

Kwon, MD, and Moon Seok Park, MD.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea

Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux

Valgus?

Page 2: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

• My disclosure is in the Final AOFAS Program Book.

• I have no potential conflicts with this presentation.

Page 3: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Introduction

• Hallux valgus is a common 3D foot deformity.

• X ray measurements are performed on one plane and the relationship between the measurements of different planes has not been established.

• This study investigated the various measures to establish (1) the reliability; (2) relationship; and the ability to predict hallux valgus angle.

Page 4: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Patients and Methods

• 732 patients who underwent radiographic evaluation for hallux valgus

• Radiographic indices included hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, proximal phalangeal articular angle, simplified metatarsus adductus angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance.

Page 5: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Data analysis

• Intra- and interobserver reliability

– ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient)

• Relationship between radiographic indices

– Pearson’s correlation coefficient

• Predictability for hallux valgus angle

– Multiple regression anlaysis

Page 6: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Results

Table 1. Patients’ demographics and summary of radiographic measurements Patients’ and radiographic information Mean No. 732 Age (years) 51 (SD 17) Male:female 107: 625 Right:left 367: 365

Radiographic measurements HVA (°) 23 (SD 11; range, 5-70) IMA (°) 12 (SD 4; range, 2-36) IPA (°) 11 (SD 7; range, -16 to 65) DMAA (°) 11 (SD 8; range, -10 to 62) PPAA (°) 4 (SD 5; range, -12 to 29) Metatarsus adductus (°) 25 (SD 6; range, 6-53) First MT protrusion (mm) 2 (SD 3; range, -17 to 18) SRA (°) 9 (SD 13; range, -22 to 60) HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.

Page 7: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Results

Table 2. Interobserver reliabilities of radiographic measurements Reliability HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA Metatarsus

adductus First MT protrusion

SRA

ICC (95% CI)

0.985 (0.975-0.992)

0.896 (0.832-0.940)

0.860 (0.777-0.919)

0.380 (0.149-0.592)

0.719 (0.579-0.829)

0.620 (0.452-0.760)

0.901 (0.836-0.943)

0.925 (0.875-0.958)

HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.

Table 3. Intraobserver reliabilities of radiographic measurements Reliability HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA Metatarsus

adductus First MT protrusion

SRA

ICC (95% CI)

0.989 (0.979-0.994)

0.914 (0.841-0.954)

0.884 (0.790-0.937)

0.781 (0.622-0.878)

0.819 (0.681-0.901)

0.756 (0.583-0.864)

0.944 (0.897-0.970)

0.952 (0.909-0.975)

HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.

Page 8: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Results

Table 4. Correlation matrix of radiographic measurements

Radiographic measurements HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA

Metatarsus adductus

First MT protrusion

IMA 0.621 (< 0.001) IPA -0.438 -0.382 (0.001) (< 0.001) DMAA 0.636 0.467 -0.323 (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001)

PPAA -0.363 -0.297 0.284 -0.284 (0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001)

Metatarsus adductus

0.112 0.048 0.072 0.055 0.001

(0.002) (0.197) (0.051) (0.134) (0.972) First MT protrusion

0.375 0.196 -0.113 0.246 -0.116 0.256

(< 0.001) (< 0.001) (0.002) (< 0.001) (0.002) (< 0.001)

SRA 0.598 0.470 -0.348 0.461 -0.353 -0.071 0.203 (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (0.060) (< 0.001) HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.

Page 9: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Results

Table 5. Multiple regression analysis to identify significantly contributing radiographic measurements to hallux valgus angle

Radiographic measurements Non-standardized Standardized

beta t p value B Standard error

Coefficient 5.798 1.508 3.845 < 0.001 IMA 0.794 0.085 0.265 9.325 < 0.001 IPA -0.218 0.046 -0.125 -4.747 < 0.001 DMAA 0.388 0.037 0.296 10.536 < 0.001 PPAA -0.095 0.062 -0.039 -1.523 0.128

Metatarsus adductus 0.108 0.041 0.064 2.622 0.009

First MT protrusion 0.588 0.094 0.157 6.287 < 0.001

SRA 0.212 0.024 0.251 8.694 < 0.001 IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.

Page 10: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Conclusion

• Hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and first metatarsal protrusion distance are worth measuring in the hallux valgus deformity considering their reliability and predicting the three-dimensional hallux valgus deformity.

Page 11: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

References

1. Balding MG, Sorto LA Jr. Distal articular set angle. Etiology and x-ray evaluation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985;75:648-652.

2. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331-1335.

3. Bryant A, Tinley P, Singer K. A comparison of radiographic measurements in normal, hallux valgus, and hallux limitus feet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39:39-43.

4. Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 8th ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.

5. D'Arcangelo PR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Menz HB. Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:20.

6. Easley ME, Wiesel SW. Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

7. Engel E, Erlick N, Krems I. A simplified metatarsus adductus angle. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1983;73:620-628.

8. Farsetti P, Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:257-265.

9. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observation on hallux valgus; base on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33:376-391.

10. Hawkins FB, Mitchell CL, Hedrick DW. Correction of hallux valgus by metatarsal osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27:387-394.

11. Jay RM. Pediatric Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 1999.

12. Judge MS, LaPointe S, Yu GV, Shook JE, Taylor RP. The effect of hallux abducto valgus surgery on the sesamoid apparatus position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999;89:551-559.

13. Kuwano T, Nagamine R, Sakaki K, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y. New radiographic analysis of sesamoid rotation in hallux valgus: comparison with conventional evaluation methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:811-817.

14. Lorimer DL, Neale D, French GJ. Neale's Disorders of the Foot: Diagnosis and Management. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.

Page 12: Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux Valgus?

SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL

Thank you !