which radiographic indices should we measure in hallux valgus?
TRANSCRIPT
Kyoung Min Lee, MD, Chin Youb Chung, MD
Tae Won Kim, MD, Ki Hyuk Sung, MD, Bekzod Ahmedov, MD, Dong Yeon Lee, MD, Sang Hyeong Lee, MD, Dae Gyu
Kwon, MD, and Moon Seok Park, MD.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Republic of Korea
Which Radiographic Indices Should We Measure in Hallux
Valgus?
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
• My disclosure is in the Final AOFAS Program Book.
• I have no potential conflicts with this presentation.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Introduction
• Hallux valgus is a common 3D foot deformity.
• X ray measurements are performed on one plane and the relationship between the measurements of different planes has not been established.
• This study investigated the various measures to establish (1) the reliability; (2) relationship; and the ability to predict hallux valgus angle.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Patients and Methods
• 732 patients who underwent radiographic evaluation for hallux valgus
• Radiographic indices included hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, distal metatarsal articular angle, proximal phalangeal articular angle, simplified metatarsus adductus angle, first metatarsal protrusion distance.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Data analysis
• Intra- and interobserver reliability
– ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient)
• Relationship between radiographic indices
– Pearson’s correlation coefficient
• Predictability for hallux valgus angle
– Multiple regression anlaysis
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Results
Table 1. Patients’ demographics and summary of radiographic measurements Patients’ and radiographic information Mean No. 732 Age (years) 51 (SD 17) Male:female 107: 625 Right:left 367: 365
Radiographic measurements HVA (°) 23 (SD 11; range, 5-70) IMA (°) 12 (SD 4; range, 2-36) IPA (°) 11 (SD 7; range, -16 to 65) DMAA (°) 11 (SD 8; range, -10 to 62) PPAA (°) 4 (SD 5; range, -12 to 29) Metatarsus adductus (°) 25 (SD 6; range, 6-53) First MT protrusion (mm) 2 (SD 3; range, -17 to 18) SRA (°) 9 (SD 13; range, -22 to 60) HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Results
Table 2. Interobserver reliabilities of radiographic measurements Reliability HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA Metatarsus
adductus First MT protrusion
SRA
ICC (95% CI)
0.985 (0.975-0.992)
0.896 (0.832-0.940)
0.860 (0.777-0.919)
0.380 (0.149-0.592)
0.719 (0.579-0.829)
0.620 (0.452-0.760)
0.901 (0.836-0.943)
0.925 (0.875-0.958)
HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.
Table 3. Intraobserver reliabilities of radiographic measurements Reliability HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA Metatarsus
adductus First MT protrusion
SRA
ICC (95% CI)
0.989 (0.979-0.994)
0.914 (0.841-0.954)
0.884 (0.790-0.937)
0.781 (0.622-0.878)
0.819 (0.681-0.901)
0.756 (0.583-0.864)
0.944 (0.897-0.970)
0.952 (0.909-0.975)
HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Results
Table 4. Correlation matrix of radiographic measurements
Radiographic measurements HVA IMA IPA DMAA PPAA
Metatarsus adductus
First MT protrusion
IMA 0.621 (< 0.001) IPA -0.438 -0.382 (0.001) (< 0.001) DMAA 0.636 0.467 -0.323 (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001)
PPAA -0.363 -0.297 0.284 -0.284 (0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001)
Metatarsus adductus
0.112 0.048 0.072 0.055 0.001
(0.002) (0.197) (0.051) (0.134) (0.972) First MT protrusion
0.375 0.196 -0.113 0.246 -0.116 0.256
(< 0.001) (< 0.001) (0.002) (< 0.001) (0.002) (< 0.001)
SRA 0.598 0.470 -0.348 0.461 -0.353 -0.071 0.203 (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (< 0.001) (0.060) (< 0.001) HVA = hallux valgus angle; IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Results
Table 5. Multiple regression analysis to identify significantly contributing radiographic measurements to hallux valgus angle
Radiographic measurements Non-standardized Standardized
beta t p value B Standard error
Coefficient 5.798 1.508 3.845 < 0.001 IMA 0.794 0.085 0.265 9.325 < 0.001 IPA -0.218 0.046 -0.125 -4.747 < 0.001 DMAA 0.388 0.037 0.296 10.536 < 0.001 PPAA -0.095 0.062 -0.039 -1.523 0.128
Metatarsus adductus 0.108 0.041 0.064 2.622 0.009
First MT protrusion 0.588 0.094 0.157 6.287 < 0.001
SRA 0.212 0.024 0.251 8.694 < 0.001 IMA = intermetatarsal angle; IPA = interphalangeal angle; DMAA = distal metatarsal articular angle; PPAA = proximal phalangeal articular angle; Metatarsus adductus = simplified metatarsus adductus angle; First MT protrusion = first metatarsal protrusion distance; SRA = sesamoid rotation angle.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Conclusion
• Hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, interphalangeal angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and first metatarsal protrusion distance are worth measuring in the hallux valgus deformity considering their reliability and predicting the three-dimensional hallux valgus deformity.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
References
1. Balding MG, Sorto LA Jr. Distal articular set angle. Etiology and x-ray evaluation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985;75:648-652.
2. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331-1335.
3. Bryant A, Tinley P, Singer K. A comparison of radiographic measurements in normal, hallux valgus, and hallux limitus feet. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39:39-43.
4. Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 8th ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
5. D'Arcangelo PR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Zammit GV, Menz HB. Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:20.
6. Easley ME, Wiesel SW. Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
7. Engel E, Erlick N, Krems I. A simplified metatarsus adductus angle. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1983;73:620-628.
8. Farsetti P, Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:257-265.
9. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observation on hallux valgus; base on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33:376-391.
10. Hawkins FB, Mitchell CL, Hedrick DW. Correction of hallux valgus by metatarsal osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27:387-394.
11. Jay RM. Pediatric Foot and Ankle Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 1999.
12. Judge MS, LaPointe S, Yu GV, Shook JE, Taylor RP. The effect of hallux abducto valgus surgery on the sesamoid apparatus position. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999;89:551-559.
13. Kuwano T, Nagamine R, Sakaki K, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y. New radiographic analysis of sesamoid rotation in hallux valgus: comparison with conventional evaluation methods. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:811-817.
14. Lorimer DL, Neale D, French GJ. Neale's Disorders of the Foot: Diagnosis and Management. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.
SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL ◦ SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BUNDANG HOSPITAL
Thank you !