why choose universal design as a design philosophy
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
1/57
B61Why Choose Universal Designas a Design Philosophy
www.HumanCenteredDesign.org
November 17, 2011Socially Sustainable Design
Build Boston
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
2/57
TheBostonSocietyofArchitects/AIAisaRegisteredProviderwithThe
AmericanIns6tuteofArchitectsCon6nuingEduca6onSystems.Credit
earnedoncomple6onofthisprogramwillbereportedtoCESRecordsfor
AIAmembers.Cer6ficatesofComple6onfornon-AIAmembersare
availableonrequest.
ThisprogramisregisteredwiththeAIA/CESforcon6nuingprofessional
educa6on.Assuch,itdoesnotincludecontentthatmaybedeemedor
construedtobeanapprovalorendorsementbytheAIAofanymaterialof
construc6onoranymethodormannerofhandling,using,distribu6ng,or
dealinginanymaterialorproduct.Ques6onsrelatedtospecific
materials,methods,andserviceswillbeaddressedattheconclusionof
thispresenta6on.
Welcome
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
3/57
Thispresenta6onisprotectedbyUSandInterna6onalCopyrightlaws.
Reproduc6on,distribu6on,displayanduseofthepresenta6onwithout
wriHenpermissionofthespeakerisprohibited.
Ins6tuteforumanCenteredDesign,2011
Copyright Materials
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
4/57
Session Objectives
Objec6ve1:Understandthebasisforuniversaldesignanditsprinciples.
Objec6ve2:Garnerinsightintoculturalandsocialfactorsshapinghowwethinkaboutdesignforinclusion.
Objec6ve3:Exploretheimplica6onsforprac6ceifonechoosestointegrateinclusivedesign.
Objec6ve4:Learnspecificexamplesofprojectsthatintegrate
universaldesign.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
5/57
www.HumanCenteredDesign.org
Aninterna6onalnonprofitbasedinBostondedicated
toenhancingtheexperiencesofpeopleofallagesand
abili6esthroughexcellenceindesign.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
6/57
Presenters Clark Manus, FAIA,
President, AIA
CEO, Heller/Manus
Dr. Richard SimmonsVisiting Professor, University of GreenwichChief Executive, Commission for Architecture and
the Built Environment (until March 2011)
Susan SzenasyEditor-in-Chief, Metropolis
Valerie Fletcher, Executive DirectorInstitute for Human Centered Design (Moderator)
www.HumanCenteredDesign.org
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
7/57www.HumanCenteredDesign.org
Designpowerfullyandprofoundly
influenceseveryoneandoursenseof
confidence,comfort,andcontrol.
Varia@oninabilityisordinary,notspecial,andaffectsmostofusforatleastpartofourlives.
2coreideas...
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
8/57
aframeworkforthedesign
ofplaces,things,informa3on,
communica3onandpolicythatfocusesontheuser,on
thewidestrangeofpeople
opera3nginthewidestrange
ofsitua3onswithoutspecialorseparatedesign
or
Humancentereddesign
(ofeverything)
witheveryoneinmind
Whatis
universaldesign
inclusivedesign
design-for-all?
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
9/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
10/57
Three catalysts
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
11/57
1.Aging PercentageIncreaseinAge0+byRegion,2000-2050
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
12/57
#2Disability1Billion+peoplewithdisabili6es
80%inthedevelopingna6ons
Keyfactorsthatincreasethenumbers:
Newcondi6ons/risingincidence(e.g.diabetes,AIDS)Armedconflict
Naturaldisasters
Childreninpoverty
P liti l M f th W ld A il 2006
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
13/57
#3SocialEquity
(averydistant3rd
)
Anincreasinglydiverseworld-ability,ageandculture
Developingna6ons-inclusivedesignintegratedintodevelopmentacostneutralopportunity
Recogni6onofinterdependence
April 2006*Twenty-oneof 28Antarctic consultative
nationshavemadenoclaimstoAntarcticterr itory (although Russia andtheUnitedStateshavereservedther ighttodoso)and
they donotrecognizetheclaimsof theothernations.
120 60 0 60 120 180
30
30
0
60
30 3090150 90 150
60
120 60 0 60 120 18030 3090150 90 150
60
30
0
30
60
Equator EquatorEquator
Tropic of Capricorn (2327') Tropic ofCapricorn (2327')
Antarctic Circle (6633')Antarctic Circle (6633')
Tropic ofCancer(2327')Tropic ofCancer(2327')
Arctic Circle (6633')Arctic Circle (6633')
ARCTIC OCEAN ARCTIC OCEAN
Japan
HudsonBay
BlackSea
Philippine
Sea
N O R TH
PA CI F I C
O CEA N
S O UT H
A TLA N TI C
O C E A N
Caspian
Sea
Coral
SeaI N D I A N
O C E A N
O C E A N
Baltic
Bengal
S O U TH
O CEA N
Gulf
Tasman Sea
SeaAr al
Lake Balkhash
LakeBaikal
RossIce Shelf
Bayof
South ChinaSea
Barents Sea
LakeVic tor ia
LakeT anganyika
Ross Ice Shelf
ARCTIC OCEAN
Java Sea
Celebes Sea
AndamanSea
W h ite Sea
Sea of
Mediterrane an Sea
S O UT H
PA CI F I C
O C E A N
S O U T H E R N O CE A N S O UT H E R N O CE A NS O UTH ER N O CE A N
N O R TH
PA CI F I C
O C E A NSea
Yellow
Bay
Amer yIc eShelf
EastChinaSea
PA CI F I C
RedSea
Lake
Ronne Ice Shelf
Bering Sea
Nyasa
N O R TH
A TLA N TI C
LagoT itic ac a
LakeSuper ior
M ic higan
Hur on
Lake Er ie
Lake Ontar io
Lake
Lake
Sea
Arabian
NorthSea
NorwegianSea
Greenland Sea
Beaufort Sea
StraitStr ait
Denmar k
KaraSea Laptev Sea
EastSiberian Sea
Sea of Okhotsk
Davis
Baff in
Caribbean Sea
Gulf of Mexico
Gulf of Alaska
LabradorSea
Chukc hi
Sea
Banda Sea
Arafura
TimorSea
Sea
Luzon Str ait
Gu lfof
Per sian
Sea ofAzov
Gulf ofTonkin
GulfofT hailand
DrakePassage
Ross Sea
Bell ingshausen SeaAmundsen Sea
GreatAustralian
Bight
Gre a t
Ba
rrie
r
R e e f
GulfofCar pentar ia
BayofBisc ay
Sea
Lac c adive
M ozambiqueChannel
Gulf of Aden
Gu lfofSt. L awren ce
LakeW innipeg
SlaveLake
Bear LakeGr eat
Gr eat
GulfofGuinea
SeaCeltic
Sea
B oth n ia
Ross Sea
Scotia Sea
Weddell Sea
CUBA
COLOMBIA
PERU
BOLIVIA
CHILE
PAPUANEWGUINEA
ZEALAND
C AN AD A
MEXICO
BELIZE
HONDURAS
NICARAGUAEL SALVADOR
GUATEMALA
COSTARICA
PANAMA
R U S S I A
C H I N A
SURINAME
BAHAMASTHE
(U.K.)
THEGAMBIA
SWAZILAND
ZIMBABWE
ZAMBIA
ANGOLA COMOROS
SEYCHELLESTANZANIA
AFRICASOUTH
KENYAUGANDA
AFRICANREPUBLICCENTRAL
YEMENN IG ER
LIBERIA CAMEROON
GABON
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
GUINEAGUINEA-BISSAU
M AL IMAURITANIA
SENEGAL
CAPEVERDE
NORWAYSWEDEN
FINLAND
FRANCE
SPAIN
EST.
LAT.LITH.
ITALY
TUNISIA
LAOS
JAPAN
PHILIPPINES
MARSHALL
ISLANDS
SOLOMONISLANDS
FIJI
TONGA
K I R I B A T I
(FRANCE)
(administeredby U.K.,
(CHILE)
(NORWAY)
(administeredby U.K.,
(CHILE)
(SOUTH AFRICA)
(AUSTL.)
(AUSTL.)
(N.Z.)
(N.Z.)(N.Z.)
(N.Z.)(N.Z.)
(N.Z.)
(N.Z.)
(FRANCE)
(N.Z.)
(JAPAN)
(N.Z.)
(EQUA.GUI.)
(BRAZIL)
(BRAZIL)
(BRAZIL)
(FRANCE)
(YEMEN)
(SP.)
(PORT.)
(PORT.)
(U.K.)
(DEN.)
(U.S.)
(U.K.)
THAILAND
BANGLADESH
CAMBODIA
VIETNAM
S.A.R.
(INDIA)
MALDIVES
SRILANKA
SINGAPORE
BRUNEI
M A L A Y S I A
I N D O N E S I A
(AUSTL.)
(AUSTL.)
EASTTIMOR
A U S T R A L I A
NEW
(U.S.)
(U.S.)
NORTH KOREA
MOROCCO
(FRANCE)
(NETH.)
(NETH.)
TRINIDAD ANDTOBAGO
REPUBLICDOMINICAN
JAMAICA
( U. S.)
PARAGUAY
ICELAND
UNITED
KINGDOMIRELAND(U. K. )
( U.K. )( U. K. )
LIECH.SWITZ.
LUX.CZECH REP.
SLOVAKIA
ROMANIA
ALB.
BELARUS
SYRIACYPRUS LEB.
Indian1972
Lineof Controlc laim
LineofActualControl
(DENMARK)
UZBEKISTAN
U KR A I N E
MOLDOVA
GEORGIA
AZERBAIJANARMENIA
U N I TE D S TATE S
(U.S.)
(U.S.)
K I R I B A T I
I R AN
IRAQ AFGHANISTAN
PAKISTAN
ANDORRA
MARINOSAN
AUSTRIAHUNGARY
SER.&MONT.
CROATIASLOVENIA
BURMAI N D I A
NEPAL BHUTAN
T U R K E Y
(U.S.)
(U.S.)
(U.S.)
(U.S.)(U.S.)
NAURU
(FR.)
B R A Z I L
AL G ER I AL I BY A
EG Y P T
A nta r c tic a
BOS.&HER.
(U.K.)
(U.S.)
NIGERIA
SAMOA
(U.K.)
VATICAN
(SP.)
(U.K.)(SP.)
(IT.)(SP.)
(FR.)
(IT.)MALTA
NETH.
BELGIUM
DENMARK
JORDAN
ISRAEL
(GR.)
KUWAIT
BAHRAIN
QATAR UNITED ARABEMIRATES
OMAN
OMAN
GERMANY
POLAND
ST.VINCENTANDTHEGRENADINES
GRENADA
BARBADOS
ST.LUCIA
DOMINICA
ANTIGUAAND BARBUDA
ST.KITTSANDNEVIS
(ECUADOR)
(FRANCE)
(FRANCE)
(FRANCE)
M O NG O L IA
DJIBOUTI
BOTSWANA
NAMIBIA
TURKMENISTAN
KYRGYZSTAN
TAJIKISTAN
(FRANCE)
(Cabinda)
(FRANCE)
(FRANCE)
(AUSTL.)
(AUSTL.)
(AUSTL.)
BULGARIA
RUSSIA
GUYANA
URUGUAY
ECUADOR
(CHILE)
(CHILE)
(FRANCE)
(U.K.)
(NORWAY)
(NORWAY)
BENIN
TOGOD'IVOIRE
CTE
SAUDI
ARABIA
c laimedby COMOROS)
SIERRALEONE
(MEXICO)ERITREA
SOUTHKOREA
CITY
GREECE
MACEDONIA
AUSTRALIA
(KIRIBATI)
claimedby ARGENTINA)
(BRAZIL)MAURITIUSMADAGASCAR
(AUSTL.)(adminis teredby FRANCE,
(U.K.)
PALAU
VANUATU
TUVALU
BURKINAFASO
U.S.
ARGENTINA
PORTUGAL
MONACO
LESOTHO
(FRANCE)
(U.S.)
(N.Z.)
(INDIA)
(INDIA)
(COSTARICA)
(CHILE)
CHAD
claimedby ARGENTINA)
Occupiedby theSOVIETUNIONin1945,administeredby RUSSIA,claimedby JAPAN
*
( J A P A N )
( J A P
A N
)
(U.K.)
VENEZUELAGHANA
SU D AN
RWANDA
BURUNDI
MALAWI
MOZAMBIQUE
ETHIOPIA
SOMALIA
FEDERATED STATESOF MICRONESIA
HAITI
CONGO
REP.OFTHE
OF THECONGO
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC
ANGOLA
SAO TOMEAND PRINCIPE
K A ZA K H STA N
(U.K.)
Taiwan
Gough Island
Bermuda
(St.Helena)
(St.Helena)
FalklandIslands(Islas Malvinas)
Bouvet Island
JohnstonAtoll
KingmanReef (U.S.)
Palmyra Atoll(U.S.)
Greenland
andMiquelon
Islands
WesternSahara
CaicosIslands
MacauBr itishVirginIslands
WakeIsland
Mar ianaPuertoRicoIs land
Guadeloupe(FR.)
GuamAruba
JarvisIsland
(Fr.Poly.)
Christmas Island
CocosAshmoreandCartier Islands F utuna
(Fr .Poly.)
CoralSeaIslands
CaledoniaReunion
(Fr .Poly.)
NorfolkIsland
HeardIslandand
McDonaldIslands
CookIslands
F r e n c h P o l y n e s i a(Fr .Poly.)
PitcairnIslands
CaymanIs.
Navassa
Turksand
Bermuda
Martinique(FR.)
(St.Helena)
(Fr .S.andAnt.Lan ds)
(Fr .S.andAnt. Lands)
(Fr .S.andAnt. Lands)
(Fr .S.andAnt. Lands)
(Keeling) Islands
TromelinIsland
JuandeNovaIsland
Mayotte
Glor iosoIslands
Bassasda India
Europa Island
OceanTerr itory
New
AmericanSamoa
Niue
Wallis and
Tokelau
HowlandIsland
Baker Island
Northern
Midway
Islands
Svalbard
JanMayen
FaroeIslands
Br itishIndian
ClippertonIsland
Hong Kong
SouthGeorgia andtheSouthSandwichIslands
Anguilla (U.K.)
Montserrat
Neth.Antilles
CeutaMelilla
FrenchGuiana
St.Pierre
Gibraltar
S.A.R.
St.Helena(St.Helena)
St.Helena
TRISTANDACUNHA
FrenchSouthernandAntarcticLands
Guerns ey Jers ey
Is leofMan
QUEENELIZABETH
ISLANDS
KURILISLANDS
Wrange lIs land
NEW SIBERIANISLANDS
SEVERNAYA
ZEMLYA
FRANZJOSEFLAND
NOVAYAZEMLYA
EllesmereIsland
BanksIsland
VictoriaBaffinIsland
Island
Rockall
ALEUTIANISLANDS
SakhalinIslandof
Newfoundland
Sardinia
Sic ily
Cre te
Marcus Is land
HainanDao
Socotra
PENEDOS DEKiritimati
SO PEDRO E SO PAULO(Chris tmas Is land)
AnnobonFERNANDO DE NORONHA
DiegoGarc ia
Martin Vaz
Trindade
Is laSan Ambros ioEas ter Is land
LordHoweIs land
leAmsterdam
leSaint-Paul
Tasmania
Campbe llIs land
MacquarieIs land
GALAPAGOSISLANDS
HAWAIIANISLANDS
LES MARQUISES
SOCIETYISLANDS
LES TUBUAI
ARCHIPELDES TUAMOTU
ARCHIPILAGOJUANFERNNDEZ
SOUTH ORKNEY
ISLANDS
PRINCE EDWARD
ISLANDS
LES CROZET
LES KERGUELEN
CHATHAM ISLANDS
BOUNTY ISLANDSSNARES ISLANDS
ANTIPODES ISLANDSAUCKLANDISLANDS
KERMADECISLANDS
ISLANDS
SPRATLY
NICOBAR
PARACEL
ISLANDS
ISLANDS
ISLANDS
AZORES
CANARY ISLANDS
MADEIRAISLANDS
AZORESSicily /
ISLASREVILLAGIGEDO
ANDAMAN
LAKSHADWEEP
Is ladeMalpe lo
Is lade lCoco
Is laSalay Gmez
ARQUIPLAGO DE
Is laSan Fe lx
N A M
P O - S H O T O
-
-
Okinawa
R Y
U
K Y U
I
S
L
A
N
D
S
BALEARICIS LANDS
Cors ica
Ascension
Dependency orarea of special sovereignty
Capital
Belgrade
Casablanca
Laayoune(El Aain)
Kabul
Algiers
Luanda
Buenos Aires
Yerevan
Canberra
Vienna
Baku
Nassau
Manama
Dhaka
Brussels
Thimphu
L a P a z
Gaborone
Bujumbura
Minsk
Yaound
Ottawa
N'Djamena
Santiago
Bogot
Moroni
Brazzaville
SanJos
Havana
Nicosia
Copenhagen
Quito
Cairo
SanSalvador
Malabo
Tallinn
Helsinki
Paris
Libreville
Banjul
Accra
Tarawa
Athens
Guatemala
Conakry
Bissau
Georgetown
Tegucigalpa
Budapest
Jakarta
Dili
Tehran
Baghdad
Dublin
Rome
Yamoussoukro
Kingston
Tokyo
Amman
Nairobi
Bishkek
Vientiane
Beirut
Maseru
Monrovia
Tripoli
Vilnius
Antananarivo
Lilongwe
Male
Bamako
Valletta
NouakchottMexico
Ulaanbaatar
Rabat
Maputo
Kathmandu
Amsterdam
Wellington
Managua
Niamey
Abuja
Oslo
Muscat
Islamabad
Panama
Asuncin
Lima
Manila
Warsaw
Lisbon
Doha
Bucharest
Moscow
Kigali
Seoul
So Tome
Riyadh
Dakar
Victoria
Freetown
Singapore
Harare
Honiara
Mogadishu
Madrid
Colombo
Paramaribo
Mbabane
Stockholm
Bern
Damascus
Dushanbe
Bangkok
Lom
Tunis
Ankara
AbuDhabi
Kampala
LondonKiev
Ouagadougou
Montevideo
Tashkent
Hanoi
Sarajevo
Kinshasa
Lusaka
Zagreb
Ljubljana
Belmopan
Prince
SantoDomingo
Bratislava
PortMoresby
NewDelhi
Pyongyang
Caracas
Pretoria
PortLouis
Chisinau
BegawanBandar Seri
KualaLumpur
Port-Vila
Noumea
Port-of-Spain
Cayenne
Stanley
Denis
Kuwait
Nuuk(Godthb)
AshgabatWashington,D.C.
Dar es Salaam
Majuro
Apia
Funafuti
Suva
Nuku'alofa
Berlin
Tel Aviv-Yafo
Adelaide
Br isbane
Melbourne
Per th
Sydney
SoPaulo
Calgary
Halifax
Montral
Qubec
Toronto
VancouverWinnipeg
Shenyang
Shanghai
Guayaquil
Alexandr ia
Naples
Sapporo
CiudadJurez
Monterrey
Acapulco
Mr ida
Auckland
Chr istchurch
Colon
Durban
Izmir
New York
Lubumbashi
Abidjan
MaracaiboBarranquilla
Johannesburg
Vladivostok
Lanzhou
rmqi
Chengdu
Crdoba
Punta Arenas
RiodeJaneiro
Anchorage
Honolulu
Nor il'sk
Yakutsk
Tianjin
Wuhan
Irkutsk
Atlanta
Arequipa
Belm
Chicago
Denver
Esfahan
Houston
Istanbul
Lagos
Manaus
PortSudan
Rosar io
Seattle
Salvador
Trujillo
Miami
Mashhad
Samara
Omsk
Volgograd
Guangzhou
Harbin
CapeTown
Jerusalem
Jiddah
Yekater inburg
Novosibirsk
Khabarovsk
Arkhangel'sk
Aswan
Namibe
Sucre
Yellowknife
Churchill
Whitehorse
Darwin
Davao
Taipei
Medan
Nome
Barrow
Perm'Nizhniy
Novgorod
Odesa
Qaraghandy(Karaganda)
Kolkata(Calcutta)
Lhasa
Pyinmana
Mandalay
Karachi
Kunming
HoChi Minh City
Hamburg
Bordeaux
Lyon
Munich
Belfast
Murmansk
St.Petersburg
Donets'k
Marseille
Barcelona
Scale1:35,000,000
standard parallels38Nand 38SRobinsonProjection
YarenDistrict
Kirkuk
Tbilisi
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy
Beijing
Saipan
KororPalikir
LosAngeles
San Francisco
Port-au-
Bangui
Djibouti
Sanaa
Addis
Khartoum
Praia
Skopje
Sofia
Papeete
Adamstown
Recife
Beira
Mecca
Surabaya
AliceSpr ings
Hobart
Saint-
Longyearbyen
Ababa
Asmara
Windhoek
Rangoon
Prague
Kaujuitoq
Iqaluit
(Resolute)
(F robisherBay)
Hyderabad
Ahmadabad
Bangalore
Kanpur
Mumbai(Bombay)
Nanning
Guiyang
Taiyuan
Baotou
Jinan
ZhengzhouQingdao
Changchun
Xi'an
NanchangChangsha
Chongqing
Nanjing
Hangzhou
YokohamaNagoya
Osaka
Fukuoka
Pusan
Bandung
Makassar
Palembang
Lahore
TeresinaNatal
Macei
BeloHor izonte
Cur itiba
Pr toAlegre
Goinia
For taleza
Mendoza
La Plata
San DiegoPhoenix
Dallas
San Antonio
Jacksonville
St.Louis
Minneapolis
Detroit
ColumbusPhiladelphia
Boston
El PasoTijuanaMexicali
Guadalajara
Len
Puebla
Edmonton
Cali
Car tagena
Santa Cruz
Oran
Kano
IbadanOgbomoso
Douala
Omdurman
PortElizabeth
Valencia
Sevilla
Glasgow
Luxembourg
Cologne
Lille
LodzKrakw
MilanTur in
Palermo
Ufa
KrasnoyarskKazan'
Saratov
Rostov
Kharkiv
Voronezh
Anadyr '
Porto-Novo
Aleppo
Al Basrah
Mosul
Tabr iz
ShirazAl Jizah
-
Bursa
Konya Adana
Barnaul
Yaroslavl'
Chelyabinsk
Baltimore
Milwaukee
IndianapolisC leveland
NewOrleans
Cebu
Semarang
Nagpur
LucknowJaipur
--
-
-
- -
Riga
Trshavn
Reykjavk
Manchester
Medelln
SoLus
Braslia
Kashi
Island/ islandgroup
Qaanaaq(Thule)
Magadan
-
Pune
Phnom Penh
Fairbanks
Juneau
Portland
SaltLakeCity
Tiksi
Cherskiy
RivadaviaComodoro
Juba
Aden
Kisangani
Bergen
Iquitos
Cusco
San MigueldeTucumn
Tombouctou
ChiangMai
Quetta
Banghazi-
Berbera
Mombasa
Dodoma
Matamoros
Oaxaca
Mazatln
Veracruz
Antofagasta
Concepcin
Puer toMontt
Pontianak
Hue
Happy Valley-GooseBay
Baha Blanca
Marrakech
Cancn
Bilbao
Cairns
L'viv
Chennai(Madras)
Boundary representation isnotnecessar ily author itative.
ALEUTIA
NISLA
NDS
Mata-UtuPago Pago
WalvisBay
Atyrau(Atyrau)
Independentstate
Tirana
Almaty
Kandahar
Political Map of the World, April 2006
Hagta
Astana
-
-
803242AI(R00349) 4-06
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
14/57
vFunc6onallimita6onasauniversalhumanexperience
vEqualizedmentalandphysicalreasonsforlimita6onsvDefineddisabilityasacontextualvariable.Func6onallimita6onbecomesdisablingbasedupontheintersec6onwithenvironments:
PhysicalenvironmentCommunica3onenvironmentInforma3onenvironment
PolicyenvironmentsSocialenvironments
ICF
Int. Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health (01)
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
15/57
AmericanIns6tuteofArchitects(AIA)
CommiHeeontheEnvironment
Sustainabilityenvisionstheenduring
prosperityofalllivingthings.
Sustainabledesignseekstocreate
communi3es,buildings,andproductsthatcontributetothisvision.
Defini3onofSustainableDesign
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
16/57
Overlapofvalues/concepts
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
17/57
Universal Design
Clark Manus, FAIACEO of Heller Manus Architects
87th President of TheAmerican Institute of Architects
Build Boston
November 17, 2011
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
18/57
Master Planning
Entertainment
Commercial Residential
Civic Hotel Retail
Transportation Academic/Research
Sustainability
HM InternationalRenovation
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
19/57
Universal Design
Definition: The design of environments and productsto be usable by all, to the greatest extent possible,
without the need for adaptation or specialized design.
Universal design is equitable and inclusive, avoidingsegregation or stigmatization
More than code-mandated analysisChallenges in everyones lifetime
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
20/57
Reactive
vs.Proactive
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
21/57
Historic vs. New
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
22/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
23/57
Tab on ramp for SF supervisors'chamber adding upAugust 29, 2011 | Chronicle
What costs more: a home in San Francisco's Sunset District, or
a wheelchair ramp in the Board of Supervisors' chambers?
If you picked the house, you're wrong.
By the time the final tab comes in, the cost of designing andinstalling a ramp to the president's chair at the Board of
Supervisors - a project now under way - is expected to top out at$699,413. That is about $50,000 more than the median cost of ahome in the Sunset.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
24/57
Public
vs.Private Visibility
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
25/57
Early Learning on
Sensitivity
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
26/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
27/57
A child tests a toilet for convenienceand usability at the Universal DesignResearch Centre
Researchers in Totos Universal
Design Research Center learnfirsthand the difficulty an older batherhas getting out of the tub.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
28/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
29/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
30/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
31/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
32/57
The agingpopulation calls
for a commitmentto universaldesign tomaintain value.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
33/57
The oldest members of the Baby Boomgeneration are just hitting 65. That
means a much larger percentage thanever before of the US population aresoon-to-be seniors.
The following infographics are from
allassistedlivinghomes.com
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
34/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
35/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
36/57
Oregon Tests iPads as Aid to Disabled VotersThe New York Times | November 16, 2011
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
37/57
Collaborations
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
38/57
Source: http://journal.aarpinternational.org/explore-by-topic/infographics/universal-design
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
39/57
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
40/57
Next Step
Educate governmentofficials, policy makers,and the public
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
41/57
Universal Design is
Good Design.
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
42/57
Thank you!
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
43/57
RichardSimmons
Ge#ngthemessageacrossProfessorRichardSimmonsSchoolofArchitectureandConstruc3on
UniversityofGreenwich,London,UK;
formerlyCEOofCABE
Ins3tuteforHumanCenteredDesignatBuildBoston:B61-Whychoose
universaldesignasadesignphilosophy?
17November2011
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
44/57
RichardSimmons
Which of CABEs strategiesworked best to changepractice?
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
45/57
RichardSimmons
CABEs approach buildings and
places are always for everyone
Leadership Influence The right skills Public
engagement
Creating orimproving themarket
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
46/57
RichardSimmonsLeadership
At CABE we arecommitted to integrating
equality and inclusion into
all our activities. I want to
set our sights beyond ourlegal obligations. I want us
to lead the field in
promoting equality in the
design, management andmaintenance of the built
environment. Richard Simmons, CEO, CABE CABE Equality Scheme and Action Plan,
2008
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
47/57
RichardSimmonsWhat did CABE do?
Designreview Enablingadvice-architecture,
planning,urbandesignand
publicspace
Campaigns Research/publica3ons/web PolicyadvicetoGovernment Educa3onandskills Grants
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
48/57
RichardSimmons
The impact of CABEs approaches
to improving design practice
0
20
40
60
80
100Design Review
Architecture &Planning Enabling
Public SpaceEnabling
Education
Professional SkillsTraining
Urban DesignSummer School
Research/Publications
Web Resources
Climate ChangeFestival
Sea Change GrantsCustomers
repor3ngposi3ve
behaviourchange
thankstoCABE
Customers
repor3ngCABE
ac3vityas"useful"
CABECustomerSurvey2009
andprogrammeevalua3ons
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
49/57
RichardSimmons
From best practice to nextpractice
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
50/57
RichardSimmons
Good/Best v Next Practice: innovatingto escape the status quo
Good/best practiceasks: what is
working?
Next practice asks:what could work more powerfully?
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
51/57
RichardSimmonsWhat is meant by Next Practice?
Next Practice, according to the UK Innovation Unit: is aware of conventional good practice, its strengths and limitations; and
explicitly sets out to take it to a new level or disrupt, profoundly evolve, orrevolutionise it
by implication, is conducted by very able, informed practitioners is located in an environment-scanning, needs-aware, futures-informed
ethos, seeking out alternative expert perspectives
is directed at serious, contemporary problems is not (yet) officially sanctioned or endorsed; and therefore does entail some
risk
is not a linear process is trialled in the field, then transferred to the mainstream
Sound like good, innovative design to you? It does to me!
www.innova3onunit.org
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
52/57
RichardSimmonsBest practice
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
53/57
RichardSimmonsNext practice
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
54/57
RichardSimmons
Bluewater shopping mall - next
commercial practice
Bluewater was built toexacting standards tomeet the needs of ourguests with disabilities,
and the services weprovide on a day-to-day basis aim toensure that all our
visitors are able toenjoy a great day outwith us
Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, UK:Eric Kuhne & Benoy Architects forLend Lease
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
55/57
RichardSimmons
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
56/57
RichardSimmons
Sight Line - next practice for street
design http://tinyurl.com/c9onss4
-
8/3/2019 Why Choose Universal Design as a Design Philosophy
57/57
RichardSimmons
Thank you
www.cabe.org.uk
(web site archived at the UK National Archives)