why global warming is a hoax

8/7/2019 Why Global Warming is a hoax

1/11

Why global warming is a hoax?

In a 2003 speech to San Franciscos Commonwealth Club, popular science novelist

Michael Crichton described the religion of environmentalism, predecessor to the Church

of Global Warming:

Today, one of the most powerful religions in the Western World is environmentalism,

Crichton disclosed. Environmentalism seems to be the religion of choice for urban

atheists. Theres an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, theres

a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge,

and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all. We are all energy

sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability.

Most environmentalists have no technical or scientific credentials whatsoever. What they

have are major news outlets ready and willing to publicize their every utterance

regardless of whether or not they are backed up by scientific proof. Atmospheric science

requires highly technical knowledge and skills, not possessed by the vast majority of the

so-called environmentalists, who yet feel qualified to demand that human activity

subjugate itself to the whims of their new deity, Mother Nature.

Environmentalists claim that the Earths atmosphere is getting hotter. They claim that the

polar icecaps and glaciers will melt and sea levels will rise over two hundred feet,

flooding most coastal cities. They claim that many areas of the Earth will turn into

deserts. They make all these claims but cannot substantiate them with real scientific

evidence. Parts of the polar icecap and glaciers are melting but other areas of the polar

icecaps and glaciers are thickening. The environmentalists base their proof of the

existence of global warming on the melting areas but are strangely silent, even militant to

the point of violence, if anyone mentions the areas that are thickening, and those

thickening areas are many.


2/11

Some myths

MYTH 1: Planet earth is currently undergoing global warming.

FACT: Accurate and representative temperature measurements from satellites and

balloons show that the planet has cooled significantly in the last two or three years, losing

in only 18 months 15% of the claimed warming which took over 100 years to appear

that warming was only one degree Fahrenheit (half of one degree Celsius) anyway, and

part of this is a systematic error from ground station readings which are inflated due to

the urban heat island effect i.e. local heat retention due to urban sprawl, not global

warmingand it is these, false high ground readings which are then programmed into

the disreputable climate models, which live up to the GIGO acronym garbage in,

garbage out.

MYTH 2: Even slight temperature rises are disastrous, ice caps will melt, and people will

die.

FACT: James OBrien, emeritus professor at Florida State University who studies

climate variability and the oceans, thinks not. When the Arctic Ocean ice melts, it never

raises sea level because floating ice is floating ice, because its displacing water, he

points out.

When the ice melts, sea level actually goes down. I call it a fourth-grade science

experiment: Take a glass, put some ice in it, put water in it, and mark level where water

is. . . . After the ice melts, the sea level didnt go up in your glass of water. Its called the

Archimedes principle.

The glaciers on Kilimanjaro and other mountains in the area are shrinking due to a

change in local sublimination. In 1880 the climate in the area changed from a very humid

to a very dry climate resulting in less clouds and more direct sunlight. (Sublimation of an

element or compound is a transition from the solid to gas phase with no intermediateliquid stage). Recently Kilimanjaro has gained substantial ice covering in last two years.


3/11

MYTH 3: Carbon Dioxide levels in our atmosphere at the moment are unprecedented

(high).

FACT: Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, currently only 350 parts per million have

been over 18 times higher in the past at a time when cars, factories and power stations did

not exist levels rise and fall without mankinds help.(See Harper study above

mentioned)

MYTH 4: Mankind is pumping out pollutant carbon dioxide at a prodigious rate.

FACT: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant, but a naturally occurring atmospheric

substance.

CO2 makes up .054% of the atmosphere.

Volcanoes produce far more CO2 than humans.

Animals produce more CO2 than volcanoes.Decaying vegetation produces more CO2 than animals (remember Gores explanation for

why the red line is so wavy?; He left out half the explanation.)

96.5% of all carbon dioxide emissions are from natural sources, mankind is responsible

for only 3.5%, with 0.6% coming from fuel to move vehicles, and about 1% from fuel to

heat buildings. Yet vehicle fuel (petrol) is taxed at 300% while fuel to heat buildings is

taxed at 5% even though buildings emit nearly twice as much carbon dioxide!

Then there is the eruption of volcanoes, such as Mt. St. Helens, ejecting dust and ash into

the Earths atmosphere. The amount of dust and ash in the atmosphere varies the amount

of energy that can cause heating or cooling of the Earths atmosphere. Volcanoes also

eject the kind of compounds that environmentalists call greenhouse gases. A single

eruption the size of the Mt. St. Helens (ex.1980 eruption) released more of these gases,

dust and ash into the atmosphere than all such emissions by human activity since the

beginning of recorded human history. And there are numerous volcanic eruptions yearly.

The oceans are also a major source of greenhouse gases, as are trees. Trees and other

vegetation take in carbon dioxide and give off other gases such as methane, a major

greenhouse gas, and a host of other compounds, many of which are also greenhousegases. Decaying vegetation also gives off methane gas. Studies of smog in the Los

Angeles basin indicate that over 90% of the smog is generated by the vegetation in the

area. To aid in perpetuating the hoax, however, environmentalists, aided by major news

media outlets, censored and suppressed this study.


4/11

MYTH 5: Carbon dioxide changes in the atmosphere cause temperature changes on the

earth

FACT: A report in the journal Science in January of this year showed using

information from ice cores with high time resolution that since the last ice age, every time

when the temperature and carbon dioxide levels have shifted, the carbon dioxide change

happened AFTER the temperature change, so that man-made global warming theory has

put effect before cause this shows that reducing carbon dioxide emissions is a futile

King Canute exercise! Whats more, both water vapor and methane are far more powerful

greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide but they are ignored.

MYTH 6: Reducing car use will cut carbon dioxide levels and save the planet.

FACT: The planet does not need saving, but taking this on anyway, removing every carfrom every road in every country overnight would NOT produce any change in the

carbon dioxide level of the atmosphere, as can be seen using the numbers from Fact 4,

and in any case it is pointless trying to alter climate by changing carbon dioxide levels as

the cause and effect is the other way round it is changes in the activity of the Sun that

cause temperature changes on earth, with any temperature rise causing carbon dioxide to

de-gas from the oceans.

MYTH 7: The recent wet weather and flooding was caused by mankind through global

warming

FACT: Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issue reports that say global warming is real

and that we must do something now.

Scientists draft reports for the IPCC, but the IPCC are bureaucrats appointed by

governments, in fact many scientists who contribute to the reports disagree with the

spin that the IPCC and media put on their findings.

The latest report suggests that the next 100 years might see a temperature change of 6

Celsius yet a Lead Author for the IPCC (Dr John Christy UAH/NASA) has pointed out

that the scenarios with the fastest warming rates were added to the report at a late stage,

at the request of a few governments in other words the scientists were told what to do

by politicians.


5/11

MYTH 8: There are only a tiny handful of maverick scientists who dispute that man-

made global warming theory is true.

FACT: There are nearly 18,000 signatures from scientists worldwide on a petition called

The Oregon Petition which says that there is no evidence for man-made global warming

theory nor for any impact from mankinds activities on climate.

Many scientists believe that the Kyoto agreement is a total waste of time and one of the

biggest political scams ever perpetrated on the public as H L Mencken said the

fundamental aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence

clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of

them imaginary the desire to save the world usually fronts a desire to rule it.

MYTH 9: Global warming cause flood and famine.

FACT: Some months back I went through a news report claiming floods and famines are

result of the global warming. He had clearly not remembered his class 10 th concept of the

El Nio Southern Oscillation, a weather cycle that is often referred to as the most

powerful after the changes of the seasons.

When strong El Nios have been active (warm surface water to the east of the Pacific),

the monsoon in India is often weak, leading to crop failures and, a couple of centuries

ago, famines that killed millions. At the other extreme (warm water to the west), La

Nias tend to cause stronger monsoons, with accompanying floods. El Nios have

predominated for the past some years, but as La Nia conditions would soon b stronger

When strong El Nios have been active (warm surface water to the east of the Pacific),

the monsoon in India is often weak, leading to crop failures and, a couple of centuries

ago, famines that killed millions. At the other extreme (warm water to the west), La

Nias tend to cause stronger monsoons, with accompanying floods. El Nios have

predominated for the last couple of years, but as La Nia conditions would build up in the

Pacific we should expect a strong monsoon soon. There is no evidence of a connection

with global warming whatsoever.

That journalist was simply jumping on an uninformed bandwagon, which is a perfect

example of how this myth of global warming is maintained and spread.

Pacific since about May, we should have expected a strong monsoon with flooding last

year. There is no evidence of a connection with global warming whatsoever.

That journalist was simply jumping on an uninformed bandwagon, which is a perfect

example of how this myth of global warming is maintained and spread.


6/11

Myth 10: solar activity cant be reason for ups and downs in temperature.

Fact: The current state of the science as put about by the media and politicians is out of

date. A connection between solar activity and climate change has been evident for at least

200 years.

But the measured changes in the heat output from the Sun werent enough to explain the

changes in temperature on Earth. So, when, after three decades of cooling (1940-1970)

the climate started warming up again in the 1970s, it was assumed that this might be due

to the carbon dioxide (CO2) gas that had been building up; it was known that CO2 was a

greenhouse gas, and as the solar influence was not understood, this was a reasonable

assumption.

But the connection is not good. There are many sets of figures describing both,

temperature and solar activity, but taking some of the best data available over the past

century, the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature has been about 0.2 (below0.3 is considered a weak correlation). The correlation between solar activity and

temperature is about 0.8, and values above 0.7 are usually considered strong. In addition,

mechanisms have now been described that explain the amplification effect of solar

radiation. Too complex to describe here, but the mix involves the solar magnetic field,

cosmic rays and the Earths cloud cover, not just the radiant heat from the Sun. The

numbers add up well; with this theory now explaining the temperature changes we have

been seeing.

Myth11: The most absurd myth: Mr. Gore has no ulterior motive.

FACT: There are huge dollars to be made from global warming alarmism. However,

conceivably no one is better positioned to financially benefit from this scam than Dr.

Global Warming himself, former Vice President Al Gore, by developing a Green money-

making machine capable of eventually generating billions of dollars for investors. A fact

media will surely not share any time soon. Gore's company, GIM was specifically

established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to

combating global warming.

According to their own documents, GIM intends to invest in, or buy companies poised to

cash in on Global Warming concerns.

Gore helped found Generation Investment Management, through which he and others pay

for offsets. The firm invests the money in solar, wind and other projects that reduce

energy consumption around the globe


7/11

Gore is chairman of the firm and, presumably, draws an income or will make money as

its investments prosper. In other words, he buys his carbon offsets from himself,

through a transaction designed to boost his own investments and return a profit to him.

To be blunt, Gore doesnt buy carbon offsets through Generation Investment

Management hebuys stocks.

THINK: An individual in Europe or USA discovers that he commits a sin by driving his

SUV. He buys carbon offset or stock from any green technology company.

If the present rate of sensitivity increases further, then the day is not far off when AL

Gore would address someone walking on the road hey man you are producing 1 kg of

CO2 everyday. You need to have ablution. Buy share of my company and feel better.

Similarly a multi national company recognizes it has the new avenue of boasting its CSRby investing in green technology.

TRIVIA: Dr. Global Warming travels the world in his private jet all the time telling us

its okay because hes buying carbon offsets. Hes actually purchasing these investments

from himself.

According to Nashville Electric Service records, Gores palatial home and pool house use

more than twenty times the national average of kilowatt-hours (Tapper, 2007). So what

do you do when your leader, who preaches that the masses should reduce their deadlyemissions, is found with his pants down consuming enough energy to power a third world

country? Well, thats when fanaticism comes in handy.

Mr. Gore what about per capita emission????

Furthermore, and maybe more important, Gore stands to benefit financially in a

potentially huge way if more and more people buy into this junk science.

Isnt that special?

When you add it all up, this is a flimflam of epic proportions:


8/11

First, Gore sets up a company that will invest in other companies that will benefit

from global warming alarmism

Second, Gore gets some Hollywood types to fund and produce a movie designed

to scare the c-c-carbon out of the population

Third, Gore travels the world promoting this movie, while pushing the view that a

cataclysm is imminent if the world doesnt immediately act

Fourth, an adoring media falls for the con hook, line, and sinker. Rather than

debunking the flaws in the theories, the media promote every word of it while

advancing the concept that Gores views represent those of an overwhelming majority

of scientists

Fifth, scared governments and citizens across the globe invest in alternative

energy programs driving up the shares of companies Gores group has already

invested in

Sixth, Gore and his cronies make billions as they laugh all the way to the bank at

the stupidity of their fellow citizens.

Fascinating! Mind-boggling!!

DR. Harper Study

In his analysis of CO2 as a factor in climate change, Dr. Harper affirmed that CO2 is nota

cause for alarm, as it is neither a pollutant nor a poison. Indeed, Harper argued that

CO2 limitations, such as the 450 ppm (parts per million) standard recommended by the

IPCC to stabilize CO2 in the atmosphere, will actually damage the environment.

According to Dr. Harper, the current warming period (which actually ended 10 years ago)

began in 1800 following the close of the little ice age (1300-1650 AD), Between 13 th

century to 17 century there was a temporary ice age .This fact can be corroborated fromThames and Amazon freezing in mid 15th century and also napoleon retreat from Russia

due to stormy and cold weather.

This was precededby a Medieval Warm Period (800-1300 AD). Harper noted that the

temporary ice age and the Medieval Warm Period were curiously omitted from the IPCC

report and that the Medieval Warm Period was as warm or warmer than today. Clearly at


9/11

that point in time, global warming had nothing to do with the burning of fossils fuels.

Also, Dr. Harper explained that several warnings have existed over the last 10,000 years

since the last ice age, thus confirming that climate change has occurred multiple times

without mankinds actions.

Evidence: Global temperatures stopped rising after 1998 and have plummeted in the last

two years by more than 0.5 degrees Celsius. The 2007-08 temperature drops was not

predicted by global climate models. Los Vegas witnessed unprecedented snowfall in

2007 and 08.Arcatic ice caps reclaimed substantially too.

Furthermore, plants and our primitive ancestors evolved when atmospheric CO2 was 1000

ppm. This compares to our current level of 380 ppm.

Dr. Harper reported that higher levels of CO2 benefit the environment because they result

in higher crop yield and more drought-tolerant plants. He cited a modern day example:

greenhouse operations that are typically maintained at 1000 ppm. In truth, Harper said weare actually in a CO2 famine as most of the earths CO2

levels throughout the planets

history have been at least 1000 ppm or higher. At these points in time, the oceans were

fine, plants grew, and animals grew fine. So its baffling to me that were so frightened of

getting nowhere close to where we started, he said.

Dr. Harper also cited examinations of ice cores from Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets

as further evidence of his claims. From that data, past temperatures and concentrations of

CO2 in the atmosphere can be determined. (Antarctic ice core samples show that the rise

in carbon dioxide levels lags behind temperature rise by 800 years therefore cannot be the

cause of it.)The findings indicate that firsttemperatures rose and about 800 years later,CO2 levels rose from the CO2 released from warmer oceans. This finding is in direct

contradiction to the beliefs of global warming advocates who believe that higher levels of

CO2 cause warmer temperatures.

Dr. Harper maintains that the current climate crisis is a political creation that does not

enjoy consensus but has the backing of the media, influential politicians, certain scientific

societies and well-funded non-profit organizations. He cautions that climate warming

dogma, absent critical analysis and the presentation of contrary data, is being taught in

our schools along with the widespread viewing of the seriously flawed film The

Inconvenient Truth.

Not a surprise, Dr. Harper, was ironically fired by Al Gore.

Farce of Kyoto protocol and international leaders

Efforts to quickly reduce human greenhouse gas emissions would be costly and would

not stop Earths climate from changing. Reducing U.S. carbon dioxide emissions to 7


10/11

percent below 1990s levels by the year 2012the target set by the Kyoto Protocolwould

require higher energy taxes and regulations causing the nation to lose 2.4 million jobs and

$300 billion in annual economic output. Average household income nationwide would

fall by $2,700, and state tax revenues would decline by $93.1 billion due to less taxable

earned income and sales, and lower property values. Full implementation of the Kyoto

Protocol by all participating nations would reduce global temperature in the year 2100 by

a mere 0.14 degrees Celsius (as Kyoto protocol itself assert). In truth it would have

almost 0.00 affect on temperature.

Politicians have been responding to the failure of the Kyoto Protocol by showing they are

doing something. They have adopted pointless and expensive impositions on energy

industries, energy supplies and transportation. And the public is paying the large costs of

this in their energy bills.

The Copenhagen Conference will provide a decision because it has to, but that decision

will have no more effect than the Kyoto Protocol. And this will put more pressure on thepoliticians to be seen to be doing something with further cost and harm to peoples and

to industry.

There is as yet no clear evidence that the additional climate change is happening. But

environmental groups are pressing the politicians to act before it is too late.

And politicians are responding because of the fear of dire consequences from the

additional climate change

Get rid of all of these rotten politicians (presumably, Republicans in Washington),

who are nothing more than corporate toadies.

The hallmark of science is the testing of a plausible hypothesis good that is then

either supported or rejected by the evidence.

Save forest, save endangered species, save electricity forget global

warming.

Let Common sense and good science rule the day.

REFERENCES:


11/11

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/questions/question/2008/

http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/action-on-global-warming-is-suicide.html

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/temperate-facts/madness-of-king-

gore/deconstructing-the-truth?start=1

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/the-global-warming-hoax

http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/harper_conservatives/pdf/lettertoharper2.pdf

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/090307warminghoax.htm

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/17/stopping-climate-change/

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/392319/global_warming_is_not_real_whats_be

hind.html

http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/antarctic-ice-is-growing.html

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tacti

cs.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tacti

cs.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/12/15/scientists-denounce-ap-

hysterical-global-warming-article

http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-

moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sampling_of_Scientific_Reality_Checks_on_Mount_Kili

manjaro.pdf

http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-

moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/04/post_3.html

http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Columns/Its-The-Sun-Stupid.html
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/questions/question/2008/http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/action-on-global-warming-is-suicide.htmlhttp://www.climatechangefraud.com/temperate-facts/madness-of-king-gore/deconstructing-the-truth?start=1http://www.climatechangefraud.com/temperate-facts/madness-of-king-gore/deconstructing-the-truth?start=1http://www.climatechangefraud.com/the-global-warming-hoaxhttp://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/background/harper_conservatives/pdf/lettertoharper2.pdfhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/090307warminghoax.htmhttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/17/stopping-climate-change/http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/392319/global_warming_is_not_real_whats_behind.htmlhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/392319/global_warming_is_not_real_whats_behind.htmlhttp://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/antarctic-ice-is-growing.htmlhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/12/15/scientists-denounce-ap-hysterical-global-warming-articlehttp://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/12/15/scientists-denounce-ap-hysterical-global-warming-articlehttp://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sampling_of_Scientific_Reality_Checks_on_Mount_Kilimanjaro.pdfhttp://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sampling_of_Scientific_Reality_Checks_on_Mount_Kilimanjaro.pdfhttp://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/04/post_3.htmlhttp://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Columns/Its-The-Sun-Stupid.htmlhttp://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/questions/question/2008/http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/action-on-global-warming-is-suicide.htmlhttp://www.climatechangefraud.com/temperate-facts/madness-of-king-gore/deconstructing-the-truth?start=1http://www.climatechangefraud.com/temperate-facts/madness-of-king-gore/deconstructing-the-truth?start=1http://www.climatechangefraud.com/the-global-warming-hoaxhttp://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.htmlhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/background/harper_conservatives/pdf/lettertoharper2.pdfhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/090307warminghoax.htmhttp://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/08/17/stopping-climate-change/http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/392319/global_warming_is_not_real_whats_behind.htmlhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/392319/global_warming_is_not_real_whats_behind.htmlhttp://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/02/antarctic-ice-is-growing.htmlhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2195185/global_warming_facts_or_scare_tactics.html?singlepage=true&obref=obinsite&cat=9http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/12/15/scientists-denounce-ap-hysterical-global-warming-articlehttp://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/12/15/scientists-denounce-ap-hysterical-global-warming-articlehttp://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sampling_of_Scientific_Reality_Checks_on_Mount_Kilimanjaro.pdfhttp://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sampling_of_Scientific_Reality_Checks_on_Mount_Kilimanjaro.pdfhttp://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/al-gore-vs-the-aristotelian-method-or-the-moral-irrationality-of-climate-scaremongering/http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/2007/04/post_3.htmlhttp://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Columns/Its-The-Sun-Stupid.html

why global warming is a hoax

Documents