why manage risk?
DESCRIPTION
InfoRM is a collaboration of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Team for Preparedness and Resilience and the European Commission. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
InfoRM is a collaboration of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Task Team for Preparedness and Resilience and the European Commission.
'Countries at risk from humanitarian emergencies that could overwhelm current national response capacity, and therefore lead to a need for international assistance'
Why manage risk?
InfoRM Principles
Global coverageOpen sourceContinuousTransparent
Flexible
Methodology
Methodology
Theoretical framework
Component and indicator
selection
Pre-processing
Building the index
Results – Global list
COUNTRY Nat
ural
Hum
an
HA
ZAR
D
Deve
lopm
ent &
De
priva
tion
Ineq
ualit
y
Aid
Depe
nden
cy
Soci
o-Ec
onom
ic
Vuln
erab
ility
Upro
oted
peo
ple
Hea
lth C
ondi
tions
Chi
ldre
n U
5
Rec
ent S
hock
s
Food
Sec
urity
Othe
r Vul
nera
ble
Grou
ps
Vuln
erab
le G
roup
s
VULN
ERA
BIL
ITY
DRR
Gove
rnan
ce
Inst
itutio
nal
Com
mun
icat
ion
Phys
ical
in
frast
ruct
ure
Acce
ss to
hea
lth
care
Infr
astr
uctu
re
CO
PIN
G C
APA
CIT
Y
RIS
K
Afghanistan 6.3 9.9 8.7 8.9 5.1 9.9 8.2 8.0 2.2 7.4 1.6 x 4.3 6.5 7.4 7.3 8.6 7.9 8.0 8.5 9.2 8.5 8.2 8.1Albania 5.7 2.2 4.2 1.7 2.9 3.2 2.4 0.0 0.4 1.3 3.8 3.2 2.3 1.2 1.8 x 6.2 6.2 3.3 2.5 5.2 3.7 5.1 3.4Algeria 2.8 7.0 5.3 3.7 5.2 0.2 3.2 5.3 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.8 3.3 3.3 3.5 6.3 4.9 4.7 4.5 5.6 4.9 4.9 4.4Angola 3.2 5.2 4.3 6.8 4.4 0.3 4.6 4.7 7.0 6.7 5.2 7.8 6.8 5.8 5.2 5.3 7.5 6.4 6.9 7.9 6.5 7.1 6.7 5.3Antigua and Barbuda 5.8 1.7 4.0 2.9 x 4.4 3.4 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 4.2 1.4 0.7 2.2 5.4 4.0 4.7 0.6 0.7 3.6 1.6 3.3 3.1Argentina 3.6 2.7 3.2 1.2 5.0 0.1 1.9 1.8 0.5 0.8 0.0 2.1 0.9 1.3 1.6 4.0 6.0 5.0 2.0 3.4 3.3 2.9 4.0 2.7Armenia 4.4 4.2 4.3 1.9 3.1 3.6 2.6 4.0 0.6 1.2 2.2 3.8 2.0 3.1 2.8 7.5 5.9 6.7 3.7 3.2 4.2 3.7 5.4 4.0Australia 5.3 1.1 3.5 0.2 1.5 0.0 0.5 4.8 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.1 0.5 2.9 1.8 2.4 1.6 2.0 3.3 3.1 0.6 2.3 2.2 2.4Austria 2.4 0.9 1.7 0.8 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.5 x 2.2 2.2 1.9 0.4 2.0 1.4 1.8 1.1Azerbaijan 3.5 5.0 4.3 2.0 3.2 0.6 2.0 9.1 0.8 2.3 0.1 3.7 1.8 6.8 4.8 x 6.9 6.9 3.1 4.0 6.1 4.4 5.8 4.9Bahamas 3.2 4.2 3.7 2.4 4.2 0.0 2.3 0.9 2.9 1.3 0.0 2.4 1.7 1.3 1.8 x 2.9 2.9 4.7 3.2 2.3 3.4 3.1 2.8Bahrain 0.2 5.4 3.2 2.4 3.4 0.0 2.0 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.0 x 0.4 0.8 1.4 3.8 4.5 4.1 1.2 0.0 4.5 1.9 3.1 2.4Bangladesh 9.0 5.7 7.7 5.9 4.3 0.6 4.2 5.7 2.8 6.2 2.9 4.1 4.1 5.0 4.6 3.2 7.0 5.1 7.3 5.8 6.6 6.6 5.9 5.9Barbados 2.9 2.1 2.5 1.9 4.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.0 2.0 1.1 0.6 1.4 2.8 2.3 2.5 3.2 0.0 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.1Belarus 1.5 2.7 2.1 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.2 3.1 1.3 1.1 0.9 3.0 7.2 5.1 3.3 2.7 2.8 2.9 4.1 2.0Belgium 1.6 1.4 1.5 0.8 1.6 0.0 0.8 4.2 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.3 2.4 1.7 x 2.2 2.2 3.0 0.0 0.4 1.1 1.7 1.6Belize 4.4 4.8 4.6 2.3 5.8 2.3 3.2 0.9 1.8 1.2 0.0 2.0 1.3 1.1 2.2 x 5.9 5.9 7.6 3.5 5.8 5.6 5.8 3.9Benin 3.9 3.1 3.5 7.4 5.8 4.5 6.3 2.5 4.6 5.7 0.7 3.8 3.9 3.2 5.0 x 6.2 6.2 8.1 7.8 8.9 8.3 7.4 5.0Bhutan 4.7 1.2 3.1 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.1 0.0 1.6 3.1 0.7 x 1.9 1.0 3.3 6.4 3.8 5.1 7.3 5.2 6.7 6.4 5.8 3.9
Results – Country profile
Results – Trends
Results – Trends
Results – National models
Analysis – vs HDI
Source: Human Development Report (UNDP)
Analysis – Humanitarian appeals
Source: OCHA World Humanitarian Data and Trends 2013
Analysis – DRR funding
Source: Kellet and Caravani 2013 (ODI/GFDRR)
Using InfoRMJust some examples of how organisations using
InfoRM...
Website: inform.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Contact us: [email protected]