will j. gordillo, district director president of florida …casecec.org/documents/2011_wi/will...

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

1

� Will J. Gordillo, District DirectorWill J. Gordillo, District DirectorWill J. Gordillo, District DirectorWill J. Gordillo, District Director

� MDCPS Division of Special Education, MDCPS Division of Special Education, MDCPS Division of Special Education, MDCPS Division of Special Education, President of Florida CASEPresident of Florida CASEPresident of Florida CASEPresident of Florida CASE

� All StudentsAll StudentsAll StudentsAll Students

� All TeachersAll TeachersAll TeachersAll Teachers

� All PrincipalsAll PrincipalsAll PrincipalsAll Principals

� All Administratorsll Administratorsll Administratorsll Administrators

� All SchoolsAll SchoolsAll SchoolsAll Schools

� Gen ED, SPED, ELL, Alt. Ed, CORE Gen ED, SPED, ELL, Alt. Ed, CORE Gen ED, SPED, ELL, Alt. Ed, CORE Gen ED, SPED, ELL, Alt. Ed, CORE ContentContentContentContent

� Student Growth and Gains Matter!Student Growth and Gains Matter!Student Growth and Gains Matter!Student Growth and Gains Matter!

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

2

� Core Effective Core Effective Core Effective Core Effective PracticesPracticesPracticesPractices---- Florida Florida Florida Florida Educator Effective Educator Effective Educator Effective Educator Effective PracticesPracticesPracticesPractices

� Instructional Performance Evaluation Instructional Performance Evaluation Instructional Performance Evaluation Instructional Performance Evaluation system for teachers (IPEGS) meets the system for teachers (IPEGS) meets the system for teachers (IPEGS) meets the system for teachers (IPEGS) meets the requirementsrequirementsrequirementsrequirements

� It uses a 4 rating scale which include: It uses a 4 rating scale which include: It uses a 4 rating scale which include: It uses a 4 rating scale which include: Exemplary, Proficient, Exemplary, Proficient, Exemplary, Proficient, Exemplary, Proficient, Developing/Needs Improvement and Developing/Needs Improvement and Developing/Needs Improvement and Developing/Needs Improvement and UnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnsatisfactory

� Evaluation System for Managerial Evaluation System for Managerial Evaluation System for Managerial Evaluation System for Managerial Exempt Performance for School Site Exempt Performance for School Site Exempt Performance for School Site Exempt Performance for School Site Principals that also uses a $ rating Principals that also uses a $ rating Principals that also uses a $ rating Principals that also uses a $ rating scalescalescalescale

� Scores based on competencies, key Scores based on competencies, key Scores based on competencies, key Scores based on competencies, key performance targets and professional performance targets and professional performance targets and professional performance targets and professional growthgrowthgrowthgrowth

� MDCPS has had MDCPS has had MDCPS has had MDCPS has had previous experience previous experience previous experience previous experience with performance with performance with performance with performance pay and developed pay and developed pay and developed pay and developed metrics for metrics for metrics for metrics for performance pay performance pay performance pay performance pay incentives based on incentives based on incentives based on incentives based on scorecards for scorecards for scorecards for scorecards for school site school site school site school site administratorsadministratorsadministratorsadministrators

� Improve teacher and principal evaluation systems

� Design and conduct Design and conduct Design and conduct Design and conduct teacher and principal teacher and principal teacher and principal teacher and principal evaluation systems evaluation systems evaluation systems evaluation systems that meet the that meet the that meet the that meet the requirements of the requirements of the requirements of the requirements of the lawlawlawlaw

� Teacher and principal appraisal system that reflects the inclusion of an implementation process for each of the content and design requirements listed ins. 1012.34,F.S.

� Timetable for implementing the evaluation systems

� Annually report evaluation results for teachers and principals through the regular student and staff survey and submit annually.

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

3

� Design/modify IPEGS upon Design/modify IPEGS upon Design/modify IPEGS upon Design/modify IPEGS upon the state developed growth the state developed growth the state developed growth the state developed growth measure including the measure including the measure including the measure including the determination of a unified determination of a unified determination of a unified determination of a unified comprehensive range of comprehensive range of comprehensive range of comprehensive range of ratingsratingsratingsratings

� Develop and implement Develop and implement Develop and implement Develop and implement additional metric evaluation additional metric evaluation additional metric evaluation additional metric evaluation elements including the elements including the elements including the elements including the implementation of Peer implementation of Peer implementation of Peer implementation of Peer Observation as an Observation as an Observation as an Observation as an additional metric for additional metric for additional metric for additional metric for teachersteachersteachersteachers

� Integrate the updated evaluation system with Integrate the updated evaluation system with Integrate the updated evaluation system with Integrate the updated evaluation system with the appropriate measures for instructional the appropriate measures for instructional the appropriate measures for instructional the appropriate measures for instructional personnel in nonpersonnel in nonpersonnel in nonpersonnel in non----FCAT core courses and FCAT core courses and FCAT core courses and FCAT core courses and grade levels, as well as Student Support grade levels, as well as Student Support grade levels, as well as Student Support grade levels, as well as Student Support PersonnelPersonnelPersonnelPersonnel

� Purchase assorted assessment tools such as Purchase assorted assessment tools such as Purchase assorted assessment tools such as Purchase assorted assessment tools such as KKKK----2 Stanford, etc.2 Stanford, etc.2 Stanford, etc.2 Stanford, etc.

� Develop assessments to integrate with end of Develop assessments to integrate with end of Develop assessments to integrate with end of Develop assessments to integrate with end of course examscourse examscourse examscourse exams

� Purchase and use Alternate Assessment Purchase and use Alternate Assessment Purchase and use Alternate Assessment Purchase and use Alternate Assessment Instructional Materials aligned to support Instructional Materials aligned to support Instructional Materials aligned to support Instructional Materials aligned to support instruction through the Florida Sunshine State instruction through the Florida Sunshine State instruction through the Florida Sunshine State instruction through the Florida Sunshine State Standards Access Points.Standards Access Points.Standards Access Points.Standards Access Points.

� Phase in the student growth model for at least Phase in the student growth model for at least Phase in the student growth model for at least Phase in the student growth model for at least 35% of the evaluation, and student growth or 35% of the evaluation, and student growth or 35% of the evaluation, and student growth or 35% of the evaluation, and student growth or achievement for 15% for teachers in grades achievement for 15% for teachers in grades achievement for 15% for teachers in grades achievement for 15% for teachers in grades and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth measures have been established.measures have been established.measures have been established.measures have been established.

� Increase student growth model for at least 40% Increase student growth model for at least 40% Increase student growth model for at least 40% Increase student growth model for at least 40% of the evaluation, and student growth or of the evaluation, and student growth or of the evaluation, and student growth or of the evaluation, and student growth or achievement for 150 for teachers in grades achievement for 150 for teachers in grades achievement for 150 for teachers in grades achievement for 150 for teachers in grades and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth and subjects for which student growth measures have been established.measures have been established.measures have been established.measures have been established.

� Design and modify and Design and modify and Design and modify and Design and modify and evaluation system for evaluation system for evaluation system for evaluation system for principals that utilizes the principals that utilizes the principals that utilizes the principals that utilizes the state adopted teacherstate adopted teacherstate adopted teacherstate adopted teacher----level level level level student growth measurestudent growth measurestudent growth measurestudent growth measure

� Include a comprehensive Include a comprehensive Include a comprehensive Include a comprehensive range of ratings beyond range of ratings beyond range of ratings beyond range of ratings beyond satisfactory and satisfactory and satisfactory and satisfactory and unsatisfactory based on unsatisfactory based on unsatisfactory based on unsatisfactory based on student achievement and student achievement and student achievement and student achievement and growthgrowthgrowthgrowth

� A portion of this evaluation A portion of this evaluation A portion of this evaluation A portion of this evaluation will account for at least 50% will account for at least 50% will account for at least 50% will account for at least 50% of the principals evaluationof the principals evaluationof the principals evaluationof the principals evaluation

� Remaining portion of Remaining portion of Remaining portion of Remaining portion of evaluation will be based on evaluation will be based on evaluation will be based on evaluation will be based on the Florida Principal the Florida Principal the Florida Principal the Florida Principal Leadership standards with Leadership standards with Leadership standards with Leadership standards with emphasis on recruiting and emphasis on recruiting and emphasis on recruiting and emphasis on recruiting and retaining effective teachers, retaining effective teachers, retaining effective teachers, retaining effective teachers, improving effectiveness of improving effectiveness of improving effectiveness of improving effectiveness of teachers and removing teachers and removing teachers and removing teachers and removing ineffective teachersineffective teachersineffective teachersineffective teachers

� Phase in the evaluation Phase in the evaluation Phase in the evaluation Phase in the evaluation system student growth system student growth system student growth system student growth model requirementsmodel requirementsmodel requirementsmodel requirements

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

4

� Miami Dade County Public Miami Dade County Public Miami Dade County Public Miami Dade County Public schools already complies schools already complies schools already complies schools already complies with State law which with State law which with State law which with State law which provides FLDOE the provides FLDOE the provides FLDOE the provides FLDOE the authority to approve authority to approve authority to approve authority to approve instructional evaluations instructional evaluations instructional evaluations instructional evaluations systemssystemssystemssystems

� MDCPS developed the IPEGS MDCPS developed the IPEGS MDCPS developed the IPEGS MDCPS developed the IPEGS evaluation system for teachers evaluation system for teachers evaluation system for teachers evaluation system for teachers and Managerial Exempt and Managerial Exempt and Managerial Exempt and Managerial Exempt Performance Appraisal (MEP) Performance Appraisal (MEP) Performance Appraisal (MEP) Performance Appraisal (MEP) as a Principal Evaluation as a Principal Evaluation as a Principal Evaluation as a Principal Evaluation Instrument which are now Instrument which are now Instrument which are now Instrument which are now being revised and aligned to being revised and aligned to being revised and aligned to being revised and aligned to the new requirements.the new requirements.the new requirements.the new requirements.

� Newly revised evaluation Newly revised evaluation Newly revised evaluation Newly revised evaluation system will assess system will assess system will assess system will assess performance based on valid performance based on valid performance based on valid performance based on valid and reliable assessment of and reliable assessment of and reliable assessment of and reliable assessment of student learning and the student learning and the student learning and the student learning and the comparable growth data comparable growth data comparable growth data comparable growth data available as well as the available as well as the available as well as the available as well as the appropriate performance appropriate performance appropriate performance appropriate performance standardsstandardsstandardsstandards

� Developed with teacher and Developed with teacher and Developed with teacher and Developed with teacher and principal involvementprincipal involvementprincipal involvementprincipal involvement

� Provide timely feedback to Provide timely feedback to Provide timely feedback to Provide timely feedback to educators being evaluatededucators being evaluatededucators being evaluatededucators being evaluated

� Include multiInclude multiInclude multiInclude multi----metric metric metric metric evaluation componentevaluation componentevaluation componentevaluation component

� Incorporate consistent training Incorporate consistent training Incorporate consistent training Incorporate consistent training and institute a system of and institute a system of and institute a system of and institute a system of continuous feedback on the continuous feedback on the continuous feedback on the continuous feedback on the improved systemimproved systemimproved systemimproved system

InstructionalPerformanceEvaluation andGrowthSystem

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

5

��Observation of StandardsObservation of Standards

��Goal Setting for Learner/Program Goal Setting for Learner/Program

Progress and Goal AttainmentProgress and Goal Attainment

��Required DocumentationRequired Documentation◦◦ End End –– of of ––Year Data Results SummaryYear Data Results Summary

◦◦ CommunicationCommunication

◦◦ Professional Development/ExperiencesProfessional Development/Experiences

��Summative Performance EvaluationSummative Performance Evaluation

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

6

Performance Standards

1. Learner/Program

Progress

7. Professionalism

8. Learning Environment4. Instructional Delivery

and Engagement

3. Instructional Planning

5. Assessment

6. Communication2. Knowledge of Learners

Performance Standards

1. Learner/Program

Progress

7. Professionalism

4. Program Delivery

3. Program Management

5. Assessment

6. Communication2. Knowledge of Learners

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

7

Comments RequiredComments RequiredComments RequiredComments RequiredComments RequiredComments RequiredComments RequiredComments Required for:for:for:for:

• Performance Standards 2: Knowledge of LearnersPerformance Standards 2: Knowledge of LearnersPerformance Standards 2: Knowledge of LearnersPerformance Standards 2: Knowledge of Learners

• Performance Standards 3: Instructional PlanningPerformance Standards 3: Instructional PlanningPerformance Standards 3: Instructional PlanningPerformance Standards 3: Instructional Planning

• Performance Standards 4: Instructional Delivery and EngagementPerformance Standards 4: Instructional Delivery and EngagementPerformance Standards 4: Instructional Delivery and EngagementPerformance Standards 4: Instructional Delivery and Engagement

• Performance Standards 8: Learning EnvironmentPerformance Standards 8: Learning EnvironmentPerformance Standards 8: Learning EnvironmentPerformance Standards 8: Learning Environment

• Performance Standards 1: Learner ProgressPerformance Standards 1: Learner ProgressPerformance Standards 1: Learner ProgressPerformance Standards 1: Learner Progress

• Performance Standards 5: AssessmentPerformance Standards 5: AssessmentPerformance Standards 5: AssessmentPerformance Standards 5: Assessment

• Performance Standards 6: CommunicationPerformance Standards 6: CommunicationPerformance Standards 6: CommunicationPerformance Standards 6: Communication

• Performance Standards 7: ProfessionalismPerformance Standards 7: ProfessionalismPerformance Standards 7: ProfessionalismPerformance Standards 7: Professionalism

Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard Not an observable standard -------- No comment required No comment required No comment required No comment required No comment required No comment required No comment required No comment required unless warrantedunless warrantedunless warrantedunless warrantedunless warrantedunless warrantedunless warrantedunless warranted::::

Yellow Handouts:

FM 7315: Teacher – page 53

FM 7313: Instructional Support – page 54

FM 7314: Student Services – page 57

Yellow Handouts:

FM 7315: Teacher – page 53

FM 7313: Instructional Support – page 54

FM 7314: Student Services – page 57

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

8

Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance: Informal Process for Improving Performance:

Professional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and AssistanceProfessional Support and Assistance

To give a rating of Developing/Needs Improvement:To give a rating of Developing/Needs Improvement:To give a rating of Developing/Needs Improvement:To give a rating of Developing/Needs Improvement:

•• Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is Collective evidence that indicates a professional is in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or in need of assistance and support to meet one or more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective more of the performance standards in an effective mannermannermannermannermannermannermannermanner

•• Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Indicated on the Observation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards FormObservation of Standards Form

•• Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every Both parties must communicate, at least every thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days thirty (30) days to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of to determine the effectiveness of the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified the activities regarding the identified performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)performance standard(s)

�� If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the If the professional is successfully meeting the standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is standard(s), no further support and assistance is requiredrequiredrequiredrequiredrequiredrequiredrequiredrequired

�� Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop Some professionals will need more time to develop and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches and improve their performance to ensure it reaches an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)an effective standard of performance (i.e., proficient)

�� Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered Therefore, a professional may be considered “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one “developing/needs improvement” for more than one evaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycleevaluation cycle

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

9

1) Support Dialogue (SD)1) Support Dialogue (SD)1) Support Dialogue (SD)1) Support Dialogue (SD)

•• Performance is Performance is Performance is Performance is Performance is Performance is Performance is Performance is unsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactoryunsatisfactory

•• Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD Professional is notified of a scheduled SD meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an meeting within 10 calendar days of an observationobservationobservationobservationobservationobservationobservationobservation

•• Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Support Dialogue (SD) Meeting Notification Form must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than fortyForm must be issued no later than forty--------eight eight eight eight eight eight eight eight (48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting(48) hours prior to the SD meeting

•• A twentyA twentyA twentyA twentyA twentyA twentyA twentyA twenty--------one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be one calendar day process; can be extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days extended for 10 work days

2) Improvement Plan2) Improvement Plan• Performance is unsatisfactory

• After unsuccessful completion of Support Dialogue

Gold Handout:

Teacher – page 62

Instructional Support – page 62

Student Services – page 67

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

10

� Assessors must approve all goals that meet the SMART criteria

� The goal is reviewed and approved approved approved approved approved approved approved approved by the last date of the first student interim progress reporting period ((((bybybybyOctober 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010October 29, 2010)))) or within the first 25 calendar days of a new teaching assignment

� Teachers whose goals are based on semester or trimester courses have a truncated goal setting process

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

11

� Professionals on an approved leave for more than for more than for more than for more than for more than for more than for more than for more than half of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the yearhalf of the year

� Professionals hired in the second grading period, after the second student interim progress reporting period

�� Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes Professionals whose job assignment changes and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after and/or who are transferred to a new position after the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting the second student interim progress reporting periodperiodperiodperiodperiodperiodperiodperiod

Goal Setting Exemptions:Goal Setting Exemptions:Goal Setting Exemptions:Goal Setting Exemptions:

White Handout-FM 7325

Teacher Handbook - page 52

Instructional Support - page 53

Student Services - page 57

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

12

Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Professional and the assessor use the same Documentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover SheetDocumentation Cover Sheet

• Professional summarizes and provides evidence of meeting performance standards

•• Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor Professional submits documentation to assessor 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the 35 calendar days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionalslast day of the school year for professionals

• Assessor makes evaluative notes on the form prior to the summative evaluation meeting

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

13

Pink Handout:

Teacher – page 55

Instructional Support – page 56

Student Services – page 60

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

14

The principal/site administrator, in collaboration with the assessor(s):

• determines the degree to which each performance standard is being performed based on the evidence provided

• applies the four-level rating rubric to evaluate performance on each standard

The principal/site administrator:• makes the final determination of the ratings and recommendation for continued employment

•• ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are ensures that all summative evaluation meetings are completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) completed by seven (7) calendar days (June 3, 2011) prior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionalsprior to the last day of school for professionals

� Step 1: Step 1: Step 1: Step 1:

Professional submits required end-of-year documentation by the submission date (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar (35 calendar

days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year days (by May 5, 2011) prior to the last day of the school year for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)for professionals)


Assessor reviews submitted documentation

Step 3: Step 3: Step 3: Step 3:

Site Administrator collaborates with assessor(s), applies the four-level rubric based on multiple data sources and completes the Summative Performance Evaluation Form

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

15


• A Summative evaluation meeting must be held

• The professional’s performance and ratings already decided by the principal/site administrator are discussed

• If professional agrees with the rating(s), the professional and the assessor initial each page, sign and date the evaluation form

If clarification of a rating(s) is needed, the professional may present additional information.

• Additional information is shared with the site administrator

• The assessor, if not the site administrator, and theprofessional neither initial nor sign the SummativePerformance Evaluation form


If the professional does not agree with the rating(s):

• A written response may be provided and attached to the Summative Performance Evaluation form of the professional

• All parties initial each page, sign and date the Summative Performance Evaluation form which denotes that a summative evaluation meeting occurred

The site administrator makes the final determination of the professional’s ratings and recommendation for continued employment

For procedural appeals to the IPEGS process, refer to the M-DCPS/UTD collective bargaining agreement

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

16


The original Summative Performance Evaluation form and the written response, if applicable, is/are submitted to the Personnel Records Department


The professional receives a completed copy of all forms and documents related to the IPEGS Summative Performance Evaluation by by by by by by by by the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional.the last day of the school year for the professional. These include:

• Goal Setting for Learner/Program Progress Form

• Documentation Cover Sheet (original documents attached to the Documentation Cover Sheet are returned to the professional)

• Summative Performance Evaluation form

NoteNoteNoteNote: A copy of the Observation of Standards Form is to be provided following the post-observation conference.

Green Handouts

FM 7317: Teacher – pages 58 - 61

FM 7316: Instructional Support – pages 59 - 61

FM 7318: Student Services – pages 63 - 66

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

17

Green Handouts

FM 7317: Teacher – pages 58 - 61

FM 7316: Instructional Support – pages 59 - 61

FM 7318: Student Services – pages 63 - 66

2010-2011 IPEGS Major Revisions Include:

Revised Forms

� Goal Setting for Learner/Program Progress

Form

� Observation of Standards Form

� New SD Meeting Notification Form

� Documentation Cover Sheet

� Summative Performance Evaluation

Informal and Formal Improvement Tools

Date for Submission of Required Documentation

Date for Completion of Summative Performance

Evaluations

2010-2011 IPEGS Updates 2010-2011

18

will j. gordillo, district director president of florida …casecec.org/documents/2011_wi/will...

Documents