william solecki, phd - warszawa 21.10… · william solecki, phd • professor of geography, hunter...
TRANSCRIPT
William Solecki, PhD
• Professor of Geography, Hunter College, City University of New York • Co-Chair on the New York City Panel on Climate (NPCC) – funded by
City of New York • Co-PI – Climate Change Risk in the Urban Northeast (CCRUN) –
funded by US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency • Co-PI – Transformation and Resilience in the Urban Coast (TRUC) –
funded by US National Science Foundation • Co-Investigator – Urban Resilience to Extreme Events (UrEX)
Sustainability Research Network – funded by US National Science Foundation
• Co-Founder and co-lead – Urban Climate Change Research Network (UCCRN) – funded by multiple agencies and organizations
• Editor – Journal of Extreme Events • Co-Editor – Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
1
Climate Variability and Risk and the New York Metropolitan Region:
Vulnerability, Disaster Risk Reduction, Adaptation, and Resilience
William Solecki Hunter College, City University of New York Temp Shifts from 1991-2012 compared to 1901-1960
average 2
Projections show change in average temperature (2071-2099 relative to 1970-1999 (source: NCND / CICS-NC
FUTURE TEMPERATURES
3
4
Climate Variability and Urban Systems and Residents
Main Message - U.S. urban residents and critical infrastructure systems are already experiencing climate change – and the impacts will accelerate in the coming decades 5
Climate Change
Observation and Projections
• Temperature and Precipitation Trends
• Sea Level Rise
• Other measures – snow cover, heat waves
• Extreme events
6
* Observations made in Central Park.
Temperature*
• Mean annual temperature has increased at a rate of 0.3°F per decade
• Total of 3.4°F since 1900
Observed Climate Trends (1900 – 2014)
Source: NPCC, 2015
Sea Level
• Sea level rise in NYC has averaged 1.2 inches per decade
• Total of 1.1 feet, nearly twice observed global rate over a similar time period
Precipitation*
• Mean annual precipitation has increased ~0.8 inches per decade
• Total of 8 inches since 1900
7
Weather and Climate Extreme Events
8
Observed Climate – Extreme Events
Source: NPCC, 2015; National Climate Assessment, 2014
Between 1958 and 2010, the Northeast saw more than a 70% increase in the amount of precipitation falling in very heavy events
(defined as the heaviest 1% of all daily events)
9
Source: New York City Panel on Climate Change (2015)
10
Key City-Focused Findings from the 2014 National Climate Assessment
• Climate change and its impacts threaten the well-being of urban residents in all U.S. regions. Essential infrastructure systems such as water, energy supply, and transportation will increasingly be compromised by interrelated climate change impacts.
• In urban settings, climate-related disruptions of services in one infrastructure system will almost always result in disruptions in one or more other infrastructure systems.
• See http://nca2014.globalchange.gov for more information.
11
Key City-Focused Findings from the 2014 National Climate Assessment
• Climate vulnerability and adaptive capacity of urban residents and communities are influenced by pronounced social inequalities that reflect age, ethnicity, gender, income, health, and (dis)ability differences.
• City government agencies and organizations have started adaptation plans that focus on infrastructure systems and public health. To be successful, these adaptation efforts require cooperative private sector and governmental activities, but institutions face many barriers to implementing coordinated efforts.
12
Source: NOAA 13
Hurricane Sandy, 28 October 2012
14
Source: PlaNYC 2013
Impacts and Associated Vulnerabilities
16
Urban Lifelines and Infrastructure System Failures
• Water Supply
• Electricity
• Transportation
• Gasoline Supply
• Pharmacy – Drug Supply
17
General Observations about Impacts and Vulnerabilities
• Cascading system impacts • Uneven geography – not all on the coast, but
most impactful on coast • Highly complex systems require significant
redundancy and context specific vulnerabilities – e.g. health care system
• Role of ecosystem protection opportunities – lost and found – e.g. wetlands
• Data rich assessment – smart city context yielding critical data – challenge is how to use it
• A lot more impact and vulnerability work to be done
18
19
Source: PlaNYC 2013
20
What Does Hurricane Sandy Mean?
• New York City is prone to losses from weather-related disasters.
• Top 10 in population vulnerable to coastal flooding; Second only to Miami in assets exposed to coastal flooding
• What did it reveal about exposure and vulnerability and urban infrastructure system connections?
• What does it mean for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation?
Observed Inundation – Hurricane Sandy
Change in conceptualization of extreme events. From discrete acute events to events as part of a chronic process; Looking into future dynamics as much as the present and past; Use a systems perspective to look at interactions and opportunities for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation
Source: http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/11/hurricane-sandy-one-week-after-landfall/100399/
22
Cascading Exposure and Vulnerability of Social-
Ecological-Technological Systems
Blackouts and water supply
Electrical Power Generation and
Distribution
Transportation
All the East River Subway Tunnels flooded – although pumped out quickly salt water-related corrosion increasingly evident.
Liquid Fuel Terminals and Gas Shortages
27
Liquid Fuels Supply Chain for New York City
Social Vulnerability
30
South Brooklyn and Jamaica Bay Queens, including the Rockaway peninsula. Tax lots are ranked from low (dark green), to low-medium (light-green), to medium (yellow), to medium-high (orange), to high values (red). Source: Patrick 2015
33
34
Overall Flood Risk Index for South Brooklyn and Jamaica Bay, Queens The overall flood risk index for south Brooklyn and Jamaica Bay Queens, including the Rockaway peninsula. Tax lots are ranked from low (dark green) to high values (red), and the 500-year flood zone for the 2050s is shown in transparent blue (right). Source: Patrick 2015
Breezy Point, Queens, NYC October 2012
Disaster Risk Reduction
36
Critical Questions
• What is the role of city services (fire brigades, road service, water supply service etc.) and citizens and other organizations like the US National Guard in activities undertaken in crisis situation?
• How do you organize road traffic (or traffic generally - subway etc.) in crisis situation?
• Who is in charge?; or what is the system of management in crisis situation?
• What is the system of air quality evaluation in the city? How do you evaluate the air quality (in times of crisis and otherwise)?
• What measures are used to adopt to climate changes / to mitigate? • What are legal regulations; How current legal regulations support
or not adaptation to climate changes?
37
Emergency Management in NYC and the NYC Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014
(with NYS and Federal Contexts)
Emergency Management Phases
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 5. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Generalized Organizational Structure for the 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 13. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Hazard Mitigation Planning
New York State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (January 2014)
New York City Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (March 2009, revised 2014)
• 1.Identification of vulnerable areas
• 2.Identification of facilities vulnerable by virtue of proximity to vulnerable areas
• 3.Risk assessments to determine degree of risk by type of facility
• 4.Process to engage stakeholders
1. Vulnerabilities: Example of Storm Surge Inundation
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 115. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Identification of Vulnerable Areas: Distribution of Poverty, NYC
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014. P. 63 Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
2. Locating Vulnerable
Facilities
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 189. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
3.The Risk Assessment Process for Emergency Management
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 44. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Risk-Based Approach: Combining Hazards and Consequences to Prioritize Response Resources
Source: NYS Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services (January 2014) 2014 NYS Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Albany, NY: NYS, p. 3.0-32, available at
http://www.dhses.ny.gov/oem/mitigation/documents/2014-shmp/2014-SHMP-full.pdf
4. Public Engagement: Outreach Structure, NYC 2014 HMP
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014, p. 21. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Response: Evacuation Planning
City of New York (2014) New York City Hazard Mitigation Plan 2014. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/downloads/pdf/hazard_mitigation/plan_update_2014/final_nyc_hmp.pdf
Examples of Typical Organizations Involved in Response
• Emergency Medical Services (EMSs)
• Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs), e.g., with Advanced Life Support (ALS) certification
• Emergency Operations Centers or EOCs (Scanlon’s case account of Gander)
• Emergency Services Strike Teams
• Police, fire, sanitation, transportation (depending on service and facility needs)
• Volunteer Organizations
Electric Power Recovery from Hurricanes Irene and Sandy: the role of “Mutual Assistance”
U. S. Department of Energy (2013) Comparing the Impacts of Northeast Hurricanes on Energy Infrastructure. [Online], pp. 12-13, 27 citing reports from the Edison Electric Institute. Available from: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/04/f0/Northeast%20Storm%20Comparison_FINAL_041513c.pdf
• Utilities relied on assistance in the form of workers from other utilities across the U.S.: • Following Hurricane Irene, 50,000 workers were used • Following Hurricane Sandy, 67,000 workers were used
• Support was also obtained in the form of equipment • Networks to tap this assistance are usually established in
advance • The U.S. DOE deployed 31 emergency responders (“ESF-12”) in
Hurricane Irene and 35 in Hurricane Sandy
New York City Plans for Coastal Protection
City of New York (April 22, 2015) One New York: The Plan for a Strong and Just City, pp. 248-249 http://www.nyc.gov/html/onenyc/downloads/pdf/publications/OneNYC.pdf
Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency
52
New York City Climate Adaptation Process
53 Source: NPCC, 2010
Stakeholder Task Force
City-wide Sustainability Office
Expert Panel
C W W
P
T
E
Mayor or City Official
Stakeholders
- City Agencies
- Regional Authorities
- Private Corporations
Integration across Sector-specific Working Groups
- Energy (E) - Transportation (T)
- Policy (P) -Water & Waste (WW)
- Communications (C)
Expert Knowledge Providers
- University scholars and private sector experts
- Social, biological, and physical scientists
- Legal and insurance experts
- Risk management professionals
High-Level Buy-In
Coordinating Role
Climate Risk Information
Adaptation Assessment Guidelines
Climate Protection Levels
Critical Infrastructure
PlaNYC 2013 – Released 11 June 2013
54
NYC Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency
• Addresses how to rebuild New York City to be more resilient in the wake of Sandy but with a long‐term focus on: – 1) how to rebuild locally; and – 2) how to improve citywide infrastructure and building
resilience
• A comprehensive report in June 2013 addresses these challenges by investigating three key questions: – What happened during and after Sandy and why? – What is the likely risk to NYC as the climate changes and
the threat of future storms and severe weather increases?
– What to do in the coastal neighborhoods and citywide infrastructure
55
Strengthening Coastal Defenses
Secured funding for nearly half of the City’s $3.7 billion first phase coastal protection program
Started design on vital $335 million Lower East Side coastal resiliency project
Launched $100 million shoreline improvement program
Placed over 4.2 million cubic yards of sand on city beaches
Advanced vital USACE projects in the Rockaways, Jamaica Bay, Sea Gate, and Staten Island
Created a new Science and Resilience Institute at Jamaica Bay
Comprehensive Coastal Protection Plan – Phase I
Progress
One New York: The Plan for a Strong and Just City
The plan envisions how we want our City to look in ten years and beyond
OneNYC recognizes a historical moment: in 2025, we will celebrate our 400th
anniversary and begin our fifth century.
OneNYC In April 2015, Mayor Bill de Blasio released a new long-term strategic plan to address our most pressing challenges.
We commit to the goals and initiatives designed to achieve that long-term vision
57
58
Our Growing, Thriving City
Our Just and Equitable
City
Our Sustainable City
Our Resilient City
OneNYC: Our Four Visions This plan is organized across four strategic visions for growth, equity, sustainability, and resiliency.
58
Resiliency NPCC3 is being launched in support of the City’s climate resiliency program. It’s important to first define what resiliency means to us in New York City.
59
Our neighborhoods, economy, and public services will be ready to withstand and emerge stronger from the impacts of climate change and other 21st century threats
Our Resilient City
2008
2013
New York City Panel on Climate
Change is convened
A Stronger, More Resilient New
York/Climate Risk Information 2013
NPCC2 publishes 2015 projections
2015 2009
NPCC1 publishes Climate Data Projections
FEMA Preliminary FIRMs
2014
Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency established;
One City, Rebuilding Together
2015
One New York, the Plan for a Strong and Just New
York City
Launch NPPC3
September
2011
PlaNYC update
OneNYC: Our Resilient City The City’s plan builds on prior efforts in both the current and prior administrations…
Neighborhoods Every city neighborhood will be safer by strengthening community, social, and economic resiliency
Infrastructure Infrastructure systems across the region will adapt to enable continue services
Coastal Defense New York City’s coastal defenses will be strengthened against flooding and sea level rise
Buildings The city’s buildings will be upgraded against changing climate impacts
OneNYC: Our Resilient City …And strengthens and expands the City’s commitment to a multilayered approach to resiliency.
61
Our neighborhoods, economy, and public services will be ready to withstand and emerge stronger from the impacts of climate change and other 21st century threats. New York City will… • Eliminate disaster-related long-term displacement of New
Yorkers from homes by 2050 • Reduce the Social Vulnerability Index for neighborhoods across
the city • Reduce average annual economic losses resulting from climate-
related events
Goal: Eliminate disaster-related long-
term displacement of New Yorkers from homes by 2050
Metrics:
1. Social Vulnerability Index for neighborhoods across the city
2. Average annual economic losses resulting from climate-related events
OneNYC: Our Resilient City To measure our efforts, the City has identified a long-term goal and two key metrics to monitor.
62
Identify critical infrastructure in New York City that could be at-risk from the effects of climate change Facilitate knowledge sharing and to develop coordinated adaptation strategies to secure these assets
Climate Change Adaptation Task Force
Adopt uniform climate change projections for NYC
Key Activities
Create inventory of at-risk infrastructure
Develop adaptation strategies to protect at-risk infrastructure
Coordinate adaptation strategies across stakeholders
Identify issues for further study
Develop design guidelines to protect critical infrastructure
Objectives
1
2
3
4
5
6
Energy Transportation Freight Rail & Shipping Water and Waste Etc.
Stakeholders will work in working groups to assess climate risks across sectors
64
CCATF Organizational Structure
Working Groups 60 Stakeholders
City Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies Private Sector
Sea Level Rise Heat Extreme wind Extreme precipitation Public Health
Issues
Updated risk assessment Design standards
Outputs
Scientific Advisory Panels
New York City Panel on Climate Change Urban Heat Island Mitigation Working Group
Resilience and Adaptation – Conditions for Success
• Flexibility, broad cross-disciplinary involvement and buy-in • Embedding climate change into work and planning streams
rather than developing a special system • Prioritizing "no-regrets” strategies and meeting multiple
goals; multi-policy approach to adaptation • Planning for and executing effective communication with
residents • Top level engagement with a central point of coordination • Coordination with other infrastructure and service
providers within the service-shed of urban systems. • Integrate resiliency and adaptation into regular
infrastructure capital upgrades
65
Resiliency and Adaptation – Opportunities
• Connecting operations and management
• Creating science-policy interface panels
• Robust indicator and monitoring systems; need metrics of resiliency and adaptation success
• More pro-active use of extreme events as learning moments
66
Resiliency and Adaptation – Challenges
• Confidence in the climate science and climate scientists
• Coordination across varying urban infrastructure systems and interconnecting systems across metropolitan scales
• Connecting short term planning with long term planning – possible through flexible pathway approach
• Funding for resiliency and adaptation – possible through mitigation-adaptation link and other funding options (ensuring that adaptation and mitigation activities are synergistic and not in conflict – e.g. air conditioning increases adds more GHG emissions)
67
Policy Non-Stationarity - Freeboard
“Freeboard” is the practice of elevating a building’s lowest floor above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) by a small additional height, typically 1 to 2 feet above FEMA minimum height requirements, depending on building type (2 feet for single and two- family residences and 1 foot for most other buildings). The benefits of freeboard include an additional margin of safety to protect against more severe storms and increased future flood risks from rising sea levels. Additionally, FEMA recognizes that freeboard significantly reduces flood risk and provides substantial reductions in flood insurance premiums.
Freeboard
Final Considerations
• Tying policy directly to changing climate science
• Building flexible adaption directly into the legal and regulatory framework
• Opportunities for transformation – extreme events
• Solution space – policy, regulation, and codes; translation into the realm of engineering and equity…next steps
Intense rainfall – panhandle Florida April 2014
Extreme Rain Event – Long Island NY August 2014