wilson street parking structure transportation impact...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
July 2016
-
Project Summary
Project Number 160520
July 2016
Client Walterfedy 675 Queen Street South, Suite 111 Kitchener ON N2M 1A1
Client Contact Mark Christensen, P.Eng.
Consultant Project Team Jim Mallet, M.A.Sc., P.Eng, PTOE Jill Juhlke, Dipl.T, C.E.T, MITE Heather Goodman, B.Eng., EIT
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study
List of Revisions
Version Date Author Description
1 June 2016 JM/JJ/HG Draft for Comment
2 July 2016 JM/JJ/HG Draft for Comment
Signatures and Seals
Signature Engineer’s Seal
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 22 King Street South Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8 p: 519.896.3163 www.ptsl.com
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof (the “project”) and except for approval and commenting municipalities and agencies in their review and approval of this project, should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authorization of Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited being obtained. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the project for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited for all loss or damage resulting there from. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned and the approval and commenting municipalities and agencies for the project.
To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether through contract or tort, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited and used by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited in preparing this report.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
http:www.ptsl.com
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Executive Summary
Content
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited (Paradigm) was retained by The City of Guelph through WalterFedy to conduct this Transportation Impact Study for a proposed parking structure to be located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Wilson Street and Northumberland Street in the downtown core of Guelph, Ontario.
This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) includes an analysis of existing traffic conditions, a description of the proposed development and traffic flow scenarios, traffic forecasts for a fifteen-year horizon (2031) and recommendations to improve future traffic conditions.
Development Concept
The proposed parking structure will replace the existing Wilson Street surface parking lot. It is planned to provide parking for up to 500 vehicles and secure storage for an additional 60 bicycles.
The garage access has been designed to provide inbound flows via Wilson Street into the lower level and from the north via Northumberland Street into Level 2. Outbound flows will be directed out from Level 1 onto Wilson Street and from Level 2 onto Northumberland, if specified. The analysis considered eight (8) traffic and access scenarios:
Scenario 1 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation to stay one-way northbound from Norfolk/Gordon to Northumberland.
Scenario 2 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and two lanes from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street., Northumberland (1 inbound). Wilson Street operation to stay one-way northbound from Norfolk/Gordon to Northumberland.
Scenario 3 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street and one lane onto Northumberland Street. Wilson Street operation to stay one-way northbound from Norfolk/Gordon to Northumberland.
Scenario 4 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation to switch to one-way southbound from Northumberland to Norfolk/Gordon.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page i
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Scenario 5 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and two lanes from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation to switch to one-way southbound from Northumberland to Norfolk/Gordon.
Scenario 6 – Inbound flows via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Outbound flows via two lanes onto Wilson Street and one lane onto Northumberland. Wilson Street operation to switch to one-way southbound from Northumberland to Norfolk/Gordon.
Scenario 7 – Scenario 1 traffic flows from site. Wilson Street operation to switch to one-way northbound all the way to MacDonell.
Scenario 8 – Scenario 4 traffic flows from site. Wilson Street operation to switch to one-way southbound from MacDonell to Norfolk/Gordon.
Conclusions
Based on the analyses contained in the report, it concluded that:
All intersections and individual movements within the study area are currently operating overall at acceptable levels of service except:
The northbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street (LOS E, PM peak hour); and
The southbound through movement at the intersection of Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street (LOS E, AM peak hour).
Development of a 500-space parking structure on the site is forecast to produce 260 peak hour trips (216 more than the current Wilson Street lot) during each of the AM and PM peak hours;
Under the forecast 2031 background traffic conditions, all intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS E during AM peak hour)
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 1 traffic conditions, all intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service. The following intersections are forecast to operate at LOS E or F:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS F during the AM peak hour);
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page ii
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
MacDonell Street and Wilson Street (LOS E during the PM peak hour); and
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (LOS F during the PM peak hour).
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 2 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS F during the AM peak hour);
MacDonell Street and Wilson Street (LOS E during the PM peak hour); and
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (LOS F during the PM peak hour).
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 3 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS F during the AM peak hour);
MacDonell Street and Wilson Street (LOS E during the PM peak hour); and
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (LOS F during the PM peak hour).
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 4 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to continue to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS E during the AM and PM peak hour);
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 5 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours);
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page iii
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 6 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours);
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 7 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS F during the AM peak hour); and
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (LOS F during the PM peak hour).
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
Under the forecast 2031 Access Scenario 8 traffic conditions, the intersections within the study area are forecast to operate within acceptable levels of service except:
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours);
In addition, several individual movements are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during the peak hours.
If northbound flow on Wilson Street is maintained, the placement of the site entrance does not provide adequate safe stopping distance which could cause potential safety issues. If southbound flow on Wilson Street is introduced, the site entrance would meet TAC minimum sight distances.
No remedial measures are required in order to accommodate the increase in traffic directly related to the proposed development.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page iv
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Recommendations
The project team meeting with City staff on 05 July 2016 determined the optimal access/egress configuration for the garage as one lane inbound from Wilson, one lane inbound from Northumberland, two lanes outbound to Wilson and one lane outbound to Northumberland. Scenarios 3 and 6 are consistent with this configuration.
Based on the findings of the study and the chosen access/egress configuration, it is recommended that Scenario 6 be shortlisted for evaluation by the project team with full consideration to all project parameters.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page v
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Contents
1 Introduction ............................................................... 1 1.1 Overview .............................................................................................1
2 Existing Conditions ................................................... 3 2.1 Road Network ....................................................................................3 2.2 Transit Routes ....................................................................................4 2.3 Cycling Facilities ................................................................................7 2.4 Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................7 2.5 Traffic Operations............................................................................10
3 Development Concept ............................................ 13 3.1 Development Description ...............................................................13 3.2 Development Driveway Sight Distance .........................................14 3.3 Development Trip Generation .........................................................15 3.4 Development Trip Distribution and Assignment ...........................17 3.4.1 Scenario 1..........................................................................................17 3.4.2 Scenario 2..........................................................................................22 3.4.3 Scenario 3..........................................................................................27 3.4.4 Scenario 4..........................................................................................32 3.4.5 Scenario 5..........................................................................................37 3.4.6 Scenario 6..........................................................................................42 3.4.7 Scenario 7..........................................................................................47 3.4.8 Scenario 8..........................................................................................52
4 Evaluation of Future Traffic Conditions ................ 57 4.1 2031 Future Background Traffic Volumes .....................................57 4.2 2031 Future Background Traffic Operations .................................57 4.2.1 Northbound Flow on Wilson Street ...................................................57 4.2.2 Southbound Flow on Wilson Street ...................................................58 4.3 2031 Future Total Traffic Operations .............................................67 4.3.1 Scenario 1..........................................................................................67 4.3.2 Scenario 2..........................................................................................72 4.3.3 Scenario 3..........................................................................................77 4.3.4 Scenario 4..........................................................................................82 4.3.5 Scenario 5..........................................................................................87 4.3.6 Scenario 6..........................................................................................92 4.3.7 Scenario 7..........................................................................................97 4.3.8 Scenario 8........................................................................................102
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page vi
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
4.4 Evaluation of Scenarios .................................................................107
5 Remedial Measures .............................................. 108 5.1 Signal Warrants ..............................................................................108 5.2 Left-Turn Lanes ..............................................................................108
6 Conclusions and Recommendations .................. 109 6.1 Conclusions....................................................................................109 6.2 Recommendations .........................................................................111
Appendices Appendix A: Existing Turning Movement Counts Appendix B: Signal Timings Appendix C: Existing Traffic Operations Reports Appendix D: 2031 Background Traffic Operations Reports Appendix E: 2031 Future Total Traffic Operations Reports
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page vii
-
Figures Figure 1.1: Study Area and Subject Development Location .................2 Figure 2.1: Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control ................5 Figure 2.2: Existing Transit Routes .........................................................6 Figure 2.3: Base Year AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .........................8 Figure 2.4: Base Year PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..........................9 Figure 3.1: Development Concept Site Plan.........................................16 Figure 3.2: AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 1 ............18 Figure 3.3: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 1 ............19 Figure 3.4: ..AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 1 .. 20 Figure 3.5: ...PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 1 . 21 Figure 3.6: ............
............ AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 2 23
Figure 3.7: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 2 24 Figure 3.8: ....
.... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 2 25
Figure 3.9: PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 2 26 Figure 3.10: AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 3 ............
............28
Figure 3.11: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 3 29 Figure 3.12: .... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 3 30 Figure 3.13: .... PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 3 31 Figure 3.14: ............
............ AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 4 33
Figure 3.15: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 4 34 Figure 3.16: ....
.... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 4 35
Figure 3.17: PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 4 36 Figure 3.18: AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 5 ............
...........38
Figure 3.19: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 5 . 39 Figure 3.20: ....
.... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 5 40
Figure 3.21: PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 5 41 Figure 3.22: AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 6 ............
............43
Figure 3.23: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 7 44 Figure 3.24: .... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 6 45 Figure 3.25: .... PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 6 46 Figure 3.26: AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 7 ............
............48
Figure 3.27: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 7 49 Figure 3.28: ....
.... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 7 50
Figure 3.29: PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 7 51 Figure 3.30: ............
............AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 8 53
Figure 3.31: PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution – Scenario 8 54 Figure 3.32: ....
.... AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 8 55
Figure 3.33: PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips – Scenario 8 56 Figure 4.1: 2031 AM Peak Hour Background Traffic Forecasts –
Northbound Flow on Wilson Street ....................................59 Figure 4.2: 2031 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Forecasts –
Northbound Flow on Wilson Street ....................................60 Figure 4.3: 2031 AM Peak Hour Background Traffic Forecasts –
Southbound Flow on Wilson Street....................................61
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page viii
-
Figure 4.4: 2031 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Forecasts –
Southbound Flow on Wilson Street....................................62
Figure 4.5: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 1 ............................................................................. 68
Figure 4.6: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 1 .............................................................................69
Figure 4.7: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 2 .............................................................................73
Figure 4.8: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 2 .............................................................................74
Figure 4.9: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 3 .............................................................................78
Figure 4.10: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 3 .............................................................................79
Figure 4.11: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 4 .............................................................................83
Figure 4.12: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 4 .............................................................................84
Figure 4.13: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 5 .............................................................................88
Figure 4.14: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 5 .............................................................................89
Figure 4.15: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 6 .............................................................................93
Figure 4.16: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 6 .............................................................................94
Figure 4.17: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 7 .............................................................................98
Figure 4.18: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 7 .............................................................................99
Figure 4.19: 2031 Future Total AM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 8 ...........................................................................103
Figure 4.20: 2031 Future Total PM Peak Hour Traffic Forecasts –
Scenario 8 ...........................................................................104
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page ix
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Tables
Table 2.1: Table 3.1: Table 3.2: Table 3.3: Table 3.4: Table 3.5: Table 3.6: Table 3.6: Table 3.7: Table 3.8: Table 4.1:
Table 4.2:
Table 4.3: Table 4.4: Table 4.5: Table 4.6: Table 4.7: Table 4.8: Table 4.9: Table 4.10:
Base Year Peak Hour Traffic Operations...........................11 Estimated Site Trip Generation ...........................................15 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................17 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................22 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................27 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................32 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................37 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................42 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................47 Estimated Site Trip Distribution for Scenario 1 .................52 2031 Background Operations Summary – Northbound
Flow on Wilson Street..........................................................63 2031 Background Operations Summary – Southbound
Flow on Wilson Street..........................................................65 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 1 ......70 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 2 ......75 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 3 ......80 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 4 ......85 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 5 ......90 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 6 ......95 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 7 ....100 2031 Future Total Operations Summary – Scenario 8 ....105
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page x
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
1 Introduction
1.1 Overview
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited (Paradigm) was retained to conduct this Transportation Impact Study for a proposed parking structure located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Wilson Street and Northumberland Street in the downtown core of Guelph, Ontario. Figure 1.1 details the location of the subject development.
The scope of the study includes:
determination and assessment of the current traffic and conditions in the vicinity of the existing site,
estimating of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed parking structure;
analyzing the impact that this traffic may have on the adjacent street system at the intersections of:
Waterloo Avenue/Wilson Street and Norfolk Street/Gordon Street (signalized);
Norfolk Street and MacDonell Street (signalized);
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (signalized);
MacDonell Street and Wilson Street/Private Entrance (two-way Stop control);
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (signalized);
Carden Street and Wilson Street (one-way Stop control);
Carden Street and Wyndham Street (signalized);
Wilson Street and Northumberland Street/Parking Lot Entrance (one-way Stop control); and
The garage driveway connection to Wilson Street (one-way Stop control).
making recommendations regarding any necessary remedial measures required to mitigate the site generated traffic in a satisfactory manner.
This Transportation Impact Study (TIS) includes an analysis of existing traffic conditions, a description of the proposed development and traffic scenarios, traffic forecasts for a horizon of fifteen years from today (2031), and recommendations to improve future traffic conditions. The scope of the project was developed in consultation with the City of Guelph.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 1
-
Paisley St
Wyn
dha
m S
t
No
rfo
lk S
t
MacDonell St
Carden St
Wilson Street Parking Structure Wilson St
Study Area
Study Area & Subject Development Wi lson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520 Figure 1.1
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
2 Existing Conditions This section documents current traffic conditions, operational deficiencies, and constraints experienced by the public travelling at the intersections within the study area. The operational deficiencies and constraints identified at this stage will be fundamental to the process of defining any required remedial measures.
2.1 Road Network
The roadways in the study area include:
Wilson Street is a local road with a speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour. South of Northumberland Street, Wilson Street is a northbound one-way street with a one-lane urban cross section. North of Northumberland Street, Wilson Street traffic operates as two-way traffic flow with a two-lane urban cross-section. Sidewalks and on-street bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of the roadway. The southbound bicycle lane ends at Northumberland Street. Wilson Street is known as Waterloo Avenue west of Norfolk Street/Gordon Street.
Northumberland Street is a two-way dead-end street providing rear access to the businesses on Wilson Street.
Carden Street is an east-west local road with a posted speed limit of 30 kilometres per hour. On-street angle parking is present on the north side of the roadway. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. City Hall and Civic Square front the south side of Carden Street and the Guelph Central Station is located on Carden Street, east of the intersection with Wyndham Street.
MacDonell Street is an east-west arterial roadway with a speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour. Within the study area, MacDonell has a two-lane urban cross-section with auxiliary turning lanes provided at its intersections with Norfolk Street and Wyndham Street. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. On-street angle parking is present on both sides of the roadway. There is a large municipal surface parking lot on the north side of MacDonell Street, between Wilson Street and Wyndham Street.
Norfolk Street/Gordon Street is a north-south arterial roadway with a speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour. North of the intersection with Waterloo Avenue/Wilson Street, Norfolk Street has a three-lane (two north, one south) urban cross-section. South of Waterloo Avenue/Wilson Street, Gordon Street has a four-lane urban cross-section. On-street bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of the roadway. North of Waterloo Avenue/Wilson Street a sidewalk is only provided on the west side of the road.
Wyndham Street North is a north-south arterial roadway with a speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour. Within the immediate study
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 3
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
area, Wyndham Street has a two-lane urban cross-section with auxiliary turning lanes. North of the intersection with MacDonell Street, Wyndham Street widens to a four-lane cross-section. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway, as well as on-street bicycle lanes south of the intersection with Carden Street. On-street parking is present on both sides of the roadway between Carden Street and MacDonell Street.
Paisley Street/Quebec Street is an east-west arterial road with two-lane urban cross-section and a speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour. Auxiliary turning lanes are provided at the intersection with Norfolk Street/Yarmouth Street. Sidewalks are present along both side of the roadway and on-street parking is present on Quebec Street.
Figure 2.1 summarizes existing lane configurations and traffic control.
2.2 Transit Routes
Guelph Central Station and the Guelph VIA Rail Station are located immediately east of Wyndham Street on Carden Street just outside of the study area. Guelph Transit operates a number of routes in the study area, three of which operate adjacent to the proposed parking structure:
Route 5 (Gordon) services southeast Guelph via Gordon Street, Farley Drive, Goodwin Drive, Victoria Road South and Arkell Road. Service runs from 5:45 AM to 12:45 AM on 30 minute headways Monday through Saturday and on 30 minute headways from 9:15 AM to 7:15 PM on Sundays.
Route 8 (Stone Road Mall) services the Stone Road Mall area from Guelph Central Station. Service runs from 5:45 AM to 12:40 AM on 30 minute headways Monday through Friday, on 30 minute headways from 6:15 AM to 12:40 AM on Saturdays and on 30 minute headways from 9:15 to 6:40 PM on Sundays.
Route 9 (Waterloo): services the west-central area of Guelph via Waterloo Avenue, Wellington Street, Imperial Way, Paisley Road and Elmira Road. Service runs from 5:45 AM to 12:40 AM on 30 minute headways Monday through Saturday and on 30 minute headways from 9:15 AM to 7:10 on Sundays.
Transit Routes 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16 and 20 also run in the vicinity of the study area. Figure 2.2 shows the existing transit routes in the vicinity of the study area.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 4
-
Yarmouth kee
t Street olfrN
o rtS
Quebec Street
Paisley Street k
olf reet
r
No tS
ay m
kl t e
hao ef at ew
t e
r e v v nd
e
No r i i y r
St r r
P D W St
MacDonell Street
k t t
nl e eoo ef ilser rr
No St
St
W
Carden Carden Street Street
m
handy reet
W
tS
Northumberland Street no
ils ree
t t
W S
ol
kfr eet
N
o rS
t
Wilson Street
Waterloo Ave
don
eet
ror St
G
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520 Figure 2.1
Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control
-
Dev
elop
men
t Lo
catio
n
Wils
on S
treet
Par
king
Stru
ctur
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Impa
ct S
tud
y Fi
gure
2.2
1605
20
Exist
ing
Tran
sit R
oute
s
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
2.3 Cycling Facilities
The City of Guelph 2013 Cycle Master Plan details cycling facilities in the City of Guelph. On-street bike lanes are currently present on Norfolk Street/Gordon Street, Wilson Street, Paisley Street and Wyndham Street south of Carden Street. MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street north of Carden Street have wide curb lanes for cyclists.
2.4 Traffic Volumes
AM and PM peak period traffic counts provided by the City of Guelph included:
Waterloo Avenue/Wilson Street and Norfolk Street/Gordon Street (24 September 2013);
Norfolk Street and MacDonell Street (17 April 2013);
Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street and Yarmouth Street (24 November 2015);
MacDonell Street and Wilson Street/Private Entrance (19 September 2013);
MacDonell Street and Wyndham Street (18 April 2013); and
Carden Street and Wyndham Street (18 April 2013).
Consultation with City staff confirmed these counts were acceptable for use in this study. The remaining intersections within the study area were counted by Paradigm using Miovision cameras on 26 April 2016 for the AM (07:00 to 09:00) and PM (15:00 to 18:00) peak hours.
To establish baseline conditions, volumes were increased at 1.8% per annum where required. The existing volumes were smoothed using the April 2016 counts. On-street parking affects “between intersection” flows, resulting in minor inconsistencies between intersections.
Figure 2.3 and Figure 2.4 summarize the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes respectively. Appendix A contains the existing count data.
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 7
-
Yarmouth
823
Gor
don
Str
eet
652
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
137
92 444
116
155
99 668 0 Wilson
Street 191
469 177 253
Parking Lot
0 249
Wils
onS
tree
t
249
Nor
folk
Str
eet
767
621
Wils
onS
tree
t
249
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 249
2122
0 176
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 24
9
218
76 75 43 47
2 195 54
10
17 180
16
20 Carden Street 34 1
1 35 35 13 34
244
23 174
229
243
1 22
Carden Street 1
714
1
765
Nor
folk
Str
eet
21
Wils
onS
tree
t
171
620
228
181
27 155
6213 26603 17
109
39 0 189
166 25 180 124 124 2 299 242 35 306
63
50 104 161 105 97 201 203 8 169
240
668
107 MacDonell
Street
3 0 1 0 34 120
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
775
4 217
707 2
126
Nor
folk
Str
eet
749
454
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
51
92 251
76 35119
224 68 230 336 40 183
23 555
29
34 Quebec Street 109
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
607 146
310
19
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520 Figure 2.3
Base Year AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
-
Figure 2.4
Yarmouth
909
Gor
don
Str
eet
820
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
79
146
581
93152
203
757 3 Wilson
Street 349
347 116 175
Parking Lot
0 0W
ilson
Str
eet
0
Nor
folk
Str
eet
963
697
Wils
onS
tree
t
175
0
0 0
0
0 0
0 175
1736
0 255
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 17
5
202
104 102 65 39
3 121 54
1
16 169
21
24 Carden Street 62 1
1 63 57 9 34
257
52 271
183
258
2 50
Carden Street 4
021
0
909
Nor
folk
Str
eet
54
Wils
onS
tree
t
275
626
207
150
36 181
4028 40601 25
117
96 0 111
371 56 419 166 146 1 228 261 71 282
92
93 214 361 270 246 460 459 25 388
345
663
141 MacDonell
Street
2 1 0 2 65 179
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
804
3 336
815 3
118
Nor
folk
Str
eet
647
655
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
ϱϯ
192
396
30 37104
459 94 452 335 60 168
48 435
27
ϲϭ Quebec Street 219
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
510 161
534
78
Base Year PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
2.5 Traffic Operations
Intersection level of service (LOS) is a recognized method of quantifying the average delay experienced by drivers at intersections. It is based on the delay experienced by individual vehicles executing the various movements. The delay is related to the number of vehicles desiring to make a particular movement, compared to the estimated capacity for that movement. The capacity is based on a number of criteria related to the opposing traffic flows and intersection geometry.
The highest possible rating is LOS A, under which the average total delay is equal or less than 10.0 seconds per vehicle. When the average delay exceeds 80 seconds for signalized intersections, 50 seconds for unsignalized intersections or when the volume to capacity ratio is greater than 1.0, the movement is classed as LOS F and remedial measures are usually implemented, if they are feasible. LOS E is usually used as a guideline for the determination of road improvement needs on through lanes, while LOS F may be acceptable for left-turn movements at peak times, depending on delays.
The operations of intersections in the study area were evaluated with the existing turning movement volumes using Synchro 9. The current signal timings were provided by the City of Guelph.
The intersection analysis considered three separate measures of performance:
LOS for each movement and the entire intersection;
The volume to capacity (v/c) ratio for each movement and the entire intersection; and
The estimated 95th percentile queue lengths for each movement.
The existing intersection operations are summarized in Table 2.1 indicating the existing levels of service (LOS), volume to capacity ratios (V/C) and 95th percentile queues experienced within the study area, for the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix B contains signal timings provided by the City of Guelph. Appendix C contains the detailed Synchro reports.
The analyses indicate that all intersections and individual movements within the study area are currently operating overall at acceptable levels of service except:
The northbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street (LOS E, PM peak hour); and
The southbound through movement at the intersection of Norfolk Street and Paisley Street/Quebec Street (LOS E, AM peak hour).
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 10
-
TABLE 2.1: BASE YEAR PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
Direction / Movement / Approach
od
ireP Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound s Control i Intersection MOE s Type h
ach h h
ach hy t l g t g t g tt u h t u h a
ch gt u h tf u ach
a f o f o f ho o ver
all
An Le o
g r o g r o g r o gr p Le Le ORi r Ri p r p Le
Ri r Ri rp
Th p Th p Th p Th p
A A A A
LOS C C C C B B A B < C > C C Norfolk Street/ Delay 29 28 25 27 11 12 8 11 < 26 > 26 21
Gordon Street & V/C 0.39 0.32 0.11 0.29 0.45 0.09 < 0.49 > TCS
Waterloo Avenue/ Q 48 41 15 13 68 7 < 65 > Wilson Street Ex 25 - 35 - - 55 < - >
Avail. -23 - 20 - - 48 < - > LOS A A < A A A A A
Delay 10 10 < 1 1 0 0 1Wilson Street &
V/C 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 Northumberland Street/ TWSC
Q 0 < 0 0 Parking Lot Entrance Ex - < - -
Avail. - < - -LOS A > A A > A < A A A
Delay 10 > 10 0 > 0 < 5 5 2Wilson Street & V/C 0.06 > 0.17 > < 0.02
TWSC Carden Street Q 2 > 0 > < 1
Ex - > - > < -Avail. - > - > < -LOS < B > B < B B B B B > B A A > A B
Delay < 17 > 17 < 16 15 16 15 18 > 18 6 7 > 7 14Wyndham Street & V/C < 0.13 > < 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.35 > 0 .05 0.20 >
TCS
r Carden Street u Q < 15 > < 5 0 6 38 > 2 12 >
o Ex < - > < - 30 20 - > 30 - > Hk Avail. < - > < - 889 889 - > 28 - >
ea LOS C B C B > B A A A B
PM Delay 28 16 22 17 > 17 8 9 9 14
A Norfolk Street & V/C 0.26 0.07 0.51 > 0.22 0.64 TCS
MacDonell Street Q 29 9 43 > 7Ex - 15 - > 45 -
Avail. - 6 - > 38 -LOS < A > A < A > A < B > B < B > B A
Delay < 1 > 1 < 1 > 1 < 12 > 12 < 11 > 11 5MacDonell Street & V/C < 0.00 > < 0.01 > < 0.33 > < 0.01 >
TWSC Wilson Street Q < 0 > < 0 > < 12 > < 0 >
Ex < - > < - > < - > < - > Avail. < - > < - > < - > < - > LOS < C > B < B B B < A > A B B > B B
Delay < 20 15 19 < 17 16 17 < 7 > 7 11 11 > 11 13Wyndham Street & V/C < 0.41 0.02 < 0.26 0.04 < 0.22 > 0 .18 0.19 >
TCS MacDonell Street Q < 44 0 < 27 3 < 6 > 10 21 >
Ex < - 12 < - 15 < - > 35 - > Avail. < - 12 < - 12 < - > 25 - > LOS C C C C B B B B D A A B C E > E C
Norfolk Street/ Delay 25 24 22 24 17 17 16 17 45 8 2 15 21 61 > 59 34Yarmouth Street & V/C 0.26 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.46 0.48 0.02 0.10 0.98 >
TCS Quebec Street/ Q 27 32 13 16 25 5 23 21 0 10 186 > Paisley Street Ex 30 - 20 25 - 25 - - 5 20 - >
Avail. 3 - 7 9 - 20 - - 5 10 - >
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
42
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 11
-
iod
Intersection Control
Type MOE
Direction / Movement / Approach
Per Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Ove
rall
Ana
lysi
s
Left
Thr
oug
h
Rig
ht
Ap
pro
ach
Left
Thr
oug
h
Rig
ht
Ap
pro
ach
Left
Thr
oug
h
Rig
ht
Ap
pro
ach
Left
Thr
oug
h
Rig
ht
Ap
pro
ach
Norfolk Street & Waterloo Avenue/
Wilson Street TCS
LOS C C C C 26
B B A B 14
< C > C 24
C 20Delay 27 26 25 19 14 8 < 24 >
V/C 0.26 0.19 0.11 0.57 0.57 0.07 < 0.65 > Q 33 24 15 19 97 6 < 91 > Ex 25 - 35 - - 55 < - >
Avail. -8 - 20 - - 49 < - >
Wilson Street & Northumberland Street/
Parking Lot Entrance TWSC
LOS A A 10
< A A 1
A A 0
A 2Delay 10 < 1 0
V/C 0.04 < 0.00 0.01 Q 1 < 0 0 Ex - < - -
Avail. - < - -
Wilson Street & Carden Street
TWSC
LOS B > B 11
A > A 0
< A A 7
A 3Delay 11 > 0 > < 7
V/C 0.10 > 0.13 > < 0.04 Q 3 > 0 > < 1 Ex - > - > < -
Avail. - > - > < -
k H
our
Wyndham Street & Carden Street
TCS
LOS < B > B 18
< B B B 15
B B > B 18
A A > A 8
B 13 Delay < 18 > < 16 15 15 18 > 7 8 >
V/C < 0.20 > < 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.32 > 0.06 0.30 > Q < 19 > < 4 0 5 35 > 3 22 > Ex < - > < - 30 20 - > 30 - >
Avail. < - > < - 30 15 - > 27 - >
PM
Pea
Norfolk Street & MacDonell Street
TCS
LOS D B C 28
B > B 16
A A A 10
B 16Delay 38 18 16 > 10 10
V/C 0.66 0.25 0.51 > 0.28 0.63 Q 72 30 36 > 14 65Ex - 15 - > 45 -
Avail. - -15 - > 31 -
MacDonell Street & Wilson Street
TWSC
LOS < A > A 1
< A > A 1
< C > A 0
< B > B 13
A 6Delay < 1 > < 1 > < 19 > < 13 >
V/C < 0.00 > < 0.03 > < 0.50 > < 0.01 > Q < 0 > < 1 > < 22 > < 0 > Ex < - > < - > < - > < - >
Avail. < - > < - > < - > < - >
Wyndham Street & MacDonell Street
TCS
LOS < C B C 24
< C B C 23
< A > A 10
B B > B 12
B 18Delay < 25 16 < 25 16 < 10 > 12 12 >
V/C < 0.60 0.05 < 0.65 0.08 < 0.28 > 0.26 0.30 > Q < 52 2 < 69 10 < 11 > 14 33 > Ex < - 12 < - 15 < - > 35 - >
Avail. < - 10 < - 5 < - > 21 - >
Norfolk Street/ Yarmouth Street &
Quebec Street/ Paisley Street
TCS
LOS C C C C 25
B B B B 18
E B A A 0
C D > D 38
C 27Delay 28 24 23 18 19 18 56 14 8 21 39 >
V/C 0.39 0.21 0.10 0.20 0.31 0.19 0.81 0.60 0.02 0.11 0.83 > Q 34 28 12 20 47 20 57 51 0 10 142 > Ex 30 - 20 25 - 25 - - 5 20 - >
Avail. -4 - 8 5 - 5 - - 5 10 - > MOE - Measure of Effectiveness Q - 95th Percentile Queue Length TCS - Traffic Control Signal RBT - Roundabout LOS - Level of Service Ex. - Existing Available Storage TWSC - Two-Way Stop Control < - Shared Through/Left Delay - Average Delay per Vehicle in Seconds Avail. - Available Storage AWSC - All-Way Stop Control < - Shared Through/Right
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 12
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
3 Development Concept
3.1 Development Description
The proposed parking structure will be located on the existing Wilson Street surface parking lot. It is planned to provide for up to 500 vehicles and secure storage for an additional 60 bicycles.
The garage access has been designed to provide inbound access from Wilson Street into the lower level and from the north via Northumberland Street into Level 2. Outbound trips will be directed out from Level 1 onto Wilson Street and from Level 2 onto Northumberland Street if specified. The analysis will consider eight (8) traffic scenarios:
Scenario 1: Vehicles enter via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street will continue to operate one-way northbound from Norfolk Street/Gordon Street to Northumberland Street.
Scenario 2: Vehicles enter via one lane from Wilson Street and two lanes from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street will continue to operate one-way northbound from Norfolk Street/Gordon Street to Northumberland Street.
Scenario 3: Vehicles enter via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street and one lane onto Northumberland Street. Wilson Street will continue to operate one-way northbound from Norfolk Street/Gordon Street to Northumberland Street.
Scenario 4: Vehicles enter via one inbound lane from Wilson Street and one inbound lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation will be reversed to southbound flow only from Northumberland Street to Norfolk Street/Gordon Street.
Scenario 5: Vehicles enter via one lane from Wilson Street and two lanes from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation will be reversed to southbound only from Northumberland Street to Norfolk Street/Gordon Street.
Scenario 6: Vehicles enter one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street and one lane onto Northumberland Street. Wilson Street operation will be reversed to southbound only from Northumberland Street to Norfolk Street/Gordon Street.
Scenario 7: Vehicles enter via one lane from Wilson Street and one lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 13
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Wilson Street. Wilson Street one-way northbound-only operation will be extended to MacDonell Street.
Scenario 8: Vehicles enter via one inbound lane from Wilson Street and one inbound lane from Northumberland Street. Vehicles exit via two lanes onto Wilson Street. Wilson Street operation will be reversed to southbound-only from MacDonell Street to Norfolk Street/Gordon Street.
Figure 3.1 illustrates the proposed site plan of Level 1 for existing northbound operation on Wilson Street (Scenario 1-3 and Scenario 7). We note that the Site plan for Scenario 4-6 and Scenario 8 was not available at the time of writing this report.
3.2 Entrance/Exit Sight Distance
Sight distance measurements were taken at the proposed site driveway connection to Wilson Street. The main measurements were taken from a point five metres from east of the centerline of the driveway (the rear of an entering vehicle turning into the driveway) with a target at a height of 0.38 metres (the lowest legal height of a taillight) along a line of sight to the furthest point in the respective direction at 1.05 metres above the pavement (the height of a driver’s eye).
The TAC Manual Chapter 2.3 (Intersections), Section 2.3.3.4 (Decision Sight Distance)1 states that the sight distance for a minor road with stop control should be “distance traveled in 3 seconds at design speeds to decision sight distance” (Table 2.3.3.4)2. For a driveway connection to a public roadway, it is recommended that at the least, the minimum stopping sight distance should be provided since it exceeds the distance traveled in 3 seconds by a vehicle traveling at design speed.
In order to determine if adequate sight distance will be available for the site driveway connection to Wilson Street, a design speed of 60 kilometres per hour (10 kilometres per hour over the posted speed limit) was used for analyses purposes. Based on a 60 kilometre per hour design speed, the following sight distances apply:
Distance traveled in 3 seconds: 50 metres
Minimum stopping sight distance: 85 metres
Minimum decision sight distance: 170 metres
Desirable decision sight distance: 235 metres
A sight distance measurement was taken toward the south at the proposed driveway connection to Wilson Street and was determined to be approximately 88 metres which meets the minimum stopping sight distance. However, the turning decision sight distance for vehicles leaving the site is
1 TAC Manual, page 2.3.3.12 2 TAC Manual, page 2.3.3.13
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 14
http:2.3.3.13http:2.3.3.12
-
only 55 metres which does not meet the TAC minimum requirements for safe stopping sight distance (85 m). This poses a significant potential conflict as traffic exiting the garage will not have sufficient distance to determine whether a safe gap exists to enter Wilson Street.
A sight distance measurement was taken toward the north at the proposed driveway connection Wilson Street and was determined to be in excess of a 120 metres to the end of Wilson Street at MacDonell Street. This distance meets the minimum stopping sight distance criteria but does not meet the minimum decision sight distance. TAC recommends that at the least, minimum stopping sight distance is provided.
If northbound flow on Wilson Street is maintained, the placement of the site entrance does not provide adequate safe stopping distance which could cause potential safety issues. If southbound flow on Wilson Street is introduced, the site entrance would meet TAC minimum sight distances.
In conjunction with the reconstruction of the site, the City is planning to reduce the speed limit on Wilson Street to 30 kilometres per hour and reduce the lane width. This would result in a lower design speed, reducing the stopping sight distance and decision sight distance required for the driveway entrance.
The vehicle trips generated by the proposed parking structure were established using the observed parking generation at the existing Wilson Street lot. The lot contains a mix of permit and ‘Pay and Display’ users. No programming for the future parking structure was provided. Accordingly, it is assumed that the characteristics of the parking structure will be similar to the current lot. During the both AM and PM peak hours, a total of 44 vehicles entered and exited the lot. The existing surface parking lot has 85 stalls, for a trip generation rate of 0.52 trips/stall. The entering and exiting splits were based on the existing surface lot use.
3.3 Development Trip Generation
The new parking structure will provide up 500 stalls. At this level the site is forecast to generate approximately 260 trips during both the AM and PM peak hours. Table 3.1 displays the estimated total trip generation for the proposed parking structure.
TABLE 3.1: ESTIMATED SITE TRIP GENERATION
Land Use
Parking Structure
Stalls
500
AM Peak Hour
Rate
0.52
In
213
Out
47
Total
260
PM Peak Hour
Rate
0.52
In
94
Out
166
Total
260
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 15
-
W
ilson
Stre
et P
arki
ng S
truct
ure
Tran
spor
tatio
n Im
pact
Stu
dy
1605
20
Figu
re 3
.1De
velo
pmen
t Con
cept
Site
Pla
n
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
3.4 Development Trip Distribution and Assignment
The estimated site generated trips were assigned to the roadway network based on the existing distribution of traffic within the study area. The split of traffic in and out of the proposed parking structure were assigned based on the number of lanes in each traffic scenario.
3.4.1 Scenario 1
The trip distribution for Scenario 1 is shown in Table 3.2, Figure 3.2 and Figure 3.3. Figure 3.4 and Figure 3.5 illustrate the resulting site generated traffic assignment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.
TABLE 3.2: ESTIMATED SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR SCENARIO 1
Route Direction AM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound
Carden Street East 1% 2% 0% 0%
Waterloo Avenue West 27% 1% 23% 4%
Norfolk Street/ Gordon Street
North 19% 4% 15% 9%
South 23% 5% 27% 13%
Wyndham Street North 8% 20% 7% 28%
South 6% 7% 1% 11%
MacDonell Street East 11% 58% 19% 29%
Quebec Street/ Paisley Street
East 1% 0% 4% 1%
West 4% 2% 4% 4%
Yarmouth Street North 0% 1% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 17
-
Yarmouth
5%
Gor
don
Str
eet
23%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
27%
0% 0% 23%
0%
1% 5% 0%
Wilson Street
1%
27% 0% 50%
Parking Lot 50
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
6% 0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
100%
100%
100% 100%
50%
0% 0%
0% 100%
0%7%
50%
7%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 6%
22% 22% 13% 2%
50%
78%
22% 2%
6% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 1%
13% 13% 13% 0% 1%
13%
37%
6%
78%
13%
37%
0%
Carden Street 6
% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
37%
Wils
onS
tree
t
6%0% 78%
54%
0% 9% 4%24% 0%0% 0%
0%
13%
0% 65%
13% 1% 11% 24% 24% 0% 65% 65% 11% 58%
0%
0% 7% 0% 10% 6% 13% 13% 13% 13%
20%
0% 24% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
3% 5%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
24%
0% 8%7% 0%
4%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
24%
7%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0%
2% 4% 1% 0%0%
2% 1% 1% 4% 0% 0%
0% 19%
0%
0% Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
19% 1%
4%
0%
Figure 3.2
AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 1
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.3
13%
Gor
don
Str
eet
27%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
23%
0% 0% 27%
0%
4% 13%
0%
Wilson Street
4%
23% 0% 50%
Parking Lot 50
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
17%
0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
100%
100%
100% 100%
50%
0% 0%
0% 100%
0%11%
50%
11%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 1%
31% 31% 20% 0%
50%
69%
31% 0%
1% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 0%
5% 5% 5% 0% 0%
20%
45%
4%
69%
20%
45%
0%
Carden Street 4
% 0%
17%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
45%
Wils
onS
tree
t
4%0% 69%
25%
0% 16%
4%23% 0%0% 0%
0%
32%
0% 37%
22% 1% 19% 23% 23% 0% 37% 37% 12% 29%
0%
0% 15% 0% 18% 17% 32% 32% 22% 22%
28%
0% 23% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
4% 3%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
23%
0% 7%
15% 0%
4%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
23%
15%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭй
4% 9% 1% 1%0%
4% 4% 4% 4% 0% 1%
0% 15%
0%
Ϭй Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
15% 1%
9%
0%
PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 1
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.4
3
Gor
don
Str
eet
49
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
58 0 0 490
0 3 0 Wilson Street
0
58 0 107
Parking Lot 1
07 0W
ilson
Str
eet
107
Nor
folk
Str
eet
3 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
47
107
47 47
107
0 0
0 47
0
3
107
3
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 47 13
10 10 6 1
107 37 10
1
13 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 2
28 28 28 0 2
6
79 1337 6
79 0
Carden Street 1
3 0
3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
79
Wils
onS
tree
t
130 37
26 0 4 2
51 0
0 0 0 6 0 31
28 2 24 51 51 0 31 31 5 28
0 0 3 0 22 3 6 6 28 28
9
0 51
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 6 11
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
51 0 173 0
9
Nor
folk
Str
eet
51 3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0 1 2 0 0
0
1 2 2 9 0 0
0 40 0
0 Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
40 0 2
0
AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 1 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.5
22
Gor
don
Str
eet
25
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
22 0 0 250
6 22 0
Wilson Street
6
22 0 47
Parking Lot 4
7 0W
ilson
Str
eet
47
Nor
folk
Str
eet
28 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
166
47
166 166
47
0 0
0 166
0
18
47 18
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 16
6 0
51 51 33 0
47 115 51
0 0 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 0
4 4 4 0 0
33
43 4115 33
43 0
Carden Street
4 0
28
Nor
folk
Str
eet
43
Wils
onS
tree
t
40 115
42 0 26 7
22 0
0 0 0 53 0 62
21 1 18 22 22 0 62 62 20 49
0 0 25 0 17 28 53 53 21 21
46
0 22
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 4 3 W
yndh
amS
tree
t
22 0 725 0
4
Nor
folk
Str
eet
22 25
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭ 7 14 2 2
0
7 4 4 4 0 2
0 14 0
Ϭ Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
14 2
14
0
PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 1 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
3.4.2 Scenario 2
The trip distribution for Scenario 2 is shown in Table 3.3, Figure 3.6 and Figure 3.7. Figure 3.8 and Figure 3.9 illustrate the resulting site generated traffic assignment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.
TABLE 3.3: ESTIMATED SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR SCENARIO 1
Route Direction AM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound
Carden Street East 0% 2% 0% 0%
Waterloo Avenue West 18% 1% 15% 4%
Norfolk Street/ Gordon Street
North 24% 4% 21% 9%
South 15% 5% 18% 13%
Wyndham Street North 12% 20% 10% 28%
South 9% 7% 2% 11%
MacDonell Street East 14% 58% 24% 29%
Quebec Street/ Paisley Street
East 2% 0% 4% 1%
West 6% 2% 6% 4%
Yarmouth Street North 0% 1% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 22
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.6
5%
Gor
don
Str
eet
15%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
18%
0% 0% 15%
0%
1% 5% 0%
Wilson Street
1%
18% 0% 33%
Parking Lot 33
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
33%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
6% 0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
100%
0%
100% 100%
67%
0% 0%
0% 100%
0%7%
67%
7%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 9%
22% 22% 13% 2%
67%
78%
22% 2%
9% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 0%
18% 18% 18% 0% 0%
13%
49%
9%
78%
13%
49%
0%
Carden Street 9
% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
49%
Wils
onS
tree
t
9%0% 78%
54%
0% 9% 4%32% 0%0% 0%
0%
13%
0% 65%
17% 1% 14% 32% 32% 0% 65% 65% 11% 58%
0%
0% 7% 0% 13% 6% 13% 13% 17% 17%
20%
0% 32% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
4% 8%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
32%
0% 12%
7% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
32%
7%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0%
2% 4% 1% 0%0%
2% 2% 2% 6% 0% 0%
0% 24%
0%
0% Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
24% 1%
4%
0%
AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 2
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.7
13%
Gor
don
Str
eet
18%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
15%
0% 0% 18%
0%
4% 13%
0%
Wilson Street
4%
15% 0% 33%
Parking Lot 33
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
33%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
17%
0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
100%
0%
100% 100%
67%
0% 0%
0% 100%
0%11%
67%
11%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 2%
31% 31% 20% 0%
67%
69%
31% 0%
2% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 0%
7% 7% 7% 0% 0%
20%
60%
5%
69%
20%
60%
0%
Carden Street 5
% 0%
17%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
60%
Wils
onS
tree
t
5%0% 69%
25%
0% 16%
4%31% 0%0% 0%
0%
32%
0% 37%
29% 1% 24% 31% 31% 0% 37% 37% 12% 29%
0%
0% 15% 0% 23% 17% 32% 32% 29% 29%
28%
0% 31% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
6% 4%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
31%
0% 10%
15% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
31%
15%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭй
4% 9% 1% 1%0%
4% 4% 4% 6% 0% 1%
0% 21%
0%
Ϭй Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
21% 1%
9%
0%
PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 2
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.8
3
Gor
don
Str
eet
32
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
38 0 0 320
0 3 0 Wilson Street
0
38 0 70
Parking Lot 7
0 0W
ilson
Str
eet
70
Nor
folk
Str
eet
3 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
47
70
47 47
143
0 0
0 47
0
3
143
3
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 47 19
10 10 6 1
143 37 10
1
19 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 0
38 38 38 0 0
6
105
1937 6
105 0 Carden
Street 19 0
3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
105
Wils
onS
tree
t
190 37
26 0 4 2
69 0
0 0 0 6 0 31
36 2 30 69 69 0 31 31 5 28
0 0 3 0 28 3 6 6 36 36
9
0 69
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 8 17
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
69 0 253 0
13
Nor
folk
Str
eet
69 3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0 1 2 0 0
0
1 4 4 13 0 0
0 52 0
0 Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
52 0 2
0
AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 2 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.9
21
Gor
don
Str
eet
17
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
14 0 0 170
7 21 0
Wilson Street
7
14 0 31
Parking Lot 3
1 0W
ilson
Str
eet
31
Nor
folk
Str
eet
28 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
166
31
166 166
63
0 0
0 166
0
18
63 18
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 16
6 2
51 51 33 0
63 115 51
0 2 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 0
7 7 7 0 0
33
56 5115 33
56 0
Carden Street
5 0
28
Nor
folk
Str
eet
56
Wils
onS
tree
t
50 115
42 0 26 7
29 0
0 0 0 53 0 62
27 1 22 29 29 0 62 62 20 49
0 0 25 0 21 28 53 53 27 27
46
0 29
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 6 4 W
yndh
amS
tree
t
29 0 1025 0
6
Nor
folk
Str
eet
29 25
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭ 7 14 2 2
0
7 4 4 6 0 2
0 19 0
Ϭ Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
19 2
14
0
PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 2 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
3.4.3 Scenario 3
The trip distribution for Scenario 3 is shown in Table 3.4, Figure 3.10 and Figure 3.11. Figure 3.12 and Figure 3.13 illustrate the resulting site generated traffic assignment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.
TABLE 3.4: ESTIMATED SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR SCENARIO 1
Route Direction AM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound
Carden Street East 1% 2% 0% 0%
Waterloo Avenue West 27% 1% 23% 4%
Norfolk Street/ Gordon Street
North 19% 4% 15% 9%
South 23% 5% 27% 13%
Wyndham Street North 8% 20% 7% 28%
South 6% 7% 1% 11%
MacDonell Street East 11% 58% 19% 29%
Quebec Street/ Paisley Street
East 1% 0% 4% 1%
West 4% 2% 4% 4%
Yarmouth Street North 0% 1% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 27
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.10
5%
Gor
don
Str
eet
23%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
27%
0% 0% 23%
0%
1% 5% 0%
Wilson Street
1%
27% 0% 50%
Parking Lot 50
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
6% 0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
100%
100%
100% 67%
50%
0% 33%
0% 67%
0%7%
50%
7%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 6%
22% 22% 13% 2%
50%
78%
22% 2%
6% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 1%
13% 13% 13% 0% 1%
13%
37%
6%
78%
13%
37%
0%
Carden Street 6
% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
37%
Wils
onS
tree
t
6%0% 78%
54%
0% 9% 4%24% 0%0% 0%
0%
13%
0% 65%
13% 1% 11% 24% 24% 0% 65% 65% 11% 58%
0%
0% 7% 0% 10% 6% 13% 13% 13% 13%
20%
0% 24% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
3% 5%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
24%
0% 8%7% 0%
4%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
24%
7%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0%
2% 4% 1% 0%0%
2% 1% 1% 4% 0% 0%
0% 19%
0%
0% Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
19% 1%
4%
0%
AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 3
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.11
13%
Gor
don
Str
eet
27%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
23%
0% 0% 27%
0%
4% 13%
0%
Wilson Street
4%
23% 0% 50%
Parking Lot 50
%0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
17%
0%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
100%
100% 50%
50%
100% 50%
0% 50%
0%11%
50%
11%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
100% 1%
31% 31% 20% 0%
50%
69%
31% 0%
1% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 0%
5% 5% 5% 0% 0%
20%
45%
4%
69%
20%
45%
0%
Carden Street 4
% 0%
17%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
45%
Wils
onS
tree
t
4%0% 69%
25%
0% 16%
4%23% 0%0% 0%
0%
32%
0% 37%
22% 1% 19% 23% 23% 0% 37% 37% 12% 29%
0%
0% 15% 0% 18% 17% 32% 32% 22% 22%
28%
0% 23% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
4% 3%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
23%
0% 7%
15% 0%
4%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
23%
15%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭй
4% 9% 1% 1%0%
4% 4% 4% 4% 0% 1%
0% 15%
0%
Ϭй Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
15% 1%
9%
0%
PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 3
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.12
3
Gor
don
Str
eet
49
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
58 0 0 490
0 3 0 Wilson Street
0
58 0 107
Parking Lot 1
07 0W
ilson
Str
eet
107
Nor
folk
Str
eet
3 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
31
107
31 31
107
16 16
0 31
0
3
107
3
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 47 13
10 10 6 1
107 37 10
1
13 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 2
28 28 28 0 2
6
79 1337 6
79 0
Carden Street 1
3 0
3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
79
Wils
onS
tree
t
130 37
25 0 4 2
51 0
0 0 0 6 0 31
28 2 24 51 51 0 31 31 6 27
0 0 3 0 22 3 6 6 28 28
10
0 51
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 6 11
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
51 0 173 0
9
Nor
folk
Str
eet
51 3
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0 1 2 0 0
0
1 2 2 9 0 0
0 40 0
0 Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
40 0 2
0
AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 3 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.13
21
Gor
don
Str
eet
25
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
Waterloo Ave
22 0 0 250
7 21 0
Wilson Street
7
22 0 47
Parking Lot 4
7 0W
ilson
Str
eet
47
Nor
folk
Str
eet
28 0
Wils
onS
tree
t
83
47
83 83
47
47 47
0 83
0
18
47 18
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 16
6 0
51 51 33 0
47 115 51
0 0 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 0
4 4 4 0 0
33
43 4115 33
43 0
Carden Street
4 0
28
Nor
folk
Str
eet
43
Wils
onS
tree
t
40 115
42 0 26 7
22 0
0 0 0 53 0 62
21 1 18 22 22 0 62 62 20 49
0 0 25 0 17 28 53 53 21 21
46
0 22
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 4 3 W
yndh
amS
tree
t
22 0 725 0
4
Nor
folk
Str
eet
22 25
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
Ϭ 7 14 2 2
0
7 4 4 4 0 2
0 14 0
Ϭ Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
14 2
14
0
PM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 3 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Wilson Street Parking Structure | Transportation Impact Study | 160520 | July 2016
3.4.4 Scenario 4
The trip distribution for Scenario 4 is shown in Table 3.5, Figure 3.14 and Figure 3.15. Figure 3.16 and Figure 3.17 illustrate the resulting site generated traffic assignment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively.
TABLE 3.5: ESTIMATED SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR SCENARIO 1
Route Direction AM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound PM Peak Hour
Inbound Outbound
Carden Street East 1% 0% 0% 0%
Waterloo Avenue West 11% 10% 8% 16%
Norfolk Street/ Gordon Street
North 16% 18% 20% 20%
South 44% 43% 32% 43%
Wyndham Street North 7% 2% 10% 3%
South 6% 0% 2% 0%
MacDonell Street East 9% 13% 18% 7%
Quebec Street/ Paisley Street
East 2% 3% 4% 1%
West 4% 6% 6% 9%
Yarmouth Street North 0% 5% 0% 1%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited | Page 32
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.14
Wils
onS
tree
t
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
100%
50
%
0%
43%
Gor
don
Str
eet
44%
47% Wilson Street 10%
43% 100%
Waterloo Ave 0
%44
%0%
0% 0%
10%
11% 11%
Parking Lot
Nor
folk
Str
eet
0%
102%
50%
0%
50%
100% 100%
50%
50%
0% 0%
0%0%
50%
0%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 0% 6%
100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0%
6% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 1%
13% 13% 13% 0% 1%
0%
87%
6%0% 0%
87%
0%
Carden Street 6
% 0%
0%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
87%
Wils
onS
tree
t
6%
102% 0%
13%
0% 0% 0%77% 0%32%
70% 15%
0% 0% 0%
10% 1% 9% 92% 92% 0% 15% 15% 2% 13%
0%
0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 10% 10%
2%
0% 22% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
2% 5%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
22%
0% 7%
32% 0%
4%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
22%
32%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0%
6% 18%
5% 3%0%
6% 2% 2% 4% 0% 3%
0% 16%
0%
0% Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
16% 5%
18%
0%
AM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 4
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.15
43%
Gor
don
Str
eet
32%
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
16% 43% 100% 8% 8%
Waterloo Ave
0%
0% 32%
Parking Lot
100%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
0%
81%
0% 0%
41% Wilson Street 16%
Wils
onS
tree
t
50%
0%
50%
100% 100%
50%
0% 0% 0%
50%
0%0%
50%
50%
0%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 0% 2%
100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0%
2% 0%
0%
0% Carden Street 0% 0%
10% 10% 10% 0% 0%
0%
90%
8%0% 0%
90%
0%
Carden Street 8
% 0%
0%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
90%
Wils
onS
tree
t
8%
81% 0%
7%
0% 0% 0%70% 0%31%
50% 10%
0% 0% 0%
20% 2% 18% 80% 80% 0% 10% 10% 3% 7%
0%
0% 0% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 20% 20%
3%
0% 30% MacDonell
Street 0% 0% 0%
0%
4% 6%
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
30%
0% 10%
31% 0%
6%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
30%
31%
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0%
9% 20%
1% 1%0%
9% 4% 4% 6% 0% 1%
0% 20%
0%
0% Quebec Street 0%
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
20% 1%
20%
0%
PM Peak Hour Site Trip Distribution Scenario 4
Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.16
20
Gor
don
Str
eet
94
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
5 20 47 23 23
Waterloo Ave
0 0 94
Parking Lot
47
Nor
folk
Str
eet
0 139
0 0 22 Wilson Street 5
Wils
onS
tree
t
107 0
107
47 47
107
0 0 0
107
0
0
107
107
0
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 0 13
213 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 13 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 2
28 28 28 0 2
0
185
130 0
185 0 Carden
Street 13 0
0
Nor
folk
Str
eet
185
Wils
onS
tree
t
13139 0
6 0 0 0
164 015
124 7 0 0 0
21 2 19 171 171 0 7 7 1 6
0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 21 21
1
0 47
MacDonell Street
0 0 0 0 4 11
Wyn
dham
Str
eet
47 0 1515 0
9
Nor
folk
Str
eet
47 15
Nor
folk
Str
eet
Pri
vate
D
rive
way
Paisley Street
0 3 9 2 1
0
3 4 4 9 0 1
0 34 0
0 Quebec Street 0
Street
Nor
folk
Str
eet
34 2 9
0
AM Peak Hour Site Generated New Trips
Scenario 4 Wilson Street Parking Structure Transportation Impact Study 160520
-
Yarmouth
Figure 3.17
71
Gor
don
Str
eet
30
Northumberland Street/Parking Lot
Entrance
27 71 166 7 7
Waterloo Ave
0 0 30
Parking Lot
166
Nor
folk
Str
eet
0 105
0 0 68 Wilson Street 27
Wils
onS
tree
t
47 0
47
166 166
47
0 0 0
47
0
0
47 47
0
Wyn
dham
Str
eet 0 2
94 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0
0 0 Carden Street 0 0
10 10 10 0 0
0
84 80 0
84 0
Carden Street
8 0
0
Nor
folk
Str
eet
84
Wils
onS
tree
t
8105 0
12 0 0 0
65 051 54
17 0 0