wimax and 3gpp lte - télécom...

25
Mobile Communications Research CCSR WiMAX and 3GPP LTE How are they related? How are they related? Professor Rahim Tafazolli Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR), University of Surrey (UK) [email protected] EW 2007 1 st -4 th April

Upload: dangcong

Post on 21-Feb-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Mobile CommunicationsResearchCCSR

WiMAX and 3GPP LTEHow are they related?How are they related?

Professor Rahim Tafazolli

Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR), University of Surrey (UK)[email protected]

EW 20071st - 4th April

2 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Outline of PresentationOutline of Presentation

WiMAX & LTE salient features

Air-Interface

Network Architectures

Identify some major research issues

Answer the question “ how are they related”

3 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX BasicsBasicsBasic WiMAX

Designed for speeds up to ~70 Mb/sOFDM, OFDMAData-centric

Realities of NLOS propagation30 miles >>> 2 miles70 Mbps >>> few Mbps

3G: High-Speed Downlink Packet Access

Frequencies

--Rysavy Rsch

Codes

HSDPA

OFDMA

WAN

WAN

MAN

Domain

1-5 milesUp to 2.4 Mbps

CDMA2000 1x EV-DO

1-5 milesUp to 10 Mbps

WCDMA/UMTS HSDPA

1 – 3 miles

Up to 30 Mbps

WiMAX(802.16e)

RangeThrput

3G

•Optimization for data vs optimization for voice•MAN + Handover + Roaming = WAN?

4 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX featuresfeatures

ScalabilityScalable PHY for capable of 1.25-20 MHz.Flexible frequency re-use schemes for network planning

High Data RatesLarger MAC frames with low overheadAdaptive modulationH-ARQ for reducing packet lossFull MIMO and Beamforming

QOSTraffic types Adaptive Modulation & CodingARQH-ARQ

MobilitySecure Optimized Hard HandoverFast BS Switching HandoverPower Management with Sleep and Idle modes

5 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX: : OFDMA TDD Frame StructureOFDMA TDD Frame Structure

Flexible subchannelizationPseudo-random permutation for diversityContiguous permutation for selectivity

Operation in varying channel widths

1.25 MHz, 2.5, 5, 10, 15 and 20 MHz channels

Diversity permutationDownlink FUSCDownlink PUSCUplink PUSC

Contiguous permutationDownlink Band AMCUplink Band AMC

6 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX--Power ControlPower Control

Open loop power controlUL interfenrece+noise level broadcasted in DL MapPath loss estimate based on channel reciprocityPower offset based on ACK/NACKFast power control (by UL-MAP )

Close loop power controlPower adjustment sent in DL power controlPower adjust in 0.25dB step

Power adjustment by periodical ranging

7 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX FeaturesFeatures

Tradeoff between link robustness and capacityAdaptation on a burst by burst basis

Modulation formats:BPSKQPSK16QAM64 QAM

8 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Advanced Antenna SystemAdvanced Antenna System

AAS (beamforming)Space time code (STC)Spatial multiplexing (SM)Adaptive MIMO switch (AMS)Space Time Block Codes and Spatial multiplexingCollaborative Spatial Multiplexing (CSM)Dynamic band allocation for AMC sub-carrier mapping

9 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

WiMAXWiMAX

Modulation: BPSK, QPSK, 16 QAM, and 64 QAM.

Bit Detection:Soft-input soft-bit de-mapper based on MAP criterionMRC combining for multiple Rx antenna (if STBC is switched off)

FEC coding: convolutional tail biting code (CCTB), convolutionalzero padded (CCZP), convolutional turbo code (CTC), and Low Density Parity Check (LDPC)CCTB,CCZP, and CTC Rates: 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 5/6 (through puncturing)LDPC rates: 1/2, 2/3, and 3/4

Repetition Coding

10 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Throughput, Cell Range, QualityThroughput, Cell Range, Quality

0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000

2

4

6

8

10

12

14x 10

5 User average throughput v.s. distance

Distance (m)

Thro

ughp

ut (b

ps)

WiMaxHSDPA

7 0 8 0 90 1 00 110 120 130 1400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1C DF o f pa ck e t d ela y

P ac k e t de lay (n u m b e r of fra m e s )

Cum

ulat

ive

dist

ribut

ion W iM ax

HSD P A

11 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Capability Evolution

Typ

ical

ran

ge (

km) 30

0.1

1

10

GSMGPRS

EGPRSUMTS

HSPA

0.01 0.1 1 10

802.11a

802.16

802.11b

“Super3G”“LTE”

Drive performance and efficiencybeyond today’s limits (performance/cost ratio)

Typical user rate (Mbps)

12 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

3G LTE3G LTE-- MotivationMotivation

Continuous growth of Mobile Communications-towards Broadband personal communications

Higher capacityReduced delayHigher data ratesAutomatic planning capabilitySimplified network managementAlways onMulti/Broadcast capability

13 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

LTE SpecificationsLTE Specifications

Data Rates:30Mbps(UL), 100Mbps (DL)Speed: walking to bullet train

High performance/cost ratioSpectral efficiency target 5bps/Hz

Reduced latencyTTI latency <0.5msInteractive gaming, VoIP

Optimised for packet switchingPS onlyIP routing (CN & RAN)Better support of VoIP, Data

Cost efficient deploymentRe-use of 3G/2G spectrumBandwidth flexibility (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20MHz)Minimum network operation cost

14 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

PHY layer Key TechnologiesPHY layer Key Technologies

Downlink-OFDMUplink-Single Carrier FDMAMultiple antenna techniques for high capacityInter-cell interference mitigationMulticast and Broadcast servicesChannel Frequency & Time domains exploitation for rate and/or power adaptation

15 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

DownlinkDownlink

• OFDMA (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20MHz)

• Sub-frame duration: 0.5ms

• Sub-carrier spacing: 15KHz

• FFT size –Occupied Sub-carriers: 128-76(1.25MHz), 256-151, 512-301, 1024-601, 1536-901, 2048-1201

• NUM. OFDM Symbols per sub-frame:7 (with short CP)6 (with long CP)

16 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

UPLINKUPLINK

Power-efficient CoverageLow peak-average power ratioLow power consumption by UESupporting wide area coverage

Support scalable bandwidth and flexible scheduling

FDMA

Similar frame structure as downlinkFlexible Cyclic prefix (CP) structure

Orthogonality among uplink users, Cyclic prefix to account for relative timing difference

17 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Advanced Antenna SystemAdvanced Antenna System

Single data stream per userBeamforming

Coverage, longer battery life

Spatial Division Multiple Access (SDMA)Multiple users in same radio resource

Multiple data stream per userDiversity

Link robustness

Spatial muliplexingSpectral efficiency, high data rate support

18 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Diversity and MultiplexingDiversity and Multiplexing

Basic 2 Tx, 2RxSpatial multiplexing

Different modulation/coding per streamMultiuser MIMOClosed loop with feedback

Spatial diversityOpen loop transmit diversity

» Cyclic delay diversity» Space time coding

Closed loop transmit diversity» Beamforming» Antenna selection

19 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Interference MitigationInterference Mitigation

ObjectiveOne cell freq. re-use for simplified planning

ProblemsCell edge users suffer interference from neighbouring cells

Possible solutionsInter-cell interference randomisationInter-cell interference cancellationInter-cell interference co-ordination

20 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

InterInter--cell Interference Mitigationcell Interference Mitigation

Inter-cell Interference RandomizationCell-specific interleaved division multiple access (IDMA)

» Interleaving pattern depends on cell-IDFrequency hopping

Inter-cell Interference cancellationSpatial suppression by beamformingInterference cancellation with IDMA

Inter-cell Interference CoordinationFlexible Soft Freq. re-use (SFR)

» Primary and secondary freq. bands» Primary band: reuse > 1, higher TX power» Secondary bands: Remainng spectrum» Cell-edge users: Use primary band good SIR» Cell-centre users: use entire band high data rates

Supported by means of frequency domain scheduling

21 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

LTE System ArchitecturesLTE System Architectures4X44X4

4 protocol optionsGTP-U tunneling based mechanismGTP-U Tunneling + MIP based mechanismGTP-U Tunneling + PMIP based mechanismPure MIP based mechanism

4 Packet Core Architecture OptionsOption 1 (Full Split)Option 2 (Traditional SGSN/GGSN like)Option 3 (Combined User Plane Node)Option 4 (All in One)

22 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

SAE Evolved Packet Core SAE Evolved Packet Core Architecture OptionsArchitecture Options

S6

UPE S5b

S5cMME S5aS1a

S1b

S2

S3

Inter ASAnchor

S4

S2

S7

Gi

Option 1 (“Full Split”):S3a

MME/UPE

S5

S1

S2

S3

Inter ASAnchor

S4

S2

S7

S6

Gi

Option 2 (“Traditional SGSN/GGSN-like”):

MMES5d

Inter ASAnchor/

UPE

S1c

S1d

S2 S2

S6S3 S4

Gi

S7

Option 3 (“Combined User Plane Node”):

MME/ UPE / Inter AS AnchorS1

S2 S2

S6

S7S3

Gi

S4

Option 4 (“All in One”):

23 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

InterInter-- SAE LTE mobilitySAE LTE mobility

Source MME/UPE

Target MME/UPE

Source Evolved RAN

HSS

UE handoff

Source LTE/SAE Network

Target LTE/SAE Network

Inter Access System Anchor

Target Evolved RAN

IP Network

24 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

Research IssuesResearch Issues

• Minimum capacity per user similar to xDSL (8Mbps)• Capacity at cell edge

Interference mitigation schemesIntelligent schedulers

• Self-optimisation and planningA multidimensional and multivariable problemPositioning technique

• Multihop communications• Wireless Mesh Backhaul• Evaluation of Network architecture options

Mobility management (fast vertical handover)QoS, SecurityIP to e-Node BScalabilityCross-cells resource management and self-organised network operation

• Always on and end-to-end delay optimisation

25 Mobile CommunicationsResearch

How are they related?How are they related?

Not relatedLTE is an e-2-e system whereas WiMAX is an Radio Access technology WiMAX should be considered as 2nd Generation of Wireless LAN

Wifi with mobilityGood solution for Fixed operators enter mobile business

3GPP LTE is a step towards 4G Cellular system, ITU-R IMT-AdvanceLooking at AI options, LTE is much simpler whereas WiMAXhas many options but not necessary leading in significant performance difference

LTE addresses main concerns of cellular operators with backward compatibility, enhancing performance/cost ratio through self-organisation and network management