wind turbine final report kristina monakhova – program manager elizabeth yasuna – executive...

16
Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud – Technical Lead EAS 140 D2-E, Zack Bauer, Nikita Ranjit Goraksha WindTER – Wind Turbine Energy Resources

Upload: gary-carpenter

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Wind Turbine Final Report

Kristina Monakhova – Program ManagerElizabeth Yasuna – Executive DirectorDominick Farina – Business DevelopmentKyle Zalud – Technical Lead

EAS 140 D2-E, Zack Bauer, Nikita Ranjit Goraksha

WindTER – Wind Turbine Energy Resources

Page 2: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Project Objectives

Purpose: Design efficient wind turbines for small and large scale applications

Goals: •Build and improve a wind turbine•Strive for continuous improvement•Create a scientific foundation for

future improvements/innovations•Focus on simplcity and reliability

Source: http://learn.kidwind.org/sites/default/files/windturbinebladedesign.ppt

Page 3: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Background Research - Design Factors for Wind Turbines

•Number of blades•Angle of blades•Shape of blades•Blade Twist•Blade Length•Blade materials

•Generator•Gear ratios•Oil/Lubricant used•Height of tower•Rotational Speed

Page 4: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Initial Build - Design

•Blades▫ 3▫ Balsa wood material▫ Flat▫ Roughly 30° tilt▫ Attached to single

wooden dowel with duct tape

•Gears: largest and smallest•Base: provided, no

support structure

Page 5: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Initial Build - Performance

max Voltage: 3.78Vmax Current: 7mAmax Power: .026W

Bulb used: LED (lit)

Page 6: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Overview of Design RationaleDesign Factor Possible Influences on Performance Configurations for Experimentation

Real World Testable in Model

Research Physical Law Exp. 1 – Blade shape

Exp. 2 - # of blades

Exp. 3 – Blade Angles

Exp. 4 – Type of Blades

Number of blades

yes More = greater weight, solidity less speed, more torquefewer more speed, less inertia

Solidity = # of blades * area of blade / total swept area

Baseline (3) 2, 3, 4 Baseline (3) Baseline (3)

Angle of Blades

yes Affects angle of attack – certain tilt to capture more wind

Lift to Drag Ratio=(blade area)(net pressure)/(.5xDrag coefficient × mass density×area×velocity2),

Baseline (30) Baseline level (30)

0, 15, 30, 45 Baseline (15)

Shape of blades

yes Narrower at ends, airfoil shape to maximize lift and minimize drag

Lift to Drag Ratio=(blade area × net pressure)/(1/2 ×Drag coefficient × mass density×area×velocity^2

Rectangular, air foil

Baseline level (air foil)

Baseline (air foil

Baseline (air foil)

Blade twist yes Twisted down length to maintain angle of attack

Lift to Drag Ratio=(blade area)(net pressure)/(.5xDrag coefficient × mass density×area×velocity2),

Baseline level (none)

Baseline level (none)

Baseline level (none)

Baseline level (none)

Blade length

yes Longer blade increases swept area, but increase weight

Lift to Drag Ratio=(blade area)(net pressure)/(.5xDrag coefficient × mass density×area×velocity2), Power in wind : P=.5ρ(Πr2)v3

Baseline level Baseline level

Baseline level Baseline level (some variation)

Blade material

yes Lighter = accelerate rapidly, heavier = more stable

Rotational Inertia, I=.5mr2 , I = 1/12 ML2 +M(L/2)2

Basswood Balsa wood

Balsa wood Balsa wood, posterboard, corrugated plastic, basswood

Gear ratio yes Larger gear ratio = more speed, less torque, more resistive torque

Ressitive Torque = force × Radius, rotational speed transfer: rlωl=rsωs

Baseline (largest)

Baseline (largest)

Baseline(largest)

Baseline (largest)

Generator no

Tower Height no

Page 7: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Experiments – Blade Shape

Configurations: Rectangular, Air foil

Conclusions: Airfoil – maximize lift, minimize drag

Rectangular

Airfoil

Experiment 1 - Blade ShapeConfigurations: Bulb: LED Motor: B1 Fan Distance: 8ft

3 blades, 30 degrees, balsawood, large gear ratio

ShapeMax Voltage (V)

Max Current (mA)

Power (W) RPM

Cut-in Time (s)

Rectangular 3.03 17 0.05151 80 3.5

Airfoil 3.3 20 0.066 100 3.5

Page 8: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Experiment - Number of blades

Configurations:

Aa

Aa Aa

Conclusions: 2 blades

2 blades 3 blades 4 blades

Experiment 1 - Number of Blades

Configurations: Bulb: LED Motor: B1 Fan Distance: 8ft

30 degrees, large gear ratio, balsawood blades, rectangular shape

Number of Blades

Max Voltage (V)

Max Current (mA)

Power (W) RPM

Cut-in Time (s)

2 3.3 30.7 0.10131 110 33 2.8 25.7 0.07196 102 3.54 2.1 15.0 0.0315 98 4

3 blades

Page 9: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Experiment - Angles of Blades

Conclusion: 15° is optimal

Configurations: 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 45 °

0° 15°

Top View

Side View

Experiment 2 - Blade AngleConfigurations: Bulb: LED Motor: B1 Fan Distance: 8ft

2 blades, balsawood blades, large gear ratio, rectangular shape

Angle (degrees)

Max Voltage (V)

Max Current (mA) Power (W) RPM

Cut-in Time (s)

0 0 0 0 0 15 3.3 34.1 0.11253 81 330 2.95 19 0.05605 85 345 2.8 2.3 0.00644 49 3.5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

Power vs. Blade Angles

Blade Angles

Pow

er (W

)

Page 10: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Experiments – Blade Material

Configurations:

Balsawood

Posterboard

Basswood

Corrogated Plastic

Conclusions: basswood – more inertia

Experiment 3 - Blade MaterialConfigurations: Bulb: LED Motor: B1 Fan Distance: 8ft

3 blades, 15 degrees, large gear ratio, airfoil shape

MaterialMax Voltage (V)

Max Current (mA)

Power (W) RPM

Cut-in Time (s)

Balsawood 2.8 18 0.0504 81 3.5Posterboard 2 2.2 0.0044 92 3

Corrugated Plastic 2.3 1.6 0.00368 90 3Basswood 3.03 17 0.05151 80 3.5

Page 11: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Final Improved Design

•Blades▫ 3▫ Bass wood material▫ Flat▫ Roughly 15° tilt▫ Attached to single wooden

dowel with wood glue and duct tape

•Gears: largest and smallest•Base: duct tape and poster board

support structure

Page 12: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Final Improved Design – Rationale and Innovations*

•Blades – Basswood *▫ Heavier▫ Longer▫ 15° tilt

•Base*▫ stability

Page 13: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Results - Final Testing

•2.05Ws•3V, .02A•160rpm

Calculated Values:•Power in wind: 2.7 W•Turbine Efficiency:

▫ Relative to power available in wind : 2.2%

▫ Relative to power available at blades: 3.75%

•Rotational Speed of high speed shaft: 1011rpm

Page 14: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Interpretations of results

•Successful:▫ Very consistent voltage▫ Fairly consistent current/power▫ Kept on spinning after 60s

•Unsuccessful▫ Low current and power▫ High cut-in time

Source: http://learn.kidwind.org/sites/default/files/windturbinebladedesign.ppt

•Why?▫ Blades too long – larger than fan diameter▫ Blades too heavy▫ No twist to blades▫ Unbalanced▫ Tip-Speed Ratio: 3.5

Page 15: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Future Research

•Blade twist from root to tip•Curved Hub to guide wind to

blades•Different blade lengths for

variable wind speeds•Different blade widths

curved

Too long Too shortOptimal

Page 16: Wind Turbine Final Report Kristina Monakhova – Program Manager Elizabeth Yasuna – Executive Director Dominick Farina – Business Development Kyle Zalud

Questions?