winemaking decisions and wine composition: overview linda f. bisson department of viticulture and...

31
Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Upload: lisa-stafford

Post on 24-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: OverviewLinda F. BissonDepartment of Viticulture and EnologyUniversity of California, Davis

Page 2: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

EVERYTHING YOU DO HAS AN IMPACT

Page 3: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice and Wine Processing

• Pre-fermentation Processing• Fermentation Management• Post-fermentation Processing• Aging

Page 4: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Pre-Fermentation Processing

• Harvest Decisions• Crushing• Pressing• Temperature of each• Sulfite addition• Inoculation strategy• Microbial bioloads

Page 5: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Treatments• Skin contact • Cold Soak• Clarification• Additions• Adjustments

Page 6: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Skin Contact• Allowing juice to remain in contact

with skins and seeds• Increases extraction of material from

skins• Increases astringency• May be done at varying temperatures• Will occur during pressing operation

Page 7: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Cold Soak

• Cold Soak: holding red must at low temperatures for an extended period of time prior to fermentation to increase extraction of components

• Impacts microbial flora

Page 8: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Clarification• Removal of suspended particles in

juice• Can facilitate downstream processing• May be removing needed yeast

nutrients (over-clarifying)

Page 9: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Clarification• Natural (Gravity) Settling:

• Rack Juice from lees: results in loss of volume

• Batch and Continuous Drainers• To separate juice from solids • Control size of particles removed

• Centrifugation• Can lead to aeration of wine• May strip too many solids

Page 10: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Clarification• Filtration

• Juice may be difficult to filter• Flotation

• Use of fine suspension of gas (nitrogen) bubbles

• Suspended pulp becomes attached to bubbles and floats to surface allowing removal

Page 11: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Additions• Nutrient additions

• Direct impacts on microbial growth• Indirect impacts on wine chemistry

Page 12: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Additions

• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms

Page 13: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Microorganisms

• Yeast: Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Saccharomyces bayanus: No limit on addition, typically no more than 106 cells/mL.

• Bacteria: Malolactic bacteria, generally Oenococcus oeni: Also no limit on addition, can be as high as 108 cells/mL

Page 14: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions

Page 15: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Enzyme Additions• Amylases: breakdown complex

polysaccharides

• Cellulases: breakdown complex polysaccharides

• Pectinase: breakdown pectins

• Protease: breakdown of proteins

• Glycosidase: release of terpines

Page 16: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Purpose of Enzyme Additions

• Increase yield• Facilitate settling• Release flavors• Prevent wine haze from forming later

in processing

Page 17: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids

Page 18: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Inert Solids

• Settling aids to increase clarification of juice

• Increase solids content to facilitate yeast fermentation

Page 19: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice/Must Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)

Page 20: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Sulfur Dioxide

• Antioxidant: enzymatic• Antimicrobial• Stimulation of yeast• Bleaches red wine color

Page 21: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)• Dimethyl Dicarbonate (DMDC)

Page 22: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)• Dimethyl Dicarbonate (DMDC)• Ascorbic Acid: Antioxidant

Page 23: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)• Dimethyl Dicarbonate (DMDC)• Ascorbic Acid: Antioxidant• Oxygen

Page 24: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Oxygen• Stimulates microorganisms• Required by yeast for optimal ethanol

tolerance• Stimulates oxidation reactions so

oxidation products can be removed early (does not always work!)

Page 25: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Juice Additions• Nutrient additions• Microorganisms• Enzyme additions• Inert solids• Sulfur dioxide (SO2)• Dimethyl

Dicarbonate (DMDC)

•Ascorbic Acid: Antioxidant•Oxygen

•Water

Page 26: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Acidity Adjustment• Increase acidity

• Tartaric and malic acid addition• Ion exchange

• Decrease acidity• Calcium carbonate (not below 6 g/L)• Ion Exchange

• Alter pH• Ion Exchange

Page 27: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Post-Fermentation Operations:

• Clarity • Compositional adjustment• Stability • Style• Packaging

Page 28: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

IF EVERYTHING HAS AN IMPACT, HOW DO YOU DECIDE WHAT TO DO?

Page 29: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Winery Trials

• Needs to be done with your equipment

• Needs to be done with your fruit• Needs to be controlled – meaning you

can reach a solid conclusion• Needs to be evaluated using your

subsequent processing strategy

Page 30: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

The Importance of Controls

• Minimizing number of impact variables

• Isolation of effects• Will dictate what question you are

really answering

Page 31: Winemaking Decisions and Wine Composition: Overview Linda F. Bisson Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis

Today’s Program

• Pressing • Pressure and skin contact

• Oxygen treatment effects• Pre- and during fermentation

• Tannin management