winners losers best_practice_cmmi_v3-3
TRANSCRIPT
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Page 1Document version 3.1
A tale of losers, winners
Losers & Winners
and Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Tale of two project executive
Page 2
• Mandy does not know what is wrong, but does not want to acknowledge it.
• Mandy’s projects stay in trouble.
• Scope continues to creep.
• The project is very late and way over budget.
• Mandy is re-assigned to a less demanding project.
Mandy
Projects that are in trouble
• Jason speaks to his friend at Demix on project management.
• Jason puts requirements change control discipline in place.
• Jason gets control of his project.
• Jason delivers his project, gets the bonus and the next big important project.
Jason
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Tale of two service executive
Page 3
Both have unhappy customers
• Ben tries to offer new products.
• The complaints on poor service increase.
• Ben tries utilizing more staff.
• The complaints increase.
• Ben starts looking for a new job.
Ben
• Jenny speaks to her friend at Demix about Service Delivery.
• Jenny puts service agreements and a simple service request management system in place.
• Jenny controls service requests against commitments.
• The customer satisfaction is increased. Jenny gets the big bonus at the end of the year.
Jenny
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Tale of two CIOs
Page 4
Both have problems with defects in production
• Frans threatens his managers.
• Frans gets resistance from staff and the problems get worse.
• Severe outages in production results.
• Frans is called in with the CEO, COO and HR for a discussion on restructuring!
Frans
• Susan speaks to her friend at Demix about development.
• Susan puts configuration management and peer reviews in place.
• The production defects are significantly reduced.
• Susan is on the shortlist for the next COO.
Susan
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
I adopt
Page 5
Most people want to be ahead, now!
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
From the USA, Carnegie Mellon University, CMMI Institute
for Acquisition (CMMI for Acq)
for Service Delivery (CMMI for Svc)
for Software Development (CMMI for Dev)
People
Internal Audit
Data Maturity
Information Security Secure+
Page 6
Use proven to help you nowBest Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Page 7
• Siemens Information Systems Ltd. reduced its cost of quality from over 45 % to under 30% over a three-year period.
• TATA Consultancy Services saved $4.6 million across all development centres.
• General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems reduced maintenance staff costs by 64% while doubling the size of the organization.
Organisational benefit of
Decreased costs through
• IBM Australia Application Management Services improved account productivity over 20%.
• SAIC System and Network Solutions Group doubled its productivity.• Warner Robins reduced effort to deliver test programs sets by 25%.
Improved productivity through
Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Page 8
• Siemens Information Systems Ltd. reduced defect density an average of 71% in three technical areas.
• IBM Australia Application Management Services closed 95% of problems within the customer-specified time frame.
• Tufts Associated Health Plans decreased software defects identified in testing 25%.
Improved quality through
• General Motors improved the percent of milestones met from 50% to 85%.
• Raytheon North Texas Software Engineering improved schedule performance by 8% with a 50% decrease in variation.
• JPMorgan Chase reduced average slippage of project delivery dates by 70-80%.
Improved on-time delivery through
Organisational benefit of Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Page 9
• Accenture experienced 5 to 1 ROI for quality activities.• Siemens Information Systems Ltd. experienced 2 to 1 ROI over 3 years.• Reuters experienced over 3 to 1 ROI from reducing post-release
defects.
Impressive return on investment through
• Lockheed Martin Management and Data Systems increased their award fees by 55%.
• Siemens Information Systems Ltd. increased their customer satisfaction index an average of 42% in three technical areas.
• Northrop Grumman IT, Defence Enterprise Solutions received more than 98% of possible customer award fees.
Improved customer satisfaction through
Organisational benefit of Best Practice
Best Practice
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Don’t re-invent the wheel
Page 10Losers
Winners adopt
Best Practice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Page 11
Choose to win, use proven best practice
Best Practice
BadPractice
©
Co
pyr
igh
t ©
Dem
ix 2
01
4
Dem
ix B
est
Pra
ctic
e, w
ww
.dem
ix.o
rg
Contact us
Dr Pieter van Zyl - 082 000 0008
www.demix.org
www.facebook.com/mydemix
Page 12
Winners adopt
Best Practice