wipo patent highlights
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 WIPO Patent Highlights
1/2
38
overview oF iP activities
Table 1: Overview of total IP activity (resident activity plus activity abroad) by origin, 2011
Oigin Paens Maks Designs Oigin Paens Maks Designs
China 2 2 1 Belarus (5) 31 74 59
Germany 5 1 2 Colombia 54 46 71
United States of America 3 3 6 United Arab Emirates (4)(5)(6) 68 52 56
France (5)(7) 6 4 4 Malta (6) 64 53 60
Japan (5)(7) 1 10 8 Chile (6) 48 32 100
United Kingdom (6) 7 5 7 Lithuania 75 58 48
Italy 11 6 3 Monaco 75 54 54
Switzerland (6) 8 8 5 Saudi Arabia (5) 44 77 64
Republic of Korea 4 17 10 Iceland 57 76 53
Netherlands 9 9 13 Serbia 66 64 57
Spain 21 7 9 Republic of Moldova 69 73 50
Austria (5)(6) 18 11 12 Egypt (5)(6) 47 92 55
Sweden 13 13 16 Uzbekistan 61 72 62Poland (6) 25 12 11 Sri Lanka (1)(2)(6) 65 69 63
Belgium 17 18 15 Bermuda (4)(5)(6) 73 67 60
Turkey 24 15 14 Barbados (6) 52 82 69
Denmark 15 22 17 Argentina (4)(5)(6) 60 62 82
Canada (6) 12 19 23 Peru (2) 86 48 75
India 14 16 25 Kazakhstan (5)(6) 35 97 78
Russian Federation 10 14 31 Algeria 81 80 52
Finland 16 23 20 Philippines (2)(6) 62 57 95
Australia 19 20 22 Indonesia (5)(6) 49 88 77
Brazil (1)(2)(3) 27 21 29 Bahamas (4)(5)(6) 78 70 67
Czech Republic 36 24 19 Paraguay (1)(2)(6) 94 55 ..
Luxembourg 32 27 24 Panama 88 63 76
Ireland (3)(5) 28 30 27 Mongolia (1)(2) 80 81 72
Portugal 46 25 18 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)(6) 83 59 91
China, Hong Kong SAR 39 29 21 Georgia 72 95 68
Israel (6) 20 45 26 Uruguay (6) 90 68 ..
Norway (5)(6) 23 40 32 Armenia 67 83 88
Ukraine 29 34 38 Seychelles (4)(6) 84 96 65
Romania 40 28 35 Azerbaijan (5) 51 112 86
New Zealand (3) 30 42 33 Ecuador (1)(2)(3) 108 61 81
Mexico 34 26 46 San Marino (4)(5)(6) 89 78 86
Singapore 26 38 43 Jordan 86 75 95
Hungary 38 36 34 Lebanon (4)(5)(6) 92 90 74
Bulgaria 53 31 28 Bangladesh (6) 97 65 95
Greece (1)(3)(5) 41 35 37 Costa Rica (3) 97 66 95
Slovenia (1)(2)(6) 45 39 30 Andorra (4)(6) 101 88 70
Slovakia 50 43 36 Cuba (6) 73 100 ..
Liechtenstein (4)(5)(6) 42 49 39 T F Y R of Macedonia (5) 94 104 65
Cyprus 56 33 42 D.P.R. of Korea (1)(5)(6) 22 144 100
Malaysia (6) 33 50 49 Iran (Islamic Republic of)(4)(5)(6) 79 87 103
South Africa (6) 37 44 51 Bosnia and Herzegovina 92 105 73
Thailand (6) 43 41 58 Mauritius (4)(5)(6) 94 86 ..
Viet Nam 59 37 47 Tunisia (4)(5)(6) 108 79 88
Croatia 55 56 44 Guatemala (2) 124 71 84
Morocco (2) 70 47 40 Qatar (4)(5)(6) 101 85 ..Latvia 58 60 41 Pakistan (5)(6) 77 110 ..
Estonia (6) 63 51 45 Kyrgyzstan (1)(6) 71 118 ..
Note: The rankings are based on total number o applications by origin. Patent data reer to the number o equivalent patent applications. Trademark data reerto the number o equivalent trademark applications based on class count (i.e., the number o classes specifed in applications). Industrial design data reerto the number o equivalent industrial design applications based on design count (i.e., the number o designs contained in applications). D.P.R. o Korea =Democratic People's Republic o Korea. The table reports origins or which at least two types o IP data are available.
(1) 2010 patent data.(2) 2010 trademark data.(3) 2010 industrial design data.(4) Data on patent applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(5) Data on trademark applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(6) Data on industrial design applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(7) Trademark data are estimated.'..' not available
Source: WIPO Statistics Database, October 2012
-
7/29/2019 WIPO Patent Highlights
2/2
39
OvErvIEw Of IP ActIvItIES
Table 2: Overview of resident IP activity by origin, 2011
Oigin Paens Maks Designs Oigin Paens Maks Designs
China 1 1 1 Norway (5)(6) 27 .. 58
Germany 5 4 2 Slovakia 51 43 38
United States of America 3 2 9 Ireland (3)(5) 32 63 40
Japan (5)(7) 2 8 6 Israel (6) 31 59 ..
Republic of Korea 4 9 3 Saudi Arabia (5) 46 .. 44
France (5)(7) 7 3 8 Luxembourg 45 50 41
Italy 9 10 4 Greece (1)(3)(5) 38 74 26
India 10 5 11 Slovenia (1)(2)(6) 43 49 46
Turkey 17 6 5 Croatia 52 51 37
United Kingdom (6) 8 11 10 Colombia 59 31 50
Russian Federation 6 7 16 Uzbekistan 49 52 42
Spain 15 13 7 Philippines (2)(6) 57 40 ..
Canada (6) 16 14 .. Republic of Moldova 66 61 32
Brazil (1)(2)(3) 22 12 12 Sri Lanka (1)(2)(6) 53 55 ..
Netherlands 11 17 20 Algeria 69 58 35
Switzerland (6) 13 21 18 Peru (2) 78 33 55
Poland (6) 18 19 15 Latvia 56 64 47
Australia 25 16 17 Serbia 58 62 51
Ukraine 23 23 14 Mongolia (1)(2) 65 60 49
Sweden 14 25 22 Azerbaijan (5) 55 .. 61
Mexico 34 15 24 Lithuania 66 57 52
Czech Republic 36 22 23 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)(6) 80 41 ..
Belgium 24 30 28 Georgia 63 73 48
Portugal 41 24 19 Cyprus 74 68 43
Austria (5)(6) 19 46 21 Paraguay (1)(2)(6) 87 37 ..
Denmark 20 39 27 Estonia (6) 70 66 53
Romania 30 26 30 Bangladesh (6) 81 45 ..
Finland 21 36 31 Ecuador (1)(2)(3) 92 44 56
Thailand (6) 37 27 .. Armenia 64 69 61Viet Nam 48 20 29 Iceland 68 72 56
Chile (6) 47 18 .. T F Y R of Macedonia (5) 79 .. 54
New Zealand (3) 28 35 39 Costa Rica (3) 88 47 68
South Africa (6) 40 29 .. Panama 83 53 ..
Morocco (2) 61 32 13 Liechtenstein (4)(5)(6) 54 87 64
Malaysia (6) 33 38 .. Uruguay (6) 84 54 ..
Belarus (5) 26 .. 45 Guatemala (2) 92 56 59
China, Hong Kong SAR 60 28 25 Jordan 77 65 69
Hungary 39 42 33 Monaco 82 70 60
Bulgaria 50 34 34 Kyrgyzstan (1)(6) 62 83 ..
Singapore 35 48 36 Bosnia and Herzegovina 75 80 63
Note: The rankings are based on the number o resident applications by origin. Patent data reer to the number o equivalent patent applications. Trademarkdata reer to the number o equivalent trademark applications based on class count (i.e., the number o classes specifed in applications). Industrial design datareer to the number o equivalent industrial design applications based on design count (i.e., the number o designs contained in applications). The table reportsorigins or which at least two types o IP data are available.
(1) 2010 patent data.(2) 2010 trademark data.(3) 2010 industrial design data.(4) Data on patent applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(5) Data on trademark applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(6) Data on industrial design applications at the national IP ofce are not available; however, applications at regional IP ofces are included.(7) Trademark data are estimated.'.. ' not available
Source: WIPO Statistics Database, October 2012