wireless traffic theory and handoff

25
ADVANCE MOBILE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION Dr. Munaf Rashid (cell capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory, Channel assignment strategies, Hand off strategies)

Upload: munaf-rashid

Post on 22-Nov-2014

229 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Cell Capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory, Channel Assignment strategies, Hand off strategies

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

ADVANCE MOBILE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Dr. Munaf Rashid(cell capacity and reuse, Traffic Theory,

Channel assignment strategies, Hand off strategies)

Page 2: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CELL CAPACITY AND REUSE

• Consider a cellular system with s duplex channel• Suppose each cell is allocated with K channels .let

these S channels can be divided among N cells (cluster).

S=KN• If a cluster of N cell is replicated M times in the

system, the total number of duplex channel, C, can

be used as a measure of the system capacity.

C=MKN=MS

Page 3: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CELL CAPACITY AND REUSE

• If a cluster size N is reduced keeping the cell size fixed, more clusters are required to cover the entire area of interest, i.e.,

M C• Smaller N (higher capacity) implies larger

co-channel interference which may results inlow Quality of service (QOS).

Page 4: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DEFINITION OF SOME TERMS

• Setup Time: the time required to allocate the radio channel to a requesting user.

• Blocked call: A call that cannot be completed at the time of request due to congestion (lost call).

• Holding Time: the average duration of typical call• Request Rate: Average number of calls per unit time (ʎ)• Traffic Intensity: Measure of channel time utilization (Erlang)• Load: Traffic intensity across the entire radio spectrum • A channel kept busy for one hour is defined as having a load

of one Erlang.

Page 5: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DEFINITION OF SOME TERMS

• Grade Of Service (GoS) : A measure of congestion which is specified as a probability.

• The Probability of call being Blocked (Erlang B).

• The probability of call being delayed beyond a certain amount of time (Erlang C).

Page 6: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY• Average no of MSs requesting service (request/time)

Average arrival rate= ʎ• Average time for which MS requires service

Average Hold time= T• Offered load a= ʎ T (Erlangs)• E.g, In a cell with 100 MSs on an average 30 requests are generated

during an hour (3600 sec) with average hold time T=360 seconds (6 minutes)

• Then arrival rate ʎ= 30/3600 request/sec.• A channel kept busy for one hour is defined as one Erlang• Offered load

Page 7: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY

• Average arrival rate during a short interval t is given by ʎt .

• Assuming Poison Distribution of service request the probability P(n,t) for n calls to arrive in an interval of length t is given by

• Assuming µ to be the service rate, probability of each call to terminate during interval t is given by µ t.

• Thus probability of given call requires service of each time t or less is given by

Page 8: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY• Probability of arriving call being blocked is

Where S is the number of channels in a group• Probability of an arrival call being delayed is

Where c(s,a) is the probability of an arriving call being delayed with ‘a’load and ‘s’ channels.

Erlang B formulae

Erlang C formulae

Page 9: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY

Page 10: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

TRAFFIC THEORY (Example 1)

• Consider a cell with – S=2 channels– 100 mobile stations – Generating on an average 30 requests/hour– Average holding time T=360 seconds (6 minutes) Load a= (30 × 6)/60 = 3 ErlangsBlocking Probability B(S , a)=0.53Total number of rerouted calls =30 × 0.53=16Efficiency =3(1-0.53)/2=0.7

Page 11: Wireless traffic theory and handoff
Page 12: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

ERLANG B SYSTEM

Page 13: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 2)• Consider a system with

– 100 cells – Each cell has S=20 channels– The users average ʎ=2 calls/hour– The average duration of each call (T) is 3 min– How many number of users can be supported if the

allowed probability of blocking is 2%?• From Erlang B chart total carried traffic=13 Erlangs• Traffic Intensity per user= ʎT=0.1 Erlangs• Total number of isers that can be supported per cell =

13/0.1=130 users/cell.• Total number of users that can be supported =13,000

Page 14: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 3)• Consider another system with

– 100 cells – Each cell has S=20 channels– The users average ʎ=2 calls/hour– The average duration of each call (T) is 3 min– How many number of users can be supported if the

allowed probability of blocking is 0.2%?• From Erlang B chart total carried traffic=10 Erlangs• Traffic Intensity per user= ʎT=0.1 Erlangs• Total number of users that can be supported per cell =

10/0.1=100 users/cell.• Total number of users that can be supported =10,000

Page 15: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Traffic Theory (Example 4)• Consider a systems with:

– Total number of channels= 20– Probability of blocking constraint=1%

Approach 1: Divide 20 channels in 4 Trunks of 5 channelsTraffic capacity for one trunk (5 channels)=1.36 ErlangsTraffic capacity for four trunks (20 channels)=5.44 Erlangs

Approach 2: Divide 20 channels in 2 trunk of 10 channelsTraffic capacity for one trunk (10 channels)=4.46 ErlangsTraffic capacity for 2 trunk (20 channels)=8.92 Erlangs

Approach 3: Use 20 channels as such Traffic capacity for one trunk (20 channels)=12.00 Erlangs

Allocation of channels has a major impact!Conclusion: It is better to have larger poll or trunk

Page 16: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT STARTEGIES

• A scheme for increasing capacity and minimizing interference is required

• Channel assignment strategies can be classified as either fixed or dynamic.

• The choice of channel assignment strategy impacts the performance of the system how a call is managed when a mobile user is hand off from one cell to another cell

Page 17: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

FIXED CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT

• Each cell is assigned a predetermined set of voice channels.

• Any call attempt within the cell can only be served by the unused channels in that particular cell

• If all the channels in the cell are occupied the call is blocked the user does not get service

• In variation of the fixed channel assignment a cell can borrow channels from it’s neighboring cell if it’s own channels are full

Page 18: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DYNAMIC CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT

• Voice channels are not allocated to different cellspermanently.

• Each time a call request is made , the Bs requesta channel from the Msc.

• Msc allocates the channel to the requested callusing an algorithm that takes into account

• The likelihood of future blocking• The frequency of use of the candidate channels• The reuse distance of the channel and• Other cost functions.

Page 19: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

DYNAMIC CHANNEL ASSIGNEMENT

• To ensure the minimum QoS the Msc only allocates a given frequency if that frequency is not currently in use in the cell, or any other cell which falls within the limiting reuse distance.

• DCA reduces the likelihood of blocking thus increasing the capacity of the system

• DCA strategies requires the Msc to collect the real time data on channel occupancy and traffic distribution on a continuous basis.

Page 20: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF

• When a mobile moves in different cells while the call is in progress the Msc must automaticallytransfer a call to a new channel belonging to the new BS.

• The Hand off operation involves indentifying new base station and the allocation of the voice and control signals associated with the new base station.

• Handoff must be per formed successfully, as infrequently as possible, and must be imperceptible to the user.

Page 21: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF REGIONSignal Strength due to BS i

Signal Strength due to BS j

Pi(x) Pj(x)

By Looking at the variation of Signal Strength from either Base station it is possible to decide on the optimum area where handoff can take place

Minimum receiver

sensitivity

Page 22: Wireless traffic theory and handoff
Page 23: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

Hand Off Region

• Hand off is made when the received signal at theBS falls below a pre-specified threshold.

• In deciding when to hand off it is important toensure that the drop In the signal level is not dueto the momentary fading.

• In order to ensure this the Bs monitors the signalfor a certain period of time before initiating handoff

• The length of the time needed to decide ifhandoff is necessary depends on the speed atwhich the mobile is moving.

Page 24: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

HANDOFF STRATEGIES

• In the first generation Analog cellular system thesignal strength measurement are made by Bs andare supervised by the MSC.

• In the second generation systems that use TDMAtechnology , Mobile Assisted HandOff MAHO areused.

• In MAHO every MS measures the received powerfrom the surrounding BS and continually reportthese values to the corresponding Bs.

• Handoff is initialized if the signal strength ofneighboring BS exceeds that of current BS

Page 25: Wireless traffic theory and handoff

SOFT HANDOFF

• CDMA spread spectrum cellular system providesa unique hand off capability.

• Unlike channelized wireless systems that assignradio channels during a handoff (called hardhandoff) the spread spectrum Ms share the samechannel in every cell.

• The term handoff here implies that a different Bshandles the radio communication task

• The ability to select between the instantaneousreceived signal from different Bs is called softHand off.