InformationThese template sheets come with some scores already entered into cells.These scores act as placeholders and demonstrate what scores are necessary. The only sheets that require any user input is the WISC-IV sheet.All cells, except those requiring entry, are protected. Use the TAB key to move from input cell to input cell.****Be sure to delete any scores that do not pertain to your particular case.****We (Ron Dumont and John Willis) and The Psychological Corporation, take no responsibility for any errors made while using these templates.There may be some differences between some of the templates reporting and data in the WISC-IV Manuals.The Percentiles reported here are simple SS to Percentile lookups. They are based upon the normal curve distribution.The Composite and FSIQ ranges are based upon a formula (SEE, page 37, WISC-IV Technical and Interpretive Manual).Critical Values for subtest differences are approximations - because there are so many subtest combinations available, the template uses the rounded average of all possible critical values. Please refer to page 265, WISC-IV Administration and Scoring Manual for actual values for the 10 core subtestsGf-Gc configurations were adapted from Appendix A, pp. 445 453, The Intelligence Test Desk Reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc Cross-Battery Assessment (McGrew & Flanagan, 1998) and Table 8.3, p. 312, The Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Gf-Gc Theory (Flanagan, McGrew & Ortiz, 2000)

WISC IVWechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition The Psychological Corporation., 2003. All Rights ReservedDumont-Willis WISC-IV Interpretive WorksheetUse the TAB key to navigate to cells requiring inputName:TashaDate of Test:9/14/99Date Analyzed:9/12/00200391520039915Date of Birth:3/5/92Age:7 years, 6 months, 9 days1996367697 years, 6 months, 9 days000months,days124567891011121316182025303545556570758085SUBTESTSssVCIPRIWMPSFull ScalePR0age grpCheck the subtests used in the Full Scale IQ calculation (7 required). Core subtests are those with borders1110.10bd1pVCIPRIfspsiglwmips2220.4sim1v1713551015271533310ds1w4442pcn1pssss55550cd1s6669v1vS V C1BD MR PCn1777160lns1wI V C0BD MR PCmp088825mr1p2psiS I C099937comp1v3PRIS V I0BD PCmp PCn0101010500ss1s3verbalWR V C011(11)063pcn0p2wmS WR C0PCmp MR PCn012(12)075The VCI is based upon the following subtests: S V Cca0s10totalS V WR013(13)084i0vv combo1p combo1cd or ss114(14)091The PRI is based upon the following subtests: BD MR PCna0w15(15)095wr0vSums of Scaled Scores1713101555Process ScoresBlock Design No Time Bonus1698Digit Span Forward1799Digit Span Backward1899.6Cancellation Random1999.9Cancellation Sequenced10.1Longest Digit Forward (raw score)2Longest Digit Backward (raw score)3s12bd11cd15ds13WISC-IV Interpretive Worksheetv16pcn14ss110ln171. Evaluate the Full Scale IQc19mr18ca112a11422ObtainedPercentileConfidencei113pcm111327324SS TotalsIQRankBandswr11514524Verbal Comprehension(17)1005094 - 106Average to Average0.941003.45378053735.6987378866941064Perceptual Reasoning(13)1005094 - 106Average to Average0.921003.90322943216.4403285639410655415Working Memory(10)1005094 - 106Average to High Average0.921003.90322943216.44032856394106Vx=9945Px=6120FSx=8vp diff0Processing Speed(15)1005092 - 108Average to Average0.881004.5726141327.544813317892108v max15p max1115100Full Scale(55)1005096 - 104Average to Average0.971002.5201339254.158220976396104v min2p min1114diff13diff10fs sc diff14v scat0p scat2.311fs scat0.10.42. Is the VCI versus PRI Significantly Different? Note: See Table B.1 for standardization frequency1213fs scat0.414fs scat0.4SignificanceIs there a significant difference?0VCI (100) vs PRI (100) Difference(p < .01)(p < .05)none0points-10 points15 or more110 - 10NO0Because there is no significant differences between the VCI and PRI, explain the meaning of the scales not being significantly different.-1Because there is a significant difference between the VCI and PRI, interpret the FSIQ with caution. Examine further steps.Because there is no significant differences between the VCI and PRI, explain the meaning of the scales not being significantly different.3. Is the VCI versus PRI Difference Abnormally Large? Note: See Table B.2 for standardization frequency12345VCI (100) vs PRI (100) DifferenceSize of Difference needed for abnormalityIs Size of Difference Abnormal?03115191615200 points (V = P)16NOV = PIQ group218181618170Because no abnormal differences are found, determine if the noted differences are interpretable.Because no abnormal differences are found, determine if the noted differences are interpretable.Because an abnormal difference was found, explain the abnormally large VCI vs PRI difference.4. Are the VCI and PRI composites interpretable? Note: See Table B.6 for standardization frequencyA. Is there abnormal VCI scatter?Is there abnormal scatter?Verbal Subtests High-Low DifferenceNormalAbnormal13 points between 5 subtests0 - 56 or moreYESpointsB. Is there abnormal PRI scatter?Is there abnormal scatter?Perceptual Reasoning Subtests High-Low DifferenceNormalAbnormal110 points between 4 subtests0 - 78 or moreYES12Because each answers to A and B was NO, the VCI versus PRI discrepancy is interpretable.pointsBecause an answer to either A or B was YES, the VCI versus PRI discrepancy differences should probably not be interpreted.Because an answer to either A or B was YES, the VCI versus PRI discrepancy differences should probably not be interpreted.5. Determine if the Working Memory Index is interpretable. Note: See Table B.4 for standardization frequencyA. Is there a significant difference between the Core WMI subtests?Is there abnormal scatter?WMI Subtests [ DS (3) LNS (7) ] DifferenceNormalAbnormal44 points0 - 45 or moreNO0pointsThe WMI may be interpreted.6. Determine if the Processing Speed Index is interpretable. Note: See Table B.4 for standardization frequencyA. Is there a significant difference between the Core PSI subtests?Is there abnormal scatter?PSI Subtests [ SS (10) Cd (5) ] DifferenceNormalAbnormal55 points0 - 34 or moreYES1pointsBecause of subtest differences in the PSI, do not interpret PSI.7. Interpret significant strengths and weaknesses.Verbal Comprehension mean9.0based on 5 subtestsPerceptual Reasoning mean6.0based on 4 subtestsFull Scale mean8.0based on 15 subtestsVerbal / Perceptual StatisticsFull Scale StatisticsssCrit. ValueDeviationCrit. ValueDeviationVerbalSimilarities22-7.0w3-6.0w3-13-11wVocabulary62-3.0w3-2.003-10-100Comprehension920.0031.00000100000000Information1324.0s35.0s31311s000000Word Reasoning1526.0s37.0s31311s0000003-13-11wPerceptualBlock Design12-5.0w3-7.0w0-13-11wPicture Concepts42-2.003-4.0w010000Matrix Reasoning822.0030.00310100Picture Completion1125.0s33.000000000000-100WMDigit Span33-5.00Letter-Number Sequence73-1.0000311sArithmetic14036.0s000-10Pr. Spd.Coding53-3.0000010Symbol Search1032.005Cancellation1234.001IDsVACSPCPABDOADsm8. Compare relevant subtest groupings (.05 level of significance)Word Reasoning (15) > Matrix Reasoning (8)7 point significant differencewr/mr2>7significantMatrix Reasoning (8) < Block Design (1)7 point significant differencemr/bd3 Picture Concepts (4)2 point nonsignificant differencesim/pcm2>2nonsignificantInformation (13) > Comprehension (9)4 point significant differencei/c2>4significantDigit Span (3) < Arithmetic (14)11 point significant differenceds/a37significant0Coding (10) < Symbol Search (5)5 point significant differencecd/ss3