with windows facing new seward. saw two (and only at an

B Witnesses

Lou is:

At an apartment on 45I with windows facing New Seward. Saw TWO (and only

two) guys in the parking lot yelling and cursing at each other: one was wearing a

white-T shirt, one with a dark green or black jacket. Thought shooter had dreds,

but couldn’t make an ID from photo lineup. Saw one guy fire five or six shots at

the other guy. When she went to call 911, shooter was still standing in parking lot.

Guy in the white T-shirt limped across the street and fell down. Told police (but

not grand jury) that there was a car separating the two men when the shooter

fired. Shooter was firing over the car at the victim.

Ariel:

Didn’t witness shooting itself — had obscured view from apartment. Saw victim

wearing a white t-shirt run across the road and drop by the dumpster. Also, saw

the shadow of a person in the road (in the middle of 45th) with long hair in a

ponytail. This person was in dark clothes. Couldn’t see if he had a gun. This was

after the shooting.

Carlie:

Didn’t see anything. Saw three people walking East towards Tudor. Couldn’t

describe them — too dark. Heard three voices prior to the shooting and thought

they sounded black. Thought the voices were coming from near a shed at the

back of her property. Lives at 917 E. 45th Court #4. Heard shot or shots, still saw

three people walking and then standing there. Heard one of them say, “luck you,

you tried to kill me.” Heard someone near her bedroom window say, “Let’s get

out of here.” Then heard more shots a few minutes later. [Gi Tr. 85-86] Thought

entire incident occurred within 10 or 15 minutes.

Thought he heard more than one shot, but turned and ran after 1st Was surprised

man in white kept going at the other man.

Yolanda:

Not called as grand jury witness. Heard shot, then arguing, then multiple shots.

Looked out window and saw two black men walking, both in dark clothes. They

were arguing and sounded angry. One was following the other and yelling at him.

Stan:

Lives closer to Parkwood Inn. Can see 45th at an angle from his window. Hears two

rounds of shots. After last shots, saw a man running towards Parkwood Inn.

Thought man was wearing hoodie and had dredlocks. Didn’t see anyone else. Told

grand jury that he heard him say, “I’m not going to jail for this shit.” Initially told

officers the man said, “I don’t want nothing to do with this.”

Gregory H.:

Was with Twali H., Terry B. and Will J. in Room #201. Twali got really drunk on

Gray Goose and started fighting with his girlfriend, striking her and trying to throw

her over the railing. All of them were really drunk. Everyone there had to break

up the fight between Twali and his girlfriend. Twali had a 9 mm. He had it with

him when he left, saying something like, “I’ll just shoot a motherfucker.” Greg H.

and others had to grab the gun from Twali because he was so drunk and fighting

with everyone. Greg H. didn’t know how Twali got the gun back.

Brandy:

Twali’s girlfriend. She drove him to Parkwood Inn. Claims to have seen Terry B.

with a .38 special revolver. Twali got really drunk there. When she suggested they

leave, Twali got physical and pushed her into a wall. Terry broke them up. Terry

i-s?\t

J5’ 0041

INFORMATION.

-“‘I 6., Detective Gilmour and I conducted a recorded Mirandized Interviewters In room #3

on the floor at the time we contacted him and stated he was Ill and needed a trash can, butfwfcti

iwkIi I.127di/2’015 16:11

his cell phone number I placed aI If he knew the man

- - a white t-shirt at theIrt at the time of the’ Incident in the gasjIvJcout somath’ 1 afterthe

ftend H‘ vay.M I told

.d with H after him.

thatl_, ever

00386

_____

SupØerieidIJ OO4.

Anchorage .Pollçe DepartmentImhLB.. stated he did riot know what hapØened 1eV b1use he left I, hi)tNng like. -

- ‘S -that happened tahim.5i J said again that never left the hotel io6tIiur1ng the Incident with H and t afterth4II!. In a55 ys separate ways. B,.RJj1 stated some of the th ngs adoInwre14shlftS’” ard seeed to Indicate that might baa ffie fgr the shooting, .

‘.,,.j- -‘ ;. -j:- iLji

‘I i “v IDeIejved hat the altercation with was about prior to eaiIng for the gastt tâted had “gotten into an atgumeit with his gid’ arid H ad pushed‘iB .B went on to demonstrate the alte,tIon betWeen hO ad iOnt on to,i • had Iefttoöto he store to put some ditaicten ha and A T1Itiit

andthwlt,then e ikedàfrIne’dit1ohs seIdhèwkëdbacktothe hotel and went downstafrs to pay for his room When hs finished pi$ng, 4waiked bacic to room,whlch4s4 heard the shit up the street” and sàtHelca Bf went onto saythkiThad donpoi itl4gg ong, he would have ran away when thÔ came into theOhood.-‘%w

ktold’B — that we had found both of the guns andvvé(e ing to test oth of them at bIj.i askedB to confirm If what he was describing for me Wä, juJ9,aIgih on him. B jjJ jjfeSbr1bedH I running up, onjrnu and them pushing each ir: Hi reach for a weaon in hiswaistband and whenB saw what It was, he caused HQWpto dropthe weapon B deritrated how he pickedu eapon,äp[nted It in HOWARDSWOn whiletelling him to ‘bac up’ H Ij 1 asked him ‘Man, are you goinglo really sh3ot at me? to wbichBAS11Ythrew the gun back In his d1reUon and told H,.....J again tp HbkUp and.’DeteotFie Glimour tcldpJL1 thai the witne”ed L2IIa1Ifl mIng shot at HB TagreOd aneVfà1d3JtWàS What he ‘4élMtra1dd. 8 denIed trying tothátUthe, and cIartdat had shot at H Lfeet -,.

‘ - --

- ,-. - i- i Wc.Mi -- - —‘B • ‘old Detectiveumpur4that he had seen H L.. exhibit similar aggressive behavior when he wasintox cted, and aHiJ( flVootso Intoxicated he ‘6Iked out’, - ,

- ;-__ ‘-DeêdUva Gilmndr áICOd Bull] to describe the gun he had taken from H tdescnibed it asa medium sized eemi-autornatñin handgun. He did not knOw the make or th hiodel. 8J:1 thought thegrIöri’thE weapon warn bIàck..

-

etefróthnar asked B_ If the Nike tennis shoes at the apartment (#2b Lbeloged to him. Lstàédlliti m!ht be. BJ went on to say that the entire evening pdot,48 had been weáHñg thesaHhoes that were currdriuly on his feet- these tennis shoes had a disif WãMipallem that closelymatchdiomê of theshoe impresSions tound near the sh0011rg scene.--

I asked B J again how many warning shots he had fired at HOWARD, and BEAI.EY stated he had fired“two In thI?id at his feet Nothing hit him.’ I asked BEASI.EY If he saw any blood on HOWARD, and hestatedhSliKfrfot.—--,

I aced1jfhe had called (WIWAMS) on the Way back to the apartment BL 1itted thatas he gof apartment heräbout to, but then he bd up’ becaushe ‘needed iIde it to thestore.’ As - Officer Faagau hi had calied 4Sand WILLMS told n”DId’II1JI J hadcalled hkñ biB - ,had with B 1Tthatdcad WILliAMS arØii\I asked B Jfhe told Rvhat had happeifed th he returned to thet. -JWhena& fl statsdattIr he gave the gun back to ,iie was ccncSrned that FJL woiidfollow hkii back to thêipertment. 1zl t

RIPMW — I—‘14eS/DoLt11)zQUI J12/O1/201516:U !aq. 6 of 12

I at

00387

Mchpracje Police DeDarnent5*No0041

B again denIed’l Was not with him at any point after the Incident at tflas gtgtlon. -

Bstated he cell phone on WILLIAMS’ vehide when contacted by police..- 1AlQ’t

DetectivêGlimour left the roomtO get-1 thing to eat. After Dejllye Gilmour left the mom,Bhdked me if I thougHthe ku) I told him I did. B J I said, ‘No. I didn’t kill him. Wegot in if’altercatIon and i waIkoff..” nt his way. He came back, and I left and kept going.” He went on tosa that he went to his mom, b H tayed outside, still “talking shit.” When he heard the gunshots.B J stated he thought Th ye been just “lighting some shots off because he was mad.”

___

iwo.(t -

I asked B fhow many shots he heard, and he stated he wasn’t trying to count. When asked, 8J_ •statedthathewasnotbylngtckHlHL[I

______

I asked 8 repeatedly who the third pr’son present at the time of the shooting was, and B - deniedanyone else was present -

I asked 81did, and wand kept II

]

00388

-I. — — “viéfftäHdqrabbed

fl.AJ1k’

at’him’ even after he flredjlhe ,arig shots. -BJ” j stated he- -

-‘- — _.• his gun- shot him, a-1B replied, “probably”

ni If he hadn’t shot A . B askedJilmour replied that was becuse4. foófprints

replied, “my fooL..Ok. So It is whàtt isih’ñ- let’s go.”LJC’Vb

between what he was Iling me was the presence of this thirda ground at H S feet.aiid yell - was dead from

g at the ground, and If anythIng thábullets had ilcochel andd did not try to shoot him. 1

iwcth

Detectivetelling us.

ii

-1Jw

ng for

utd kiL to go.

that sore of the things he had told Officer Faagau differed from what he was— iu had not spoken to him

Detective

tL

Detective CCEbdowh.

like this happened he would like to try,1q. protect HARRIS. Hesolutely certain that none of H1 ‘S injunes Were caused

kIed him and that was why the clothing In hotel room #201ie clothIng he had been at the time of the incident, and stated

nt out the inconsistencies with Fan to get frustrated, then I

tiotaroundt.__itatedatnoc

/

--‘sipai

up andriock him

Ii’rntiafiy

•1

i, and he said he tiiay have intended

vo warning shots at

-i

I told him that decisIon hadn’t been made yet At thisie morn and paused the intefvlew as well as the digital recording

OLEtIXQUZ

ur and I went back into the interview room and continued the—— 1 laIn down on the floor and fallen asleep ,eJook a couple ofstated he was not feslino well We remindedrL that the randa

ti2/Ol/2015 16:11 7 of 1.2

a,a,SUa,

a,Dl0.

3a,a,3.a,-I

a,

0)•0

00.3.

3

3.0)0.0)

a,0.0

03

.0Ca,U,

3

3.

30)

3.0

I

III

a0

0

IIo0

I

I 5SuppLement No

I - 0021

TweeetIz Twc,Ji

questions e irview. that he

_____

t for two nights. He said that he was tired of his glrltriend, JENMFER, whose last name

he ._ned not to know. I asked WILLIAM what time TJJJ left. WILLIAM said that he didn’t pay very much

attention to time. WILLIAM said that T — J lff during the “nighttime.” 1 asked him to name everyone at

LJ _‘S house before T heft. WILLIAM said that STELLA (or STILL), DIRT, and I

were there, and that TWEEZE had been there earlier. WILLiAM told me that there wasn’t “really” any problems

before TWEEZE and his “baby momma” argued. I asked WILLIAM if TWEEZE was at the apartment when

Tleft; WILLIAM said that he wasn’t. 1 asked WILLIAM to tell me about TWEEZE’S argument with his

child’s mother. WILLIAM said that TWEEZE was drunk. WILLIAM thought that this argument occurred a few

hours before 1 1 left; he said that TWEEZE had been at the apartment for 1-3 hours. I asked him If it

was correct that TWEEZE was gone before left; WILLIAM said that this was correct. WILLIAM said

that TWEEZE was “tough housing her around.” WILLIAM did not know what TWEEZE’S child’s mother’s name

was. I asked him to tell me about it being rough. WILLIAM indicated that they were pushing each other and that

everyone saw thIs occur, IrwAuding DIRT and T I asked him what they were arguing about WILLIAM

said that she wanted TWEEZE to leave and TWEEZE wanted to stay WILLIAM thought that their child was 2-3

years old and that he was there at the time of the argument WILLIAM told me that TWEEZE was angry after this

argument WILLIAM told me that TWEEZE’S child’s mother left and TWEEZE stayed, but that TWEEZE left after

she did.

WILLIAM said that DIRT told him (WILLIAM) that Twent to the Holiday. t asked WILLIAM what it was

I _was talking about before he left. WILLIAM said that It was nothing important. I asked him what it

was he heard T -talking about. WILLIAM indicated that he didn’t hear anything and that he did not even

realize that TERRANCE left. I asked WILLIAM if he saw T — left; WILLIAM said that he didn’t. I asked’:

,—ILLtAM what DIRT was talking about before I left. WILLIAM told me that DIRT was t’ ‘“ .4 4...

ideo game they were playing. I asked WILLIAM who T left with. WILLIAM said that Ti____

y himself I asked him it anyone carrie and got 1 WILLIAM Indicated that someone came and go’

ITRANCE, but he seemed to be revertIng to when I L returned from the Holiday gas station

WILLIAM then said that when TJ- 1 ..turned he left briefly to pay for the room. WILLIAM told me that -i

when T-

I came back from the Holiday store he was “rushing.” I asked him how long he thought

T1_ was gone for. WILLIAM said that it was about 20-30 minutes1 but he didn’t think that he (WILLIAM)

was In the room whenT came back. I reminded WILLIAM that he said T was “weird” wher),

he came back from the Holiday gas station. I asked WILLIAM to tell me everything he saw and heard when

TERRANCE came back. WILLIAM said that it seemed as though I was “rushing” and that he wanted

to leave. I asked him how It was TERRANCE seemed rushed. He said that Twanted to leave. I

asked WILLIAM what sort of behavior TERRANCE was exhibiting that made It seem as though he was rushed.

WILLIAM indicated that TERRANCE said 1’ ito leave. WILLIAM said that Tf put on a hooded

sweatshirt and a hat. WILLIAM said that I — 1 them that they were leaving and he asked WILLiAM if

he was coming. WILLIAM said that he t _iat he was going to stay. I asked WILL1AM again what ft

was that seemed “weird” TC - - —— .l said that T was “hollering” that he had to

leave. WILLIAM said that T_— was “doing some bulishit, too.” I confirmed with WILLIAM that

I—

LUeft for about 20-30 minutes, came back, left the room to pay for the room, and then came back

again I reminded WILLIAM that he said T had been doing some “bullshlr and I asked him to tell me

about that WILLIAM said that he was putting on hIs coat and wanted to leave I asked WILLIAM it he thought

that the way in which T — was acting was strange WILLIAM agreed that It was and remarked that

TI -didn’t ever really go anywhere.

I asked WILL!AMto name everyone at the apartment when Tj

DlRIgjiMepd andWlWAMwe,e there I asked hisure thdihey i’ieê”ihèir little conVatlon” I toId, lfTsaidanythingtoDIRT. WILLIAMtoIUme

ionversatlön I asked him to tell me about that WILLIAM said that he thought that they did have a conver&.,

he added that DIRT andTwere like brothers and that T Iprobably wasn’t going towali h..

a room and not have a conversation with DIRT. I asked him if he heard them say anything. WILLIAM indIcated

that he was paying closer attention to the game. WILLIAM said that DIRT and STILL left before d1d.

Romc.,,,,.

.. .-.....,.....

,28976/QmScHRiSTOPHER C

vW w1k

-r’ Ierrj ID

W\ ç:c4wi o +‘(e (4

cametkI

..I I that D

FnmeQA .- -

I-- -

103/18/201.5 1142 J.Pag.Z- --

-

Y 5 Supplement Na—

0021nchorage Police Department

I iii HF:1iTA rtaE;1t1’Te second time. HesaId that he didn’t know where they went.

. .

•1 askedjIWAM what sort of relationship 1 and TWEEZE had. WILLIAM told me that they were%Iends rasked him how they were getting along beIre TWEEZE left WILLIAM said that they were geftLng along“good” and that TWEEZE was drunkW1WAMtnicated that 1WBEZE andTddnot’get into nyWumez1ts I asked WILLIAf%4 to rate 1NEEZES level of Intoxication on ascaleof I to 70 wIth 10 being &mosunconscious WILLIAM said that TWEEZE was “gefflng to a ten I-to thought TWEEZE had been drinking vodkaI asked WILLIAM to tell me what happened after everyone (save for WILLIAM) left WILLIAM said that he wen1to sleep ad he kept waking up to people pounding on the door He told me that the peopie were yelling that theywere the police I asked him what he thought the police wanted, athe time WILLIAM a1d that he dlthft haveany clue, and..he thought If was about TMsome bullshlt” I asked hIrn what sort of “bultsNt4 hethought the policewere there to deal wlttt WI LLIAM told me ft dn..t know WIWAM told me that Ito went to sleep and tiewoke up to a “megaphone.’t

1 asked WILLIAM what TWEEZE was wearinbefore hQ left. WILLIAM thought that TWEEZE was wearing awhite t shirt and blue Jeans (possibly Dickie brand jean3. I asked WILLIAM if TWEEZE carried any weapons.WILLIAM said that he didn’t that he knew about. 1 asked WILLIAM If TWEEZE had a gun when he left; WILLIAMsaid “Not that I know of...” I asked him if he thought TWEEZE had a gun when he left. WILLIAM said that hemight have because of the lifestyle he led I asked WILLtAM It TWEEZE was a drug dealer; WILLIAM said that hewasn’t He told me that TWEEZE used marijuana WILLIAM told me that he hadn’t seen TWEEZE use crack,and that TWEEZE didn’t use methamphetamine. “

ET GiL’OUcontinud asking questions at this point. IhiIe DEl. GILMOUR was asking about firearmsWILLIAM told mëthat h hadn’t handled any firearms in TT S room.

owed

WILLIAM the same photo lineups I sIwed to ad Prior to giving WlLI4AM1the,manilaelope containing the two Ilneups I read him are-vievg adviement WILLIAM said that he did not knowanyone in the photo lineup marked B WILLIAM afd that hb rQ,pognized TUf in the photo lineup markedA I stopped talkIng wfth WILLIAM at about 1245 liOti.ACTION TAKEN:I conferred with DEl. DOLL and DEl. GILMOUR and we generated follow up questions for WILLIAM.FOLLOW UP INTERVIEW WITH WILLIAM (TAPED);I asked WILLIAM what DIRT was wearing when he last saw him. WILLIAM said that DIRT was wearing bluejeans and a large black coat. WILLIAM also thought that DIRT was wearing winter boots. I asked WILLIAM whenit was DIRT left. WILLIAM told me that DIRT left after T came back from the Holiday gas station. Iasked WILLIAM what TWEEZE’S child’s mother’s name was. He Indicated that he did not know. WILLIAMdescribed her as being a black female adult in her 30s. I asked WILLIAM it he had ever called DIRT. WILLIAMsaid that he aIwaycalled T — S phone. WILLIAM said that T ‘S contact wasn’t listed In hisphoned I told me that he didn’t save anything as co4ct I asKeØWILLIAM howT5number would be listed in his phone WILLIAM said that heoa16tavetoIookfor it i askedhIh Where he wouldlook for It He said that he would look in his call log WILUAMtoId methathe did not hv#’TWEEZEt$ phbnenumber He said that he lived with TWEEZE off of Duben, possibly in 2013 He added that they lived together forabout 1 ½ months. I asked WILLIAM If there was going to be acode to his: phone. He told me that there wasn’t.I asked him where his other phone was. WILLIAM told me that an Officer took his phone. He told me that theiPhone didn’t work and that he didn’t know what the code was. WILLIAM said that he hadn’t used the IPhone inabout 1-2 weeks.

I told WILLIAM that It sounded as thoughDIRT afled somecne tocØgj,iem. I asked WILLIAM to,teJlme all about that phone call WILLIAM said “Just telling him to come on” I asked him to tell me everything that.,eryone said WILLIAM totd me ‘GOme get me?” I asked him how DIRT so$hded when hêsald that WILLIAMthat he didn’t sound “mad” WILLIAM told me that DIRT didn’t sound rushed. I askedhim why DIRT calledman to come and get them WILLIAM said that he was assuming that ft was to come and get them t askedim what T — — was doing while DIRT was making the call. WILLIAM thought that I wasdownstairs paying for the room. I asked WILLIAM about DIRT’S shoes. WILLIAM thought that DIRT had boots:Re OIcI?

- fPrkiiedAt28976/THOMAS, CHRISTOPHZR C .[03ti4/2015 I.: 42., ...,...Pag. 3 of4..

0flflfl12 :

Supplement No:’0021

tRepottomoer ‘‘ PlintedAg .,‘.—.,. -

:18976JJE0!4,2 ISTZC 03/18/201 1142.... PL4LQ4.-._;

‘- -

‘

‘

00k13

15-6508

shoes he t.I asked him about i ....._...c and white fahnough

predominately black) low-top ,

WIWAM asked me what we were waiting on I told him that we were looking into everything He asked me if he

was going and I told him that he wasn’t just yet 1 asked him if he could help us to understand why TWEEZE was

killed. WILLIAM said that he didn’t know. I asked him what he thought. WILLIAM told me that they obviously had

a miscommunication about something; WILLIAM said that he didn’t have a clue about what it might have been

and that he hadn’t seen “them” fight. I asked him who he was talking about when he said that he hadn’t seen

“them” fight. He said that he was talking about everyone. I told WILLIAM that I did not think that he had been

completely honest with me I explained to him that TWEEZE was his friend and that he (WILLIAM) needed to be

more honest than he had been I asked WILLIAM why he thought TWEEZE was killed He said that he didn’t

have a clue. I asked him what he thought happened. WILLIAM said that they were all drunk and that “tempers

fly” and that anything could happen I asked him whose temper was “flying” WILLIAM said that no one’s temper

was “tlylng” He thought that everythIng was “cool” except for what happened between TWEEZE and his child’s

mother I asked him If I —was in a relationship with her, he told me that neither T nor DIRT

was in a relationship with her.

ACTION TAKEN:DET. DOLL advised me that she had a search warrant to collect WILLIAM’S clothing, fingerprints, and a known.

sample of his DNA I collected WILLAM’S clothing and while doing so I found that he ha4 a large wad of cash In

his pocket along with another cell phone DET DOLL modifted her search warrant to Inelude the seizure of these

items,.. DET. CLINT THOMAS then took WILLIAM’S fingerprints. DET. CLINT THOMAS:an I then prUoessed

iI’s body for evidence.

OBSERVATIONS OF TERRANCE BEASELY:Tappeared to be tired and he claimed at one point to not feel well. I -_as wearing a

olored Alaskan Grown hooded sweatshirt, a black t shirt undem.ath that, blue jeans’, 5lue sweat pants

pockets) underneath his jeans. I took photographs of T both clothed and unclothed. I visually

examined T JS body, to include his eyes and behind h1ears. I did not see anyJjurIes’. I asked

T — if he was injured and he said he was not. I gathered a known sample of T ‘S DNA.

I saw that Twas wearing black and white (predominately black) Nike brand shoes. The shoe had a

waffle-type pattern near the front with a lightning-bolt type pattern which ran down the middle of the shoe

(although it did not run the length of the shoe).

ACTION TAKEN:Alter processing WILLIAM for evidence I packaged and logged all of the evidence I seized from him Likewise,

ater,pacessJng T_ for evidence I packaged and logged the evidence I seized from him.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:W1WAM requested that APD write him a receipt for the money we seized from him DET CLINT THOMAS found

al’id writté’’ receipt and I indicated on the receipt that APD seized $2,950 dollars from WILLIAM.

B-FILED DOCUMENTS:Ie-flIed the receipt, copies of the photo Ilneups I showed to various witnesses during the investigation, and

WILLIAM’S hand-drawn sketch ofTSapartment.

CASE STATUS:ATTACH TO ORIGINAL.

L•j.iit;iti’I - - -

t:H0MDZ,.

State v. Terry B.

Forensic Analysis

40 Caliber Taurus: According to Deb Gillis, the 8 spent casings seized at the scene were firedfrom this gun, as was H15002392, the bullet found in a wall of a building at the scene at placard2. Also, Gillis concluded that 998195 (bullet recovered from victim’s abdomen) could have beenfired from this gun, but there isn’t enough detail for a match. Gun found empty at scene.

Here are all of the numbers associated with the DNA testing of the .40 Caliber gun:

H15002395 (crime scene team #) 993769 (swab from pistol’s slide) + 993770 (swab frompistol’s grip) + 993771 (swab from pistol’s trigger) Q6 (extract from swabs generated bycrime lab) = 2015-012609EV; (DNA Solutions lab number for extract)

9mm Smith & Wesson: Had a 20 round magazine loaded with 15 cartridges. No evidence ofspent casings or bullets found at scene.

Here are all of the numbers associated with the DNA testing of the 9 mm gun:

HT5002396 (crime scene team #) 993774 (swab from pistol’s grip) ÷ 993775 (swab frompistol’s hammer) ÷ 993776 (swab from pistol’s slide) Q12 (extract from swabs generated bycrime lab) = 2015-012609EV2 (DNA Solution’s lab number for extract)

Nike Shoes Size 12 Seized from Parkwood room #201:

H15002410 (crime scene team #) 993766 (swabs from inside heal area) + 993768 (swabsfrom tongue/laces) + 993767 (insoles from shoes) Q2 (extract from swabs generated bycrime lab) = 2015-012609EV3 (DNA Solution’s lab number for extract)

One Gray Sweatshirt:

999531 (swab of sweatshirt for wearer DNA) 999531-1 (extract from sweatshirtgenerated by crime lab)

, State of AlaskaDepartment of Public Safety

SCIENTIFIC CRIME DETECTION LABORATORY REPORTBill Walker, Governor

Gary Folger, Commissioner

Eight discharged 40 S&W caliber cartridge cases (Items #HT5002385, #HT5002386,#HT5002387, #1-115002388, #HT5002389, #HT5002390, #H15002391 and #H15002393)One fired bulletOne fired bulletOne 40 S&W caliber Tauws Model PT 24fl PRO semiautomatic pistol, serial number SAM03068One 9mm Luger caliber Smith & Wesson Model 5906 semiautomatic pistol with an obliteratedserial number and 15 live 9mm Luger caliber FC headstamped cartridges

Results, Conclusions and Opinions

400CCs These eight cartridge cases were fired in Item #HT50022395.

998195 This bullet could have been fired from Item #HT5002395; however, this bullet lacksmicroscopic detail necessary for a firearm identification.

HT5002392 This bullet was fired from Item #H15002395.

HT5002395 Operable, two magazine-fed cartridges loaded, chambered, fired, extracted, and ejected asdesigned.

HT5002396 Standard serial number restoration techniques revealed the following characters: VCZ4572.

This pistol is operable. Two magazine-fed cartridges loaded, chambered, fired, extracted,and ejected as designed.

Two of the submitted cartridges were used for testing.

scanned -/tO/’

cc-client___________calendered

________

Anchorage Police Department

15

Harold Strahle

General Firearms Analysis

April 20, 2015Requesting Agency:

Agency File Number:

Report To:

Requested Service:

Items Analyzed

Item #

4ODCCs

998195HT5002392HT5002395

HT5002396

Laboratory Number: 15 I

fill IINhI HAl Ill 11111 lffi ili 11111 fiN illhii ll lhii Hill f Il

4

Forensic Scientist Ill: Debra L. Gillis

Report Technically Reviewed by Robert]. Shem

4805 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Ave. Anchorage, AK 99507 Voice (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 868-7946Accredited by ASCLDILAB-Intemational Testing Program Certificate ALI-251-T

Page 1 of I

State of AlaskaDepartment of Public Safety



July 21, 2015Requesting Agency: Anchorage Police Department Laboratory Number 15-01507Agency File Number: 15-Report To: Harold Strahie Null IIUI llhIU1flhIH1U lIIHh11ll A 1111 I1I1 IIU 111111 11111 JIll 1IRequested Service: DNA Major Crimes

Items Analyzed

Item #

932634 Known buccal from Wlliam932635 Known buccal from. 1_ ¶evV’992154 Known buccal from Gregory 1 1k.993769 Swabs from slide993770 Swabs from grip993771 Swabs from trigger993774 Swabs from grip993775 Swabs from hammer993776 Swabs from slide998193 Known blood from Seniwali Howard999531 DG Sample 999531-1 from sweatshirt

Results. Conclusions and OpinIons

Reference Biological Screening report dated April 21, 2015 by Debra Gulls.

999531 DG Sample 999531-1 from sweatshirtDNA from at least three individuals was observed in this sample. Wlliamcannot be excluded as thesource of DNA detected in the major component of this sample. L

LI .JLe of DNA detected in the major component of this sample. Due to thecomplexity of the genetic profile obtained from the minor component of this sample, no meaningful comparisonscan be made to known reference samples.

Single Source Formula:The estimated frequency (8 core loci) of the genetic profile from the major component of the above sample(s) isapproximately 1 in 8 billion (Caucasian population), 1 in 7 billion (African-American population), I in 232 billion(Athabaskan population), I in 7 trillion (Inupiat population) and 1 in 933 billion (Yupik population).

993769 Swabs from slid.993770 Swabs from grip993771 Swabs from frlgg•rThe above samples were combined for analysis. Quantification results indicate the presence of male DNA. Basedon the low quantity of DNA present In this sample, the recommended amplification procedure would consume theremaining sample in its entirety.

No further analysis will be performed on this sample without written permission from Department of Law forconsumption of the sample In Its entirety. For more information, please contact the laboratory s DNA Technical

anager, Cheryl Duda (269-5667) or cheryl.dudaaIaska.gov.

4805 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Ave. Anchorage, AK 99507 VoIce (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 868-7946Accredited by ASCLDILAB4ntemaionaI Testing Program Certificate ALl -251-T

Page 1 of 3 00441


SCIENTIFIC CRIME DETECTION LABORATORY REPORT

Bill Walker Governor

Gary Folger Commissioner

15-01507

Results. Conclusions and Opinions - continued111111 1111111 IJU hull iiii ui huh iiiiu ii uu Ihll hl 111111 11111 1111 III

993774 Swabs from grip993775 Swabs from hammer993776 Swabs from slideThe above samples were combined for analysis. Quantification results indicate the presence of male DNA. Based

on the low quantity of DNA present in this sample, the recommended amplification procedure would consume the

remaining sample in its entirety.

No further analysis will be performed on this sample without written permission from Department of Law for

consumption of the sample in its entirety. For more information, please contact the laboratory s DNA Technical

Manager, Cheryl Duda (269-5687) or [email protected].

4805 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Ave. Anchorage, AK 99507 VoIce (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 858-7946

Accredited by ASCLDILAB-Intemational Testing Program Certificate ALI-251-T

Laboratory Number:

Page 2 of 300442

Jt. State of AlaskaDepartment of Public Safety


Bill Walker, Governor

Gary Edger, Commissioner

Laboratory Number 15—01507 I 11111 1111111 110 IlII III? 11111111111111111111111111111101111111111111 JIll JillResults, Conclusions and OInlon - continued

Methods

The human DNA recovered from the above item(s) was amplified by the polymerase chainreaction (PCR) using the Promega PowetPleJ6 kit. The following loci were amplified:D3S1358,THO1, D2IS11, D18S51, D5S81 8. D13S317, D7S820, D16S539, CSF1PO, WA, D8S1179, TPOX, FGA,Penta D, Penta E, and Amelogenin. The amplified DNA was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis using the AppliedBiosystems 3500x1 Genetic Analyzer.

Statistics are based on U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, pstats (CODIS version 7.0). Allele frequencies arefrom the Popstats amended database and the Alaska Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory. The following 13CODIS core STR loci are used in calculating Popstats:D3S1358,THOI, D2IS11, 018551, D5S81 8, D13S317,D7S820, D16S539, CSFIPO, vWA, D8SJ 179, TPOX and FGA.

For parentage statistics: The parentage trio, reverse parentage, and parent.offspring kinship calculations areperformed as required. For one-parent forward calculations, 0.5 is used for the prior probability.

(,For mixtures: Mixture Formula is used.

For single source samples: Probability of Locus Genotype, NRC ‘96 random-match probability formulae;e = 0.01 for Caucasian and African American population groups.B = 0.03 for Athabaskan, Yupik, and Inupiat populations.

1 billion = 1,000,000,000; 1 trillion = 1,000,000,000,000; 1 quadrillion = 1,000,000,000,000,000;1 quintillion = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000; 1 sextillion = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,00Q1 septillion = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Profiles are entered into the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) in accordance with state and nationalregulations. COOlS is a DNA database that has the potential to generate investigative leads in cases wherebiological evidence is recovered from a crime scene.

Disposition of Evidence: Retained in Laboratory

orensic Scientist lii: Jennifer Foster

Report Technically Reviewed by Michelle Collins4805 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Ave. Anchorage, AX 99507 Voice (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 868-7946

Accredited by ASCLD/LAB-Intemational Testing Program Certificate ALl -251-T

Page 3 of 3 00443




August 18, 2015

Requesting Agency:

Agency File Number:

Report To:

Requested Service:


15-6508

Harold Strahle

DNA Major Crimes

Laboratory Number: 15-01507

111111 IIlltII 111111 III lUhI IIII IIII I IIU IIIIIIffIII 1111 IIII III 1111 III

Swabs from inside heel of shoes

Swabs from tongue and laces of shoes

Results, Conclusions and Opinions

993768 Swabs from tongue and laces of shoes

DNA from at least three individuals was observed in this sample Due to the complexity of the genetic profile

obtained from this sample, no meaningful comparisons can be made to known reference samples.

993766 Swabs from inside heel of shoes

Quantification results do not indicate the presence of amplifiable DNA. No further analysis was performed on this

sample.

4805 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Ave. Anchorage, AK 99507 Voice (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 868-7946

Accredited by ASCLD/LAB-intemational Testing Program Certificate ALI-251-T

Items Analyzed

Item #

993766993768

Page 1 of 200444

f. State of AlaskaDepartment of Public Safety


Bill Walker, GovernorGary Folger, Commissioner

5—01507 111111111111111011111111011111111111111 1111111011111111111111111111111111111Results. Conclusions and Opinions - continued

Methods

The human DNA recovered from the above item(s) was amplified by the polymerase chainreaction (PCR) using the Promega PowerPle16 kit. The following loci were amplified:D3S1358, THO1, D2IS1J, D18551, D5S818, Df3S3f 7, D7S820, 0165539, CSF1PO, IVA, D8S1179, TPOX, FGA,Penta D, Penta E, and Amelogenin. The amplified DNA was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis using the AppliedGiosystems 3500x1 Genetic Analyzer.

Statistics are based on U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, Fbpstats (CODIS version 7.0). Allele frequencies arefrom the Popstats amended database and the Alaska Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory. The following 13CODIS core SIR loci are used in calculating Popstats: D3S1358, THO1, D2JS1 7, D18S51, 055878, D13S377,D7S820, D16S539, CSFIPO, vWA, D8S1179, TPOX and FGA.

For parentage statistics: The parentage trio, reverse parentage, and parent.offspring kinship calculations areperformed as required. For one-parent forward calculations, 0.5 is used for the prior probability.

jFor

mixtures: Mixture Formula is used.

For single source samples: Probability of Locus Genotype, NRC ‘96 random-match probability formulae;e = 0.07 for Caucasian and African American population groups.0 = 0.03 for Athabaskan, Yupik, and Inupiat populations.

1 billion = 7,000,000,000; 1 trillion = 1,000,000,000,000; 1 quadrillion = 7 000,000,000,000,000;1 quintillion = 1,000,000,000000,000,000; 1 sextillion = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,00Q1 septillion = 1,000,000000,000000,000,000,000

Profiles are entered into the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) in accordance with state and nationalregulations. CODIS is a DNA database that has the potential to generate investigative leads in cases wherebiological evidence is recovered from a crime scene.

DIsposition of Evidence: Retained in Laboratory

Scientist III: Jennir Foster

Report Technically Reviewed by Michelle Collins4805 Or. Martin Luther King Juniot Ave. Anchorage, AK 99507 Voice (907) 269-5740 Fax (907) 868-7946

Accredited by ASCLD!IAB-Intematfonal Testing Program Certificate ALI-251-T

Laboratory Number:

Page 2 of 2 00445

• DNA Solutions, Inc.• 840 Research Parkway, Suite 551 Oklahoma City, OK 73104

Ph (866) 362-9778 (405) 271-6033 — Fx (405) 271-6034

• 4

DNA$olutionsTechnical Examination Report

DNAS CASE NUMBER: 2015-012609

CLIENT: Marcelle McDannelOffice of Public Advocacy1016W. 6thAve, Suite 100Anchorage, AK 99503 —

ADPCase#15 I__

DATE OPENED: 12/22/2015

DATE REPORTED: 4/12/2016

DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE:

The following items were delivered from the Anchorage Police Department to DNA Solutionsby FedEx#775265309451 on 12/22/2015;

One (1) envelope containing the following items.DNAS # 2015-012609EV1 — Dried extract of pistol slide, grip, trigger, Q6DNAS # 2015-012609EV2 - Dried extract of pistol slide, grip, hammer, Q12DNAS # 2015-012609EV3 - Dried extract of shoe laces and tongue, Q2DNAS # 2015-012609EV4 - Swabs from inside shoesDNAS # 2015-012609EV5 - Swabs from gun hammerDNAS # 2015-012609EV6 - Swabs from gun triggerDNAS # 2015-012609EV7 - Swabs from gun gripDNAS # 2015-012609EV$ - Swabs from gun slideDNAS # 2015-012609EV9 - Swabs from shoe insolesDNAS # 2015-012609EV10 - Nike Shoes size 12

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS:

On December 31, 2015, the dried DNA extracts from DNAS # 2015-012609EV1 , DNAS #2015-012609EV2 , DNAS # 2015-012609EV3 were rehydrated in 40u1 of Promega ElutionBuffer, mixed and placed at 4 degrees to rehydrate. On January 5, 2016 the samples wereamplified using the Promega Fusion kit containing 22 autosomal markers. The results wereanalyzed and are presented in the table below.

Page lof4

Technical Examination Report, continued 2015-012609

Q6 Q12 Q22015-0126091Vi 2015-012609EV2 2015-012609EV3

Marker Allele calls Allele calls Allele calls

D13S317 91112 10111214 101112

CSF1PO 10 12 10 11 12 10 11 12

PENTAD 1013 81013 101213

PENTAE 11141$ 1012141$ 10141518

D7S820 101112 7101112 891112

vWA 15 16 17 18 15 16 17 18 14 16 17 18

D10S1248 131415 131415 131415

THO1 789.3 7899.3 78

FGA 212425 212425 21222425

D19S433 13 14 15 13 14 14.2 15 13 14 14.2 15

D21S11 2830 283031 282930

D165539 10111213 10111213 910111213

D12S391 17 1920 17 18 1920 17 18 19 2023

D18S51 13 14 15 17 19 1415 16 17 19 1213 14 15 17

D22S1045 15 16 15 16 17 11 15 16

D2S1338 171924 1819222425 1718192224

D3S1358 14151617 14151617 141516

D5S818 111213 10111213 111213

D151656 12 14 15 16.3 17.3 14 15 16 16 3 17.3 14 15 16 17 3

D8S1179 101112131415 1011121315 11121315

D2S441 11 11.3 12 11 11.3 14 10 11 11.3 14

TPOX 8 811 811

DESCRIPTION OF EVifiENCE:

The following items were delivered from the Anchorage Police Department to DNA Solutionsby FedEx#7755 17248327 on 02/01/2016;

One (1) envelope containing the following items.DNAS # 2015-012609RE1 — Swabs from William 1 ‘

DNAS # 2015-0i2609RE2 - Swabs from —., aDNAS # 2015-012609RE3 - Swabs from Gregory T i-

DNAS # 2015-012609RE4 - Swabs from 1 TA.jCj

On February 2, 2016 the swabs were processed for DNA isolation and analysis. The sampleswere amplified using the Promega Fusion kit containing 22 autosomal markers. The results wereanalyzed and are presented in the table below.

Page 2 of 4


2015-012609RE1 2015-012609RE2 2015-012609RE3 2015-012609RE4Marker

D13S317 1112 1214 1114 1112CSF1PO 1012 1011 1112 1012PENTA 0 10 13 5 10 8 11 7 9PENTAE 1418 1415 1012 511075820 11 12 12 7 10 10 11vWA 16 18 15 16 15 16 16 17D1051248 14 15 14 15 14 15 13 15THO1 $ 78 89.3 7FGA 2125 1921 24 24250195433 1415 1314 1314.2 14021511 28 30 30 33.2 30 31 2$ 31.20165539 1113 11 1213 10110125391 1920 2023 17 1519018551 1415 1718 1719 1320D22S1045 15 16 15 16 17 15 17D2S1338 1924 1822 1925 2023D3S1358 1416 1617 1415 1216D5S818 1113 812 1012 1113D151656 15 17.3 16 16.3 14 15 16.30851179 11 10 15 12 13 15025441 11 11.3 14 11 11 12TPOX 8 8 811 811

¶ry 13-

The software package, Lab Retriever, was used to evaluate the lilceithood that any one of theseindividuals, represented by the reference samples, were contributors to the mixtures from theevidence items. The table below lists the likelihood ratios for each scenario tested. Mi analyseswere done using the same assumptions: p(D1’)=.Ol (probability of drop-in), p(DO)=O.8(probability of drop-out), fst=.0 1 (coancestry adjustment), ffiDO (Identity by descent),Hl=YS+3LTNK (the suspect is the source of the evidence profile), H2=OS+4UNK (a randomindividual is the source of the evidence profile). The analysis was run under the assumption thatthe individuals are not related to one another. Allele frequencies from the MST populationdatabases for African Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics were used.

2015-012609EV1 African American Caucasian HispanicQ6 Slide, grip, triggerWilliam 1,153,300,000 29,738,000 40,602,000

0.84 13.16 0.66Gregory 7.85 17.09 21.93

15.18 52.42 20.13

Page 3 of 4


—rt’t .

iv

Conclusion:The dried DNA extracts from Q6 (DNAS # 2015-012609EV1), Q12 (DNAS # 2015-

012609EV2) , Q2 (UNAS # 2015-012609EV3) each produced DNA mixture profiles uponanalysis. Lilceithood analysis is used to determine which of 2 mutually exclusive hypotheses arefavored. In the cases tested here we are testing the hypothesis that the genetic data is more likelyif it was from 1 suspect and 3 unknown contributors as compared to the alternative hypothesisthat the genetic data is more likely if it was from 4 unknown individuals. For each evidence item,each reference sample was substituted individually into the analysis as the possible suspect andthe value recorded. The values recorded are the lilcelthood ratios. The Likelihood ratios greaterthan one favor the first hypothesis (the reference sample is the contributor) where as ratios lessthan one favor the alternative hypothesis (a random individual is more likely the contributor).Values close to one do not favor on hypothesis more than the other. Based on the strength of thelikelihood ratios, William ‘annot be excluded as a contributor to each of the mixtures.The suspects Gregory Hand e more highly favored as contributor to themixture from Q6(EV1). Gregory s most hi y favored as a contributor to Q12 (EV2)with I also favored as a ontributor. is unlikely to be a

or Q2 (E ). 1’Wol’I

The original package containing the articles has been retained and will be returned upon writtenrequest.

%AJ tAL%) 4/12/2016Brandt G. Cassidy,’hD DateLaboratory Director

2015-012609EV2 African Caucasian HispanicQ12 Slide, grip, trigger AmericanWilliam 38,000,000 9,050,000 1,260,000

28 68 23.9Gregory - 6,134,000 54,553,000 82,686,000

0.0028 0.0281 0.0080

2015-012609EV3 African Caucasian HispanicQ2 Shoe laces and tongue AmericanWilliam 129,000,000 2,180,000 3,430,000

1.08 1.68 0.609Gregory i 0.0193 0.234 0.267

J 0.00258 0.00359 0.00116

Page 4 of 4

0 (b(

I\fr

I

/1;

0

—a—

0

2

c.

.5-4

— (L

-___T

h—

—S

cJ

0

—1 a. 0 a.

I0

I0

L0—

---I

::

S

-.4—

3

0C Th

I®oa

—J

V

0

C -r

v

0

m

CD

0

HCciC

ci

0

0—

I

MUNICIPAliTY OF ANCHORAGE -


SKETCH SHEET

l.A

151-137 L I_94•

0k1 SCC*/cfJ

WCATION

c-t

vtk;v,:

325

with windows facing new seward. saw two (and only at an

Documents