wmd complaint to icc

8/13/2019 WMD Complaint to ICC

1/29

h Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/ launch?.rand =f e21 k

24 4/29/2012 I

From : I AM T o : "otp . informationdesk@icc -cpi. int" S e nt : Saturday, April21 , 2012 4 :51AM Subj e c t : Additional information and documentation for Reference OTP -CR -237/11

ATTN: Information and Evidence UnitOffice of the ProsecutorPost Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands or sent by email to ot [email protected] ,or sent by facsimile to +31 70 515 8555

James D. Hardin

12131 Louetta Rd. #920 Cypress, Texas 77429 U.S.A.

(Cell) 832 -349-2018 Email [email protected]

April21 , 2012

International Criminal Court (I.C.C. )

Information and Evidence UnitOffice of the Prosecutor Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands Tel. + 31 (0)70 515 8515 Fax +31 (0)70 515 8555

Email visits@ icc-cpi .int

ATfN: Luis Maren o-Ocampo , Prosecutor; Prosecuto r Fatou Bensouda, Deputy Prosecutor;Deputy Prosecutor Phakiso Mochochoko;Michel de Smedt , Head Investigations; Head of the Jurisdiction , Complementarity and Cooperation Division

I NRE: R ef erence OTP -CR -237/11
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


2/29

h Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=te21 k

24 4/29/20 12 I

Dear Sir /Madam,

I AM, James D. Hardin , who herein submit s this , OUR seco nd (2nd) add itional "Swo rn

Complaint a nd Demand" for the purposes of causing a Gra nd Jury to be convened regarding this cause o

ac tion, so as to cause a full, comp lete and thorough , Investigat ion to be commenced; and

Per the Rom e Statu te, I am providing you with additional National Laws showing National partyunderstands what

they are doing to b e unlawful and prohibited! Including the laws as written, including, any and/or all such

" C LASSIFIED " or " DECLASSIFIED ," Operations , and/or rather evidence containing such markings onthem

as: " DI S1RIBUTIO N RESTRICTIONS" which likely, in most cases includ e " DESTRUCTION N OTI CES" and

some are even marked " TO P SECRE T '' document Military bases , instillations , underground bunkers to

prohibited use of"ACT OF TE RRORISM "

There is no debate regarding the Laws of The unit ed States as to what has long been established as

unlawful and criminal among the civilized Na tions of the earth, that is regarding the Internationally Banned

Use ofboth , " BIOLOGI CAL " and "C HEMICAL WEAPONS " ofMass Destr uction (WMD's)!

Neither is there any room for a party found implicated , in any capac ity with regards to the mur der,

attempted murder, non-ju stifiable homicide , monetary damages , mental , physical anguish and other harms

injuries and/or damage committed against our family which is a pplicable under " The Racketeer

Influenced and Co rrupt Organizations Act." To further explain this act I will quote it, to wit:

" The Racket ee r Influenced and Corrupt Or ganizat ion s Act , commonly referred to as the RICOAct or simply RI C O , is a United States federal law that provides for extended crimina l pena l ties

and a c ivi l cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization . TheRICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows for the leaders of a syndicate to betried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them , closing a perceived loopholethat a llowed someone who told a man to , for example, murder, to be exempt from the tria l becausethey did not actually do it. RICO was enacted by section 90l(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 ( Pub.L. 91-452,R4 St;: t. 922 , en cted October 1 5, 1970) . RICO is codified a s Chapter 96 of 1itlc 1 & of the l JnitcdStates Code , 18 U.S.C. 1961 - 1968. While its original use was to prosecute the Mafia as well asothers who were actively engaged in organized crime , its application has been more widespread."


3/29

h Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/ launch'?.rand =te21 k

f24 4/29/2012 1

And further more we quote the following , to wit: "Several sc holars have accused the U nited State s of conducting stat e te r r ori sm. They havewritten about the liberal democracies and their use of state terr orism, parti cu larl y in relation to theCold War. According to them , state terrorism was u sed to protect the interest of capitali selites, and the U.S. organized a neo -colonial system of client states, co-operating with loc aelites to rule through terror. However, little of this work has been recognized by other scho lars of

terro rism or even of state terrorism. ill Work s include Noam Chomsky and Edwa r d S. Herma n's The political economy of human rights(1 979) , Herman's The rea/terror network (1985), Alexander L . George ' Western stale terrorism(1991), Frederick Gareau's State terrorism and the United States (2004) and Doug Stokes

America's other war (2005). Be gi nnjng in the late 1970s , Chomsky and Herman wrote a series of books on the Uruted States andstate terrorism. Their writings coinc ided with reports by Amnesty Internationa l and other humanright s or ganizations of a new global "e pid emic" of state torture and murder. Chomsky and Hermanobserved that terror was concent r ated in the U .S. sphere of influence in the Thi r d Wor ld, anddocumented terror carried out by U.S. c lient states in Latin America. They observed that of tenLatin American countries that had death squad s, all were U.S . client states. Worldwide, 74%of countries that used torture on an administrative basis were U.S. c lient state s, r ece ivingmilitary and oth er support to r etain power . They concluded that the global ri se in sta te terror was a result ofU.S. foreign polic y. Ul In 1991 , a book edited by Alex ander L. Geo r ge a lso argued that other Weste rn powers sponso redterror in Thlrd Wor ld countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its a llies were the main support e r s of terrori sm throu ghout the world. W Gareau sta tes that the number of deaths caused

by non-sta te terrori sm (3668 deaths between 1968 and 1980 , as estimated by the CIA) is "dwarfed" by those resulting from state terror ism in U.S.-backed regimes such as Guatemala (150 ,000 k illed , 50,000 missing in Guatema la- 93% of whom Gareau classifies as "victims of state terrori sm"). WChomsky concl uded that a ll powers backed state terrorism in client states. At the top were theU.S. a nd other pow e r s, notabl y the Uni ted Kingdom and France , that provided fin a nci a l,military and diplom atic su pport to Third World r egime s kept in power throu gh violence.

These governments acted "A deat h squad is an armed militar y, police, insurg ent, or terrorist sq uad that conductsextr a judicia l k illings, assassination s, and force d disappeara nces of persons as part of a war,insurgency or terror campaign. These killings are often conducted in ways meant to ensure the secrecy of the killers' ident ities , so as to avoid accountabi lity.l.l.lUl "Extrajudicial killin gs" are the illegal kjlling of leading political, trades union, dissident s, andsocial figur es by either the state government , state authorities like the armed forces and police (asin Liberia under Charles G. Taylor ), or crinlina l outfits suc h as the Italian Mafia" Death squads are often, but not exclusively, associated with the violent political repre ssionunder dictatorships, totalitarian stat es and similar regimes. The y ty picall y have the tacit orexpress support of the state , as a whole o r in part (see state terrorism ). Death squads may comprise

a secret po lice force , paramilitary group or officia l government units with members drawn from themilitary or the police. They may also be organized as v igilante gro u ps. State terrorism: may refer to acts of terr orism conducted by a state against a foreign state or

people . It can also refer to acts ofviolence by a state against its own people .

Now, therefore it can be argued from those in the know, or those previously trained on how to be

categorized and/or id entified with those whom hnve n trained eye, nnd therefore he /she know:s where to

look or recognizes the methods used! In this case: " the violent political repr ess ion und er dict ato r ships,


4/29f24 4/29/2012 1

h 'text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.co nvneo /launch? .rand=te21 k

totalitarian states and similar regimes " are not merely ju s t evidenced, but outright admitted in FM

27-10 "THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE" (Pub lished By: HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE

ARMY - WASHlNGTON, D.C. , 15 Jul y 1956. including Chang e No. 1 of the July 18, 1956 Ed., which

shows the structure on pg . D -0, of APPENDIX D, which is described in great detail on pg. D-1, t o wit:

"The heart of every mass-oriented insurgency is a disciplined political clement that directs both military forces and mass organimtions . In the Maoist tradition, the political element isthe central committee of the communist party. (Figure D-1 depicts the organization of a massoriented insurgency in simplified form.)"

Then in Figure D-2 ' 'Ty pical Activities Within Phase of Insurgenc y" under the genera l Title of " Phases And Typical Act iviti es" which list multiple stated methods of ac hievement broken out into threecategorical Phases , which are listed out under Phase I, Phase II and Phase II I , then identifying the stated primary directives , which are clearly laid out under the sta ted objectives as defin ed under a separate title

identified as:

" GOAL: POLITICAL CONTROL I REPLACEMENT OF THE SOOOECONOMIC

SYSTEM"

The stated and accepted policy and/or prohibitions with regards to the Un ited States C hemical

Weapons are p r ophetically stated in FM 27-10 !DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL]

"THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE" (DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JULY 1956) which states as

follows, to wit:

" FM 27-10 , 18 July 1956 , is changed as follows: Page 5. Paragraph 5 a (13) is added: (13) Geneva protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of asphy xiating,Poisonou s, or Other Gases , and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare of 17 June 1925 ( T. I. A .S. -), cited herein as Geneva Protocol of 1925 .

Page 18. Paragraph 37 b is superseded as follows: b. Discussion of Rule. The foregoing rule prohibits the use in war of poison or poisoned weapons against human beings. Re strictions on the use of herbicid es as well as treaty

provisions concerning chemical and bacteriological warfare are discu ssed in para graph 38.

Page 18. Paragraph 38 is superseded as follows :

38. Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare a. Tr eaty Provision. Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogousliquids, materials or devices, has been justly condemned by the generaJ opi nion of the civi lized worldd andWhereas the prohibition of such use has been declared in Treatie s to which the majority of Powers of theworld are Parties; and


5/29

f24 4/29/2012 I

;11 I t:Xl I"..UIIOr http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.cornlneo/launch?.rand=te21 ka

to tne ena mat tnJs pronrt>r tton Sllc11l oe umversa uy acceptea as a part or tntematronal Law , omamg a l rKe meco nscience and t he practice of nat io ns:

* * * the High Contracting Parties , so f a r as they are not already Partie s to Treaties prohibiting such use , accept thjs prohibit ion , agree to extend th is pro hi bition to the use of bacteri o logical methods of warfare and agree to be boundas betwee n themse lves according to the terms of this declaratio n. (Ge neva Pro toco l of 1 925 . )

b. Unit ed States Re servation to the Geneva Protocol of 1925. The said Protoc o l shall cease to be binding

on the governme nt of the U nited States w ith respect to the use in war of asp hyxiat ing, poisonous or othergases , and of a ll analogous liquids, materials , or dev ices , in rega r d to an enemy State if such State or any ofits allies fa ils to respect the proh i bitions laid down i n the Protocol.

FM2 7 -10 Appendix A - ii

c. Renunciation of Certain Uses in War of Chemical Herbicides and Riot Control Agents. The UnitedStates renounce s, as a matter of nat iona l po licy, first use of herb icides in war except use, under regulation sapp licable to their domestic use, for control of vege tation withi n US bases and installations or aro und theirimmed iate defensive perimeters, and first use of riot control agents in wa r except in defens ive militarymodes to save lives such as:

(I) Use of riot control agents in riot control situat ions i n areas under direct and distinct US military control ,to include contro lling rioting p r isoners of war. (2) Use of r iot control age nts in situat io ns in wh ich civ ilians arc used to mask or screen attacks and civiliancas u alties can be reduced o r avoided. (3) Use of riot control agents in rescue miss ions i n remotely iso lated area s, of downed aircrews and

passengers , and escaping prisoners. {4) Use of r iot contro l agents in rear eche lo n areas outside the zone of immediate com bat to protect convoys from civil d is turbances, terrorists and param ilitary organizations.

* * ** * NOW , THEREFORE, by virtue of the author ity vested i n me as Pres ident of the United States of America

by the Constitution and laws of the United State s and as Commander-in-C hief of the Armed Forces of the United States , it is hereby ordered as follows:

SECTI O N 1. The Secretary of Defense sha ll take all necessary measures to ensure that the use by the ArmedForces of the Uni ted States of any r iot control agents and chemical herbicides in war is prohib i ted u nless such usehas Presidentia l approval, in advance.

SECT IO N 2 . The Sec r etary of Defense s ha ll prescribe the rules and regu lat ions he deems necessary to ensure thatthe nationa l policy herein announced shall be observed by the Armed Forces of the United States. (Exec . Or der No.ll 850 , 40 Fed. Reg.16187 ( 1975).)

d .

Discussion. Although the language of t he 1925 Geneva Protocol appears to ban u unqua lifiedly the use in war of thechem ica l weapons w ithin the scope of its pro hibition, reservations s u bmitted by mos t of the Parties to the Protocol ,including the United States , have , in effect, rendered the Protoco l a prorubit ion only of the first use in war ofmate r ia ls with in its scope. Therefore , the U nited States, like many other Parties, has reserved the right to usechemical weapons against a state if t hat state or any of its a llies fa il to respect the prohib itions of the Protocol.

The reservatio n of the United States does not, however, re serve the right to retaliate w ith bacte r io logical metho ds of warfare aga inst a state if that state or any of its a llies f ai ls to respect the prohibitio ns ofthe Protocol. The prohibition concerning bacteriological methods of warfare which the United State s has acceptedunder the Protocol , therefore , proscribes not on ly the irutial but also any retaliatory use of bacteriological methods of
http://us.mg4.mai/http://us.mg4.mai/http://us.mg4.mai/http://us.mg4.mai/http://us.mg4.mai/http://us.mg4.mai/


6/29

f24 4/29/2012 I


7/29

h Text Editor hnp://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neollaunch?.rand=fe21 k

4/29/2012 1f24

W Vl \VQJJQ I C lV 111\..lUUC 11\Jl VlUJ

biological weapons but a lso toxin s, which, although not living orga nisms and therefore susceptib le of beingcharacter ized as chemical agent s, are genera lly produced from biological agent s. All toxin s, howeve r , regardless ofthe manner of production. are r egarded by the United States as bacteriological methods of warfare within the meaningof the proscrip tion of the Ge neva Protoco l of 1925.

Concerning chemical wea pons, the United States co nsiders the Geneva Pr otocol of 1925 as app ly ing to both lethaland incapacitat ing chemical agents. IJ1capacitating agents are tho se producing symptoms that per sist for hours or

even da ys afte r exposure to the agent has termi nated. It is the position of the Uni ted States that the Geneva Protocol of 1925 does not prohibit the use in wa r of either chemical herbicid es or r iot control agents, which a r e those agents of a type widely used by governments for law enforcement

purpose s because they produce, in a ll but the most unusual circumsta nces, mer ely transient effects that disap pearwithin minutes after exposu r e to the agent has terminated. In this connection,

FM 2 7 -10 Appendix A- iv

however , the United States has unilaterally renounced, as a matter of national policy, certai n uses in war of chemicalherbicides and riot control agents (see Exec. Ord er N o. 11850 above ). The policy and provisions of Executive Order

No. 11850 do not, howe ver , prohibit or restrict the use of chemical herbicide s or riot control agents b y US armedforces either (I) as retaliation in kind during armed confl ict or (2) in situations w hen the United States i s not engaged

in armed confli ct. Any use in am1ed conflict of herbicides or riot control agents, however , requires Presidentialapproval in adva nce. The usc in war of smoke a nd incendiary materials is not pr ohibited or res tricted by the Gene va Protocol of 1925.

Page 19. Paragraphs 39, 40, and 41 are superse ded as follows: 39. Bombardment of Undefended Place s Forbid den

a. Treaty Provision. The attack o r bombardment, by whate ver means, of towns , villages, dwellings , or buildings which ar e undefended is prohibited. (HR. art. 25.)

b. Int erpre tati on. An undefended place, within the meaning of Ar ticle 25, HR, is any inhabited p lace near or

i n a zone where op posing armed force s are in contact which is o pen for occupa tion by an adverse partywithout resistance. In order to be considered as undefended, the following conditions should be ful filled:

(I) Armed forces and a ll other combatants, as we ll as mobile weapons and mobi le military equipment, mu sthave been evacuated, or otherwise neutra lized;

(2) no hosti le use shall be made of fixed military installations or establishments;

(3) no acts of warfare sha ll be committed by the authorities or by the population; and,

(4) no activities in sup port of military operations sha ll be undertaken.

The presence, in the pl ace, of medical units, wounded a nd sick , and police for ces retained for the So le purpo se of maintaining law and o rd er does not cha nge the character of such an undefe nded place.

40. Permissible Objects of Attack or Bombardment a. Attacks Aga inst the Civilian Population as Such Prohibited Customary international law pr ohibits thelaunching of attacks ( includin g bombardment) against either the civilian population as such or individual civilians as s uch.

b. Defended Place s. Defended places , which are o utside the scope of the proscription of Article 25 , HR, are


8/294/29/2012 1

f24

h Text Editor http:// us.mg4.rnail.yahoo.comlneo/launch?.rand=fe21 k

permissible objects of attack ( includi ng bombardment). In this context, defended places include (1) A fort or fortified place.

(2) A place that is occup ied by a combatant military force or through which such a force is passing. The occupat ion of a pl ace by medica l un its a lone , howeve r , is not sufficient to r ende r it a permissable object ofattack. (3) A c ity or town s u rrounded by detached defen se pos itions , if unde r the circumstances the city o r town ca n be considered jointly with such defense positions as an indivis i ble who le. c. Mi litary Objectives. Military object i ves- i.e. , combatants, and those objects which by their

nature , location, purpose , or use make a n effective contribution to mi litary action and whose total or partialdestructio n, capture or neutra liza tion , in the ci r c um stances rulin g at the t i me , offers a definite m il itaryadvantage-are pcm1issible objects of attack (includi ng bombardment). M il itary objectives include , for example ,fac tories pr od ucing m u nitions and military supplies, mil itary camps, warehouses

FM 27-10 Appendix A- v

sto ri ng mun itions and mi li tary su p p lies , ports and railroads being used for the tra ns portatio n of mil itary su p p l ies , andot her pl aces that are for the accommodation of troops or the s u pport of mi litary operations . Pursuant to the provis ions of Article 25, HR however. c itie s, towns , vi llages, dwe ll ings, or build i ngs whic h may be c lassified as military objectives, but which are undefended (para . 39 b), are not pennissible objects of attack.

41. Unneces sa ry Kill ing a nd D evastation

Part icu larl y in the c i rc u mstances referred to i n th e prece d ing paragrap h, loss of life a nd damage to property incidental to attacks must not be exces s ive i n re la tion to t he conc r ete and di r ect military advantage expected to be gained. Those who p la n or decide upon an attack, therefore, mu st take all r easonable steps to ensure not only that the objec tive s arc identified as military objective s or defended place s within the meaning ofthe preceding paragra ph but al so that these objectives may be attacked without p r obable losses in l ives and damageto pro perty disproport ionate to the mili tary advantage a ntic i pated . Moreover, once a fo1t or defended loca lity hassurren dere d , on ly suc h further damage is permitted as is demanded by the ex igenc ie s of war , suc h as t he removal offortifications , demo li tion of mi litary buildi ngs, and de st ruction of military sto r es (HR. ar/. 23. pm: (g); GC, ar/. 53).By Order of the Secretary of the Anny:

FRE D C. WE YAN DGeneral, United States ArmyOfficial: Chief of Staff

P A U L T. SM ITH Major General , United States Army The Adjutant Genera!Distrib ution : Active Army , ARNG , USAR: To be d ist r i buted in accor dance with DA Form 12- llB, requiremen ts for the Law of Land Warfa r e.

FM 27-10 Appendix A - vi

F OREWORD

A list of the treat ie s r e lat ing to the conduc t of land warfare w hich have been ratified by the United State s, with the abb r eviated t i tles used i n th is Man ua l, is set forth on page ii i. The officia l Eng lish tex1s or atranslatio n of the pr i nci pal treaty provisions are q uoted verbatim i n bold type i n the relevant paragraphs throughoutthe Manua l. It s ho uld be noted. however. that the o fficia l text of the Hague Conve ntions of 18 October 1907 is theFrenc h text wh ich must be accepted as co ntroll i ng i n the event of a d is pute as to the meaning of any pro vision ofthese partic u lar conventions. (See TM 27-251 .)


9/29

h 'lext tdltOr http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand""fe21 k

4/29/2012 14

The 1949 Geneva Conve ntions for the Protection of War Victims have been ratified by the United States and came into force for this country on 2 February 1956. The effec t of these four conventions upon previoustreaties to which the United States is a party is disc uss ed in detail in paragraph 5 of the text. Each of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and each of the Geneva Conventions of 1864 , 1906 , and 1929will, of course, conti nue in force as between the United States and such of the othe r parties to the respectiveconventions as have not yet rati fied or adhered to the later , supersed ing co nvention(s) governi ng the sa me su bjectmatter. Moreover , even though States may not be parties to, or strictly bound by, the 1907 Hague Conventions and

the 1929 Geneva Conventio n relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, the genera l principl es of theseconve ntions have been held declar atory of the c ustomary law of war to which all States are subject. For thjs reason,the Urn ted States has adopted the policy of observing and enforcing the tenns of these conventions in so far as theyhave not been superseded by the 1949 Geneva Conve nti ons wruch necessarily govern the relations between the

parties to the latter (see paras. 6 and 7 ofthe tex1). The esse ntial provisions of each of the earlier conve ntions mention ed above have been s ubsta ntiall y incorp orate dinto the m ore r ecent and more compre hens ive conventions on the same subject matt er , so that observance of thelatte r wi ll usually include observance of the former. For this reason, only the more r ecent 1949 Geneva Conventionsand the releva nt provisions of the 1907 Hague Conventions are q uoted in this Ma nu al. Pertinent i nfonnatio nconcerning the current status of ratifica tions, adherences , reservations, and denunciations (withdrawals) wi ll be

transmitted by higher authority to commanders in the field, as occasions, arise, thus rendering unnecessary theinclusion of suc h data in this Manual, and avoid ing the frequent changes that such inclusion would entail. Whenever

poss ible , this Manual should b e used in conjunction wi th TM 27-251, Treaties Governing Land Warfare. FM 27-5 ,Civil Affairs / Military Government , which deals with military government policy and administ ration, shou ld beconsulted in connection with chap ter 6 of the present Manual.

FM 27-10 Appendix A - vii

ABBREVIATIONS

GWS Geneva Conve ntion for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed For ces in the Fie ld, 12 Augu st 1949.

GWS Sea Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded, Sick and Ship wrecke d Members of Armed Force s at Sea , 12 August 1949.

GPW Geneva Convent ion Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 12 August 1949.

GC Geneva Convention Relati ve to the Prote ct ion of Civilian Persons in

Time ofWar , 12 August 1949 .

GPW 1929 Geneva Conve ntion Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of Wa r , 27 July 1929. +

GWS 1929 Geneva Conve ntion for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick of Armies in the Field, 27 July 1929.

H. III Hague Convention No. Ill Relative to the Ooening of Hostilities. 18


10/294/29/2012 14

h Tc>. 1Editor http://us.mg4.rnail.yahoo.cornlneo/ lawlch?.rand=fe21 k

October 1907.

IV Hague Convention No. IV Respectin g the Laws a nd Customs of Waron Land, 18 October 190 7.

HR Annex to Hague Convention No. IV, 18 October 1907 , embodying the Regulation s Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land.

H. V Hague Convention No. V Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land , 18 October 1907.

H./X Hague Convention No. IX concerning Bombardment by Nava l Forces in Time ofWar , 18 October 1907.

H. X Hague Convention No: X for the Adaptation to Maritime Warfare of the Principles of the Geneva Co nventio n , 18 October 190 7.

Roerich Pact Treaty on the Protection of Artistic and Scientific Institution s and Historic Monuments , 15 April 1935.

UCMJ Uniform Code ofMilitary Justice (64 Stat. 108; 50 U.S. C. 55 1-7 36).

FM 27 -10 Appendix A- vii

I, My Wife and our Children are Victims/Witnesses a nd The ALMIGHTY CREATOR , The God of

Abraham , Isaac and Jacob witnes s our Oath ' s, Wherefore; we , being under a Solemn Oath by Heaven thatour Testimony is true , correct and correct to the best of our knowledge , understanding, experiences and

belief , Testifier of the TRUTH as previously submitted before this Court as evidenc ed under " The Rome

Statute" under the Jurisdiction , Criminal Pr ovision s, Express Aut hori ty, Professed and Criminally

Dele gated Moral Duties , including the Higher Obligations , of this Honorable World Crimina l Court's long

awaited issued criminal File Reference OTP -CR-237/ll Honorable International Criminal Court

(I.C.C.) , for the purposes of making this , my second (2nd) "Sworn Statement" presenting further

evidence and my second (2"d) "Req uest" for other and further matter s, pursuant to: "T he Rome Statute"

including. the following: 1) Requested Relief as stated previously and again as shown below ; and 2)

Statement of Vio latio ns, to wit:

2) Statement of Vio lations below arc as follows, to wit:


11/29

Ch Iext bd1to http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.contlneo/ launch?.rand=fe21 k

of 24 4/29/201 2 1

A r tic leS Cr im es within the ju ri sd ict ion of the Cou r t

The jurisdiction of the Court shall b e limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the

international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect

to the following crimes:

(a) The crime of genocide ;

(b) Crimes against humanity;(c) War crimes ; (d) The crime of aggression.

A. Artic le 6 Ge nocide

For the purpose of this Statute, "g enocide " means any of the following acts committed with intent

to destroy , in whole or in part , a national, ethnical, racial or r eligious group , as such:

(a) Killing members of the group ;

(b) Causing serious bodi ly or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physicaldestruction in whole or in part ;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group ; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group; and

B. Artic le 7 Cr im es agai nst hu m a n i ty

For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" mea ns any of the following acts when

committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian populatio n, with

knowledge of the attack:

(a) Murder ; (b) Exterminatio n;(c) Enslavement ; (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of populatio n ; (e) Impr isonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamenta l rulesof international law; (f) Torture ; (g) Rape , sexual s lavery , enforced prostitution , forced pregnanc y, enforced sterilization. or anyother form of sexual vio lence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political , racial , national , ethnic , cultura l, r eligious , gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other ground s that are universallyrecognized as impermissible under international la w, in connection with any act referred to in this

paragraph or an y crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; (i) Enforced disappearance of persons ; (j) The crime of aparthei d ; (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionall y causing great suffering , or serious injury to body or to mental or phys ical health ; and


12/29

11 1c::xLr .uuor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=te21 ka

of24 4/29/20 12 I

... ... .... .... .. .

2) For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving themultiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population , pursuant toor in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit suc h attack; (b) "Extermination" includ es the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia t hedeprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to brin g about the destruction of part of a

popu lation ; (c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right ofownership over a person and includes the exe rcise of such power in the course of trafficking in

persons , in particular women and children; (d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of popu lation" means forced dis plac ement of the per so nsconcerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfull y pr ese nt,without grounds permitted under international law; (c) "Torture" means the intentional infliction of seve re pain or sufferin g, whether physical ormental , upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; exce pt that torture shallnot includ e pain or sufferin g arising only from, inherent in or incidental to , lawful sanctions; (f) "Forced pregnancy" means the unlawful confinement of a woman forcibly made pregnant , with

the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other graveviolations of international Jaw. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted as affectingnational law s relating to pregnancy ; (g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental right s contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity; (h) 'The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in

paragraph 1 , committed in the co ntext of an institutionalized regime of systematic opp r ession anddomination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with theintention of maintaining that regime; Rome Statute of the Internationa l Criminal Court

(i) "Enforced disappearance of per sons" m eans the arrest , detention or abduction of persons by,or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of , a State or a political organizat ion , followed

by a refusa l to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to giv e information on the fate orwhereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the lawfor a prolonged period of time.

Artic le 8 2 War crimes

1) The Co urt shall ha ve jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or polic y or as part of a large-scale commission of such cr imes.

2) For the purpo se of this Sta tute , "war crimes" means:

(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Convention s of 12 August 1949 , nam ely, any of the f ollowin g actsagainst person s or prope rty protected und er the provisions of the relevant Geneva Co nvention:

(i) Willful killing; (ii) Tortur e or inhuman treatment, including biological ex perim ents; (ii i) Willfully caus ing great suffering , or serious injury to body or healt h; (iv) Exten sivedestruction and appropriation of property , not j ustified b y military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonl y;

; ,..


13/29

h Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/ latmch?.r and=te21 k

f 24 4/29/2012 I

(vi) Willfully depnvmg a pnsoner of war or oth er protected p erson o1 the nghts o1 tau and r egulartrial ri (vii) Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; (viii) Taking of hostages.

(b) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international arm ed conflict, withinthe established framework of international law, namely , any ofthe following acts:

(i) Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civiliansnot taking direct part in hostilities;

(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against civilian object s, that is, objects which are not militaryobjectives;

(iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss oflife or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread , long-term and severe damage tothe natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and directoverall military advantage anticipated;

(v) Attacking or bombardin g, by whatever means , towns , villages, dwellings or buildings which areundefended and which are not military objective s;

(viii) The transfer , directly or indirectly , by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupie s, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the populationof the occupied territory within or outside this territory;

(x) Subjecting persons who are in the power of an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medicalor scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical , dental or hospitaltreatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest , and which cause death to or

seriously endanger the health of such p erson or persons ;

(xi) Subjecting persons who are in the power of another party to the conflict to physical mutilation orto medical or scientific experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical , dental orhospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest , and which causedeath to or seriously endanger the health of such person or persons ;

(xii) Declaring that no quarter will be given;

(xiii) Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperativelydemanded by the necessities of war;

(xiv) Declaring abolished , suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of thenationals of the hostile party;

(xv) Compelling the nationals of the hostile party to take part in the operations of war directedagainst their own country , even if they were in the belligerent's service before the comm encement ofthe war;

(xvi) Pillaging a town or place , even when taken by assault;


14/29

Text Editor http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.comfneo /launch?.rand=fe21 k

f 24 4/29/2012 1

(xvii) Employing poison or poisoned weapons;

(xviii) Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materialsor devices;

(xx) Employing weapon s, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature tocause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indi scriminate in violation

of the international law of armed conflict , provided that such weapons , projectiles and material andmethods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex tothis Statute , by an amendment in accordance with the r elevant provisions set forth in article s 121 and 123;

(xxi) Committing outrages upon personal dignit y, m particular humiliating and degradingtreatment ;

(xxii) Committing .... , as defined in article 7, paragraph 2 (f), enforced sterilization , or an y otherform of sexual violence also constituting a grave breach of the Geneva Convention s;

(xxiii) Utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to render certain points , areas ormilitary forces immune from military operation s;

(xxv) Intentionally using starvation of ci vilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objectsindispensable to their survival , including willfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under theGeneva Convention s;

(c) In the case of an armed conflict not of an international characte r , serious violations of article 3common to the four G eneva Con ventions of 12 August 1949 , namely , any of the following actscommitted against persons taking no active part in the hostilities , including members of armed forceswho have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness , wounds , detention or any

other cause:

(i) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatmentand torture; (ii) Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degradingtreatment; (iii) Taking of hostages ; (iv) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment

pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which aregenerally recognized as indispensable.

(d) Paragraph 2 (c) applies to armed conflicts not of an international character and thus does not applyto situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riot s, isolated and sporadic acts of violence orother acts of a similar nature.

(e) Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an internationalcharacter, within the established framework of international law , namel y, any of the following acts:

(i) Intentionally directing attacks again st the civilian population as such or against individualcivilians not taking direct part in hostilities ;


15/29

h Text Edito r http:// us.mg4.rna i l .yahoo.com/neo/la unch?.r and=fe21 k

4/29/201 2of 24

(iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations , material , units or vehiclesinvolved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mi ssion in accordance with the Charterof the United Nations , as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilianobjects under the international law of armed conflict ;

(iv) Intentionall y directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art ,science or charitable purposes, historic monument s, hos pital s and place s where the sick andwounded are collected, provided they are not military ob jectives ;

(v) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault ;

(vi) Committin g... , as defined in Article 7, paragraph 2 (f) , enforced sterilization, and anyother form of sexual violence also constituting a serious violation of article 3 common to thefour Geneva Convention s; (viii) Ord ering the displacement of the civilian population for reasons related to the conflict,unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand ;

(ix) Killing or wounding treacherously a comb a tant a dver sar y ;

(x) Declaring that no quarter will be given;

(xi) Subjecting persons who are in the power of another party to the conflict to physicalmutilation or to medical or scientific experiment s of any kind which are neither justified bythe medic al, dental or hospital treatment of the per son concerned nor carried out in his or herinterest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person or perso ns;

(xii) De stroying or seizing the property of an adversary unless such destruction or seizure beimperatively demanded by the necessities of the conflict ;

(xiii) Employing poison or poisoned weapo ns; (xiv) Employing asphyxiating , poisonous or other gase s, and all analogou s liquids, materials ordevices ;

(t) Par agrap h 2 (e) a ppli es to armed conflic ts not of an int ernational c har ac ter a nd thu s does no t a p plyto situations of internal dist ur ban ces and t ensions, such as r iots , iso lated a nd spo r adic acts of violence o rother acts of a simil ar natur e. It a pplies to ar med confl icts that take place in t he terr itory of a S tate w henthere is protracted armed co nfl ict betwee n governme ntal au thor ities and organize d arme d grou ps or

between such groups.

3. No thing in paragra ph 2 (c) and (e) sha ll affect t he respo nsi bility of a Gove rnm ent to ma inta in orre-establish law a nd order in the State o r to def end th e un ity and te r rito rial in tegrity of the State, by alllegi tima te means.

Article 8 bi s3 Crime of aggression

1. fo r the p urpose of t his Statute, cr ime of aggression " mea ns t he p lanning, prepara tion, ini tia tion orexec utio n, by a per son in a pos it ion effectively to exe r cise control over or to dir ec t the political or milit aryr.tinn nf St:ltP. nf n r. t n f ooTs sinn whi r.h h v i ts r. hM r. tP.r PT vitv nrl sr. I P. r.nn s titnt P.smni fP.st


16/294/29/201 2of 24

h TextEditor http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/ launch?.rand =te21 k

---- .......- - -- , -..;.-.-.. -- ..... ... -eo- ---- ........... .... J .... .... - - - - - , 0'"'- .... J -- - -- - , .... .... .. .._ ........ _ .. _ _ - ...... .__ .. _ ...........

violat ion of the Charter of the United Nat ions .

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1 , "ac t of aggre ss ion" means the u se of armed force by a State against thesovere ignty , territorial integrity or political independence of another State , or in any other mannerinconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. Any of the following acts , regardless of a declarationof war, shall , in accordance with United Natio ns General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974 , qualifY as an act of aggression:

(a) Th e invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State , or a nymilitary oc c upation , howev er temporary , r esultin g from such in vasion or attack, or any annexation bythe u se of force of the territ ory of anoth er State or part ther eo f ;

(b) Bomb ardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of anyweapons by a State against the territory of another State;

(d) An attack by the armed forces of a Sta te on the land , sea or a ir force s, or marine and air f l eets ofanother State ;

(e) Th e use of arme d forces of one State w hich are wit hin the terr itory of a nother State with theagreement of the receiving Sta te , in co ntr aven tion of the condition s provided for in the agreement orany extension of their pr esence in such territory beyond the termination of the agree ment;

(f) The act ion of a State in allowing its territor y, whic h it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State ;

(g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands , groups , irregulars or mercenaries , whichcarry out acts of a r med force aga i nst another State of such gravity as to amount t o the acts listed above ,or its substantial involvement therein.

3 Inse r ted bv r eso lu tion RC!Re s. 6 ofll June 2010.

- A rticle 9 Elemen ts of C ri mes

1. Elements of Crimes shall assist the Court in the interpretation and app lication of articles 6, 7, 8 and 8 bis. They shall be adopted by a two- third s majority of the members of the Assem b ly of Sta tes Partie s.

2. Amendments to the Elements of Crimes ma y be proposed by:

(a) Any State Party;

(b) The judges acting by an abso lute majority ;(c) The Pr osecutor. Such amendments shall be adopted by a two-third s major ity of the memb er s of the Assembly of Sta tes Parties.

3. The Elements of Crimes and amendm ents thereto shall b e cons is tent with this Statu te.

Article 10
http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.cornlnco/launch?.rand=te21


17/294/29/20 12 Iof24

Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/ launch'?.rand= tc21 k

No thing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in any way existing or deve lopingrules of internationa l law for purpo ses other than thi s Sta tute .

A rti cle llJur isdi c tion r at io n e te mpo r is

1. The Court has juri sdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of thi s Statute.

2. I f a State become s a Party to th is Statute after ils entry into force , the Court ma y exercise its jurisdictiononly with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of this Statute for that State. unle ss thatSta te has made a declaration und er article 12 , paragraph 3.

A rticl e 12 Pr econditi ons to t he exe rcise of juri sdicti on

1. A State which become s a Party to this Statute ther e by accepts the juri sdiction of t he Court with resp ec tto the crimes refetTed to in article 5.

2. In the case of article 13, paragraph (a) or (c), the Co urt may exercise its jur isdiction if one or mor e ofthe following States are Parti es to this Statute or have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court in accordancewith paragraph 3:

(a) The State on the territory of which the conduct in question occurred or, if the crime was committedon board a vessel or aircraft , the State of regist r ation of that vessel or aircraft ; ( b) The S tate of w hich the person accused of the crim e is a national.

3. If the acceptance of a State which is not a Par ty to this Statute is requir ed und er paragraph 2, that Sta temay, by declaratio n lodged wit h the Registrar , accept the exercise of jurisdict ion by the Court with respectto the crime in quest ion. Th e accepting State shall c oope rate wit h the Court without any delay or exceptionin accordance wit h Part 9.

4 As a mended b y reso lution R C!Res .6 of 11June 2010 (inser ting the r ef e r enc e to a r ticle 8 bi s).

Complaint and Request for Assistance from this International TribunaL as a result of my loca l Stateand Federal Authoritie s e ithe r ; 1 ) have failed to render aid/or; 2) they have Refused to render aid. It ismy understanding this gives this Internationa l Criminal Court jurisdiction and authority to "ACT'' (See:Art icle 1 7), pursuant to "The Rom e Sta tu te" Complaining " Wi t ness' & V ictim s"' have previou slysubmitted other official government document s, Government Licensed Professional's Lab Reports whichtestify to the Nat ionally and Internationally " Ba nned Chemic al W eap o ns of Mass De st ruction (W M D 's)

and their " Banne d Deli very Devic e(s)" were found in comp lainants(s) fence enclosed back yard of theirfam ily(s) home.

It is a lso worthy of note that the United Sta tes is a membe r who both signed the C hemica l Weapo ns C on ve ntion Treaty and thereafter ratified the same, to wit:

"United States January 13. 1993 April 25. 1997 Ratification April 29. 1997"

The Organization has failed to meet or comply with the Articles of its own Polic y and Procedures , which is
http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch%27?.rand=tc21


18/29

Te xt Editor http://us .mg4.ma i l .yahoo.co rnlneo / l a unch?.rand =fe2 1 k

4/29/201 2 1f 24

laid out belo w, in great detail , and who is now equally liable and responsible as a result of havingknowledge of the crimes and by their failure to act and/or report the In ternational Banned Cri minal Use ofChemical Weapons (WMD ' s) and by their failure to stop and render aid/assistance, makes them a" Conspirator " to the crime itself. i.e. "He who has knowledge of a crime and stood by and did nothing isas guilty as he w ho did the crime itself ... He is a Conspirator under the RICO Statutes , and in the presentcase The Organization , including it' s, to wit:

"Article XIV. Settlement of Disputes

I. Dis putes that ma y ari se conc ernin g the application or the int erpret at ion of this Con venti on sha ll b e settled inaccordanc e with the rele vant pro v is ion s of thi s Convention and in conformit y w ith tb e prov isions of th e Charter of theUnit ed Na tions.

2. When a di s put e a r ises betwee n two or mor e Stat es Parti es, or betwee n on e o r mor e Sta tes Parties a nd the Organizat ion, r elatin g to th e interpr eta tion or applic a tion of thi s Con vention , the parties conc erned shall co nsul t together with a vi ew tothe expeditious senlement o f the dis pute by nego ti ation or by other peaceful m eans of the parti es' choice, includin g r ecour se to a ppropri ate or gans of thi s Convention a nd, by mutual consent , r ef erral to the Int ernational Court of Justice in

conformity with th e Statut e of th e Co urt. The S tates Parties invo l ved s ha ll kee p th e Executi ve Coun cil inf ormed of actions being tak e n.

3. The Executive Council may contribute to the settlement of a dispute by whatev er means it d eems appropriate ,including offering its good offices , calling upon the States Parties to a dispute to start the settlement proce ss of the irchoice and recotmnending a time limit for any agreed procedure.

4.The Conference shall consider questions related to disputes r aised by State s Parties or brought to its attention by theExecutive Council. The Conference shall , as it finds necessar y, establish or entrust organs with tasks related to the

settlement of these d isputes in conform ity with Art -icle Yin , pa r agraph 21 (0.

5. The Conference and the Executive Council are separately empowered , subject to authorization from the GeneralAssembly of the Unit ed Nations , to request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal

question arising within th e scope of th e activitie s of the Organization . An agreement between th e Organization and theUnited Nations shall be concluded for this purpose in accordance with Article Vlll , paragraph 34 (a). 6. This Article is without pr e judice to Article IX or to the provisions on measures to redress a situation and to ensure compliance , including sanction s.

And goes on further to state:

" 8. Each State Party has the right to request an d, s ubject to the procedure s set forth in paragraphs 9. I 0 and II , toreceive assistance and protection against the use or threat of use of chemica] weapons if it considers that:

(a) Chemical weapons have been used against it;

(b) Riot control agents have been used against it as a method of warfare ; or

(c) It is threatened by actions or activities of any State that are prohibited for States Parties by Article I. "

And as pre viously stated Articles X, Sections 9 , 10 and 11 states as follows , to wit:


19/29

h !ext J::dttor http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.com/nco/ launch?.rand=fe21 k

4/29/2012 Iof24

9. TI1erequest, substantiated by relevant information, shall be s ubmitted to the Director-General, who shall transmit itimmediately to the Executive Council and to all States Partie s. The Director-General shall immediately forward therequest to States Parties which have volunteered. in accordance with paragraphs 7 (b) and (c). to dispatch emergencyassistance in case of use of chemical weapons or use of riot control agents as a method of warfare, or humanitarianassistance in case of serious threat of use of chemical weapons or serious threat of use of riot control agents as a methodof warfare to the State Party concerned not later than 12 hours after receipt of the reque st. The Director-General shallinitiate, not later than 24 hours after receipt of the request, an investigation in order to provide foundation for furtheraction. He shall complete the investigation within 72 hours and forward a report to the Executive ColUlcil. If additionaltime is required for completion of the investigation, an interim report shaH be submitted within the same time-frame. Theadditional time required for investigation shall not exceed 72 hours. It may, however, be further ex1ended by similar

periods. Repor ts at the end of each additional period shall be submitted to the Executive Council. The invest igation shall . as appropriate and in confom1ity wit11 the request and the information accompanying the request, establish relevantfacts related to the request as well as the type and scope of supplementary assistance and protection needed. t 0.1l1e Executive Council shall meet not later than 24 hours after receiving an investigation report to consider t11e sitllation and shall take a decision by simple majority within the following 24 hours on whether to instruct the TechnicalSecretariat to provide supplementary assistance.The Technical Sec retariat shall immediately transmit to all States Parties and relevant international organizations the investigation report and the decision taken by d1e Executive ColUlcil. When so decided by the Executive ColUlcil, the Director-General shaH provide assistance immediately. For tllis purpose, theDirector -General may cooperate with the requesting State Party. other States Parties and relevant internationalor ganizations. The States Parties shall make the fullest possible effo rts to provide as sistance. II. If the information available from the ongoing investigation or other reliable sources would give sufficient proof that tllere are victims of use of chemical weapons and immediate action is indispensable, the Director-General shall notifYallStates Parties and shall take emergency measures of assistance, using the resources the Conference has placed at hisdisposal for such contingencies. The Director-General shall keep the Executive Council informed of actions undertaken pursuant to this paragraph."

I will quote other Articles along w idl their applicable sections for further Wlderstanding of the obligations of theDir ector-General, d1e Execu tive ColUlcil and the United Nat ions General Assembly and d1e Un ited Nations Security Counc il orother parties as mentioned in the chain of command so stated in the treaty, including d1e provisions of Art icl e XIT, to wit:

"Article XII. Measures to Redress a Situation and to Ensure Compliance, Including Sanctions

t. The Conference shall take the necessary measures, as set ford1in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, to ensure compliance witll thisConvention and to redress and remedy any situation which contravenes the provisions of this Convention. In cons ideringactio n pursuant to dlis paragraph. the Conference shall take into accolmt all infom1ation and recommendations on the issues submitted by the Executive ColUlc il.

2. In cases where a State Party has been r equested by the Execut i ve Council to take measures to redress a situation raising problems with r egard to its compliance, and where the State Party fails to fulfil me request within the s pecified time, theConference may, inter a lia, upon dlCrecommendation of the Executive Council, restrict or suspend the State Party's rightsand privileges under this Convention until it undertakes the necessary action to conform with its obligations

Wlder thisConvent ion.

3. In cases where serious damage to the object and purpose of this Convention may r esult from activities prohibited w1derthis Convention, in particu lar by Article I, the Conference may r ecommend collective measures to States Parties in rnnfnrmitv with intC'rnl'llinnl'll ll'lw


20/29

Tell.t Edi tor http:/ /us.mg4.mail.yaho o.com/neo /launch?.rand =fe21 k

4/29/201 2 1f24

4. The Conference shall , in cases of particular grav i ty, bring the is sue , including relevant information and conc l usions , tothe attention of the Uni ted Nations Genera l Assemb l y and the United Nations Security Council ."

"Article X. Assistance and Protection against Chemical Weapons

1. For the purposes of this Article , "Assistance" means the coord i nation and delivery to States Parties of protection against chemical weapon s, incl udi ng, inter al ia, the follow i ng: detection equipment and alarm systems; protective equipment; decontan 1inationequipmen t and decontaminants; med ica l antidote s and treatments; and advice on any of these protective measures. 2. Nothing in this Convention sha l l be interpreted as impeding the right of any State Party to conduct research into , develop,

produce , acquire , transfer or use means of protection against chemical weapons , for purposes not prohibited under thisConvention.

3. Each State Party Lmdertakes to facilitate, and shall have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment ,material and sc ientific and techno l og ical information concerning means of protection against chemical weapo ns. 4. For the purposes of increasing the transparency of nationa l programmes re l ated to protective purposes , each State Party shall

prov ide annua ll y to the Technica l Secretariat information on i ts programme , in accordance w ith procedures to be considered and approved by the Conference pursuant to Article vm, paragraph 21 (i). 5. The Technical Secretaria t shal l estab l ish, not later than 180 days after entry into force of this Convention and maintain , for the

use of an y requesti ng State Party, a data bank containing freely available i nformation concerning various means of protection aga i nst chem ical weapons as well as such i nformation as may be provided by States Parties . The Technical Secre tar iat shall also , within the resources avai I able to it, and at the request of a State Part y, provide expert adviceand assist the State Party in identifYi ng how its programmes for the development and improvement of a protective capac i ty againstchemical weapons could be i mplemented . 6. Nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted as impeding the right of States Part ies to request and provide assistance

b i later ally and to conc lude i ndividual agreements with other States Parties concerning the emergency procurement of assistance. 7. Each State Party undertakes to provide assistance through the Organ i zation and to this end to elect to take one or more of thefollow ing measures : (a) To contribute to the vo l untary fund for assistance to be establ ished by the Conference at its first session; (b) To conclude, ifpossible not later than 180 days after this Convention enters into force for it, agreem ents with the Organizationconcerning the procurement, upon demand , of assistance;

(c) To declare , not later than 180 days after this Convention enter s into force for it, the kind of assistance it might provide inresponse to an appeal by the Organ ization. If, however , a State Party subsequently is unable to provide the assistance envisaged inits declaration, it is still under the obligation to provide assistance in accordance with this paragraph. 8. Each State Party has the right to request and, subject to the procedures set forth in paragraphs 9, I 0 and 11 , to receiveassistance and protection against the use or threat of use of chemical weapons if it cons iders that: (a) Chemica l weapons have been used against it; (b) Ri ot co ntrol agents have been used against it as a method of warfare; or (c) It is threatened by actions o r activities of any State that are prohibited for States Parties by Article L. 9. The request, substantiated by re levant information, sha ll be subm i tted to the Director -General, who shall transmit it immed iately to the Executive Counci l and to all States Partie s. The Director-General shall immediately forward the request toStates Parties which have vo l unteer ed , in accordance with paragraphs 7 (b) and (c) , to dispatch emerge ncy as s istance in case ofuse of chemical weapons or use of riot control agents as a method of warfure , or humani tar ian assistance in case of serious threat

of use of chemica l weapons or ser ious threat of use of riot control age nts as a method of warfure to the State Party concerned notlater than 12 hours after receipt of the request. The Director-General shall initiate , not later than 24 hours after receipt of therequest, an investigation in order to provide foundation for further action. He shall complete the investigation within 72 hours andforward a report to the Executive Council. If additional ti me is required for completion of the investigatio n, an interim report shall

be submitted within the same time- frame . The ad d i tional time required for investigation shall not exceed 72 hours . It may,howeve r , be further extended by similar periods. Reports at the end of each additional pe r iod shall be submitt ed to the Executiv eCounc i l. The investigation shall , as appropriate and in conformity with the request and the information accompanying the request,establish relevant facts related to the request as well as the type and scope of s upplementary assi stance and protection needed. 10 . The Executive Counci l shall meet not l ater than 24 hours after receiving an investigation report to consider the situation and shall take a dec isio n by simple majority with in the fo llowing 24 hours on whether to instruct the Tech ni cal Secretariat to provide


21/29

h !ext Edttor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.convneo/ law1ch?.rand=fe21k

of24 4/29/20 12 II

supplementary assistance. The Technical Secretariat shall immediately transmit to all States Parties and relevant internationalorganizations the investigation report and the decision taken by the Executive Council. When so decided by the Executive Council,the Director-General shall provide assistance inuncdiately. For thls purpose, the Director -General may cooperate with therequesting State Party, other States Parties and relevant international organizations. TI1eStates Parties shall make thefullest possible efforts to provide assistance. I 1. If the information available from the ongoing investigation or other reliable sources would give sufficient proof that there arevictims of use of chemical weapons and immediate action is indispensable, the Director -General shall notifyall States Parties andshall take emergency measures of assistance, using the resources the Conference has placed at his disposal for such contingencies.The Director-General shall keep the Executive Council informed of actions undertaken pursuant to t11is paragraph."

(See: Treaty Document 101-6 , 101 81 Congress, First Ses sion, and Lette r of Transmittal , from the White House , November 8, 1989, signed by George Bush)

Other and further ev idence previously presented in Toxin Poison Te st Results, performed by aGovernment Licensed personnel and laboratories was indicative of "OFF THE CHART HIGHLEVELS" of a toxic chemical po ison known as: "THE KING OF POISONS a nd THE POISON OFKI NGS" also known as "TH E INHERITANCE MAKER, etc.," (i.e. Arsenic Poisoning). Complainant (s)evidenced photographically , and further included Expert Opines on the Tortuously Brutal & Mutilatingaffect's and effect 's on the human body would be, as directl y caused by "Chemica l Weapons (WMD's)" ,and the photographed injuries are in compliance with known injuries resulting from the Said King ofPoisons as documented history shows: "After World War 1, the United States built up a stockpile of 20,000tons of lewisite (ClCH =CHAsCh), a chem ical weapon that is a vesicant (blister agent) and lun!lirritant ." (See: http: //en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni )

As stated above , notice is given her ein, this communication sha ll be made a permanent part of thefiles of my prior submissions, both, by complaint and Request for Assistance, which has been placed in the

permanent Registry of this International Criminal Court, who has iss ued in r eference to my family, thefollowing: "I.C.C. Reference OTP-CR -237/11 " w hich was assigned and mailed to Comp lainant. Witnessand Victim, and mailed the same to me, the above stated comp lainant , per a response letter from Head ofInformation & Evidence U nit, Office of the Prosecutor , dated October 10,2011.

With regards to the United States or Texas State where I/we live and for which are to be inmandatory compljance with In ternationa l Tre aty's and agreements of the United States, and must bringtheir own National laws in complia nce with International Treaty Obligations. They are further inknowledge of the injuries and have either, failed to , or refused to stop and/or prevent said criminal wrongs,and have either, fa iled to , or refused to stop and render support, a id, protection. antidotes, nor has there

been any attempts to redr ess these matters with our family. But rather, from the top to the bottom, theevidence clearly shows bad faith , unclean hand s, and other criminal acts, such as:

Willful blindness (sometimes called igno rance of law, willful ignor a nce or contrived ignoranc e

or Ne lson ian knowled ge) is a term used in law when an individual seeks to avoid civil or criminalliabilit y for a wrongful act by intentionally putting himself in a position where he will be unawareof facts which would render him liable.

For example , in cases suc h as the present case, where officers, agents , employees , etc., of the

Courts, policing authoriti es, governmen t prosecutors. local stntc Polic e/Constables, Federal and

International Agents, police and the like being presented with evidence or having received complaints, and
http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)http://en.wikipcdia.org/wiki/Arscni)


22/29

Text Editor http:// us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.com/neo/ launch?.rand=fe21 k

f24 4/29/2012 1

abandoned those injured is criminally negligent for Willful blindness and therefore cannot claim plausible

deniability How could they NOT do something , how could those under oaths and affirmations have

knowledge and yet fail to stop and render a id, support , comfort or protection like this?

How could they stand by and do nothing when they know people /citizens are injured by banned

biological and chemical weapons and knowing that they have a duty to prevent such a thing , and knowing

they failed to prevent said crimes committed against the people /citizens , they double victimize them, by

failing to stop and render aid as their bodies , minds and lives are being destroyed?

If a father , mother and child are being tortured to death in front of you , and you have the means to

stop it, how could you just stand there and watch? Unless you are a sociopath , you would do something .

In fact , to have knowledge in any manner or by any means whatsoever , or having firsthand

knowledge and evidence that people have been both , physically and mentall y torture d , harmed, injure d,

hurt , killed, murdered, or having knowledge of criminals having attempted to murder people , etc.,

resulting from cr imin al acts committed against a people /citizen , or having personal knowledge based on

evidence or sworn testimon y asserted by the victims , but you do nothin g other than stand by , waiting for

them to die is a felony crime and abandonn1ent to have knowledge , yet remain standing and

watching/observing on the sidelines and failing to render aid , support and the like pretending to be blind to

the facts and the truth of the criminal offenses , to wit:

" Such defenses have not succeeded , as courts have been quick to determine that the defendant should have known what was exercised criminal recklessness by failing to find out. (See: In re Aimster Copyright Litigation , 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003)"

However the reality of the matter , is one much more dis-heartening than a people would or could

handle , due to the comp lexity of a weapons system that is so genius in its design , its science so well

perfected and defmed , so highly sophisticated in its implementation that it can literally control the mind,

and do so to such an extent that it 's soldier s can literally tell you the thoughts which you believed we yours

were mine, induced upon you via satellite , Radio, Television , Cable, Internet and even your fax and phone

line. Psychological Warfare is the weapons system used to control the masses via powerful suggestion and

hypno tization. As previously stated there are those who have this science down to a level/degree of


23/29

h Text Editor http://us.mg4.mai l.yahoo.convneo/ launch?.rand=fe21 k

4/29/2012 Iof24

perfection that it qualities itself as a working tool of mystery Babylon herself, whose enjoying its s ucce ss

beyond her wildest dreams.. How this mystery weapon is being wielded , is evidenced clearly in Armv

Field Manual No. 33 -1-1 CFM 33-1-1) (HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Washington, DC , 5 May 1994) "PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS TECHNIQUES AND

PROCEDURES" Every man should be aware of and should read this this Manual, but it contains a

DISTRIBUTION RESTR ICTION. Therefore, I am unable to provide this International Criminal Tribunal

with a copy of the entire manual. Due to this restriction an attempt has been made to prevent disclosure of

contents or reconstruction of the document. Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only to

protect technical or ope r ational information from automatic dissemination under the International

Exc hange Program or by o ther means. This determination was made on 6 Dec e mb er 1991. Other requests

for thi s document will be referred to: (Commande r , U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center

and Sc hool , ATTN: AOJK -DT-DM , Fort Bragg , NC 28307 -5000.)

Wherefore, no man is justified, nor excused as a result of hi s Fraud and Deceit , but rath er, he

him self should be excused! Any attempt to conceal unlawful acts by those entrusted with limited powers

and aut horit ies, which by right , belong to the Sovere ign People! But when illegally done for purpose s of

not only doing what they are not autho rized to do. but doing what they are absolutely prohibited from

do i ng , by so doing have dishonorably d ischarge d themselves.

Furthermore, when any man commits felony cr iminal acts, w hich violates basic fundamental Laws,

which acts prove in jurious to all mankind Universally and fo r which Cr imin a l and Heinous Acts constitute

vio lations of the Law of Nat ions, the Laws of Nature and Natures God. is no authority at all! By acting

beyond ones authority, a soldier uses a restricted classification for the purposes of undermining the Law of

the Land, the Law of Nat ion s and Laws of War , regardless of rank, position or tile , it is a wrong to conceal

criminal acts being committed and is obstruction of the administration of Justice, to concea l acts which are

otherw ise prohibited , both under National and International Law s, Rules , Regulations , Treaty 's, etc., which

undennines the clean hand s and good fa ith doctrines , resulting from their preconceived and premeditated

fraud, coercion, mass deception, delusions and the like.

Why is this done then? Only so evil men can break their oath(s) and affirmation(s) due and owing

to th eir Home Land , their respective Laws/Constitution s, and the people /cit izen s of said Home Land. One


24/29

h TextEditor http://us.rng4.mail.yahoo.comlneo/launch?.rand-:fe21 k

4/29/201 2 1of24

can t ctaun to oe nonora01e , wnen rrauautentty ctamung wnne to oe macK ana tl1acK to oe wrure. ror

honor is earned by honesty and integrity and not mere ly by the co lor of the cloth one wears .

A ma n must expatria te himse lf or be dishonorably discharged prior to his involvement with other

foreign aliens to strike against his own people! Such criminal and felonious acts constitute state sponsored

terrorism, by those attempting to promo te and instill fear into a population and confll11ling those fears by a

Nations use of death squads to systemat ica lly murder, attempt to murder, or inflict or attempt to inflict

death , or to inflict great physica l and/or psyc hological harm bodily harm. It is criminal to knowingly and

inte ntionally inflict great bodily injury and damage upon a pe r son or group of persons , because of their

being a religious , racial , ethnic , or political group / people /c i tizenry of a nations own people / population

/citizenry.

It is a fur ther crimina lly pro hibited act of Terro rismto dece ive and psychologically undermine a

person or group of persons through fear and intimidation instilling said group and/or people w ith fearwhic h by its very design, is meant to cause anx iety and remove the peace of mind , of a peo p le , a lready

suffering from chemical poison attacks which took place to them in their own homes in the middle of the

night. The menta l and physica l anguish , injury harm and damages are only compounded when upon

know ledge of Army Field Ma n ua ls, which state as fo llows:

" In this manual , the word "o pp o ne nt " a pplie s to gr o up s or individual s who a r e e n gage d inconfli c t-milit ary, p oliti cal , or otb e nvi se-w ith the U nited Sta tes, wh e th e r o r not wa r has b ee nform a lly d eclare d ."

It is worthy of note as to this type of activ ities are being conducted on an international level, to w i t:

" The provi s ion s of thi s public a tion arc the subject of the int e rn a tional ag reement s li ste d inthe r ef e r e nc es. "

The fact that the instant case invo lves International violations prohibiting attacks by a

nat ions/states military on its own people /citizenry. It is further Internationally prohibiting the use of

Banned Le thal Chemical Weapons and has furt her Banned their de livery devices in vio lation of long

established arms d isarmament agreements , nationa l and international treaty obligations , not merely

prohibiting the use of such WMD's, but also prohib its the manufacturing, stockpiling, storage facilities ,

delivery devices, etc., yet as c lea rly shown and sta ted in "A rm y Sp ecial Operations Fo rce s"

elijah

(S ee : Ar my Field M anual No. 3- 05 (100-25 ) 2006 E dition ) at pages:

C O UNTE R TE RRORI SM


25/29

Text Editor http://us.mg4.mail.yahoo.comlneo/Jaunch?.rand=fc21 k

4/29 /2012 IIf24

2-17. JP 1-02 defmes counterterrorism (CT) as operations that include the offensive measures taken to prevent , dete r , preempt, and respond to terrorism. ARSOF possess the capability to conduct theseoperations in environments that may be denied to conventional forces because of political or threatconditions. 2-1 8. HN responsibilities, Department of Justice and Department of State lead agency authority , legal and

political restriction s, and appropriate DOD directives limit ARSOF involvement in CT. ARSO F 's role andadded capability is to conduct offensive measures within DOD 's overall combating terrorism efforts.ARSO F conduct CT missions as SO by covert, clandestine , or lo w- visibility means. ARSOF activitieswithin CT include , but are not linlitcd to-

Intelligence operation s, to collect , exploit , and report infonnation on terrorist organizations , personnel, assets , and activities. ARSOF have the capability to conduct these operations in anovert , covert, or clandestine manner.

Network and infrastructure attacks , to preempt strikes against terrorist organizations. Theobjective is to destroy, disorganize, or disarm terrorist organizations before they can strike targetsof national interest. :5Hostage or sensitive materiel recovery , to rescue hostages or to recover sensitive materiel from terrorist control. These activities require capabilities not normally found in conventional militaryunits. Ensuring the safety of the hostages and preventing destruction of the sensitive materiel areessential mission requirements.

Nonlethal activitie s, to defeat the ideologies or motivations that spawn terrorism by nonlethalmeans . These activities could include, but are not limited to , PSYOP , 10 , CAO , UW, and FID.

Note. Most CT activities are classified. Further discussion of CT is beyond the scope of this publication.

These Manuals clearly promote International Violations of Crinlinal Law , such as forced relocations anddislocations of a person or group of persons, to wit: DISLOCATION 1-44. ARSOF can dislocate the enemy force from chosen position s, either by forcing it to move from these

positions or by rendering its strength useless or irrelevant to the fight. DA missions may force the enemy toreposition combat forces away from the main battle area to protect lines of communications and othervulnerable areas. PSYOP, as part of 10, may support deception operations that will cause the enemy todeploy in a manner favorable to friendly forces. ARSOF possess the capabilities to organize and directlarge indigenous forces that cause the enemy to spread its forces thin (through UW) or to assist an HN increating a military shield (through FID), behind which OGAs can operate to remove the causes ofinsurgency. DISRUPTION 1-45. ARSOF can disrupt the enemy through attacks against strategic and operational targets and centersof gravity (COGs ), possibly precluding the enemy from conducting successful countermoves. ARSOF candisrupt the enemy throug h -

Special reconnaissance (SR) support of operational actions by conventional forces. DA strikes against critical operational targets. ;s 10 to disrupt enemy decision makers. PSYOP directed at civilian and military leaders , mjlitary forces , and the enemy population - as well as an enemy ' s political , economic , or military allies.


26/29

NOTICE NOTICE OF PREMEDITATEDFELONY RICO CRIMES

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 4

18 USC 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual co mmi ssion of a fe lony cogni zable by a courtof the United States, conceals and does not as soon as poss i ble make known the same tosome judge or other person in civil or military a uthority under the United States, shal l befined under this tit le or impri soned not more than thr ee years, or both.

AND ...

The Racketeer Infl uenced and Corrupt Or ganizations Act (commonl y referred to asRI CO Act or RICO ) is a United States federal law that provides for exte nded criminal

penalt ies and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminalorganizat ion . The RICO Act focuses spec ifically on racketeering , and it al lows for theleaders of a syndica te to be tried for the crimes whic h they ordered others to do orassisted them , closing a perceived loophol e that allowed someone who told a man to, forexample, murder, to be exemp t from the trial because they didn't actua lly do it.


27/29

1

JESUIT Extreme Oath of Induction

as recorded in the Journals of the 620 Congress , 3d Session of the U.S.

(House Calendar No. 397 . Report No. 1523)Congressional Record---House , 15 Feb. 1913 ,

pp3215-3216

I , now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist , the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints ,sacred host of Heave n, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Societyof Jesus , founded by St. Ignatius Loyally, in the pontification of Paul the III, andcontinued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin , the matrix of God , and the rod ofJesus Christ , dec lare and swear that His Hol iness , the Pope , is Christ's vice regent and isthe true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that

by the virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given His Holiness by my Sa vior , JesusChrist, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, andGovernments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of my power Iwill defend this doctrine and His Holiness's right and custom against all us urpers of theheretical or Protestant authority whatever , especially the Lutheran Church of Germany ,Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Church'sof England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on thecontinent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurpedand heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now denounce anddisown any allegiance as due to any heretica l king , prince or State , named Protestant orLiberal, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers. I do further declare thatthe doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland of the Calvinists, Huguenots , andothers of the name of Protestants or Masons to be damnable , and they themselves to bedamned who will not forsake the same. I do further declare that I will help, assist , andadvise all or any of His Holiness's agents , in a

wmd complaint to icc

Documents