working towards recovery shane martin, b.a., h.dip.ed., dip.psych., msc.psych.,reg.psychol.,ps.s.i....
TRANSCRIPT
WORKING TOWARDS RECOVERY
Shane Martin, B.A., H.Dip.Ed., Dip.Psych., MSc.Psych.,Reg.Psychol.,Ps.S.I.Rehabilitation Psychologist
WORKING TOWARDS RECOVERY
Ireland of 2006 The Reality of Mental Illness Mental Health Services since 1984 The crucial role of work within recovery
Challenges ahead
Mental Health in Ireland: SETTING THE CONTEXT
Ireland has undergone considerable social change in past 20 yrs.
Population up by half a million ( nearly 4m currently)
Age structure- fewer chlidren, more older people
Much wealthier. GDP (Gross Domesic Product) tripled in last 10 yrs
High unemployment of 1980’s evaporates ( 15% then, 4% now)
Mental Health in Ireland: SETTING THE CONTEXT
Today – serious inequalities exist
Relative income poverty still high by EU standards
Family structure has changed
More people living alone ( 22% of all households, 2002)
Mental Health in Ireland: SETTING THE CONTEXT
114,000 lone parent families
Main carers were women. Now more women in the ‘formal’ workforce ( 50% of 15-64 yr.s olds employed)
Less informal health care available
Ethnic and cultural structure has changed. ( 6% born outside of Ireland in 2002 – 10% currently)
QUALITATIVE CHANGES HARDER TO COUNT……..
Society is more rushed
People are working longer, commuting more
Modern lifestyle supported by new money (mostly credit) New pressures to sustain it
Less caring, shortage of volunteers
QUALITATIVE CHANGES HARDER TO COUNT……..
More materialistic
Youth have more freedom
Drug abuse
Crime
The Reality of Mental Illness
Lots of depression, anxiety, stress
Thousands suffer in silence
Thousands of lives shattered
Thousands of families shattered
The Reality of Mental Illness
Inadequate resources and supports
Treatment/supports have been inadequate for many thousands over the years
Mental Illness
WHO IS VULNERABLE?
WHY ARE PEOPLE VULNERABLE?
WHAT DO THEY NEED ?
Who are these people?
Looking back…………
Understanding of mental illness has been changing over the decades
1870’s asylyms for ‘everything’
2000’s community-based approach; evidence-based approach
A medical approach predominates
Hospitalisation
In recent decades….. De-institutionalisation Community-orientated model emerges Service-users ‘voice’ is louder and being heard
Medical approach – Societal approach
Recovery Model becoming a standard
‘PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE’ (1984)
Examined psychiatric services
Proposed a new model of mental health care
More comprehensive
Multi-disciplinary approach
‘PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE’ (1984)
Community care
Better co-ordination of services
Care within the home
Community-based services
Support for families
DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING ‘PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE’
General Hospital Psychiatric units – 8 in 1984, 22 in 2004
Psychiatric beds decreased by 67% in same period
Resident patients and admissions have also decreased
The Silent Revolution……………..
1984 2004
In-patients in psychiatric 12,484 3,556
Hospitals
Long-stay patients 7,086 1,242
(>5 yrs.)
New Long-stays 2,083 615
(>1 yr. < 5 yrs)
The Silent Revolution……………..
1984 2004
Admissions 28,830 22,279
First admissions 8,746 6,136
Outpatients 200,321 212,644
Day HospitalAttendees 0
162,233
Day Centre 0 413,771
The Silent Revolution……………..
1984 2004
Psychiatric beds 12,484 4,121
General HospitalPsych. Units 8
22
Day Hospital Places 0 1,022
Day Centre Places 0
2,486
Other significant developments
Mental Health Act (2001) Mental Health Commission Inspector of Mental Health Services
The reality on the ground Mental Illness is still here The menu of potential interventions/ supports is very limited
Stigma still alive and well Enduring mental illness – now within the community rather than the hospital
Enduring mental illness Unemployment within this group is approximately 85% (VandenBoom & Lustig, 1997)
Integration through Employment; are these people part of the ‘dream’?
Between 60-70% want to work Tiny fraction avail of S.E.
Enduring mental illness Work is extremely important in a person’s life, providing direct ecomonic and social benefits and contributing to self-esteem and quality of life. (Fabian & Coppola, 2001)
All important but elusive goal Unemployment often an inroad to mental illness
Unemployment blocks recovery
Enduring mental illness Bias, stigma, discrimination among persons with enduring mental illness in the area of employment
Vocational placements limited to areas as food service, gardening. laundry and janitorial service
THE FOUR F’S (Garske & Stewart, 1999) Food Flowers Folding Filth
But can these clients work? Traditionally mental health practice emphasied the stabilisation of symptoms
The protection of people with enduring mental illness from the expectations and stresses of normal adult life and community roles
But can these clients work? Tried intermentiate steps in highly protected.segregated settings
Sheltered Workshops Pre-Vocational Work Units Enclave jobs Businesses managed by Mental Health Services
But can these clients work? A Step-wise approach to prepare for competitive employment
Low expectations – long lasting
But can these clients work? During 1980’s Wehman and Moon (1988) conceptualised supported employment as a ‘place-and-train’ model
Reversing the practice of pre-vocational training prior to finding a job
Evidence-based supported emplyemnt is clearly established since late 1990s
Not widely implemented (Bond, Becker et al.,2001)
But can these clients work? “..substatial increases in rates of compettitive employment without adverse outcomes.” (Drake et al, 1994; Drake et al 1996; Bailey et al, 1998; Becker et al, 2001)
“..clients, families and providers preferred supported employment.” (Torrey et al. 1995)
But do they get jobs? One review (Bond et al, 1997) 58% obtained competitive employment within 12-18 months compared to 21% in the vocational training centres.
In Hartfort, Connecticut – over 24 month period supported employment clients had better employment outcomes than those in rehabilitation programmes (Mueser et al. 2004)
But do they get jobs? Research demonstates consistently that clients do not experience negative consequences such as increased symptoms, hospitatisation, suicide, drop-out etc
Most clients obtain part-time jobs (starting at 10 hours) Longer tenure when jobs are consistent with their preferences (Frarbaugh and Bond 1996)
But do they get jobs? One 10-year follow up study showed that clients in supported emplyment did better in terms of satisfaction and job tenure (Salyers et al, 2004)
What kind of S.E. is this? Competitive jobs based on a person’s preferences for type and amount of work
Rapid job seeking when person expresses interest ( self-intiated)
Minimal pre-vocational preparation and assessment
Follow-one supports
Pre-requisites Service-user at the heart of it – tailored to each unique individual
Adequate training of job coaches Partnership with relevant health professionals – a team approach
Supervision facility for job coaches
Pre-requisites Real jobs! Support continues from the job coach for as long as it’s needed
Flexibilty, sensitivity, Empathy, hope
Challenges? Ownership Negotiation Partnership Training New Systems