workplace investigations for june 15, 2010 presented by: michael j. soltis christina feeny and frank...

28
WORKPLACE WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS INVESTIGATIONS for for June 15, 2010 June 15, 2010 Presented by: Presented by: MICHAEL J. SOLTIS MICHAEL J. SOLTIS CHRISTINA FEENY CHRISTINA FEENY AND AND FRANK RUDEWICZ FRANK RUDEWICZ [email protected] | jacksonlewis.com [email protected] | jacksonlewis.com [email protected] | Thomsonreuters.com [email protected] | Thomsonreuters.com [email protected] |bdoconsulting.com [email protected] |bdoconsulting.com

Upload: russell-blake

Post on 27-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

WORKPLACEWORKPLACEINVESTIGATIONSINVESTIGATIONS

forfor

June 15, 2010June 15, 2010

Presented by:Presented by:

MICHAEL J. SOLTIS MICHAEL J. SOLTIS CHRISTINA FEENYCHRISTINA FEENY

ANDANDFRANK RUDEWICZFRANK RUDEWICZ

[email protected] | [email protected] | jacksonlewis.com [email protected] | [email protected] | Thomsonreuters.com

[email protected] |bdoconsulting.com [email protected] |bdoconsulting.com

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Why Investigate?

• Duty to Do So• Faraghar / Ellerth• Kolstad v. ADA• Employee Morale

2

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Plaintiff’s Mantra

• An Incompetent Investigator…• Did an Ineffective Investigation• Of Course, Reached the Wrong

Conclusion• What Else Would You Expect?

3

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Credible and Defensible

4

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

The Investigative Plan• Identify goals and objectives.

• Prioritize the steps to be taken.

• Set timetables.

• Covert versus overt.

• Choose the appropriate strategies and techniques– Digital Forensics, Field Interviews, Database and

Internet Research, Surveillance, Sting, Etc.

5

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Goals & Objectives

• Developing leads, facts, intelligence and general information:– about the issues in dispute– going to the credibility of witnesses,

potential witnesses and evidence– obtaining critical evidence

6

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Plan

• Elements of the violation– What are elements needed to establish

the violation?• Legal/criminal• Policy Violations• Procedural violations• Administrative violations

• Identify the targets of the investigation• Suspect known?• More than one suspect?

7

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Plan

• Assign the appropriate investigator– Any improper relationship?– Any known bias?– Should outside personnel be involved?

• Conduct interviews/collect facts– Ensure confidentiality of process– Maintain integrity of evidence and

investigation

8

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Plan

• Review information and verify– Compare information– Identify gaps

• Documentation– Restrict dissemination

9

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Plan Goals & Objectives

• Verify the occurrence– Rumors?– More to the story?– Any physical evidence?– Is this possible?

• Identify the alleged violation– What exactly occurred?– Confirm the allegation or is it another

offense?

10

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Investigative Approaches

• “Quiet” (covert).

• “Visible” (overt).

• Transition from quiet to visible inquiries.

• Public relations.

11

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Tools Available in an Investigation

• The Client

• The Law Firm

• Public Information– commercial databases– private and proprietary databases– public records– the Internet

12

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Tools Available in an Investigation

• People as sources

• Interviews of witnesses

• Surveillance

• Forensics

• Public relations

13

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Interviews of Witnesses• Who may be interviewed?

• Practical considerations

• Different approaches for interviews

• Tape recording interviews

• Eavesdropping and bugging

• Demands for payment and other requests

• Hiring former employees of an adversary

14

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Surveillance• During the initial phase of the

investigation

• Covert

• Dangers inherent in this technique

• Costs

• Client Expectations15

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Digital Forensics• Desktop and Laptop Computers

• Servers

• Mobile Telephones

• Blackberry Devices

• Other Digital and Digital Media Devices

• Key Stroke Monitors

• Developing Deleted Material

• Establishing Downloads and Theft

16

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Forensics• Forensic Accounting

• Fraud Auditing

• Stings

• Polygraphs

• Examinations of Trash

17

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Professional Licenses

• Retain only licensed investigators – performing investigations without a license is a crime in some states

18

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

• Competence

• Corroboration

• Common Sense

3 Cs of Investigative Management

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Myriad of PotentialPrivacy Issues

20

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Searches

• Desks, Files, Lockers• Cars• Mail• Strip Searches• Testing• Off-the-Job Conduct• Undercover Investigators

21

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Electronic Privacy Issues

• Quon v. City of Ontario (Awaiting S.Ct. Decision)

• E-Mail / Internet Issues• Eavesdropping• Recording Phone Calls• Electronic Monitoring• Taping

22

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Oh, the Places You Will Go…

Causes of ActionInvolving Investigations

23

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Causes of Action Involving Investigations

• Invasion of Privacy• Constructive Discharge• Defamation• False Imprisonment• Intentional Infliction of Emotional

Distress• Loss of Consortium• And More…

24

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Key Retaliation Cases Relating to Investigations

• Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White (S.Ct 2004)

• Crawford v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville and Davidson County, TN (S.Ct 2009)

• Fincher v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, (2d Cir. 2010)

25

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Recent Ethics Cases Relating to Investigations

• Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter (S.Ct. 2009)

• Costco Wholesale Corp. v. The Superior Court of LA County (S.Ct. CA 2009)

• Sandra T.E. v. South Berwyn School District 100 and Sidley Austin LLP (7th Cir. 2010)

26

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

Recent Ethics Cases Relating to Investigations

• In re Whirlpool Corp. (7th Cir. 2010)

• Speeny et al v. Rutgers, The State University et al (3rd Cir. 2010)

• Steingart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc. , (S.Ct. NJ 2010)

27

WORKPLACE

INVESTIGATIONS

June15, 2010

PRESENTED BY:

Michael J. Soltis

Christina FeenyFrank Rudewicz

ANY QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

28