world bank documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/624181468213895629/pdf/res... · der-sp road...
TRANSCRIPT
i
Document of
The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Report No: RES13568
RESTRUCTURING PAPER
ON A
PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING
OF
SAO PAULO SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT PROJECT
LOAN NUMBER 8272 – BR
APPROVED JUNE 14, 2013
TO THE
STATE OF SÃO PAULO
FEBRUARY XX, 2015
GTIDR
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their
official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
ii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
BRL Brazilian Real
CETESB Environmental Agency (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo)
CREMA Performance Based contracts for rehabilitation and road maintenance
DER-SP Road Agency, Sao Paulo State Government
DRM Disaster Risk Management
EA Environmental Assessment
EEZ Economic and Ecological Zoning
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GoB Government of Brazil
HDM Highway Development and Management Model
IA Implementation Agency
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
IG Geologic Institute (Instituto Geológico)
IPPF Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework
IRI International Roughness Index
IRR Internal Rate of Return
LDO Budget Guideline Law (Lei de Diretrizes Orçamentárias)
LOA Annual Budget Law (Lei Orçamentária Anual)
MDB Multilateral Development Bank
MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
NHSFO Non-Honoring of Sovereign Financial Obligations Product
NPV Net Present Value
ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework
PPP Private Public Partnership
SEFAZ State Secretariat of Finance, (Secretaria da Fazenda)
SLT Secretariat of Logistics and Transport
SMA Environment Secretariat
SoSP State of São Paulo
SPDR Planning and Regional Development Secretariat
USD United States Dollar
WB World Bank
Regional Vice President: Jorge Familiar
Country Director: Deborah L. Wetzel
Practice Senior Director: Pierre Guislain
Sector Manager: Aurelio Menendez
Task Team Leader: Eric R. Lancelot
iii
Brazil
Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project (P127723)
CONTENTS
A. SUMMARY 1
B. PROJECT STATUS 1
C. PROPOSED CHANGES 1
ANNEX 1: RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING 4
ANNEX 2: OPERATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 8
ANNEX 3: LIST OF ROADS 12
ANNEX 4: ECONOMIC APPRAISAL 13
iv
DATA SHEET
Brazil
Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project (P127723)
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN
LCSTR
Report No: RES13568
Basic Information
Project ID: P127723 Lending Instrument: Investment Project
Financing
Regional Vice President: Jorge Familiar Original EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)
Country Director: Deborah L. Wetzel Current EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)
Senior Practice Director: Pierre Guislain Original Approval Date: 14-Jun-2013
Sector Manager: Aurelio Menendez Current Closing Date: 31-Mar-2019
Team Leader: Eric R. Lancelot
Borrower: State of Sao Paulo
Responsible Agency: Secretariat of Transport and Logistics, Road Agency (DER-SP)
Restructuring Type
Form Type: Full Restructuring Paper Decision Authority: Country Director Approval
Restructuring Level: Level 2 Explanation of
Approval Authority:
Level II Restructuring
Financing ( as of 21-Jan-2014 )
Key Dates
Project Ln/Cr/TF Status Approval
Date Signing Date
Effectiveness
Date
Original
Closing Date
Revised
Closing Date
P127723 IBRD-82720 Effective 14-Jun-2013 24-Sep-2013 18-Dec-2013 31-Mar-2019 31-Mar-2019
Disbursements (in Millions)
Project Ln/Cr/TF Status Currency Original Revised Cancelle
d
Disburse
d
Undisbur
sed
%
Disburse
d
P127723 IBRD-82720 Effective USD 300.00 300.00 0.00 163.48 136.52 54.5
Policy Waivers
Does the project depart from the CAS in content or in other significant
respects? Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Does the project require any policy waiver(s)? Yes [ ] No [ X ]
v
A. Summary of Proposed Changes
The present restructuring aims at introducing a co-financing of US$300 million from the international
private bank Banco Santander, S.A. covered by MIGA under its Non-Honoring of Sovereign Financial
Obligations (NHSFO) guarantee, to scale-up the Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project (P127723).
Change in Implementing Agency Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Project's Development Objectives Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Results Framework Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change in Safeguard Policies Triggered Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change of EA category Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Other Changes to Safeguards Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Legal Covenants Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Loan Closing Date(s) Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Cancellations Proposed Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change to Financing Plan Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change in Disbursement Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Reallocation between Disbursement Categories Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Disbursement Estimates Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change to Components and Cost Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change in Institutional Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Financial Management Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Procurement Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Implementation Schedule Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Other Change(s) Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Economic and Financial Analysis Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Technical Analysis Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Social Analysis Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Environmental Analysis Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Risk Analysis Yes [ X ] No [ ]
B. Project Status
The Project, approved by the Board on June 14, 2013, was declared effective on December 18, 2013.
Project overall implementation is satisfactory at this early stage of execution with a disbursement rate of
54% and the first set of activities underway, including notably the execution of the first trench of road
rehabilitation works for a total commitment of about US$200 million and the second trench of works in
final stage of bidding.
Development Objectives/Results
Project Development Objectives
Original PDO
vi
Contribute to the improvement of the State’s transport and logistics efficiency and safety while enhancing
the Borrower’s capacity in environmental and disaster risk management.
Change in Project's Development Objectives
Change in Results Framework
Explanation:
Target values of one intermediate indicator will be changed due to increased scope of works with Joint co-
financing under the subcomponent 1.1 on Rehabilitation and upgrading of the State’s transport networks.
Financing
Change to Financing Plan
Explanation:
The Project will benefit from a co-financing from a private loan of US$300 million from the international
bank Banco Santander, S.A. covered by MIGA under its Non-Honoring of Sovereign Financial Obligations
(NHSFO) guarantee. Accordingly, the total amount of the Project costs will increase from US$429 million
to US$729 million.
Source(s) At Approval Current (from AUS) Proposed
BORR 129,000,000.00 129,000,000.00 129,000,000.00
Santander with MIGA
Guarantee 0.00 0.00 300,000,000.00
IBRD 300,000,000.00 300,000,000.00 300,000,000.00
Total 429,000,000.00 429,000,000.00 729,000,000.00
Disbursement Estimates
Change in Disbursement Estimates
Explanation:
Disbursement schedule will be revised to take into account the Government plans to use first the proceeds
from the international private banks to finance the Project’s works with an aim at optimizing the Project
financing costs.
Fiscal Year Current (USD) Proposed (USD)
2013 0.00 0.00
2014 30,000,000.00 40,000,000.00
2015 50,000,000.00 123,000,000.00
2016 70,000,000.00 20,000,000.00
2017 70,000,000.00 20,000,000.00
2018 70,000,000.00 70,000,000.00
2019 10,000,000.00 27,000,000.00
Total 300,000,000.00 300,000,000.00
Components
Change to Components and Cost
Explanation:
vii
The scope of the subcomponent 1.1 of the component 1 (Rehabilitation and Upgrading the State’s transport
networks) will be enlarged to encompass additional selected roads from the State Program. Specifically the
extension of state roads targeted by the Project under the sub-component 1.1 will increase from
approximately 380 km (including approximately 100 km of CREMA) to approximately 750 km (including
approximately 100 km of CREMA). In addition, the bridge reconstruction on the Tiete river will be
replaced by another similar bridge reconstruction upstream on the same Tiete river. While the total costs of
the Project’s sub-component will increase, no change in the costs of the IBRD loan will be triggered.
Current Component
Name
Proposed Component
Name
Current Cost
(US$M)
Proposed
Cost (US$M) Action
Component 1: Improving
transport and logistics
efficiency and safety 394.25 694.25 Revised
Component 2:
Strengthening sustainable
environmental and land
use planning and territorial
management capacity
18.00 18.00 No Change
Component 3: Increasing
State’s resilience to
natural disasters 16.00 16.00 No Change
Total: 428.25 728.25
Change(s) in Appraisal Summary
Appraisal Summary Change in Economic and Financial Analysis
Explanation:
Based on the calculation for the revised physical component, over 20 years, the net present value (NPV), at
a 12% discount rate, and the related internal rate of return (IRR) of the investments in this road
rehabilitation and maintenance subcomponent are respectively estimated as R$1,229 million and 38.7%.
Appraisal Summary Change in Technical Analysis
Explanation:
Under the component 1, the same rehabilitation and construction standards will be applied to the additional
road sections, including a full range of technical solutions such as local repairs, slurry seals, surface
treatment, concrete asphalt overlay, localized base reconstruction, bridge rehabilitation and drainage
systems upgrading, signalization improvements and resolution of dangerous cross-roads and accesses.
Construction of third lanes, duplications on existing roads will include all the above mentioned technical
solutions as well as earthworks, preparation of base courses, construction of bridges and culverts and other
necessary elements for road safety. The reconstruction of the bridges will involve the deconstruction of
actual infrastructures and their replacement by bridges with larger main spans. Designs of the new bridges
have been reviewed and agreed with the Bank.
Appraisal Summary Change in Social Analysis
Explanation:
The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Project was updated by the State of Sao Paulo to
take into account the enlarged scope of the works. It was published on the DER site on January 23, 2014.
There are no new safeguard policy triggered and no major adverse impact is expected from the additional
roads as well as replacement of the bridges.
viii
Appraisal Summary Change in Environmental Analysis
Explanation:
The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Project was updated by the State of Sao Paulo to
take into account the enlarged scope of the works. It was published on the DER site on January 23, 2014.
There are no new safeguard policy triggered and no major adverse impact is expected from the additional
roads as well as replacement of the bridges.
Appraisal Summary Change in Risk Analysis
Explanation:
Abandon of the Project by the private financier will be a new risk resulting from the participation of a Joint
Co-Financier. The Project risk remains Moderate.
1
A. SUMMARY 1. The present restructuring aims at introducing a co-financing of US$300 million
from the international private bank Banco Santander S.A. covered by MIGA under its
Non-Honoring of Sovereign Financial Obligations (NHSFO) guarantee, to scale-up the
Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project (P127723).
2. The Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project is a US$429 million operation
financed by a US$300 million Bank investment project financing (IPF) (LN8272-BR)
completed by US$129 million counterpart funds. It aims at contributing to the
improvement of the State’s transport and logistics efficiency and safety while enhancing
the State’s capacity in environmental and disaster risk management. It was approved by
the Board on June 14, 2013 and was declared effective on December 18, 2013.
3. So as to respond to the Client’s financial needs in a context of limited lending
space availability, a US$ 300 million co-financing from international private banks
covered by MIGA under its NHSFO instrument was envisaged early at Project
preparation to complement the financing of the road works under the Project’s first
component. This however could not materialize before the Project was presented to the
Board of the Bank due to unexpected delays in assessing and endorsing this innovative
approach by the Federal Government.
4. The Federal Government provided a principled endorsement of this co-financing
in August 2013 and the State initiated the bidding process to select the banks in
December 2013. As a result, the Spanish private bank Banco Santander S.A. was selected
by the State of Sao Paulo and, upon approval of the operation by the Federal Senate, the
loan agreement was signed with the State of Sao Paulo on November 11, 2014.
5. In parallel, the State of Sao Paulo processed a request for restructuring of Bank
Project to the Federal Government (Oficio 306/2014-GS-GCR of April 28, 2014), which
was approved by the Federal Government in December 2014 (Recomendacao 01/0255 of
December 10, 2014) and endorsed by the Federal Office of Attorney’s in January 2015
(Parecer PGFN/COF/No11/2015 of January 8, 2015).
B. PROJECT STATUS
6. Upon 18 months since Board approval and 12 months since effectiveness, Project
overall implementation is satisfactory with a disbursement rate of 54% and the first set of
activities underway, including notably the execution of the first trench of road
rehabilitation works for a total commitment of about US$200 million and the second
trench of works in final stage of bidding.
C. PROPOSED CHANGES
7. The Project Development Objective remains unchanged with the Joint Financing.
8. The proposed change consists in:
2
scaling-up the works under the Project’s component 1. The total extension of
State roads rehabilitated and upgraded with construction of third lanes,
duplications, slope protection and improvement of intersections selected for their
potential contribution to intermodality, will increase from approximately 280 km
to approximately 650 km. The eligible road sections will be selected in the set
listed in annex 3;
replacing the bridge reconstruction planned on the Tiete river by another bridge
reconstruction following the same standards (wider clearance) upstream on the
Tiete river to enhance waterway navigation on the Tiete inland waterway corridor
complex.
9. The road rehabilitation and upgrading works scale-up results from the additional
resources from the co-financing.
10. The reconstruction of the bridge of the road SP191 on the Tiete river by a wider
clearance bridge envisioned at preparation will not be implemented as initially planned
by the State Department of Roads, as alternative solutions are now being envisaged. Such
alternative solutions, yet not fully defined, could include the construction of a by-pass
canal. It will however not be included in the scope of the Project given the expected
horizon of realization, beyond 5 years. Conversely, another bridge reconstruction to
improve the inland waterway navigation standards of the Tiete river had been envisioned
at early stage of preparation to be added to the Project when the Joint Financing would be
available. The reconstruction of this bridge, on the SP 147 over the Tiete river upstream,
will follow similar improved standards and execution process. Preliminary design was
already reviewed and agreed upon by the Bank.
11. The Project appraisal update concludes that:
the Project remains economically viable with the proposed changes, with a net
present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) respectively estimated at
R$1,229 million and 38.7% (see details on the revised economic evaluation in
Annex 4);
based on an update of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the
Project encompassing the additional road sections and change of bridge, which
was published by the State of Sao Paulo (DER) on its site on January 23, 2014,
there are no new safeguard policy triggered and no major adverse impact is
expected from the additional roads and the replacement of the bridges.
The Project therefore remains a Category B and an updated version of the ISDS
was prepared and published on March 14, 2014.
12. The Bank will be responsible for all fiduciary aspects of the project activities
including civil work contracts on the additional road sections:
Environment and social safeguards: the Bank environmental and social safeguards
will be applied to all the works under the Project;
3
Procurement: the Bank procurement guidelines will be applied to all the works
that will be partially of fully financed by the Bank Loan. All works procured
following Bank procurement guidelines are expected to be prior reviewed;
Disbursement/Financial Management: the pari passu will be monitored quarterly
through reports prepared by the Client in accordance to the revised appendix 6 of
the updated Disbursement Letter. Project annual audit will encompass all
activities co-financed.
13. The proposed changes will trigger the following adaptations:
Costs: the costs of Sub-Component 1.1 will increase from US$385.75 million to
US$685.75 million of which US$269.5 million will remain financed by the IBRD
loan. Accordingly, the revised costs of Component 1 will be US$694.25 million
and the cost of the entire project will be US$729 million. The proposed revised
cost and financing table is provided below.
Table 1 - Project Cost and Financing
Project Components
(US$ millions)
IBRD Financing Counterpart Financing
Sub-
Total
Private Bank(s)
Financing Total
Cost (US$
Million)
% of
Sub-
Total
% of
Total
(US$
Million)
% of
Sub-
Total
% of
Total
(US$
Million)
% of
Total
Cost
Component 1* 275.450 70% 41% 118.800 30% 18% 394.250 300.000 42% 694.250
Component 2* 12.600 70% 70% 5.400 30% 30% 18.000 - 0% 18.000
Component 3 * 11.200 70% 70% 4.800 30% 30% 16.000 - 0% 16.000
Total Project Costs 299.250
129.000
428.250 300.000 728.250
Front-End Fees 0.750
0.750 0.750
Total Financing
Required 300.000 70% 41% 129.000 30% 18% 429.000 300.000 41% 729.000
Note: *the amounts include physical and price contingencies estimated at 10% of the baseline costs.
Result Framework: the intermediate result indicator on the Number of km or
rehabilitated and/or upgraded State paved roads from the Project Result
Framework will be revised to consider the Project widened scope of works with
an end-of-Project target value of 750 km, (see proposed revised result framework
in Annex 1).
Disbursement Schedule: while Disbursement Arrangement will remain, Bank loan
disbursement schedule will be revised to take into account the Government plans
to use first the proceeds from the international private banks to finance the
Project’s works with an aim at optimizing the Project financing costs.
Expected Disbursements (in USD Million)
Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Annual 40 123 20 20 70 27
Cumulative 40 163 183 203 273 300
4
Risk: the ORAF will be updated to take into account the Project new risk resulting
from to participation of a Joint Co-Financier (see revised ORAF in Annex 2). The
Project overall risk however remains Moderate.
5
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring
BRAZIL: Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project (P127723)
Project Development Objectives
Contribute to the improvement of the State’s transport and logistics efficiency and safety while enhancing the State’s capacity in
environmental and disaster risk management.
Project Development Objective Indicators
Indicator Name Core Unit of
Measure Baseline
Cumulative Target Values
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data Collection
YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 End
Target
Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total
classified roads X % 34 42 48
Baseline, YR 3 and
YR 5
Road condition
surveys. Good and fair
condition roads are
roads with IRI<3. Based on a total paved
State road extension of
20,800 km
Road Agency (DER) and
SLT
Increased intermodality measured by increased
proportion of exported
biofuel transported by
waterway in the State on the
Tiete river
% 0 10 30 Baseline, YR 3 and
YR 5
State waterway
transport data & export
statistics at ports Volume of exported
biofuel transported on
Tiete river / Total
Volume of biofuels
exported From the
main ports in Sao Paulo State
SLT
6
Improved transport
management measured by the increased proportion of
State road network managed
by performance
% 32 40 50 Baseline, YR 3 and
YR 5
Statistics of Road
Administration Contracts include
concession, PPP and
CREMA Based on a total paved
State road extension of
20,800 km
Road Agency (DER) and
SLT
Improved transport
management proactively coping with disaster through
the establishment of
contingency plans in a sample of DER’s local
representations for traffic
management (pilot UBA)
0
Risks
maps for the most
relevant
geographical areas
of 3
UBAs(IG)
Contingen
cy plans
adopted in
3 UBAs which
territories
have been mapped
(DER)
Yearly
Local representations
are the 3 UBAs (Mogi
das Cruzes, Sao
Vicente and
Caraguatatuba) covering the accesses
to the State's main
ports (Santos and Sao Sebastiao) and Sao
Paulo Metropolitan
Area
Road Agency (DER),
SMA/IG
Improved road safety measured by the reduction
in fatalities on the 100 most critical spots of the State
road network
# 124 62 62 62 Yearly
Surveys made by State
100 most critical spots
identified at appraisal as the 1km sections of
the road network with
highest number of accidents with death in
2012. The assessment will be by critical spot
compared to the
average death toll of the past 5 years and
will not take into
account exceptional situations.
Road Agency
(DER) and SLT
Intermediate Results Indicators
Indicator Name Core Unit of
Measure Baseline
Cumulative Target Values
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data Collection YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4
End Target
Component 1
Km of rehabilitated and/or x Km Original 0 279 377 Twice a Project monitoring DER
7
upgraded State paved roads Revised 0 350 750 year reports. Including
CREMA
# of bridges reconstructed Number 0 2 2
Twice a
year
Project monitoring
reports DER
Improved navigability of the
Tietê-Paraná waterway
system as measured by increased use of Tiete river
for freight
Million
Tonnage per year
1.5 3 6
Baseline,
YR 3 and YR 5
State waterway transport
statistics SLT
Component 2
Strengthened land use planning and territorial
management
No integrated land use
planning and
territorial management
policy
instrument
One integrated
land use
planning and
territorial
management policy
instrument
elaborated
Execution of three
Governm
ent actions
based on
the policy
instrume
nt
Twice a
year
Project Monitoring
Reports SPDR/SMA
Improved environmental
control measured by the
reduction of average delay for licensing transport
works
Days 360 345 330 Twice a
year
Project monitoring
reports
The average time refers to the time spent within the
State agency, from the day the preliminary
license (Licença Previa)
is required until the day the license is issued,
excluding any delays
caused by the requiring entrepreneur
(environmental
assessments, studies, action plans, etc).
SMA/CETES
B
8
Improved environmental
monitoring measured by the expansion of the of
underwater monitoring
capacity in the State territory
number 21 31 57 Twice a
year
Project monitoring
reports Based on the number of
the underground water
stations installed in Aquíferos Bauru and
Guarani Aquifers area.
SMA/CETESB
Component 3
Improved monitoring of
climate risk factors
measured by the number of
automatic monitoring
stations installed in the State
Number 0 20 40 Yearly Project Monitoring
Reports IG/DER
Increased number of
Municipalities in the Sao Paulo Metropolitan region
with a concluded Disaster
Risk mapping
Number of
Municipalities 12 25 39
Twice a
year
Project Monitoring Reports
IG
9
Annex 2: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF)
BRAZIL: Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project
1. Project Stakeholder Risks Rating: Moderate
Description: Project long term success requires buy-in from the
transport sector in achieving transport modal shift.
Risk Management: The State has a range of measures from incentives (facilitating accesses, customizing
particular taxes, etc.) to enforcing measures (increasing tolls, prohibiting particular itineraries etc.) that
might support the modal shift.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: not begun
Risk Management: Some production sectors (e.g. biofuel production) already confirmed interest in inland
waterway transport and indicated possible investment in infrastructures (ports, pipeline).
Resp: --- Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: not begun
Description: Successful land use planning and territorial
management are highly dependent on the private sector
understanding of the State policy.
Risk Management: The State has or will have of a range of measures from incentives (facilitating
accesses through improved infrastructures, customizing particular taxes, etc.) to enforcing measures
(prohibition of particular activities in particular regions through the EEZ etc.) that might support the
improved land use planning and territorial management.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: not begun
Risk Management: Activities will be conducted with consultations with the main stakeholders and the
State may undertake sensitization campaigns. Also, environmental and social management instruments
will include appropriate mitigation and compensation measures for managing such risks.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: not begun
Description: Inhabitants of areas identified as risky areas might
not adhere to risk reduction strategies including possible
resettlement. This issue refers to an activity under the DRM
subcomponent that intends to map vulnerable areas, and
possible recommendations for future resettlement, outside of
this Bank operation. Likewise, increased enforcement of the
environment legislation may trigger cases of discontent for
populations.
Risk Management: Sensitization campaigns. Environmental and social management instruments will
include appropriate mitigation and compensation measures for managing such risks.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date : Status: not begun
Risk Management: Bank safeguard policies to be followed.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date : Status: In Progress
2. Implementing Agency Risks (including fiduciary)
10
3.1. Capacity Rating: Low
Description: One of the five Participating Entities is unfamiliar
with Bank processes
Risk Management : The Project has been designed to concentrate fiduciary responsibilities in the
implementing agency, which created a dedicated unit staffed with specialists with experience with Bank
Projects and further strengthened by additional specialists, following a model experimented in various
other occasion, including in an ongoing Project with the same Implementing Agency. The Implementing
Agency has a good track record in procurement, financial management, and safeguard policy management
for externally-financed activities, including the WB. Each participating entity will handle the technical
responsibilities of procurement activities for its unit. Each Beneficiary entity will be strengthened by
procurement-specialized units to further improve quality and efficiency of the processes. The IA will
ensure final quality control.
Resp: Client Stage: Preparation Due Date :n/a Status: completed
Risk Management: Continuous training on IBRD procedures and regular missions by team’s specialists.
Resp: Client
Stage: Preparation &
Implementation Due Date : Status: ongoing
Description: The Implementing Agency will manage large scale
investments of about US$5 billion involving various
multilateral and national agencies (IADB, CAF (Development
Bank of Latin America), BNDES (Brazilian Development
Bank), Banco do Brasil). In addition, it will manage the
interlocution of a number of beneficiaries for the Project,
resulting in potential bottleneck management capacity.
Risk Management: The Implementing Agency is experienced with large investments programs and will
benefit from the support of a managing company (Gerenciadora). More precisely on the work, the IA will
gain also support from supervision companies as well as independent environmental supervision
companies.
Resp: Client Stage: Preparation Due Date : Status: In Progress
3.2. Governance Rating: Moderate
Description: Project complexity, notably on activities across
sectors, requires a strong champion. Implementation might be
affected by lack of decision making.
Risk Management: The Government is committed to advance the agenda of Land Use Planning and
Territorial Management. The cooperation agreement shall include, besides all other requirements as stated
in the Loan Agreement, a specific commitment from the participating entities SPDR, SLT and SMA to
support in an integrated fashion the execution of the subcomponent 2.1, Land Use Planning and
Territorial Management.
Resp: Client /Bank
Stage: Preparation
Due Date : by appraisal
Status: ongoing
Risk Management: Control processes in the country (judicial powers, legislation) and Bank projects
(supervision, procurement processes) are well functioning, and will continue to be applied and improved
where possible.
Resp: Client/Bank Stage: Implementation Due Date :n/a Status: In Progress
Risk Management: Systematic prior review of bidding processes.
Resp: Bank Stage: Implementation Due Date : n/a Status: In Progress
11
4. Project Risks
4.1. Design Rating: Moderate
Description: The Project is comprised of three main
components: transport, environment, and DRM, which will be
implemented by five different agencies, potentially affecting
smooth delivery of project outcomes. It may also strain Bank’s
resources for supervision.
Risk Management: appropriate packaging of works contracts should increase efficiency on the physical
component while fostering collaboration between beneficiary entities through steering committee and
inter-sector management teams should help the implementation of the components 1.2, 2 and 3.
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: ongoing
Description: Performance-based (CREMA) contract is a new
contract modality for Sao Paulo which needs to be well
prepared and executed.
Risk Management: CREMA specifications have been adapted to SP and CREMA engineering designs
have been lengthy ready by negotiations.
Resp: Client Stage: Preparation Due Date: n/a Status: ongoing
Risk Management: experience shows that the CREMA approach generally brings benefits (Sustainability
of improved roads, quality of road maintenance, low costs) provided it is well implemented. The team
will closely follow-up contract preparation and execution.
Resp: Bank Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: In Progress
4.2. Social & Environmental Rating: Moderate
Description: Some of the civil works under component 1 will
require limited land acquisition and/or resettlement. Some
municipal disaster management plans under component 3 may
also assist with resettlement planning for people living in
disaster prone areas. Strengthening enforcement under
components 2 may result in restrictions on access to natural
resources in legally protected areas.
Risk Management: The SoSP has a sound safeguard framework and the implementing agency has good
experience in handling safeguard requirements of multilateral development banks. Site specific
Resettlement Plans have been prepared to mitigate these particular adverse impacts.
Every works contract is to be followed by the State’s team of environmental management and specialized
environmental supervision companies monitor the State’s management the safeguards.
Resp: Client/Bank Stage: Preparation Due Date: n/a Status: completed
The proposed pilot measures to improve environmental
enforcement and disaster risk management through components
2 and 3, could also – if managed inappropriately – trigger
discontent among the affected populations.
Risk Management: Appropriate safeguards instruments have been prepared and close monitoring of
safeguards during implementation and supervision mission will be undertaken, including field visits by
Bank’s environmental & social specialists.
A Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) that sets out the guidelines, procedures and criteria to avoid,
minimize, mitigate and/or compensate any additional resettlement impacts that could potentially result
from any eventual design modifications. Although component 3 will not finance the resettlement of any
persons living in natural disaster prone areas, it could potentially support preparation of resettlement plans
for populations living in these high risk areas. In such cases, the RPF will also guide the design of the
resettlement planning activities included in disaster risk management frameworks that will be prepared.
The project will apply operational policy OP 4.10 Indigenous Peoples to ensure that specific actions will
be designed to provide indigenous peoples with appropriate opportunities to participate and voice their
concerns in the regional planning processes. This outcome will be achieved through application of the
Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) prepared by the State.
12
The Process Framework (PF) will ensure that consultations with land users serve to identify any relevant
restrictions and support the design of appropriate mitigation measures to enable preservation of their
socioeconomic conditions, particularly of the most vulnerable populations.
Resp: ---- Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: not begun
4.3. Program & Donor Rating: Low
Description: Part of the success of the Project relies on
counterpart financing. Risk Management: Strong commitment of the SoSP to the Project
Resp: Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: In Progress
Description: Given the large portion of the project budget relies
on commercial financing, an abandon of the Project by private
bank(s) may affect the capacity of the Project to reach the
revised targets.
Risk Management: The bidding process for the selection of international private banks triggered strong
interest from various competitors, illustrating the appetite of international private banks for such an
operation in the State of Sao Paulo. Voluntary abandon of the Project is thus considered unlikely. Should
this however happen and no substitutive financing is found, the private bank financing is expected to
contribute only to the works under the transport component, thus consequences on the Project capacity to
reach its objective limited.
Resp: Bank and Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: In Progress
4.4. Delivery Monitoring & Sustainability Rating: Low
Description: Delays in payment of counterpart funds to
contractors could derail project implementation
Risk Management: A flexible approach towards rate of disbursement has been taken under the work
component and the Project will finance 100% of part of the activities under the institutional strengthening
components while the Government will finance 100% of the remaining activities. All activities under the
Project are priority for the SoSP.
Resp: Bank and Client Stage: Implementation Due Date: n/a Status: In Progress
5. Overall Risk MODERATE
13
Annex 3: List of roads
BRAZIL: Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project
# Road No. Section Extension (km) Remarks
Original Sections
1-1 SP 304 Jaú - Bariri - Itaju
Km 302,38 -Km 352,32 49.94 Rehabilitation, additional lane
1-2 SP 304 Ibitinga - Borborema
Km 352,32 -Km 406,70 54.38
Rehabilitation, additional lane, local
improvement
1-3 SP 379 Uchoa - Ibirá - Urupês - Irapuã - Sales
Km 0,000 - Km 51,29 51.29 Rehabilitation, additional lane
1-4 SP 425 Miguelópolis - Guaíra
Km 23,90 - Km 57,60 33.70
Rehabilitation, additional lane, local
improvement
1-5 SP 425 Guaíra - Barretos
Km 57,60 - Km 92,0 34.40 Rehabilitation, additional lane
1-6 SP 425 Olímpia
Km 102,00 - Km 157,55 55.5 Rehabilitation, additional lane
2-1 SP 463 Araçatuba - Santo Antônio do
Araranguá - Auriflama (SP 310)
Km 60,900 - Km 121,900
61
Rehabilitation (CREMA) 2-2 SPA 096/463 Auriflama - General Salgado 9.45
2-3 SP 463 Jales - Pontalina - Auriflama (SP 310)
Km 121,000 - Km 149,000 27.1
Sub-Total 376.76
Additional Sections: approximately 375 km of road sections, selected in the following road sections assessed under the
updated ESIA
2-4 SP 419 Penápolis - Alto Alegre - Luiziânia
Km 0,000 - Km 35,400 35.40 Rehabilitation, additional lane
3-1 SP 129 Km 0,000 a Km 29,85 29.85 Rehabilitation, duplication
3-2 SP 147 Km 149,42 a Km 210,00 60.58 Rehabilitation, additional lane
3-3 SP 147 Km 210,00 a Km 235,80 25.80 Rehabilitation, additional lane
3-4 SPA570/254 Km 0,000 a 12,80 12.80 Rehabilitation
3-5 SPA 592/294 Km 0,000 a 18,90 18.90 Rehabilitation
3-6 SP 304 Km 198,14 a Km 258,94 60.29 Rehabilitation, additional lanes
3-7 SPA 395/310 Km 0,000 a 13,20 13.20 Conservation
3-8 SPA 423/310 Km 0,000 a 18,8 18.80 Rehabilitation
3-9 SPA 473/310 Km 0,000 a 19,05 19.05 Rehabilitation
3-10 SPA 431/425 Km 0,000 a 15,60 15.60 Rehabilitation
3-11 SP 461 70.56 Rehabilitation, additional lane
3-12 SPA 126/563 Km 0,000 a 10,78 10.78 Rehabilitation
3-13 SP 294 Km 658,38 a Km 686,7 28.30 Rehabilitation, additional lane
3-14 SP 334 Km 421, a Km 454,80 33.70 Rehabilitation, additional lane
Sub-Total 453.61
Grand Total
830.37 In total, about 750 km of roads a
priori selected from the above road
sections will be financed by the
Project.
14
Annex 4: Economic Appraisal
BRAZIL: Sao Paulo Sustainable Transport Project
1. The present analysis updates the PAD economic evaluation given the Project expanded
scope as a result of the Joint-Financing. The same methodology was used as at Project appraisal,
focusing on the Project’s physical subcomponents, (i) State roads rehabilitation and upgrading,
and (ii) bridge reconstruction for inland waterway transport on the Tiete river. For each
subcomponent, similar methodologies as at appraisal were applied.
2. This assessment does not consider benefits resulting from road safety improvements as
the selected improvements expected under the Project were not yet defined at the time of the
Restructuring. Initial findings from the iRAP study demonstrate high NPV and IRR for the
potential investments. While this is not expected to substantially change the Project NPV and
IRR given the relatively limited size of the investment compared to the overall investments in
roads, Project NPV and IRR is expected to be slightly hirer than the values below.
Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance Works (including CREMA)
3. For the State road rehabilitation and upgrading and CREMA works, the evaluation
followed a traditional approach assessing benefits and costs of the investments using the
Highway Development and Management Model (HDM-4). The analysis was conducted on all 24
state-road sections identified a candidate to be financed under the Project for a total of 830 km
(see Annex 3).
4. Based on the calculation for the selected sections of 830 km, over 20 years, the net
present value (NPV), at a 12% discount rate, and the related internal rate of return (IRR) of the
investments in this subcomponent are respectively estimated as R$1,318 million and 41.4%.
5. Given that the Project will target about 750 km of selected roads in the candidate roads
(see Annex 3), the NPV is estimated at R$1,191.
Bridge Reconstruction
6. Cost/benefits analysis, resulting from improved conditions of navigability in the Tiete
inland waterway in the State of Sao Paulo assessed reduction in transport costs due to the modal
shift of freight from road to inland waterway transport.
7. Considering that the estimated capital investment is R$107.3 million for reconstructing
the two bridges, and the annual costs on maintenance and rehabilitation are assumed at 1% of the
capital costs, NPV at a 12% discount rate is R$37.4 million and the related IRR of the
investments in this subcomponent is 16.5% over 20 years.
Conclusion
8. Overall, the Project IRR and NPV of the both road rehabilitation/maintenance and bridge
reconstruction works are estimated respectively at 38.7% and R$1,229 million based on the
above analysis.