world bank documentdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/... · republic of india november 10, 2015...
TRANSCRIPT
Document of
The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Report No: RES20646
RESTRUCTURING PAPER
ON A
PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING
OF
SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT
IBRD 78180
TF 95549
DECEMBER 10, 2009
TO
REPUBLIC OF INDIA
NOVEMBER 10, 2015
TRANSPORT AND ICT GLOBAL PRACTICE
SOUTH ASIA REGION
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their
official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
2
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AFCS Automatic Fare Collection Systems
BAU Business as Usual
BRTS Bus Rapid Transit System
DEA Department of Economic Affairs
CPS Country Partnership Strategy
EA Environmental Assessment
FM Financial Management
GEF Global Environment Facility
GEO Global Environment Objectives
GHG Green House Gas
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction &
Development
ITS Intelligent Transport Systems
LUTP Leaders in Urban Transport Planning
M&E Monitoring & Evaluation
MCC Mysore City Corporation
MoUD Ministry of Urban Development
MTR Mid Term Review
NPTH National Public Transport Helpline
NMT Non- Motorized Transportation
PBS Public Bike Sharing
PCMC Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation
PDO Project Development Objective
PIA Project Implementing Agency
PIU Project Implementing Unit
PMU Project Management Unit
TA Technical Assistance
TSP Traffic Signal Priority
TMICC Traffic Management & Information Control
Centre
TOD Transit Oriented Development
UMTA Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority
UTF Urban Transport Fund
3
Regional Vice President: Annette Dixon
Country Director: Onno Ruhl
Senior Global Practice Director: Pierre Guislain
Practice Manager/Manager: Karla Gonzalez Carvajal
Task Team Leader: Nupur Gupta
4
India
Sustainable Urban Transport Project (P110371/100589)
CONTENTS
A. SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------5
B. PROJECT STATUS --------------------------------------------------------------------6
C. PROPOSED CHANGES-------------------------------------------------------------------6
ANNEX 1A: RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING -----------------------------13
ANNEX 1B: RESULTS FRAMEWORK INDICATOR DESCRIPTION--------------------16
ANNEX 1C: RESULTS FRAMEWORK CHANGE JUSTIFICATION----------------------18
5
DATA SHEET
India
Sustainable Urban Transport Project & GEF Sustainable Urban Transport Project
(P110371 and P100589)
SOUTH ASIA
Transport & ICT
Report No: RES20646
Basic Information
Project ID: P110371, P100589 Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan
Regional Vice President: Annette Dixon Original EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)
Country Director: Onno Ruhl Current EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)
Senior Global Practice
Director: Pierre Guislain Original Approval Date: 10-Dec-2009
Practice
Manager/Manager: Karla Gonzalez Carvajal Current Closing Date: 30-Nov-2015
Team Leader(s): Nupur Gupta GEF Focal Area: Climate change
Borrower: Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India
Responsible
Agency:
Atal Indore City Transport Services Ltd, Hubli Dharwad BRTS Company, Karnataka
State Road Transport Corporation, Ministry of Urban Development, Naya Raipur
Development Authority, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Mysore City
Corporation
Restructuring Type
Form Type: Full Restructuring Paper Decision Authority: Regional Vice President
Approval
Restructuring
Level:
Level 2 Explanation of
Approval Authority:
This is a level 2 restructuring
involving a Project extension
of two years and four months,
which in combination with the
earlier extension of one year is
equivalent to an overall 3 year
and four month extension from
the Original Closing Date. It
also includes some reallocation
of funds and changes to the
results framework involving
modifications to indicators and
targets.
6
Financing ( as of 02-Sep-2015 )
Key Dates
Project Ln/Cr/TF Status Approval
Date Signing Date
Effectiveness
Date
Original
Closing Date
Revised
Closing Date
P110371 IBRD-78180 Effective 10-Dec-2009 05-Feb-2010 03-May-2010 30-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2015
P100589 TF-95549 Effective 05-Feb-2010 05-Feb-2010 03-May-2010 30-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2015
Disbursements (in Millions)
Project Ln/Cr/TF Status Currency Original Revised Cancelle
d
Disburse
d
Undisbur
sed
%
Disburse
d
P110371 IBRD-78180 Effective USD 105.23 105.23 0.00 41.58 63.65 40
P100589 TF-95549 Effective USD 18.45 18.45 0.00 8.87 9.58 48
Policy Waivers
Does the project depart from the CAS/CPF in content or in other significant
respects? Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Does the project require any policy waiver(s)? Yes [ ] No [ X ]
A. Summary of Proposed Changes
The changes proposed as a part of this restructuring include (i) an extension of 28 months to the Project
Closing Date from November 30, 2015 to March 31, 2018, for both the loan and grant agreement requested
vide DEA’s letter dated November 10, 2015, along with subsequent revision to the disbursement
projections (ii) reallocation of loan proceeds involving allocation of the unallocated funds under Pimpri
Chinchwad city demonstration project (Maharashtra) to the existing category for Road Works &
Structures, and combining of two separate disbursement categories for works and goods for Naya Raipur
city demonstration project (Chhattisgarh), and (iii) changes in the results framework indicators and targets.
Change in Implementing Agency Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Project's Development Objectives Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Project's Global Environmental Objectives Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Results Framework Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change in Safeguard Policies Triggered Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change of EA category Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Other Changes to Safeguards Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Legal Covenants Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Loan Closing Date(s) Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Cancellations Proposed Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change to Financing Plan Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Disbursement Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Reallocation between Disbursement Categories Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Change in Disbursement Estimates Yes [ X ] No [ ]
7
Change to Components and Cost Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Institutional Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Financial Management Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Procurement Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Change in Implementation Schedule Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Other Change(s) Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Economic and Financial Analysis Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Technical Analysis Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Social Analysis Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Environmental Analysis Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Appraisal Summary Change in Risk Assessment Yes [ ] No [ X ]
B. Project Status
Project implementation progress is currently rated Moderately Unsatisfactory, as the Project will require
additional time for completion of planned activities. Owing to delays in completing resettlement in Pimpri-
Chinchwad the safeguards rating is currently rated Moderately Unsatisfactory. The likelihood of achieving
the PDO is also rated Moderately Unsatisfactory as the project outcomes would only partially be achieved
by its current closing date.
The project disbursements are at 40 percent and 48 percent respectively for IBRD and GEF in the sixth
year of implementation. However, 80 percent of the IBRD and GEF funds are committed with two major
procurements remaining to be completed for both sources of financing. All procurements are expected to
be completed by March 2016. Over 90 percent of land acquisition has been completed and the balance is
expected to be completed by March 2016.
There are two components under the project, (i) Capacity Development Assistance for national, state and
city level agencies, and (ii) City Demonstration Projects involving support to demonstration cities with
high impact urban transport projects with replication potential. The demonstration cities (projects) include
Pimpri-Chinchwad (bus rapid transit system (BRT)), Naya Raipur (BRT Lite), Hubli-Dharwad (BRT),
Mysore (Intelligent Transport System (ITS), Public Bike Sharing (PBS)) and Indore (ITS).
The component on Capacity Development Assistance is progressing with technical support to Indian cities
being provided in important areas of urban transport planning and implementation and government
officials working in the field of urban transport benefiting from training and capacity building
interventions.
Under the second component on City Demonstration Projects:
An Intelligent Transport System (ITS) has been successfully implemented on the city wide bus
service in Mysore;
The first of four bus rapid transit (BRT) corridors has been launched in Pimpri-Chinchwad, and
the launch of the second corridor which is Bank supported is imminent. However, the fourth
corridor, which is also Bank supported, has been delayed on account of contractor performance
and pending land acquisition and resettlement activities.
An interim bus service between old and New Raipur city has been initiated in advance of the BRT
Lite ensuring public transport connectivity between the two cities.
For Hubli-Dharwad which became a part of the Project in 2013, procurements and land
acquisition have been substantially completed, with the remaining two major procurements
8
proposed to be completed by March 2016.
ITS procurement for the BRT has encountered problems in Indore and is being rebid. It is
proposed to be awarded by March 2016;
The PBS project in Mysore, included in 2015, has completed bid evaluation and expected to be
awarded within this calendar year.
As of October 29, 2015, all previous audit reports were received by the Bank and found acceptable. The
audit report for FY 2014-15 will be due for submission by December 31 2015.
C. Proposed Changes
Development Objectives/Results
Project Development Objectives
Original PDO
The project’s development objective (PDO) is to promote environmentally sustainable urban transport in
India and to improve the usage of environment-friendly transport modes through demonstration projects in
selected cities.
Change in Project's Development Objectives none
Global Environmental Objectives
Original GEO
The Project’s Development Objective (PDO) is to promote environmentally sustainable urban transport in
India and to improve the usage of environment-friendly transport modes through demonstration projects in
selected cities.
Change in Project's Global Environmental Objectives
Change in Results Framework
Explanation:
Modifications to the results framework are being made to better align the results framework to the Project
outcomes and outputs as also identified at the time of the MTR, and to remove duplication. The details of
the changes proposed along with the justifications are enclosed in the Annex.
Financing
Change in Loan Closing Date(s)
Explanation:
The Project has disbursed roughly 40 percent and 48 percent of IBRD and GEF funds thus far and will not
be complete by its current closing date of November 30, 2015. An extension to the closing date is therefore
sought until March 31, 2018, so project activities can be satisfactorily completed and the project
development objective (PDO) achieved. A time bound action plan to complete the project by the new
closing date has been developed by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) and the demonstration
cities. The same has been reviewed by the Bank and found credible.
Rationale for the 28-month extension:
Component IB on Capacity Development Assistance is progressing with over 200 officials now trained
under the ‘Leaders in Urban Transport Planning’ training program, and several Indian cities directly
benefiting from the technical assistance ongoing in the areas of unified metropolitan transit authorities
(UMTA), urban transport fund (UTF), transit oriented development (ToD), and non-motorized transport
9
(NMT) master planning. These initiatives are all contributing to capacity development in urban transport
planning and implementation. The Guidelines being developed in these areas of urban transport reforms,
planning and implementation are in their final stages and these are likely to be substantially completed by
March 2016. Two activities are expected to require an additional year for completion. The extension offers
opportunity for training more officials, taking up dissemination activities to ensure proper awareness and
understanding of the Guidelines being developed, and for beneficiary cities to implement the activities
they received technical support on.
Pimpri-Chinchwad: Pimpri-Chinchwad is implementing four BRT corridors, two of which are Bank
supported. The first BRT corridor (Corridor 2) has been recently launched. Out of the two Bank funded
corridors, the first (Corridor 3) is expected to be launched in the coming weeks. However, the launch of
the second corridor (Corridor 4) may slip to end 2016 early 2017, as contractor issues have delayed the
construction of the Empire Estate grade separator. Progress of this contract is at about 50% in more than
four years since April 2011. Optimistically, one may expect the Contract to be completed over the next
year. Further, there have been long pending resettlement activities on the corridor holding up land
acquisition and in turn road construction works. About 60 percent of families eligible for Economically
Weaker Section (EWS) housing have received possession and the remaining are expected to receive the
houses shortly. However, the balance issues with regard to ineligible households and small business units
need to be dealt with to make the full site available for construction. The allotment of houses to 65%
eligible people currently in Transit housing is delayed since the repair works are taking longer than
expected. Finally, the Tripartite Agreement between PCMC, Maharashtra Industrial Development
Corporation and 22 affected industrial units for handing over of small stretch is also pending and needs to
be expedited. It is expected that these land acquisition and resettlement issues would be substantially
resolved by March 2016. Taking into account the above factors, Corridor 4 could be ready for BRT launch
by end 2016 to early 2017.
Naya Raipur: All procurements have been completed and the progress on the civil works contracts is at 65
percent and 35 percent of the BRT infrastructure works and NMT infrastructure works packages
respectively. The BRT infrastructure works are planned to be completed by end of 2015, with the ITS
installations and bus operator procurements being completed thereafter. The BRT Lite launch is likely by
late 2016. Meanwhile, an interim bus service is running between Raipur and Naya Raipur. The NMT
infrastructure works are expected to be complete by June 2016.
Hubli Dharwad: Hubli Dharwad was included as one of the cities under SUTP in August 2013 following
the cancellation of Pune from the Project. 9 of the 11 packages have been awarded in Hubli Dharwad, with
the balance two procurements on ITS and the Dharwad Terminal planned for completion by March 31,
2016. The ITS package received unresponsive bids and therefore needs to be rebid. Implementation of the
last two packages will be completed by mid-2017. There have been delays in land acquisition and
finalization of designs owing to representations from affected persons for reconsideration of project design
and development of alternatives. Over 90 percent of the land acquisition has now been completed and the
balance may require another few months. The procurement and construction of the Road-over-Bridge
(RoB) along the BRT corridor which is state government financed is on the critical path. This will require
18 months for construction and likely to be ready by September 2017. A realistic assessment of the project
completion date indicates the launch of BRT by October 2017. A Closing date of March 2018 should
provide sufficient time for launch of the BRT and its performance to be monitored over a few months.
Indore: The procurement of ITS for Indore BRT has to be relaunched as the bids received in the previous
procurement were found non-responsive. Indore expects to complete the bidding by early 2016, and given
that the vendor is likely to take at least one year to install the ITS, the system should become operational
by mid 2017 leaving sufficient time for performance to become evident.
Mysore PBS: The Mysore PBS project which was included in SUTP only recently (July 2015), has
10
recently completed evaluations and expected to complete contract award shortly with the operator likely to
be on board by December 2015. Once the operator is on board, the project will require at least one year for
implementation providing sufficient time for monitoring the performance of this first of its kind project in
India.
As a result of this varying implementation schedule of projects in all the cities, the project development
objective (PDO) is unlikely to be fully achieved within the current closing timeframe. In order to
satisfactorily complete agreed project activities and achieve the PDO the Project will require an extension
until March 31, 2018, bringing the total time extension from the original closing date of November 30,
2014 to 3 years and four months.
The Bank team will continue to monitor closely the project to maintain pressure on stakeholders and make
sure the project completes by the proposed revised closing date of March 31, 2018.
Ln/Cr/T
F Status
Original Closing
Date
Current Closing
Date
Proposed Closing
Date
Previous Closing
Date(s)
IBRD-
78180 Effective 30-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2015 31-March-2018 30-Nov-2014
TF-
95549 Effective 30-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2015 31-March-2018 30-Nov-2014
Reallocations
Explanation:
The unallocated amount of US$5.6 mn with Pimpri-Chinchwad (Maharashtra) is proposed to be
reallocated to the existing category for Road Works & Structures where it is expected to be substantially
utilised; In addition, the two separate disbursement categories for works and goods for Naya Raipur
(Chhattisgarh) are proposed to be combined into a single category for greater ease in utilization of funds.
Ln/Cr/TF Currency Current Category of
Expenditure Allocation
Disbursement % (Type
Total)
Current Proposed Current Proposed
IBRD-78180 USD
Chhattisgarh Works
under Part 2A of the
Project
12,270,000.
00 4,167,545.3
2 100.00 100.00
Chhattisgarh Goods
under Part 2A of the
Project
1,667,000.0
0 0.00 100.00 100.00
Maharashtra Work under
Sub Comp1 Part 2B of
the Project
0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00
Maharashtra Works
under Sub Comp 2 Part
2B of the Project
0.00 0.00 48.00 48.00
Maharashtra Goods under
Sub Comp 1 & 2 Part 2B
of the Project
0.00 0.00 22.00 22.00
Maharashtra Works
under Sub Comp 3(a) of
Part 2B of the Project
29,877,000.
00 35,576,925.
00 72.00 72.00
11
Maharashtra Works Sub
Comp 3(b) Part 2B of the
Project
0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00
Maharashtra Goods under
Sub Comp 3 Part 2B of
the Project
0.00 0.00 78.00 78.00
UNALLOCATED 5,699,925.0
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Karnataka Goods and
Works Part 2C of the
Project
55,453,000.
00
55,453,000.
00 100.00 100.00
FRONT END FEE 263,075.00 263,075.00 100.00 100.00
Chhattisgarh Works and
Goods under Part 2A of
the Project
0.00 9,769,454.6
8 100.00 100.00
Total: 105,230,000
.00
105,230,000
.00
TF-95549 USD
Consultants’ Services,
and Training for Part 1 of
the Project
6,150,000.0
0
6,150,000.0
0 100.00 100.00
Consultants’ Services and
Training for Part 2 of the
Project: Chhatisgarth &
Maharashtra
680,815.00 680,815.00 50.00 50.00
Consultants’ Services and
training for Part 2 of the
Project: Madhya Pradesh
1,090,000.0
0
1,090,000.0
0 87.00 87.00
Consultants’ Services and
Training for Part 2 of the
Project: Karnataka -
Mysore
860,000.00 860,000.00 73.00 73.00
UNALLOCATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consultants’ Services and
Training for Part 2 of the
Project: Maharashtra
1,814,552.0
0
1,814,552.0
0 89.00 89.00
Consultants’ Services and
Training for Part 2 of the
Project: Chhatisgarh
1,304,633.0
0
1,304,633.0
0 50.00 50.00
Goods (ITS-related)
Madhya Pradsh 820,000.00 820,000.00 64.00 64.00
Goods (ITS-related)
Karnataka
1,630,000.0
0
1,630,000.0
0 100.00 100.00
Consultants’ Services and 2,500,000.0 2,500,000.0 100.00 100.00
12
Training under Part 2 of
the Project for
Karnataka-Hubli-
Dharwad
0 0
Consultants’ Services,
Goods and Training for
Karnataka –Mysore
public bike sharing under
Part 2 of the Project ,
1,600,000.0
0
1,600,000.0
0 100.00 100.00
Total: 18,450,000.
00
18,450,000.
00
Disbursement Estimates
Change in Disbursement Estimates (IBRD)
Explanation:
With Project extension, the disbursement schedule will also be modified.
Fiscal Year Current (USD) Proposed (USD)
2010 7,000,000.00 7,263,075.00
2011 3,043,072.16 3,043,072.16
2012 5,842,137.00 5,842,137.00
2013 5,499,820.00 5,950,508.83
2014 15,999,970.84 8,954,997.10
2015 42,000,000.00 6,949,509.67
2016 25,845,000.00 12,000,000.00
2017 0.00 30,000,000.00
2018 0.00 25,226,700.24
Total 105,230,000.00 105,230,000.00
Change in Disbursement Estimates (GEF)
Explanation:
With Project extension, the disbursement schedule will also be modified.
Fiscal Year Current (USD) Proposed (USD)
2010 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
2011 84,490.29 84,490.29
2012 863,624.97 863,624.97
2013 859,622.49 859,622.49
2014 1,926,869.67 1,926,869.67
2015 2,659,224.20 2,659,224.20
2016 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
13
2017 0.00 4,500,000.00
2018 0.00 2,556,168.00
Total 18,450,000.00 18,450,000.00
Other Change(s)
Change in Implementation Schedule
Explanation:
With extension of Project closing date the implementation schedule for the Project also changes. The key
milestones would be the following:
Substantial completion of LA R&R: 31 March 2016
Completion of all procurements: 31 March 2016
Launch of Naya Raipur BRT Lite: 31 December 2016
Launch of Pimpri-Chinchwad BRT: Corridor 3 – 31 December 2015; Corridor 4 – 31 March 2017
Launch of Indore ITS: 30 June 2017
Launch of Mysore PBS: 31 December 2016
Launch of Hubli-Dharwad BRT: 31 October 2017
ANNEX 1A: Results Framework and Monitoring
Project Development Objective (PDO): The project’s development objective (PDO) is to promote environmentally sustainable urban
transport in India and to improve the usage of environment-friendly transport modes through demonstration projects in selected cities.
Revised Project Development Objective (PDO):
PDO Level Results Indicators
Core D=
Dropped
C=
Continue
N= New
R= Revised
Unit of
Measure
Baseline
(2010) Actual
(2015)
Y7
(2016)
End Target
Y8
(2017)
Indicator One: The number of cities that develop an
identifiable urban transport planning process (i.e., managed
by professional units of government, following certain
procedures and guidance, and involving various levels of
analytical work and stakeholder’s participation) increases,
by project end
D Number 0 1 6
Indicator One: Number of environmentally friendly urban
transport practices and approaches provided by the project
that are adopted by cities
N Number 0 6
Indicator Two: Hubli Dharwad - Public transport mode
share increases
R Percent 30
33
Indicator Three: Pimpri Chinchwad - Modal share by
public transport increases
C
Percent 4.2 8.75 8
Indicator Four: Naya Raipur - Public Transport trip mode
share between Raipur and Naya Raipur increases
R Percent 0 36 40
Global Environmental Objective Indicators
Indicator One: The number of cities that develop an D Number 0 6
15
identifiable urban transport planning process (i.e., managed
by professional units/institutions of government, following
certain procedures and guidance, and inv
Indicator One: Number of environmentally friendly urban
transport practices and approaches provided by the project
that are adopted by cities
N Number 0 6
Indicator Two: Mode Shares in Pimpri-Chinchwad, Naya
Raipur, Hubli-Dharwad become more sustainable by Project
end
D Number
4.2
0
30
NA
8
50
0
Indicator Two: Forecast CO2 emissions over 10 years in
the cities participating in Component 2 are at least 128,000
tons lower than BAU forecasts
C Number 0
Intermediate Results Indicators (Component 1B)
Intermediate Result Indicator One: More states and cities
develop strategies for implementing the urban transport
reforms
D Number 0 5 2
Intermediate Result Indicator Two: MOUD partners with
states / cities to identify local issues and develop sustainable
local solutions
D Number 0 30 20
Intermediate Result Indicator One: MoUD partners with
states/cities to develop capacity and support cities in
sustainable local solutions
N Number 0 60 20
Intermediate Results Indicators (Component 2)
Intermediate Result Indicator One: Pimpri Chinchwad -
At project end, the BRT corridors developed in Pimpri will
carry at least 75 percent of their anticipated ridership for
that year
C
Percent 0
75
Intermediate Result Indicator Two: Pimpri Chinchwad –
Percentage of displaced families that are resettled in
alternative houses
N Percent 0 29 100
Intermediate Result Indicator Three: Naya Raipur – At C Number 0 2 2
16
least two Public Transport corridors are established and in
operation between Naya Raipur and Raipur
Intermediate Result Indicator Four: Naya Raipur – Safe
sidewalks and cycle tracks are provided on the main roads
of Naya Raipur
C Kilometer 0 5.2 36
Intermediate Result Indicator Five: Hubli Dharwad –
One BRT corridor in operation and carrying 75% of project
ridership.
D Percent 0 75
Intermediate Result Indicator Five: Hubli Dharwad –
BRT corridor is operational
N Text Not
operational
Construction
ongoing
Construction
ongoing
BRT is
Operational
Intermediate Result Indicator Six: Hubli Dharwad – Safe
pedestrian access to BRT
R Kilometer 0 0 22
Intermediate Result Indicator Seven: Hubli Dharwad -
Percentage of project affected people received
compensation and resettlement assistance.
N Percent 0 33 100
Intermediate Result Indicator Eight: Mysore - ITS
systems and units are installed, functioning, and utilized at
Mysore for at least 80% of their intended of revenue vehicle
kilometers of service by project end.
C Percent 0 86 80
Intermediate Result Indicator Nine: Indore - ITS systems
and units are installed, functioning, and utilized at Indore
for at least 80% of their intended of revenue vehicle
kilometers of service by project end.
C Percent 0 0 80
Intermediate Result Indicator Ten: - Roads constructed,
non-rural
D Kilometer 0 0.9 2.5
Intermediate Result Indicator Ten: Mysore PBS - PBS
system installed and functioning
C Text PBS
tendered
PBS
installed
PBS
installed
and
functioning
ANNEX 1B: Indicator Description
17
Indicator Name Description (indicator definition etc.) Frequency Data Source /
Methodology
Responsibility for Data
Collection
Project Development
Objective Indicators
Indicator One:
Number of environmentally
friendly urban transport
practices and approaches
provided by the project that are
adopted by cities
Adoption and / or implementation of urban
transport good practices and approaches
(such as UMTA, UTF, NMT master
planning, PBS, TOD, TMICC, NUTH,
private contracting of bus operators, city bus
modernisation plans, etc.) where direct
technical assistance was provided by the
Project under Component IB, whether
through TAs for Guidelines development or
mentoring support for ‘projects’ under
Leaders in Urban Transport Planning
(LUTP) training program.
Annual
Reports
Monitoring of
progress with
NUTP
implementation in
NURM
PMU
Global Environmental
Objective Indicators
Indicator One:
Number of environmentally
friendly urban transport
practices and approaches
provided by the project that are
adopted by cities
Same as PDO indicator above Continuous Monitoring of
progress with
NUTP
PMU
Intermediate Results
Indicators
Component 1
Intermediate Result
Indicator One:
MoUD partners with
states/cities to develop
The number of states and cities that are direct
beneficiaries of technical assistance from
MoUD under Component IB to help develop
sustainable local solutions in key urban
Annual
activity
reporting
PMU activity
reporting
PMU
18
capacity and support cities in
sustainable local solutions
transport areas and capacity building support
under LUTP with mentoring support on
‘projects’
Component 2
Intermediate Result
Indicator Two: Pimpri
Chinchwad - Percentage of
displaced families are resettled
in alternative houses
Quarterly Progress reports PIU
Intermediate Result
Indicator Five: Hubli
Dharwad – BRT corridor is
operational
BRT corridor between Hubli and Dharwad
are constructed and have services running
Before and
after reports
Site inspection and
technical audit
PIU
Intermediate Result
Indicator Seven: Hubli
Dharwad - Percentage of
people affected compensated
and provided resettlement
assistance.
Quarterly Monitoring reports PIU
ANNEX 1C: Results Framework Change Justification
PDO Level Results Indicators*
Status
Justification for Change
Indicator One: The number of
cities that develop an identifiable
urban transport planning process
(i.e., managed by professional
units of government, following
certain procedures and guidance,
and involving various levels of
analytical work and stakeholder’s
participation) increases, by project
end
Dropped This PDO indicator is unclear, and difficult to measure.
It does not capture the activities of the Component on
Capacity Development Assistance which seeks to
‘promote environmentally sustainable urban transport in
India’ as per the PDO. The emphasis of the capacity
building activities under component IB is to help urban
transport officials and agencies in a variety of urban
transport subjects that they may be dealing with, such
as, designing and implementing reform strategies,
planning and implementation of public transport and
non-motorized transport initiatives, transit oriented
development, etc. The capacity building activities are
not specifically designed to help create organizations,
develop systems and processes which ensure planned
urban transport investments. Such an initiative would
require sustained interaction with implementing
agencies of the kind possible with city demonstration
projects and or in the support offered for creation of
unified metropolitan transit agencies (UMTA). The
PDO indicators 2-4 already capture the second part of
the PDO ‘to improve the usage of environment-friendly
transport modes through demonstration projects in
selected cities’ and the direct impact of the city
demonstration project component.
Indicator One: Number of
environmentally friendly urban
transport practices and approaches
provided by the project that are
adopted by cities
New This new indicator is a clearer, more focused and
achievable indicator as it is directly based on the
activities of Component 1B which helps cities through
various TA activities in cutting edge areas of
environmentally sustainable urban transport, as well as
through mentoring support to officials on their ‘urban
transport projects and activities’ under LUTP. This
indicator captures the impact of Component 1B capacity
building initiatives on Indian cities by tracking the
adoption and or implementation of specific urban
transport good practices among cities that directly
benefited from technical assistance and handholding
support.
Indicator Two: Hubli Dharwad -
Public transport mode share
increases
Revised No target value for the end of project had been fixed for
this indicator. A fixed target has now been specified.
Indicator Four: Naya Raipur -
Public Transport trip mode share
between Raipur and Naya Raipur
increases
Revised The specified target of 50% mode share for public
transport is found to be quiet ambitious considering
trends in mode share in most cities. Accordingly, a
revised target of 40% is specified.
Global Environmental Objective
Indicators
20
Indicator One: The number of
cities that develop an identifiable
urban transport planning process
(i.e., managed by professional
units/institutions of government,
following certain procedures and
guidance, and inv
Dropped Same as above
Indicator One: Number of
environmentally friendly urban
transport practices and approaches
provided by the project that are
adopted by cities
New Same as above
Indicator Two: Mode Shares in
Pimpri-Chinchwad, Naya Raipur,
Hubli-Dharwad become more
sustainable by Project end
Dropped This indicator duplicates the GEO Indicator #3 as it
feeds into the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions.
Intermediate Results Indicators
Component 1
Intermediate Result indicator
One:
More states and cities develop
strategies for implementing the
urban transport reforms
Dropped These two indicators are duplicative as development of
strategies for implementing reforms at the local level
can also be interpreted as development of local
solutions. These have been replaced by a more
comprehensive indicator which better captures the
intermediate outcomes of Component IB i.e.
development of local solutions at the city level through
the technical assistance activities as well as mentoring
projects taken up under LUTP.
Intermediate Result indicator
Two:
MOUD partners with states / cities
to identify local issues and
develop sustainable local solutions
Dropped
Intermediate Result indicator
One:
MoUD partners with states/cities
to develop capacity and support
cities in sustainable local solutions
New This new indicator is more comprehensive and better
captures the intermediate outcomes of Component IB
i.e. development of local solutions at the city level
through the technical assistance activities as well as
mentoring projects taken up under LUTP.
Component 2
Intermediate Result Indicators
Two. Pimpri Chinchwad –
Percentage of displaced families
resettled in alternative houses
New This indicator is directly linked to the project activity.
Intermediate Result Indicator
Four: Hubli Dharwad – One BRT
corridor in operation and carrying
75% of project ridership.
Dropped The ridership levels on BRT corridors are already an
input into the mode share indicator of the PDO. Further,
the project supports a comprehensive public transport
solution in Hubli Dharwad and not just the BRT. Also,
given that the BRT would have been operational for
only a few months at the time of project closing this
indicator maybe difficult to achieve. This indicator is
therefore being dropped.
Intermediate Result Indicator
Four: Hubli Dharwad – BRT New This indicator is directly linked to the project outcome.
21
corridor is operational
Intermediate Result indicator
Five: Hubli Dharwad – Safe
pedestrian access to BRT
Revised No target value for the end of project had been fixed for
this indicator. A fixed target has now been specified.
Intermediate Indicator
Six: Hubli Dharwad - Percentage
of people affected compensated
and provided Resettlement
assistance.
New This indicator is directly linked to the project activity
and captures intermediate outcomes.
Intermediate Result indicator
Eight: - Roads constructed, non-
rural
Dropped This indicator measuring urban road constructed is
contrary to the project principle of priority to public
transport. This had earlier been included as it’s a core
sector indicator, however, as it does not represent the
intermediate outcome of the Project it is proposed to be
dropped.