worlds within worlds co-evolving designers and critics bio-inspired design processes gregory hornby,...

31
Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University Hod Lipson, Cornell University

Post on 21-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Wo

rld

s W

ith

in W

orl

ds

Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes

Gregory Hornby, UC Santa CruzJordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Hod Lipson, Cornell University

Page 2: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Conclusions

• Evolutionary design– Open ended, creative– Challenged by scalability, vague design goals

• Evolve designers, not designs– Generative systems that capture design rules

• Evolve critics that represent user tastes– Provoke users to learn their goals & preferences

• Algebra of user models and designers– Use multiple models to influence multiple designers

Page 3: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolution

Page 4: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 5: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Lipson & Pollack, Nature 406, 2000

Page 6: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

X-band antenna for NASA's ST-5 Mission

Page 7: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolving Photonic Structures

With Preble, Gondarenko, Robinson, Physical Review Letters, May 2006

Page 8: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Kinematic Synthesis

Peaucelier (1873)Silverster-Kempe (1877)

Page 9: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

• Evolutionary design– Open ended, creative– Challenged by scalability, vague design goals

Page 10: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolving Designers

Page 11: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Encoding designers with Modularity, Regularity and Hierarchy

Design Program: Executed Instructions:

Graphical version:

Page 12: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolving Table DesignersEvolving tables: fitness = height*surface area*stability/material.

No MRH enabled: MRH enabled:

Page 13: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolved TablesTable fitness = height*surface*volume / material

Page 14: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Families of Designs

Height: 8 16 24 32

• A single design program can be used to evolve a family of designs:

Page 15: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Evolving Critics

Page 16: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 17: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

A Simple Critic

Page 18: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Confidence vs. Uncertainty

Page 19: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 20: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 21: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Walter Benjamin

Page 22: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 23: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University
Page 25: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Louisville, KY, USAFabLab, Pretoria, South Africa

Rockefeller Univ., New York, USAScience Museum, London, UK

Page 26: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Watch band and Lego™ tire printed on a Fab@home

Page 29: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

User 1U

ser

2

User 1

Algebra of user models

Page 31: Worlds Within Worlds Co-evolving designers and critics Bio-inspired design processes Gregory Hornby, UC Santa Cruz Jordan Pollack, Brandeis University

Conclusions

• Evolutionary design– Open ended, creative– Challenged by scalability, vague design goals

• Evolve designers, not designs– Generative systems that capture design rules

• Evolve critics that represent user tastes– Provoke users to learn their goals & preferences

• Algebra of user models and designers– Use multiple models to influence multiple designers