wp 51929.2014 and connected matters
TRANSCRIPT
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
W.P. NO.51929/2014
C/W
W.P.NOS.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014,
797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014,
10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014,
13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014,
13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014,
14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014,
17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014,
23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014,
33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014,
34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014,
35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014,
36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014,
37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014,
38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014,
39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014,
41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014,
41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014,
44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014,
46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014,
47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014,
47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014,
49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014,
51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014,
53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014,
2
54358/2014, 54725/2014, 55081/2014, 55082/2014,
55083/2014, 55436/2014, 55671/2014, 56203/2014,
56300/2014, 56350/2014, 56646/2014, 56748/2014,
57076/2014, 57117/2014, 57150/2014, 57605/2014,
57606/2014, 58859/2014, 59794/2014, 60012/2014,
622/2015, 685/2015, 1958/2015, 2462/2015, 4591/2015,
5228/2015, 5664/2015, 6735/2015, 6981/2015, 7248/2015,
7277/2015, 7326/2015, 8277/2015, 8278/2015, 9135/2015,
9278/2015, 9488/2015, 9576/2015, 10923/2015,
11344/2015, 13201/2015, 14944/2015, 17240/2015,
18814/2015, 19213/2015, 20191/2015, 24417/2015,
24418/2015, 28143/2015, 28673/2015, 28676/2015,
28679/2015, 29317/2015, 29541/2015, 30781/2015,
31794/2015, 32423/2015, 33127/2015, 33128/2015,
33131/2015, 33133/2015, 33134/2015, 33137/2015,
35055/2015, 35464/2015, 35465/2015, 35842/2015,
37412/2015, 40838/2015, 44088/2015, 45662/2015,
47015/2015, 47820/2015, 47821/2015, 47822/2015,
47823/2015, 47824/2015, 47825/2015, 47826/2015,
47827/2015, 49842/2015, 49843/2015, 56271/2015,
57432/2015, 57434/2015, 57438/2015, 57439/2015,
57992/2015, 59004/2015, 59486/2015, 59492/2015,
59495/2015, 742/2016, 751/2016, 2392/2016, 2397/2016,
2915/2016, 5417/2016, 5446/2016, 5448/2016, 6717/2016,
6718/2016, 10318/2016, 11295/2016, 11493/2016,
11844/2016, 11846/2016, 12010/2016, 12674/2016,
13637/2016, 14280/2016, 14649/2016, 14650/2016,
15833/2016, 19019/2016, 19020/2016, 23623/2016,
23643/2016, 23656/2016, 24322/2016, 24676/2016,
24919/2016, 25131/2016, 25132/2016, 30680/2016,
33181/2016, 33196/2016, 33279/2016, 33385/2016,
3
34348/2016, 35687/2016, 35851/2016, 36525/2016,
37682/2016, 38430/2016, 38919/2016, 39001/2016,
40151/2016, 40240/2016, 41753/2016, 44127/2016,
44146/2016, 44246/2016, 46319/2016, 47314/2016,
47461/2016, 51143/2016, 51144/2016, 51145/2016,
51147/2016, 51352/2016, 51353/2016, 51355/2016,
51597/2016, 51707/2016, 51730/2016, 51875/2016,
51876/2016, 51877/2016, 51878/2016, 52141/2016,
52142/2016, 52928/2016, 53240/2016, 53525/2016,
53526/2016, 53527/2016, 53670/2016, 54364/2016,
54790/2016, 55126/2016,55667/2016, 55737/2016,
56022/2016, 56023/2016, 56971/2016, 56972/2016,
57149/2016, 57151/2016, 57709/2016, 57937/2016,
58218/2016, 58222/2016, 58734/2016, 59166/2016,
59168/2016, 59317/2016, 59793/2016, 60064/2016,
63172/2016, 63308/2016, 64534/2016, 64705/2016,
65118/2016, 65121/2016, 182/2017, 815/2017, 2066/2017,
3178/2017, 4293/2017, 4400/2017, 4511/2017, 5036/2017,
5037/2017, 5073/2017, 5207/2017, 5208/2017, 5213/2017,
5214/2017, 5218/2017, 5221/2017, 5301/2017, 5593/2017,
5936/2017, 6637/2017, 6998/2017, 6999/2017, 7000/2017,
7001/2017, 10503/2017, 10504/2017, 11782/2017,
12547/2017, 13456/2017, 14238/2017, 14626/2017,
14627/2017, 14628/2017, 14629/2017, 14630/2017,
14631/2017, 14632/2017, 14670/2017, 14868/2017,
15038/2017, 15588/2017, 18427/2017, 21361/2017,
24061/2017, 24065/2017, 24506/2017, 24508/2017,
24509/2017, 25120/2017, 26455/2017, 26456/2017,
26457/2017, 26458/2017, 28359/2017, 30485/2017,
31268/2017, 33191/2017, 35344/2017, 37044/2017,
40596/2017, 42836/2017, 43194/2017,
4
43207/2017, 45953/2017, 46333/2017, 46766/2017,
47823/2017, 47854/2017, 49031/2017, 50540/2017,
53428/2017, 54064/2017, 54863/2017, 55316/2017,
55317/2017, 56035/2017, 3157/2018, 3523/2018,
5448/2018, 8731/2018, 9190/2018, 12221/2018,
12792/2018, 25302/2018, 26667/2018, 27750/2018,
27947/2018, 30106/2018, 38977/2018, 39615/2018,
48266/2018, 53051/2018, 53250/2018, 56686/2018,
2939/2019, 8325/2019, 8329/2019, 12093/2019 15096/2019,
15199/2019, 15531/2019, 15532/2019, 15534/2019,
26852/2019, 50257/2019,
W.P.NOS. 10568/2015, 15003/2013, 14874/2014,
27833/2014, 42498/2014, 45230/2014, 47606/2014,
47607/2014, 58829/2014, 2935/2015, 2936/2015,
2937/2015, 6225/2015, 7038/2015, 7322/2015, 8111/2015,
8112/2015, 19086/2015, 21999/2015, 28675/2015,
34826/2015, 59793/2015, 1876/2016, 8603/2016,
8707/2016, 16505/2016, 20131/2016, 20132/2016,
34947/2016, 35309/2016, 39427/2016, 47965/2016,
51142/2016, 55666/2016, 57150/2016, 57245/2016,
58220/2016, 58223/2016, 58362/2016, 59167/2016,
59169/2016, 61955/2016, 63205/2016, 2531/2017,
5209/2017, 5212/2017, 37478/2017, 37480/2017 AND
19783/2018 (LA-BDA)
IN W.P.NO.51929/2014: BETWEEN:
SRI. K.P.ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS S/O. LATE K. PUTTAIAH R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
5
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD, I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-95
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D. IN W.P.NO.42063/2012: BETWEEN: 1. K.G.G. NAYAR S/O SRI GOPALA PILLAI
6
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT 4TH BLOCK, SHIVARAMAKARANTHNAGAR POST, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 2. M P MUNIRAJU S/O SRI M. PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 8, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SHAMMANNA GOWDA LAYOUT, SARASWATHIPURA, ULSOOR, BANGALORE 560 008 3. NAGARAJU H L S/O SRI LINGAIAH H.B. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO 660, 4TH MAIN, NEAR MADHU BAR BUILDING, PIPELINE, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE 560 050 4. N ASHOKARAJU S/O SRI N LAKSHMANARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO 2, 3RD MAIN ROAD, JALADARSHINI LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD, BANGALORE 560 094 5. K V RAMESH S/O SRI K S VENKATASUBBAIAH AGEDA BOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.114, GELLI APARTMENT, 47TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR 8TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 082 6. KOTHANDARAMA R S/O SRI R.S.RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.129, JEWELLERS' STREET,
BANGALORE 560 001 7. T KALAISELVAN S/O SRI G THANGAVELU
7
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO 102, 3RD CROSS, 5TH MAIN, BYATARAYANAPURA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE 560 026 8. ASHWATHANARAYANACHAR S/O SRI VEERABHADRACHAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO 101, 3RD A MAIN, SOMESHWARANAGAR, C.B. SANDRA, GKVK POST, BANGALORE 560 065 9. M V NARASIMHAPRASAD S/O M N VASUDEVA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO 314, 12TH A MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALROE 560 010 10. C SREEDHARAN S/O SRI N RARUKUTTI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT NO G 1, GROUND FLOOR, OM SAI, S V CROWN APARTMENTS, NO 183, A3, 6TH G CROSS, KAGGADASAPURA, C V RAMAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 093 11. B L RAMAMURTHY S/O SRI B N LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO M 65, MARKET ROAD, 7TH CROSS ROAD, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURA, NAGAPPA BLOCK, BANGALORE 560 021 12. MANOHARAN K S/O SRI K KANDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 81, I CROSS, 4TH MAIN, PADMANABHANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 070
13. NARAYANASETTY S/O SRI LAKSHMASETTY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO 73, 18TH MAIN,
8
AICOBOONAGAR, BTM I STAGE, BANGALORE 560 068 14. N SHANKARACHAR S/O SRI NANJUNDACHAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO 530/3, 13TH A CROSS, 11TH A MAIN ROAD, SECTOR A, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE 560 064 15. L RAMESH S/O SRI LINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.455, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040 16. SMT DEEPTI M SHAH W/O SRI SYED MAQSOOD SHAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.D3, 801, BDA FLAT, AUSTIN TOWN LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 047 17. CHANDRARAO S S/O SRI SUBBARO B AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.120, 1ST CROSS ROAD, GORAKAMANTHANAPALYA, BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE-560 075 18. S.V. SUNDARARAJAN S/O SRI S VISWANATHAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A NO.8/13, 4TH D CROSS, MADIWALA EXTENSION, MARUTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 068
19. P.K. DESHPANDE S/O SRI K DESHPANDE AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A NO.393, 6TH MAIN,
9
3RD BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT, VIDHYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE-560 097
20. SANDEEP S S/O SRI SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.E-49/3, DRDO TOWNSHIP, C.V. RAMAN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 083
21. B.R. MURALIDHAR S/O SRI V RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.395, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR MILK COLONY POST, NEAR VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE, BANGALORE-560 055
22. G. SEENASWAMY S/O SRI GUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.87, SRI MANJUNATHA NILAYA, 14TH CROSS, ULLAL ROAD, MUNESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 056
23. RAMESHA M.R. S/O SRI M RAMAKRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.51/43, 22 MAIN ROAD, III CROSS, BTS GARAGE BACKSIDE VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040
24. SRIDHAR K C
S/O SRI K.V. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A NO.20, I MAIN, VAISHNAVI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 097
25. SMT. RATHI POONACHA W/O SRI K.K. POONACHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO. 69, 'ANUGRAHA',
10
2ND CROSS, 10TH MAIN, BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032
26. C.S. NARAYANASWAMY S/O SRI C.R. SHIVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.55, GREEN FIELDS-III, DODDAKALLASANDRA, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 062
27. C M JOYAPPA S/O SRI MEDAPPA C N AGEDA BOUT 59 YEARS, M. GRAPHITE INDIA LTD. MAHADEVAPURA, WHITEFIELD ROAD BANGALORE-48
28. K RAMANNA S/O SRI KAATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO 868, 2ND E MAIN ROAD, RAMAIAH LAYOUT, KACHARAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE 560 084 29. L GOPINATHAN S/O SRI LAKSHMINARAYANACHAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 30, SUSHMA NIVAS, APPA RAO LAYOUT, 2ND MAIN, I CROSS, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, BANGALORE 560016
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. G. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST EXTENSION T CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE 560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISIONER 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
11
VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001 3. A V RAVIPRAKASH S/O SRI A VENKATARAM AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO 99, 4TH CROSS, I BLOCK, JAYANAGAR EAST, BANGALORE 560 011 4. A V SRIRAM S/O SRI A VENKATARAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO 20, 2ND MAIN, I BLOCK BANASHANKARI 3RD PHASE, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE 560085. …RESPONDENTS (SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR BY B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2; SRI. DEEPAK J, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OR
DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 3.10.2007 ISSUED BY R2 UNDER ANNX-G.
IN W.P.NO.30494/2013: BETWEEN: 1. S. VENKATESH S/O. SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. S.RAMESH REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
3. S.NAGARAJ REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
12
4. S. SURENDRA REDDY S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHALLAKERE VILALGE, RING ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P.KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKARNARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE AND SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDROSEMENT DATED 25.2.2013 PRODUCED AT ANN-L.
IN W.P.NO.42671/2013:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SUBBAMMA W/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
13
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
2. SRI.RAVI KUMAR R S/O. LATE SRI.B.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
BOTH R/A NO.80, JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.R. VENKATESH MURTHY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S. NISCHAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-A & B VIZ
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.23.2.04.
IN W.P.NO.638/2014: BETWEEN: S.R. GOVINDAPPA SINCE REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS 1(a). SMT.S.R.GAYATHRI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O. LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA,
14
NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064
1(b). G.GAURAV AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA, NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE-560 064
1(c). G.GAGAN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O.LATE S.R.GOVINDAPPA, NO.48/2, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE AND SRI. H. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 (REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER)
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN REPSECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF SY.NO.58/1 OF SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIOND ATED 3.2.2013 VIDE ANN-K AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.2.2004 VIDE ANN-L ARE
15
DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013.
IN W.P.NO.797/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI.N.RAMAIAH S/O. LATE NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HEANNUR MAIN ROAD, KAVERI SERVICE STATION, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DT. 5.11.2013 ISSUED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-G.
16
IN W.P.NO.1089/2014: BETWEEN: MOHAN K.REDDY S/O. LATE B.N.KAMALANABHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A NO.176, GANDHI STREET, KAMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 084
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT. 3.2.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE BDA ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LANDS ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THE SCHEME OF THE BDA.
IN W.P.NO.3211/2014: BETWEEN:
SMT.DHANALAKSHMI W/O. VENKATARAMU V AGED 60 YEARS, R/O NO.34, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMANAGAR,
17
BANGALORE-560 027 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.13.1.2012 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT. IN W.P.NO.3389/2014: BETWEEN: MR.JOKIM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O.SRI.ANNAYAPPA, R/A NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK, VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI, R.T.NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 016
18
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; BY SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER AS AT ANN-C.
IN W.P.NO.6180/2014: BETWEEN: 1. G.SRINIVAS S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 2. MUNEGOWDA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 3. SRI. RAMAMURTHY S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR, (ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045. 4. VENKATESH
S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR,
19
(ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO RE-DO THE EXERCISE OF DE-NOTIFYING THE
LAND IN SY.NO.81/1 EXTENT 2 ACRES OF PETITIONERS LAND
SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM, HOBLI
BANGALORE EAST TQ. PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION IN WP
NO.15286/06 DT. 20.11.2006.
IN W.P. NO.10356/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
20
R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 064.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADASHIVAIAH K.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, DEPT. OF HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560 001. 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK (WEST) BANGALORE - 560 020. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REPORT
SUBMITTED BY THE R-3 DATED 29.12.2009 AND ISSUED TO THE
PETITIONER ON 07.12.2013 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AS PER ANNX-Q.
IN W.P. NO.12014 /2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. TEJARAM S/O RAMLAL AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND STREET
21
1ST CROSS, VENKATESHAPURA MAIN ROAD, PILLANNA GARDEN BANGALORE - 560 045. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. UMESH B.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER HIS REPRESENTATION DATED 12.12.2005 VIDE ANN-C AND ALSO HIS CASE FOR DELETION OF HIS PROPERTY IN SY. NO.44, PROPERTY NO.44, SITE NO.2, KHATA NO.1150 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, NOW IN BANGALORE EAST TALUK, MEASURING 75 FT. X 23+27/2, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1,875 SQ.FT.
ON THE DIRECTIONS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND HON'BLE SUPREME COURT. IN W.P. NO.12015/2014: BETWEEN: 1. ABDUL MAJEED S/O HASSAIN SAHIB AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
22
R/AT: NO.35, LAL MASJID A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051. 2. MUZAMIL PASHA S/O ABDUL MAJEED AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT: NO. 35, LAL MASJID A STREET, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 051. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.V.SHIVA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MULTISOTIRED BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3; BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO DELET THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS
FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR
THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, I.E., 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF
LAND IN SYNO.42 AND 5 1/2 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY.NO.43;
6723SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 1ST PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND
6724 SQ. FEET OF LAND OF 2ND PETITIONER IN SY. NO.44; AND
THE ABOVE SAID SY NOS. BELONGING TO THANISANDRA
23
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK AS
PER ANNX-D.
IN W.P. NO.13043/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 2. SMT. PREMA RAMACHANDRAN W/O R. RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. BOTH RESIDING AT NO. 1 4TH MAIN IST STAGE MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
24
SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED N THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13045/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. REKHA BALAKRISHNAN W/O N. BALAKRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 2. SRI. N. BALAKRISHNAN S/O K. NARAYANAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. BOTH RESIDING AT NO.1 4TH MAIN, IST STAGE ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 024.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITYM KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.
25
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-C AND D VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13206/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. SAJAN K CHACKO
S/O K.J. CHACKO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.12, 2ND MAIN ROAD SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP W/O SRI. SAJAN K. CHACKO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/A NO.12, 2ND MAIN ROAD SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 032. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING
26
BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT. IN W.P. NO.13207/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. VIJI PHILIP @ VARGHESE PHILIP S/O V.K. PHILIP AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12 2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 PRESENTLY WORKING AT: DOHA, QUATAR. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS ANILA VARGHESE PHILIP D/O SRI. GEORGE PHILIP AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12
27
2ND MAIN ROAD, SULTHANPALYA R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-B AND C
VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE
KARNATAKA GAZETTE OF 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 23.02.2004 AND CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE
MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT.
IN W.P. NO.13398/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MUNI KUPPANNA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS.
28
2. CHINNA THAYAPPA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS. 3. SRI. CHINNA VENKATAPPA S/O LATE GINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS.
4. SRI. M. MUNIYAPPA S/O SRI MUNI VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.30 SRIRAMPURA OLD VILLAGE JAKKUR POST BANGALORE - 560 0564. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. YUGANDHIR, ADVOCATE FOR P2 TO P4 SRI. J. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K., ADVOCATE SRI. SANTHOSH S. NAGARALE, ADVOCATE FOR P4) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA KRUPA ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BDA BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 BDA TO
TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS LAND
BEARING SY. NO. 49/4 MEASURING 1.01 AG IN SRIRAMPURA
29
VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE PURSUANT TO THE
FINAL REPORT DATED 30.10.2013 VIDE ANN-F.
IN W.P NO.13774/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. MUNAWAR BURHAN S/O LATE KHADER BURHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 206, 19TH CROSS 1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI.B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE R2 AND R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE NO MANNER OF RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
30
IN W.P. NO.14149/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. N. RAMAIAH S/O LATE SRI. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.708, HENNUR MAIN ROAD NEAR CAUVERY SERVICE STATION KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001
BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS ABANDONED OR LAPSED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE/GIVE UP OR EXCLUDE THE SCHEDULE PROPERLY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.
31
IN W.P NO.14161/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT. REKHA SHARMA W/O DEEPAK SHARMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 109 ITI LAYOUT, BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE-560 046 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAN S/O LATE N. RAMAKRISHNA IYER AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1 4TH MAIN, IST STAGE MSH LAYOUT, ANANDNAGAR BANGALORE-560 024.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560003 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST
32
PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 003. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX-B & C VIZ PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATKA GAZETE OF 03.02.2003 & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 & CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THAT THE MAHAZAR AS VOID DOCUMENT.
IN W.P.NO.14494/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. RAJAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, WIFE OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA
2. SRI. KALLESH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, SON OF D.M.MUNIKRISHNAPPA,
3. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WIFE OF PAPANNA,
4. SMT. KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, WIFE OF CHOWDAPPA,
5. SRI. LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHENNAMMA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
33
MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRLIMINARY NOTIFICATION ANNX-T DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNX-AC DATED 23.02.2004 & UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED 12.11.2013 AT ANNX-D. IN W.P NO.14502/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. ADINARAYANA M S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT # 633 NEAR BALAJI KALYAN MANTAP VMK ROAD, H A FARM POST DASARAHALLI BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
34
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY ITS PRICIPAL SECRETARY M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI SUBRAMANI S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 5. SRI KANDAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. SRI RAMESH S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. SRI LAKSHMANA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 054. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; JAYPEE ASSOCIATES FOR R5-R7 SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF R-4 TO 7 DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANNX-P.(II) QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT
35
ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO 7 DATED 31.05.2012 VIDE ANNX-T AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 14521/ 2014: BETWEEN: SRI ANWAR PASHA S/O LATE MUMTAZ HUSSAIN, R/O.THNISANDRA, KRISHNA RAJAPURAM, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. SINCE DECEASED BY LRS: 1. SMT. JAMEELA BEGUM W/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI. IMRAN PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 3. SRI ANSAR PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 4. SRI. WASEEM PASHA S/O ANWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.13, 3RD CROSS, HUDSON ROAD, LINGARAJAPURAM ST. THOMAN TOWN, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560 084 KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SURESH S. LOKRE, ADVOCATE FOR P1 TO P4) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPT.OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
36
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P.WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & R-2 TO
CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATIONS DATED
10.03.2014 VIDE ANN-N, TO DENOTIFY THE PETITIONER'S LANDS
BEARING SY.NOS 85/1A, 85/1B, 85/1C AND 85/2 TOTALLY
MEASURING 2.38 ACRES, SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
KRISHNA RAJAPURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
IN W.P NO. 14689/ 2014:
BETWEEN: SRI. S. SHANTHA KUMAR S/O SANDHYAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO. 60, CHOSAPPA LAAYOUT VEERANNA PALYA AREBIC COLLEGE POST
BANGALORE-560045 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING
37
BANGALORE-560 001. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE- 560 020 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 NOT TO UNDERTAKE ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 16646/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O JINGARAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O SRIRAMAPURA JAKKUAR POST YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY L.K., ADVOCATE)
38
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA OFFICIAL GAZETTE DATED 23.02.2004 IN PART-III NO.274, AS CONTAINED IN ANNEX-E, AS FAR AS ITS RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY. IN W.P NO. 17051/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
DR. HEMAVATHI HEGDE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O RAJ BALLAL NO.25, SHANTHINIKETHAN APARTMENTS
39
SECTOR A, AMRUTHNAGAR
BANGALORE-560 092. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPALAN R., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PRAYING DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO EXECUTE A LEASE CUM SALE DEED AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION OF THE ALLOTED SITE BEARING NO. 57, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - XVI MEASURING 15 METERS X 24 METERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AT THE EARLIEST AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 17594/ 2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAIAH, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK NOTE: BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
40
MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 DATED 28.03.2014 WHICH
IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 19729/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHAILA PRABHU NEE SHEVGOOR W/O SRI.SUDHIR R.PRABHU, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.406, BLOCK I, KRISHNA APARTMENTS, ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052. 2. SMT. LATHA SHEVGOOR KAMATH D/O SRI.G.K.SHEVGOOR, AGED 46 YEARS,
REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT.JAYANTHI SHEVGOOR, RESIDING AT NO.502, BLOCK I, KRISHNA APARTMENTS,
41
ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE-560052.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDAH, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A. LOKANATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE SCHEDULE LANDS BELONGING
TO THE PETITIONERS FROM ACQUISITION FOR ARKAVATHY
LAYOUT AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 21158/ 2014: BETWEEN: M/S PRAMOD MODERN EDUCATION TRUST, (REGD.) NO.33, CHALAKERE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANASWADI POST,
42
BANGALORE-560 043, REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECRETARY, V.VENKATARAMA REDDY
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE-560 001, REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT BDA TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED
25.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-H AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 23897/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT K. S. VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O K.C. CHOWDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.19, ANANDNAGAR EXTENSION, SUMANGALI SEVA ASHRAMA ROAD,
43
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.N. ASWATHANARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. COWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. KARNATAKA STATE KHADI GRAMODYOGA WORKERS HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.10, JASMA BHAVAN ROAD, (MILLERS TANK BUND ROAD), BANGALORE, 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO FOR R2; SRI. B. RUDRAGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 27.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2-B.D.A. ANNEX-M AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 28861/ 2014: BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O ANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/A NO.63, SAMPIGEHALLI
44
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 2. SRI. GOVINDARAJU S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/3, SAMPIGEHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 3. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O MUNI VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.30, SAMPIGEHALLI, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE 4. SRI. VENKATASWAMY S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A NO.31, SAMPIGEHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020
REPTD., BY ITS COMMISSIONER
45
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRILIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE ANNX-B AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 30731/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT. ERAMMA W/O LATE BUDANNA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/A SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE, MARAMMA TEMPLE, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA POST, BANGALORE- 560 001. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. HEMANTH RAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560 020. 2. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560 020.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING AND
46
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT SCHEME PREPARED BY THE BDA FOR FORMATION OF "ARKAVATI LAYOUT" HAS LAPSED AS CONTEMPLATED U/S.27 OF THE BDA ACT 1976 & AS WELL AS SUBSECTION(1) & (2) OF THE SECTION 25 OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION & TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE LANDS IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 31723/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAMMED MUJAHID ALI S/O MOHAMMED HYDER, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.52, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGARA HOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.- 560 077 2. SRI. SYED FAROOQULLA HUSSAINY S/O SYED NOORULLA HUSSINY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGARA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077 3. SRI. M. SIRAJ UDDIN S/O LATE MUSTAFFA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, GEDDALAHALLI,
VINAYAKANAGARA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK -560 077
47
4. SRI. ILYAS PASHA S/O LATE ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKA NAGAR, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077 5. SRI. SHAIK ASLAM S/O AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT NO. 14, GEDDALAHALLI, VINAYAKANAGAR, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560 002. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT 1976 VIDE NO. BDA/COMMR/ALAO /LA9/104/2002-03 DATED 03/02/2013 (ANNEXURE-A) AND NOTIFICATION ISSUED
48
U/SEC.19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD 193 MNX, BANGALORE, DATED 23/02/2004 (ANNEXURE-B) ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT HAS LAPSED/ IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33774/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE H. APPANNAGOWDA, 2. SRI H. KODANDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, 3. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O H.SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, ALL RESIDIENT OF K.NARAYANAPURA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK- 560 077.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
49
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. G.LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. K.A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYAN RAO, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT: 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-G AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33777/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA, 2. SRI RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE MUNINANJAPPA, 3. SRI KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. MUNINANJAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF SAMPIGEHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 064.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
50
AND; 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 4. B. BYRANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O SRI. K.B. BYRANNA, NO. 3016, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, RPC, LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-40 5. PRABHAKAR. S. SHENOY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. SRI. SUNDAR SHENOY NO. 28, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN, 3RD CROSS SARASWATHI NAGAR VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 40 6. KANTHARAJU S/O K.R. ISHWARAIAH NO.14 ANNAPURNESHWARI NAGAR, MUDALAPALYA, NEAR VIJAYANAGAR EDUCATION SOCIETY BANGALORE-72
7. K. RAJASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O SRI. KEMPEGOWDA NO. 56, 9TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, 14TH PHASE, 7TH BLOCK
51
GURURAJA LAYOUT , BSK 3RD STATE, BENGALURU-85. 8. D. MANOHARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O DURAISWAMY NO.5, 4TH MAIN, NEAR PALANI BUILDING SWATANTRANAGAR SRIRAMPURA BANGALORE-21. 9. D. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE D. GUNDU RAO, NO.38, 8TH 'B'MAIN 1ST CROSS , SRINIDHI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-97 10. P. CHANDRASHEKARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O. S. RAMAMURTHY NO.76, NANJAPPA LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE-97 11. HUSSAIN SAB KALIMIRCHI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O CHANDU SAB NO. 146, 4TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS BEML LAYOUT, ITPL ROAD THUBARAHALLI BANGALORE-66 12. SMT. GIRIJA PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O. H.N. SRINIVASA PRAKASH NO. 18, PANCHAVATI APARTMENTS, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
SRIRAMPURA BANGALORE-21
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
52
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED RESPONDENTS) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-G AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 34084/ 2014: BETWEEN: SMT KAMALAMMA WIFE OF HANUMANTHAPPA, GRAND DAUGHTER OF M.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT: 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT NO. 31, SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE -560064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.S. BHAT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. N.K. KANTHARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020 2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE 560020 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX,
R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE 560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
53
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE 560032 5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE 560001. s …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE R-1
TO 5 HAVE NO RIGHT OR WHATSOEVER TO DEMOLISH THE
PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.40(CURRENT
SY.NO.40/P1P1), MEASURING 2 ACRES 16 GUNTAS SITUATED AT
SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, JAKKUR PANCHAYAT, YELAHANKA
HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ., BANGALORE AND PRESENTLY
COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF BBMP WITHOUT THE
PROPERTY BEING NOTIFIED FOR ACQUISITION IN THE
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DT: 03.02.2003 & FINAL
NOTIFICATION DT 23.02.2004 AND IS IN THE BBMP
JURISDICTION AND THE R-1 TO 3 DO NOT GET JURISDICTION.
IN W.P NO. 34259/ 2014: BETWEEN: 1. SHRI H B SHIVARAM S/O LATE H.K.BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,. 2. SHRI. H.B. SRINIVASA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. SHRI. H.B.SOMASHEKAR
54
S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4. SHRI. H.B. CHIDANANDA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. SHRI. H.B. DAYANANDA S/O LATE H.K. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 6. SMT. R. ANURADHA SUDHAKAR W/O LATE H.B. SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL RESIDING AT NO.40, I CROSS, SHANTHIVANA, SANJEEVINI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 092.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.V. NISHANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE - 560 001, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
4. M/S SHANTHA INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES A PARTNERSHIP ENTERPRISES HAVING OFFICE AT MAVALLI CHIKKANNA CHARITIES BUILDING SUBEDAR CHATRAM ROAD,
55
BANGALORE- 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. GEORGE PHILIP, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. B.VACHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-D TO THE W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P NO.34272/ 2014: BETWEEN: MRS NILOFER GEORGE AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O LATE MR PRABHAKARAN GEORGE R/AT NO.95/50, TIRUMANGALAM ROAD VILLIVAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 049 BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY MR SHAM MOHAN S/O MOHAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.300, 10TH CROSS BDS NAGAR, K NARAYANAPURA BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE 560 001
56
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE 560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE 560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH TH II FINAL NOTIFICATION DT. 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-P AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 34391/ 2014: BETWEEN:
SRI.P.SRINIVASAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE M.PUTTANNA, R/AT NO.127, S.P.NILAYA, K.NARAYANAPURA, KOTHANUR POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE, BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560001.
57
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T.C., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 BANGALORE DTD 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX-F AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35204/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O T C CHINNASWAMY REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY 2. SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY 3. SRI T H BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C HEMANNA REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER T.C.HEMANNA S/O LATE CHIKKANNA. 4. SRI T C HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA
58
5 . SRI T C CHINNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI T C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O SRI T C CHINNASWAMY ALL RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE
KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT IE., ANNEXURE-K IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.94/1 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
59
EAST TQ. MEASURING 2 ACRES 38 GUNTAS (INCLUDING 3 GUNTAS KHARAB) AND ETC., IN WP NO.35243/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O KEMPANNA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 077. 2. SRI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O MUNISHAMAPPA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560 077. 3. SRI SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O RAMAIAH R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE KRISHANARAJAPURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
60
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHANKAR NARAYANA RAO AND
SRI. K. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35247/2014: BETWEEN: 1. A.APPANNA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS S/O LATE ANJINAPPA
2. A. MUNEGOWDA
S/O SRI.T.THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
3. A.SATISH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O A.APPANNA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING
61
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. THARANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
IN WP NO.35305/2014:
BETWEEN:
C.SANTAMARIA AGED 65 YEARS D/O PETER A. SANTAMARIA NO.4, DAVIS ROAD RICHARDS TOWN BANGALORE-560 084.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPIREDDY G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
62
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PRLY. NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-E. IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN WP NO.35609/2014: BETWEEN: 1. V.PRAKASH
S/O SRI P.D.VIJAYAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.19, 1ST CROSS OIL MILL ROAD, SAIT PALYAM LINGARAJAPURAM BANGALORE-560 084.
2. E.MEERA BAI
W/O SRI.J.VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.4/16, PARSN RIVIER IV MAIN ROAD EXTENSION KOTTURPURAM CHENNAI-600 085.
3. MRS.M.E.SUJATHA
W/O SRI.R.HARIHARADAS
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.3/20, FOURT MAIN ROAD KOTTUR GARDENS CHENNAI – 600 085.
...PETITIONERS
63
(BY SRI. H.R.ANANTHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT URBAN AND HOUSING MULTI-STORIED BUILDING VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P. WEST, BANGALORE.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K.P. WEST, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-F ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AND ETC. IN WP NO.36164/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.VENKATAMMA
W/O RAMAIAH MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2. SRI R.SAMPANGIRAMAIAH
S/O RAMAIAH MAJOR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE
64
K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-561 009. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.C.VISWESHWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AS
ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT,
ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL
RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN WP NO.36166/2014:
BETWEEN: 1. SMT.MUNIVEERAMMA
W/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
65
2. SRI RAJKUMAR
S/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
3. SMT.VARALAKSHMI
D/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
4. SRI NAGESH
S/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT K.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.C.VISWESHWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE 2ND
66
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AS ULTRAVIRES OF THE POWERS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT, ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC. IN WP NO.36489/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI SYED NOORULLA
S/O SYED AHMED AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
2. SMT.MUMTAZ BEGUM
W/O SYED NOORULLA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.25, GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.
3. SMT. MEHER AYESHA
D/O SYED EHUSHAMUDDIN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.103, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.
4. MRS.LAIQHA KHADRI
W/O MOHAMMED SUHEB AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.42, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.
5. SRI.MOHAMMED IBRAHIM
S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.82, GEDDAHALLI KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.
6. SRI.MOHAMMED JAWED ALAM
S/O MOHAMMED BADIUZZAMA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.12, GEDDALAHALLI
67
KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077.
7. SRI.YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI
S/O AHMEDULLA KHAN GHORI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
8. SMT.NASEEBA BANO
W/O SRI. YENAYATHULLA KHAN GORI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS SL.NO.7 & 8 ARE R/AT NO.23 & 24 GEDDALAHALLI, KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 077. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560 002.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION OF THE AND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDETS IN
PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 17(1) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE-A) AND
NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE NO.UDD
193 MNX, BANGALORE DATED 23.02.2004 (ANNEXURE-B)
ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED / IS ABANDONED IN SO FAR
68
THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND
ETC.
IN WP NO.36525/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
2. SRI MUNIRAJU S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
3. SRI BACHE GOWDA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
4. SRI ANJANAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
5. SRI T.BAIRE GOWDA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA @ THIMMIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
(ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064.) ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.C.VISWESHWARAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER) KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
69
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE DATED
18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.979,
SY.NO.30 (NEW SY.NO.30/1) MEASURING 07 ACRES 00 GUNTAS
OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU
NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.36971/2014: BETWEEN: SRI SRINIVAS J. S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS SADASHIVANAGARA BENGALURU-560 030. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. SHIVANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER) KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
70
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE RE-
MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 BANGALORE
DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS SERIAL
NO.845, SY.NO.76/2 MEASURING 00 ACRES 23 GUNTAS OF
JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH
TALUK, BENGALURU AND ETC.
IN WP NO.37446/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DODDAPAPAMMA
AGED 81 YEARS WIFE OF LATE K.S.THIMMAIAH RESIDING AT NO.88/A KETHARAMANAHALLI, I BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010.
2. SMT. SUNITA PATIL
AGED 32 YEARS WIFE OF UMESH PATIL RESIDING AT H.NO.2153, D-BLOCK OPPOSITE CORPORATION BANK SAHAKARNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C.M.NAGABHUSHANA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA
71
BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BINPIN HEGDE AND SRI. B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI/ANOTHER OTHER ORDER/DIRECTION OF SIMILAR
NATURE QUASHING ANNEXURE-K DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY
THE R1. IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THE HON’BLE COURT HOLDS
THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-K,
THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT ANNEXURE-M
DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.38055/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA
2. SRI.VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA
3. SRI.CHIKKAPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE SONNAPPA
72
4. SMT.MUNILAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY
ALL RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR AND SRI. I.G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38463/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR. CONRAD KING
S/O MR.ARNOLD KING AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
73
2. MRS. LYNETTE LOUISE KING
W/O MR.CONRAD KING AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.JEFFERY DAVID KING S/O ARNOLD KING, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.108/6 APURVA MAPLES, APARTMENTS G-14 4TH FLOOR, 5TH BLOCK 1ST MAIN, HENNUR, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 084. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. NALEENA LOGAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK BANGALORE-560 020. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
4. MR.M.C.NARAYANASWAMY
S/O MR.CHANGALVARAYA NAIDU …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 R4 DELETED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.05.2019)
74
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEDURE-G ISSUED BY THE R1, SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN WP NO.38471/2014 BETWEEN: JOSEPH C. AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA NO.B2, MANYATHA RESIDENCY RACHENAHALLI, NAGAWARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-45. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE
75
KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE
ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.,
IN WP NO.38472/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY
SON OF LATE SRI D.CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. SMT REBECCA JAMES
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS WIFE OF SRI JAMES RAJU REDDY
3. SMT J.RANITHA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
4. SMT J.RONILLA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS DAUGHTER OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
5. SRI J.DAVID RAJ REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS SON OF SRI C.JAMES RAJU REDDY
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.140, D.CHOWRAPPA LAYOUT ERANNAPALAYA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BAGNLORE – 560 045. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
76
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-D IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN WP NO.38661/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.R.NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.268/A VENKATE GOWDA LAYOUT NEAR VENKATESHWAR TEMPLE KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
2. SRI R.M. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS H.R.B.R., I BLOCK, KALYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 043.
3. SMT. K.R.RUKMINIAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS D/O LATE G. RAMAIAH &
W/O SRI V.BACHE GOWDA 4. SMT. B.PREETHI
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS D/O SRI V. BACHE GOWDA
77
3 & 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.9 1ST MAIN ROAD, G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
5. SMT. K.R. MANJULA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS D/O LATE G.RAMAIAH R/AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN ROAD G.RAMAIAH LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C.M. NAGABHUSHANA, AND SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 7 R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-G
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF
THIS HON’BLE COURT HOLDS THAT RESPONDENTS HAVE
78
POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-G THAN TO DECLARE THAT,
DECLARTION AT ANNEXURE-J DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO
EXISTS AND ETC.
IN WP NO.38753/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.C.SAVITRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE M.RAMAIAH R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026.
2. SRI.R.VASUDEVAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LATE M.RAMAIAH R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 026. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
79
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY R1 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39383/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.N.KANTHARAJU S/O N. NARASIMHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.72 8TH MAIN,BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE,BANGALORE-560 076 2. SRI K. HEMANTH S/O N. KANTHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, DECEASED SON OF SMT T. N. CHANDRAVATHI R/AT NO.2/35, 2ND "C" MAIN ROAD, 6TH "D"CROSS,BOOPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560 054 3. MRS. MARY VARGHESE W/O SUNNY VARGHESE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/T NO.571, SUNNY'S NEST, SUBBANNA PALYA, 2ND CROSS,BANASWADI BANGALORE-560 043 4. MR BANKIM D' SHAH S/O DHANSHUKLAL R. SHAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
5. MRS AMITHA B. SHAH W/O BANKIM D SHAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE
80
R/AT NO.201 "ARIHANTH" GOVINDANAGAR,BORIBALI WEST MUMBAI-400 098 6. SMT LAVANYA S MURALI W/O S MURALI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.213, 6TH CROSS,R R TEMPLE STREET, DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM,BANGALORE-560 036 7. SMT T A GOWRI W/O K NARENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.33/659, VARMA LAYOUT,VIDYASARAGA, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, SHIVARAMA KARANTH POST, BANGALORE-560 077 8. SRI P. U. KANNAN S/O P. UMAMANI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.277, SECTOR-C,JALAVAYU VIHA KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE-560 54 9. SRI VEERESH CHANNAVEERAIAH HIREMATH,S/O CHANNAVEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.TYPE-III/7 IVRI,HEBBAL BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
81
2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEX-A DATED
18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE
INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX-A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39633/2014: BETWEEN: SRI SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O MUNIYAPPA, R/AT SRIRAMPURA, KASABA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560 029
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKAR ACHAR, ADVOCATE SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
82
M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-C
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 39832/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKATHYAPPA, AGED 80 YEARS, R/AT CHEELLAKERE VILLAGE, KALAYANAGAR & POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., BANGALORE DISTRICT-560045 (NOT CLAIMED SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFIT)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA AND SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. PATEL, ADVOCATES)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
83
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-1 REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003,
PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF
THE PETITIONER'S LAND BEARING SY.NO.129/2 MEASURING 25
GUNTAS OUT OF 30 GUNTAS, LAND BEARING SY.NO.133/1
MEASURING 32 GUNTAS OUT OF 1 ACRE 2 GUNTAS, LAND
BEARING SY.NO.133/2 MEASURING 6 GUNTAS & LAND BEARING
SY.NO.133/3 MEASURING 5 GUNTAS, SITUATE AT CHELLAKERE
VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEX-M AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 40204/2014:
BETWEEN:
SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE VENKATAREDDY RESIDING AT KEMPAPURA H.A FARM POST,
84
BANGALORE-560024 (SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED). ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-5600020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEX-D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.40379/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI K. S. RAMANATHAN SON OF K.A.SHIVARAMA KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.Y-2, EVERSHINE APARTMENTS, NO.134, NHCS LAYOUT,
85
3RD STAGE, 4TH BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560079 2. MR.NAYEEN BASHA SON OF ABDUL MUTHALIB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDNIG AT NO.323, HBR LAYOUT, 8TH CROSS, NEAR WISDOM SCHOOL, YASEEN NAGAR, BANGALORE-560043. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 2. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-56 0020. 3. THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANN-A, DATED 18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THEEYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANN-A AND ETC.
86
IN W.P. NO. 41394/2014: BETWEEN: 1. A SHEELA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN 2. A. KAVITHA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN 3. A. HAVILA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, D/O P. ARJUNAN ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.40, GEETHA MANDIR ROAD, 1ST CROSS, J.C. NAGAR, (M.R. PALYAM), BANGALORE-560 006.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-1 BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3)
87
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 09.04.2014 VIDE ANNX-G ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 41422/2014: BETWEEN: SRI S. MUNEGOWDA S/O LATE SONNAMARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANALORE-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN-B AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F PASSED BY THE R-1 AND 2 IN SO FAR AS THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.33/1 OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
88
TALUK MEASURING 3 ACRES 10 GUNTAS AND DELETE THE SAME FROM THE ACQUISITION AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 41427/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O R NARAYANAGOWDA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560026
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-1 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1, DATED 18.06.2013, WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-D AND ETC.
89
IN W.P. NO. 41428/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.KEMPAMMA W/O LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SRI K. C. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. SRI KESHAVKUMAR S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI K MURTHY S/O LATE P.KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. SMT NAGAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 6. SRI PRAKASH S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 7 . SRI K SHANKAR S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 8 . SRI JAYARAM S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 9 . SRI C. K. MANJUNATH S/O LATE CHIKKAKEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK- 560 038. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
90
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE, BY ITS COMMISSIONER-560 001 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-
D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 41858/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT ASHWATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, W/O LATE G. RAMAIAH, RESIDING AT NO.15, MARUTHI NILAYA, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
(SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2. SMT. G.R. SHAILAJA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O M GOPALA KRISHNE GOWDA, R/AT NO.1, SY NO.27/3,
91
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F, DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS
HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER
TO ISSUE ANN-F THAN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT
ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 43815/2014:
BETWEEN:
MRS K. JAYASHREE W/O D. VIJAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 206
92
MARUTI LAYOUT HEBBALA, DASARA HALLI HA FORM PO BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P. N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT III FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER NO. 20, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE B.D.A. ACT ISSUED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEX-A) IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY IS CONCERNED BEING PROPERTY NO.206, CARVED OUT IN SY.NO.48/1 OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 43963/2014:
BETWEEN: 1. SRI KRISHNAPPA
93
S/O.LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI S. R. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. SRI S. R. MURTHY S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 4. SRI S. R. ANAND S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI-560064 BANGALORE NORTH(ADDITIONAL) TALUK-560064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KALYAN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BANGALORE-01 (BY ITS SECRETARY) 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-22. (REPTS. BY ITS COMMISIONER)
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-22.
94
4. THE UNDER SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE-01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. M.N. RAMAJANEJA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AS PER ANNEX-A TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS SERIAL NO.921 IN THE FINAL NOTIFICATION IS CONCERNED IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 44306/2014: BETWEEN: 1. LAKSHMANA G. S/O GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, NO.485, 6TH MAIN, 8TH MAIN, MICO COLONY, BTM 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE. 2. DR. SANJAY B PATIL S/O BABU GOWDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.204/B/3, 1ST FLOOR 6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CROSS 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE. 3. LINGARAJU B. S/O S. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO.204/B/3, I FLOOR, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 27TH CORSS,
3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE.
95
4. CHANDRASHEKAR N.R., S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.408, 22ND MAIN, 2ND STAGE, J.P.NAGAR, MYSORE. 5. THARANATHA SETTY I. S/O LATE SHESHA SHETTY, AGED 61 YEARS, HOTEL ANUPAMA, 5 & 6, TANK BUND ROAD, BANGALORE. 6. MUDDAMMA, W/O RAMASWAMY, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.59/544, "SAI SADANA", SANTHE BEEDHI, ANEKAL TOWN, BANGALORE. 7. JAYAMMA. D., Q/O D NARASHIMAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.6/1, N R ROAD, SBM OPP, ANEKAL TOWN, BANGALORE DISTRICT. 8. FAROOQ MUNNAWAR, W/O L.PEER MUNAVAR, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.16/21, GROUND FLOOR, I CROSS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, OLD GURUPPANA PALYA, BANGALORE. 9. SEETHA LAKSHMI R. W/O T. RAMAMURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT, MILLAR TANK BUND ROAD,
BANGALORE CANTONMENT, BANGALORE.
96
10. VASANTHI ASHOK, W/O ASOKAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.35, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT, VASANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE. 11. JAGADAMBA B.K. D/O BASAPPA, AGED 69 YEARS, NO.504/1, 4TH MAIN ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGAR, BANGALORE. 12. SUNDAR D.T., W/O DESH LINGA GOWDA, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.95, 3RD CROSS, BASAVESHWARANAGARA LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 13. RAMACHANDRAPPA B. S/O B. NANEPPA, AGED 74 YEARS, NO.39/1, 2ND MAIN, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE. 14. BAYAPPA REDDY Y., S/O LATE YARAPPA REDDY, AGED 75 YEARS, NO.354, 9TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE. 15. SUSEELA GOUD. M., W/O BASAVANA GOWDA M, AGED 63 YEARS, NO.48/A, 18TH A CROSS, 1ST MAIN, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR,
HEBBAL KUMPARA, BANGALORE.
97
16. BALARAM N., S/O LATE NARASHIMAIAH, AGED 64 YEARS, RAVI. NO.204/17, 4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 17. VIJAYENDRA K.V., S/O K.VEERAIAH, AGED 53 YEARS, RAIV NO.204/17, 4TH MAIN, GANGA NAGAR, BANGALORE. 18. ANSUYA N, W/O ANANATHAPADMANABHA, AGED 51 YEARS, NO.6, 19TH CROSS, RAMASWAMY LAYOUT, LALJI NAGAR, LAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE. 19. RAMACHANDRA U. S/O K.V. UGRAPPA, AGED 59 YEARS, NO.42, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 20. NAGAPPA U. V. S/O K.V. UGRAPPA, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.42, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 21. THIMMARAJ SETTY T.K. S/O T.V. KENCHARAYA SETTY, AGED 61 YEARS, NO.111/45, 5TH MAIN, OFFICIAL COLONY,
BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE. 22. SRIDHARAN A.C. AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
98
S/O A.C. CHANDRASHEKAR, NO.169, 9TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 23. BASAVARAJAIAH M.T. S/O LATE M. THIMMAIAH, AGED 69 YEARS, NO.2515, 9TH CROSS, S.S. PURAM, TUMKUR. 24. VISHALAKSHA KADIVAL, W/O PANDURANG ACHAR KADIVAL, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.265, 1ST BLOCK, 8TH CROSS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 25. NAGALAKSHMI S W/O KRISHNA MURTHY S, AGED 63 YEARS, NO.47, 5TH C MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 26. MALATHI, W/O GURURAJ WADYER, AGED 45 YEARS, NO.11, 14TH CROSS, KANAKANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 27. C.T.H. TAURO, S/O LATE C.M.TAURO, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.72, 5TH MAIN, 5TH CORSS, SRI KRISHNA GARDEN, R.R.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 059. 28. SRINIVAS K.E.,
S/O ESWARAPPA K.N., AGED 53 YEARS, NO.574, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL,
99
8TH B MAIN, B SECTOR, YALAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. 29. NANDINI K.V. KRISHNA PANI, AGED 34 YEARS, NO.X-104, ADARSHA APARTMENT, DEVARA BEESANAHALLI, BANGALORE. 30. PANKAJA RAMESHESHA, W/O M.R. RAMASHESHA, AGED 60 YEARS, NO.801, MELODY BLOCK, H.H.TAMBOURINE APARTMENTS, KANAKAPURA ROAD, J P NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. 31. VATSALAL MURTHY, W/O H.R.K. MURTHY, AGED 60 YEARS, D116, TOWN 2, BRIGADE PARMSPRINGS, 24TH MAIN, 7TH PHASE, J P NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078. 32. INDIRA, D/O ARUNACHALAM K, AGED 62 YEARS, NO.190, 9TH CROSS, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE. 33. SHYLAJA S W/O V. SHANKARANARAYANA, AGED 50 YEARS, NO.303, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK-02, SKYLINE CITY APARTMENTS, CHANDRA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI 1ST STAGE,
BANGALORE -560 072. 34. PRADEEP NAGARAJ, S/O H.R.NAGARAJA, AGED 56 YEARS,
100
NO.289, 11TH A CROSS, J P NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. 35. NAGA PRASAD K.V. S/O K.V. VENKATESHAIAH, AGED 37 YEARS, NO.603, RMZ APARTMETN, YALAHANKA, BANGALORE. 36. SRINIVAS K S/O ESHWARAPPA, K.N. AGED 53 YEARS, NO.574, GROUND FLOOR, NEAR NEW TOWN PUBLIC SCHOOL, 8TH MAIN, B-SECTOR, YALAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE. 37. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.12/3A, NANDA GOKULA, YAMUNABAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, VENKATESHAIAH K.V. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B.M.HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR P4, P8, P9, P11,P13,P14,P26,P29, P32 & P36; SRI. B. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR P1-3,5-7, 10,12,15-25, 27, 28, 30,31, 33 TO 35; V/O/DTD 09/02/17 PETITION DISMISSED AGAINST P37) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
101
BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
4. SMT. NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE GUNDU RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DOOR NO.22, 1ST FLOOR, BALAJI LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 042. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SMT. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-
M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44527/2014:
BETWEEN:
MR P.V.THOMAS PANICKER S/O SRI. GEE VARGHESE PANICKER AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT NO. 34, SHANTINAGAR PRESS ROAD TRIVENDRUM-695 001 KERALA. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA KESVY, ADVOCATE)
102
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. KESHAVA R AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED U/S 17(1) &(3) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY R-2 IN SO FAR AS THE
PETITIONERS LANDS ARE CONCERNED AS THE SAME IS NOT
REQUIRED FOR THE SCHEME OF THE BDA AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 44742/2014: BETWEEN: SMT NANJAMMA W/O N.SHAMANNA, D/O LATE N.NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, JAKKUR, JAKKUR VILLAGE, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE)
103
AND: 1. THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAND ACQUISITION T.CHOWDIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AT ANNX-K AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THEREOF IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS LAND DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREUNDER IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 44835/2014: BETWEEN:
SRI SRINIVAS J. S/O LATE K.V.JAIRAM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.326, 15TH CROSS,
104
SADASHIVANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 030.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMA BHAT K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER), KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU -560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. KESHAV R. AGNIHOTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, UNDER SEC.19(1) OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 ISSUED BY THE R-1, AT SERIAL NO. 896, PERTAINING TO LAND COMPRISED IN SY.NO.103/1, MEASURING 00 ACRES 36 GUNTAS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TQ. ISSUED BY THE R1, AS PER ANN-B AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 45486/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.N.RAVIKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O R. NARAYANAGOWDA, R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K. R. PURAM HOBLI,
105
BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560 030
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI N. B. CHANDRASHEKARIAH S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NIDUVANI VILLAGE, HALLI MYSORE HOBLI, HOLENARSIPUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-585 154. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX-H AND ETC.
106
IN W.P. NO. 46766/2014: BETWEEN: MRS.M.SHAMSHAD BEGUM W/O LATE K. SADIQ SAHEB AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.157-D ASWATH NAGAR, ALANKAR LAYOUT TANISANDRA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560 045. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE AND SRI. G. GANGIREDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING BANGALORE 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DELETE THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER FROM ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE NOTIFIED FOR THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATI LAYOUT, I.E., 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY. NO.14/1, IN FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 SITUATED IN THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ. BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04.07.2014 AS PER ANNX-B AND ETC.
107
IN W.P. NO. 47103/2014: BETWEEN: SMT JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O HANUMANTHAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI-560 023 BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47105/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT CHIKKAKAMAKKA
108
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, 2. SMT. KAMAKSHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O LATE HOODI MUNISWAMY, 3. SMT. A.P.PADMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, 4. MR. A.P.NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O LATE HOODI PILLAPPA, ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 0210, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
109
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47106/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT C. SAVITRAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM) 2. SRI. VASUDEVAMURTHY R S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 030
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
110
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47107/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O MADDURAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, ASHWATHKATTE ROAD, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
111
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNX-C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47608/2014: BETWEEN: SMT USHA S. RAO, W/O LATE SRI. SATHYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A 'MAHATE' NO. 169/1, 2ND MAIN B/W 3RD & 4TH CROSS CHAMRAJAPET BANGALORE-560 018
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
112
4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS ( BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4) (R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 20/10/2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT ( VIDE ANNX-K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS.45/5 & 45/6 IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND (PROPERTY) AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 47731/2014: BETWEEN: V. VENKATAMARI S/O LATE VENKATASHAMAPPA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/O 297, MARAPPA LAYOUT, S.R.K NAGAR (P.O) BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
113
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATIONS VIDE ANN-D DATED 03.02.2003 AND ANN-F
DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATED TO 1.37 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.72/2 OF
THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 47821/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD SHIVARAMAKARANATH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560077 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SMT PADMAVATHI N D/O SMT RATHNAMMA W/O SRI HARISHA V AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD
114
SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNTAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-H IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 47860/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT K V VEENAMMA
W/O KRSIHNAPPA M AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.86 BHAGYA LAKSHMI TRADERS ANJINEYA TEMPLE STREET
115
YOGESHWARANAGAR ROAD HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 560 024 2. SRI INDER SINGH S/O LATE P ESWAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEAS R/AT NO.8, 1ST CROSS MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24 3. SHASHI SINHA S/O RAM BABU SINGH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.14 MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24 4. M. RAMAKRSIHNA S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.1, 1ST MAIN MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24 5. SUSHMA SHARMA S/O SOHAN SHARMA AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT NO.5, S MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24
6. S ANJALIDEVI D/O LATE SREERAMULU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.4, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24
7. SRI NAVEEN LAL SHAH S/O LATE S.L. SHAH R/AT NO.6
116
1ST MAIN MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE - 24
8. SRI PRAKASHAPPA S/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.36, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS
MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE 24
9. NINGAPPA A P S/O PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.53/1, SSA ROAD 4TH MAIN, HEBBAL BANGALORE- 24
10. K NARASIMHALU S/O K OBAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.56 NAGAIAH BUILDING 1OTH CROSS KALANAGAR KAMMAGONDANAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 015. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. L. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560001 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE 20 R/P BY ITS COMMISSIONER
117
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE 20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY. NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 U/S 17(1) & (3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, UNDER PRLY. NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 & THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AT ANN-A & ANN-B PASSED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER IN SITUATED IN KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ. BANGALORE IS CONCERNED AND ETC IN W.P. NO. 47913/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MOHAMMED MOIEZULLA S/O SRI MOHAMMED MUSTAFA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A NO.3, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 2. SRI MOHAMMED ALTAF AHMED S/O MOHAMMED NASIR AHMED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.16, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 3. SRI B VARALASKHMI W/O SRI DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
4. SHRI PAVAN KUMAR S/O SRI DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS SL.NO. 3 & 4 R/A NO.17,
118
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 5. SRI B S MURULI S/O SRI M SRIRAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.14, 2ND MAIN ROAD 2ND CROSS, CHANAL ROAD MAGADI ROAD CHOLURALYA BANGALORE-560026 6. SMT T NAZIRA BANU W/O ANEEZ PASHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/A NO.25, "E" NO.4TH STREET BROADWAY ROAD CROSS BANGALORE-560051 7. SRI SHAIK YARAB S/O MR NAWAB SHARIEFF AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A NO.23, NARAYANASWAMY COMPOUND 2ND CROSS, SONNAPA GARDEN DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI BANGALORE-560045 8. SMT SYEDA UMERA W/O SRI SYED RAFIQ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/A NO.47, 48, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE SARAI PALYA, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE-560077 9. SRI ATAULLA S/O IBRAHIM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032
10. SIR FAIROZ KHAN S/O RAHMAN KHAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.483, DODDANNA NAGAR
119
K B SANDRA, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032 11. SMT HAJIRA BI W/O SRI SYED MAROOF AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.64, 2ND CROSS, BEHIND P & T QUARTERS KHB MAIN ROAD RANKANAGAR, R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032 12. SMT MUMTAZ UNNISA W/O ASHIAQ AHMED GHOUN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A 92, 5TH CROSS KAUSERNAGAR, R T NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 13. SRI ASAD JAMAL S/O SRI ABDUL KHAYUM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 14. SRI KURSHID ALAM S/O ASAD JAMAL AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS SL.NO.13 & 14 ARE R/A NO.8/2, 1ST CROSS BEHIND GOVT KANNADA SCHOOL PADARAYANAPURA BANGALORE-560026 15. SRI G RAMESH KUMAR S/O SR. M GANGANNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A NO.16, 2ND CROSS N K PALYA, SHIVAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560051 16. SMT AZHAR JABEEN W/O SYED MOHAMMED SHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/A HOUSE NO.52 COOKS ROAD, A THIMMAIAH ROAD CROSS BHARATHI NAGAR BANGALORE-560001
120
17. SRI RAHEEM BAIG S/O ABBAS BAIG AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/A NO.124/97, 4TH MAIN ROAD NEW GURUPPAN PALYA BANNERGHATTA MAIN RAOD BANGALORE-560029 18. SRI MUNEER JAN S/O ABDUL AZEEZ AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A E-127 NEW NO.22/9B, RING ROAD NORTH SIDE NAGAWARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST BANGALORE-560045 19. SMT FAREEDA BANU W/O SRI SAMIULLAKHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A NO.1479 RAMA TEMPLE STREET VINAYAKA STREET, IIND CROSS VENKATESPURAM BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560002 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
121
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN
PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED U/SEC. 17(1) OF THE
BDA ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2203 VIDE ANN-A & NOTIFICATION
ISSUED/U/SEC. 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN-B ISSUED BY THE R2 HAS LAPSED IS ABANDONED IN SO
FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED.
IN W.P. NO. 48577/2014: BETWEEN: SMT VIJAYALAXMI W/O N PANDU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A #167/167-A, 2ND CROSS DEEPIKA LAYOUT CHELLAKERE BANGALORE-560043
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-01 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560001
3. THE ADDL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560001
122
…RESPONDENTS ( BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2 ANNX-H AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2204, PASSED BY R-1, ANNX-J AND CONSEQUENTIAL AWARD AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 48880/2014: BETWEEN: V. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUTHUR VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE-01 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20.
….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE AND SRI.A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
123
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2010 PASSED BY THE R-2 AND 3 REJECTING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 5 1/4TH GUNTAS OF THE LAND VIDE ANN-F AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.49567/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA 2. SRI. JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O. LATE CHOWDAPPA
BOTH RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE -560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 0020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
124
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE II FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DTD.18.6.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-H. IN W.P. NO.50260/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.SHANMUGUM S/O.M.MURGAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.43/1, "SRIRAMPURA ROAD, 18TH CROSS, AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE-94
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE-1 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
125
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATIOND ATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S LAND IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN-A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.50533/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.B.G.GIRIJA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND W/O. CHENNAKESHAVA, R/AT BIDARAGUPPE VILLAGE AND POST, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 2. SMT. B.G.MANJULA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O. LATE GOVINDASWAMY AND W/O. S.GOPAL R/AT NO.124, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTHA NAGARA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMEBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
126
AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS
RELATING TO ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS OF PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION ANNEX-F FINAL NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEX-G.
IN W.P. NO.51294/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. CHANNAMMA AGEDA BOUT 60 YEARS W/O. LATE KEMPANNA, R/AT THANISANDRA DR.SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
127
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 4. MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY S/O. THIRUPUL REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 5. SMT. MUNIREDDY SAMPORNAM W/O.SRI.MADDIREDDY SREERAMULA REDDY, AGEDA BOUT 53 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 R/AT NO.75, 3RD MAIN, AMARYA JOTHYI LAYOUT CHOLANAGAR, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032
6. SMT.GEETHA BHAVANI W/O. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 7. SRI.T.V.V.PRASAD S/O.SRI.CHENNAKESHAVALU NAIDU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT.53, 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN, DENA BANK COLONY, GANGOR, BANGALORE-32 8. K.N.VISHWANATH S/O.KADIDA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT KADIADAL HAROGALIAGE POST, TIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIMOGGA-577 411 9. SRI.ANANDA BABU S/O. D.A.NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.15/'A', 16/'A', 13TH CROSS, BESHWANAGAR, MARTHI LAYOUT, DASARHALLI, BANGALORE-24
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
128
SRI. B.V. RAMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R7; SRI. M.K. SRIPATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R8; SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R6-R8; SRI. P. RAJESHWARA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S. VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE FOR R9) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANN-C AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.51930/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O.LATE NARASAPPA, R/AT SAMIPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O.T.V.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD, I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE-85
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
129
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D.
IN W.P. NO.51931/2014: BETWEEN: SMT.KANTAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.T.K.SUDHINDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O.T.V.KRSIHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.22, NEW BEL ROAD,
I.T.I. LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 71 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
130
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-D ISSUED BY THE R-1 TO 3 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.51932/2014:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA 2. ANANDAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA 3. SRI.RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA
R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.B.L.NARENDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O.C.V.LAKSHMI NARAYAN SHASTRI R/AT NO.29/1, 9TH CROSS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE-80
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
131
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEX-
E.
IN W.P. NO.52760/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.NARAYANAPPA S/O. LATE CHANNARARAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA, II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064
2. SRI.C.JAYARAM S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRs
132
a) SMT.BHAGYA W/O.LATE C.JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS b) SRI.KIRAN S/O.LATE C. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS c) SRI.KISHORE S/O.LATE C.JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
PETITIONERS 2(a) TO 2(c) ARE R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064
3. SRI.C.SUBBANNA S/O.LATE CHANNARAYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs (a) SMT.MUNITHAYAMMA W/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT, HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064 (b) SMT.SUJATHA D/O.LATE C. SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS (c) SMT.VEENA D/O. LATE C.SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAMALINGARAJU
3(b) AND 3(c) BOTH ARE
R/AT DEVASHETTIHALLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT
133
(d) SMT.REKHA D/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA W/O.SRI.RAGHU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.390, II CROSS, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 094 (e) SRI.KESHAVA S/O. LATE C. SUBBANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.211, DURGA NILAYA, II MAIN, NEAR JAKKUR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.R. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.14, ISSUED BY THE R1, AT ANN-D,
134
IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO ACQUIRING THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER. IN W.P. NO.53854/2014: BETWEEN: SRI.MUNISHYAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O.LATE DANDU CHIKKANNA, R/AT NO.261, I MAIN, 2ND CROSS, DASARAHALLI, H.A.FARM POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 024 SINCE DEAD BY LRs 1(a) SMT.GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, D/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT THAVATAHALLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 1(b) SRI.D.M.GOWDARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O.LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560 024 1(c) SRI.D.M.CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. LATE MUNISHYAMAPPA R/AT KEMPEGOWDA MAIN ROAD, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560 024. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHENNARAYA REDDY S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING,
135
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE MODIFIED
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.14 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER
ANNEX-Q AND CONSEQUENTLY HOLD THAT PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION ISSUED DTD. 3.2.2003 AS PER ANNEX-N AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.23.2.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS PER
ANNEX-P DOES NOT SURVIVE.
IN W.P. NO.54059/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS W/O.DODDABYRAPPA 2. SRI.RAMAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE DODDABYRAPPA 3. SRI.ANANDMURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O. LATE DODDABYRAPPA
136
ALL ARE RESIDING AT SMAPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-98 REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR.B.L.NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O.C.V.LAKSHMINARAYANA SHASTRY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.29/A, 9TH CROSS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 080. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DTD.18.6.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R-1 TO
R-3.
137
IN W.P.NO.54083/2014: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. REPESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LANDS IN SURVEY NOS.11 AND 14 OF
VENKATESHAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER NAT SL.NOS. 1037 AND 1040 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
138
IN W.P.NO.54236/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI MUNIRAJU, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SRI BACHE GOWDA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 4. SRI ANJANAPPA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 5. SRI T. BAIRE GOWDA, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
T CHOWDAIAIH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRSENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
139
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE, DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEX-F), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 1 GUNTA IN SURVEY NO.27/4 OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELANHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE PROPERTY) AT SL.NO.974 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54358/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SATHYANARAYANA S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. S. MUKUNDA RAO S/O SHANKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 RISIDING A/T RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGLAORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. SONNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS,
140
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALROE-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SAID IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-D BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54725/2014: BETWEEN: SMT S. SUJATHA W/O SRI. S. V. GANESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.8, ROGERS ROAD, RICHARDS TOWN, (C. V. RAMAN NAGAR) BANGALORE-560 005.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001
141
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN
THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1
UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E., ANNEX-P, IN SO
FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER IN
SY.NO.30/6 & 30/7, K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM
HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, MEASURING 22 GUNTAS
AND 26 GUNTAS RESPECTIVELY.
IN W.P.NO.55081/2014: BETWEEN:
MR N. R. VENKATESHMURTHY S/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.5, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE)
142
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-H AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55082/2014: BETWEEN: MR. R. MUNIRAJU S/O SRI RAMAKRISHANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &
143
URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGLORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55083/2014: BETWEEN: MR N. R. SRINIVASAPPA SRI. RAMAKRISHANPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, THANISANDRA VILLAGE @ SARAYAPALYA, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. R. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,
144
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGLORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55436/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI R. VENKATARAMAN S/O SRI. M. RAJENDRAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NO.45, JAYALAKSHMI NILAYA, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT, "VIDHYASAGAR",SARAI PALYA,
THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560 077. 2. SRI. N.D. NAGARAJ S/O SRI. N.D. NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.35 & 36, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT, "VIDHYASAGAR", SARAI PALYA, THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560 077.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE )
145
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020. REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN - K AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - M ISSUED BY R-2
& 1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55671/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI G. J. LAKSHMIPATHY S/O LATE JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, VENKATASWAMAPPA LAYOUT, MUNIPUVANNA COMPOUND, MANORAYANAPALYA, R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032
146
2. SRI G. R. NARAYANA SWAMY S/O LATE G. A. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT GORAMODAGU VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN : 562 105 3. SRI. ABDUL LATIF S/O BABA JAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, MASJID COMPLEX, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560 045 4. SMT. LINGAMMA W/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.51,2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS,DINNUR,R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 5. MRS A. DYANA D/O H. AROKYARAJ, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO.19/3, 6TH CROSS,BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 6. SRI D. SAMSON S/O A. DEVAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.4,3RD CROSS, NANJAPPA GARDEN, BABUSABPALYA,
KALYANNAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043
147
7. MR M. KHADER PASHA S/O LATE MOHAMMED SARVAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.15, NEAR VIVEKANANDA ENGLISH SCHOOL, MARUTHI SAW MILL CROSS ROAD, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, DR S.R.K. NAGAR POST, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 077 8. SRI CHIKKANNA S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 9. SRI. HONNAPPA S/O LATE BAJJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.8 AND 9 ARE R/AT NO.125, BABU REDDY COMPOUND, MANORAYANAPALYA, BANGALORE-560 032 10. MR. S. ANWAR S/O SYED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.722, 2ND MAIN, BHARATHNAGAR, NEAR PIPE FACTORY, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 077 11. SRI M. RAMESH S/O K MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/T NO.73, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, SHIVA TEMPLE STREET, BANGALORE-560 045
12. MR. MOHAMMED KHALEEL S/O MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.17,
148
DASAPPA GARDEN, NEAR HMT LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 13. MRS WAHEEIDA BANU W/O MOHAMMED ISHAQ, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO 8/3, 20TH CROSS,VIVIYANI ROAD, SAGAYAPURAM, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005 14 . SRI S. MURUGAN S/O SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.25/35, RMV SECOND STAGE, BOOPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560 094 15. MR SYED JAMEEL S/O SYED PEER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.69, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032 16. SRI C. SRINIVASALU S/O LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.994, S. N. HALLI, B. NANJAPPA LAYOUT, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
149
M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 AT ANN-S, DT. 18.06.2014, AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL & THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW & PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANN - S AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56203/2014:
BETWEEN:
SRI. GOPAL S/O LATE BASAVAPUJARI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.10, 2ND CROSS, KIRLOSKAR FOUNDRY,
OPP TO ISKON TEMPLE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE-22.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. N. SURESH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE)
150
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 08.10.2013, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANN - H TO THE W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56300/2014: BETWEEN: MR K. V. THOMAS S/O LATE VARKEY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.222 2ND A CROSS, 1ST STAGE 2ND BLOCK HBR LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRA SHEKAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE- 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
151
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERNED VIDE ANN - E AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56350/2014: BETWEEN: SMT MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/O SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
152
NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. UDD/426/MNJ/2011, BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R1 (ANNEXURE-E), IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 6 GUNTAS IN SURVEY NO. 6/5B OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, (SCHEDULE PROPERTY) AT SL.NO.934 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56646/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI DODDAKALLAPPA S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 2. SRI A. G. SRINIVASAMURTHY S/O LATE DODDACHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHA HALLI SAHAKARANAGAR POST BANGALORE-560092
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
153
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, A.G.A FOR R-1) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-E), IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE LANDS TO AN EXTENT OF 14 GUNTAS (OUT OF
TOTAL EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 34 GUNTAS) IN SY.NO.43/2 AND TO
AN EXTENT OF 24 GUNTAS (OUT OF TOTAL EXTENT OF 3 ACRES
1 GUNTA) IN SY.NO.44/2 OF AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BELONGING TO
THE PETITIONERS AT SL.NOS.630 AND 632 OF THE SCHEDULE
APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND
GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56748/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI N. SHIVRAJ S/O NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, B-39, AIR STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 064 2. SRI G. BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE SRI ANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SPT AIR STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 3. SRI SIDDARAMAPPA S/O MALLESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SPT, ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064
154
4. SRI A. MARY JULIANA D/O ANTHU DAS, B-5, ALL INDIA RADIO STAFF QUARTERS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560094 5. SRI R. MANJUNATH S/O LATE RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, B-36,SPT AIR STAFF QUARTERS, ALL INDIA RADIO YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 6. SMT. R. AMUDHA DEVI W/O G.B BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.146, RISALDAR STREET, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE 560020 7. SRI V.S. RAMESH S/O V.N. SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO. 60-B, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 8. SRI S. RAVINDRA RAO S/O LATE M. SUBRAMANI RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, B-11, SPT ALL INDIA RADIO QUARTERS, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560064 9. SMT. SHAKUNTHALA S/O SRI RACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO.72, 5TH MAIN, VASANTH NAGAR, HIGH GROUNDS,
BANGALORE 10. SMT.D. NAGARATHNA W/O SRI M.C. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 34, 1ST MAIN, GANGAPPA BLOCK,
155
GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032
11. SRI K.B. GIRISH S/O BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.11, WHITE HOUSE, 13TH CROSS, KAVERI LAYOUT, GM PLAYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE - 560075
12. SRI M. GOPINATH S/O C. MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO U 454, 6TH CROSS, MSR NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560054 13. SMT. T. KALAVATHY W/O RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.17, PANCHAVATI LAYOUT,
2ND PHASE, SARAIPALYA, THANISANDRA, VIDYA SAGAR, BANGALORE. 14. SRI S. VENI W/O S RAVICHANDAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO. 1288, B BLOCK, VIJANAPUR, DOORAVANI NAGAR, BANGALORE 15. SRI B. GUNASHEKAR
S/O LATE BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.14, 6TH CROSS, SOCIETY STREET, SWATANTRA NAGAR, SRIRAMAPURAM, BANGALORE - 560021
16. SMT.K.C. RAMANI W/O LATE K.P RAGHAVAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO. 356, SAI KRUPA LAKSHMI
156
8TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, IISC LAYOUT, JRD TATA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560092 17. SRI PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY S/O GANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO BTM 2795 KOLAR MAIN ROAD, BANGARPET 18. SRI RAJAGOPALA REDDY S/O GANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO BTM 2795 KOLAR MAIN ROAD, BANGARPET 19. SRI EZHIL VENU S/O S. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO. 83, 9TH CROSS, KARAMCHAND LAYOUT, LINGARAJPURAM, BANGALORE 20. MRS. K. RAMANI W/O SRI K.N. SHANKARANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, A TYPE, NO.160, BEML QUARTERS BEML NAGAR PO KGF 21. SRI S.M. THYAGARAJA S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO 32/2, 2ND B MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560020 22. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR
S/O ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BULLHALLI, HAROHALLI POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE
157
23. SRI B.V. GANGADHAR S/O VENKATA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS MRS. B.S. BABY KALA, W/O SRI B.V GANGADHAR, NO.2, ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, JC NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560006 24. SMT. MANIK BAI W/O GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, A TYPE, NO.14, BEML QUARATERS, KGF 25. SRI S SATHISH S/O SRI SATHYANARAYANA SETTY Y AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 141/A, NAKSHA"S, 3RD MAIN, 2ND STAGE, AGB LAYOUT, SARASWATHIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560086 26. SMT. ANITHA W/O SHAMU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO 195, A TYPE, BEML NAGAR POST, KGF 27. SRI. GAJENDRA KUMAR S/O NAGAPPA ROJED, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO. 129, A TYPE, BEML QUARTERS, BEML NAGAR POST, KGF 28. SRI. RAMADAS AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
NO 8, 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, CHEWADAPPA LAYOUT, K NARAYANAPURA ROAD, HEGDE NAGAR, BANGALORE 560077
158
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H R ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADV) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560020 REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - L AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION PASSED DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - N
ISSUED BY R-1 AND R-2 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57076/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMESH HERALE S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
159
2. SRI GANESH HERALE S/O SRI NAGAPPA HERALE AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3. SRI UMESH HERALE S/O SRI LATE NAGAPPA HERALE, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS ALL ARE R/O RACHENAHALLI SHAVARAMA KARANTH LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMETN, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K. P. WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - E THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT LAND IN SURVEY NO. 105/2B [I ACRE 12 GUNTAS] OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
160
IN W.P.NO.57117/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR SUBBANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. MR.CHIKKASUBBANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. MR.NARASIMHA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. MR.RAJANNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 5. MR.HANUMANTHA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 6. MR.MUNIRAJU S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF AMRUTHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 094.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE FOR P1, 2, 5 & 6) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
161
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMNT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - D THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT
LAND IN SURVEY NO. 55/[15 GUNTAS], 47/7 [01 ACRE 32
GUNTAS], 53/3 [01 ACRE 32 GUNTAS], 53/2 [14 GUNTAS], 54[15
GUNTAS] OF LANDS IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM
HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57150/2014: BETWEEN: SMT JEEVANAMMA W/O SRI CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/A SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. SHETTY, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.K. SRIVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING
162
BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LAND ACQUISITION PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS WELL AS FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PROPOSING THE ACQUISITION OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.40/1 MEASURING 5 GUNTAS OUT OF 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS SITUATED AT SRIRAMPURAM VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TQ., BANGALORE DIST., BELONGS TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN VIDE ANNX-H & K BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57605/2014: BETWEEN: MRS KANTHAMMA W/O SRI V. NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE HEBBAL, BANGALORE - 560024
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D.,
SRI. RAJASHEKAR B KANAVI, SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATES)
163
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE -560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -C THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS
THE SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 54 (0 ACRE 23 GUNTAS) OF LAND IN DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57606/2014: BETWEEN: 1. MR. A. G. RAMAKRISHNA S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. MR. A. G. RAGHURAMAIAH
S/O GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE,
164
B.B. ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 092.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE AND SRI.CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX - C THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECTION LAND IN SY. NO. 47/4 (1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS) OF LAND IN AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 58859/2014
BETWEEN: GOVINDARAJU
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE THIMMAIAH, RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHNKA HOBLI,
165
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTIY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. M.S. SURYANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANN-F DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER TO ISSUE ANN-F, THEN TO DECLARE THAT, DECLARATION AT ANN-H DATED 23.02.2004 CEASES TO EXISTS AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 59794/2014
BETWEEN: SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE JAKKUR POST
166
YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONER BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - C AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 60012/2014
BETWEEN:
SRI RAMAIAH S/O LATE MUTHURAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1308 RAMAIAH GARDEN VIDYASAGARA, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD DR. SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
167
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE ENDORSEMENT DROPPING THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.84/7 MEASURING 10 GUNTAS SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK IN TERMS OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 26.10.2011 AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 622/2015 BETWEEN: SMT CHANNAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE
K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560018
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND
168
SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.A. ARIGA , ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. FILED IS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 685/2015
BETWEEN: M. RAJAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE V MUNIVENKATAPPA RESIDING AT NO. 733 PATEL MUNIVENKATAPPA LAYOUT NAGARAVA
BANGALORE-560045 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND
169
SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 1958/2015
BETWEEN: SMT. P. SHYLAJA W/O LATE SRI. T.A. RENUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.43, 1ST FLOOR, PAPANNA BLOCK, 13TH CORSS, RBI MAIN COLONY ROAD,
GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. S. SHASHIBHUSHAN, ADVOCATE)
170
AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE )
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DIRECT THE RESPONDENT /BDA TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S PLIGHT AND TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION BY ALLOTTING AN EQUIVALENT SITE OF THE SAME DEMENSIONS IN THE SAME WITHOUT ANY EXTRA COST AND EXECUTE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN THIS BEHALF WITHIN 7 DAYS AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 2462/2015
BETWEEN: SRI SARDAR AHMED SON OF SRI.K.ABDUL RAHIM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT 23, NANDI VIEW LAYOUT, DINNUR MAIN ROAD, R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
171
(LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AS PER ANNX - E AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AS PER ANNX - F IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY; AWARD DATED 08.07.2004 AND AWARD DATED 18.10.2004 AS PER ANNX - G & H; THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS DATED 06.11.2004 AS PER ANNX - J & K RESPECTIVELY BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 4591/2015
BETWEEN: 1. GOVINDAMMA W/O MR RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. SRINIVAS S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. NAGRAJ S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
4. CHANDRU S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
172
5. YASHODAMMA D/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. VENKATESH S/O MR. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL RESIDING AT NO.80, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-77 AND ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER G. SHANTARAJ S/O LATE B. N. GURUMURTHY REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.161, 8TH STREET, BANK AVENUE, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-43.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE FOR P2 - P6 ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001, BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUHTORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
173
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL ALONG WITH SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX - L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO. 5228/2015
BETWEEN: MR.P.V.CHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE P V MADHAVAN RESIDING AT #141, BLOCK NO.20 (FORMED IN SURVEY NO.17/1 HENNUR VILLAGE) ARKAVATHI BDA LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION T CHOWDAIAH ROAD K. P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R. T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R T NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032
174
5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ALLEGED DENOTIFICATION PROCESS OF R-1 DENOTIFYING ESPECIALLY THE PETITIONER PROPERTY MORE FULLY EVIDENT IN ANNX - L DATED 12.11.2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 5664/2015
BETWEEN: 1. SMT BATHULA BEGUM W/O JANAB NUSARATH PASHA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SRI. JANAB NUSRATH PASHA S/O ALIJANABSATTARALIAS BABASAHIB, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.63, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 045, ALSO RESIDING AT NO.405,
406, NEEKADRI MAHAL APARTMENTS BLOCK, NO.45/6, NANDIDURGA ROAD, BANGALORE.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. SURESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SRIDHARA D. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001, REPT. BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
175
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BDA, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PRAK WEST, BANGALORE-20.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS DATED
15.11.2014 FOR DE-NOTIFICATION OR RE-CONVEYANCE OF THE
PETITIONERS LAND AS PER VIDE ANNX - A & A1 & B TO THIS
WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 6735/2015
BETWEEN: SRI GURUPADAPPA NAGAMARPALLI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE SANGANBASAPPA NAGAMARPALLI R/AT NO. 322, SARASWATHI NILAY 3RD MAIN, 5TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
176
URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 6981/2015
BETWEEN: 1. MRS.KUNJAMMA SAMUEL W/O LATE A J SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. MRS. LENY ROY, D/O LATE A J SAMUEL, W/O MR. ROY PHILIP, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.JOSEPH ABRAHAM, S/O MR.ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.306, 7M, 80 FT, ROAD,
177
HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-0560 020.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVLEOPMENT AUTHOIRTY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M. N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS QUASHING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & R-3 AS PER ANNEX - G FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3 VIDE ANNEX-H AND MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 & 3 VIDE ANNEX - J, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND DECLARE THAT THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - G, H & J HAVE LAPSED AND HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN VIEW OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT NO. 30 OF 2013).
178
IN W.P. NO.7248/2015:
BETWEEN: SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR RAJANNA B. O/AT NO.402, JAGNANESHWARI NILAYA, 9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASRAHALLI HEBBAL, BANGALORE-24.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.N. PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX
- J AND ETC.
179
IN W.P. NO. 7277/2015,
BETWEEN: SRI. MARUTHI BADAVANE NAGAREEKA KSHEMABHIVRUDHI SAMITHI REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. RAJANNA - B. O/AT NO.402, JAGANANESHWARI NILAYA 9TH CROSS, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-24
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE-01 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - K AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 7326/2015,
BETWEEN:
SRI. INNESHAPPA
180
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWRAPPA R/AT MESTRI PALYA HAMLET VILLAGE, RACHENAHALLI, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JUANNES @ JOHN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SON OF LATE Y. CHINNAPPA, RESIDING AT #41, SAI KRUPA APARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, VISHWANATHA NAGENAHALLI, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPEMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
181
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.8277/2015:
BETWEEN: MRS. JETHRONICA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS W/O MR. GABRIEL R/AT NO.89, N.M. REDDY ROAD, MARIYANAPALYA H.A. FARM POST BANGALORE - 560 024. ...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, ADVOCATE )
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
182
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY R1 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.8278/2015:
BETWEEN: 1. SMT AROKIA MARY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE ALPHONSE RAJ R/AT NO. 138, GARE CHINNAPPA LAYOUT, MARIYANPALAYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.
2. SRI. C. ANTHONYSWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE CHINNAPPA R/AT MARIYANAPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.
3. SRI. A. CHINNAPPA
S/O AROGYAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.
4. SRI. K. VENKATESHAPPA S/O T.K. KODANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.
5. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA
W/O LATE LAWRENCE AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MARIYANPALYA, H.A. FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE )
183
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-E ISSUED BY THE
R-1 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND IN
RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
IN W.P. NO.9135/2015:
BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SYED ZAKRI HUSSAIN
S/O S. RAHAMATUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.9/562, AGADI STREET, AMEENPEER ROAD
CUDDAPAH - 516 001.
2. K.S. DILSHAD BEGUM W/O K.S. RAFIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.12, 2ND MAIN BYRAPPA
184
LAYOUT, NEAR RASHEEDYA MASJID, GOVINDAPURA, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.
3. SRI N.K. RAM MOHAN S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NEHA NILAYA, NO.13 SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT, KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.
4. SRI. S. JAI PRASAD
S/O LATE M. SIVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.439, 5TH "B" MAIN, 2ND BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 043.
5. SRI G. CHANDRACHAR
S/O T.H. GANGADHARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.13,NEHA NILAYA, SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT, KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.
6. SMT. LALITHA BAI
W/O A. VEERA RAGHAVALU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, 4TH CROSS, I FLOOR, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023.
7. SRI RAVINDRA BABY
S/O S. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.814, 10TH "A" AMIN, INDIRA NAGARA, I STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 038.
185
8. SRI A. RIZAUDEEN S/O ASHRAF ALI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, DEFENCY LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077.
9. SRI R.SARAMA BEGUM W/O A. RIAZUDEEN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.12,DEFENCY LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BHARAT NAGAR, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077.
10. SRI C. KALINGAIAH
S/O CHAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 247, 12 "A" CROSS, 1ST "B" MAIN ROAD, W.C ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMI PURAM POST, BENGALURU - 560 086.
11. SRI G. SURENDRANATH
S/O LATE K. GOPALA PILLAI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.B-15, KHB LAY OUT, PUTTENAHALLI, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064.
12. SMT. M. VIJAYA KUAMRI
W/O M. DHANA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.48, 2ND MAIN, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 047.
13. SMT. E. KAMALA MANOGARAN W/O MANOGARAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO 2 FRIENDS LAYOUT, CHANNAPPANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
186
MARATHAHALLI POST, BENGALURU - 560 037.
14. SMT. MADHURI ADIGA
W/O A.R ASHOK KUMAR ADIGA, AGED ABOUT 48 YFEARS, R/AT NO.288, 3RD "A" CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, W.O.C ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.
15. SMT. V.S. AMARAVENMATHY W/O R. RAMAN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/1 DEFENCE LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
16. SRI SYED AHMED
S/O NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
17. SRI NAVEED AHMED S/O NISAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.21/2, DEFENCY LAYOUT, 3RD CROSS, THANSANDAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
18. SRI. S KUMAR
S/O LATE SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.45, 2ND CROSS, SRI SAIBABA NAGAR SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU - 560 021.
19. SRI K KOTHANDARAMAN
S/O V KANNIPPAN AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.NEW NO.38, OLD NO.245 9TH MAIN, MATHIKERE NEW EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 054.
187
20. TAJA PASHA
S/O LAND CHAND PASHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT, NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.
21. SMT SEEMA BANU
W/O TAJ PASHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.23/106/B, 2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS, KUPPASWAMY LAYOUT NAGAVARA ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.
22. SMT SHANAZ BEGUM
W/O ZAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.58 YEARS, GOVINDAPURA, UMARNAGAR, 4THCROSS, A.C. POST, BENGALURU - 560 045.
23. SMT ZAKIRA BEGUM
W/O LATE JAMSHEED AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.25 3RD CROSS, DEFENCY LAYOUT, NEAR FATHIMA MAJID THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
24. SRI S KRISHNA MURTHY
S/O LATE S SINGARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.3/1, MES QUARTERS, GANGADHARA CHETTY ROAD, SHIVAN CHETTY GARDEN POST, BENGALURU - 560 042.
25. SRI M MAHBOOB ALI
S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSONROAD,
188
FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
26. SRI M AKBER ALI S/O LATE V M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
27. SRI YOUSUF ALI S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
28. SRI EQBAL ALI S/O LATE T M MOHAMMED ALI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B TYPE, ROPERTSON ROAD, FRASER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
29. SMT YASMEEN SULTANA
W/O AKHI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
30. SRI MOHAMMED ABDULLA
W/O S HAMIM AHMED AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
31. SRI MOHAMMED ZEYAULLA
W/O S HAMIM AHMED, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.32, 3RD CROSS
189
DEFENCY LAYOUT, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 077.
32. SRI. R KANICKRAJ
W/O S RAJENDIRAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.1 TERESA 2ND CROSS, RANGANATHA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 048.
33. SRI. K.M.M. ABDUL KADAR
W/O K MOIDIN BEARY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.103, MANASABA PALACE, SULTANPALYA MAIN ROAD, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 032.
34. SRI. BONDU RAMA SWAMY
W/O MUSALAIAH, AGED ABOUT... YEARS, R/AT N.306, 9TH C MAIN, I CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 046.
35. SRI. I KUMARAN MOOSAD
S/O I RAMAN MOOSAD, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.91, G BLOCK, SAHAKARA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 092.
36. SRI N K GOPI
S/O N.S. KRISHNACHARI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, NEHA NILAYA, SONNE GOWDA LAYOUT,
KODEGIHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.
190
37. SRI. A SUBRAMANYAM S/O A SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.33, OFFICERS QUARTERS, BEML NAGAR POST, K.G.F. - 563 115
38. SRI FAIROZ BAIG S/O LATE AMEERJAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.33, 1ST CROSS D.V. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
39. SRI. SHAKEEL SAIT S/O ABDUL RAHMAN SAIT, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.209, 9TH B MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040.
40. SRI MAHAMED AHSWAR
S/O NASEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.S2, S.K. HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR, NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 032.
41. SRI NOOR JAHAN
S/O NASEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, WATCHMAKER, R/AT NO.S2 S.K. HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR NO.661, ST MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560 032.
42. SRI ASHOK VARDHAN
S/O SUBEDAR SHAMLAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.SHYAM HOSPITAL AND
RESEARCH CENTRE, KARHALLI ROAD, BENGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114.
...PETITIONERS
191
(BY SRI. VISHWAJITH SHETTY S, ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 20.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 20.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3 ) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNX-A.
IN W.P. NO.9278/2015:
BETWEEN: 1. SRI M. RAGHUKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE C MUNIKRISHNAPPA.
2. SRI. C. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
192
3. SRI C. VENKATARAM S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
4. C. SRINIVASAMURTHY
S/O LATE CHIKKAVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ALL RESIDING NEAR LAKSHMINARAYNASWAMY TEMPLE SAHAKARANAGAR POST, AMRUTHAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 092.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
193
IN W.P. NO.9488/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O POOJAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.104, VIDYASAGAR (SARAI PALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, SRK NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 077,
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA G. GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 VIDE ANN-F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.9576/2015:
BETWEEN:
1 . M GOPAL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
194
2 . M RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
3 . M UDAYKUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 4 . M HARISHKUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, ALL SONS OF SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O POOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.104 VIDYASAGAR (SARAI PALYA)THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, SRK NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560077
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
195
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - F IN SO FAR AS
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC
IN W.P. NO.10923/2015
BETWEEN: SRI D. VENKATA KRISNAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE DASAPPA R/AT NO.627, NEW HOUSING COLONY , I. I. S. C., BANGALORE - 560 012
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNX - J DATED
18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R -1 AND ETC.
196
IN W.P. NO.11344/2015
BETWEEN: SRI. J.K. JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE J M KRISHNAPPA, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHNAKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. MAHESH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 4 . METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, NO.21, GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 5 . BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS
197
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. V.Y. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R4) RESPONDENT NO.5 IS DELETED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 07.10.2015 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.13201/2015
BETWEEN: 1 . SRI NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, 2 . SRI.MUNINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE K. SONNAPPA, 3 . SMT.KANAKAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O LATE M.NAGARAJA, ALL ARE RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 024 4 . SMT. GODHA R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O SRI RAMAPRASAD NO.691,VISHNUCHITTA, 5TH CROSS,
8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE - 560 024
198
5 . SMT. S. M. JAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS W/O SRI H. K. RANGANATHAN, RESIDING AT NO.692, SRIRANGADHAMA, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 6 . SRI N. RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS NO.1,5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, POST BANGALORE-560 024. 7 . SRI V. ANANDA SON OF SRI G. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.6, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 8 . SMT. SOSAMMA THOMAS AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS W/O SRI M. C. THOMAS 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 9 . SRI GIRIJA B. S. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS SON OF LATE SREENIVASA MURTHY B. M. NO.4, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT,DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 10 . SRI M. C. ARBRAHAM,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS SON OF SRI M. L. CHERIAN, NO.2, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN,MARUTHI LAYOUT,
199
DASARAHALLI,HA FARM POST, BANGALORE-560 024. 11 . MRS ELIZABETH ANNA JOHN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS D/O REV. E. C. JOHN NO.5, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 24 12 . SRI ANILA S AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O DR. SURYANARAYANA K NO.3,7,10, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 24 13 . SMT RAMYA SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS W/O SRI ARUN S NO.2, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024 REPRESENTED BY HIS SPA HOLDER AND BROTHER IN LAW SRI. ANILA S. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS S/O DR K. SURYANARAYANA NO.11, NAGAPPA STREET SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 560020 14 . SMT SHASHI KARTHIKEYAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O SRI D KARTHIKEYAN NO.8, 5TH CROSS 8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024
15 . SRI RAGHUNAND C, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O SRI C. CHIKKANNA NO.9, 5TH CROSS
200
8TH MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI, HA FARM POST BANGALORE - 560024.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE- 560001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - S ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.14944/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . DR. M. NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE SRI. M. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.229, 6TH B MAIN, 10TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560002
201
2 . SRI. RAJESH KUMAR S/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.7/2, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 3 . LALTI KUMARI W/O SRI. SAHJANANDA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.7/2, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 4 . SMT. PREMA V. W/O M.N. NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.3, 1ST CROSS, NEAR SINDHI COLLEGE OUT ROAD, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560024 5 . SRI. SUBBARAMAIAH S/O SRI. D.P. ASHWATHANARAYANAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.2, SRINILAYA, 1ST CROSS,KUVEMPU MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-24 6 . AZEEZUNNISA W/O ABDUL KHAYUM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.6, 1ST MAIN ROAD, MUNISWAMY GOWDER LAYOUT, HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024
7 . SMT. KHORESHA KHATOON W/O SRI. H. ANSARI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.16/B,
202
1ST MAIN ,2ND CROSS, MUNISWAMY GOWDA LAYOUT, OPP: SINDHI COLLEGE, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560024 8 . SRI. PONNUSWAMY S/O SRI. MALAYAN AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE, NO.96/1,10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, GANGANAGARA, BANGALORE-560024 9 . SRI. CHINNU S/O SRI. MALAYAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT C/O NARASIMHASWAMY HOUSE, NO.96/1, 10TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, GANGANAGARA, LAKSHMAIAH BLOCK, GANGANAGARA BANGALORE-560024 10 . MR. ALI HUSSAIN KHAN S/O LATE ALIMKHAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT C/O A.K. WELCOME STORES, NO.2,KEMPAPURA MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560024 11 . SRI. M.N. NARAYANA RAJU S/O SRI. RAMARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.2, KEMPAPURA HEBBAL POST, BANGALORE-560024 12 . SRI. SOHAN SHARMA S/O SRI. TEJ NARAYAN SHARMA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.30, BISHEWARA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY LINE, NAGASHETTY HALLI, BANGALORE-560094
203
13 . SRI. RAJAVEL S/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS SECURITY OFFICE OF THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 14 . SRI. B.R. PAPANNA S/O B.P. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS HOUSE NO.201, 1ST BLOCK, POLICE QUARTERS, BRIYAND SQUIRE, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560002
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BASAVARAJA H.T., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
204
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND
(3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, DATED 03.02.2003
AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, PRODUCED
AT ANNEXURE -A & ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY R - 2, R-1 IN SO
AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONER SITUATED IN SY.NO.28/2
AND SY.NO.28/3, IN KEMPAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.17240/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . SMT MANJULA W/O LATE H T MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.97 'A' BLOCK HEBBAL H A FARM POST BENGALURU-560024 2 . SMT SHANTHAKUMARI W/O KRISHNA B. M. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.97 'A' BLOCK HEBBAL H A FARM POST BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. B. AJIT, ADVOCATE AND SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY K.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
205
SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VINAY DEVARAJ, SRI. VIKRAM A. HULIGOL, SRI. M.N. RAAMAJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATES FOR R2 & 3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS
DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - D AND
ETC.
IN W.P. NO.18814/2015:
BETWEEN: SMT KEMPAMMA W/O. LATE SRI. KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NO.145,DHANISANDRA VILLAGE, SHIVARAMKARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560077 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. MURALI BABU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
206
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K.P WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRLY.
NOTIFICATION PASSED U/S.17(1) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT ACT 1978 DATED 03.02.2003, AT ANN - B, &
CONSEQUENTLY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION PASSED UNDER
SEC.19(1) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1978
DATED 23.02.2004, AT ANN - C IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S LAND
ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.19213/2015
BETWEEN:
1 . B. M. GANAPATHI S/O B.K.MACHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO.44, MURTHYUN NELLAYA 11TH CROSS, ATMANANDA COLONY R.T.NAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-32. 2 . JACOB MATHEW
S/O N.J. MATHEW AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, NO.22, VINAYAKANAGAR, SADARAMMA LAYOUT, (NEAR RAILWAY TRACK
207
GEDDALAHALLI) KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 3 . A.THOMAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O A ARICASWAMY NO.38, VINAYAKANAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 4 . N.PURUSHOTHAM S/O NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.43, VINAYAKANAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 5 . KUMAR VELAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O MANI, NO.4, VINAYAKA NAGAR, SHARADAMMA LAYOUT, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK GEDDALAHALLI, KALANAGAR P.O. BANGALORE-560 043. 6 . SHARADAMMA W/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY E.LALITHA, W/O SRI.JAYASHANKARA REDDY, R/AT NO.1, GEDDAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
7 . E.NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O MUNIREDDY, R/AT NO.9, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
208
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 8 . R.M.ASLAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN, R/AT NO.10, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 9 . MRS. AVRIL PATRICK AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O MR.PATRICK, R/AT NO.17, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
10 . A.SHARADAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O N.RAMAMURTHY, R/AT NO.18 & 19, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
11 . ANNIE MATHEW AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O MR.MATHEW KUTTY, R/AT NO.28, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
12 . A.SUBBAREDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O PEDAPPA REDDY, R/AT NO.29, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
13 . SUBBAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
RANGAREDDY, R/AT NO.32, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
209
14 . G.KODANDA RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O MR.BODI REDDY, R/AT NO.36 & 37, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
4 . THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMITTEE BBMP HEAD OFFICE, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - Z AND ETC IN W.P. NO.20191/2015:
BETWEEN:
SOCIETY OF DAUGHTERS OF
210
ST. CAMILLUS A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIEITES REGISTRATION ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: HENNUR MAIN ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGLAORE-560 043, R/BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SISTER ANILA KOMPUTHUKIL AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAYOGI B HALLUR, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVLEOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.06.1978 ISSUED BY R - 2 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 20.07.1978 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.24417/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . SMT.MUNIMARAMMA
211
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, W/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA,. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) 2 . SRI C. SRIRAMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA 3 . C. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA 4 . C. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 4 . THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX,
212
J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H WITH THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.24418/2015
BETWEEN: 1 . SRI.C.SRIRAMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, 2 . C. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, 3 . C. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, ALL RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILALGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-506 001. 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
213
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4 . METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, NO.21, GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5 . BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX, J. C. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 RESPONDENT NO.5 DELETED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 12/03/2018) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - L WITH THE WRIT PETITION. (II) QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE R -2 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX - G AS WELL AS THE APPROVAL OF THE R -1 DATED 19.12.2003 VIDE ANNX - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.28143/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . MR.KEWAL KISHAN SETH
S/O LATE BAVANDAS SETH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
214
2 . MRS. PURNIMA SETH W/O MR. KEWAL K SETH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 3 . MR. VIRESH SETH, S/O MR. KEWAL K SETH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4 . MR. NITESH SETH S/O MR. KEWAL K. SETH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERSONS ARE RESIDENTS OF RICHARDSTRAFFE, 54-56, 22081 HAMBURG, GERMANY. REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.GYAN SINGH BIST S/O GHEENA SINGH BIST, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.4410, 4TH FLOOR, HIGHPOINT IV, 45 PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001
...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. GEETHA MENON, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
215
…RESPONDENTS (BY G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA R1; SRI. K. KRISNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE
RESPONDENTS IN SO FAR AS THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS
MENTIONED AT SL.NO.9 AND 10 THEREIN ARE CONCERNED
VIDE ANN - A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.28673/2015 BETWEEN: SHRI M.N. THYAGARAJ S/O LATE V.S.NARAYANA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, 1 MAIN, 6TH CROSS, MARUTHI EXTENSION, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, SRIRAMPURAM, BENGALURU-560021.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
216
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND
RESPONDENT 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID
DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE
COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE
REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - N & P
RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.
IN W.P. NO.28676/2015
BETWEEN: SMT A. C. SHOBHA RANI W/O G. CHANNAKESHAVA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.2753, 'E' BLOCK, SHAHAKARA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 092.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY 2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
217
KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT & APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - P AND Q RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.28679/2015
BETWEEN: SHRI P. B. AMRUNATHA PANICKER S/O MR. P.KL. BAHULEYAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT C/O K. RAJAGOPAL, NO.302, BANASHANKARI, CORAL NO.20, 2ND CROSS,M.M. LAYOUT, K.B. SANDRA, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADV.) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
218
2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M B PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1
& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE
HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE
APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN
(2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE
PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE- L & M RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED
THROUGH HIS SOCIETY.
IN W.P. NO.29317/2015:
BETWEEN: SMT. RADHAMMA W/O S. N. BACHANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.108, SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, SAMPIGE HALLI, JAKKUR POST,
YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER
219
(BY SRI. Y. S. VEDHUKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-01 2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 & R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED
20.01.2015 VIDE ANNX - A AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.29541/2015:
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI K. S. VITALAKSHA S/O SRI MUDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80, 6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, WORK LAYOUT, SHANKARNAGAR, BANGLAORE-560 096.
220
2 . SRI K. P. ANANDA, S/O SRI K. M. PRABHAKARA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.645, BAPUJI COLONY, KENGERI POST, BANGALORE-506 060.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
1 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
2 . THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE NO. 71, SITUATED AT BLOCK -7, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN FAVOUR OF P-1 AND SITE NO. 829, SITUATED AT BLOCK -11, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT IN FAVOUR P -2 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONERS IN POSSESSION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SITES AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.30781/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . SRI BACHAPPA S/O LATE MARIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, R/AT NO.172, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560077
SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S
1(a). SMT. MARIYAMMA
221
W/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 1(b). SRI. B. KRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 52 YEARS 1(c). SRI. B. CHANDRAPPA S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 52 YEARS 1(d). SRI. B. NARAYANSWAMY S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 1(e). SRI. B. MANJUNATH S/O.LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 1(f). SRI. B. RAMANJI S/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED 43 YEARS SL.NO. 1(a) to 1(f) ARE R/AT NO. 172, NEAR B.B.M.P OFFICE TANISANDRA S.R.K. NAGAR POST BANGALORE- 77
1(g). SMT. GAYATRIYAMMA @ GAYATRI D/O. LATE BACHAPPA W/O. G.A. GANGADHAR GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT. GANTAGARA CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA
1(h). KUMARI CHANDRAKALA D/O. LATE BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT. NO. 172, NEAR B.B.M.P. OFFICE TANISANDRA, S.R.K. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 77
...PETITIONERS
222
(BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF SECOND FINAL
DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE
ANNEX - L TO THE W.P. AND TO DECLARE THE SCHEME
FORMULATED BY THE BDA UNDER THE NAME CALLED
"ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" AS LAPSED IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER'S
LAND IS CONCERNED AND QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED
11.03.2015 ONE ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEX - J TO THE
W.P.
IN W.P. NO.31794/2015:
BETWEEN: 1 . SRI. M. MAHENDRA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA,
223
2 . SRI M RAJAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA, 3 . SMT AMMAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O RAMAIAH, 4 . SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA, 5 . SRI MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE POOJARI CHIKKANNA, 6 . SMT GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, W/O LATE SONNAPPA 7 . SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O A. M. MUNEGOWDA, 8 . SRI AMBARISH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA, 9 . SRI RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O MARAPPA, 10 . SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIBELLAPPA 11 . SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE PILLAPPA, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASARAHALLI,
K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 024
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND
224
SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN
- E IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER AND THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO. 32423/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MOHAMMED HEMANI S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI , AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SRI. PYAR ALI HEMANI S/O LATE MOHAMMED ALI HEMANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.70, CHIKKA BAZAR CROSS,
225
TASKAR TOWN, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560051
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN, DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R -1 VIDE ANNX - G IN SO FAR AS THE SUBJECT LAND IN SY.NO.46/4 MEASURING 1.00 ACRE OF LAND OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33127/ 2015: BETWEEN:
SMT SUSHEELAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH, RESIDING AT SRI. VINAYAKA NILAYA
226
LAKSHMINARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560092
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNEX - G IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33128/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. TOTADA MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST,
227
BANGALORE 560092 (SR.CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE - 560020 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE -560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSERL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - F AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 33131/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA, 2. SRI. KALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 064
228
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
BANGALORE - 560020 ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - H AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33133/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI B. K. SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
S/O SRI B. KENCHAPPA, RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
229
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX
- F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33134/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O KONEERAPPA, 2. SRI K. MANJUNATH S/O KONEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
230
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD 426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE
DATED 28.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - G AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 33137/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. A. SATHYANARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
SON OF LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH, RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560077 (SR. CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
231
URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX -
F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35055/ 2015: BETWEEN: SMT. NAGARATHNA W/O LATE SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.104, 3RD CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BANGALORE-560 080
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3
232
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE NO.830 SITUATED AT BLOCK -11, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PUT THE PETITIONER IN POSSESSION ON HER SITE AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 35464/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE N.K.APPAYANNA, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI.N.J.MURTHY, S/O SRI. M. A. JAYARAMAIAH, 47 YEARS NO.B302, KRISHNA DIAMOND APARTMENTS, A-BLOCK, SAHAKARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560092. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-01. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
233
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 35465/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DESIKACHAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. 2. SRI. PADMANABHACHAR, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYACHAR R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BOTH REPRESENTED BY M/S POOJA BUILDERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
234
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3))
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER IS
CONCERNED VIDE ANN - F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 35842/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI L RAJANNA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 080 SENIOR CITZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. C. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
235
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION TO THE SUBJECT LAND OF THE PETITIONERS
DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN - M AND
ETC.
IN W.P NO. 37412/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077
2. SHRI BINOJ KOSHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 SERVING AS LT. COL. IN THE INDIAN ARMY CAMP, GANDHIANGAR, GUJARAT-382 042 3. SHRI BIJU KOSHY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE M. KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077
236
4. MRS. BIJI RONALD GEORGE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O LATE M KOSHY @ MATHAI KOSHY, NO.2, AMARJYOTHI LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA, BANGALORE-560 077 PETITIONER NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SMT. MARIAMMA KOSHY (FIRST PETITIONER)
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. V. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. P.S. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGAL , ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.07.2015 AT ANNEXURE - S ISSUED BY
THE R -3 AND ETC.
237
IN W.P NO. 40838/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI S. SHESHACHAR AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRINIVASACHAR, RESIDING AT #57, RACHENAHALLI, SHIVARAMA KARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560077. SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX -
E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 44088/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
MR. SADATHULLA KHAN
238
S/O LATE B. PEER KHAN NO.59/3, 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, PILLAPPA BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. VICTOR MANOHARAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (UDD) VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K.P. WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO GRANT AN ALTERNATIVE SITE TOWARDS ACQUISITION FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OF HIS SITE NO.7 FALLING IN SY NO.97/1 SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P NO. 45662/ 2015:
BETWEEN: K. V. BACHIREDDY S/O LATE V. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
239
NO.52/1, 7TH MAIN ROAD, THIMMAREDDY ROAD, APPAREDDYPALYA INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 038
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (NORTH DIVISION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R - 1 DATED 04.04.2014 AT ANNEX - G TO THE W.P. AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47015/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT RADHA RUKMINI
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, W/O LATE G. CHINNAPPA, R/AT K-7, (48/1), RUKMINI BUILDING, 3RD MAIN, LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM, SRIRAMPURAM, BANGALORE-560 021 SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM 2. SRI. VENKATAPPA
240
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O DODDAVEEERANAGAPPA, RESIDING AT KACHALLI, TUBUGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIM 3. SRI. M. RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O M. N. MANCHAPPA, R/AT NO.423, 4TH MAIN, GANIGARA PETE, DODDABALLAPUR, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, SR CITIZEN NOT CLAIM PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY SMT. RADHA RUKMINI
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
241
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION OF THE R -1 DATED 31.07.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47820/ 2015: BETWEEN: SRI. M. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O SRI. M. RAMARAJU, R/AT NO. 6/1, I FLOOR, KHM BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032 REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI.TEJRAJ GULECHA S/O LATE PUKHRAJ GULECHA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, NO. 9/1, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025. SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
242
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ISSUING R-1 ANNEXURE -F AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47821/ 2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, 2. SRI SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA 3. SRI. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPALAPPA, 4. SRI. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH 5. SMT. SHOBA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D/O LATE RAMAIAH 6. SRI. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
7. SRI. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
243
8. SRI. SUJENDRA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, ALL ARE RESIDING AT TANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. RAMESHKUMAR GULECHA S/O PUKHRAJ GULECHA, MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )
244
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47822/ 2015:
BETWEEN:
SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS W/O A.M. SURYANARAYANAGOWDA R/AT NO.308, 4TH B CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY M/S MANYATA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD., NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. TEJRAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT Y BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.
245
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC.
IN W.P NO. 47823/ 2015:
BETWEEN: SMT. SUBHA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O RAVIKUMAR R/AT NO.16, VANIVILAS ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560 004 REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA S/O. MR PUKHRAJ GULECHA MAJOR, NO.9/1, I FLOOR CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
246
URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 )
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.47824/2015:
BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMI SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O B.A. SRINIVAS GUPTA, R/AT NO. 16, VANIVILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. TEJARAJ GULECHA S/O MR. PUKHRAJ GULECHA, MAJOR, NO.9/1, 1ST FLOOR, CLASSIC COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE)
247
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITHY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.47825/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI R. ADINARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
2. SRI. R. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
3. SRI. R. BASAVARAJU
248
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
4. SRI. R. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE N. RAMAIAH (SR.CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) ALL RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C AND ETC.
249
IN W.P. NO.47826/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT V. JAYALAKSHMI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS D/O VENKATAPPA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
2. SRI. PADMANABHACHARYA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA @ GUNDAPPA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
3. SRI. DESIKACHAR AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANATHARAYA SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED ALL RESIDING AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWR OF ATTORNEY M/S POOJA BUILDERS, NO.86, 2ND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009 BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. TEJARAJ GULECHA
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
250
AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE RAOD, BANGALORE-20
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - F AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.47827/2015: BETWEEN: SRI C. DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA R/AT RACHENAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. KIRAN J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
251
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.49842/2015:
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA R/AT TANISANDRA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, S. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST,
252
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.
3. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.
4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALOARE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.49843/2015: BETWEEN: SRI BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYANNA R/AT TANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING,
253
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.56271/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N. RAJU
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O P. NARAYANASWAMY R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043.
2. SMT. TEJASWINI
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O SRI. N. RAJU R/AT NO.95, HORAMAVU AGARA HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
254
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57432/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GOVINDASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O MUNISWAMAPPA
2. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O B.H.C. MUNEGOWDA BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
K.NARAYANAPURA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONERS
255
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560028
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560028
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57434/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. S. RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O H. SUBBANNA (LATE) RESIDING AT
K. NARAYANAPURA K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
256
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.57438/2015:
BETWEEN: SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAPPA RESIDING AT THANISANDRA
K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
257
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.57439/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, S/O LATE SONAPPA R/AT THANISANDRA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
258
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST,
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.57992/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. CHINNAPPA S/O. ENESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT MESTRIPALYA, KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE-560 001.
259
2 . THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANN-F AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.59004/2015: BETWEEN: MUNIRAMAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR SRI. SUBRAMANI, S/O. LATE MUNIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT: SRIRAMPURA, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE, SRI. ARVIND C. DESAI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REP BY ITS
260
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1)
OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER
SECTION 19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE - D ISSUED BY
THE R-1 AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY THE
R -1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY CONCERNED AS
LAPSED IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR
COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION
REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.59486/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT R. SHOBHA
W/O. VENKATARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2. SMT. R. NIRMALA
261
W/O. SRI JAYARAJU N. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SMT R. PREMAKUMARI W/O. SRI P. ASHWATHANARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. SMT. R. SHEELA RANI W/O SRI. L. NARENDRA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 5. SMT. R. SUDHA W/O SRI JAYARAJU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 6. SMT R. ROOPA W/O SRI RAVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT: NO. 390, J. R. LAYOUT 1ST MAIN ROAD CHELIKERE KALYANANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 043.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 01 REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
262
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION U/S. 17[1] & [3] DATED 03.02.2003, PUBLISHED IN
THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY R-1 AND QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION U/S 19[1] DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING SY.NO.5 MEASURING 21 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEX - G ISSUED BY R -1.
IN W.P. NO.59492/2015: BETWEEN: HANUMA REDDY S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT CHELLAKERE PALLOTI NILAYA KALYAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560043
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 01 REPTD. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER
263
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF
THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14
GUNTAS PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE - D. (II) QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1) DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS
LAND BEARING NO. 4/1 MEASURING 14 GUNTAS PRODUCED
VIDE ANNEXURE - F.
IN W.P. NO.59495/2015: BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. SRI S. PRAKASH S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 3. SRI S. ANIL REDDY S/O LATE SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. SMT. S.AMARAVATHI
264
W/O A. SURESH KUMAR, D/O LATE P.SHANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT: CHELLAKERE VILLAGE KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE -1. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF BDA ACT DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY.NO.4/2 MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - G ISSUED BY R-1. (II) QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION U/S 19(1) OF BDA ACT DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY.NO.4/2 MEASURING 23 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY R-1.
IN W.P. NO.742/2016:
BETWEEN:
265
SMT. K. N. SHOBHA W/O. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.93/A, THEJAS NILAYA, 5TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR,A BANGALORE-560 010.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-4 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SITE CANCELLATION ORDER DATED 02.07.2008 [ANNEX - E] IN RESPECT OF SITE NO. 780, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BLOCK - X, BANGALORE AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.751/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI B. H. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE B. HANUMANTHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.119, UTI BANK RAC, 80 FEET ROAD, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095
...PETITIONER
266
(BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H. M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. A. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT, REGISTER AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF A SITE MEASURING 30 X 40 FEET IN BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGALORE IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 184/E WHICH WAS ALLOTTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.2392/2016: BETWEEN:
MR. JOKIM AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O SRI. ANNAYAPPA R/AT NO.198, CHURCH BLOCK, VISHWANATHANAGENAHALLI R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFFI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING &
267
URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNX - F AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2397/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. A. RUDRAPPA S/O ANJINAPPA, AGD ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.73, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, HEBBAL FARM POST, BANGALORE-560024
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTRMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REP BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001
268
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 17(1)
OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-B & FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-2 U/S 19(1) OF BDA ACT VIDE
ANNX -C AND RE- MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014
ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNX-M
IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY BEARING
SY.NO.28/1 MEASURING 20 GUNTAS OF KEMPAPURA VILLAGE IS
CONCERNED AS LAPSED COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY
IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT
ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2915/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. H. GANGANNA S/O LATE HANUMANTHA AGED AOBUT 62 YEARS R/O NO.110,
2ND MAIN, KAREKALLU, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BASAVESWARANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079
269
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. LAKSHMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISISONER
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.C OUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS VIDE ANNEX - J TO J5 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5417/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C. SRIRAMA S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. SRI. C. SRINIVAS S/O LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SRI. C. PAPANNA S/O. LATE CHANNARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE.
4. BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT XXI OF 1860 NO.211,RASH BEHARI AVENUE,
270
KOLKATTA-70019(W.B) BRANCH AT NO.118/2, AMRUTHAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY SWAMI SIVAPREMANANDA AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF BHARAT SEVASHRAM SANGHA NO.118/2,AMRUTHAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H. R. ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NO.7,T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 4. THE METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ROOM NO.1,GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 5. THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BBMP COMPLEX,
271
J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - K1 AND QUASH THE BULK ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED 21.10.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2 WHICH IS ANNEXED AS ANNEXURE - H1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5446/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. P. DHANALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED) R/O SRI.LAKSHMINARAYANA, NO.1292, 8TH MAIN ROAD, WEST OF CORD ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. SINCE DECEASED BY LRS SMT. T.H. VANISHREE W/O. T.S. HARINATH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/A NO: 563, IST MAIN ROAD NAGENDRA BLOCK, BANASHANKARI IST STAGE BENGALURU.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
272
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-II BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED RESOLUTION DATED 23.09.2015 PASSED IN SUBJECT NO. 115/2015 BY THE RESPONDENT BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AT ANNX - G AND THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.10.2015 ISSUED BY R-1 AT ANNEX - H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5448/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE K ADINARAYANA GOWDA 58 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO.1, SY.NO.20/1 JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANAKA ROAD BANGALORE NORTH(ADDL), TALUK BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. RAJANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
273
SL.NOS 2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF THE BDA T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU -560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
NOTIFICATION DATED18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -A ACQUIRING LAND
OF THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO.709 BEARING SY.NO.20/1 OF
JAKKUR MEASURING 0.22 GUNTAS AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6717/2016: BETWEEN: SRI D. V. CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O D. V. VEERANNA R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 038
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
274
BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. V. SHIVAREDDY S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN 13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003 5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT FLATNO. 301 'PALASHA RESIDENCE' #26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560003
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL AND SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. ASHOK HARNAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. MANJUNATH K.V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEXURE - C IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6718/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SATISH
275
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O D. V. NARAYANASWAMY R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE K. R. PURAM HOBLI - 560038 BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. V. SHIVAREDDY S/O. K.S. VENKATAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO. 51/5, 6TH MAIN 13TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003 5. S.S. SRINIVAS RAO S/O. PROF S.L. SEETHARAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT FLATNO. 301 'PALASHA RESIDENCE' #26, IX CROSS, IV MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE - 560003
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
276
SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEXURE - C ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.10318/2016: BETWEEN: MR.SWAMY GOWDA S/O LATE CHELUVE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 634/19, 6TH MAIN ROAD SHIVAJI MAHARAJA ROAD BHAVANI NAGAR, K G NAGAR BANGALORE-560019
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN K., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHAOWDAYYA ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO COMPLETE THE CONVEYANCE IN PURSUANCE
OF THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 24.06.2006 AT ANNEX - B IN
RESPECT OF SITE NO. 834 ALLOTED TO THE PETITIONER AT
BLOCK V OF ARKAVATHY LAYOUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW
AND ETC.
277
IN W.P.NO.11295/2016: BETWEEN: C. R. SHIVASHANKAR S/O SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO.457, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS, IDEAL HOMES LAYOUT, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 098
...PETITIONER (BY SMT. LEELA KRISHNAN D., ADVOCATE) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BDA COMPLEX, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-20 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO REGISTER SCHEDULE SITE BEARING NO. 1494, 7TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, ALLOTTED TO HIM UNDER ANNEXURE - A OR TO ALLOT HIM A SUITABLE ALTERNATE SITE MEASURING 15 MTRS X 24 MTRS INANY OF ITS LAYOUTS AND REGISTER THE SAME EXPEDIOUSLY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.11493/2016: BETWEEN: 1. ANTHONYSWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE AROGYAPPA SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED 2. A. JOSEPH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE AROGYAPPA SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED BOTH RESIDING AT NO.158,
278
M. M. REDDY ROAD MARIYANNAPALYA H. A. FARM POST BANGALORE-560 024
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMETN MULTISTORIED BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 & 2 TO
FORTHWITH CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION OF R - 3
DATED 27.03.2013 AT ANNEX - B AND EXCLUDE THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11844/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS WIFE OF LATE SHAMANNA RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE
279
YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560004 (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTRISTORIED BUILDING B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11846/2016: BETWEEN: SRI BACHANNA
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, SON OF LATE MARINANJAPPA RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI,
280
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-560064 (SR. CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - C IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12010/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. CHIKKANNAPPA S/O CHIKKAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS DODDATUMAKUR VILLAGE & POPST,
DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
281
(BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK PART WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REFUND EXCESS AMOUNT COLLECTED FROM THE PETITIONER WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18% FROM THE DATE OF DEPOSIT TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12674/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. JHANSI RANI AKKIRAJU W/O SIV PRASAD AKKI RAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201, HOUSE NO.274, 8TH MAIN ROAD, BEML LAYOUT, THUBARAHALLI BANGALORE-68
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. REUBEN JACOB, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
282
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-20 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B. S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-2, FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 BOTH ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX - C, D & G TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR AS THE LAND IN SY.NO.38/1 OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH ADDL. TQ., BENGALURU DISTRICT MEASURING 1 ACRE 35 GUNTAS IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.13637/2016:
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. SHAKUNTHALA W/O T.R.NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.4, 7TH A MAIN ROAD, MUTHYALANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 074
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. N. VISHWANATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK (WEST) BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
283
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. C. R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR ALLOTMENT OF SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14280/2016: BETWEEN: SRI R. DAYANAND REDDY S/O. LATE. V. RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17, 8TH CROSS, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, K. K. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 084
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGAMESH R. B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE- 01, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 20
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED WHICH IS BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER ( ANNEXURE -G) AND ETC.
284
IN W.P.NO.14649/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE. JAYARAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 01. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 16 GUNTAS PRODUCED AT
VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.
285
IN W.P.NO.14650/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAIAH S/O. LATE. CHIKKA THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT IS NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 01. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS LAND BEARING SY. NO. 12/2 MEASURING 29 GUNTAS EXCLUDING 5 GUNTAS OF KHARAB PRODUCED AT VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC.
286
IN W.P.NO.15833/2016: BETWEEN: SRI KADAMPULLY SUKUMARAN KARTHIK AGE:50 YEARS SON OF SRI. KADAMPULLY APPU SUKUMARAN RESIDINT AT VILLA 36, LIFESTYLE, IVC ROAD, DEVANAHALLI - 562 110 BANGALORE EARLIER RESIDENT OF WII/247, THEVAR MADAM ROAD, CHOWANNUR, KUNNAMKULAM THRISSUR - 680 503 KERALA
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH S. ARBATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D .N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - G DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
287
IN W.P.NO.19019/2016: BETWEEN: SRI BHARATH KUMAR N S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/A NO.78, K NARAYANAPURA ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE--560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2013 PASSED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED AND ETC.,
288
IN W.P.NO.19020/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. BHARATH KUMAR N S/O SRI. NARAYANAPPA, AGE 26 YEARS, R/AT NO.78, K.NARAYANAPURA, ANJANEYA TEMPLE MAIN ROAD, SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. R. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 3.2.2003 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.,
289
IN W.P.NO.23623/2016: BETWEEN 1. R. M. ANBUMANI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O K. R. MASILAMANI, NO.19, III CROSS, III STAGE, III PHASE, VTH BLOCK, BANASHANAKARI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 2. M. G. SUBRAMANIAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O M.R. GOPALAKRISHNAN, SAM TOWERS,C-2, II FLOOR, NO.22, RAJU STREET, CHENNAI - 600023. 3. A. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O R. ANNAMALAI, R/AT S-4, KALAPATHARU APARTMENT, 51, VELLALAR STREET, ADAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 088. 4. HERAMBA KARTHIK. B, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O LATE R. BALASUBRAMANIAN R/AT FLAT NO.102, SCION ARCH APARTMENTS, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, C. V. RAMAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 093. 5. S. JAYARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SRI. G. SRINIVASAN, R/AT C/O JAGADISH, NO.4/1, OLD NO.34, II FLOOR,
VI CROSS, SMB COLONY, MATHIKERE, BRINDAVANNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 054
290
6. V. K. VERMA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O P. P. SHRIVSTAVA, NO.20, MANU MANDIR, WORLI HILL ESTATE, WORLI, MUMBAI-400 018. 7. K. R. SRINIVASAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O. K.R.R. AIYANGAR, NO.22, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD PHASE, J P NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. 8. S. ILANGO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O T. M. SHANMUGAM, R/AT NO. 2472, 15TH CROSS, 27TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT, SECTOR-1, BANGALORE-560 102. 9. MEENAKSHI JAGADEESA. N, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O LATE JAGADEESAN, R/AT NO.716, 7TH A MAIN, H.R.B.R.1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 043. 10. SARASWATHI VAITHIANATHAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS W/O R. VAITHIANATHAN, A-204,SEA FLAMA, DOSTI FLAMINGO, 2ND FLOOR, T. J. ROAD, SEWREE, MUMBAI - 400 015. 11. K. V. S. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE K. S. VISHWANATH NO.301, PALACE VIEW APARTMENTS
14, JAYAMAHAL MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 046 12. H. ROHINESH
291
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O K. SUBBAIAH 34, AMIT TATA SOCIETY, MURARI GHAG MARG, PRABHADEVI, MUMBAI - 400 025 13. M.H.P. ACHAR, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O M. S. HANUMANTH ACHAR, R/AT NO.320, 5TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, N.R.COLONY, BANGALORE-560 019 14. B. KANNAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O SRI. M. BALGURUMURTHY, R/AT C/O KAMAL KISHORE, NO.704, 8TH CROSS, INDIRANAGAR, II STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 038. 15. K. V. VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O K. VASUDEVA RAO, R/AT NO.G-1, LAKSHMANA KRUPA APARTMENTS, NO.23, EAST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004. 16. G. DAMODARAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O A. P. GOVINDARAJ R/AT NO.24, SHAMANNA LANE, CHURCH ROAD, MURUGESH PALYA, BANGALORE - 560 017. 17. NITIN SETH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
S/O LATE S. L. SETH, R/AT NO.146, JALVAU VIHAR, KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, H.R.B.R. LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 084.
292
18. V. SUNDRESH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE A.P.V.RAO, NO.1555/C,16TH A MAIN, J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 032. 19. ASURI SRINIVASAN RANGAN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, 5TH CROSS, M. R. GARDENS, V NAGENAHALLI, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032. 20. S. RENGARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O G. SRINIVASAN, R/AT C/O PRAKASH RENGARAJAN, NO.1091, SOBHA PRIMROSE, SARAJAPUR OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDUR, BANGALORE-560 103. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. N. DINESH RAO, ADVOCATE ) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT
CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONBALE TIME AND ETC.,
293
IN W.P.NO.23643/2016: BETWEEN: 1. V. F. BANAJI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O FARROKI DADI BANAJI C/O R M ANBUMANI R/AT INLAND EVER GLADES, APARTMENTS, NO 121, 1ST FLOOR, 'B' BLOCK, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA DASARHALLI MAIN ROAD HA FARM POST DASARHALLI POST BANGALORE - 560 024. 2. A VIDYA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O C S BALAKRISHNAN FLAT NO 4, SATHYAM APARTMENTS 18, II MAIN R A PURAM CHENNAI - 600 028 3. T A REVATHI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O SRI T K ANANTHA SAYANAM R/AT FLAT NO 405-E S S ENVIRONS CHELEKERE, K R PURAM HOBLI KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043 4. MANI RAMAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNASWAMY RAMAN, R/AT NO 2581, 17TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, II STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 008 5. P SHASHIKANTH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O SRI P GOVIND RAO
R/AT NO 20, KRISHNA KUNJ JALADARSHINI LAYOUT MATHIKERE POST, BANGALORE - 560 054.
294
6. VENKAT SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O A P V RAO NO 2, 8TH CROSS (266/11) 3RD MAIN, HANUMANTHA NAGAR MUMBAI - 560 019. 7. Y CHANDRASEKHAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O T V Y RAMAN, C/O V SUNDARESH, NO 1555/C 16TH 'A' MAIN J P NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078. 8. BANSILAL DHAR AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O DR PREMNATH DHAR R/AT HOUSE NO 1746, SECTOR 28, FARIDABAD - 121 008. (HARYANA) 9. ANU SETH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O NITHIN SETH R/AT FLAT NO 315, RMV CLUSTERS PHASE I RMV EXTN II STAGE BANGALORE - 560 094. 10. V R HERKAL AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O R B HERKAL R/O FLAT NO C-403 AVON MAJESTY, DATTAPADA ROAD BORIVALI (EAST) MUMBAI - 400 066. 11. M S JAVEED HAFEEZ AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O DR M A HAFEES R/AT PALM SPRINGS, NO 6, G 01, 16TH MAIN,
295
7TH CROSS, 4TH B BLOCK KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 005. 12. GAYATHRI RANGARAJAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O RANGARAJAN R/AT FLAT NO 302 III FLOOR SWATHI APARTMENTS, V MAIN DEFENCE COLONY INDIRA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 039. 13 . S SHANKAR PRASED AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O S M SEETHARAMAIAH, R/AT NO 79 SHANKAR MUTT COMPOUND CHIKKANNA GARDEN 2ND CROSS, SHANKARAPURAM BANGALORE - 560 004. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N, ADVOCATE ) AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE ) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE
PETITIONER IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT
CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT
TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS
WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.,
296
IN W.P.NO.23656/2016: BETWEEN: A N PRAKASH RAO AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O A NARAYAN RAO R/AT NO.598, 11TH CROSS, J P NAGAR PHASE-III, BANGALORE-560 078. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SPECIAL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD. 2.12.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.70-C, KHATHA NO.142/70-C, CARVED OUT OF SY.NO.81/2B OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.24322/2016:
BETWEEN: 1. MR D O BERGER S/O A. E. BERGER, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
297
(SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED) R/AT NO.4/668, P & T COLONY, RAMACHANDRANAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANDHRA PRADESH PIN:515 801, NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE. 2. MRS. BEVERLY MARY BERGER W/O H.D.BERGER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.611B, RAILWAY QUARTERS, ARAVINDNAGAR, GUNTAKAL, A.P. PIN:515 801. NOW CAMP AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SREENIVASAMURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
298
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-H DTD.18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNEXURE-H AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.24676/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY.R AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560043. 2. SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O LATE NAGENDRA. R AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 043. 3. SMT. SUGUNA W/O LATE MUNIRAJU.R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043. 4. SHANKAR REDDY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT
CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560043.
299
5. RAJA REDDY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT CHELLAKARE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. K BHANU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-1. REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 BDA AND ITS OFFICIALS FROM IN ANY WAY INTERFERING OR FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERY SINCE THE SAME HAS NOT BEEN ACQUIRED FOR ITS ANY SCHEMES INCLUDING THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI
LAYOUT AND ETC.,
300
IN W.P.NO.24919/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T.C. HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045 2. SRI H BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O T C HEMANNA R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045. 3. SRI T C CHINNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045 4. SRI C GIRISH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O T C CHINNSWAMY R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI, ARABIC POST, BANGALORE-560 045. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001
301
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K P WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 4. SMT NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O LATE D KRISHNA, R/AT NO.1/1, ALUR CROSS, MAKALI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE-562 123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. NARAYANAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DT.18.6.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E. ANNEXURE-G IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS IN SY.NO.80/1 OF THE THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TQ., MEASURING 1 ACRE 17 GUNTAS. IN W.P.NO.25131/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA S/O SHRI. KRISHNE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.95, 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-43. ...PETITIONER
302
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-01 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITON FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DTD 18.06.2014, AS PER ANNEXURE-H, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.25132/2016: BETWEEN: SHRI G K RAMEGOWDA S/O SHRI KRISHNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.95, 1ST CROSS 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 043. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE)
303
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-H IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.30680/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. HUCHAPPA B AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF LATE BILLIYAPPA RESIDING AT NO.40/2/14 OPP CHBS LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE-560 040
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
304
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.6.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.33181/2016: BETWEEN: SRI J MUNNAGAPPA S/O LATE B JAYARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO 96 B NAGASANDRA YAMALUR POST BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GIRISHA N. R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY
305
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-1 KARNATAKA. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD:3.2.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD:23.2.2004 WITH REGARD TO ACQUISITION OF PETITIONERS LANDS BEARING SY NO.16/10A THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND DROP THE SAME FROM THE ACQUISTION UNDER THE SAID NOTIFICATIONS, CONSEQUENTLY RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENTS FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITIONERS SITES THEREIN WITHOUT TAKING DUE RECOURSE OF LAW AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.33196/2016:
BETWEEN: 1. SRI. LOKANANDA NAIDU S/O LATE B RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1197/C, 22ND A CROSS, 23RD MAIN, BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 070. 2. SRI. B R CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. LATE B RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 195, 13TH CROSS,
306
HIG COLONY, RMV 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 092.
3. SMT. P ANITHA D/O ANJANEY NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO. 11-67-1, N.G.O.
COLONY, PUTTUR - 577 583 CHITTUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANGADI S. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BDA, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. H.T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD18.6.2014 (ANNEXURE-F) IN SO FOR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED. IN W.P.NO.33279/2016: BETWEEN: MR MOHAMMED MUZZAMIL SON OF MOHAMMED YOUSUFF AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
NO.8, 5TH CROSS, MUNIMARAPPA GARDEN J. C. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 046
REPRESENTED BY HIS DULY CONSTITUTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
307
MR. MOHAMMED YOUSUFF SON OF MOHAMMED AHMED ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KAMAL M G S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA VEEDHI DR AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR T CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE NOTIFICATION BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND AFTER GOING THROUGH THE PROPRIETY OR OTHERWISE OF ISSUING THE SAME PASS ORDER/S ISSUE WRIT/S SETTING ASIDE/QUASH THE SAME TO THE EXTENT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS SPECIFIED AT SL.NO.1096 OF THE SCHEDULE TO THE SAID NOTIFICATION; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.33385/2016:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
308
RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 2. SRI N RAJA S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 3. SRI SIDDARAJU S/O LATE MALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 4. SRI MUNINANJAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. 5. SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA), THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
6. SRI CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ THAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIDYASAGARA (SARAIPALYA),
309
THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, S R K NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANASOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.M. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K.N. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-K TO THE WRIT PETITION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY DESCRIBED AT THE SCHEDULE AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.34348/2016:
BETWEEN: ANJENAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
310
R/AT A PORTION OF THE SY.NO 84/4, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAPEGOWDA B., ADVOCATE & SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE & SRI. K.R. SREENIVASA PARAVARDHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING OF THE PETITIONER AS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.35687/2016: BETWEEN
1. SMT. AMARAVATHI WIFE OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK.
2. CHI VISWNATH GOWDA N SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS (REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND
311
LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI) RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 3. CHI HEMANTHA GOWDA SON OF LATE M NAGESHAA AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS (REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND LEGAL GUARDIAN SMT AMARAVATHI) RESIDING AT NO 224, 1ST CROSS, MUNESWARA TEMPLE B CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER K.P. WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. DEPUTY SECRETARY - 1 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY K P WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 4. SRI G NAGARAJ SON OF LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 10/25 4TH CROSS ROAD,
BANASWADI M S NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 033.
312
5. SRI B R S KUMAR SON OF SRI RAJASHEKARAIH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 1105 "SANJEEVINI" 10TH MAIN ROAD RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE - 560040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE OFFICE OF R-1 TO 3 IN THE MATTER OF ALLOTMENT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF LATE SRI. ERANNA VIDE ALLOTMENT LETTER NO.477/2014-15 DATED 16.09.2014 AT ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.35851/2016: BETWEEN 1. SRI J DEVARAJ S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, GOVT SCHOOL ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU 560 064. 2. SRI. J. MUNISWAMY GOWDA S/O. LATE. J M JAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, GOVT SCHOOL ROAD, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU- 560 064.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
313
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER SI.NOS.2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH, (SANKEY) ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGLAURU- 560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SI.NOS. 2 TO 3 ARE AT OFFICE OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,T. CHOWDAIAH, (SANKEY) ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGLAURU- 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DTD:18.6.2014 AS AT ANNEXURE-A IN
SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS DEVELOPED
SCHEDULE LAND OF SYNO.20/9 MEASURING 0.21 GUNTA OF
JAKKUR NOTIFIED AS AT SL NO.711 IN PAGE 37 OF THE
NOTIFICATION AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.36525/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI H D NANJE GOWDA S/O LATE DODDAGULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 41/1 HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT 10TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
314
KALYAN NAGAR POST , BENGALURU - 560 043. 2. SRI H M RAMESH S/O LATE MUNNE GOWDA @ MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT 9, 'SRI MARUTHI ARCADE', HENNUR MARUTHI LAYOUT , 9TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS KALYAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 01. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND FINAL DECLARATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DTD:18.6.2014 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-J TO THE WP IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER PROPERTY WHICH IS MOREFULLY DESCRIBED AT THE SHCEDULE AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.37682/2016:
BETWEEN 1. SRI. SATHISH
315
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT DASARAHALLI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 021. 2. SRI RAJESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE D V NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT DASARAHALLI, K. R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560021. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-G; AND ETC.,
316
IN W.P.NO.38430/2016: BETWEEN 1. SRI A MUTHU S/O LATE ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 44, KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 2. SMT SHANTHI W/O A MUTHU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 44 KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 3. MR MAHROOQ ABBASIA W/O S A KHALID AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 43, KHATHA NO 28/1 & 28/2 THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 4. MR AZEEZULLA KHAN S/O AMANULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 39, KHATHA NO.1060, THANISANDRA VILLAGE K R PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
BANGALORE. 5. SMT ABIDA BEGUM W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
317
R/AT NO 197, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, TUBA LAYOUT THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 077. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIDHANASOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G SIMILARLY FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-G1; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.38919/2016:
BETWEEN 1. SMT HANUMAKKA W/O LATE KEMPANNA
318
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, BENGALURU-560 064. 2. SMT.K.R.LALITHA W/O K.RAJANNA, AGED 56 YEARS, R/AT SANJEEVINI, #15, SAMPIGE ROAD, 4TH CROSS, MALLESWARA, BENGALURU-560 003. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, SI.2 & 3 ARE AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AT BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTIUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION DT:18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE-A NOTIFIED AT
SL.NO.697 IN PAGE 36 IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE
319
SCHEDULE LAND OF SY.NO.11/10 OF JAKKUR TO AN EXTENT
OF 0.14 TUNTA SITUATE ON NORTH-WEST CORNER OF ENTIRE
LAND; AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.39001/2016: BETWEEN MRS. HAMEEDA SHARIFF W/O MR.FAYAZ SHERIFF, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.17, DAVIS HABITAT, DAVIS ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. DEAD BY LR' S NAZEEM BABU D/O.FAYAZ SHERIFF AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.10, 515 CROSS PILLANNA GARDEN IST STAGE BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE- 560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.C. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
320
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;) SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-E
DTD:18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS
UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.40151/2016: BETWEEN 1. P.S. POOVAMMA D/O LATE P.M.SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O NO.24, KURUMARADIKERE, CHITRADURGA TQ AND DIST-577 501. 2. SRIMATI PONNAMMA (SAMPI) W/O P.M.SUBBAIAH (SERIAL NO.6260863), AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, SINCE NOT HOLDING MEMORIES SHE IS REPRESENTED BY HER DAUGHTER PETITIONER NO.1 HEREIN ABOVE R/O NO.7, 5TH CROSS, ATHMANANDA COLONY, SULTAN PALYA, R.T.NAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 032. ...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
321
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, NEXT TO CAUVERY BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, NEAR BMTC BUS DEPOT DIESEL SHED ROAD, KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560 016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FOR ALLOTMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE ACQUISTION BY THE RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-F DTD:11.07.2016 AND FURTHER DIRECT TO ALOT THE ALTERNATIVE SIDE IN THE SAME LOCALITY OF SY.NO.97 OF RACHANAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE FOR THE SITE NO.119 MEASURING 50X30 AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.40240/2016: BETWEEN M/S KIRLOSKAR SYSTEMS LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S KIRLOSKAR ASEA LTD.,)
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 # 08, 7TH FLOOR EMBASSY STAR, 8 PALACE ROAD, VASANTNAGAR, BANGALORE - 52 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
322
MR. S. BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE K SATYANARAYANA. ...PETITONER (BY SRI. MAHESH S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (UDD) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 01. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK - WEST
BANGALORE - 20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER (NORTH). 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (NORTH) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK - WEST, BANGALORE - 20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AND TO EXCLUDE THE PETITIONER SAID PROPERTY FROM ACQUISITION AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.41753/2016:
BETWEEN SMT ANI P RAI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, W/O PURUSHOTHAM RAO,
323
R/AT NO.008 DS MAX SHELTON, NGEF LAYOUT MAIN ROAD, MALLATHALLI, BANGALORE-560056. ...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUNITHA H SINGH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. REPTD BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010)7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-N SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY; AND ETC., IN W.P.NO.44127/2016:
BETWEEN: M/S GRACE GARDEN APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION (A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER
324
THE KSR ACT) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GRACE GARDEN APARTMENTS 3RD CROSS, HENNUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 043 BY ITS PRESIDENT.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KP WEST, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KP WEST, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DEMAND THE PETITIONER ASSOCIATION TO SELL ITS LAND AT THE COMPENSATION DETERMINED BY ITS UNILATERALLY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.44146/2016: BETWEEN:
1. COLONEL K. RAMACHANDRAN S/O. LATE. KARUNAKARAN, AGE 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3/7, FIELD MARSHAL CARIAPPA COLONY, CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 001 2. V. N. SHAMSUNDAR S/O. V. S. NATARAJAN, AGE 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 189-H,
325
M.G. COLONY RAILWAY QUARTERS, OKALIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 023 3. MAJOR SADASHIVAN K A S/O. LATE. SHANMUGAN, AGE 68 YEARS, R/AT NO. W-7, OLD HAIG LINES, DEVLALI CAMP, DISTRICT NASIK, PINCODE: 422401 4. RAJEEV GOLLARAHALLI S/O. G. K. RAMAN, AGE 50 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4/3, 17TH CROSS, WEST PARK ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560055 5. JYOTHI SINGH W/O. LT. COLONEL MRIGENDRA SINGH, AGE 59 YEARS, R/AT M95, 7TH MAIN, SECTOR 10, JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 075 6. SHEELA SIMON D/O LATE. KOCHAMMA NAIR, AGE 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1456,SUSHANTH, FATIMA STREET, KAMANAHALLI JVV MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560084 7. MULKY DAMODAR KAMATH S/O. LATE. M. PURUSHOTHAM KAMATH, AGE 66 YEARS, R/AT NO. 139, 'UTTAM' AECS LAYOUT,
SANJAYANAGAR RMV II STAGE, BENGALURU - 560094
326
8. PRASHANTH V S/O. L. VENKOBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO. 17, VYSYA BANK COLONY, SARAKKI MAIN ROAD, J. P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560078 9. RAMESH BABU S/O. R. SONGUKRISHNASWAMY, AGE 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 138/123, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, M.S. RAMAIAH NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560094 10. DHRUVAKANTH B. SHENOY S/O. MR. T. B. G. SHENOY, AGE 52 YEARS, R/AT NO. 153/1, PURNIMA, AECS LAYOUT, D. RAJAGOPAL ROD, SANJAYNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094 11. ABHA PATHAK W/O. DR. PATHAK, AGE 38 YEARS, R/AT NO. 28, SHEETAL NAGAR, SHAHANOORWADI, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA- 4310012
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001
327
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, REVENUE BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - F) ISSUED BY
THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
ANNEXURE - G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 ANNEXURE - M ISSUED BY THE R-1 IS SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO SITE NO. 17, 50.51, 52, 57, 58, 59, 48, 49, 31, 15
BELONGING THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SYNO. 38/1, 38/2 ,
38/3, 38/4, 38/5 AND 39/3 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE,
K.R.PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.44246/2016: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. ALLAIYA
@ ALLAIA JEELANI W/O MR. TAHIR IMRAN D/O. SHABBER AHMED JEELANI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO.4/2 1ST CROSS, ANNIPURA OFF DOUBLE ROAD SUDHAMA NAGAR BENGALURU-560027
328
2. MR. MUSTAFA MOHIUDDIN JEELANI S/O SHABBER AHMED JEELANI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDENT OF NO.530 12TH CROSS, DOLLARS COLONY R.M.V 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560094
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BALARAJ A. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITHRA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX - J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.46319/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. R. B. SATHYANARAYANA SINGH S/O. LATE SRI. R. BYRAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.42, 10TH A CROSS, KAVI RAGHAVANKA ROAD, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 050. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH T. S., ADVOCATE)
329
AND: BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PAVITHRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO EXECUTE AND REGISTER THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF ANY RESIDENTIAL SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BENGALURU AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 47314/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BBMP WARD # 25, KRISHNARAJAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DIST BENGALURU - 560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJANNA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN, KURUMAPARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
330
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, 23.02.2004 AND 18.06.2014
AS AT ANNEX- A, B & C NOTIFIED AT SL.NO. 50 OF PAGE 108 OF
ANNEX - A IN OS FAR IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE LAND OF
SY.NO.22/1 OF K NARAYANAPURA TO AN EXTENT OF 1.23 ACRE
IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO. 47461/2016: BETWEEN: PRASANNA P. L. N. S/O. PUTTA REVANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1679, 6TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, HAMPINAGARA, BANGALORE-560 104. REPTD. BY ITS G.P.A. HOLDER, PUTTA REVANNA, S/O. LATE SIDDAIAH.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADINARAYAN, ADVOCATE)
331
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. REPT. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. M/S. TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.17, 1ST FLOOR YAMUNA BAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 001. REPT. BY ITS PRESIDENT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI.B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO
ALLOT THE SITE TO THE PETITIONER MEASURING 40' X 60'
FORMED IN SY.NO.17, 18. 19/1 & 31/1 OF VENKATESHPURA
AND SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TALUK BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF
THE PETITIONER WHICH ARE AT ANNEX - A & M AND ETC.
332
IN W.P.NO.51143/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. C. MAHESWARAPPA AGED 57 YEARS, SON OF SRI.CHENNAVEERAPPA,
NO.54, 5TH CROSS & 6TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-77
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
333
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITITON PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND SY.NO.31/1 GEDDALAHALLI
VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2914(ANNEXURE - L) IS ILLEGAL WITHOUT
JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON- EST AND HENCE IN -
OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51144/2016: BETWEEN: SMT G. B. RATHNAMMA AGED 56 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.B.SHIVALINGAPPA, NO.71,1ST MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT
334
DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1
GEDDAHALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE - H) IS ILLEGAL
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRATY AND NON-EST AND HENCE
IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
335
IN W.P.NO.51145/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. M. S. DEVAKI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.78, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/2, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J ISSUED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON- EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
336
IN W.P.NO.51147/2016: BETWEEN: SMT M. C. RUDRAMMA AGED 49 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.G.S.HALAPPA, NBO.55, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, GEDDALHALLI, K.NARAYANPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
337
IN W.P.NO.51352/2016: BETWEEN: MR. K. KUBENDRAN AGED 59 YEARS, SON OF MR. K. KALIMUTHU RESIDING AT NO.89 & 90 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. PAVITRA A. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDLAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
338
INCLUDED AT SL.NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX- H ISSUED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51353/2016: BETWEEN: SRI VAREED GEORGE AGED 46 YEARS SON OF C. V. GEORGE NO.65 2ND MAIN ROAD GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
339
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51355/2016: BETWEEN: SMT S. SAVARIAMMAL AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, W/O SRI A. LUCAS, NO.98, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
340
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51597/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. K. G. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. THIPPESWAMY, RESIDING AT NO.53, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
341
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51707/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI A. BALARAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE AROKIASWAMY NO.18, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077 2. SMT SALVIUS SUJATHA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS W/O MR. GIFT IMMANUEL RAJ NO.18, IST MAIN 2ND CROSS GEDDALAHALI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077 3. SRI MATHEWS MANOJ AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS S/O SRI A BALARAJ NO.18, 1ST MAIN 2NDCROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE-560077 ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
342
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-K) IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE
IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51730/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
343
2. SRI KANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 4. SRI GANGADHARAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ALL SONS OF LATE NARAYANAPPA RESIDING AT NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560 007
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
344
IN W.P.NO.51875 /2016: BETWEEN: SRI. E. SHANKARAPPA AGED 63 YEARS, SON OF ESHWARAPPA.S NO.81, IST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C.R. GOPALSWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
345
IN W.P.NO.51876 /2016: BETWEEN: SMT. ALICE MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O SRI VICTOR, NO.97, 2ND MAIN, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
346
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51877/2016: BETWEEN: SRI K. V. VENKATA REDDY AGED 65 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA, NO.70, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
347
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.51878/2016: BETWEEN: DR. RUMANA RIYAZ AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, WIFE OF DR. SHAHID AHMED SHAIKH, NO.80, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
348
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.52141/2016:
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHAFEEQ AHMED S/O LATE SRI.T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT, A.N. MANSION, 1ST FLOOR, NO.15,
7TH "A" CROSS, KANNAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KARNATAKA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEELOPMENT AUTHORITY MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
349
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - C AND DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-B IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED LAND BEARING SITE NO. 7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.52142/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. ATHEEQUE AHMED S/O. LATE. SRI. T.R. ABDUL SUBHAN SAB, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT A. N. MANSION, 1ST FLOOR, NO. 15, 7TH-A-CROSS, KANNAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 032
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKHIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE -560 001 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
350
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX - B AND DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - C IS RESPECT OF AFOREMENTIONED LAND BEARING SITE NO.7, IN SY.NO.34/8, SITUATED AT THUBA LAYOUT, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.52928/2016: BETWEEN: SRI DENNIS JACOB MAJOR, SON OF LT. SUNNY JACOB (RETD.) NO.20, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
351
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53240/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SONNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 2. SRI. D. C. KUMARA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAMMA, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 3. SRI D. R. SHIVANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE M. RAMAIAH, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036 4. SRI. A. MUNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAANJANAPPA
R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560 036
352
5. SRI T. N. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT TARABANAHALLI, H CROSS, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IN SO FAR AS
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.53525/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. VIJAYAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF SRI.RAVANNUI NAIR, NO.15, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
353
K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53526/2016: BETWEEN:
SMT. VIMALA AGED ABOUR 49 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI.B.S.DINESH KUMAR, NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
354
7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - J) IS
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST
AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
355
IN W.P.NO.53527/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. MARY KUTTY MAMMEN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O MR THOMAS MAMMEN NO.25, 1ST MAIN 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT (ANNEXURE - M) IS
356
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53670/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. LOURDU MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. FRANCIS, NO.91, 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
357
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54364/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S. SRIKANTA S/O LATE SRI SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED R/AT NO.307, 9TH 'A' CROSS, JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE-560 064 2. SMT. SAVITHRI W/O SRI. S. SRIKANTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SENIOR CITIZENSHIP NOT CLAIMED RESIDING AT NO.307, 9TH 'A' CROSS, JAKKUR-YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR VILLAGE, JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER SANKEY ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
358
SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 06.09.2016 AND 23.09.2016 PASSED BY THE R-3 AS PER ANNEXURE - A & B AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54790/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. KEMPANNA S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.30/3 AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE, SAHAKARANAGARA POST, BANGALORE-560 092
...PETITIONER (BY SMT. M. D. ANURADHA URS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REP BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001 4. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
359
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. I. G. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR RR2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO ACQUIRE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND GRANT REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55126/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. S. N. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA R/AT NO.27 SAMPIGEHALLI YELAHANKA HOBLI JAKKUR POST BANGALORE-560 064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE AND SRI. R. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
360
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-D ISSUED BY R-1 IN
SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55667/2016: BETWEEN: SRI S. G. JAYADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY, NO.82, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
361
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE - J] IS
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST
AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55737/2016: BETWEEN: 1. R. PARASHURAM REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O S. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, R/AT NO.A-146, ANUGRAHA NILAYA, 9TH CROSS, KHB COLONY, SARASWATHIPURAM, CHITRADURGA-577501 2. SAMPATH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, SON OF GANGAPPA, NO.246, 16TH BLOCK, SMIG-A, 4TH PHASE, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560064 3. SMT.ANURUDHA S M AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O SUBRAMANAYA SHARMA T.V., R/AT NO.344, 16TH A MAIN,
362
4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560041 4. K.G.POONACHA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O K.S.GANAPATHI R/AT UARTER NO.G.1114 4TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, CENTER TOWNSHIP, HAL, BANGALORE-570037 5. A.K.LOGANATHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O K.KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.2BM, 326, OMBR LAYOUT, BHUVANAGIRI, BANGALORE-560043 6. G.HARISH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O C.GOWDA CHITHAPPA R/AT NO.3087, 14TH B MAIN ROAD, 8TH 'C' CROSS ROAD, HAMPINAGAR, BANGALORE-560040 7. P.P.SATHYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE P.M.PEMMAIAH R/AT NO.321-8, (206/3A), DEVAKI NILAYA, 7TH B CROSS, 3RD MAIN, JAKKASANDRA, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560034 8. K.D.NANJE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDASHANAIAH R/AT NO.927, 1ST BLOCK, II STAGE, 2ND 'A' CROSS ROAD, BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE-560079 9. M.NANDISH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE D.C.MALLARADHYA
363
R/AT NO.20, 1ST CROSS ROAD, ANUBHAVANAGAR, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560072. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001
REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56022/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. MAJELLA THOMAS AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS WIFE OF SRI. SIBY XAVIER NO. 24, 1ST MAIN, 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
364
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- G] IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND
HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.56023/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. MAJELLA C. THOMAS AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI SIBY XAVIER
365
NO.24, 1ST MAIN 2ND & 3RD CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND
HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
366
IN W.P.NO.56971/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. P. SRINATH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O SRI C. PERIASWAMY, NO.85,1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEX- J] IS ILLEGAL,
367
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56972/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. FAYAZ KHAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O. SRI. YASEEN KHAN, NO. 48,2ND MAIN, 8TH CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
368
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57149/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. R. SHYLAJA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WIFE OF SRI. C.S. RAJENDRA NO. 38, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
369
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57151/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. NEELAMMA KUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O SRI K A KUTTAPPA, NO.9, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, GEDDALAHALLI, K NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
370
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.57709/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A APPANNA S/O LATE ANJIANAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS 2. SRI MUNEGOWDA S/O A. APPANNA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 3. SRI A. SATHISH S/O APPAIANNA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 4. SRI. R. ANAND S/O LATE A RAMESH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 5. SRI R HARISH S/O LATE A RAMESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA TOWN BANGALORE NORTH TALUK PIN - 560 032
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA
371
BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND
BEARING SY.NO.63/1 MEASURING 28 GUNTAS SITUATED AT
JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH
TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED
IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.03.2003 AND PART -III
NOTIFICATION AS PER ANNEXURE - C OF THE R-2 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 18.06.2014,
IN PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 380 NOTIFICATION DATED
08.12.2014, AS PER ANNEX - K HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION
27 OF BDA ACT AND; GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S
THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.57937/2016: BETWEEN: DR. M. T. RAJA REDDY S/O LATE MALLESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
372
RESIDING AT NO 602, 2ND MAIN, KALYAN NAGAR, 2ND BLOCK BANGALORE - 560043. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. CLIFTON D ROZARIO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDIAH ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020 3. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 [ PLACED AS ANNEXURE -W] INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER MEASURING 37 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.31/1, SITUATED AT CHELKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK AND ALL CONSEQUENT ACTIONS THERETO, INCLUDING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R-1 [PLACED AS ANNEXURE - X] AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58218/2016: BETWEEN:
SMT. ANITHA SURYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI M. SURYA KUMAR NO.27, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS,
373
GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- K IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND
HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
374
IN W.P.NO.58222/2016: BETWEEN: MR. SHAIK MAROOF NADEEM AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SON OF MR.MOHAMMED SHUJATHULLA NO.43, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILALGE K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B.M. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
375
IN W.P.NO.58734/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANITHA B. N. AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O. CHANNAPPA, R/AT NO. 20,12TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN,YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANGALORE 560050 2. V. S. CHINCHOLI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE. SANGRAMAPPA, NO. 69,SUGUMA LAYOUT, NYANAPPANAHALLI, BEGUR POST, BANGALORE - 560068 3. SHAMAIAH L., AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O. LATE. LAKSHMAIAH, R/AT NO. 106/2, 7TH CROSS ROAD, NANJA REDDY COLONY, H.A.L. POST, BANGALORE - 560017 4. SMT. S. SANGEETHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. K A SAHADEV RAO, R/AT 12/7-1, SRI. MOUNAGURU MATTA ROAD, THIMMAIAH GARDEN, DODDIGUNTE, COX TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 005 5. S T JAGANNATHA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O. S D THAMMANNA, R/AT NO. 17,
SRI. RANGADHAMA, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, SINGAPUR LAYOUT, VIDYARANDAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560097
376
6. SMT. SUMANGALA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, D/O. LATE. B G CHIKKAVENKATAIAH, R/AT 3977 A, 1ST FLOOR,3RD MAIN, 18TH CROSS, K.R. ROAD, K.S.K. II STAGE, BANGALORE- 560070 7. MANJUNATH R. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE. RATHNAM, R/AT NO. 68, 4TH CROSS, BRINDAVAN LAYOUT, VIJINAPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 016 8. SMT. ASHA D AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. DEVA RAO V, R/AT NO. 42, 1ST FLOOR, II MAIN, 2ND CROSS, M. N. BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560032 9. JAYARAMA H C AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. B V CHELUVARAYASWAMY, R/AT NO. 327, HONGELAKSHMI NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, VHBS LAYOUT, NEAR GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 040
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGLAORE 560001. REP BY ITS SECRETARY
377
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020
….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - M DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59166/2016: BETWEEN: SRI C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.64, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
378
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE- K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59168/2016: BETWEEN: SRI M. V. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. SRI. M. VENKATARAMANA REDDY, NO. 4, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
379
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59317/2016: BETWEEN: 1. V SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE B M VEERAIAH R/AT UTI, BAN RAC NO.119, 80 FT ROAD 7TH BLOCK, KORMANGALA BANGALORE-560 095 2. V SUNDAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE S V RAMAN NO.1758 3RD CROSS RAM MOHANPUAM SRIRAMPURAM POST BANGALORE-560 021 3. M TUKARAM NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE M NARAYAN NAYAK R/AT NO.18 1ST C MAIN 5TH D CROSS
380
CHOKKALAPPA LAYOUT KASTURINAGAR BANGALORE-560 043 4. SRINIVASAN T V AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE T M VAIKUNTAPPA R/AT 2235 4TH MAIN ROAD 4TH CROSS ROAD RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE BANGALORE-560 040 5. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA N AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS S/O LATE NANJAPPA R/AT NO.8 SHANTHISADANA 1ST FLOOR 4TH MAIN SHIVANAGARA BANGALORE-560 010 6. K S CHANDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS D/O LATE SIDDAIAH R/AT NO.42 11TH CORSS 2ND MAIN PRASHANTH NAGAR BANGALORE-560 040 7. S R GOPALACHAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS S/O LATE S M RAMACHANDRACHAR R/AT NO.63, 4TH MAIN SARVABHOUMA NAGAR CHIKKALASANDRA BANGALORE-560 061
8. V CHANDRASEKARAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE G VENKATESAN R/AT NO.162 BEML LAYOUT
381
KAMALANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079 9. T K VALSALAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE C ACHUTHAN R/AT NO.A , 422 II STAGE,3RD PHASE 2ND B CROSS ROAD 5TH MAIN DOMLUR VILLAGE BANGALORE-560 071 10. JAVANT G BHATIA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS S/O LATE GOVINDJI N BHATIA R/AT NO.S007 KRISHNA GREEN APARTMENT KRISHNA TEMPLE ROAD DODDABOMMASANDRA BANGALORE-560 097 11. J V GURU MURTHY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS S/O LATE J VENKATARAYAPPA R/AT NO.11, 8TH CROSS BASAVESHWARALAYOUT BEML III STAGE RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BANGALORE-560 098
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVLEOPMENT M S BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPTD.BY ITS COMMISSIONER
382
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -P DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59793/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M LEO S/O C MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT H.A. FARM, MARIYANNA PALYA, BANGALORE-560024 2. M RAVINDRA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O C MARIYAPPA, R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA, BENGALURU-560024 3. M ANTHONY REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O C MARIYAPPA, R/AT H.A.FARM,MARIYANNA PALYA, BENGALURU-560024
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHUPATHY T N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001
383
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 REP BY ITS SOMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HULIGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARRE THAT THE NOTICE DATED 06.09.2016 VIDE ANNEX-E ISSUED BY THE R-2 IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME AND ETC IN W.P.NO.60064/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. NARAYANAMMA WIFE OF LATE GUNDU RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT DOOR NO 22, 1ST FLOOR BALAJI LAYOUT R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560042
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2 . THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 2 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 )
384
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH EXECUTE ABSOLUTE SALE
DEEDS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE
PROCEEDINGS DATED 04.07.2016 [VIDE ANNEXURE -G TO K]
FOR ALLOTMENT OF 40% OF THE DEVELOPED AREA IN TERMS
OF GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 18.03.2011 [ANNEXURE - E]
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.63172/2016: BETWEEN: 1. P K MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, SON OF LATE N.P. MENON, RESIDENT OF NO.503, USHAKIRAN APARTMENTS, 25, HAUDIN ROAD, ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560042. 2. HARIKRISHNAN RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF K. RAMACHANDRAN, RESIDINT OF LAKSHMY SADANAM, M G KAVU, TRICHUR, KERALA-680581. 3. H.N. VIJAYAN AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, SON OF SRI. H.B. NANJAN, R/AT NO.14, SRIRAM NAGAR, THUDIYALUR, COIMBATORE-641101.
4. SMT. ASHA J SATISH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI. J. SATISH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF NO. 200, SUJAN 2ND CROSS, RAMGOPAL LAYOUT,
385
SUBBANAPALYA, BANSWADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560044.
5. SMT. C. BHAVANI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WIFE OF V K CHANDRASEKHARAN, RESIDENT OF 26/46, PERUMAL KOIL GARDEN STREET SOWCARPET
CHENNAI-600 079.
6. SMT. KAMLESH AHMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, WIFE OF FAROOQ AHMED, RESIDENT OF NO.304, 4TH CROSS. 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 043.
7. SMT. SHEILA SARIN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS WIFE OF LATE CAPT. V.P.S SARIN, RESIDENT OF NO.30, DEFENCE COLONY, IIND MAIN, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE-560038.
8. P.K. PADMANABHAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SON OF LATE P.S. KUPPUSWAMY IYER RESIDENT OF AT NO.334, 17TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN ROAD, INDIRANAGAR IIND STAGE, BANGALORE 560 038.
9. KENNETH PINTO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SON OF P F PINTO, RESIDENT OF DELPHI II 704 ACROPOLIS 20, HOSUR ROAD,
BANGALORE 560 029. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)
386
AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRNAT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.63308/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUSTAQ AHMED A.S. S/O. A.A. SHAFIULLA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, C/O. # 195, 4TH CROSS, RASHADNAGAR, ARABI COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560 045. 2. SRI. MUNEEB AHMED TIRUPATTUR S/O. T. MOHAMMAD GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
C/O. #195, 4TH CROSS, RASHADNAGAR, ARABI COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45.
387
3. SRI. NAJMA SULTHANA W/O. SRI. MOHAMMAD ILYYAS, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. #15, 6TH CROSS, K.G. HALLI, BANGALORE-45. 4. SRI. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL S/O. ABDUL RAZACK, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. #78, III MAIN, MUNIRAMMA BLOCK, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATISH M. DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN THE
RESPONDENTS FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONERS FROM
THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES WITHOUT FOLLOWING
THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC.
388
IN W.P.NO.64534/2016: BETWEEN: SRI K. PARTHASARATHY S/O SRI K SUBBARAO AGD ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO 150, 1ST FLOOR, 16TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI I STAGE, II BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560050
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.N. VISHWANATHA, ALONG WITH SRI. T.N. RAMESH, ADVOCATES) AND: THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560001. ….RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADV) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT /NOTICE DATED 09.08.2016 VIDE ANNEX-H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.64705/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.43, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE)
389
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGLAORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEXURE- J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN - OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.65118/2016: BETWEEN: 1. APPAIANNA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. NARAYANA SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS 3. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
390
4. KRISHNAPPA SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS DAUGHTER YASHODA 5. MUNISONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 6. ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 7. LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ALL ARE CHILDREN OF LATE CHIKKAPPAIAH, RESIDING AT THANISANDRA K. R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. Y. S. H. REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MULTI STORED BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX -D DATED 18.06.2014 AND ETC.
391
IN W.P.NO.65121/2016: BETWEEN: SRI H. JAIMUNI S/O LATE HANUMATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.96 PRAKRUTHI LAYOUT 1ST MAIN,1ST CROSS KALYAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 043
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY P. M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, T. CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST T. CHOWDIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020
….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME KNOWN AS 'ARKAVATHI LAYOUT' IN RESPECT OF LAND
BEARING SY.NO.94/9 MEASURING 1 ACRE 8 GUNTAS AND 2 GUNTAS KARAB SITUATED THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI , BANGALORE EAST TALUK, NOTIFIED BY PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 AND PART-III NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX - E OF THE
392
R-2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 23.02.2004, PART III VIDE BEARING NO. 274, NOTIFICATION VIDE ANNEX-F, FURTHER FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, VIDE ANNEX -G HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION 27 OF BDA ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.182/2017: BETWEEN: 1. T M DILIP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS SON OF LATE E. U. SHEKAR MENON RESIDENT OF NO.NO.F6 KRISHNA HEAVEN, N.R.I LAYOUT KALKERE RAMAMURTHY NAGAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 043 2. HARISH C. DHINGRA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS SON OF LATE D. N. DHINGRA RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.2, T-2 SHIVAJIMANIRAM APARTMENTS GANDHIMANDAPAM ROAD KOTTURPURAM CHENNAI-600085 3. MANIKKOTHE MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF P M R NAMBIAR RESIDENT OF KOYA MANGALAM OTTA PALAM-1 PALGHAT DISTRICT KERALA-679 101
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001
393
2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ARKAVATHY LAYOUT RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO
REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN
THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF
IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE
GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN
REASONABLE TIME AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.815/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. P.G. SREENATH S/O. LATE. P R GOPALAKRISHNA IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO. 572ND CROSS, UTI BANK RAC, 80 FEET ROAD, III PHASE, 4TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560085
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MURALIDHAR H.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPOMENT,
394
M.S. BUILDING, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 TO REGISTER AND PUT THE PETITIONER IN [PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF SITE NO. BK -90, MEASURING 9X12 METERS AT ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 18TH BLOCK, BENGALURU, IN LIEU OF SITE NO. 748, WHICH WAS ALLOTED AND REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX - A AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2066/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. ASHWATHAMMA W/O LATE SRI. PILLARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.103 CHOWDAPPA LAYOUT K. NARAYANAPURA RAOD S. R. K. NAGAR POST THANISANDRA BENGALURU-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURU PRASAD A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SCRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORYED BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST
395
GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 4. THE SPECIAL LAND AQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020 5. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST GUTTAHALLI BENGALURU-560020
….RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX - A ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS UNDER SEC. 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT ACT 1976 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3178/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT C. M. CHANDRAKALA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O SRI K. PRAKASH, R/AT 483, 5TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, 4TH STAGE, BEML LAYOUT,
396
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 098. 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA B. AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O LATE BODAPPA, R/AT NO. 43, AGS LAYOUT, M.S.R NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 054. 3. SMT. K. VASANTHA KUMARI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O K.V. ANANTHA, R/AT NO. 1019, GROUND FLOOR, 10TH MAIN ROAD, II STAGE, WEST OF CARD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 086. 4. S. P. NATARAJ AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O J. T. PUTTASWAMY, R/AT NO. 7/B, KANNAN NILAYA, 5TH CROSS ROAD, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 023. 5. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, R/AT NO. 1214, 11TH B CROSS, II STAGE, WEST OF CORD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 086. 6. M.S. KUMAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O M.S.SATYANARAYANA, R/AT NO. 139, 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, III PHASE, 6TH BLOCK,
BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE - 560 085. 7. H. BASAVARAJ GOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
397
S/O CHANNANA GOWDA, R/AT NO.B-291, 2ND 'A' MAIN, 12TH WARD, AYYAPPA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 036. 8. M NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, R/AT NO.G-782, 6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN CTS, HAL COLONY, MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 037. 9. SMT. B.S. KAMALU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O S.B.KRISHNA RAO, R/AT NO.90, 4TH BLOCK, TYAGARAJA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 028. 10. S. CHANDRASHEKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SIDDARAMUJI RAO, R/AT KAMMANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560 084.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 020 REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
398
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -N DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.4293/2017: BETWEEN: SHRI CHAND PASHA S/O MOHAMMED MASTAN SAHIB, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4, SHANTHAVEERAPPA LANE, CHICKPET CROSS, BANGALORE - 560 052
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020, 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
399
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE B TO G PROPERTIES BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTIUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE - A PROPERTY FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNEX-L R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX - P R-1 TO HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE -B TO G PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.4400/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SRI R. NARAYANA SWAMY S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
2. SRI PRAKASH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
3. SRI. SURESH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SL.NO.1 TO 3 RESIDING AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 4. SRI M. NARASIMHAIAH S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.182, HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, HUNASAMARANAHALLI POST, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
400
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITIION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 UNDER
SEC.17(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-G ISSUED BY R-2 AND
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 UNDER
SEC.19(1) OF BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-H ISSUED BY R-1 AND RE-
MODIFIED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014, ISSUED BY R-1
U/S 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT, VIDE ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN SO
FAR AS THE PETITIONERS PROPERTIES BEARING SY.NO.60/1
MEASURING 34 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.56/8, MEASURING 2
GUNTAS OF K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK, IS CONCERNED AS LAPSED IN TERMS
OF SEC. 25(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND
TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND
RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.
401
IN W.P.NO.4511/2017: BETWEEN: SRI C. RAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKATHIMMAIAH, R/AT NO.31/A, 18TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 053
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO
CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 VIDE ANNEX - D AND TO
ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE
SCHEME AND ETC.
402
IN W.P.NO.5036/2017: BETWEEN: SRI T. S. SATHYANARAYAN S/O SUNDARA RAJAN, AGED 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.765, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 'A' BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560010
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KRNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT. MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE
ANNEX-M, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONERS
PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
403
IN W.P.NO.5037/2017: BETWEEN: SRI T. S. RADHIKA W/O P. K. RAMAMURTHY AGED 60 YEARS R/AT NO.1366, KAVITHA JAIN ROAD GIRINAGAR, 2ND PHASE BSK 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560085
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUE BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-J, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
404
IN W.P.NO.5073/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. D. LALI VERGHESE W/O VERGHESE AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3/1 AND 4/3 AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K. R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS, PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 BY THE R-2 (ANNEXURE -E) AND NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT,
1976[ANNEXURE-F] HAVE LAPSED, IN SO FAR THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY COMPRISED IN SY NO. 3/1 AND 4/3 OF AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
405
IN W.P.NO.5207/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. RADHA W/O MR M. THIMME GOWDA AGED 56 YEARS NO.32,1ST MAIN 3RD CROSS,GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
406
IN W.P.NO.5208/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. L. B. MUNILAKSHMAMMA AGEDA BOUT 45 YEARS WIFE OF SRI VENKATESH NO.74 2ND MAIN GEDDALAHALLI K NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,
407
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5213/2017: BETWEEN: SMT PRABHA RAJAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O SRI. S.M. RAJAN NO.74, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL,
408
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5214/2017: BETWEEN SMT. E. KOUSALYA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE S.KANNAIAH, NO.113, 1ST MAIN, 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
409
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5218/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. SHARATH BABU S/O MR. K. KAMALANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 2. MRS. KAVITHA PRIYADARSHINI W/O MR. K. SHARATH BABU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BOTH AT NO.41, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
410
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5221/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. LOURDU MARY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O SRI. FRANCIS, NO.7, 2ND MAIN, 1ST CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
411
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5301/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT JOYCE SUNDER W/O MR J. SUNDER SINGH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO. 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077 2. SRI DEEPAK J. SUNDER S/O MR J SUNDER SINGH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9, KHATA NO 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077 3. SMT REBECCA MONISHA SUNDER W/O JAWAHAR BYRAN RAJEEVA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO 619 & 620,
AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077
412
4. SMT MOLLY MCINTYRE W/O E M MCINTYRE AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT PROPERTY NO 8 & 9 KHATA NO 619 & 620, AMANI BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. S. BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
SCHEME AND ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE
RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION
DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976, BY THE
R-2 VIDE ANNEX-E AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 1976 VIDE ANNEX-F, HAVE LAPSED,
IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
SCHEDULED COMPRISED IN SY.NO.3/1 AND 4/3 OF AMANI
413
BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.5593/2017: BETWEEN: MR. T CHANDRASHEKAR S/O M.THIRUVENKATASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.27, 8TH CROSS, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. PAVITHRA A RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER INSTITUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNEX-E
414
AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-F NOTIFIED FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5936/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. C. MANJULA W/O V L N MURTHY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.4/1, SHARADH NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS BASAVESHWAR LAYOUT NAGASHETTYHALLI BANGALORE-560094 2. SMT B. SHAHIKALA W/O H. P. NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/A NO.50, 8TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, 2ND BLOCK TALAKAVERI NAGAR AMRUTHALLI BANGALORE-560092 3. SMT V KALAVATHI W/O S VINAYAK AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A NO.90, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS KALYAN NAGAR NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-560072 4. BHANUMATHI N D/O T N NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.84, B G S LAYOUT NEAR DOUBLE ROAD JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064
5. S. KRISHNA PRASAD S/O LATE S SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.8, "YASHASVI"
415
13TH MAIN, 16TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560055 6. M RAM MOHAN S/O A NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A NO.92, 4TH MAIN SANJAY NAGAR BANGALORE-560094 7. SMT K. SUMA D/O VASUDEVAMAYYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A NO.4267, SHANTI NIVAS SUBRAMANYA NAGARA BANGALORE-560021 8. SMT UMA L RAO D/O T L RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/A NO.92 4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT SANJAY NAGAR BANGALORE-560094 9. K. SURYANARAYANA MAYYA S/O VASUDEVA MAYYA R/A NO.92 4TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT SANJAY NAGARA BANGALORE-560094 10. H. S. RUKHMINI W/O S. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.157, F-01 SRI. NAJUDESHWARA RESIDENCY BEML 4TH STAGE DOUBLE ROAD R R NAGAR BANGALORE-560098
11. SMT. KAMALA SHANKAR W/O P N SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.252, PALACE LOWER ARCHARD
416
SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORRE-560080 12. HIDAYATULLA KHAN S/O AHAMEDULLA KHAN MAJOR 1ST CROSS, KALISIPALYA NEW EXTENSION BANGALORE-560002 13. SMT B. K. JAGADAMBA D/O B K BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A NO.504/1 4TH MAIN ROAD, KENGERI UPANAGARA BANGALORE-560060 14. MADHU SHREE C. R. W/O C R RAVINDRA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO.107, SAVERIN PARK APARTMENT BUILDING, NO.56 K. R. NAGAR BANGLAORE-560004 15. R SRINIVASAIAH S/O LATE RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.55 6TH MAIN, 40TH CROSS 5TH BLOCK,JAYANAGAR BANGALORE-11 16. SHANKAR NARAYAN S/O LATE NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.389/7 METRO LAYOUT NAYANDAHALLI BANGALORE-560039
17. K V CHINANNA S/O LATE VENKAT KRISHNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NO.50, HANUMA NILAYA
417
5TH CROSS, K P AGRAHARA MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560023 18. R. CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O LATE D.M. RAMASWAMY AGE 58 YEARS, NO.25, SOUTH END ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE- 560 004 19. K. SRINIVAS S/O LATE K. NARAYAN RAO AGED 58 YEARS NO.18/2, ISEC CAMPUS, NAGARBHAVI POST, BANGALORE 560 072. 20. N.S. VENKATANARAYANAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGE 46 YEARS, NO.106, VYSHNAVI, 2ND MAIN, BEST COUNTY 2, HESSARGHATA MAIN ROAD, CHIKK ABETTAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 097 REPRESENTED BY G.P.A. HOLDER N. MURALI 21. N.R. CHANDRA SHEKAR S/O LATE RUDRAPPA AGE 71 YEARS, NO.408, 22ND MAIN J.P. NAGARA 2ND STAGE, MYSORE - 08 22. SMT. B. KAMALAKSHI W/O C.R. CHANDRANNA AGE MAJOR NO.204/B, 6TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS,
3RD BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 011. 23. FAROOQ MUNAVAR S/O LATE PEER MUNAVAR
418
AGED 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.46, 1ST FLOOR, ST. THOMAS ROAD, KACHARKANAHALLI, BANGALORE- 560 087. 24. CHITLUR NAGARAJ DILEEP S/O C.S. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.397, 24TH B CROSS, BANASHANKRI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE . 25. D.M. PARVATHAMMA D/O T.B. RAJSHEKAR MAJOR NO.676, 4TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 086. 26. D.M. NAGAMANI W/O D.T. SHIVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO.91, BINNY LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 040. 27. M.P. KEMPAIAH S/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED 82 YEARS NO.558, D BLOCK, 1ST STAGE,J.P. NAGAR MYSORE- 08. 28. INDU PRASAD W/O B.S. SHIV PRASAD AGED 47 YEARS, NO.69, 5TH CROSS, BAPUJI LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040.
29. R. GOVIND RAJAN S/O A. RAJGOPALA BHATA, AGED 48 YEARS REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER
419
R. GOPAL KRISHNA NO.54, GROUND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, SAI GARDEN VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 097. 30. N.S. RAVIKIRAN S/O NAMARANGAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.40/8, PATTANKAR LAYOUT, 13TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. M. HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE 560 01 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH HALL, BANGALORE - 560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGLAORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH HALL, BANGALORE- 560020 4. M/S TALACAUVERY HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.12/3A, NANDAGOKULA, YAMUNABAI ROAD, MADHAVANAGAR BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. CHITHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
420
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEX-L IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY CONCERNED OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.6637/2017: BETWEEN: SRI HARIRAJAN C S/O LATE CHINNATHAMBI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, #J-175, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHAPURAM, SRIRAMPURAM, BENGALOORU-560021.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERABHADRAIAH M. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALOORU-560020. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALOORU-560001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOTMENT OF AN ALTERNATIVE SITE BEARING NO.6/A, MEASURING 30X40 FEET, 3RD STAGE, III PHASE, 6TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR
OF THE PETITIONER INSTEAD OF SITE BEARING NO. 1458, MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, 11TH BLOCK, BENGALURU AND ETC.
421
IN W.P.NO.6998/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. V. M. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE MARGABANDHU AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS R/A NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION BANGALORE-560080 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER
THE REPORT OF R-3 AT ANNEX - C AND TO ALLOT AN
ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE SCHEME AND
ETC
422
IN W.P.NO.6999/2017: BETWEEN: SRI GOWRISHANKAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. SUBRAMANYA, R/AT NO. 1971, 4TH CROSS, 28TH MAIN, JP NAGAR, 2ND PHASE, BANGALORE 560078
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. VIKRAM ADITYA HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO
CONSIDER THE REPORT OF THE R-3 AT ANNEX - D AND TO
ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE
SCHEME AND ETC.
423
IN W.P.NO.7000/2017: BETWEEN: SRI K SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O V.M. KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT NO.86/33, 8TH MAIN, RAJAMAHAL VILAS EXTENSION, BANGALORE 560 080.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER
THE REPORT OF R-3 AT ANNEX - C AND TO ALLOT AN
ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE SCHEME AND
ETC.
424
IN W.P.NO.7001/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. ANNAPOORNI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O LATE V M DORAISWAMY, R/AT NO.227, BASAVANAPURA ROAD, DEVASANDRA, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE-560036
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 TO CONSIDER
THE REPORT OF R-3 AT ANNEX - C AND TO ALLOT AN
ALTERNATE SITE TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE SCHEME AND
ETC.
425
IN W.P.NO.10503/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. B. ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE BACHANNA R/AT NO.21 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THAT THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS
ANNEXURE-J IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS
CONCERNED AND ETC.
426
IN W.P.NO.10504/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2 . SRI SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS BOTH ARE SONS OF LATE MUNIANJANAPPA R/AT NO.21 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE KOTHANUR POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER PALACE ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PALACE ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-506 020
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
427
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-K IN SO FAR AS
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.11782/2017: BETWEEN: 1 . M. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 2 . M. SHIVASHANKAR
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
3 . NARASIMHAIAH
S/O LATE DODDAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
4 . KRISHNA MURTHY
S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
5 . ANJANAPPA
S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
6 . RAVI KUMAR
S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.18 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS S.K. GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BENGALURU - 560 046.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SUNDARESH H. C., ADVOCATE)
428
AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2 . THE COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.
3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE
THAT THE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY NO.1/2
MEASURING 8 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, PURSUANT TO
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX-B AND C ISSUED BY
R-2 AND R-1 RESPECTIVELY SO FOR AS IT RELATES TO
PETITIONERS PROPERTY IS CONCERN HAS BEEN LAPSED
UNDER SEC.24(2) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND
TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATIONS AND
RESETTLEMENT ACT.
429
IN W.P.NO.12547/2017: BETWEEN: MR. HANUMAIAH S/O LATE MUISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.2/2, JAKKUR LAKE ROAD JAKKUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 064.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 1 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2 . THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DATED: 27.01.2017 ISSUED BY R-3 AT ANNEX-L
AND TO DECLARE THAT THE SAID LAND FALLS WITHIN THE
PARAMETER 2 AND 6 OF THE BANDU RAMASWAMY CASE AND
CONSEQUENTLY, QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED:
18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE
PETITIONER'S ABOVE SAID LAND AND ETC.
430
IN W.P.NO.13456/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. S.N. GAYATHRI DEVI W/O SHRI. K.S. RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 50 YE ARS R/AT SNS HOUSE, NO.1076 2ND FLOOR, 23RD MAIN ROAD 11TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT IST SECTOR, BENGALURU - 560 102.
..PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2 . THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
3 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. 4 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R4; SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
431
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED:16.02.2013 AND 05.09.2013 AS ANNEX-P & Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY. IN W.P.NO.14238/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. B. DRAKSHAYANI W/O G.S. THAMMAIAH GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.61,1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
432
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY. NO.31, GEDDAKAGAKKU VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED:18.06.2014 ISSUE BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-J ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW.
IN W.P.NO.14626/2017:
BETWEEN:
SRI. FRANCIS AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O CHINNAPPA NO.45, 2ND MAIN ROAD 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST
BANGALORE - 560 077. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
433
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-L) IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14627/2017: BETWEEN: DR. G. DEVAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SON OF LATE L. GOVINDARAJ NO.4221, "DIYA" 11TH MAIN 3RD CROSS, J BLOCK KANAKADASANAGAR, MYSORE - 570 022.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAYKUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
434
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW ISSUED BY R-1. IN W.P.NO.14628/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. GEORGE. C S/O CHOWRI RAJ AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS NO.92, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
435
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14629/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE A. DORAISWAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BYITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
436
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNEXURE-G) IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14630/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE A. DORAISAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
437
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14631/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY NO.55, 13TH MAIN J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 086.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2 . FBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3 . THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST0 BANGALORE -560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
438
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ANNEX-G IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW. IN W.P.NO.14632/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SON OF LATE A. DORAISAMY, NO.55, 13TH MAIN, J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 086.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.M. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
439
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - G IS
ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST
AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.14670/2017: BETWEEN; SRI D. KARUNAKARAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O LATE A DORAISAMY, NO.55, 13TH MAIN, J.C.NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 086.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
440
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14868/2017: BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VARSHA RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O SRI RAGHAVENDRA, R/AT 7022, SHOBA CHRYSAN THEMUM THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 077. 2. YOGENDRA NAKRE AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE APPANNA POOJARY, R/AT NO.91, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, PAI LAYOUT, OLD MADRAS ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. CHALUVARAYA SWAMY R N AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH R K., R/AT NO.140, 2ND MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, HBR LAYOUT,KALYANAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 043. 4. D.A. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
441
S/O D.ANANDARAM, R/AT NO.957, ANJANADRI, 12TH CROSS ROAD, 35TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. 5. KHAMER AHMED CHETTANAI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O ABDUL MALIK CHETTANAI, R/AT NO.308, III B MAIN, KASTURINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 016. 6. VITTALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O BADIYA SHETTY, R/AT OLD NO.4, NEW NO.18, LALABAHADUR SASTRY NAGAR, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038. 7. SRIKANTA BABU K. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O SRI A KRISHNAIAH SHETTY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT QUARTERS, MAGADI ROAD KHB COLONY, BANGALORE - 560 079. 8. C.V. GANAPATHY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O LATE C.M.UTAHAIAH, R/AT NO.G-46, OLD TOWNSHIP, HAL COLONY, VIMANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 017. 9. K. VENKATACHALAPATHY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O K.V.KRISHNAIAHSETTY, R/AT NO.261, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010. 10. SMT. ANUSUYADEVI
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMASUBBAIAH SHETTY, R/AT NO.281, SUPRABHA, 10TH MAIN, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 019.
442
11. SMT. C.S. LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, W/O C. VENKATACHARYULU, R/AT FLAT NO.201, SAMHITA RESIDENCY, PAI LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BENNIGANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 016.
12. SMT. L.BABY NANDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O SRI R.R.SHINDE, R/AT V.B.R./HSR GRAND, FLAT NO.009, NO.3, OPP GRAND STORES, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR MAIN ROAD DODDA BANASWADI, BANGALORE - 560 043.
13. K. SANNA THIPPAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE JAMMA GOPAL KAMAIAH, C/O PALAIAH, R/AT G.867, 10TH CROSS, CTS HAL COLONY, MARATHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 037.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPT BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
443
SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE - Q DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15038/2017: BETWEEN: SRI RAMADASS G., S/O GOVINDASAMY K, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.30, IST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M AJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
444
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15588/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. YASHODA.G AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O SRI.K.T.SUBRAMANYA, R/AT NO.217, 4TH CROSS ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, KHB COLONY, BANGALORE-560095. 2. SUDHENDRA ROA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE PANDURANGA RAO, R/AT NO.17/2, SRI RENUKA NILAYA, SLN TEMPLE ROAD, MUNNE KOLAR, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560037. 3. SMT Y. SAROJAMMA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, W/O Y.SRINIVASACHAR, R/AT NO.139/3, 8TH CROSS ROAD, GOVINDARAJANAGAR, BANGALORE-560040. 4. HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, S/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH, R/AT NO.1890, AATHMEEYA, 20TH MAIN ROAD, 20TH B CROSS, M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR,
BANGALORE-560040. 5. SUNIL M MATHAD AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O MAHADEV MATHAD,
445
R/AT NO.29, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, 9TH A CROSS, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAXMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. 6. A. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE A ARMUGAM, R/AT NO.17, SULTAN G GUNTA ROAD, M.NO.4TH STREET, BANGALORE-560051. 7. SRI C. N. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O LATE C.A.NARASHIMAMURTHY, R/AT NO.724/31, 2ND MAIN ROAD, D BLOCK, II STAGE, RAJAJINGAR, BANGALORE-560010. 8. J. GOVARDHAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE JAYACHIKKANNA REDDY, R/AT NO.19, CHINMAYA NILAYA, GREEN MEDOSA LAYOUT, KEREGUDDARAHALLI, CHIKKABANAVARA POST, BANGALORE-560090. 9. SMT. P. SUDHA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O PERMANANDA SRINIVAS, R/AT L-77/3, II FLOOR, 4TH MAIN, L.N.PURAM, BANGALORE-560021. 10. D. J. JAYARAMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O JAVARAIAH, R/AT NO.138/A, KIOCL TOWNSHIP, KAVOOR, MANGALORE-575015,
BANGALORE-560020. 11. YARRAPPA M V AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O CHINNAVENKATARAYAPPA,
446
R/AT NO.34, GARDEN VILAS, MARUTHI NAGAR, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560072.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001. REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020, REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-P DATED 18.06.2014, ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.18427/2017:
BETWEEN:
LEONARD D COSTA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE. WELLINGTON D'COSTA,
R/O. 16, SAGAR, CHS, SOUTH STREET, DONA PAULA, GOA - 403 004. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)
447
AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER (ARKAVATHI LAYOUT), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJARAM S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 34 NEW HOUSE LIST KHATA NO. 50/34 MEASURING 50X80 SITUATED AT THANISANDRA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.21361/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. D. P. SOMAIAH S/O D K PONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.247,1ST 'E' MAIN SHIVANAGAR,RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. T. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020
448
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO. 117, SITUATED AT ARKAVATI LAYOUT, BLOCK -VII, BANGALORE, MEASURING 9X12 METERS AND COMPLETE THE PROCESS OF REGISTRATION FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24061/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. S. ROY MATHEW S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS NO.84, IST MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
449
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE [ANNEXURE - H] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24065/2017: BETWEEN: SRI S. ROY MATHEW S/O DR. JOHN MATHEW AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS NO.84, IST MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
450
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - H IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24506/2017: BETWEEN: SRI SHIVALINGIAH H. G AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, SON OF LATE GANGAIAH NO.18, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
451
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24508/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. R. HOMBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SON OF RAMAIAH NO.13 B, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
452
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-K IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.24509/2017: BETWEEN: SMT KAVITHA SOMASUNDARAM WIFE OF SOMASUNDARAM AGED 45 YEARS, NO.29, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
453
BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.25120/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. LINGANNA SON OF SRI PACHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 34, 2 B CROSS ROAD NEAR VIDYAPEETA CIRCLE BANK COLONY TYAGARAJANAGARA BANGALORE - 560028
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
454
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 3 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS ON THE FILE OF R-1 IN THE MATTER OF ALLOTMENT AND EXECUTION OF SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO. RH-ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, BLOCK NO.11, AS PER CORRECT DIMENSION REPORT DATED 25.02.2016 VIDE ANNEX - L AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26455/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. GEETHA BAI W/O. SHRI R. SHIVAJI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT NO.240/6 12 D. T. EXTENSION K. G. NAGAR BENGALURU-560 019
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD
455
KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 & 3 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNX-N & P RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26456/2017: BETWEEN: DR P. CHANDRA SHEKAR REDDY S/O LATE P. SANNABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO. 141, UPSTAIRS 2ND MAIN, AGS COLONY, ANAND NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 024.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
456
CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEX-K AND L RESPECTIVELY SUBMITTED THROUGH HIS SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26457/2017: BETWEEN: SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.38, RACHENAHALLI, DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
457
CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP BY UNDER SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R4; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26458/2017: BETWEEN SHRI C. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO. 38, RACHENAHALLI, DR. SHIVARAM NAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560 077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
458
BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.28359/2017: BETWEEN: SANJAY KUMAR S/O S. P. GOEL AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.803 TOWER 3, BESTECH PARKVIEW RESIDENCY SECTOR 66, MOHALI PUNJAB-160062
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD
459
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (ARKAVATHY LAYOUT) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO.89, HOUSE LIST KHATA NO. 141/89 MEASURING 30X40 SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT OT REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONER WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.30485/2017: BETWEEN: 1. N. ASHOK AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. S. NARAYANASWAMY, R/AT NO. 197, 7TH MAIN ROAD, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BSK 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560050 2. B. R. GOVINDA RAJU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. B K RAMA RAJU, R/AT NO. 282, SAPTHAGIRI, 3RD-A-MAIN A-BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560095 3. MOHAMMED MUNIRUDDIN AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
460
S/O.MOHAMMED HISAMUDDIN, R/AT NO. 2-1-40/1, BESIDE JAIL ANDOROON, QILA RAICHUR, RAICHUR- 584101 4. K. KUMARASWAMY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O. K. KUPPASWAMY, R/AT NO. 1, DICKENSON ROAD, BENGALURU 560042 5. KANDAGAL B. A. AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. AMIRABI, R/AT NO. 5, 9, KARNATAKA BATTALION, NCC, MARKETED BUILDING, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560052 6. V. SIVASANKARAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. VELAYUDHAN, R/AT NO. 74, RANDAPPA COLONY, BYAPPANAHALLI EXTN, INDIRANAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560038 7. SRI. C A ANJANEYALU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. LATE. C ADINARAYAN, R/AT NO. 6, D V APPARAO LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU- 560016 8. M. T. DHEERENDRACHAR AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. M. TRIVIKARAMACHAR,
R/AT NO. 313,2ND-A-CROSS, 1ST PHASE ,GIRINAGAR, VHB COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560085
461
9. P. RAJASHEKARAN NAIR AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O. N. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, 6TH CROSS, 6TH MN, DOMLURU LAYOUT, BENGALURU- 560071 10. A. M. MUDDAHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. MUDDAHANUMAIAH, R/AT NO. 352, 2ND CROSS,2ND PHASE, PEENYA,RAJAGOPAL NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560058 11. P. S. SHANMUGAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P. SHIVANNA, R/AT NO. 9, MANUVANA, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560010
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUIDLING, DR. ABMEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REPT BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. REPTD BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560020. 4. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE MUNEGOWDA
462
MAJOR IN AGE RESIDING AT SREERAMPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 5. SMT. ERAMMA, W/O BUDDANNA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 6. GOVINDAPPA, S/O. BUDDANNA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 7. LAXMAMMA W/O. NAGAPPA MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURA VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064 8. GUNDAPPA N, S/O. NANJAPPA REDDY MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT SREERAMAPURAM JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SMT. JAYAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SMT. ERAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. GOVINDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R6; SMT. LAXMAMMA, ADVOCATE FOR R7)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEX-P
DATED 18.06.2017 ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC.
463
IN W.P.NO.31268/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. K. SUDHA D/O. K. NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 107, SHANTHIBAGH APARTMENTS, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD-16.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 003. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 003.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND
MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO.5 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATHA NO. 621 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH
464
40 FEET COMPRISING OF HOUSE AND REVENUE SITE BEARING NO.6 ASSESSMENT NO. 46/2 KHATA NO.621 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 75 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH 40' FEET COMPRISING OF HOUSE BOTH THE SITES ARE FORMED IN SY. NO. 46/2 SITUATED AT AMRUTAHALLI VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALUR NORTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.33191/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. B. L. RAMAPPA S/O. LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.3/132, MANAVARTHI GARDEN, MASJID ROAD, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GOPAL V. BILAMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DATED 23.08.2016 AT ANNEXURE - F ISSUED BY
THE R-2 AND ETC.
465
IN W.P.NO.35344/2017: BETWEEN: 1. S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SINCE DEAD BY LR'S 1(a). C. GOWRAMMA W/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 55 YEARS 1(b). SRIDHAR. C S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 34 YEARS 1(c). BHAGYAJOTHI D/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 31 YEARS 1(d). GIRISH.C S/O. LATE S. CHANDRASHEKARACHAR AGED 27 YEARS ALL ARE R/O 43, RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE BANGALORE - 560 077 2. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE SHANKARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.R. SESHADRI, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 20.03.2018)
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN
466
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R3; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE R-2 BDA PERTAINING TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF LAND ACQUISITION IN CASE NO. R173/2003-04 IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.91 OF RACHENAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE (EAST) AT ANNEX - G AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.37044/2017: BETWEEN: SRI.D.V.ARUNACHALAIAH S/O LATE D VENKATASUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT 3RD FLOOR, MARALU RAJANNA BUILDING MARASANDRA MAIN ROAD, NEAR CORPORATION BANK HAROHALLI KANAKAPURA TALUK-562 112
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESH D. C., ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER
467
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-1 T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. M. V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT THE SITE MEASURING 30X40 FEET TO THE PETITIONER IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT ITSELF AS HE HAS MADE SEVEN ATTEMPTS AS PER THE UNOFFICIAL NOTE DATED 30.12.2011 ISSUE DBY CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BDA VIDE ANNEX - F AND THE SUBSEQUENT ENDORSEMENT DATED 17.04.2012, DATED 27.06.2012 AND 18.02.2013 VIDE ANNEX-J, H AND K RESPECTIVELY FORTHWITH. IN W.P.NO.40596/2017: BETWEEN: K. N. VENKATESHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE K.V.NARAYANAPPA, R/AT NO.851/A, 17TH G MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY.
468
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020 REPTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR,AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE, THAT THE ACQUISITION NOTIFICATIONS DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED UNDER SECTION 17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 AT ANNEX-B, BY THE R-2 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT AT ANNEX - C AND MODIFIED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNX -G ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED, ARE LAPSED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.42836/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. P. SHAKUNTALA W/O DR P CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.17, IST FLOOR, UAS, GK VK LAYOUT, 2ND CROSS, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
469
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE FINAL NOTIFICATION
DATED 23.02.2204 AS PER ANNEXURE - J ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN
RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE
LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF
RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND
ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013
[ CENTRAL ACT 30/2013] AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN
VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF THE
NEW ACT AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.43194/2017:
BETWEEN
SRIRAMA REDDY S/O LATE KEMPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.619, SRI CHOWDESHWARY NILAYA, 8TH CROSS, NEAR SAPPALAMMA TEMPLE, JAYANAGARA, KOLAR-563101
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V.S., ADVOCATE)
470
AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE SECRETARY BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJA H. T., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.05.2017 VIDE ANNEX - F AND F1 AND TO ALLOT THE SITE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER ADJACENT TO THE EARLIER ALLOTED SITE IN THE VERY SAME AREA AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.43207/2017: BETWEEN: SRI VENKATESH PRABHU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O KEMPAHANUMAIAH NO 396, 5TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BANGALORE - 560079
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. YASHAS B. L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
471
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BDA TO CONVEY THE SITE BEARING NO. 16 MEASURING 15 X 24 METERS IN BLOCK VI OF THE ARKAVATHY LAYOUT FORTHWITH AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.45953/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. A. DORISWAMY S/O LATE ARMUGAM AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.55, 3RD CROSS GANGAMMA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA BANGALORE-48
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 4. SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIUTHAPPA
472
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE, YELHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT DATED 12.05.2017 ISSUED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT REJECTING THE CLAIM OF THE PETITIONER
CONTENDING THAT VENDOR OF THE PETITIONER I.E. SRI
MUNIYAPPA S/O. MUNIUTHAPPA, 4TH RESPONDENT HAS BEEN
ALLOTTED THE ALTERNATIVE SITES UNDER 40:60 RATION
WHICH IS NOT PERMISSIBLE UNDER LAW IN RESPECT OF SITE
BEARING NO.6 IN SY.NO. 48/5 SITUATED AT AMRUTHAHALLI,
YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK VIDE ANNX - A
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.46333/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. UMA VARMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS W/O G.GODAVARMA RAJA, NO.32, PROMENADE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 005
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
473
2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT DATED 07.04.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 AS WELL AS THE PROCEEDINGS OF R-2 DATED 29.12.2016 IN SUBJECT NO. 141/2016 AT ANNEX -L1 TO W.P. (II) QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEXURE -G SO FAR IT PERTAINS TO SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -F IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVING REGARD TO THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER B.D.A. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA REPORTED IN ILP 2006 KAR 318 AND BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHER VS STATE OF KARNATAKA. IN W.P.NO.46766/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVARAJU C. A. S/O. LATE PATEL ANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO. 965, 4TH MAIN ROAD, BSK 3RD STAGE, KALIDASANAGAR, HOSKEREHALLI, BENGALURU-560 085.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NAIK N. R., ADVOCATE)
474
AND: THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BENGALURU-560 002.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT'S AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THE REGISTERED
SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. BK-17,
MEASURING 6.00 X 9.00 METERS, FORMED IN SY.NO. 22,
BYRATHIKHANE VILLAGE, 18TH BLOCK, ARKAVATHI EXTENSION
BENGALURU AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47823/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. APPANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA RESIDING AT K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560004 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
475
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47854/2017:
BETWEEN:
RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIANJINAPPA RESIDING AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 562 317
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560004 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560004
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
476
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEXURE - E AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.49031/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. MANJEGOWDA S/O LATE JAVARAPPA, AGED 68 YEARS R/AT NO.417, 13TH MAIN ROAD, M.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. S. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE SECRETARY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY -III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-IV, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPAL V. BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)
477
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT TO COMPLETE THE REMAINING PROCESS I.E., TO ISSUE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE AND ALSO TO EXECUTE THE REGISITERED LEASE CUM SALE AGREEMENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO. 1043, BLOCK VIII, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BANGALORE BASSED ON THE ALLOTMENT LETTER DATED 10.04.2014 VIDE ANNEX - J TO W.P. AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.50540/2017: BETWEEN; 1. SETHUMADHAVAN S/O A.P.V NAIR, AGE: 75 YEARS, R/AT NO 59, ARADHANA, AECS LAYOUT SANJAYANAGAR , BENGALURU - 560094 2. C. REKHA JETTY D/O K S CHANDRAN AGE:51 YEARS R/AT NO 22, 5TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, AGS LAYOUT, NEW BEL ROAD, BENGALURU - 560054 3. SANTHOSH KUMAR V. K S/O LATE A. C. B. NAIR AGE 54 YEARS R/AT NO 25, 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 4. C R JANARDHANAN S/O LATE T P RAMAN NAIR,
AGE:73 YEARS R/AT NO 12, 3RD CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT,
478
NEAR TELECOM LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU 5. PREM KUMAR S/O LATE P. SHIVASHANKARAN AGE: 46 YEARS R/AT NO 26, ADEEP 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 6. USHA HUSSAIN W/O ARSHAD HUSSAIN, AGE 48 YEARS, R/AT NO 7104, SOBHA CHRYSANTHEMU, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560077 7. P. R. SUBRAMANIAN S/O P. R. RAMAMURTHY AGE:58 YEARS R/AT NO 10, 3RD CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 8. S. PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O B. SHIVAJI RAO, AGE:43 YEARS R/AT NO 4, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077 9. AJAY KUMAR S/O LATE K. N. SINGH AGE: 58 YEARS R/AT NO 22, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT
ASHWATHNAGAR, THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077
479
10. VEENA THANGAMANI W/O NITHYNANDAN ANDIAPPA NAGERCOIL AGE:42 YEARS R/AT NO 182, RAMGOPAL LAYOUT SUBBANNA PALYAM BANASWADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE- 560043 11. VIJAYAKUMAR NAIK S/O LATE K K NAIR, AGE: 58 YEARS R/AT NO 24, 5TH CROSS, GOLDEN RETREAT LAYOUT, ASHWATHNAGAR THANISANDRA BENGALURU - 560077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRTARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MULTISTORIED BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGLAORE - 560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT REVENUE BHAVAN K. G. ROAD, BANGALORE- 560009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 & R3; SRI. M.V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
480
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANNX - H ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-G AND ALSO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-N ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SITE NOS. 2,3,5,25,12,26,14/A,10,4,22,17 AND 24 BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS FORMED IN SY.NO.12/4 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53428/2017: BETWEEN: SHADRACH S/O PETRAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO 25, LAXMIPATHY LAYOUT KARIYANNAPALYA BEHIND SPEECH AND HEARING INSTITUTE ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BENGALURU - 560084
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKASA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
481
KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.A. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 PASSED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER LAND IS CONCERNED BEARING SY.NO.30/4 TO AN EXTENT OF 0.22 GUNTAS OF LAND NOTIFIED FOR THE ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.54064/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. GEORGE K SAMUEL S/O LATE K A SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT KUTTIKATTU, NEDUMPARAMBU, PATHANAPURAM POST,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, SRI BIJU THOMAS PAREL, S/O P M THOMAS, NO.1, PAREL HOUSE, JYOTHINAGAR, IST CROSS, HORAMAVU AGARA, BENGALURU-560043
2. SRI MULLUMKATTI MATHE THOMAS S/O M.T. MATHEW, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT MULLUMKATTIL, EBENEZER, ANGADI P.O., RANNY, KERALA-689674 REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, P.P PAULSON S/O P.U.PAULSON, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.12, NEW MILLENEUM STREET, HORAMAVU, AGARA, BENGALURU-560043. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJAPPA A., ADVOCATE)
482
AND:
1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST) BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2. THE ADDL.LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P (WEST) BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO STRICTLY ADHERE AND FOLLOW CONDITIONS STIPULATED IN TERMS OF BANDU RAMASWAMY V/S BDA REPORTED IN 2010 (7) SCC PAGE 129 IN REPECT OF SY.NO.46/1 OF AMRUTHA HALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK
FORMED ON 0.24 GUNTAS OUT OF 2 ACTES 24 GUNTAS ACQUIRED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, AND DROP THE ACTION INITIATED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.54863/2017: BETWEEN: 1. MR. CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL S/O SRI.C.V. ACHUTHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.605 A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK
NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560047 2. MRS. REMADEVI VENUGOPAL W/O CHEMBRATH VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.605 A-2 MALLAPRABHA BLOCK NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560047. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)
483
AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-20 3. STATE OF KARANTAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM
TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30 X 40 IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN
ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONERS
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55316/2017: BETWEEN: MR. SHYAM MOHAN GARG AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O VISHWAMBHAR NATH GARG, NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA, UTTARPRADESH-281 001 TODAY AT BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)
484
AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM
TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN
ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.55317/2017: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. KOKIL GARG D/O. JAMUNA PRASAD AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS NO.18, BRIJ NAGAR, MATHURA, UTTARPRADESH-281001 TODAY AT BANGALORE.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE)
485
AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND TO DIRECT THEM TO ALLOT A SITE OF 30' X 40' IN THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR IN ANY LAYOUT FORMED BY THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CONVEY THE SAME TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56035/2017: BETWEEN: SRI. K. MUNISHAMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA NO.475, 11TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR
BENGALURU-560080 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAPI REDDY G., ADVOCATE)
486
AND: THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK EAST BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. M V ADITHI, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT ALTERNATIVE SITE MEASURING 15 METERS TO 24 METERS IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT OR SIMILARLY DEVELOPED LAYOUT TO THE PETITIONER WITHOUT INSISTING FOR PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OR EXTRA AMOUNT TOWARDS THE SITAL VALUE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3157/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. M. A. SYED NISAR AHMED AGED 59 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED AMEER SAB R/O NO.DA-57 KHB QUARTERS, KAVAL BYRASANDRA SULTHANPALYA R. T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 032
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BENGALURU-560020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-III BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOPAL BILALMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2)
487
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE REGULAR SALE DEED IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE SITE ALLOTTED TO HIM VIZ., SITE NO. 376/A, BLOCK - V, ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, BENGALURU, MEASURING 9 X 12 METERS IN PURSUANCE OF THE LEASE - CUM- SALE AGREEMENT DATED 30.06.2006 AS PER ANNEXURE - B EXECUTED BY R-2 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.3523/2018: BETWEEN: ANURADHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O LATE B R.T. RAJU NO.8/10, 1ST CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE 560020.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020. 2. LAND ACQUISITION AUTHORITY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTRHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. G. SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 TO ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE AT
ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS PER ORDER DATED 11/03/2014 ISSUED
BY R-2 A COPY OF WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - C AND
ETC.
488
IN W.P.NO.5448/2018: BETWEEN: M/S. TRINITY VILLAGE PLOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, R/O TRINITY ENCLAVE , HENNUR MAIN ROAD BANGALORE - 43 REPT BY ITS SECRETARY M. SRINIVAS
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASEKHARA K. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560001 REPT BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND R-3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION S OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 14.02.2014 AND 31.01.2018 GIVEN FOR DELETION OF HOUSE SITES FROM THE ACQUISITION IN RESPECT OF
SCHEDULE PROPERTIES SITUATED AT K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, VIDE ANNEX-A AND B RESPECTIVELY, AS PER THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2014 PASSED IN W.P. 32120-21/2013 AND 32371-32376/2013 AND 3481-3558/2014 (LA-BDA) VIDE ANNEX-D AND
489
ALSO AS PER THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE CASE OF BONDURAMASWAMY AND OTHERS VS. BDA AND OTHERS (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8731/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI H. M. KUMAR S/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.2244, 9TH MAIN ROAD, "E" BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010 2. SRI. M. HUCHE GOWDA S/O. LATE MARE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.322, 19TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, BEML LAYOUT, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560079
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HAVING OFFICE AT T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HAVING OFFICE AT T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020
3. THE BEML EMPLOYEE'S CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED REGD NO.ARB-2/F/PR-45/1983/71-72/
490
ARB-2/AUD/196/80-81, CARE OF BHARAT EARTH MOVERS LIMITED, B.E.M.L COMPLEX, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560075 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 4. SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA S/O LATE M. NARAYANA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 5. SMT. N. USHA GOPALA GOWDA W/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 6. KUM. SHARANYA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 7. KUM YOGITHA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 8. KUM VARSHITHA D/O SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, SINCE MINOR IN AGE, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRI M. JAYAGOPALA GOWDA, THE RESPONDENT NO.4 HEREIN RESPONDENTS 4 TO 8 ARE R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR.SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR POST, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560077 9. SRI. T. V. MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T. C. VENKATASWAMAPPA,
R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BENGALURU-560045
491
10. SRI CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O SRI DYAVAPPA, 11. SMT BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 12. SMT. C. KANTHAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, D/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 13. SMT C. ANASUYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 14. SRI C. KUMARA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 15. SRI C. KESHAVA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA, 16. SRI C. DEVARAJA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O SRI. CHANNAPPA, 17. SRI. C. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, 18. SRI. C. PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O SRI CHANNAPPA, RESPONDENTS 10 TO 18 ARE R/AT SARI PALYA, THANISANDRA DHAKLE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045
19. SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI THAMME GOWDA,
492
20. KUM M SHRAVANTHI D/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, 21. SRI M. HARSHIT GOWDA S/O SRI MUNISONNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 19 TO 21 ARE R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045 22. SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA, 23. SMT SHYLAJA W/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 24. SRI NAGENDRA S/O SRI T. P. NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 25. SRI VIJAYENDRA S/O SRI T P NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 22 TO 25 ARE RESIDING AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045 26. SRI T P GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE CHIKKA PAPANNA, 27. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
28. SRI NAGESHA S/O SRI T P GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
493
RESPONDENTS 26 TO 28 R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560045
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. LOHITSWA BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. B.E. SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. N.BYRE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R6 TO R17, R19, R23 TO R25, R27 AND R28; SMT. USHA GOPALA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
DATED 29.06.2007 PASSED BY THE R-2 WHEREIN THE CLAIMS
MADE BY THE SOCIETY AND THE ORIGINAL LAND OWNER IN
RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY NO. 17/8, 21/2, 20/4, 18/1,
18/4, 18/5, 17/10A, 16/10A, 16/11B, 23/1, 23/3, 95/3
SITUATED AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK AND GRANT BENEFIT OF THE 40:60
SCHEME TO THE PETITIONERS AS FOUND IN ANNEXURE -V TO
THE W.P. AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.9190/2018:
BETWEEN:
SALETH MARY 57992 W/O. PATRICK PETER, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS #4, 2ND BLOCK, DASAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR,
494
BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE-560 016.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M. G. JAVEED AHMED KHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARY, MULTI-STORIED BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH RAOD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.V. ADITHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO
IMPLEMENT THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT
ANNEXURE-C WHILE FORMING THE ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND
495
ALLOTING THE SAME TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT
INTERFERING WITH THE SITE OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12221/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI.N.SESHAGIRI RAO S/O LATE N.S.NAGARAJARAO, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. SRI RAGHAVENDRA MURTHY S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 3. SRI.ANANTHA MURTHY S/O LATE N.S. NAGARAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS ALL THE ABOVE ARE R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-560045
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. G.A. MITHUN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G. D. ASWATHANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
496
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, R.T.NAGAR DIVISION, BANGALORE -560 039 3. JAI HIND SPORTS ACADEMY REPRESENTED BY SRI VENKATASWAMY, S/O KUMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NAGAWARA VILLAGE, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 4. DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR YUVAKA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.T.RAMESH, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 5. BHUVANESWARI KANNADA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL, S/O JAYARAM DAS, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE-45 6. DR.RAJKUMAR ABHIMANIGALA SANGHA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI.RAVI KUMAR PATEL, S/O JAYARAM DAS, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, ARABIC COLLEGE POST,
BANGALORE-45
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR
497
SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; R3 SERVED; R4 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED 06.01.2018 IN O.S.NO. 8856/2012 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED XXXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BANGALORE ON I.A. NO.11 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND ENABLE
THE PLAINTIFFS TO CARRY OUT THE AMENDMENT AS SOUGHT
FOR AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.12792/2018: BETWEEN: 1. MRS. NIDHYA XAVIER AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS D/O A.M.M.S. XAVIER, R/O PLOT NO.24, 'ROYAL ENCLAVE ENTENSION', 'KALAKRUTHI AVENUE', INJAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041 REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.LINUS MARIADOSS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH VEDANAYAGAM, R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS, GRACE TOWN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560043 THE SECOND PETITIONER HEREIN 2. MR. LINUS MARIADOSS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MR. JOSEPH VEDANAYAGAM, R/O NO.44/30, 5TH CROSS, GRACE TOWN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD,
498
BENGALURU-560043 ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MULTISTORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-20 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHI KUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY R-2 DATED 03.02.2003 IN TERMS OF SECTION 17(1) AND (3) OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT VIDE ANNEX - W AND THE NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 IN TERMS OF SEC. 19(1) OF THE ACT IN SO FAR AS THEY RELATES TO SITE NUMBERS 15, 16 AND 17 CARVED OUT OF LAND IN SY. NO. 5 OF GEDDLAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK VIDE ANNEX - X; DATED 23.02.2004 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.25302/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B. CHANDRA SHEKAR HEBBAR S/O LAKSHMINARAYANA HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A BIADY VILLAGE
KOTESHWARA POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA-576222 2. SRI. L. G. SHESHADRI VASAN
499
S/O L. GOVINDA RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1351 "GOVINDA NILAYA", 5TH MAIN 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGARA BANGALORE-560010 3. SRI MOHAMMED ZAMEER S/O KHAJA MAIHUDDIN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO.118 "MUMTAZ MANIZIL", 4TH MAIN OPP ADESHWAR ELECTRONICS GANGANAGARA BANGALORE - 560 032 4. SMT LEELAVATI R HEGDE W/O R. G. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.20, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT DASARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 010 5. SRI. CHANDRU M S/O MUNIANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A NO.34, 12TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MARUTHI LAYOUT HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024 6. SRI. GOPAL. M S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A NO.2114, D BLOCK 9TH MAIN, SAHAKARNAGARA BANGALORE-560092 7. SMT T. R. PADMA MURTHY W/O T. R. KRISHNA MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO.4, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT BHUVANESHWARINAGARA
500
KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI BANGALORE-560024 8. SMT. K. KUSUMA GANAPATHY D/O M. K. MUNNAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS NO.11, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAYOUT BHUVANESHWARINAGARA, KEMPAPURA DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560024 9. SMT. MANGALA PRAKASH W/O SRI JAYAPRAKASH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.231, V MAIN 6TH PHASE, INDUSTRIAL TOWN RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE 10. SRI R. MANOHAR S/O M. R. RAJASHEKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS NO.26, 4TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN VASANTHAPPA BLOCK, GANGANAGARA BANGALORE-560032 11. SRI M. K. RAGHAVAN S/O LATE KUNJAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO.60, 12TH CROSS MARUTHI LAOUT HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA BANGALORE-560024.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. M. NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
501
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 4. SRI. B.P. RAJESH S/O LATE B. R. PANDU RANGA GUPTA R/A NO.8, GOVINDARAJU STREET SHESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME KNOWN AS " ARKAVATHI LAYOUT" IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 78, MEASURING 2 ACRES OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK, AS LAPSED AND TO GRANT CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF/S THERETO AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26667/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT PILLAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O LATE A. M. MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.412, NEAR AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE, JAKKUR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 2. SMT GOWRAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA,
502
W/O MUNIHUCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT BETTENAHALLI, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. TULSAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O LAKSHMAIAH GUNI AGRAHARA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT HESSARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI M. GOPAL S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, GANGAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, BALAPPA LAYOUT, AMRUTHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560092 5. BHAGYAMMA D/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIVEERAPPA, W/O PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HESANAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H. P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
503
KUMARA PARK, BELLARY ROAD, ( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020) 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK, BELLARY ROAD, ( T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020)
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.N. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SPECIAL GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND 2 UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL NO. 660 OF THE FINAL NOTIFICATION UNDER ANNEXURE - A AND QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE R-1 AND 2 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS LAND IS CONCERNED IN SL.NO.112 OF THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.27750/2018: BETWEEN: 1. MR. JAYARAM S. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBAIAH, 2. SMT M KANTHAMANI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O. MR.JAYARAM, 3. MR. J. VARUN
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O MR.JAYARAM, ALL ARE R/AT MARIAMMA TEMPLE, OLD POLICE STATION ROAD,
504
KADUGONDANAHALLI A.C.POST, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560045.
...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUNITHA H. SINGH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. M.V. THANUJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO/ PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.27947/2018:
BETWEEN: SMT SHARADA S. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
505
W/O LATE A.SADANANDA SHETTY, R/AT NO.206, SAHARA GRANDEUR APARTMENT, AMRUTHANAGAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560092.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT NO.2 TO FORTHWITH ALLOT AN ALTERNATE SITE
TO THE PETITIONER AS SOUGHT FOR IN ANNEXURE - B AND
ETC.
IN W.P.NO.30106/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT P. V. MANJULA SRINIVAS W/O DR. SAKEY SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.1,TYPE-IV QUARTERS, IVRI,HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560 024
506
2. DR. P. V. SHIVAKUMAR S/O P V RAGHU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.32,HMT LAYOUT, 80 FEET ROAD EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560 032
3. SMT G. RAJINI DEVI W/O P. V. MOHAN BABU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.E-11 STREET, BROADWAY ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 051
4. SMT P C NANDA W/O P R CHANDAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.4,"D" 2ND STREET, BROADWAY ROAD CROSS, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 051
5. SRI V NAGARAJ S/O LATE P VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.7,2ND FLOOR, G NO.11TH STREET, JOGUPALYAM, HALASURU, BENGALURU-560 008
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE ) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020
507
3. THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 VAKALATH FILED FOR R3 ONLY) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNX -Y DATED 03.02.2203 IN NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNEX - Y AND Y1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.38977/2018: BETWEEN 1. ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY S/O LATE BISHAN DAYAL TAWAKLEY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. VINITA TAWAKLEY W/O ASHWINI DAYAL TAWAKLEY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.73, ETON AVENUE WEMBLEY MIDDLESEC HAO 3AZ UNITED KINGDOM. ALSO AT GATEWAY HOTEL NO.66 RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.R. GURUMATH, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE)
508
AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ARKAVATHY LAYOUT RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO REGULARIZE THE SITE NO. 218, HOUSE LIST KHATHA NO. 28/218. MEASURING 70 X 65 FEET SITUATED AT RACHENAHALLY VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.39615/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. S. KRISHNAMURTHY SON OF LATE SHESHACHAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4/14, QUARTERS IVRI, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 2. SRI. K. T. RAMESHKUMAR SON OF LATE SRI. A. K. THIRUVENGADAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 412, GROUND FLOOR, 6TH MAIN, 4TH "D" CROSS, HRBR LAYOUT,
509
2ND BLOCK, KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 3. K. T. GEETHA SAMPATHKUMARI D/O. LATE A. K. THIRUVENGADAM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 213, "MALATHI NILAYAM", 7TH "B" MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 4. SRI. C. SHIVAMADAV SON OF C. SHANKARRAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYAPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS), CUDDAPH DISTRICT, A.P. PIN: 516 101. 5. SRI. K. RADHAKRISHNAN SON OF LATE SRI. C. BHASKARAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 3/1, IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 6. SRI. N. JAIRAJ SON OF LATE V. NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 241, 7TH MAIN, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 045. 7. SMT. SUJATHA WIFE OF M. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI, VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS), CUDDAPH DISTRICT,
510
A.P., PIN-516 101. 8. SRI. GOLLA RAMALINGA REDDY SON OF GOLLA PITCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 9. SMT. V. RAMA WIFE OF DR. V. V. SURYANARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 10. MR. MATHEW P. THOMAS SON OF LATE REV. FR. P.C. THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.31, "THANALI", 2ND CROSS, 3RD BLOCK, DASAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 016. 11. SMT. DEEPA MATHUR WIFE OF A. M. MATHUR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT IVRI CAMPUS, HEBBAL, BANGALORE-560 024. 12. DR. SATHYANARAYANA SAHA SON OF LATE MR. SHARATCHANDRA SAHA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT N.5, "SHARATH", 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, PAMPA EXTENSION, HEBBAL KEMPAPURA, BANGALORE-560 024.
13. SMT. S. MALATHI WIFE OF SRI. T. SANNATH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 213,
511
"MALATHI NILAYAM", 7TH "B" MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, 2ND BLOCK, KALYANANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043. 14. SMT. SAMBARU KRISHNAVENI WIFE OF DR. K. GANESH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 27, GANESH NILAYA, 11TH CROSS, GANGANAGARA NORTH, BANGALORE-560 024.
15. SMT. LEELAVATHI WIFE OF SRI. S. R. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 27, 24TH "A" CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, 1ST MAIN, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064.
16. SMT. C. SUSHEELA WIFE OF SHANKAR RAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATAREDDYPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR (RS) CUDDAPH DISTRICT, A.P. PIN: 516 101. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. R. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
512
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE -T AND ANOTHER NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE - S AND T AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.48266/2018: BETWEEN: SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O NARAYANAPPA, R/AT SAMPIGE HALLI, JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560064
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,M S BUILDING, BENGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE- 560 001 BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 001
513
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY,SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS PER ANNEXURE - H TO THE W.P. IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53051/2018: BETWEEN: SRI R. M. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE G.RAMAIAH, R/AT NO.925/A, 3RD B CROSS, H.R.B.R. I BLOCK, KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 043.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. C. M. NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
514
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE -D DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN THE ALTERNATIVE IF THIS HON'BLE COURT HOLDS THAT, RESPONDENTS HAVE A POWER TO ISSUE ANNEXURE-D AND THEN TO DECLARE THAT, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION, DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEXURES - E & F CEASES TO EXIST AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.53250/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SRI JOSEPH M MARIRAJ S/O MARIRAJ AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. SMT SUJATHA MARIRAJ W/O JOSEPH MARIRAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS BOTH ARE R/O D NO.49 ROBERSON ROAD FRAIZER TOWN BENGALURU-560 005
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU-560 020 REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
515
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DILDAR SHIRALLI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY NO. 83/1 HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 03.02.2003 IN PAGES 155-164, AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND H ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC.24[2] OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITIATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.56686/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SHAHEEN FATHIMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS W/O MR MOHAMMED YOUSUFF RESIDING AT NO.5/1 STEPHENS ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI. B. M. MADAPPA 2. MRS NAGEENA BEGUM AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS W/O MR AMMANULLAH KHAN R/AT NO.8 AHMED SET ROAD
FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA
516
3. MR. FIYAZ AHMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL VAHAB R/AT NO.40/2 STANDAGE ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA 4. MR. SANAULLAH KHAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O RASHEEDULLAH KHAN R/AT 8 AHMED SET ROAD FRAZER TOWN BANGALORE-560 005 REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI B. M. MADAPPA
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560 020 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
517
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS
ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE - M IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS
AND THEIR SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2939/2019: BETWEEN: JOSEPH THOMAS AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS POTHAN, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT "THOPPIL KANDATHIL", 10TH KILOMETER STONE, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, KALYANNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 043.
...PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUVARNA M.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020. 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
518
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.09.2018 (UNDER ANNEXURE -J TO THE WRIT PETITION) ISSUED BY THE R-3 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DE-NOTIFY/DROP FROM ACQUISITION LAND BEARING SY.NO.10 OF GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK MEASURING 4.04 GUNTAS OWNED BY THE PETITIONER AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8325/2019: BETWEEN: NOREEN AHMED D/O.AMEER AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION, BENGALURU.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
519
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 03.02.2003 IN PAGES 155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE -J AND L ISSUED BY R2 AND R1 RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8329/2019: BETWEEN: NAVEEN ALEEM W/O ABDUL ALEEM AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O 12, 6TH CROSS, JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION BENGALURU. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUAMRA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
520
KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SMT. M.R. VANAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.83/1, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE PM 3/2/2003 IN PAGES 155-164 AND 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 IN PAGES 51-55 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND J ISSUED BY R2 AND R1 RESPECTIVELY ARE DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN LAPSED BY VIRTUE OF SEC. 24[2] OF THE RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.12093/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DHAKSHAYINI
W/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 359 6TH MAIN ROAD
7TH BLOCK 2ND STAGE NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072.
2. MR. B.S. JAGADISH S/O LATE S.G. SIKHARANNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 359 6TH MAIN ROAD, 7TH BLOCK 2ND STAGE, NAGARBHAVI BENGALURU - 560 072. … PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE)
521
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
4. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
5. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
6. MR. K.K. ANANTHNARAYAN
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O K.N. KESHAVA RESIDING AT NO 914 LAKSHMI NILAYA, 1ST STAGE 2ND CROSS, BEHIND SOLOMON APARTMENTS CHANDRA LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 072.
7. MR. L. HARISH
S/O R. LAKSHMIKANTH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT SHREE KABIR
522
ASHRAM, 8TH CROSS H SIDDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE PETITIONERS INSTITUTED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DTD 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DTD 03.02.2003 FOR THE ACQUISITION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FOR FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT VIDE ANNX-E AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNX-G TO HAVE BEEN ABANDONED AND LAPSED AND HENCE HAVE BECOME INOPERATIVE IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED. IN W.P.NO.15096/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. SATEESH PILLAI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O SRI.PARAMESHWARAN PILLAI PRESENTLY R/AT NO.82, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BAGALUR ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE-560 084. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
523
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHAHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. RAMANJANEYA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS ANNEXURE - D AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15199/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. E. LOKESH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SRI ESHWAR MURTHY PRESENTLY R/AT NO.22, IST CROSS, SANJEEVA REDDY STREET, ANJENARAYANAPPA LAYOUT SUBBANAPALYA BANGALORE-560033
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING DR AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
524
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPEMNT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15531/2019: BETWEEN: SRI. NAVANITHA KRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. SRI. RAMADURAI, PRESENTLY NO.34, 1ST FLOOR, 'KRISHNA BUILDING', DAYANANDA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 016. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
525
KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR
AS THE PETITIOENRS SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED
MARKED AS " ANNEXURE -D " AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.15532/2019: BETWEEN: MR. A. H. SHOAIB MOHAMMED AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O SRI. S.A. ABVDUL HAMEED PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS, KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560032. (BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. YASMEEN ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 59 YEARS W/O S.A. ABDUL HAMEED, R/OF NO.57, 4TH CROSS, R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE)
526
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTEMTN OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1, IN SOF AR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS " ANNEXURE - C " AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15534/2019: BETWEEN: SMT. ALLI RAJENDRAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O SRI. K. RAJENDRAN PRESENTLY R/AT NO.57, 4TH CROSS KANAKANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA K., ADVOCATE)
527
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMNT M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A.D. VIJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER'S SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED MARKED AS ANNEXURE -D AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.26852/2019: BETWEEN: 1. SMT MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS 2. SMT RATHNAMMA D/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
3. SRI APPAIAH S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
528
4. SMT NEELAMMA W/O LATE MUNIRAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 5. SMT SAROJAMMA W/O LATE MUNISWAMY S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 6. SMT SHOBHA W/O LATE MUNIKRISHNA S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 7. SRI K. GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE M. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 8. SMT. NARAYANAMMA D/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 9. SRI. GANGADHAR S/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF #210/211 MUNIRAJU COMPOUND AMRUTHAHALLI MAIN ROAD SAHAKARANAGARA POST BENGALURU-560 092
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJAGOPAL M. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHRORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
529
KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 3. THE SEPCIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION INITIATED BY ISSUING THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 ISSUED BY R-2 AS PER ANNEXURE -F, FOLLOWED BY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 AS PER ANNEXURE - G AND THE RE-DO FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY R-1 AS PER ANNEXURE-H IS LAPSED AND THE PROVISIONS UNDER THE BENGALURU PARTICULARLY SECTION 36(30) IS INAPPLICABLE BY APPLYING SECTION 27 OF THE SAID ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.50257/2019: BETWEEN: 1. NARAYANASWAMY S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. MUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. CHANDRA S/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 016
530
REPT. BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDER, SYED AKMAL PASHA, S/O. SYED ABDUL RAWOOF, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.157/2, NEHRUPURAM, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 001.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A. KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH ARE PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE -G AND H RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.10568/2015: BETWEEN: MR. A. ALBERT ANTHONY S/O LATE J ANTHONY
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT # SITE NUMBER - 2 HOUSE LIST KHATHA NO. 228/2 K NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI
531
BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE-560
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K. P. WEST BANGALORE-560 020 2. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD K P WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R T NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, B D A COMPLEX R. T. NAGAR BANGALORE-560032 5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BANGALORE-560001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D.N.NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION HAVING NUMBER DATED 03.02.2003 A TRUE
532
COPY IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION HAVING DATED 23.02.2004 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - B AND ALSO 2ND FRESH FINAL NOTIFICATION HAVING DATED 18.06.2014 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -C AS THEY ARE LAPSED AND ALSO THAT THEY ARE BAD IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.15003/2013: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE W/O. S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O "KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020. 2. SRI. HARSHA HEGDE S/O. S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O "KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020. 3. SMT. RASHMI HEGDE D/O S.M. HEGDE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O " KANTHI" NO. 13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR P A HOLDER SMT. KANTHI HEGDE …PETITIONERS (SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
533
M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE -560 020 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER ALLOTTING A CA SITE IN FAVOUR OF HENNUR POLICE STATION DATED 11.02.2010 UNDER ANN - X NUMBERING NIL IN SO FAR AS IT RELATE TO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER, BDA AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.14874/2014: BETWEEN: SMT BHARATHI SHIVAKUMAR W/O SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16 5TH CROSS, HOYSALA LAYOUT SRIRAMAPURA MAIN ROAD AMURTHAHALLI SAHAKARANAGARA POST BANGALORE - 560092
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. S. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
534
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DR. T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION OF THE LAND INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN
PURSUANCE OF THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004
VIDE ANN - L, STOOD LAPSED IN SO FAR AS THE PETITION
SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.27833/2014: BETWEEN:
M/S SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANYS ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
535
AT DEVARABISANAHALLI SARJAPUR-MARATHAHALI OUTER RING ROAD BELLANDUR POST BANGALORE-560103 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SMT. PADMAVATHI V
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURAJ GOVINDA RAJ, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVANA K. G. ROAD BANGALORE-560009 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M. S. BUIDLING BANGALORE - 560 001 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 4. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI BANGALORE-560020 5. ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. T.P. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE R-3 AND R-4 TO DE-NOTIFY THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY FROM
536
THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANN-AJ IN SO FAR AS RESIDENTIALLY CONVERTED IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IN SY.NO.30 MEASURING 1 ACRE 12 GUNTAS OF SAMPIGEHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.42498/2014: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. AVINASH S/O A ANAND AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.10A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 2. SRI ANJANKUMAR S/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.3, 13TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 3. SMT CHAYADEVI D/O SRI HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.11A, 13TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 4. SRI ASHWIN J. S. S/O SRIKANTA S AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.1 & 4 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
5. SMT SUMITHRA SATHISH W/O SATHISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.1A, 13TH A CROSS
537
JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 6. SRI MUNIHANUMAIAH S/O MUNIHANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.16A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 7. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O SADAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.10A, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 8. SRI BYRAPPA S/O MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.10, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 9. SRI SOMASHEKAR S/O SONAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.9, 12TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 10. SRI MANJUNATH G S/O A GOPAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT NO.3 AND 4 12TH A CROSS
JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
538
11. SRI A NARAYANASWAMY S/O AVALAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.8, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 12. SMT SHOBHA W/O UDAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.14, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 13. SMT AMINABI W/O BASHA B AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.18, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 14. RAVISHANKAR BHAVE S/O M V BHAVE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.13, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
15. SMT RAJAESHWARI W/O. M. C. BACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.7, 11TH A CROSS JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SUMITHRA G.M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
539
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BANGALORE
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20
3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 20 4. SRI ANJENE GOWDA S/O LATE PILLAPPA AND SMT. LATE MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 5. SRI. BYRAPPA S/O. SRI NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 6. P. RAMACHANDRAPPA S/O LATE PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 RESIDING AT JAKKUR VILLAGE YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE R2 & R3; SRI. AMAREESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. N JAI PRAKASH RAO, ADVOCATE AND SRI. B. SRINIVASGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SKETCH ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO R-6 DATED 03.10.2011 VIDE ANNEX - A BY EXCLUDING THE LAND OF THE
540
R-4 TO R-6 FROM THE ACQUISITION AND INCLUDED THE LAND TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 26 GUNTAS IN WHICH PETITIONERS CONSTRUCTED THEIR RESIDENTIAL HOUSES IN THE ACQUISITION AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.45230/2014: BETWEEN S. HEMAVATHI W/O LAKKAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 168, 2ND CROSS, 3RD PHASE, 1ST MAIN, MANJUNATHANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE -1 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE -20 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION BANGALORE -20 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX, R.T. NAGAR
BANGALORE -20 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX
541
R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE -20. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH DECLARE THAT
THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY SITUATED IN SY.NO.40 (PRESENT
SY.NO.40/P1P1) AND NOT BEING PART OF THE LANDS NOTIFIED
FOR ACQUSITION EITHER UNDER THE PRELIMINARY OF FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 & 22.03.2004 VIDE ANNX - K &
L UNDER SECTION 17(1) & (3) OF THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT 1976 DATED 03.02.2003 AND
U/S 19 OF THE B.D.A ACT 1976 DATED 22.03.2004, THE
RESPONDENTS HAVE NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ACT IN
RESPECT OF THE SAME IN ANY MANNER THE PROPERTY
PRESENTLY COMING WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE BBMP
AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47606/2014: BETWEEN: SRI P. VENUGOPAL S/O P.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT 'MAHATE', NO.72/1, 3RD MAIN, 16TH CROSS, G.D. PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560 003.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATIL JAI M., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST,
542
BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT (RFD), IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ANNX - K TO THE W.P.) IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AS AGAINST SY.NOS 45/5 & 45/6 IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND (PROPERTY) AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.47607/2014: BETWEEN: SMT. P. CHANDRAKALA W/O P. VENUGOPAL,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A. 'MAHATE' NO.72/1, 3RD MAIN, 16TH CROSS,
543
G.D PARK EXTENSION, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE - 560 003
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 3. THE TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R4; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
LANDS WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT (RFD) IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHEME FOR ARKAVATHI LAYOUT
(VIDE ANNX -K TO THE W.P.) AS AGAINST SY.NOS. 45/5 & 45/6 IS
WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT ANY ACQUISITION
544
PROCEEDINGS AND UNENFORCEABLE AGAINST THE
PETITIONER SO FAR AS PETITIONER SCHEDULE LAND
(PROPERTY) AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.58829/2014: BETWEEN: 1. CAPT. LAKSHMANAN VELLIKATH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE V KUNHIRAMAN, RESIDING AT HOUSENO.48 AND 49, SY NO.97/2,I CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 2. COL N. R. BALARAMAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANA RAO, RESIDING AT NO.6, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 3. SRI. V. M. SATHISH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O SRI V V MADAVAN, RESDIIDNG AT NO.57, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 4. SRI J. N. NAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, S/O LATE J. NARAYANAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.70, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 5. SRI GANESH HEGDE AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA HEGDE,
545
6. SMT.SANDHYA GANESH HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRIGANESH HEGDE, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.55, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 7. SMT. CHANNAMMA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, W/O KAKAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.172,1ST FLOOR, L K RAJU BUILDING, 1ST MAIN,MILK COLONY, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, BANGLORE-560 010. 8. SRI VISHWANATH N V AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.63, SY NO.97/2,1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 9. SMT SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, W/O LATE K LAKSHMINARAYANA, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.63, SY NO.97/1, 3RD CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 10. SMT. SANDHYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRI GANESH HEGDE, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.55, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 11. SMT. P BANUMATHI
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMESH BABU, RESIDING AT NO.3641, 13 'B' MAIN ROAD,
546
H.A.L., BANGALORE-560 038. 12. SMT MEENA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O LATE MUNIRAJ, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.45, SY NO.97/2, 1ST CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 13. SRI GOPAL C., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O CHANNAPPA, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.18 AND 19, SY NO.97/1, 4TH CROSS, NAVYANAGAR,JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064. 14. SRI. A. G. RAMAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 15. SMT.K LAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.118, 8TH A CROSS, PRASHANTHNAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079.
...PETITIONERS (BY SMT. K. SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K. P. WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
547
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K. P. WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE AND SRI. M.B. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BDA ACT VIDE ANN-K IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE LANDS IN SY.NO. 97/2 AND 97/1 MEASURING 2 ACRES 36 GUNTAS AND 4 ACRES 37 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT JAKKUR VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2935/2015: BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED AJAZ SHERRIFF SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9, AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESETNED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001
2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
548
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUSITION), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 T0 R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE
THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003
VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA
GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED
18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR
DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K
AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE
LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT
2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.2936/2015: BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED FIAZ SHARIFF SON OF ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9,
549
AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003 VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE
ANN - D, FINAL NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 VIDE ANN - E, AWARDS DATED 18.10.2004 VIDE ANN-F & G, AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN - K AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE
550
LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24[2] OF RIGHT OF FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2937/2015: BETWEEN: SRI NAQHI R S/O BABU SAB AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 9, AGA ABDULLA STREET, RICHMOND STREET, BANGALORE-560 025
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAND ACQUISITION) BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
4. THE LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
551
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND DECLARE
THAT THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 03.02.2003
ISSUED BY R-2 VIDE ANN - C, THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED
23.02.2004 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANN-D, FINAL NOTIFICATION
PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014
ISSUED BY R1 VIDE ANN-E, AWARDS DATED 18.10.2004 VIDE
ANN -F & G, ISSUED BY R-4 AND THE POSSESSION MAHAZAR
DATED 10.11.2004 DRAWN BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE ANN -K
AND L, IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY HAVE
LAPSED BY GIVING EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
24[2] OF RIGHT TO AIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN
LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT
2013 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.6225/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HARISH PRABHU B. G. S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 2. SRI SATISH PRABHU B G S/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT: NO.3525/2/69/3, MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI, VIRUPAKSHAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 036
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K., ADVOCATE AND
552
SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SECRETARY THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R3 STATE GOVT. IMPLEADED AS PARTY AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20/01/2016) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE OFFICIALS OF THE RESPONDENTS OF BDA NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS THE SAME IS NOT ACQUIRED FOR THE FORMATION OF ARKAVATHI LAYOUT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.7038/2015: BETWEEN: SRI D. RAMANAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF LATE D. KOTESWARA RAO, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.45/D1 OLD MARKET ROAD, CANTONMENT,
BELLARY-583 104 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE)
553
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSINOER KUMAR PARK WEST BANGALORE. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMAR PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 4. SRI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, 5. SRI. KANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. MUNISHAMAPPA, 6. SRI. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA 7. SRI LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF SRIRAMPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 018
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)
554
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO
7 DATED 08.01.2005 VIDE ANN - R AND QUASH THE
ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-3 IN FAVOUR OF THE R-4 TO
7 DATED 31.05.2012 VIDE ANN - U AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.7322/2015: BETWEEN: 1. DR. RENUKA DEVI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS W/O DR. H. S. PRABHAKARA 2. DR H. S. PRABHAKARA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT NO.389, 1ST FLOOR, F BLOCK SAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE - 560 092
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS
COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
555
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE BANGALORE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE AN ENDORSEMENT IN
FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS ON THE SAME TERMS AS
ENDORSEMENT DATED 09.03.2012 (ANNX -J) ISSUED IN
RESPECT OF ADJACENT SITE NOS. 65 & SITE NO.20 SITUATED
IN SY.NO. 79, DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK
CONFIRMING THAT THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS NOT PART OF
THE ACQUIRED PORTION OF THE LAND AND GRANT ALL
CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEFS THERETO AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8111/2015: BETWEEN: SMT. DEVI VISWANATHAN W/O T. VISWANATHAN AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/A NO.1590, 8TH STREET KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE NEAR DAYANANDA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-560078
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SHANKARA NARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
556
M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX - G) IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4 OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TO., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8112/2015: BETWEEN: SRI T. VISWANATHAN S/O P N THIRUGANANASAMBANDAM AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1590, 8TH STREET KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, IST STAGE NEAR DAYANANDA ENGINEERING COLLEGE BANGALORE-560 078
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE)
557
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 (ANNX-G) IN SO FAR AS IT
RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMED IN SY.NO.83/4
OF THANISANDRA VILLAGE. K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TQ., BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AT SL.NO. 575 OF
THE SCHEDULE APPENDED TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED
18.06.2014 AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.19086/2015: BETWEEN:
SRI. H. V. RAJESH S/O SRI. H. S. VARADARAJA IYENGAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT
558
NO.100, 8TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM , BANGALORE - 03
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. H. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 20.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX - F AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.21999/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT M. SHASHIKALA W/O SHRI RAMESH RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.218,
'SHASHIRA', TEACHERS COLONY, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072.
559
2. SMT.KALAVATHI BAI W/O SHRI. ROOP SINGH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.125, M.S.S.R NAGAR, MATHIKERE, BANGALORE-560 054. 3. SMT. JOHNSY BEULA W/O SHRI. ARTHUR SOLOMON, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.8, ANUJAY, CAUVERY STREET, ANJANEYASWAMY LAYOUT, THINDLU, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 097.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NITIN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSISONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, K.P.WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SECOND
560
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AS PUBLISHED IN THE KARNATAKA GAZETTE ON 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNX -H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.28675/2015: BETWEEN: SMT. K. NAVANEETHA W/O LATE K. SEETHARAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.49, DVG ROAD GREEN GARDEN, III MAIN II PHASE, BANJARA LAYOUT HORAMAVU, KALKERE POST BENGALURU - 560 043
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPOMENT DEPARTMENT 5TH FLOOR, M. S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND R-1
561
& 2 TO APPLY THE RATIO PARAMETERS LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND THE APEX COURT IN BONDU RAMASWAMY'S CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129, BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER AS ANNEXURE - P & Q RESPECTIVELY, SUBMITTED THROUGH HER SOCIETY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.34826/2015: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANTHI HEGDE W/O S.M. HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 2. SRI.HARSHA HEGDE S/O S.M. HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SMT.RASHMI HEGDE D/O S.M.HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O KANTHI, NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN, PALACE CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020. PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR P A HOLDER SMT.KANTHI HEGDE R/O. KANTHI NO.13, CHAKRAVARTHY LAYOUT 1ST MAIN PALACE CROSS ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 020 ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. YESHU MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.M. HEGDE KADAVE, ADVOCATE)
562
AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SITE NOS. 3, 5, 7, 9 & 12 FORMED IN THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 82/8 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ., VIDE ANNX -D AS STATED IN THE SCHEDULE ISSUED BY R-1 AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59793/2015: BETWEEN: M/S. SOBHA PROJECTS AND TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956,
HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.23/1, SONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, BROOKE FIELD, MAHADEVAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 048 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
563
BY SMT. V. PADMAVATHI ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR DESHAPANDE, ADVOCATE AND SRI. S.V.BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 03 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 03 4. SRI.MADHUSOODAN NAMBIAR S/O SRI.KUPPADAKATH RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, AGED 56 YEARS, NO.1, CHRISTELLA VILLA, 206, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE-560 066
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3; SRI. VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 UNDER SECTION 17[1] OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT,1976 [KARNATAKA ACT.NO.12
OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX -J IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.137/1 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE, OF WHICH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMS PORT AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 19[1] OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976
564
[KARNATAKA ACT NO.12 OF 1976] VIDE ANNEX - L IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.137/1 OF CHALLAKERE VILLAGE OF WHICH THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMS PORT IN THE ALTERNATIVELY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.1876/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. SARADA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/A NO.44/2, 7TH CROSS 7TH MAIN, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE-560003
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - D IN SO FAR AS
565
THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.8603/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. DILIP PRABHAN S/O SRI R. PRABHAKAR MAJOR, RESIDING AT LAXMI NIVAS MAMANGALM, PALARIVATTON COCHIN-680025 KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN S/O LATE SRI RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT CHRISTELLA VILLA NO.1 206, WHITEFIELD, MAIN ROAD BANGALORE-66
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MANJUNATHA V RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-1 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
566
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION BENGALURU DATED
03.02.2003 AT ANNEX - G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION
VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.8707/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. M. M. NAMBOODIRIPAD S/O SRI. NAMBOODIRI PAD, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NOW RESIDING AT, APARTMENT C-403, MANASA ROYAL, OPPOSITE NARAYANANANDA YOGA ASHRAM,HINKAL, MYSORE-570 030. REPRESENTED BY HIS, POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, NAMBIAR RAGHAVAN MADHUSOODAN, MAJOR, S/O LATE SRI. RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT VILLA NO.1, CRISTALA,206, WHITE FIELD, MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-66.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR SAMANTH, ADVOCATE AND SRI. MANJUNATHA V. RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-01. 2. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGLAORE-560001.
567
3. THE ADDL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 AT ANNEX
-G AND QUASH THE FINAL DECLARATION VIDE NOTIFICATION
DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX - J AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.16505/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. BASAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS AMANIBYRATHIKANE K.R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST - 560 036 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN STATE OF KARNATAKA VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST
568
BANGALORE - 560 020 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANASWADI DIVISION BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 043 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1-R4; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEXURE -E INSOFAR AS
PETITIONER LAND AND DECLARE THAT THE LAND BEARING
SY.NO.5/2 AN EXTENT OF 0.34 GUNTAS NOTIFIED FOR
ACQUISITION IN THE YEAR 2004 FAIL TO TAKE POSSESSION AND
PASS AWARD AS PROVIDED UNDER THE STATUES
CONSEQUENTLY THE SCHEME IS LAPSED AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.20131/2016: BETWEEN: SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI S/O SRI. RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS, 2ND CROSS LANE, LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400 053.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
569
M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - E ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.20132/2016: BETWEEN: SRI JANAK RANJIT TOPRANI S/O SRI RANJIT HARIDAS TOPRANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT 311-312 SHEFFIELD TOWERS, 2ND CROSS LANE, LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400 053.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNTAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
570
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 WHICH IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE -E ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND RELATING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO. 34947/2016: BETWEEN: 1. MR. MANSOOR PASHA N. S/O LATE NAWAB JAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT SITE BEARING NO.34, JANJAR NO.1433/1, KHATA NO.34, VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT, THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE. 2. MR.MOHAMMED FAROOQ S/O LATE GULAM HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. MRS. SHAKEELA BANU
W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.35, JANJAR NO.1433D/1, KHATA NO.35, VIDYA SAGAR LAYOUT,
571
THANISANDRA, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE. 4. SMT.ALMAS W/O AMJAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.19/3, 3RD FLOOR, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, BANGALORE-560 053. 5. SMT.MUBEEN TAJ W/O CHAND PASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.44, KATHA NO.2812, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE. 6. MR.IMTIYAZ PASHA S/O MOHAMMED YACOOB, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.19/3, 1ST FLOOR, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, BANGALORE-560 053.
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMEMT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 020.
572
4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGAORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS AT ANNEX - J AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.35309/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SMT ASMA BEGUM W/O. SYED EHTSHAMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 66, K.H.M. BLOCK, GANGANAGAR, 4TH MAIN, BANGALORE - 560032 2. SMT. S. ANSARI BEGUM W/O. ABDUL MAJEED, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 75, PILLANNA GARDEN, 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE - 560084 3. SMT. ZEENATHI JAN WIFE OF LATE. MOHAMMED SAMIULLA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO. 9, 4TH-B-CROSS,
16TH STREET, CHANDINI CHOWK ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560001
573
4. SRI. S. SELVARAJ S/O. B. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 218, RAMACHANDRAPPA LAYOUT, KARIYANNAPALYA, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560084 5. SRI. A NELSON MARIANATHAN S/O. A AUGUSTINE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 314/5, C-BLOCK, AMBEDKARNAGAR, ARABIC COLLEGE POST, BANGALORE - 560 045 6. SMT. AISHA JHAN WIFE OF MOHAMMED AKRAM AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 185, 4TH MAIN, SRIRAMPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 021
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY S. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 021 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. G.S. KANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
574
SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BYTHE R-1 AT ANNX -H BANGALORE DATED 18.06.2014 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THE SAME IS UNENFORCEABLE IN THE EYE OF LAW AND PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONERS BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION AT ANNX - H AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.39427/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. FAROOK KHAN S/O. AYAZ GHANI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.43, INFANTRY ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SMT. JABEEN TAJ D/O. NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 632, CHUNCHAPPA BLOCK, R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 062.
...PETITIONERS (BY S. V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER BDA, KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU-560 020.
575
3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BDA, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR AND SRI. NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 (ANNEXURE - E) AND ALSO
FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 ( ANNEXURE -G) ISSUED
BY R-1 & 2 IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
CONCERNED AS ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL ULTRA - VIRES
AND OPPOSED TO ALL CANNONS OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL
JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.47965/2016: BETWEEN: M/S. CONNEXIONS L.P.G. AND ACCESSORIES A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 032. AND HAVING ITS GODOWN AT: SITE BEARING NOS. 1, 1/A & 1/B, HOUSE LIST NO.99, KHATHA NO. 384/A, HENNUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 084,
REPRESENTED BY DULY AUTHORIZED PARTNER: MR. T. RAMU, S/O. LATE SRI. MADHAVA NAIDU T., AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
576
NO.116, P & T COLONY, R.T. NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 032.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANESH BHAT Y. H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. 3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -T AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.51142/2016: BETWEEN: MRS. SHERIN MICHAEL AGED 55 YEARS, WIFE OF MR. PRAKASH EARNEST MICHAEL RESIDING AT NO.26, 1ST MAIN, 2ND & 3RD CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI,
577
K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31/1, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.55666/2016:
BETWEEN: SRI. S. G. JAYADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.GANGA SETTY,
578
NO.82, 1ST MAIN, 6TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL AND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE,
IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
579
IN W.P.NO.57150/2016: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KARTHIGEYAN JAYARAJ S/O SRI R JAYARAJ, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO.49, IST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K.NARAYAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETATY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK ROAD, BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -M IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
580
IN W.P.NO.57245/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. MAHESH C., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, SON OF SRI. V. S. CHANDRASEGARAM NO.45, 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B V SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,
581
WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58220/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. M. J. VEERESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF SRI. S.M. JAYANNA NO.23, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 077.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
582
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.58223/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SIMON LAWRENCE AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SON OF SRI. PETER JOSEPH NO.138, 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALROE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
583
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31,
GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL,
WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND
HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.58362/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. SAGAYI RAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SON OF SRI. JOSEPH, NO. 40, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI, K. NARAYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
584
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.062014 VIDE ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59167/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. C. CHOWRAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF LATE CHINNAPPA NO.44, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K.NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. V. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
585
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO. 31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT AL NO. 251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -J] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN -OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.59169/2016: BETWEEN: SMT. R. JAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS WIFE OF LATE V RAJU NO 114, 8TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B. V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 002
586
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560002
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 AT ANNEX-J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE, IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.61955/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. A. AROCKIA DASS AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF LATE A. AROCKIA SWAMY NO. 51, 2ND MAIN CHANDRA SHEKAR LAYOUT K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560 077.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
587
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560002
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 [ANNEXURE -K] IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.63205/2016: BETWEEN: SRI. I. AROKIA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SON OF LATE R. ISSAC NO 93, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE - 560077
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M. S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560001
588
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE - 560020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -J IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.2531/2017: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ASHA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS W/O N. KRISHNA RAO, RESIDENT OF NO.19/1 (OLD NO.10/1) 1ST FLOOR,9TH CROSS, SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003 2. HARISH KHANNA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O K. L. KHANNA, RESIDENT OF NO.E702,
589
RAINBOW VISTA, IDL ROAD, KUKKATPALLY, HYDERABAD-500 072 3. I. K. KHANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS SON OF M. L. KHANNA, RESIDENT OF NO.GA SHARAMALAYA II PRITHVI AVENUE, 2ND STREET,ABHIRAMAPURAM, CHENNAI-600 018
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DINESH RAO N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ARKAVATHY LAYOUT, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 ) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO REGULARIZE THE RESPECTIVE SITES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THEIR FAVOUR BY COLLECTING BETTERMENT CHARGES, AND IF IN CASE THERE IS ANY LEGAL IMPEDIMENT TO REGULARIZE GRANT ALTERNATIVE SITES TO PETITIONERS WITHIN REASONABLE TIME AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.5209/2017:
BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T. X. MATHEWS S/O LATE XAVIER AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
590
2. MRS. USHA MATHEWS W/O MR. T. X. MATHEWS AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS BOTH AT NO.41 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS GEDDALAHALLI K. NARYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31 GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX -L IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
591
IN W.P.NO.5212/2017:
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. PRAVEENA SHREE E. D/O M. EKAMBARAM AGED 36 YEARS
2. SMT. BRINDA E. SURESH D/O M EKAMBARAM AGED 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.63, 1ST MAIN 5TH CROSS, GEDDALAHALLI K. NARAYANAPURA POST BANGALORE-560 077
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA RAO B.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560 001
2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
592
PROPERTY FORMING PART OF LAND IN SY.NO.31, GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, INCLUDED AT SL.NO.251 OF THE 2ND FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNEX - L PASSED BY R-1 IS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, ARBITRARY AND NON-EST AND HENCE IN-OPERATIVE IN LAW AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.37478/2017:
BETWEEN:
SMT. GEETHA W/O. SUDHAKAR HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT 43 NISARGH, 3RD MAIN ROAD M. M. S. LAYOUT VIDHYARANYAPURA,
BANGALORE-560097 ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
593
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PRL.NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003 FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 AT ANNEX -G & H ISSUED BY R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SEC.24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT 30/2013) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SEC. 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.37480/2017: BETWEEN: SMT. K. NALINI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS W/O. P KRISHNAMURTHY R/AT 242 NEW NO.230 A.K.COLONY,B.S.A.ROAD CROSS, NEAR LITTLE BOBBIN SCHOOL, BANGALORE-560 005
...PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEGDE V. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, M. S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
594
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR.COUNSEL FOR SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.03 THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 23.02.2004 VIDE ANNEX-H, ISSUED BY THE R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 (CENTRAL ACT 30 OF 2013) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE NOTIFICATION IN VIEW OF THE DEEMED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24(2) OF THE NEW ACT AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.19783/2018: BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R. BHAGYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O. SRI. R. SHYAMPRASAD REDDY, 2. R. SHYAM PRASAD REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O. LATE. R T MALLAREDDY, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AT FLAT NO. 702, SAI KUTEER APARTMENT, SY. NO. 2/1, VIDYANAGAR, THANISANDRA VILLAGE, DR. SHIVARAMAKARANTH POST,
BENGALURU 560077. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. C M NAGABUSHANA, ADVOCATE)
595
AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. REP BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560020.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE
ACQUISITION PROCEEDINGS INITIATED VIDE PRELIMINARY
NOTIFICATION DATED 03.02.2003, ISSUED UNDER SECTION
17(1) OF THE BDA ACT, 1976 VIDE ANNEX -E BY THE R-2 &
NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 VIDE ANNX-F ISSUED BY THE
R-1 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ARE
CONCERNED AS LAPSED, IN VIEW OF SECTION 27 OF THE
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND
RESERVED FOR ORDERS, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
596
ORDER
In all these writ petitions, challenge is laid to the
Preliminary Notification No.BDA/CMMR/KLAO/LA19/
104/2002-03, BANGALORE, dated 03.02.2003, Final
Notification No.UDD 193 MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated
23.02.2004 and revised/modified Notification bearing No.UDD
426 MNJ 2011, BANGALORE dated 18.06.2014 issued under
Section 17(1) & (3) and sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the
Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (for short ‘BDA
Act’) respectively for the purposes of wit for the formation of
Layout called “ARKAVATI LAYOUT” at Bengaluru.
BRIEF HISTORY:
2. The Bangalore Development Authority (for short
‘BDA’) issued a Preliminary Notification under Section 17(3) of
the BDA Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land for formation
of Arkavati Layout on 03.02.2003. A modified Preliminary
Notification came to be issued on 16.09.2003 showing the
extent of land as 3,839 acres 12 guntas situated in the
following 16 villages:
1) Dasarahalli
2) Byrathikane
597
3) Challakere
4) Geddalahalli
5) K Narayanapura
6) Rachenahalli
7) Thanisandra
8) Amruthhalli
9) Jakkur
10) Kempapura
11) Sampigehalli
12) Srirampura
13) Venkateshpura
14) Hennur
15) Hebbala
16) Nagavara
3. Notices under Section 17(5) of the BDA Act was
issued and there was no objection received in respect of 91
acres 7 guntas. Objections received in respect of 2658 acres
were rejected. BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12 guntas of
land and to obtain sanction for 2750 acres. Accordingly, a
scheme formulated came to be sanctioned by the Government
of Karnataka (for short ‘State’) under Section 18(3) of the BDA
598
Act for 2750 acres of land. Final Notification dated 23.02.2004
came to be issued for acquisition of 2750 acres of land
situated in the aforesaid 16 villages. Awards came to be
passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres. BDA claims to have
taken possession in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land
and 459.16 acres of Government land and in all, 1919.13
acres of land. BDA claims to have formed the Layout by
carving 14103 plots/sites apart from developing the roads,
drains, civic amenity sites, etc.
4. The acquisition proceedings came to be questioned
before this court by filing writ petitions on several grounds
in W.P.Nos.51119-51132/2004 and connected matters. The
learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions by declaring
that BDA has no jurisdiction to frame developmental schemes
in Bangalore Metropolitan Area amongst granting other reliefs.
This order was challenged in Writ Appeal No.2625/2005 and
connected matters. Since some of the writ petitions had also
been filed challenging acquisition of lands for the formation of
“Arkavati Layout” on the grounds, which had been upheld by
the learned Single Judge, they were also taken up for
consideration by Division Bench since identical questions of
599
law and fact arose for consideration along with writ appeals.
The Division Bench in the matter of THE COMMISSIONER
BDA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS
SECRETARY reported in ILR 2006 KAR 318 (hereinafter
referred to as "Division Bench") by order dated 25.11.2005
allowed the writ appeals filed by the BDA and State, and set
aside the order dated 15.04.2005 passed by the learned Single
Judge and dismissed the challenge laid to acquisition of lands
for formation of Arkavati Layout. The acquisition of lands
came to be upheld by Division Bench subject to the conditions
stipulated thereunder.
5. In fact, Division Bench was also persuaded by the
Memo filed by BDA, which was also taken note of by the
Division Bench while issuing directions.
6. The order passed by the Division Bench of this
Court came to be challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court
and after considering the rival contentions, Hon’ble Apex Court
in the matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS vs
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS
reported in (2010) 7 SCC 129 (hereinafter referred to as
600
“BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case”) upheld the decision of the
Division Bench, subject to BDA’s actions to take certain
corrective measures by requiring it to reexamine certain
aspects and provide an option to the land losers to secure
some additional benefit as an incentive to accept the
acquisition. In other words, directions issued by the Division
Bench noted supra was affirmed subject to further directions
and clarifications issued thereunder. The Hon’ble Apex Court
had also observed that all allotments made by BDA either by
forming Layouts or by way of bulk allotments, would be
subject to the modified directions issued, extracted herein
above.
7. Pursuant to said clarification and directions issued
by Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA is said to have undertaken the
exercise and in the process, has recommended certain lands to
be excluded from entire acquisition by submitting re-modified
scheme for approval by the appropriate Government and in
terms of the order dated 03.04.2014 (Annexure-C in
W.P.No.59219/2014) has approved the same.
601
8. By virtue of aforesaid order passed by the Hon’ble
Apex Court and keeping in view the additional directions
issued, the State issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011
declaring that land owners are entitled for allotment of
developed plots in the ratio of 60:40 in 55% of the land
acquired after deducting the land to be utilized for civic
amenity purposes.
9. The BDA pursuant to directions issued has
conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by
examining the applications and representations submitted by
various applicants and placed the said report before the Board
of BDA. Subsequently, BDA has approved the report and
restricted the total area to 176.07 acres of land for acquisition
by deleting 983.33 guntas vide resolution No.79/2013 dated
12.02.2013. The deleted lands measuring 983.33 guntas
included 198 acres 20 guntas of denotified lands and 83 acre 8
guntas of land in respect of which acquisition proceedings had
been already quashed in different cases. On the report
submitted by the BDA forwarded to the Government, the State
issued a modified scheme and thereafter the Notification dated
18.06.2014 came to be issued, under which an extent of 1766
602
acres 7 guntas of land was sought to be acquired. It is this
Notification which has been challenged in these writ petitions
apart from challenging the earlier Notification also by some of
the petitioners.
CONTENTIONS OF PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:
10. Sum and substance of the grievance of the
petitioners in these writ petitions revolves around the following
contentions:
10.1 Some of the writ petitions have been filed by the
bonafide allottees of the sites formed by BDA in Arkavati
Layout, pursuant to which possession certificates have been
issued and Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of the
respective sites allotted to them have also been executed. They
have also sought for direction to the BDA to issue either
possession certificate or execute Lease cum Sale Agreement or
absolute sale deed and for issuance of khata.
10.2 In few of the writ petitions like W.P.No.42063/2012
and other matters, the Notification issued under sub-section(1)
of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘LA
Act’), which came to be issued by the State withdrawing the
603
lands specified thereunder from acquisition has been called in
question contending interalia that pursuant to Preliminary and
Final Notification issued, BDA has formed the layout and sites
have been allotted to them and Lease cum Sale Deed have also
been executed in their favour and they are in possession and
enjoyment of the sites and as such Government could not have
denotified certain lands by withdrawing from acquisition.
10.3. Pursuant to the directions issued by the Division
Bench and further modified directions issued by the Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, representations
have been submitted by several owners of the land contending
interalia that their claim would fall within the four corners of
the said directions. The said representations having been
considered by the BDA and having rejected, land owners have
filed writ petitions.
10.4 Whereas, few writ petitions like W.P.No.638/2014
have been filed challenging the acquisition proceedings
culminating in issuance of the Final Notification dated
18.06.2014 contending interalia that acquisition is deemed to
have lapsed under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation
604
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 (for short ‘ New LA Act’) on account of
possession having not been taken.
10.5 Yet, few writ petitions have been filed by land
owners for deletion of their respective lands on the ground of
further directions issued in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case
would enure to their benefit. In other words, they have sought
to raise a plea that on account of lands adjacent to the lands
owned by them having been deleted, the land owned by them
has become landlocked.
SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTIONS RAISED:
11. It is contended that representations submitted by
the land owners had been considered under Section 17(5) of
the BDA Act and a Notification under Section 19 of the said
Act came to be issued, which is bad in law since acquisition
proceedings have already been upheld by this court and the
Hon’ble Apex Court and BDA has been directed only to
consider the representation and as such, there was no need or
necessity for issuance of Notification dated 18.06.2014 once
again under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act. It is also contended
605
that Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has
directed the BDA to consider the representations of the land
owners as to discrimination meted out to similarly placed land
owners and instead of complying with the said direction, BDA
has recommended the Government to denotify several lands
which is contrary to the dicta laid down by Hon’ble Apex
Court. It is also contended that Second Final Notification (for
short ‘SFN’) dated 18.06.2014 is without authority of law , as
BDA Act does not provide for the same and it has been issued
under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which has been
repealed. It is also contended that SFN has been issued
without application of mind. Elaborating on this, it is
contended that under SFN, 1766.05 guntas of land have been
sought to be acquired and approximately, 500 acres of
Government land has been wrongly notified which includes ‘B’
kharab lands. It is contended that Government has not
passed any order under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act to divert ‘B’ kharab land for formation of a
Layout. Moreover, 20,000 sites are sought to be formed in an
area of 2750 acres initially and on account of reduction in the
extent namely, confining the acquisition to 1766.05 acres, it
would indicate that scheme cannot be implemented, as most of
606
the said lands are tank bed, gomala etc. wherein Layout
cannot be formed. It is also contended that Section 503-C of
Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 by which
Planning Authority is constituted, the Bangalore Metropolitan
Planning Authority ( for short BMPA) is required to draw a
scheme for Bangalore Metropolitan Area and State cannot
exercise the power of BMPA by issuing the impugned
Notification.
11.1 Yet other forceful argument which has been
canvassed relates to the lands which are sought to be acquired
is landlocked and/or similarly placed as that of lands which
have been denotified. As such, there is hostile discrimination.
11.2 It is further contended that Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case has clearly held that Layout
cannot be formed by BDA in bits and pieces or in scattered
Layouts, inasmuch as, continuous Layout cannot be formed
and as such, Notification is liable to be set aside. It is further
submitted that SFN is hit by the provisions of New LA Act and
on account of award having not been passed pursuant to the
SFN and possession of lands having not been taken,
607
acquisition proceedings are deemed to have been lapsed. It is
also contended that neither award amount is paid nor
deposited and as such, acquisition proceedings have lapsed.
11.3 It is further contended that erstwhile land owners
have formed revenue Layout prior to Preliminary Notification
and therefore they ought to have been served with a notice of
acquisition and in the absence thereof, it has to be necessarily
held as acquisition having been lapsed. Drawing the attention
of court to the photographs produced along with writ petitions,
it is contended that there are residential buildings constructed
by petitioners in the lands in question and they are in
existence since long and as such, acquisition of such lands
cannot be proceeded with. They have further contended that
Land Acquisition Officers (for short LAO) have themselves
recommended for exclusion of lands in their reports, which
has not been considered and same have been included in SFN.
11.4 Learned advocates appearing for petitioners have
contended that BDA has issued different and inconsistent
endorsements after considering the representations of the
petitioners. They would contend that sketch issued by one
608
LAO would depict the area as deleted, which has been changed
by another LAO depicting that same has been acquired. On
account of scheme having not been implemented under
Section 27, it is deemed to have lapsed since within five (5)
years from the date of first Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,
the scheme has not been implemented.
11.5 For the purposes of convenience, contentions
raised in some of the writ petitions including the common
contentions referred to herein above are enumerated below:
W.P.No.51929/2014 & Connected Matters:
12. Preliminary Notification under section 17(3) of BDA
Act for acquisition of 3339 acres of land in the 16 villages
aforestated for formation of Arkavati Layout came to be issued
on 03.02.2003 and subsequently, on 16.09.2003 modified
Preliminary Notification was issued proposing thereunder to
acquire 3839 acres 12 guntas in the said 16 villages. After
issuance of notice under Section 17(5) of BDA Act and on
receipt of objections, BDA resolved to delete 1089 acres 12
guntas land and sought for sanction/approval of the scheme
for 2750 acres of land and submitted the proposal to the
609
appropriate Government which in turn, sanctioned the scheme
under Section 18(3) of the BDA Act. It is thereafter Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be issued for acquiring
2750 acres of land situated in the aforestated 16 villages.
After conducting an enquiry, award is said to have been
passed to an extent of 1618.38 acres and possession claims to
have been taken in respect of 1459.37 acres of private land
and 459.16 acres of Government land, thus in all, 1919.13
acres of land has been acquired for formation of the Layout. It
is also stated that BDA has formed a Layout by laying or
forming 14103 plots apart from constructing roads, culverts,
drains, etc. however, said Notifications both Preliminary and
Final were under challenge before this court in various writ
petitions and said writ petitions came to be allowed by order
dated 15.04.2005 (in W.P.Nos.26601-04/2004 and connected
matters (reported in ILR 2005 KAR 3710)) and acquisition
proceedings initiated by BDA came to be quashed. As already
noticed herein above, Division Bench in W.A.Nos.2624-
25/2005 by order dated 25.11.2005 allowed the writ appeals,
set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge
upholding the scheme subject to conditions/directions issued
thereunder. Directions/ order of Division Bench of this Court
610
came to be affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra. Hon’ble Apex Court in
the directions/clarification issued has made it explicitly clear
that any allotment made by BDA either by forming a Layout or
by way of bulk allotments would be subject to such directions
and clarification issued.
12.1 Subsequent to order/directions issued by Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, State Government
has issued a Notification dated 18.03.2011 declaring that land
owners are entitled to plots in the ratio of 40:60 namely, 40%
to land owners and 60% to BDA after deducting the land
utilised for civic amenities, parks, roads, drainages, culverts,
etc. In the light of directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, it
was to the effect that acquisition of lands in Kempapura and
Srirampura is concerned, BDA should reconsider objections to
the acquisition having regard to the fact that large areas were
not initially notified for acquisition and more than 50% of
whatever that was notified for acquisition, was also
subsequently deleted from acquisition. BDA has to consider
whether in view of deletion to a large extent, development with
respect to balance of the acquired lands has become illogical
611
and impractical and if so, whether balance area also should be
deleted from acquisition. It was further directed that if BDA
still proposes to continue the acquisition, it shall file a report
within four (4) months before the High Court so that
consequential orders can be passed. Insofar as villages of
Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where
there are small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by
lands, which were not acquired or which were deleted from the
proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small
pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for
forming self contained Layouts since acquisition thereof
cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of
acquired land, could be used as a stand-alone park or
playground in regard to a Layout formed in different
unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets
in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.
As such, observing/clarifying these aspects, directions came to
be issued by Hon’ble Apex Court that BDA should give option
to each of the writ petitioners whose lands have been acquired
for the Arkavati Layout to accept allotment for 15% of the land
acquired from him by way of developed plots in lieu of
compensation, any fractions in excess of 15% may be charged
612
at prevailing rates of allotment or where extent of land
acquired exceeds half an acre, to claim in addition to
compensation (without prejudice to seek reference, if he is not
satisfied with the quantum), allotment of a plot measuring 30’
x 40’ for every half acre of land acquired at the prevailing
allotment price and accordingly, directed BDA to undertake
such exercise. It is in this background, BDA is said to have
conducted an enquiry through Land Acquisition Officers by
receiving various applications/representations filed by the
applicants and after conducting such enquiry, has placed
report before the Board of BDA, who in turn has approved the
report and scaled down or reduced the extent of acquisition of
the lands for formation of Arkavati Layout to 1760 acres of
land by deleting yet another 983 acres 33 guntas of land. The
appropriate Government after having perused the said
proposal, is said to have approved and re-modified the scheme
and accordingly, impugned Notification has been issued for
formation for Arkavati Layout.
W.P.30731/2014:
13. It is the contention of Mr. Bharath Kumar V.,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that order passed
613
by this court on 17.10.2017 calling upon BDA to produce the
original records to establish the fact that land in question has
been acquired, Layout has been formed and sites have been
allotted to the applicants and BDA has failed to produce the
records. Hence, he prays that an adverse inference may be
drawn in favour of petitioner and against the BDA.
13.1 He would also submit that the land which is the
subject matter of present writ petition would fall within the
parameters prescribed by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case namely, on all the three sites, lands
which were also proposed to be acquired has been de-notified
on account of said land being fully developed, as such land
belonging to the petitioner is a land locked. Hence, he prays
for acquisition insofar as the petitioner’s land is concerned to
be quashed.
13.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 would defend the
acquisition proceedings.
614
W.P.No.36525/2016:
14. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing
Sy.No.1/1 measuring 25 guntas situated at Ammanibyrathi
Kane Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
14.1 Petitioners claim title to the property under
registered sale deed dated 20.05.1946 and subsequent
partition on 15.10.1982. It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri
Rao, learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire
area is built up and hence, they would fall within the
parameters fixed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. It is also contended that it is a patta
land. Revenue records would also indicate that same has not
been mutated to the names of petitioners and it continues to
reflect the name of Government as owner of the land. On
these grounds, they have sought for deletion of their land from
acquisition. They would also rely upon the photographs
produced to contend that entire surrounding area is built up.
W.P. No. 35204/2014:
15. Petitioners are claiming to be the owners of sites
formed out of Survey No.97/2 of Jakkur Village having
615
purchased the same in the year 1999 and contending that on
08.05.1999 itself the land was converted for non-
agricultural/residential purposes. It is submitted by the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that after
purchasing the sites petitioners have put up structures
namely, residential building as evident from the photographs
produced at Annexures – B1 and B6 and C1 and C9 and katha
is also mutated in the respective names of petitioners and
taxes are being collected and when this was the factual
position, out of blue Preliminary and Final Notification came to
be issued proposing to acquire the said lands and petitioner
has submitted that on account of property having been build
up, dicta laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable. As such he
prays for allowing the writ petition.
W.P.No.37446/2014:
16. It is contended that scheduled sites are formed out
of composite land bearing original Sy.Nos.103/1, 103/2,
103/3, 103/4, 103/5 at Rachenahalli Village in which Sy.No.3
was converted way back on 17.07.1992 and petitioners have
put up construction and lands in question are landlocked
616
lands and as such, it would fall within four corners of
directions/clarification issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160(ii) and as such
continuation of acquisition of sites in question would be
contrary to the directions issued by the Apex Court. Hence, he
seeks for allowing the petition and quashing of proceedings.
16.1 Per contra, Sri. Bipin Hegde, learned counsel
appearing for respondents would support the acquisition
proceedings and prays for dismissal of the petition. He would
also reiterate the grounds urged in the statement of objections
and would contend that award has been passed and
possession of land has been taken over by BDA and handed
over to Engineering Section and BDA has formed a Layout and
there has been substantial implementation of the scheme.
Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
16.2 Though, learned Advocate appearing for petitioner
has contended that lands in question are the lands which have
already been deleted and relies upon the Layout plan
(Annexure-D). For the present, it cannot be relied upon and it
is neither counter signed by any statutory authorities nor they
617
would indicate as to survey numbers in which sites have been
formed or carved out. As to whether the sites in question
would form part of Sy.No.103/4 of Rachenahalli village is
disputed question of fact which cannot be called into in writ
jurisdiction.
16.3 Elaborating his submission, learned Advocate
appearing for petitioner would contend that on all the three
sides of Sy.No.103/4, lands which were proposed for
acquisition have been deleted and as such, land in
Sy.No.103/4 is to be construed as an island as indicated in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as such, petitioner is
entitled for deletion of said land from acquisition.
16.4 Per contra, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would contend that possession of
Sy.No.103/4 has been taken and sites have been formed and
24 sites have been formed out of which six (6) sites have
already been allotted by relying upon document produced
along with I.A.No.1/2019.
618
W.P.No.38463/2014:
17. Petitioners claim to be the owners of Site No.9
carved out of Sy.No.141/1 of Challakere Village, K.R.Puram
Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, having purchased the same
under registered sale deed dated 27.02.2013 from
Sri.M.C.Narayanaswamy, who had purchased from Sri.C.Santa
Maria under a registered sale deed dated 17.03.2004 –
Annexures-A and B respectively. It is the grievance of
petitioners that said property had been purchased by them for
putting up residential building and accordingly, they have
constructed residential building which has since been
demolished by BDA. It is the grievance of petitioners that their
claim has not been considered in terms of law laid down by
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case. Hence, petitioners have sought for quashing of Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004 – Annexure-F and Notification
dated 18.06.2014 – Annexure-G on the ground that said
Notifications are illegal.
17.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent Nos. - 2 and 3 would support the
acquisition proceedings and contends that petitioner is not
619
entitled for any of the relief sought for, inasmuch as, they were
not notified khatedars; no application was filed for registering
their names as directed by Division Bench of this Court and
construction of the house has come up subsequent to
Preliminary Notification. On these grounds, respondent Nos.-2
and 3 have sought for dismissal of the petition.
17.2 It is an undisputed fact that petitioner had
purchased the property in question on 27.02.2013 i.e.,
subsequent to Preliminary and Final Notification issued by the
BDA. Petitioners have not submitted any representation to
BDA. Even in the absence of their claim of BDA having not
considered their plea, in the background of Division Bench
judgment and BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case will have to be
considered.
W.P.No.39832/2014:
18. Petitioner claims to be the owner of lands bearing
Sy.Nos.129/2, 133/1, 133/2 & 133/3 measuring 25 guntas,
32 guntas, 6 guntas and 5 guntas respectively situated at
Challakere village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
He has questioned acquisition Notification relating to Arkavati
620
Layout. Undisputedly, challenge to said Notification has
reached Finality before Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant to same, petitioner is
said to have submitted representation and endorsement dated
07.01.2011 came to be issued by BDA, which was questioned
by petitioners in W.P.Nos.7049-7052/2011. Claim of the
petitioner have not been considered in the light of directions
and observations made by Hon’ble Apex Court in paragraph
160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case referred to supra, Co-
ordinate Bench quashed the same by order dated 01.02.2012
passed in said writ petitions and directed respondent–BDA to
re-consider the representation/application submitted by
petitioner for deletion of his land from acquisition.
18.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that said
representation having been submitted on 27.06.2014, without
considering the same, subsequent Notification has been
issued. Hence, petitioner is seeking for quashing of
Notification.
621
18.2 Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner has
reiterated the contentions raised and grounds urged in the writ
petitions.
18.3 Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would draw the attention of the Court to
Annexures-R1 to R8 produced along with statement of
objections to contend that except sporadic constructions
having been put-up in the lands acquired, major portion of the
land has been lying vacant as per the mahazar drawn and
possession of said land has been taken way back in the year
2004 itself. It is also contended that sites have already been
formed in the said lands and as such, he prays for dismissal of
the petitions.
W.P.No.43815/2014:
19. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property
bearing Site No.206. The said site has been carved out of
Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1, 48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli
village measuring East to West 81.6 feet and North to South 48
feet. He is seeking for quashing of the Notification dated
18.06.2014 insofar as his property is concerned.
622
19.1 It is the contention of Sri. Narayana Rao H.R,
learned Advocate appearing for petitioner that said site has
been formed by the vendor of petitioner after obtaining
conversion order of said land and pursuant to purchase, she
has put up construction over the property and residing therein
after obtaining electricity and water connection from the
statutory authorities and as such khata is also made out and
revenue records have been mutated in the name of petitioner
in the records of BBMP and as such, at this length of time, if
the property is acquired, she would be put to hardship as it is
the only property which is available to her. He would also
elaborate his submission by contending that entire property,
which petitioner had purchased, has been safeguarded by
putting up compound wall and it is in her possession and
enjoyment and as such, he seeks for quashing of the
impugned Notification. He would also contend that the
adjacent properties are fully developed and there is no land left
for BDA to make any development pursuant to this scheme.
19.2 Per contra, learned counsel appearing for BDA has
supported the acquisition insofar as Sy.Nos.45/1, 45/6, 48/1,
623
48/2, 54 and 47 of Dasarahalli village. It is also contended
that petitioner is a subsequent purchaser and as such she has
no locus standi to file a petition. He would reiterate the
grounds urged in the statement of objections by contending
that all schemes have been implemented insofar as
Dasarahalli village is concerned and as such question of
granting any relief to the petitioner does not arise as
petitioner’s case would not fall within the parameter laid down
by the Division Bench and as affirmed and modified by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he
prays for rejection of the petition.
19.3 Having heard the learned counsel appearing for
petitioner and respondents, it would emerge from the very
Notification that undisputedly, petitioner has purchased the
property in the year 2004 i.e., under sale deed dated
17.9.2004 and Preliminary Notification came to be issued on
03.02.2003 followed by Final Notification dated 23.02.2004.
Thus, petitioner having purchased the property on 17.09.2004,
which is subsequent to Notification dated 23.02.2004 and
before Notification dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure-A), the only
issue which would required to be considered is as to what
624
relief the petitioner would be entitled to in the background of
parameters fixed by the Division Bench of this Court as
affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case whereunder clarification and further directions came to
be issued.
W.P.Nos.44306/2014:
20. In these writ petitions, petitioners who are claiming
to be the purchasers of sites from Talakaveri Housing
Cooperative Building Society are contending interalia that they
have purchased the sites under registered sale deeds and said
sale deeds have come into existence prior to impugned
Notifications.
20.1 Sri.B.M.Halaswamy, learned counsel appearing for
petitioners would also elaborate his submission by contending
that land measuring 8 acres was converted and a
memorandum of understanding was entered into between the
then land owner - Sri. K. Gundu Rao along with Talakaveri
Housing Cooperative Building Society, pursuant to which
conversion of land was obtained and sites came to be formed
by the Society and sale deeds were executed on behalf of
625
Sri.Gundu Rao by Talakaveri Housing Cooperative Building
Society.
20.2 He would submit that BDA had recognized sale
deeds executed in favour of allottees till death of Sri.Gundu
Rao and subsequent to his death, sale deeds executed have
been not recognized. He would also submit that suit filed by
the deceased Gundu Rao has also been withdrawn and as
such acquisition of lands, insofar, as petitioners are concerned
be dropped in the background of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case
keeping in mind the adjacent land has also been dropped from
the acquisition.
20.3 Per contra, Sri.M.N.Ramanjaneya, learned Standing
Counsel appearing for BDA would submit that petitioners are
only agreement holders and does not have any right over the
property and as such petitioners would not be entitled for the
relief sought for. He would also submit that BDA has formed
Layout in the said 8 acres of land and allotted sites in favour of
applicants and possession also having been delivered, they are
waiting for Lease cum Sale Deeds having been executed in
626
favour of allottees. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ
petition.
W.P.No.46766/2014:
24. Petitioner is the owner of land bearing Survey
No.14/1 situated at Thanisandra Village measuring 1 acre 20
guntas. He is seeking for a writ of mandamus to delete the said
land from acquisition proceedings as it has been included in
Final Notification dated 23.02.2004 Annexure-B.
24.1 It is the contention of Sri.Vikhar Ahmed B., learned
counsel appearing for petitioner that claim of petitioner would
fall within the four corners of paragraph-160(2) of BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, inasmuch as, lands adjacent and
abutting to petitioner’s land has been denotified by the BDA
namely, Survey No.12/7 on eastern side and remaining
portion of Survey Nos.14/1 and 66/6. Hence, he seeks for land
belonging to petitioner also being set aside.
24.2 Per contra, Sri K.Krishna, learned counsel
appearing for respondent-BDA seeks for dismissal of writ
petition on the ground that lands abutting to petitioner’s land
namely, Survey Nos.13 and 14/2 on northern and southern
sides respectively are acquired, possession taken, sites carved
out and as such, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
627
24.3 Having heard learned Advocates counsel appearing
for parties and on perusal of records, it requires to be noticed
that in the instant case, undisputedly petitioner was also a
party to earlier round of proceedings. Division Bench while
disposing of writ appeal on 25.11.2005 granting succor to land
owners at paragraph-106(D)(i), gave liberty to applicants to
submit appropriate applications to the authorities seeking
such exclusion and exemption from acquisition by producing
documents to substantiate their contentions within one month
from the date of that order and indicating thereunder that they
would be at liberty to demonstrate that their lands are situated
within green belt area or they are totally built up or properties
where there are buildings constructed by Charitable,
Educational and Religious Institutions or nursery lands or who
have set up factories or their lands are similar to the lands,
which are adjoining the lands but not notified for acquisition
at all. Undisputedly, petitioner did not submit any application
or representation to the BDA. However, now petitioner is
attempting to take umbrage on account of matter pending
before the Hon’ble Apex Court, even though no application was
filed before BDA as ordered by Division Bench. Even
otherwise, the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
628
case which came to be disposed of on 05.05.2010, as already
noticed hereinabove, apart from confirming/affirming the
judgment of learned Single Judge and affirming acquisition
proceedings had also further clarified that BDA can consider
whether small pockets of acquired lands and surrounded
lands, which are not acquired for the purposes of deletion are
not suitable for forming self contained Layout. Hence, said
benefit was extended to those persons namely, owners of lands
to pursue their grievances before the BDA by submitting
representations and BDA was directed to consider such
representations in accordance with direction issued by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Pursuant
to same, BDA has undertaken exercise of redoing the whole
issue namely, examining claim of land owners. At that point of
time also, there was no representation submitted by petitioner
or representation, if any, filed earlier was pending. Hence, no
fault can be found on the BDA in this regard. However, it is
seen in many instances, that BDA in compliance of direction
issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case, suo motu has undertaken exercise to delete certain lands
on the premise that it would fall within the parameters fixed
either by the Division Bench or by the Hon’ble Apex Court
629
clarified in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and accordingly, in
many instances, it has dropped lands from acquisition or in
other words, lands which were proposed to be acquired under
Notification dated 23.02.2004 came to be deleted. It is
thereafter Notification dated 18.06.2014 came to be issued.
Even immediately thereafter or within a reasonable period,
petitioner did not make any representation. In other words,
petitioner can be termed as a fence-sitter or who had slept over
his right, if any and without seeking for deletion of land
included in Notification dated 18.06.2014, still petitioner is
clinging to Notification dated 23.02.2004, which has got
eclipsed by virtue of Notification dated 18.06.2014.
W.P.No.47107/2014:
25. Petitioner claims to be the Khatedar of the land
bearing Survey No.61/3 of Amruthahalli Village, Yelahanka
Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, measuring 10 guntas. It is
contended that said land is bounded on the east by
Sy.No.61/4, west by Sy.No.61/3, north by Sy.No.38 and south
by Sy.No.62. It is contended in the SFN dated 18.06.2014 first
respondent has excluded Sy.No.61/4 and 62/1, which were
vacant agricultural lands as on the date Preliminary
Notification dated 23.02.2004 (Annexure-A) was issued and
630
though petitioner's land had been developed even prior to
Preliminary Notification and were entitled to be treated on par
with the lands excluded from acquisition namely, Sy.No.61/4
and 62/1, same benefit has not been extended to the
petitioners. Thus, contending that there is discrimination
between two (2) similarly placed persons and Division Bench
judgment as well as dicta laid in BONDU RAMASWAMY's have
not been correctly applied to the claim of petitioner, he has
sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014
(Annexure-C). Contending that there is clause discrimination
between 2 person who are equally placed, challenge to the
impugned notification is laid. It is also contended that lands
belonging to the Government, which had been reserved for
public purposes have not been declassified as required under
Section 97 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act namely, there
is no order passed for diversion of the said lands. It is also
contended that non alienable 'B' kharab lands are also wrongly
notified for acquisition and hence, acquisition has to be set
aside. These amongst other grounds, urged in the connected
writ petitions and reiterating the same petitioner has sought
for writ petition being allowed.
631
25.1 Per contra, Sri.G.Lakshmeesha Rao, learned
counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has reiterated
the averments made in the statement of objections and
adopting the arguments addressed by Sri.Nanjunda Reddy,
learned Senior Counsel who has appeared on behalf of BDA,
he prays for dismissal of the petition.
W.P.Nos.47608/2014
26. Petitioners claims to be the purchasers of sites 157,
157A - Annexures –A and A1 respectively carved out of
Sy.No.45/6 of Dasarahalli Village. It is contended that in the
light of direction issued by the Division Bench that BDA is
required to examine the claim of petitioners.
26.1 Though Sri. K. Krishna, learned counsel appearing
for BDA is justified in contending that petitioners have not got
registered themselves for considering their request, fact
remains that under similar circumstances even where the
applicants were the revenue sites holders had approached this
Court in the earlier round of litigation or having not submitted
the representations, have been directed by this Court to
consider the claim of applicants in the teeth of directions
issued by the Division Bench and as such, it requires to be
examined as to whether petitioners would also be entitled to
632
similar reliefs or any other relief though claim of petitioners for
deletion of lands insofar as sites purchased by them concerned
would not hold water.
W.P.No.47731/2014:
27. It is the contention of the petitioner that he is the
owner of the land measuring 1 acre 37 guntas in Survey
No.72/2 of Thanisandra Village having acquired the same by
way of succession.
27.1 Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that
petitioner has constructed a house as reflected in Annexure-H
and they are residing therein. Neither the Preliminary
Notification nor Final Notification or the modified Notification
reflected the correct name of petitioner and as such, petitioner
had no notice of the acquisition proceedings till 2014. He
would submit that the adjacent properties which were allotted
to the shares of his brothers have been left out from the
acquisition, as they are built up area and all the three sites of
the petitioner’s property the buildings have coming up, as
such the judgment of Apex Court rendered in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case would be squarely applicable to
petitioner’s claim and hence he prays for land bearing Survey
633
No.72/2 measuring 1 acre 37 guntas be dropped from the
acquisition proceedings.
27.2 Per contra, Sri M.B. Prabhakar, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 would support the
Notification and he would adopt the arguments addressed by
Sri B.N. Nanjundareddy, learned Senior Counsel who had
appeared on behalf of the BDA.
W.P.No.48880/2014:
28. Heard Sri.Somashekhar, learned Advocate
appearing for petitioner. Respondents are served and
unrepresented. No statement of objections has been filed.
28.1 Petitioner who claims to be the owner of 0.5¼
guntas of land in Sy.No.85/3 situated at Amruthahalli,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk is seeking for deletion
of said extent of land from Final Notification contending
interalia that on three sides of land in question namely,
Sy.Nos.86, 84 and 115 situated on the northern, eastern and
southern sides have been deleted and as such, there is no
reason for the BDA to continue with the acquisition of land
insofar as land owned by the petitioners. Hence, contending
that further directions and clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at paragraph 160 would
634
squarely be applicable to the case of petitioners, he prays for
deletion of land from acquisition.
28.2 The working plan insofar as Amruthahalli village
furnished by learned Advocate appearing for BDA in the
connected matters would disclose that to the north of
Sy.No.85/3, land bearing Sy.No.84 has been deleted, on the
eastern side, Sy.No.86 (portion) has been deleted and even on
the southern side, there is ‘nala’, above which, there is vacant
space, which is also not included in the acquisition
proceedings. Therefore, on all the three sides of Sy.No.85/3
namely, north, east and south lands as referred to herein
above has not been acquired by BDA.
28.3 In the impugned order (Annexure-F), consideration
seems to have been made by BDA pursuant to the direction
issued by the Division Bench of this Court and not in the light
of clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. In fact, there is no reference to the
judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the impugned
endorsement. There is no statement of objections filed by BDA
indicating that said exercise was undertaken by BDA to
examine claim of the petitioner.
635
W.P. No.51294/2014:
29. Respondent No.9 is claiming right over the site
No.198, which is said to have been purchased by him from the
erstwhile owner Smt.Saroja under registered Sale Deed dated
20.12.2014 formed out of Survey No.82/2/14 of Thanisandra
Village, contending inter alia that said Saroja was the owner of
land bearing Survey No.35/2 of Thanisandra Village,
measuring 1 acre 1 ½ guntas and in view of she giving up her
right to the said land, which was acquired by the BDA for
formation of Arkavati Layout under the extract scheme
operating, she has been allotted the site wherein site bearing
No. Survey No.198, which has since been sold by her to the 9th
respondent, as such acquisition of land bearing Survey
No.82/2/14 by the BDA is justified and hence, he has prayed
for dismissal of the petition.
W.P.No.52760/2014:
30. Petitioners who own property bearing Sy.No.13/3A
measuring 22 guntas situated at Jakkur village, Yelahanka
Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk are before this Court with a
prayer to delete said land from acquisition.
636
30.1 It is the contention of petitioners that said land is
surrounded by Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B, which
have not been notified and as such, petitioners claim would
fall within the parameters of clarification/direction issued by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide
paragraph 160(ii).
30.2 Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate
appearing on behalf of Sri.M.B.Prabhakar for respondent-BDA
would support the action of respondent in acquiring the land
in question and by reiterating the grounds urged in the
statement of objections, he would contend that possession of
land has been taken, sites have been formed and as such,
considering the claim of petitioners for deletion of land in
question would be inappropriate, he prays for dismissal of the
petition.
W.P.No.54358/2014:
31. Petitioners claim to be the owners of 18 guntas of
land situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli village,
K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk. They have sought for
quashing of acquisition proceedings under impugned
Notification dated 18.06.2014.
637
31.1 It is the contention of Sri.N.Sonnegowda, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that though petitioners’
names were mutated in the revenue records, none of the
impugned Notifications reflected their names. He would also
submit that land in question measures about 18 guntas and is
an isolated pocket surrounded by land bearing Sy.Nos.81/2A,
81/2B, 82 , 83/1, 81/3A, 84/2 and portion of 81/3B, which
lands have been excluded and respondent – BDA by pick and
choose method has sought to acquire land in question
belonging to the petitioners and as such, he has sought for
said land being dropped from the acquisition proceedings. He
would also draw the attention of Court to paragraph 160(ii) of
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case to contend that claim of
petitioner would fall within four corners of the said
directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex Court.
31.2 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for respondent-BDA that 28 sites have been formed in said
land and 8 sites have been allotted.
31.3 Perusal of the working plan and plan approved by
the Commissioner-BDA, insofar, as it relates to Rachenahalli
village, it would disclose that land measuring 18 guntas in
638
Sy.No.81/3B, which is sought to be acquired, is bounded on
east by Sy.Nos.81/2A & 81/2B, west by halla and Sy.No.82 &
83/1, north by Sy.No.81/3B (excluded major portion) and
84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A and all these three lands have
been notified for acquisition.
W.P.No.56748/2014:
32. Learned counsel appearing for BDA has furnished
details of the sites formed in the Arkavati Layout, which is
village vice and in respect of the same, it has depicted the
number of sites formed. However, details of sites are not
forthcoming. For instance in Thanisandra village bearing
Sy.Nos.1/1 to 14/1 the details of the sites formed is not
forthcoming. However, in respect of Sy.No.17/5 (subject
matter of W.P.No.56748-775/2014) BDA claims to have formed
sites bearing Sy.Nos.403 to 409, 410 to 413, 416 to 426, 385,
386, 387, 388 and 389. Names of the allottees in respect of
Sy.Nos.410, 413, 416 to 426 are reflected; as to whether these
sites are within the area, which has been constructed or not,
details are not forthcoming. On the other hand, petitioners
claim to have purchased sites and have also contended that
they have constructed residential buildings and are residing
therein and photographs produced at Annexures-D to F, H1
639
would disclose several buildings have come up. BDA by
endorsement dated 18.12.2015 -Annexure-W has also
intimated the Secretary, AAR Employees Society to remit
Rs.1,10,00,000/- towards development charges.
32.1 In that view of the matter, it has been ascertained
by actual examination as to whether the sites which are
sought to be deleted from the acquisition would fall within the
zone of sites already formed by BDA and allotted to third
parties and if there are such allottees, they will have to
necessarily allot alternate sites to such of the allottees.
W.P. No.58829/2014:
33. Sri.M.B.Prabhakar, learned counsel for respondent
Nos.2 and 3 would contend that predecessors in title of
petitioner were parties to the proceedings in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’S case, wherein, the challenge was laid to the
legality of acquisition proceedings of Arkavati Layout and same
having laid to rest, petitioners cannot have any independent
leg to stand and as such, he has prayed for dismissal of the
petition by reiterating the contentions raised in the statement
of objections.
640
W.P.No.18814/2015:
34. Petitioner claims to be the owner of property
bearing Sy.No.94/7 measuring 1 acre situated at Thanisandra,
K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore.
34.1 On account of representation submitted by
petitioner having not been considered, petitioner had
approached this court in W.P.No.23964/2014 and this court
by order dated 28.11.2014 (Annexure-E) directed the
respondent-BDA to consider the said representation.
Pursuant to the same, petitioner submitted one more
representation on 19.12.2014 –Annexure-F, which was
adjudicated by respondent-BDA and issued an endorsement
dated 20.04.2015 rejecting the request of petitioner.
34.2 Photographs produced along with the petition
would indicate that at an undisputed point of time, it was
virgin land. Mahazar produced along with statement of
objections filed by respondent Nos.-1 and 2 would indicate
that possession of the land has been taken on 30.06.2006 and
Notification under Section 16(2) of the Act has been issued.
That apart, sites have been formed and have been allotted to
third parties/allottees. It is submitted by respondent-BDA
641
that land bearing Sy.Nos.94/4B and 95/5 situated on the
northern side of Sy.No.94/7 was not included in the
Notification dated 23.02.2004.
W.P.No.29317/2015:
35. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 16 guntas of
land situated in Sy.No.4/1 of Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka
Hobli, she has sought for quashing of acquisition proceedings
commenced under impugned Notification dated 18.06.2014
and also endorsement dated 20.01.2015–Annexure-A
whereunder prayer of the petitioner for deleting land in
question from acquisition has been turned down by BDA.
35.1 It is the contention of Sri.Y.S.Vedhkumar, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioner that though petitioner’s
name was mutated in the revenue records, none of the
impugned Notifications reflected her name. He would also
submit that land in question measures about 16 guntas and is
an isolated pocket surrounded by land Sy.Nos.4/2, 5/2, 4/1
which lands have not been acquired and yet, respondent –
BDA by pick and choose method has sought to acquire land in
question belonging to the petitioner and as such, he has
sought for said land being dropped from the acquisition
642
proceedings. He would also draw the attention of court to
paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY reported in to
contend that claim of petitioner would fall within four corners
of the said directions/clarification issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court.
35.2 Perusal of working plan and plan approved by the
Commissioner, BDA, insofar as it relates to Sampigehalli
village, would disclose that land measuring 16 guntas in
Sy.No.4/1 which is sought to be acquired, is indicated as
reserved for civil amenity and said land is bounded on East by
Sy.No.4/2, South by Sy.No.5/2, West by Sy.No.4/1 and
thereafter by Sy.No.6/1 and all these three lands have not
been notified for acquisition.
W.P.No.29541/2015:
36. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus being
issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment
made.
36.1 Petitioners were applicants before respondent-BDA,
who had filed applications seeking allotment of sites formed in
Arkavati Layout. Pursuant to said application, petitioners
were allotted site No.71 in Block No.7 and Sy.No.829 in Block
643
No.11, Arkavati Layout measuring 50’ x 80’ and 30’ x 40’ vide
allotment letters dated 24.06.2006 and 30.12.2005 -
Annexures-A and B respectively. Pursuant to same, entire site
value is said to have been deposited by the petitioners. On
account of non-execution of sale deed or delivering possession,
petitioners have approached this court seeking a writ of
mandamus to direct respondent-BDA to register the sale deeds
in respect of sites allotted to them.
36.2 On respondents being notified, statement of
objections have been filed stating that under re-do exercise
carried out by BDA pursuant to decision of Hon’ble Apex Court
in BONDU RAMASWAMY, large number of sites are being held
up or lands have been deleted and as such about 3000 sites
have been reserved for being allotted to the allottees in another
Layout “Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout”. Hence,
respondent-BDA has stated that petitioners have been allotted
site Nos. B9-SC-2201 and B5-SF-2137 to petitioners as per the
allotment letters dated 09.11.2017 (Annexures-R2 and R3).
Hence, they contend that present prayer sought for in the writ
petitions has become infructuous.
644
37. Though stand of respondent-BDA appeals to logic,
fact remains that even in respect of sites which have been
allotted, there is no whisper with regard to Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement or absolute sale deed having not been executed in
favour of petitioners. As such, respondent - BDA is directed to
take immediate steps in this regard to execute Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement and petitioners shall approach BDA for redressal of
their grievance in that regard. In the event of such
application/representation is filed, BDA shall consider the
same and take steps expeditiously, at any rate, within an outer
limit of three months from the date of receipt of such
representations.
W.P.Nos.30781/2015:
38. Petitioner who is claiming to be the owner of land
bearing Sy.No.2/5 measuring 1 acre 27 guntas situated at
Thanisandra village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk is
seeking for deletion of said land from acquisition.
38.1 Working map/plan produced by the BDA would
disclose that on the north and south of land bearing
Sy.No.2/5, it is bounded by Sy.Nos.2/4 and 2/B, which have
not been notified for acquisition, on the eastern side there is a
645
road and thereafter land bearing Sy.No.11/1, which is also
notified for acquisition and on the western side, Sy.No.1/1 is
situated and same is also not notified for acquisition. Hence,
it is the contention of learned Advocate appearing for petitioner
that claim of the petitioner would fall within the parameters of
paragraph 160(ii) of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and
petitioner is entitled for deletion/dropping of his land from
acquisition.
W.P.No.35055/2015:
39. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus being
issued to BDA for executing sale deed pursuant to allotment
made.
W.P.No.47820/2015:
40. In this writ petition the dispute relates to the
property bearing Sy.No.65/5 measuring 2 acres 2 guntas out
of which 1 acre has sought to be acquired located at
Dasarahalli Village.
41. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments
advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and he would rely upon the
judgment rendered in W.P.No.47819/2015 on 19.08.2017 by
646
the Coordinate, Bench which has been annexed to file on
26.05.2018.
W.P.No.47822/2015:
42. The Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case while affirming the judgment of Division Bench had
issued further directions and clarification. Insofar as present
case is concerned, it would suffice to take note of the direction
No.(ii) issued under Paragraph 160, which reads as under:
“(ii). In regard to villages of Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where there are several very small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by lands which were not acquired or which were deleted
from the proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for forming self-contained Layouts. The acquisition thereof cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of acquired land, could be
used as a stand-alone park or playground in regard to a Layout formed in a different unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.”
43. It is a specific case of Sri. Shashikiran Shetty,
learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that
property bearing Sy.No.54/1A measuring 25 guntas owned by
petitioners was sought to be acquired to an extent of 12.5
guntas and initially under the Preliminary Notification dated
647
03.02.2003 other adjacent Survey numbers were also
proposed to be acquired and same was notified in the Final
Notification dated 23.02.2004, which was subsequently revised
pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case rendered by Hon’ble
Apex Court and as such revised Notification dated 18.06.2014
came to be issued whereunder an extent of 12.5 guntas in
Sy.No.54/1A alone was sought to be acquired or dropped from
the acquisition. Hence, contendig that perusal of directions
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court or in other words directions
issued by the Division Bench having not been followed by BDA
in its letter and spirit, he seeks for allowing writ petition.
W.P.No.47823/2015:
44. The subject matter of these two petitions are
Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4 situated at Nagawara village
measuring 9 and 10 guntas respectively. They are bounded on
east by Sy.No.103/5, west by Sy.No.102/2 north by
Sy.No.103/2 and south by Sy.No.102/5.
44.1 Insofar as Sy.No.103/5 is concerned, same has not
been notified for acquisition likewise Sy.No.103/2. However,
Sy.No.102/2 on the western side which was initially notified,
and subsequently came to be dropped from acquisition after
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Thus, in respect of this
648
composite property Sy.Nos.103/3 and 103/4, which is
surrounded by Sy.No.103/5 on the eastern side, Sy.No.102/2
on the western side, Sy.No.103/2 on the northern side and
Sy.No.102/5 on the southern side, are either not the subject
matter of acquisition or it has been deleted. Thus, prima facie
it would fall within the four corners of directions issued by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAAMASWAMY’s case at
paragraph 160(ii).
W.P.No.47827/2015:
45. Sri. Shashikiran Shetty, learned Senior Counsel
appearing for petitioner would reiterate the arguments
advanced in W.P.No.47822/2015 and submits that claims of
the petitioner would fall within the parameter laid down by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case at
paragraph 160(ii).
W.P.No.57992/2015:
46. Heard.
46.1 Petitioner has contended in the petition that he and
his brothers are owners and in possession of the land bearing
Sy.No.117/1 measuring 47 guntas, is seeking for deletion of
said land by quashing Notification dated 18.06.2014 and to re-
649
consider the representation dated 26.11.2013 (Annexure-E),
whereunder he has sought for said land being dropped from
acquisition on the ground that adjacent lands have been
deleted subsequent to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in
the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
46.2 It is the contention of Sri. Somashekar, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioner that land in question is
surrounded by Sy.Nos.115 and 116 on the western side,
Sy.No.94 on the eastern side and Sy.No.118 on the northern
side have been dropped/deleted from acquisition and as such,
acquisition of land in question would be contrary to the
directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for allowing the
petition.
46.3 Sri B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA would reiterate the contentions raised in the
statement of objections and prays for dismissal of the writ
petition.
W.P.No.751/2016:
47. Petitioner is seeking for allotment of an alternate
site contending inter alia that on more than three occasions
650
sites were allotted in favour of petitioner and yet petitioner has
not been able to see the light of day of a site having been
allotted to him.
47.1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
submit that site measuring 30’ x 40’ bearing No.184/E was
allotted on 30.12.2005 pursuant to which Lease-cum-Sale
Agreement executed on 27.06.2008 and Possession Certificate
though issued, BDA did not deliver possession of the site as
site was not available. Hence, on being called upon to execute
a Cancellation Deed, petitioner executed the same on
30.05.2005 prior to which an alternate site bearing No.632
was allotted on 29.12.2014 and Allotment Letter was also
issued on 15.07.2015. However, possession of said site was
also not delivered on the ground that it would fall within the
redo category as ordered by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, a new site bearing No.150 in
Survey No.204 was allotted at Sampigehalli Village, but
unfortunately the CD report disclosed that there was no such
site available.
47.2 Hence, petitioner being left in lurch has sought for
a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA to allot site in favour
651
of petitioner forthwith, as he had got registered himself for
allotment way back in the year 2005 and for the past 16 years
petitioner has been waiting for an allotment of a site. He
would also submit that petitioner was a Government Servant
at the time he applied for allotment and his fond hope of
having a shelter has got shattered on account of laxity
exhibited by the BDA in not allotting the site or allotting a site,
which is not in existence or allotting a site which is in dispute.
Hence, he prays for writ being issued as prayed for in the writ
petition.
47.3 Having regard to the aforesaid facts, we have
perused the case papers and same would disclose that
petitioner had sought for allotment of site from BDA in the
year 2005 under Government Servants category, with a fond
hope of constructing a house and had got himself registered
with the BDA. Petitioner was initially allotted a site in the year
2005, which site did not exist at all and as such he was forced
to execute a Cancellation Deed in respect of site allotted to him
i.e., site No.184/E, as the said site never existed or in other
words, it was not available for possession being delivered to
petitioner. Successive attempts made by the BDA to allot site
652
bearing Nos.632 and 150 did not materialize on account of
these two sites either being in the category of redo category or
CD report reflecting non-availability of the said sites.
47.4 Be that as it may. The fact remains that petitioner
has not been allotted site afresh after the execution of
cancellation deed in respect of site allotted to him. Hence,
petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought for.
W.P.2392/2016:
48. It is the contention of Sri Zulfikar Kumar Shaffi,
learned counsel appearing for petitioner, that property bearing
Survey No.24/1 measuring 22 guntas owned by the petitioner
is a landlocked property namely; on all the three sides i.e., on
the eastern side property bearing Survey No.24/2, on the
western side property bearing Survey Nos.19/1 and 19/2 and
northern side the land bearing Survey Nos.26/5a1 and 26/6 of
petitioner’s property, are all well developed land and said
survey numbers have been de-notified from acquisition. Even
on the southern side of the property belonging to the petitioner
there exists Nagawara Lake and as such proposed acquisition
in respect of petitioner’s land has to be necessarily deleted in
view of law laid down by the Apex Court in BONDU
653
RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for, acquisition insofar
as petitioner’s land is concerned, being quashed.
W.P.No.5446/2016:
49. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus being
issued to respondents to consider the claim of petitioner
contending his allotment as having been made in the year
2006, since similarly situated persons as per the list furnished
under Annexure-A, who were much below the list in the claim
for allotment of sites, had been allotted sites in the year 2006
and as such allotment made on 04.07.2013 was directed to be
considered as an allotment made in the year 2006.
Consequently, petitioner is seeking for resolution dated
23.09.2015 (Annexure-G) and endorsement dated 28.10.2015
(Annexure-H) issued to the petitioner to be quashed.
W.P.No.11295/2016:
50. Petitioner has been allotted a corner site by BDA
and as such learned counsel appearing for petitioner contends
that under the extant Rules of BDA a corner site cannot be
allotted and it is intermediary site, which can be allotted and
as such he has sought for an alternate site, being allotted to
the petitioner. Hence, he prays for a writ of mandamus being
654
issued by directing BDA to consider the representation of
petitioner for allotment of alternate
W.P.No.12010/2016:
51. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for
petitioner that petitioner has paid excess amount than what
was demanded by the BDA and as such petitioner may be
refunded the excess amount and to the said extent, she seeks
for a writ of mandamus being issued by the BDA.
W.P.No.13637/2016:
52. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has
sought for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to
consider the representation for allotment of site.
W.P.No.15833/2016:
53. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for
petitioner that petitioner has purchased a site carved out of
Sy.No.26/5 situated at K.Narayanapura Village, K.R.Puram
Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, under a registered sale deed
dated 28.04.1997 and thereafter, revenue records were
mutated in his name as per Annexure-C to C-13 and in the
year 2003 said area has fallen within the jurisdiction of BBMP
and taxes have been paid to BBMP and khatha has been made
over in the name of petitioner. It is also contended that
655
petitioner came to know about the acquisition only in the year
2015 and immediately thereafter he has filed present writ
petition challenging the present Notification.
53.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Standing
Counsel appearing for petitioner opposing the prayer sought
for in the petition he would contend that petitioner is bound by
the judgment rendered by the Division Bench whereunder the
only remedy given to the revenue site holders is to make an
application and as such petitioner cannot feign ignorance in
the light of law laid down by the Apex Court. He would submit
that claim of the petitioner is in accordance with the dicta laid
down by the Division Bench, which is since been upheld by the
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and as such
petitioner would be entitled to an alternate site. He would
submit that only in order to overcome the latches a feeble
attempt has been made by pleading as though the petitioner
came to know about the acquisition only in the year 2015 and
having not challenged the acquisition proceedings at this
length of time, petitioner would not be entitled to relief sought
for. Hence, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
656
W.P.No.33385/2016:
54. Petitioners claim to be the owners of land bearing
Sy.No.35/1 measuring 2 acres 31 guntas situated at
Thanisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
54.1 It is the contention of Sri T Seshagiri Rao, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that entire property is built
up and land situated in all the four sides of the property has
been deleted.
54.2 Per contra, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent-BDA has contended that on the eastern side and
southern side, land bearing Sy.No.170/10B and 35/2
respectively have been acquired and have not been deleted. He
would also draw the attention of Court to the mahazar drawn
as per Annexure-R1 to contend that except building described
therein, entire land was vacant as on the date of mahazar
being drawn i.e., on 25.08.2003 and any further improvements
made by the petitioners would not enure to their benefit.
Hence, he submits that claim of the petitioners would not fall
within the parameters laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
657
W.P.No.38919/2016:
55. Under the Preliminary Notification, an extent of 1
acre 11 guntas in Sy.No.11/10 of Jakkur Village (out of total
extent of 2 acres 21 guntas) has sought to be acquired under
Sl.No.28. Subsequent to Final Notification dated 23.02.2004,
an extent of 0.26 guntas was sought to be acquired under
Sl.No.18. Subsequent to the order of Division Bench and
Hon’ble Apex Court, an exercise has been undertaken by the
BDA, which resulted in Notification dated 18.06.2014 being
issued under which BDA has sought to acquire 0.14 guntas of
land as reflected at Sl.No.697 of said Notification. The
comprehensive plan which has been produced at Annexure-S
would clearly indicate that on the western portion of
Sy.No.11/10 is sought to be acquired. The lands so proposed
to be acquired is bounded on the northern side of Sy.No.10/4
and 10/3, which have not been acquired and on the southern
side of Sy.No.11/10 which is dropped from the acquisition and
on the eastern side bounded on Sy.No.13/2 has also been
deleted from the acquisition. On the western side, which is
bounded on Sy.Nos.11/1 and 11/2, have not been acquired at
all, which would clearly goes to show that it is the landlocked
658
land as indicated in paragraph 160(ii) of the BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
55.1 This factual matrix is not seriously disputed by the
learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In fact
statement of objections itself has not been filed in this petition.
Prima facie it would indicate that land in question is the
landlocked land.
W.P.No.47461/2016:
56. Petitioners are seeking for a direction to
respondents to allot sites measuring 40’ x 60’ formed in
Sy.Nos.17, 18, 19/1 & 31/1 of Venkateshpura and
Sampigehalli village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk.
56.1 It is the contention of Sri Adinarayan, learned
Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners and
similarly placed persons are members of third respondent –
society and an extent of 41 acres of land came to be in
possession of society, who developed the same into sites and
petitioner had been allotted a site and same is the subject
matter of acquisition by BDA for formation of Arkavati Layout.
By relying upon the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the
case of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, petitioners seeks for a
659
direction to respondents to consider their representations for
allotment of site.
56.2 Per contra, Sri Lakshmeesh Rao, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA submits that sites have been
formed in the area, which has been acquired after taking
possession of said land. He further submits that petitioner
does not have any right, inasmuch as, there is no registered
sale deed in his favour and as such, question of considering
the claim for allotment of site would not arise.
56.3 Perusal of records would disclose that
undisputedly, petitioners are claiming right for allotment of
site based on allotment made by third respondent – society
during the year 2001. Undisputedly, there is no registered
sale deed executed in his favour. Petitioners had not
challenged acquisition proceedings at any point of time. Thus,
grievance of the petitioners, if any, has to be addressed by
third respondent, would not arise and as such, question of
issuing any writ in the nature of mandamus to second
respondent would not arise.
660
W.P.No.54790/2016:
57. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to
direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to acquire schedule property in
accordance with law and award compensation to the
petitioner.
57.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that out of 1 acre 20
guntas in Sy.No.42/3 possession to an extent of 20 guntas of
land has been forcibly taken by BDA for formation of Layout
and initially BDA had made an attempt to dispossess the
petitioner and suit was filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim
order of temporary injunction was sought, which was denied
and on rejection of Interlocutory Application for temporary
injunction had been confirmed in MFA No.3564/2011 on
23.08.2011 with a direction to trial court to consider the claim
of plaintiff independently, which resulted in permanent
injunction being granted by virtue of judgment and decree
having been passed by the trial court, it is established that
petitioner’s land to the extent of 20 guntas has been forcibly
taken over by respondent-BDA and as such, he sought for
allowing the writ petition and granting the reliefs sought for.
661
57.2 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA would support the endorsement
dated 08.08.2016 – Annexure-N issued to petitioner
whereunder it has been stated that land belonging to the
petitioner has not been acquired.
57.3 Petitioner claims to have acquired title to the
property in question and on the premise that BDA was
attempting to interfere with the possession of land, suit came
to be filed in O.S.No.1845/2010 and interim order of
temporary injunction sought for was negatived and confirmed
in MFA No.3564/2011 by order dated 23.08.2011.
Subsequently, suit having been decreed, on the said basis
premise petitioner is seeking writ of mandamus in this writ
petition. Holistic reading of entire judgment and decree
passed by trial court would clearly indicate that plaintiff’s
possession over property in question has been reiterated by
the learned trial Judge and has held that petitioner was in
possession of the suit schedule property as on date of filing of
said suit vide paragraph 9 of the judgment. On the other
hand, consistent stand of respondent - BDA throughout is that
land in question measures 1 acre 20 guntas, out of which, 20
662
guntas is kharab land. As such, question of paying
compensation to the petitioner has been rejected by
respondent-BDA vide endorsement dated 08.08.2016 –
Annexure-N. In fact, said endorsement would disclose that
there was existing road already and if it is so, this court sitting
in writ jurisdiction would not be in a position to adjudicate the
disputed question of fact and as such, it would be open for the
petitioner to establish with regard to his title to the extent of
20 guntas and then seek for appropriate relief of payment of
compensation.
W.P.No.27750/2018:
58. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for
petitioners that petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of
sites purchased by them under the respective sale deeds and
they have not been divested of the possession of properties and
as such acquisition proceedings in respect of these sites ought
to be quashed by quashing the Preliminary and Final
Notification.
W.P.Nos.59793/2016:
59. Petitioners who are owners of property bearing
Sy.No.21/5 of Kempapura village, measuring 1 acre 2 guntas
are before this Court seeking declaration that notice dated
663
06.09.2016 – Annexure-E issued by second respondent
whereunder petitioners are called upon to execute certain
documents and undertaking for receiving the land to an extent
of 40% i.e., an extent in the ratio of 60:40 for each acre.
59.1 Petitioners purchased the land in question on
17.01.2004 from one Sri. Manjappa, who in turn had
purchased the land from Sri. Anthonappa under registered
sale deed dated 26.04.1993. Proceedings came to be initiated
against said Sri. Manjappa alleging violation of Section 79A of
the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1973 and said proceedings
having attained Finality before Karnataka Appellate Tribunal
in Appeal No.79/2002 whereunder Tribunal set aside the order
of forfeiture dated 11.07.1997 and allowed the appeal by order
dated 19.08.2002.
59.2 During this interregnum period, land in question
came to be notified by BDA for acquisition for formation of
residential Layout known as ‘Arkavati Layout’ on account of
petitioners names having not been reflected in the acquisition
proceedings and alleging violation of principles of natural
justice, petitioners were before this Court in
W.P.Nos.31467/2011 & 40778/2013 for quashing of
664
Notification dated 23.02.2004 on the ground it was illegal.
Said writ petitions came to be disposed of by Co-ordinate
Bench on 30.09.2013 vide Annexure-A by observing to the
following effect:
“12. With regard to the factual situation on that aspect, certainly this Court will not go into that aspect at this juncture in a writ petition, since the same would have to be looked into by the respondents keeping in view not only the documents under which the petitioners No.1 to 3 have purchased the property, but the fact situation existing keeping in view the nature of construction, if any that is available therein, age of construction etc., so as to find out, whether such construction in fact existed much prior to the Preliminary Notification or not. On deciding this aspect, the appropriate relief as available to the petitioners under Para 160 of the judgment in Bondu Ramaswamy’s case would be made applicable to the petitioner. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to proceed further with the acquisition proceedings as initiated, but to consider the case of the petitioners under the category where it would be admissible as stated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision referred to above.
13. In order to enable such consideration, the
petitioners shall now file all the necessary papers and copy of this order with the respondents within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent No.2 shall thereafter consider the case of the petitioners in the manner as directed herein above and thereafter come to a conclusion with regard to the nature of relief to be granted. Such relief would be available to the petitioners No.1 to 3 jointly and the petitioner No.4 shall be excluded, since the petitioners No.1 to 3 have indicated that they have purchased the property from the petitioner No.4. The consideration of the respondent No.2 shall be concluded as expeditiously as possible, but not
665
later than six weeks from the date of copy being filed with the respondents. The further action, if any to be taken in that regard shall also be concluded as expeditiously as possible.”
60. Pursuant to the same, petitioners submitted
representation on 29.10.2013 enclosing order passed in the
writ petitions as well as other documents and pursuant to the
same, impugned endorsement/intimation came to be issued to
the petitioners. Thereafter, petitioners submitted
representation dated 19.09.2016 to the BDA contending that
claim of petitioners will have to be considered in accordance
with paragraph 160 of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. On
account of non-consideration of said representation,
petitioners are before this Court.
60.1 It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for petitioners that representation of petitioners has not been
considered in terms of directions/clarification issued by
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and even
otherwise, records of BDA would itself demonstrates that land
of petitioners is in the midst of lands, which have already been
deleted and as such, question of continuing acquisition
proceedings would be diametrically opposite to the dicta laid
666
down by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
It is also contended that when the authority itself has given up
neighbouring lands, question of continuing proceedings in
respect of land belonging to petitioners would not serve any
purpose and there cannot be formation of Layout in the
isolated pieces of land. Hence, he has prayed for allowing the
petition.
60.2 Per contra, learned Advocate appearing for
respondent No.-2-BDA would support acquisition proceedings
on the ground it has already been upheld by the Apex Court.
W.P.No.64534/2016:
61. Petitioner is seeking for an alternate site and as
such has sought for writ of mandamus being issued to
respondents.
61.1 It is the grievance of petitioner that BDA had
allotted a site in favour of petitioner bearing Sy.No.1313 and
even possession certificate also came to be issued pursuant to
which khatha was mutated in the name of petitioner and taxes
were also paid. However, BDA has cancelled khatha on the
ground that said site is to be allotted to the land owners in lieu
667
of they having given up their right over the lands, which have
been acquired for the formation of Layout. Hence, she seeks
for a writ of mandamus being issued to BDA for allotment of
alternate site.
W.P.No.815/2017 c/w W.P. No.6717/2016:
62. Petitioner was allotted a site bearing No.748 in 8th
Block, Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. Pursuant to which
Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 15.11.2007 and
Possession Certificate was issued on 17.11.2007. However, on
account of said site falling under the redo category, physical
possession of the site so allotted was not delivered in favour of
the petitioner. Hence, a representation came to be submitted
by the petitioner on 06.08.2014 for allotment of alternate site.
Acceding to the request made by the petitioner, a site bearing
No.BK90 was allotted on 31.05.2016. Thereafter allotment
process insofar as said site relating to the petitioner has got
stagnated for reasons unknown. Hence, petitioner has
invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for issuance of
writ of mandamus to direct the BDA to perform its statutory
duty namely; to execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement and
deliver possession of the property to petitioner.
668
W.P.No. 21361/2017:
63. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the
respondent – BDA to execute absolute Sale Deed in respect of
site No.1170 contending that Lease-cum-Sale Agreement was
executed way back on 24.06.2006 and possession has been
delivered and Katha has also been mutated in the name of the
petitioner and for the reasons best known, BDA is not
executing Sale Deed.
63.1 Having regard to the aforestated facts petitioner
would be entitled to the relief sought for or in other words, it
has to be necessarily held that writ of mandamus is to be
issued to the respondents to execute the Sale Deed in respect
of site allotted to him. Mere pendency of proceedings would
not absolve the respondents-BDA from discharging its
statutory obligations, particularly when there being no order of
stay or injunction operating against the BDA to execute the
Sale Deed.
W.P.No.40596/2017:
64. Sy.No.4/4 which totally measures 1 acre 28 guntas
situated at Thanisandra Village has sought to be acquired to
an extent of 12 guntas, which is under challenge.
669
Sri.Nagabhushan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner by
reiterating the grounds urged in W.P.No.28861/2014 would
also rely upon the RTC Extracts (Annexure-A), which would
indicate that way back in the year 2000-01 name of the
petitioner has been entered in the revenue records or in other
words, revenue records came to be mutated in the name of
petitioner and yet BDA has not notified the name of khatedar
by including the name of petitioner, but issued Notification in
the name of a dead person. He would also submit that land
which is sought to be acquired is adjacent and abutting to land
which has not been notified and no useful or fruitful purpose
would be served in continuing the acquisition proceedings and
as such he prays for quashing of the proceedings.
W.P. No. 43194/2017:
65. Petitioner is seeking for a writ of mandamus to the
respondents to consider the representations dated 03.05.2017
Annexures – F and F1, contending interalia, that petitioner
was the allottee of site bearing No.833 Annexure – A in Survey
No.8/5 of Sampigehalli Village. Pursuant to which, Lease-
cum-Sale Agreement was executed on 28.02.2007 and
Possession Certificate was also issued. It is also stated that
Katha of the said property was mutated in the name of
670
petitioner and he has been paying taxes. But surprisingly,
BDA executed a Sale Deed in respect of same property, which
was allotted to the petitioner in favour of one Sri Narayanappa
under a registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.2013 and as such a
representation was submitted on 03.05.2017 seeking for
cancellation of said Sale Deed and execution of absolute Sale
Deed in favour of the petitioner or alternatively to allot
alternate site. Undisputedly, in the instant case subsequent
purchaser who has acquired right over the property namely,
site said to have been allotted in favour of the petitioner, has
not been made a party, who is necessary and proper party. As
such question of granting relief of either cancellation of the
Sale Deed executed by BDA in favour of said Narayanappa or
declaring that petitioner could be the absolute owner of the
said site No.833 by virtue of Lease-Cum-Sale Agreement dated
27.02.2007 on executing by BDA, does not arise.
65.1 However, petitioner having been allotted site in the
year 2007 itself, pursuant to which a Lease-cum-Sale Deed
have also been executed, Possession Certificate issued, Katha
mutated in his name, BDA will have to necessarily consider his
671
claim for allotment of alternate site by considering the
representations dated 03.05.2017.
W.P.No.49031/2017:
66. Petitioner herein came to be allotted site bearing
No.721, Block VIII of Arkavati Layout on 24.06.2006. After
having paid Rs.2,27,300/- on 24.02.2007, Lease cum Sale
Agreement came to be executed on 17.05.2007 and khatha
was made over to the name of the petitioner. On account of
said site having been allotted in favour of erstwhile owners,
petitioner was allotted alternate site bearing No.1043 in Block
VIII and allotment letter was issued on 10.04.2014. Despite
submitting representations to issue possession certificate and
Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of site No.1043, BDA has
not executed the same. Hence, petitioner is before this Court
seeking for a direction to BDA to issue possession certificate
and to execute Lease cum Sale Agreement in respect of Site
No.1043.
66.1 No statement of objections has been filed by BDA
controverting the averments made in the objections. This
would only indicate that BDA has no objection for writ of
mandamus being issued.
672
W.P.No.26667/2018:
67. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits
that as per the report of Special Land Acquisition Officer
(Annexure-K) it has been clearly stated therein that land
owned by the petitioners cannot be acquired and as such
representation has been submitted to BDA for denotifying the
same and representations of petitioners having not been
considered, they are seeking for writ of mandamus being
issued to respondents to consider their representation. His
submission is placed on record.
W.P.No.53051/2018:
68. It is the contention of Sri. Nagabhushan, learned
counsel appearing for petitioner that property of the petitioner,
which he has inherited from his grandfather measures 39 feet
from East to West and 37 feet from North to South carved out
of from Sy.No.27/4B of Kempapura Village and said land
having been notified for acquisition, was the subject matter of
acquisition even under the earlier acquisition proceedings and
subsequently, by the impugned Notification a portion of
Sy.No.27/4B viz., to an extent of 20 guntas including the land
of petitioner is sought to be acquired giving a complete goby to
the direction issued by the Division Bench as well as Apex
673
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and BDA has failed to
consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and
drawing the attention of court to paragraph 22 wherein the
adjacent survey numbers have been indicated, which are said
to have been deleted by BDA, proposed acquisition of
Sy.No.27/4B is sought to be quashed. He would also contend
that in view of adjacent land owners in respect of very same
survey numbers having been deleted, if the land of petitioner is
sought to be acquired without considering prayer for deletion,
it amounts to considering equals by unequals thereby hit by
Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Hence, he prays for
allowing the writ petition.
W.P.Nos.15096/2019: 69. It is the contention of learned Advocate appearing
for petitioners that land bearing Sy.No.4/4 of Horamavu
village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, which is
sought to be acquired under the Notification dated 18.06.2014
is to be deleted and by relying upon directions issued in
W.A.No.2624/2005, petitioners claim that they are entitled for
alternate sites in the event of prayer for deletion of sites in
question is not acceded to.
674
69.1 Per contra, learned Advocates appearing for
respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings
and contend that petitioners are subsequent purchasers and
as such, they would not get any right and they pray for
dismissal of writ petitions.
69.2 Perusal of the records in W.P.No.15096/2019
would disclose that mother of petitioner acquired title to the
property bearing Sy.No.4/4 under registered sale deed dated
22.06.1995 and subsequently, gift deed has been executed in
favour of petitioner in the year 2008 by which time,
Preliminary Notification and Final Notification had been
issued.
69.3 Working plan of Sy.No.4/4 of Byrathikhane earlier
known as Horamavu Agara village has been perused, which
would indicate that on the northern side of Sy.No.4/4,
Sy.No.4/6 is existing which has already been acquired. On the
Western side, Sy.No.3/1 is located which has been acquired
and on the eastern side, Sy.No.15/1 has also been acquired
and so also on the southern side. Petitioner has undisputedly
claimed title to the property based on the gift deed executed in
the year 2008, which is subsequent to the Notification dated
675
03.02.2003 and has not submitted any representation to the
BDA, pursuant to order passed by Division Bench in
W.A.No.2624/2005.
W.P.No.27833/2014:
70. Petitioner is seeking for quashing of the acquisition
of lands as notified under the impugned Notification insofar as
it relates to 1 acre 12 guntas in Sy.No.30 of Sampigehalli
village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore
contending interalia that said land was sold to the petitioner
after notifying the said land to be available for public auction
vide notice dated 11.04.2007 – Annexure-B, pursuant to which
petitioner participated and was a successful bidder and has
deposited the entire amount. It is also contended that auction
sale has been approved by the appropriate Government on
11.05.2007 – Annexure-D and possession of the land was
delivered on 18.10.2008. Thereafter, petitioner had sought
permission of the appropriate Government to put up a
compound wall and Deputy Commissioner by communication
dated 31.10.2008 – Annexure-AC, permitted the petitioner to
put up compound wall. It is also stated that certificate of sale
also came to be issued by the Deputy Commissioner on
01.07.2013 – Annexure-AF. It is also contended that at this
676
point of time, if the proceedings for acquiring said land
initiated at the behest of the BDA if allowed to continue, it
would not only cause financial hardship to the petitioner but
he would be put to irretrievable loss. Hence, on this ground,
petitioner seeks for deletion of land in question from being
acquired.
71. Per contra, Sri.K.Krishna, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA by reiterating the grounds
urged in the statement of objections would contend that
pursuant to Preliminary Notification dated 03.02.2003 and
Final Notification dated 23.02.2004, award came to be passed
on 25.11.2004 to an extent of 7 acres. He would also contend
that on account of dispute pending with regard to an extent of
7 acres and there being order of status-quo granted on
15.07.2014, no further development has taken place to the
extent of 7 acres and land in question having been classified
as gomal land and same being vacant and not falling under
any of the categories as indicated by the Division Bench of this
Court and clarified by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY 's case, he prays for dismissal of the petition.
677
W.P.Nos.47606/2014:
72. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue
site under a registered sale deed dated 04.12.2013 for valuable
consideration is seeking for declaring the land in question
which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the
implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to
Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6, is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the
respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging
to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to
declare that depicting of land belonging to petitioner in the
development plan and map for implementing the scheme for
formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable against petitioner.
72.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired
and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent
domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of
Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the
acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing
the prayer sought for in the writ petition.
678
72.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that
there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on
the other hand, it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures
9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab
land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 04.12.2013
is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary
Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over
the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that
petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the
predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over
suit property and alleged grant is not produced.
72.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for
respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting
subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as
‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be
acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary
Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an
entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be
acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas, even the boundaries on East,
West, North and South has been reflected improperly.
Whereas in respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries
as well as extent, which has been reflected, is same as that
679
being reflected in the original gazette Notification. This itself
speak the conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court
from perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove,
petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has
purchased the property in question on 04.12.2013 i.e., after 10
years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on
03.02.2003. Hence, petitioners are not entitled to the relief
sought for.
W.P.Nos.47607/2014:
73. Petitioner claiming to have purchased a revenue
site under a registered sale deed dated 18.03.2013 for valuable
consideration has sought for declaring the land in question
which has been Reserved for Future Development (RFD) for the
implementation of scheme for Arkavati Layout relating to
Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable; for a writ of mandamus to direct the
respondents to delete the land bearing Sy.No.45/5 belonging
to petitioner for the scheme of formation of Layout; and, to
declare that depicting of the land belonging to petitioner in the
development plan and map for implementing the scheme for
formation of Arkavati Layout is without jurisdiction and
unenforceable against petitioner.
680
73.1 It is contended that Sy.No.45/5 was never acquired
and as such question of invoking the doctrine of eminent
domain insofar as site belonging to petitioner carved out of
Sy.No.45/5 does not arise and it would fall outside the
acquisition proceedings. Hence, petitioner seeks for allowing
the prayer sought for in the writ petition.
73.2 Respondent/BDA has specifically contended that
there is no Sy.Nos.45/5 and 45/6 in Dasarahalli Village but on
the other hand it is only the Sy.No.45, which totally measures
9 acres 3 guntas and it is mufut kaval, Government kharab
land and alleged purchase of land by petitioner on 18.03.2013
is after 10 years of the date of issuance of Preliminary
Notification and as such petitioner do not get any right over
the property and sale itself is void. He would also contend that
petitioner has nowhere contended that as to how the
predecessor in title of the petitioner acquired the right over
suit property and alleged grant is not produced.
73.3 Sri.K.Krishna, learned counsel appearing for
respondent/BDA has made available the copy of map depicting
subject property i.e., Sy.No.45 wherein it has been reflected as
‘mufut kaval kharab’ of 9 acre 3 guntas is sought to be
acquired. Whereas in the photocopy of the Preliminary
681
Notification dated 23.02.2004 produced at Annexure-C an
entry has been reflected as ‘45/P’ and what is sought to be
acquired is 1 acre 3 guntas even the boundaries on East, West,
North and South has been reflected improperly. Whereas in
respect of serial number 43 and 45 the boundaries as well as
extent which has been reflected is same as that being reflected
in the original gazette Notification. This itself speak the
conduct of BDA in attempting to dodge the court from
perusing the records. As already noticed hereinabove
petitioner, who claims to be a revenue site owner, has
purchased the property in question on 18.03.2013 i.e., after 10
years of the issuance of Preliminary Notification on
03.02.2003.
W.P.NO.1876/2016:
74. Petitioner claims to be the revenue site holder
having purchased the site carved out of Sy.No.33/1,
Dasarahalli village under a registered sale deed dated
21.10.1994. It is contended that despite submission of
representation dated 09.06.2012 to delete the site purchased
by petitioner, BDA has not favourably considered the same
and as such, she has sought for not only deleting the said site
from acquisition but has also sought for a direction to the
682
second respondent to consider her representation dated
09.06.2012 – Annexure-E.
74.1 The Division Bench while disposing of the matter,
insofar as revenue site holders are concerned, has extended an
olive branch by directing such of the revenue site holders to
register themselves as applicants for allotment under
Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules,
1984 within a period of two months from the date of order i.e.,
25.11.2005 and extendable for additional period of one month,
if sufficient cause is shown. However, records do not disclose
that petitioner has got registered with BDA.
74.2 Be that as it may. Even assuming for a moment
that pendency of cases before courts precluded the petitioner
from getting herself registered as directed by Division Bench is
a good ground to call upon the BDA to consider representation
of the petitioner, by itself would not suffice for the simple
reason that writ of mandamus can be issued only when there
is a statutory right vested in the applicant, demand made and
non-consideration of such demand by the authority. In this
regard, representation stated to have been submitted by the
petitioner which is at Annexure-E dated 09.06.2012 cannot be
construed as a valid representation, inasmuch as, it does not
683
bear acknowledgement for having submitted the said
representation to BDA or office copy would contain seal of BDA
and writ of mandamus to consider such representation cannot
be issued. However, in the interest of justice and in the light
of judgment rendered by the Division Bench directing the BDA
to consider the representations/applications submitted even
beyond the time prescribed, similar directions requires to be
issued to BDA, to consider the representations/applications
submitted by applicants-revenue site holders by keeping in
mind the observations made by the Division Bench and
Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, similar
relief deserves to be granted to petitioner also.
W.P.Nos.19783/2018:
75. Petitioner claims to be the owner of 2 sites (totalling
to an extent of 2 Acres 9 guntas) in Sy.No.46/2 situated at
Amruthahalli village and out of which 2 acres have been
notified for acquisition, contends that he has purchased 2 sites
bearing Nos.3 and 4 each measuring 40 X 72 ft. and that said
acquisition is liable to be interfered on the ground that
adjacent lands are fully built up as evident from the sketch
/plan- Annexure-A and it would meet the
clarifications/directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
684
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. He would also submit that
petitioner has constructed fairly a big residential houses and
for want of finance he could not construct regular house. He
would also submit that composite property of 2 acres is
notified and all the 3 sites are residential apartment buildings
and as such forming sites in isolated pocket i.e., in 2 acres
would be contrary to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in
the BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. Hence, he prays for
allowing the petition.
75.1 Per contra, Sri. Krishna, learned counsel appearing
for respondent-BDA would support the acquisition proceedings
and he would contend that possession of 2 acres is taken and
sites are formed by BDA and 13 sites have already been
allotted to the applicants who had sought for sites. Hence, he
prays for dismissal of petition.
75.2 It has to be seen from the directions issued by
Division Bench and also clarifications/directions issued by the
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, that land holders
whose lands have been locked are sought to be acquired and
residential sites are to be constructed in small pockets, same
could not serve the purpose for which land is sought to be
acquired. If the lands are not in isolated pocket or it would
685
form major chunk, proposed acquisition would suffice for BDA
for formation of sites and it is not open for the petitioner to
contend that even in such circumstances also, lands proposed
for acquisition are to be deleted.
W.P.No.2462/2015:
76. As already observed hereinabove, under the guise
of implementing orders of Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, which was in furtherance of orders
passed by Division Bench whereunder several guidelines came
to be issued to BDA to ensure that where the lands sought to
be acquired is a landlocked area or in other words, island and
as such continuation of the acquisition proceedings would not
be favourable in the interest of both parties. Apex Court had
also directed BDA to drop such pocket of lands from being
acquired. Taking umbrage under this order, officials of BDA
seems to have gone on the spree of de-notifying the lands by
pick and choose methods. In other words, there being no
transparency and obviously to favour such of those persons
whom they thought is to be favoured, the glaring example for
such incidents can be noticed in respect of lands bearing
Sy.No.89/1 situated at Nagavara village, Map of which lands
686
has been produced by learned panel counsel appearing for
BDA, boundaries as described in the said Map reads as under:
East by: Sy.No.87 not acquired
West by: Sy.No.90 which is not included in the
Final Notification
North by: Sy.No.102/5 notified for acquisition
South by: Sy.No.89/2 notified for acquisition and later
on not included in the revised Final
Notification.
76.1 Sri. B.S. Sachin, learned panel counsel appearing
for BDA would fairly submit that there is mis-description of
the property in the sketch, particularly on the boundary of
eastern side of Sy.No.89/1. As could be seen from the map,
eastern side boundary i.e.,Sy.No.89/1 is recorded as Sy.No.90,
though it is Sy.No.102/5 and Sy.No.87. In fact, eastern
boundary is 89/2 as well as 89/5 and 89/5 is not abutting
Sy.No.89/1.
76.2 Even according to BDA, Sy.No.89/1 of the
Nagavara village measures 13 guntas and out of which, 2
guntas is Kharab land and remaining 11 guntas is said to have
been included under the acquisition namely, under the revised
Notification dated 18.06.2014 at Sl.No.1178. However, in
compilation of documents furnished to the court at part 1-B
687
relating to Nagavara village, which is at page Nos. 439 to 443,
Sy.Nos.89/1, 89/5, 89/9 have been left out. In the map which
has been made available to the court insofar as Nagavara
village is concerned, Sy.No.90 has not been included in the
Notification at all. Though, nothing is placed on record,
learned counsel appearing for the BDA submits that it is a
Layout which is approved by the BDA.
Be that as it may. Pleadings are lacking in this regard.
Even in respect of Sy.No.87, which is reflected as southern
boundary and Sy.No.89/1, which has not been notified for
acquisition. Likewise, Sy.No.89/2 which is not only abutting
and adjacent to Sy.No.89/1, southern side of Sy.No.89/1 has
not been included in the Notification. Sy.No.89/5 which is a
pocket of 7 guntas of land is sought to be acquired and despite
bringing to the notice of BDA by the owner of land bearing
Sy.No.89/5 indicating that Sy.No.89/2 has not been acquired
and Sy.No.89/6 is also left out, reason for including only 89/5
that too measuring 7 guntas of land which is island, no
reasons are forthcoming. As such this court has been
perforced to observe hereinabove that strategy has been
adopted by BDA by use of pick and choose method to de-notify
688
the land subsequent to orders of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case
passed by Hon’ble Apex Court. It requires serious examination
and officials who have indulged in such acts cannot go un-
punished. However, truth has to be ascertained in that regard
and it is left to the authorities to consider these aspects for
taking action against erring officials.
W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016, 10923/2015, 58734/2016, 15588/2017, 14868/2017, 30485/2017 & 59317/2016:
77. It is the contention of Sri.C.M.Nagabhushan,
learned Advocate appearing for petitioners that petitioners are
allottees of the sites much prior to acquisition proceedings
being set aside by learned Single Judge and on account of
order passed by the learned Single Judge having been set
aside by Division Bench on 25.11.2005 in W.A.No.2624/2005
and connected matters, BDA has undertaken the exercise as
per the directions issued by Division Bench and in the process,
has denotified several lands on the premise that they would
fall within the parameters indicated in the operative portion of
the order passed by the Division Bench and as such, site
owners/land owners were entitled to the relief sought for and
exercise undertaken by BDA is erroneous and contrary to the
facts. Assailing the same, petitioners are before this court for
689
a direction to BDA to consider their representations and also
to quash the Notification dated 18.06.2014.
77.1 Per contra, Sriyuths B.S.Sachin, K.Krishna and
Goutham Dev C Ullal, learned Advocates appearing for
respondent-BDA reiterated the contentions urged, pleas
advanced and facts pleaded in the statement of objections.
This Court Has already noticed the gist of arguments of
petitioners' counsel and reply arguments of respondents
counsel hereinabove.
77.2 Having regard to the rival contentions and on
perusal of records, it would clearly disclose that there is no
dispute to the fact that acquisition of lands, which is the
subject matter of these writ petitions was for the purpose of
formation of Arkavati Layout.
77.3 The Division Bench has upheld the acquisition of
lands for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout. It
came to be held:
“106. The acquisition of the lands for formation of Arkavati Layout is upheld subject to the following conditions:
106(C)(a) In so far as the site owners are concerned, they are entitled to the following reliefs:
(i) These site owners/writ petitioners shall register themselves as
690
applicants for allotment under the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 within a period of two months from today (extendable by another one month by BDA, if sufficient cause is shown). Petitioners will have to pay only the registration fee. They need not pay initial deposit as their sites have been acquired and they have agreed not to receive compensation in regard to the sites under this arrangement.
(ii) The petitioners shall file applications for allotment of sites to BDA within three months from today in the prescribed form stating that they are applicants who were the petitioners in these writ petitions. Petitioners shall file their documents with BDA within a period of two months to enable BDA to verify the same.
(iii) BDA will treat them as applicants entitled to priority in allotment and allot each of them a site measuring 30’ x 40’ in Arkavati Layout or in any other nearby Layouts in Bangalore at the prevailing allotment prices subject to petitioners satisfying that twin requirements for allotment under the BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984, that they must be the residents of Bangalore (10 year domicile) and should not be owning any residential property in Bangalore.
(iv) If there are no rival claimants for compensation in regard to the plots claimed by petitioners, and if the ownership of the petitioners in regard to their respective sites which have been acquired is not disputed, BDA
shall calculate the compensation payable to the petitioners and give credit to the same by adjusting the same towards the allotment price for the site to be allotted and call upon
691
the petitioners to pay the balance. Petitioners shall be given six months time for making payment. (To enable petitioners to know the amount of compensation which they will be entitled and to ascertain how much balance they should pay).
(v) If there are rival claimants in regard to the survey numbers or the sites or if any petitioners title in regard to the sites are challenged, BDA shall make a reference in regard to the compensation in regard to such site/land in question, to the Civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the petitioners will have to sort out the matter before the Reference Court. In that event, such petitioners will have to pay the full allotment price within the time stipulated, without seeking adjustment of compensation for the acquired site.
(vi) If any of the petitioners does not fulfill the requirements for allotment, under the Allotment Rules, their cases may be considered for allotment of 20' x 30' sites as per the Rules containing incentive scheme for voluntary surrender of lands. For the purpose of the said scheme, such petitioners will be deemed to have voluntarily surrendered the sites;
(vii) The above scheme will be available to only those who are owners, as a consequence of execution of registered sale deeds in their favour prior to the date of Preliminary Notification (and not to GPA/Agreement Holders).
(D) Insofar as the landowners excluding the site owners, are entitled to the following reliefs.-- (i) All the petitioners who are the
landowners who are seeking dropping of
692
the acquisition proceedings insofar as their respective lands are concerned, on the ground that: (a) their lands are situated within green belt area; (b) they are totally built up; (c) properties wherein there are buildings constructed by charitable, educational and/or religious institutions; (d) nursery lands; (e) who have set-up factories; (f) their lands are similar to the lands which are adjoining their lands but not notified for acquisition at all, are permitted to make appropriate application to the authorities seeking such exclusion and exemption and producing documents to substantiate their contentions within one month from the date of this order. It is made clear that the BDA shall consider such request keeping in mind the status of the land as on the date of Preliminary Notification and to exclude any developments, improvements, constructions put up subsequent to the Preliminary Notification and then decide whether their cases are similar to that of the landowners whose lands, are notified for acquisition, notified and whose objections were upheld and no Final Notification is issued. In the event the BDA comes to the conclusion that the lands of those persons are similarly placed, then to exclude those lands from acquisition.
(ii) Petitioners who are interested in availing
this benefit shall make appropriate application within 30 days from the date of this order and thereafter the BDA shall give notice to those persons, hear
them and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.
(iii)Till the aforesaid exercise is undertaken
by the BDA and the applications filed by
693
the petitioners either for allotment of site or for denotifying or exemption sought for are considered their possession shall not be disturbed and the existing construction shall not be demolished. After consideration of the applications, in the light of the aforesaid directions, if the lands are not excluded then the BDA is at liberty to proceed with the acquisition.
(E) The BDA is directed to exclude the land bearing Sy. No. 9/1 measuring 0.27, 10/2 measuring 1.16 and 10/3 measuring 1.02 of land which are the subject-matter of W.P. Nos. 1353-1354/2005 filed by University of Agricultural Science Employees House Building Co-operative Society from acquisition. (F) W.P.No.28087 of 2004 is allowed and acquisition of land in respect of 53 acres of land in Nagavara Village which is the subject matter of the aforesaid Writ Petition is quashed.
(2) W.A.No.2757/2005 is partly allowed. In W.P.No.25807/2004 filed by Tata Housing Development Company in respect of land bearing Sy.Nos.17/1, 18, 19, 20, 26 and 94 situated at Hennur Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore, in all measuring about 26 acres 12 guntas, the finding of the learned single Judge is set aside. Liberty is granted to the petitioners therein to make appropriate application before the BDA for deleting the said land from acquisition in view of the policy decision of the Government dated 1.6.1995. On such representation the BDA shall consider the request and pass appropriate orders. In the event their contention is upheld the said extent of land shall stand excluded from acquisition. Otherwise acquisition in respect of the said lands stand and the BDA is at liberty to form the layout.”
(Emphasis supplied by this Court)
694
78. The aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench
came to be affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of
BONDU RAMASWAMY's case, with certain modifications and
clarifications as indicated thereunder:
“160. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the directions of the Division Bench subject to the following further directions and clarifications: (i) In regard to the acquisition of lands in
Kempapura and Srirampura, BDA is directed to reconsider the objections to the acquisitions having regard to the fact that large areas were not initially notified for acquisition, and more than 50% of whatever that was proposed for acquisition was also subsequently deleted from acquisition. BDA has to consider whether in view of deletions to a large extent, whether development with respect to the balance of the acquired lands has become illogical and impractical, and if so, whether the balance area also should be deleted from acquisition. If BDA proposes to continue the acquisition, it shall file a report within four months before the High Court so that consequential orders could be passed.
(ii) In regard to villages of Venkateshapura, Nagavara, Hennur and Challakere where there are several very small pockets of acquired lands surrounded by lands which were not acquired or which were deleted from the proposed acquisition, BDA may consider whether such small pockets should also be deleted if they are not suitable for forming self-contained Layouts. The acquisition thereof cannot be justified on the ground that these small islands of acquired land, could be used as a stand-alone park or playground in regard to a Layout formed in different
695
unconnected lands in other villages. Similar isolated pockets in other villages should also be dealt with in a similar manner.
(iii) BDA shall give an option to each writ
petitioner whose land has been acquired for Arkavati Layout:
(a) to accept allotment of 15% (fifteen
percent) of the land acquired from him, by way of developed plots, in lieu of compensation (any fractions in excess of 15% may be charged prevailing rates of allotment).
OR (b) in cases where the extent of land
acquired exceeds half an acre, to claim in addition to compensation (without prejudice to seek reference if he is not satisfied with the quantum), allotment of a plot measuring 30' x 40' for every half acre of land acquired at the prevailing allotment price.
(iv) Any allotment made by BDA, either by
forming Layouts or by way of bulk allotments, will be subject to the above.”
(Emphasis supplied by this Court)
78.1 Thus, it can be noticed from the order of Division
Bench that an olive branch was extended to the bonafide
purchasers of sites from BDA, from House Building
Cooperative Societies, as well as owners of those lands which
was acquired for the purposes of formation of Arkavati Layout.
It came to be held that in the event of parameters laid
thereunder were to be satisfied by the respective site
696
owner/land owners, as the case may be, such of those persons
would be entitled to the relief sought for. In fact, the Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case supra having
upheld the decision of Division Bench issued certain directions
to the BDA in the concluding paragraph-160, which is already
noticed hereinabove to salvage the acquisition and to avoid
hardships to BDA and its allottees and to avoid prolonged
further rounds of litigation emanating from the directions of
the High Court, in order to uphold the decision of the Division
Bench, but subject to BDAs actions to certain corrective
measures by requiring it to reexamine take certain aspects and
provide an option to the land losers to secure some additional
benefit, as an incentive to accept the acquisition.
78.2 Thus, acquisition of the land for Arkavati Layout
having been upheld by the Division Bench of this court and
affirmed by the Apex Court, question of re-examining the said
issue in these writ petitions would not arise. However, it
requires to be noticed that a valiant attempt has been made by
the writ petitioners to contend that on account of
representations submitted by the petitioners/land losers under
Section 17(5) of BDA Act, Notification issued under Section
697
19(1) of BDA Act is bad in law. It requires to be noticed at this
juncture itself that said Notification was issued pursuant to
order of the Division Bench as affirmed in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case resulting in re-modified scheme of
Arkavati Layout being sanctioned. The representations
submitted by the land losers having been considered by the
BDA, ipso facto does not wipe out the impugned Notification.
It also requires to be noticed that representations of the land
losers was considered, as directed by the Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case.
78.3 Yet another contention which has been raised is
that BDA Act does not provide for second Notification. In fact,
Notification dated 18.06.2014 is not a SFN and it is a
misnomer. It could be seen from the records that enquiry
came to be conducted by the BDA pursuant to directions
issued by the Division Bench as well as by the Apex Court and
report was submitted to the Government, which resulted in
983.36 of lands being deleted and an extent of 1766 acres was
retained. In fact, the scheme which was sanctioned earlier,
stood modified by the Government. The expression and words
found in the impugned Notification 18.06.2014 is a complete
698
answer to the contentions raised by the petitioners and same
reads:
“Whereas the Government of Karnataka has approved a Re-modified Scheme for the formation of Arkavati Layout vide Government Order No. UDD/426/MNJ/2011, Bangalore, dated: 03.04.2014 in modification of the Scheme sanctioned vide Government Order No. UDD 193 MNX 2004, Bangalore, dated 21.02.2014.”
78.4 Hence, contention raised that Notification dated
18.06.2014 is bad in law on account of BDA Act not providing
for the same, is rejected. It would not be out of context to
state that Notification in question is a replacement of earlier
Notification based on the re-modified scheme. Particularly
when acquisition having been upheld subject to the
modifications, clarifications and directions issued, resulting in
appropriate Government issuing a modified Notification, would
not wipe out the acquisition proceedings itself. The impugned
Notification only replaces the earlier Notification. A reference
has been made to Section 3 and 7 of the Land Acquisition Act,
1894, in the impugned Notification and as such impugned
Notification is liable to be set aside, since it is under a repealed
New Act, is an argument which requires to be brushed aside
699
for two (2) reasons; firstly, impugned Notification is only
replacement of the earlier Notification, which was on account
of directions issued by the Apex Court; secondly, under
Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, Act prior to 2013 is
indeed saved. In fact, power to amend is always available to
the Government, inasmuch as, power to issue would include
power to amend, vary or rescind the Notifications and orders in
terms of Section 21 of General Clauses Act. In the matter of
M.P.GANGADHARAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF
KERALA AND OTHERS reported in (2006) 6 SCC 162 the
Hon’ble Apex Court has held:
"14. In terms of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, (corresponding to the relevant provisions in the Interpretation and General Clauses Act, 1925) the power to issue would include the power to amend, vary or rescind, Notifications and orders. If a Notification could be issued establishing a Family Court at Manjeri, we do not see any reason why another Notification cannot be issued by the State to shift the said court to another place but within the same area of the Family Court. In terms of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, the State Government will indisputably have jurisdiction to abolish a Family Court and establish one at another place. If such an extensive jurisdiction can be exercised by the State, we fail to comprehend as to why its jurisdiction should be held to be
limited in the matter of shifting of court from one place to another but within the same area, particularly, in view of the fact that in terms of
700
sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Act even a change in the area is permissible."
79. Successive Final Notifications for acquisition of
land on behalf of BDA is permissible and this Court in
W.P.No.16590/2004 disposed on 19.11.2013 has held that
BDA is empowered to issue SFN. It has been further held:
“8. In so far as WP 27731/2012 is concerned, it is contended that the Scheme has been substantially implemented and hence the petitioners are estopped from questioning the same.
In the light of the above contentions, the points
that would arise for consideration are as follows :
i.) Has the Scheme, pursuant to which the acquisition proceedings had been initiated, lapsed by virtue of non- implementation of the same vis-à-vis the lands of the petitioners herein.
ii.) Whether the State government is enabled to issue successive Notifications under Section 19 of the BDA Act.
It is to be noticed that a common ground raised
in all the petitions is that the Scheme sanctioned and approved by the State government under Section 18(3) of the BDA Act has not been implemented even after long lapse of time and much beyond the period, within which it ought to have been implemented, as contemplated under Section 27 of the said Act. It is also the common ground that the possession of the respective extents of land has remained with the
petitioners. Though that fact is sought to be disputed by the BDA, it is not the case of the BDA that it has developed any layout over any of the said lands. In WP 27731/2012, the BDA has not even claimed to have taken possession of the land in question.
701
The following observations of a learned single judge in the case of R. Adikesavulu Naidu v. the State of Karnataka , ILR 2011 Kar 3657, are relevant :
"90. Insofar as the acquisition proceedings
are concerned, even on admitted facts and by the operation of Section 27 of the BDA Act, if the scheme has lapsed even before the stage of the lands notified for acquisition vesting in the State and taking possession of the subject land after passing of the Award had not been reached, it is obvious that the acquisition proceedings get aborted due to the scheme lapsing and if the subject land notified for acquisition had not vested in the State within a period of five years from the date of issue of the Final Notification a period within which the scheme is required to be implemented substantially to avoid the scheme lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the BDA Act, in law even assuming for argument sake, award is passed, possession is taken after expiry of this period as a matter of fact under the enabling provisions of Section 11 of the LA Act to pass an award and the further enabling provision of section 16 of the LA Act for taking possession of the subject land also, but these statutory provisions being not available to the state and the BDA any more due to Section 27 of the Act whereafter alone the land vests absolutely in the Government in the wake of Section 36 of the BDA Act and if there is no way in law to take the acquisition proceedings also to its logical conclusion as the original purpose of acquisition itself is lost, it is obvious this is a situation attracting legal consequence of not only the scheme lapsing but also the acquisition proceedings lapsing.
91. It is necessary to bear in mind the distinction between the acquisition proceedings being quashed at any stage of the acquisition proceeding due to non-adherence of the statutory provisions and the
702
procedure and a situation of the acquisition proceedings per se lapsing due to the scheme lapsing in terms of Section 27 of the BDA Act and by that time if the acquisition proceedings having not been completed and therefore the acquisition proceedings being left midway without completion and when the matter is before the Court for examination at the instance of persons claiming interest in the subject lands, by a sense of fairness, by a duty to act in a constitutional manner, a duty to ensure that the State and public bodies which is the 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India abide by the constitutional provisions and statutory provisions and do not give scope for discriminatory act in respect of some persons who are situated in a like position as others, this Court is compelled to exercise its constitutional writ jurisdiction for quashing the proceedings and the orders of the State and the authorities akin to the State which are left incomplete, and which do not serve any purpose any more leave alone serving a public purpose and therefore writ of certiorari should be issued to put an end to this 'trishanku' stage of acquisition proceedings by quashing the incomplete acquisition proceedings."
As regards the contention that there could not be successive Final Notifications under Section 19 of the BDA Act is concerned, a learned single judge of this court has considered the question in a particular context and has held in the affirmative, in the case of B. K. Nanjudaiah v. BDA , ILR 1987 Kar 2977. The petitioners in that case claimed to be the owners of land in Survey No.16 of Malagalu village, Bangalore North Taluk, measuring about 5 acres 20 guntas. The land stood in the name of the father of the first
petitioner therein, on the death of the father of the petitioner, there was a dispute between the petitioners in respect of the land, which was the subject matter of a civil suit in OS 222/1980, before the Court of the Civil Judge, Bangalore. The same
703
stood settled under a compromise decree. Petitioner no.1 was conferred 2 acres 30 guntas and Petitioners 2 and 3 together took 2 acres 30 guntas , in terms of the compromise. The said land along with several other lands were notified for acquisition under the BDA Act, for the formation of the Nagarabhavi II Stage layout. A Preliminary Notification was published in the gazette dated 26-8-1982. A Final Notification was issued on 5-8-1986. The same was challenged. One of the grounds of challenge was that, since the State government had published a Final Notification in respect of Nagarbhavi I Stage layout, as on 16-8-1985 - pursuant to the Preliminary Notification dated 26-8-1982,the State government had no competence to issue a second Final Notification on the basis of the same Preliminary Notification. In that, it was contended that since the petitioners' lands did not find mention in the first Final Notification dated 16-9-1985, the State government must be deemed to have abandoned the scheme. State of MP v. Vishnu Prasad, AIR 1966 SC 1593, was cited in support of the argument. The apex court had held thus in Vishnu Prasad:
"There is nothing in Ss, 4, 5-A and 6 to suggest that S.4(1) is a kind of reservoir from which the government may from time to time draw out land and make declarations with respect to it successively. If that was the intention behind sections 4, 5-A and 6 we would have found some indication of it in the language used therein. But as we read these three sections together we can only find that the scheme is that S.4 specifies the locality, then there may be survey and drawing of maps of the land and the consideration whether the land is adapted for the purpose for which it has to be acquired, followed by objections and making up of its mind by the government what particular land out of that locality it needs. This
is followed by a declaration under S.6 specifying the particular land needed and that in our opinion completes the process and the Notification under S.4(1) cannot be further used thereafter. At the stage of S.4 the land is
704
not particularised but only the locality is mentioned; at the stage of S.6 the land in the locality is particularised and thereafter it seems to us that the Notification under S.4(1) having served its purpose exhausts itself. The sequence of events from a Notification of the intention to acquire [S.4(1)] to the declaration under S.6 unmistakably leads one to the reasonable conclusion that when once a declaration under Section 6 particularising the area out of the area in the locality specified in the Notification under Section 4(1) is issued, the remaining non-particularized area stands automatically released." Negating the argument, the learned judge, while
interpreting the scope of Section 19 - laid down as follows :
"13. xxx xxxx Section 19, on which the arguments is constructed, reads thus:
"19. Upon sanction, declaration to be published giving particulars of land to be acquired- (1) Upon sanction of the scheme, the Government shall publish in the official Gazette declaration stating the fact of such sanction and that the land proposed to be acquired by the Authority for the purposes of the scheme is required for a public purpose."
14. It is seen from sub-section (1) of this Section that the declaration to be published in the official Gazette has to mention the land proposed to be acquired by the authority for the purpose of the scheme and such declaration shall state the limits, for which is needed and its approximate area and the place where a plan of the land may be inspected. There is nothing in the Act from which it can be culled out that acquisition of part of the area comprised in the scheme would render the entire scheme to lapse
though the remaining area which is already contemplated in this scheme under the Act is not acquired at that stage, the scheme lapses if there is no substantial compliance with the scheme within five years as contemplated
705
by Section 27. No other provision in the Act mentions about the lapsing of the scheme. Therefore it is difficult to appreciate that by acquiring some portions of the lands in the scheme, the entire scheme lapses. It has to be remembered that the B.D.A. is required to under take development work from time to time since it has to incur expenditure and has to execute the developmental schemes. This takes me to the definition of the words 'development and engineering operations' provided in clause (2)(j) and (k), which reads thus:
"(j) 'development' with its grammatical
variations means the carrying out of building, engineering, or other operations in or over or under land or the making of any material change in any building or land and includes redevelopment;
(k) 'engineering operations' means formation or laying out of means of access to road".
The above scheme is framed for achieving
the objects for which the authority is constituted as per Section 14 of the Act. This object, obviously cannot be achieved at one stretch and requires to be achieved by stages.”
15. In the instant case, by declaration dated
16.8.1985 and 7.9.1985, an extent of 357 acres and 2 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and 163 acres 14 guntas in Malagalu village was sought to be acquired for Nagarbhavi I stage and by Notification dated 5.8.1986, an extent of 292 acres 5 guntas in Nagarbhavi village and 312 acres 5 guntas in Malagalu was sought to be acquired. This has to be resorted to because without completing the I stage, the authorities could not have undertaken the development work as defined, for the II stage."
The question again arose for consideration in
relation to acquisition proceedings under the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (Hereinafter referred to as the
706
'KIAD Act', for brevity), namely, whether successive Final Notifications under Section 28(4) of the KIAD Act, could be issued. A division bench of this court dealing with the issue in WA 3189-3201/2010 and connected cases, dated 20-11-2012, has held that with the amendment to Section 5-A and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the basis of the judgment in Vishnu Prasad Sharma's case was taken away. And that as the law stands to-day, it was permissible to make successive Notifications under Section 6(1) of the LA Act. By the issuance of a Notification under the said provision, in respect of only a portion of the land which is the subject matter of Section 4(1), the said Preliminary Notification would not lapse in respect of other provisions of the land in respect of which 6 (1) Notification is not issued.
While addressing the argument that as there
were no corresponding amendments to the KIAD Act, as brought about under the LA Act and therefore the dictum in Vishnu Prasad Sharma yet being drawn into service, the division bench on an elaborate analysis of the relevant provisions has held thus :
"19. Therefore, from the aforesaid
provisions as well as from the discussion as above, it is clear the Apex Court in Vishnu Prasad Sharma's case was constrained to hold that successive declarations are not permissible because Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act provided for consideration of all objections made to the Notification under Section 4(1) and one report thereafter to the Government. Similarly the Government after considering the report made under Section 5A had to make up its mind whether particular land is needed for public purpose or not and then issue a declaration under Section 6(1). Correspondingly there is no provision in the Act for considering all objections made to
the Notification under Section 28(1) of the Act. There is no provision for submission of one report to the Government. There is no provision for consideration of any such report by the Government before issuing a
707
declaration under section 28(4) of the Act. On the contrary, the language of the Act makes it very clear the Government has to consider the cause shown by the owner of the land and may pass such order as it deems fit and if it is satisfied that any such land should be acquired for the purpose specified in the Notification, it may issue a declaration. In the light of the marked difference in the language employed in Section 28, there is no scope for holding that successive Notifications are not permissible in law. In fact the legislature did not amend the Act because in the Act the provisions similar to consideration of all objections together, submission of a report and consideration of a report and issuing Final Notification are conspicuously missing. If those words had been there and if they had not been amended, then the judgment of the Apex Court would have to be applied with full force. Therefore, merely because the State legislature did not bring about any amendment as was done by the Parliament, it would in no way support the case of the petitioners. Such an amendment in the facts of this case was wholly unnecessary.
20. In the light of what is stated above
we are of the view that the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that under the Act, issuance of successive declarations is permissible. It is not out of place to mention here the acquisition of land under the Act is for an industrial purpose. Under the scheme of the Act first a Notification has to be issued under Section 3(1) of the Act specifying the area to be an industrial area for the purpose of this Act. Section 3 reads as under:
3. Declaration of industrial areas:
(1) The State Government may, by Notification, declare any area in the State to
708
be an industrial area for the purposes of this Act. (2) Every such Notification shall define the limits of the area to which it relates.
21. The object of this provision is to
inform the public that the State Government has taken a decision to form an industrial estate in a particular area, so that the said area may not be used for any other purpose. In fact, Section 4 of the Act specifically provides for alteration of industrial area after issue of a Notification under Section 3(1) of the Act specifying and declaring any area in the State to be an industrial area. The power is vested under Section 4 of the Act to exclude from any industrial area, any area or include therein any additional area as may be specified in such Notification. That is the only mode by which an area which is declared as an industrial area can be excluded from the industrial area. Though the Act came into force from 26th Day of May 1966, Chapter-VII of the Act which deals with acquisition and disposal of land were not made applicable to the entire state of Karnataka. It is only when a land is to be acquired for the purpose of industrial development, after issue of a Notification under Section 3(1) of the Act, Notification has to be issued under Section 1(3) of the Act making Chapter-VII applicable. After Chapter-VII is made applicable to a particular area, then the Government is vested with the power under Section 28(1) of the Act to issue a Notification expressing its intention to acquire such land. When such a land is notified it is not as if every owner of the land would object to the acquisition. There are number of owners
of the land who may be willing to give their consent to acquisition of the land and accept compensation payable under the Act. At the same time the very object of enacting this Act is establishment and development
709
of industrial area and for making available industrial land to the private entrepreneurs to start industries. If a land owner chooses to challenge the acquisition, certainly it takes time before the acquisition is completed. Therefore, under the scheme it is open to the Government to issue a Notification under Section 28(4) in respect of lands where there is no opposition to the acquisition or where they are able to serve the land owners, consider their objections and issue Notification for acquisition. If there is any delay in service of notice, if there are contests and any order of stay or injunction is obtained from Courts, it is not necessary for the Government to wait for conclusion of those proceedings before it could issue a Notification under Section 28(4) of the Act. That is precisely the reason why as is clear from the language employed in Sections 28(3) and (4), the Government is empowered to consider the cause shown by each owner and pass appropriate orders and issue declarations in respect of such owners under Section 28(4) of the Act. It serves the object of the Act. Similarly it also enables the owners of the land who are consenting for acquisition to get compensation expeditiously. Therefore, seen from all angles the legislature has consciously avoiding the pit falls which were found in the unamended provisions of Section 6 and 5A of the Act and to enable the Government to acquire land piece meal by issue of such successive Notifications have not adopted the procedure prescribed under the unamended Sections 6 and 5A of the L.A. Act. In that view of the matter we do not see any substance in the first contention.”
9. In the light of the views expressed herein above, it may be said that there is no provision under the BDA Act, to indicate that upon issuance of a Final Notification and acquisition of a part of the area comprised in the Scheme, that the other
710
lands covered under the Scheme would not be available for acquisition and that a second Final Notification is impermissible. As in any event, the Scheme would lapse if there is no substantial compliance with the Scheme.
10. In the result, the above points for
consideration are answered as follows :
The petitioners having demonstrated that though the lands of the petitioners were duly notified for acquisition, the possession of the lands having remained with the petitioners, even without the benefit of any interim orders of this court, and the Scheme under which the lands had been sought to be acquired, not having been substantially implemented, in so far as the petitioners' lands are concerned, the Scheme to that extent would lapse and the lands of the petitioners except to such extent as has not vested with the State, (the admitted extent of land, utilized for the formation of road- in WP 16590/2004) is no longer available for acquisition under the impugned Notifications.
11. There is no impediment in law for the State
to issue successive Notifications under Section 19 (1) of the BDA Act, but the succeeding Notification shall disclose valid and justifiable reason for such issuance. It is ideal for the State to ensure Finality in the issuance of a "Final Notification" in respect of the proposed acquisition as it would enable other land owners to proceed on the presumption that their land, which may have been initially notified, is outside the purview of the acquisition proceedings. Therefore, the State shall not normally resort to successive Final Notifications unless the land owners are forewarned of further impending Notifications. As seen in Nanjundaiah's case above, the State could very well have indicated that the remaining lands which were not notified in the "first" Final Notification are subject to be notified
before the expiry of five years from the date of the Preliminary Notification.”
711
80. The issue relating to inclusion of 500 acres of
Government land, inclusive of ‘B’ Kharab land without an
order being passed under Section 97 of the Karnataka Land
Revenue Act for diverting the said lands for formation of
Layout, is an issue between the Government and BDA and
necessarily the tank beds and ‘B’ Kharab lands will have to be
retained.
80.1 The contention relating to New Act being applicable
on account of award having not been passed and possession
has not been taken and therefore under Section 24(2) of the
New Act acquisition lapses, is an argument requires to be
considered for the purposes of rejection, inasmuch as,
acquisition having already been upheld by the Apex Court and
scheme having been formulated by the BDA for allotment of
developed land in the ratio of 60:40. In fact, 15% of the
developed plots has been ordered to be allotted to the land
owners and the Government Circular to allot plots to land
owners in the ratio of 60:40, payment of compensation does
not arise.
80.2 One another contention raised is that acquisition
lapsed under Section 27 of the BDA Act. Even when scheme
lapses under Section 27 of the BDA Act, acquisition does not
712
lapse as held by the Apex Court in the matter of OFFSHORE
HOLDINGS (P) LTD vs BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY & ORS reported in (2011) 3 SCC 139:
“38. On a conjunctive reading of the provisions of Sections 27 and 36 of the State Act, it is clear that where a scheme lapses, the acquisition may not. This, of course, will depend upon the facts and circumstances of a given case. Where, upon completion of the acquisition proceedings, the land has vested in the State Government in terms of Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, the acquisition would not lapse or terminate as a result of lapsing of the scheme under Section 27 of the BDA Act. An argument to the contrary cannot be accepted for the reason that on vesting, the land stands transferred and vested in the State/Authority free from all encumbrances and such status of the property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law either by the State Act or by the Central Act. Both these Acts do not contain any provision in terms of which property, once and absolutely, vested in the State can be reverted to the owner on any condition. There is no reversal of the title and possession of the State. However, this may not be true in cases where acquisition proceedings are still pending and land has not been vested in the Government in terms of Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act.”
Thus, what requires to be examined is:
“Whether the BDA has complied with the
directions issued by the Division Bench as
clarified and further directions issued by
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case?”
and consequentially it has to be examine the nature of exercise
that was undertaken by the BDA.
713
81. A plain reading of direction issued by the Division
Bench would indicate that a Memo was filed during the course
of hearing of the appeal by producing the maps of the area
showing lands in the village which are not notified, lands
which were notified under Section 17(1) of the BDA Act, lands
which are notified under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act and said
areas depicted in different colours. On account of lands which
was proposed to be acquired did not form a contiguous area,
and in some of the village certain extent of lands notified under
the Final Notification were surrounded by large chunk of area,
which was not acquired, making access to said land difficult,
which was found to be heart-burning and as such BDA was
confronted with those hard facts. Contents of the said memo
reads:
"Memo filed by Appellant, the Bangalore Development Authority:
1. Without prejudice to the submission that
there is no discrimination in the matter of deletion of lands in the Final Notification and that deletion of certain lands will not invalidate either the Preliminary or the Final Notifications, it is submitted as follows.
2. If this Hon'ble Court were to come to the conclusion that the objections of certain landowners/writ petitioners to the Final Notification are to be considered afresh by the Bangalore Development Authority,
714
directions on the following lines may kindly be issued.
3. The writ petitioners who are landowners
seeking dropping of the acquisition proceedings insofar as their respective lands are concerned, on the ground that: (a) their lands are situated within green belt area; (b) they are totally built up; (c) properties wherein there are buildings constructed by charitable, educational and/or religious institutions; (d) nursery lands; (e) who have set up factories, may be permitted to make appropriate application to the BDA seeking reconsideration for exclusion of their lands from acquisition by producing documents to substantiate their contentions within one month from the date of the order.
3.1 The BDA will consider such requests
keeping in mind the status of the property as on the date of Preliminary Notification. Properties developed, improved, constructed upon, subsequent to the Preliminary Notification will not be considered for deletion.
3.2 The writ petitioners whose revenue sites
have been acquired they shall be allotted with the site of 30 ft. x 40 ft. dimension in terms of the order/direction of this Hon'ble Court dated 20-7-2001 passed in W.P. Nos.20875 to 20938 of 2001 (Anjanapura Scheme).
3.3 The writ petitioners/landowners shall make
appropriate applications within 30 days from the date of this order and thereafter the authority shall consider the applications and pass appropriate orders within period of three months.”
82. As observed hereinabove, BDA was required to
undertake the exercise of examining the claims of respective
715
parties as directed thereunder. BDA was also required to
comply with further directions and clarifications issued by the
Apex Court. In other words, it had to ascertain whether the
claim of applicants would fall within the four corners of
parameters fixed by the Division Bench as well as by the
Hon’ble Apex Court. In this direction BDA has undertaken the
mammoth exercise of conducting spot inspection, ascertaining
the age of buildings existing, if any (namely, as to whether
such buildings came up before issuance of Preliminary
Notification or after issuance thereof) and the Special Land
Acquisition Officers have submitted their reports. In fact,
some of the reports which have been filed have been also
challenged and/or attacked in these writ petitions on the
ground of they being contrary to the factual matrix. We have
already enumerated as to how some of the reports are either
being erroneous or being contrary to facts.
82.1 This Court in exercise of the writ jurisdiction under
Article 226 or in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of
Constitution of India would not be in a position to fathom the
truth or otherwise of such exercise undertaken by BDA. It
would also be necessary to note at this juncture that after
issuance of Preliminary Notification sites have been purchased
716
from the erstwhile owners. There are instances where even
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification, revenue sites
have been purchased by few of the petitioners and they are
said to have put up constructions. There are instances where
the construction put up are in accordance with the building
plan or licence issued by Municipal Authority, Corporation or
Council, as the case may be. In fact, direction issued by the
Division Bench to BDA is to either consider for regularization
or dropping of such portions of lands/sites from acquisition,
who had purchased the same prior to issuance of Preliminary
Notification.
82.2 Some of the petitioners who have been allotted sites
in these lands, which were at one point of time notified and
subsequently denotified in the light of exercise undertaken by
virtue of order passed by Division Bench and the order
upholding acquisition with certain directions and clarification
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court, such allottees have sought for
alternate site in the very same Layout. There may be
instances where such allottees would have already constructed
building/s and have been residing in such building/s by
themselves or through their tenants or might have sold the
property and thereby third party rights having crept in. Even
717
in such circumstances, BDA cannot be heard to contend that
they would not look into those aspects or turn blind eye. In
this regard suitable direction will have to be issued.
82.3 Petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has been allotted a
site bearing No.141 formed in Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur Village,
Arkavati Layout measuring East to West 15 meters and North
to South 24 meters and totally measuring 360 sq.mtrs. as
morefully described in schedule to the petition. Pursuant to
said allotment, Lease-cum-Sale agreement was executed in his
favour on 28.05.2007 (Annexure-A) and possession came to be
delivered pursuant to which Khata was mutated in his name
by the respondent-BDA on 20-06-2007 vide Annexures-B & C
respectively. Petitioner approached respondent – BDA for
approval of building plan and accordingly, it was approved and
licence was granted as per Annexures-D & E respectively. As
is evident from photographs –Annexure-F, building has been
constructed which includes residential building on the rear
side. In fact, petitioner had borrowed loan from State Bank of
India in a sum of Rs.20 lakhs for construction of the house,
which is also evident from consent letter issued by the State
Bank of India on 03.07.2008–Annexure-Q. The total
expenditure incurred for putting up construction on the said
718
site as certified by the Civil Engineer dated 11.04.2008 -
Annexure-R as well as payments made when the construction
was in progress is reflected in the statement produced at
Annexure-S and such payments were made by petitioner
through cheques.
82.4 In this factual scenario, where building has come
up in the site allotted by respondent-BDA in favour of
petitioner, he was into a surprise or shock when land in which
site had been carved out and allotted by BDA having been de-
notified. As such, for quashing of de-Notification process and
to declare that respondents-1 to 5 have no right whatsoever to
demolish the portion of petition schedule property formed in
Sy.No.17/1 of Hennur village and to declare that impugned
Final Notification dated 18.06.2014 as illegal and arbitrary,
petitioner is before this Court.
83. Though petitioner in W.P.No.5228/2015 has
sought for quashing of Final Notification dated 18.06.2014,
this court is not inclined to entertain the said prayer for
reasons more than one.
83.1 Firstly, issuance of Notification for acquiring the
lands specified under said Notification has been upheld by the
Division Bench and affirmed by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case
719
of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. Secondly, land in which
petitioner’s site has been carved out and allotted to him by the
BDA has been de-notified in favour of the owners of land and
they not being parties to the present proceedings, as said
prayer cannot be considered.
83.2 However, the fact remains that pursuant to Final
Notification dated 21.02.2004 whereunder, an extent of 2750
acres of land was sought to be acquired for the purpose of
formation of Layout, land in question has been acquired and
sites have also been stated to be formed, pursuant to which,
allotments were made, Lease-cum-Sale Agreements were
executed, khata was mutated in the names of allottees and
tax has been collected from allottees. Further, plan submitted
by allottees for construction of buildings has also been
approved and license granted to put up construction.
However, under the guise of undertaking re-do exercise
pursuant to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, an extent of 983.12
acres have been deleted either by way of de-notifying the lands
or on account of some of land owners having approached this
court for quashing of the proceedings and having obtained
orders in their favour or said lands being deleted from
acquisition proceedings for the reasons indicated in the orders
720
passed denotifying certain land. But, fact remains that 983.12
acres have been deleted from acquisition out of 2750 acres,
which was the subject matter of Final Notification dated
21.02.2004. In the photograph which has been produced at
Annexure-F by the petitioner has been perused by this Court,
which would clearly indicate that except building of the
petitioner, surrounding lands which can be seen seems to be
more than several acres which are lying fallow and vacant and
yet same has been denotified. The circumstances in which
lands have been denotified cannot be beyond the parameters
fixed by the Division Bench as well by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case. However, on perusal of records
made available by the BDA and various reports, it would
disclose that in several cases where Special Land Acquisition
Officer has undertaken the exercise of visiting the spot along
with Revenue Inspectors has recommended for de-notifying the
lands and BDA on the ground that there is inconsistency
between the said report as well as report of the Assistant
Commissioner, has not accepted the reports of the Special
Land Acquisition Officer and thereby has not deleted or
denotified certain lands. However, intriguing circumstances
this case would unfold is the fact that large tracts of lands
721
though vacant, not developed and not falling within the
parameters fixed by the Division Bench and the Hon’ble Apex
Court has also been deleted or de-notified. It is in this
background, exercise so undertaken by the BDA requires to be
scrutinized at micro level.
84. Sri Somashekhar, learned Advocate appearing for
petitioner in W.P.No.7248/2019 would contend that in the
land bearing Sy.No.79 measuring 4 acres of Dasarahalli
village, revenue sites have been formed way back in the year
1994. He would also contend that surrounding lands have
been deleted and denotified namely, Sy.Nos,45, 75, 47 & 34
bounded East, West, North and South respectively and as
such, he is entitled to the relief as specified in paragraph 160(i)
of BONDU RAMASWAMY's case. He would also contend that
Division Bench has extended the relief to revenue site holders
and similar relief deserves to be granted to the petitioners. He
would also submit that site owners have already constructed
residential buildings and are residing therein and the fact that
betterment charges have been paid and plan having been
sanctioned by the jurisdictional Gram Panchayat would clearly
indicate that petitioners are revenue site owners and as such,
they are entitled to the relief granted by Division Bench.
722
85. Per contra, Sri K N Puttegowda, learned Advocate
appearing for respondent-BDA would support the impugned
Notifications and contends that writ petitions itself are not
maintainable since they are not filed by the aggrieved person
but by association.
85.1 Working plan insofar as P.Dasarahally village
would indicate that Sy.No.79 is bounded on North by
Sy.No.47/7 and 47/8, which have already been acquired and
on eastern side, it is bounded by Sy.No.45, which has been
acquired and Sy.No.34/1 situated on the southern side itself
was either deleted or denotified and so also, land situated on
the western side bearing Sy.No.77. Present petitions are
common writ petitions filed by the association on behalf of
members who are 28 in number and court fee has been paid
accordingly. As such, contention regarding maintainability of
writ petitions stands rejected.
85.2 Petitioners have contended that they have put up
construction over the sites allotted to them except sporadic
construction put up in different plots. It cannot be conclusively
held that on the basis of documents made available, that in
the sites purchased by the petitioners are fully built.
723
86. It is the contention of learned counsel appearing for
the petitioners in W.P.No.37478/2017 & W.P.No.37480/2017
that sites have been formed by the erstwhile owners in the
land bearing Sy.No.104/6 situated at Rachenahalli Village,
K.R.Puram Hobli, after duly converted from agricultural
purposes to non-agriculture residential purposes way back on
23.04.1992 as per Annexure-B and they are in possession and
enjoyment of the said sites and they have obtained khata from
jurisdictional municipal authorities. It is also contended that
even BBMP has issued khata and collected taxes for the year
2017-18. He would submit that there was an agreement
entered into between the erstwhile land owners and the Post
and Telecommunication Department’s Employees Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd and pursuant to same, Layout was formed
and sites have allotted/sold in favour of its members like the
petitioners and authorities having considered the said
representations of the society, as well as representations
submitted by the petitioners for de-notifying the said lands, as
it would pass the test prescribed under the directions issued
by the Division Bench, as clarified and directed by the Hon’ble
Apex Court in the BONDU RAMASWAMY's case and yet, steps
having not been taken by the BDA. They have prayed for
724
quashing the Preliminary and Final Notification insofar as
petitioners’ sites are concerned.
86.1 Per contra, Sri.B.S.Sachin, learned counsel
appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3-BDA would submit that
petitioners are not notified khatedars and they were not
parties to the earlier writ petition and they have not filed any
application seeking for re-conveying the sites they had
purchased. As such question of considering their claim at this
length of time, does not arise.
86.2 However, it is required to be noticed that in the
statement of objections filed on behalf of BDA insofar as
petitioners in W.P.Nos.37478/2017 & 37480/2017 are
concerned, is not only vague but also bereft of any particulars
whatsoever. General and omnibus statements have been made
in paragraph-11 of its statement of objections by denying the
fact that lands surrounding Sy.No.104/6 having been left out
from acquisition is not true. It is stated that petitioners’ land
does not come within the guidelines issued by the Division
Bench of this Court.
86.3 Averments made in paragraph-10 to 16 of the
statement of objections filed by BDA are generic in nature,
without any particulars, insofar as, Sy.No.104/6 except to the
725
extent stated in paragraph-11. It is very intriguing to notice
that in W.P.No.37478/2017, two sets of statement of
objections have been filed. One by the present counsel,
Sri.Sachin B.S. (filed on 29.06.2018) and other one filed by
Smt.A.D.Vijaya, previous counsel (filed on 16.07.2018). In
paragraph-8 of the statement of objections filed by Smt.
A.D.Vijaya, it is stated that request of the petitioner has been
considered and rejected by the Government. It is also admitted
that compensation amount has not been deposited on account
of pendency of the litigations. This itself would indicate as to
the manner in which the matters pending before Courts are
dealt with by the BDA. Even minimum requisite details which
requires to be considered on facts of each case has not been
furnished by the BDA. This would only indicate the
lackadaisical approach of the BDA in dealing with the cases
pending before the Court and also a mirror to the pedantic
approach which BDA adopts, which obviously for the reasons
to keep the litigations pending before the Courts and to ensure
that there is no end to such litigations.
86.4 These matters require to be examined from several
angles namely, the aspirants for sites who have applied with
the BDA and having been waiting eagerly for such allotments
726
from long number of years with a fond hope that they would be
able to construct a roof over their head and they have been
pursuing their claim by submitting application in attempts
and in some cases it can be seen applicants have made more
than ten attempts. Yet, they have not received any allotment
letters from BDA. On the other hand, certain land owners, site
owners including the owners of sites who have been allotted
sites by Housing Co-operative Society like PNT Employees
Housing Societies, Income Tax Department Employees’
Housing Society, Telecommunications Employees’ Housing
Society, Income Tax Department Officer’s Association and the
like and who have purchased such sites, have already put up
construction in the said sites and have been residing in the
said houses, have also knocked the doors of this Court and
running from pillar to post to save their valuable property.
Judgment of the Division Bench as well as judgment of Hon’ble
Apex Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case having come as a
succor to their vows has also not come to their rescue, as
observed herein above, either on account of non consideration
of their representation by the BDA or consideration of the
representation as an eye wash and rejecting it or non
consideration of the application with reference to the factual
727
matrix or not considering the application for denotifying as
having been built up as observed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
the case of BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case vide paragraph-
160(i)(ii) and this has resulted in several unwarranted
litigations and present litigations are such. In fact, in order to
put an end to all these litigations and to resolve the issue in a
transparent manner and to ensure that directions issued by
the Division Bench of this Court and further directions and
clarifications issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court, BDA was
directed to make their stand clear by explaining as to how they
propose to deal with these aspects referred to above and this
Court was expecting a positive stand from the BDA.
Unfortunately, in its usual rigmarole stand which it takes
before Courts, BDA has filed an affidavit through its
Commissioner on 12.06.2019 that too only when learned AGA
intervened in the matter and assured this Court such an
affidavit would be filed. It is stated in paragraph-4 of the
affidavit that there are 2608 revenue sites holders who have
approached the BDA by filing an application for regularization
of their sites or for payment of compensation or to give
alternate sites. However, stand of the BDA in respect of
revenue site holders is that those who have purchased sites
728
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification would be governed
by the resolution dated 18.04.2017 passed by BDA for
regularization of their sites and in such cases, it has been
resolved that where BDA utilized revenue sites for formation of
layout and road, allotment would be made as per the
resolution dated 09.06.2017 namely, in terms of directions
issued in the case of JUNJAMMA AND OTHERS vs. THE
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY reported in ILR
2005 KAR 608 (for short "JUNJAMMA's case") alternative sites
to the revenue site holders would be given. They have also
enclosed resolution dated 18.04.2017 and 09.06.2017
forwarded to the appropriate Government for approval of its
resolutions. As noticed hereinabove, appropriate Government
is also dragging its feet not taking its stand either way, it
would only indicate that sufferings of the individual site
owners or land holders or prospective site allottees rights are
being put into jeopardy on account of attitude adopted by BDA
as well as appropriate Government. In fact, it would not have
been difficult for BDA to place on record with reference to each
of the writ petitions as to whether their claim would fall in any
of the category or conditions stipulated in judgment of Division
Bench or BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case as stated supra. If so,
729
the manner in which such consideration has taken place or
had been considered by the BDA or the net result of such
consideration. As noticed hereinabove the BDA seems too
eager and anxious to withhold such details or information from
being made available to the Court. Neither the statement of
objections filed nor affidavit of the Commissioner dated
12.06.2019 would disclose as to mode, manner and method in
which the representation of these two writ petitioners came to
be considered, dealt with and decided.
86.5 However, optimistic view of this Court has been
shattered on perusal of the affidavit filed by the Commissioner
of BDA, inasmuch as, said affidavit contains no particulars
regarding the manner in which BDA proposes to deal in
respect of different categories of applicants as ordered by
Division Bench and clarified by Apex Court. It is as bald as
baldness could be or as vague as vagueness could be. In fact,
BDA attempted to shirk from its responsibility by shifting the
responsibility on the Government and the communication
dated 18.04.2017 to 07.06.2019 would act as mirror to this
fact. In fact as to what steps BDA has taken subsequent to
the resolution dated 18.04.2017 till 18.03.2019, the affidavit is
silent. This would only indicate that when the matters are
730
taken up by the Courts, BDA has made attempts to show that
it has woken from its slumber and contend before the Court
that it is discharging its statutory obligation, which is not so,
inasmuch as, for past two years i.e., from 18.04.2017 to
18.03.2019, there seems to be no correspondence between the
Government and BDA. Though Government is party to all
these writ petitions, it is also dragging its feet and thereby,
resulting in rights of the parties being put into jeopardy i.e.,
rights of both sets of parties. This has to be necessarily termed
as colourable exercise of powers by the instrumentality of the
State like BDA.
87. On perusal of case papers relating to
W.P.No.57992/2015 it would disclose that after disposal of the
matter before the Division Bench, an affidavit came to be filed
by the petitioner and his brothers on 03.02.2017 declaring
that they own the property jointly. However, this petition has
been filed by one of the brothers and other co-owners are not
arrayed as parties to this petition. Records would also disclose
that undisputedly, Sy.No.118 which is on the northern side of
land in question was not notified for acquisition. So also,
Sy.No.115 situated on the western side. Taking this into
consideration, land bearing Sy.No.116 on the western side has
731
been deleted and land bearing Sy.No.94 situated on eastern
side is also deleted. This would only indicate that respondent-
BDA in terms of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in
BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case, while undertaking exercise of re-
doing has dropped Sy.Nos.116 and 94 from the acquisition
proceedings. No reasons are forthcoming from the statement
of objections filed by respondent-BDA as to how land in
question would not form an isolated pocket or in other words,
as to why acquisition in respect of this isolated pocket
deserves to be continued. Representation dated 26.11.2013
(Annexure-E) has not been considered and disposed of by BDA
and there is no reference to the same in the statement of
objections filed.
87.1 Having regard to the facts obtained in
W.P.No.5276/2014, it is noticed that land bearing
Sy.No.13/34 measuring 22 guntas of Jakkur Village,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, is surrounded by
Sy.No.13/2 on the northern side, Sy.No.13/4 to the East,
Sy.No. 11/10 to the West and Sy.No.13/3B to the South,
which lands have been deleted. After BONDU RAMASWAMY’s
case cited supra, while undertaking the exercise of re-doing
the whole process, the land in question alone is sought to be
732
acquired, which prima-facie would fall within the parameters
of paragraph 160(ii) of the directions issued by Hon’ble Apex
Court.
87.2 As to whether exercise undertaken by the BDA in
deleting adjacent lands Sy.Nos.13/2, 13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B
itself is in serious doubt.
87.3 While narrating the facts of respective writ petitions
hereinabove, it has already been noticed that thrust of
arguments of the land owners relate to non implementation of
the order of Division Bench as well as Apex Court, which can
be summarized as:
(a) Though adjacent lands have been denotified,
lands belonging to the writ petitioners have not
been denotified or dropped from the acquisition
proceedings;
(b) Claim made by the petitioners for deleting their
lands on the ground of lands in the vicinity have
been developed and as such those lands have
been deleted, was not considered by BDA.
Hence, petitioners have sought for deletion of their lands.
There is prima facie justification in such claims. However, at
the same time, it has to be noticed by this Court that
subsequent to BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and under the
733
guise of implementing the said order, reports have been
furnished by the Land Acquisition Officer and by using pick
and choose method certain lands have been deleted from
acquisition either on the ground that it is built up or it is
landlocked, which is factually otherwise. This view of the
Court gets fortified from the following facts:
(i) In W.P.No.48880/2014 the petitioner therein
is claiming for deletion of 0.54 guntas of land
in Sy.No.85/3 of Amruthahalli Village,
Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk,
contending the lands on all the three sides
namely, lands situated in Sy.No.86, 84 and
115 on the northern, eastern and southern
side of Sy.No.85/3 has been deleted. The
working plan of Amruthahalli Village
produced by the BDA indicated that on all
the three sides of Sy.No.85/3 the lands have
not been acquired for Arkavathi Layout. In
the endorsement issued to the petitioner
therein it does not even disclose that the
exercise that has been undertaken by the
BDA was in pursuance to BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
(ii) Even in respect of Sy.No.103/3 and 103/4
which is the subject matter of
W.P.Nos.47823-824/2015 the lands
surrounded on eastern, western, northern
734
and southern side bearing no.103/5, 102/2,
103/2, 102/5 are either not the subject
matter of acquisition or it has been deleted.
(iii) Even in respect of property bearing
Sy.No.13/3A measuring 22 guntas situated
at Jakkur Village, Yelahanka Hobli, which is
surrounded by lands bearing Sy.No.13/2,
13/4, 11/10 and 13/3B have not been
notified for acquisition at all.
(iv) Insofar as land measuring 18 guntas
situated in Sy.No.81/3B of Rachenahalli
Village, K R Puram Hobli, Bangalore East
Taluk, which is the subject matter of
W.P.Nos.54358-59/2014 is concerned,
which is sought for being deleted on the
ground of adjacent lands having been
deleted when examined with reference to the
records, it would disclose that above said 18
guntas of land is bounded on East by
Sy.Nos.81/2A and 81/2B, West by halla and
Sy.Nos.82, 83/1, north by Sy.Nos.81/3B
and 84/2 and south by Sy.No.81/3A. These
three (3) lands have been notified for
acquisition.
88. Even according to BDA subsequent to FFN dated
23.02.2004 and prior to issuance of modified Notification
dated 18.06.2014, about 988 acres of land has been denotified
for which acceptable and justifiable reasons are lacking. To
735
put it differently, facts discussed hereinabove is contrary to the
stand of BDA.
89. In the light of aforestated facts, this Court is of the
considered view that these aspects will have to be dealt by
examining the claims afresh and for ensuring there is clear
and absolute transparency in the said process, it would be apt
and appropriate to constitute a Committee. The Committee is
accordingly constituted comprising of following three (3)
persons to look into the various aspects as indicated in the
order hereinabove and as also morefully indicated in the
operative portion of this order. The Committee shall comprise
of the following persons:
(1) Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana, Former Judge-High Court of Karnataka No.10/11, Manasa,
Singapore Gardens, Green Fields-1, Gubbilala Gate, Kanakapura Road, Bengaluru - 560 062 - - CHAIRMAN
(2) Sri.Sandeep Dave, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary
#N-73, Diamond District, Old Airport Road, Bengaluru-560 008 - - MEMBER
(3) Sri.N.S.Megharikh, IPS (Retd.)
Former Director General of Police-CID,
Economic Offences and Special Units Government of Karnataka #A-33, Legacy ESTILO, Doddaballapur Road,
736
Avalahalli, Yelahanka, Bengaluru - 560 064 - - MEMBER
90. The Commissioner-BDA shall be the Ex-Officio
Convener. This Court directs the Commissioner-BDA to
consult the Chairman and its Members of the Committee
and accordingly fix and pay the remunerations. BDA is
directed to provide the necessary assistance, transport
and other logistical support to the Chairman and
Members of the Committee for holding the meetings. The
Chairman of the Committee is authorized to appoint
requisite staff, if need be, on temporary basis to assist the
Committee in conducting the meetings and also fix their
salaries, which shall be paid by the BDA. The BDA is also
directed to provide necessary office space at its Head
Office for smooth functioning of the Committee within an
outer limit of three (3) weeks from today. The Committee
would be at liberty to take requisite assistance of any of
the employees of the BDA or the State Government
including Surveyors either from BDA or of the State
Government for the purposes of carrying out spot
inspection, marking, inspection, etc and for overall
implementation of this order.
737
91. For the reasons aforestated, I proceed to pass the
following:
ORDER
(i) The challenge made to the Notifications Nos.
BDA/COMMR, KLAO/LA9/104/2002-03,
BANGALORE, dated: 03.02.2003, No. UDD 193
MNX 2004, BANGALORE, dated: 23.02.2004
and No. UDD 426 MNJ/2011, BANGALORE,
dated 18.06.2014, stands rejected and
acquisition of the lands for the formation of
Arkavati Layout is upheld.
(ii) W.P.Nos.815/2016 c/w 6717/2016 is allowed
and writ of mandamus issues to the BDA –
respondent No.1 to conclude the allotment
process of site No.BK90, Arkavati Layout,
expeditiously, at any rate within an outer limit of
three months from the date of receipt of this
order. In the alternate, if site BK90 is not
available BDA shall allot alternate site and
execute Lease-cum-Sale Agreement in favour of
the petitioner, issue Possession Certificate and
deliver vacant possession of site so allotted,
738
expeditiously and at any rate within 30 days from
the date of issuing the endorsement to the
petitioner that site bearing No.BK90 not being
available. It is also made clear that within 7 days
from the date of this order, BDA shall intimate
petitioner as to whether site No.BK90 allotted to
him on 31.05.2016, is available or not.
(iii) W.P.Nos.47461/2016 & 48412-14/2016 are
hereby dismissed.
(iv) W.P.No.21361/2017 is allowed and writ of
mandamus issues to BDA directing the said
Authority to execute absolute sale deed in favour
of the petitioner expeditiously at any rate within
an outer limit of three (3) months from the date of
receipt of this order.
(v) W.P.No.751/2016 is allowed and writ of
mandamus issues to the BDA to allot a site
measuring 30’ x 40’ in favour of petitioner
expeditiously at any rate within an outer limit of
three (3) months from the date of receipt of this
order.
739
(vi) W.P.Nos.3178/2017 c/w 55737/2016,
10923/2015, 58734/2016, 15588/2017,
14868/2017, 30485/2017 & 59317/2016 and
similarly placed writ petitions stands disposed of
by directing the BDA to place the representations
of all the applicants/petitioners submitted for
allotment of sites for being considered by the
Committee constituted hereinabove. It is also
made clear that all such applications which have
been filed for allotment of sites under any of the
categories specified in the order of the Division
Bench or the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case shall be considered by the
Committee keeping in mind the directions issued
thereunder and subject to order passed at
paragraph (xiv) hereinbelow.
(vii) W.P.No.43194/2017 is hereby allowed in part
and a writ of mandamus issues to the BDA to
allot one (1) site in favour of the petitioner, the
measurement of which shall be same as indicated
in the Lease cum Sale Agreement executed in
favour of petitioner by BDA on 28.02.2007.
740
(viii) W.P.Nos.38463/2014, 19783-784/2018,
46766/2014, 47606/2014 & 48579/2014,
stands dismissed.
(ix) W.P.No.1876/2016 stands disposed of and BDA
is directed to place the representation of the
petitioner, who is a revenue site holder and all
similar representations/applications of the
revenue site holders before the Committee for
examining their claims in the background of
Division Bench judgment as affirmed by Apex
Court in BONDU RAMASWAMY’s case and as
undertaken in paragraph No.3.2 of the Memo
filed by the BDA before the Division Bench.
(x) W.P.No.29541/2015 is allowed in part and a writ
of mandamus issues to the BDA to execute the
Lease cum Sale Agreement in favour of the
petitioners in respect of site Nos.B9-SC-2201 and
B5-SF-2137, which sites have been allotted as
per allotment letters dated 09.11.2007
(Annexures-R2 and R3 respectively).
(xi) The applicants/writ petitioners who are claiming
relief based on sale transactions which has taken
741
place subsequent to issuance of Preliminary
Notification dated 03.02.2003, would not be
entitled to any protection or relief whatsoever and
their claim stands rejected.
(xii) It is also made clear that neither the Committee
nor the BDA would be required to examine or
consider the claim where dispute with regard to
title is involved.
(xiii) The BDA shall allot the site to all such applicants
in whose favour allotment had been made and
later cancelled on the ground of same site having
been allotted to two (2) persons or cancelled for
whatsoever reason like it has fallen in the land
deleted from acquisition and like reasons.
(xiv) All deletions or deNotification recommended by
the BDA or made by BDA or by the Government,
is subject to the certification or approval by the
Committee to the effect that such deletion of land
is in accordance with the law laid down by the
Division Bench and directions/clarifications
issued by the Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case.
742
(xv) It is also made clear that in the event of
applications or representations having not been
submitted by the applicant/s pursuant to the
order of the Division Bench or BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case, they would be at liberty to
submit the same to the BDA within one (1) month
from the date of this order and on receipt of said
representations or applications, it shall be placed
by the BDA before the Committee constituted
hereinabove within ten (10) days after expiry of
one (1) month.
(xvi) The civic amenities sites earmarked in the map/s
or Arkavati Layout Plans, if located as an isolated
plot or island and such plots if not being adjacent
or abutting to the sites formed in Arkavati
Layout, such lands may not be feasible for
acquisition and Committee would examine such
claims and based on physical verification and a
report shall be forwarded by the Committee to
BDA either to retain such lands for acquisition or
recommend for deletion as the case may be, upon
743
receipt of such report BDA shall take further
steps.
(xvii) A writ of mandamus issues to BDA to execute
Lease cum Sale Agreement and possession
certificate in favour of all such allottees, who had
been allotted sites and on account of pendency of
the present proceedings, further steps had not
been taken. The BDA shall also ensure that
katha of the sites so allotted and possession
delivered is issued in favour of such allottees. The
said exercise shall be undertaken by the BDA
forthwith and at any rate within an outer limit of
three (3) months from today.
(xviii) The BDA shall consider the claim of all such
allottees, who have been allotted site/s in
Arkavati Layout, but later cancelled due to redo
exercise and shall allot the site/s to such of those
applicants/allottees expeditiously and at any rate
within an outer limit of three (3) months from the
date of receipt of copy of this order and it is also
made clear that in the event of such site/s not
being available in Arkavati Layout, they shall be
744
allotted sites in any other Layout within the
timeframe stipulated hereinabove.
(xix) Registered agreement holders or agreement
holders together holding registered General Power
of Attorney namely, if such documents have come
into existence contemporaneously prior to
issuance of Preliminary Notification dated
03.02.2003, would be entitled to seek for
allotment of site from BDA and all such
applicants would be at liberty to submit
application/representations to BDA within one
(1) month from today and all such
representations received by the BDA shall be
placed before the Committee constituted by this
Court within ten (10) days after expirty of one (1)
month and on report being submitted by the
Committee, BDA would be at liberty to make
allotment of sites or issue endorsement assigning
the reasons for rejection of claim, if any.
(xx) The Committee constituted hereinabove shall
implement the order passed in
W.A.No.2624/2005 & connected matters on
745
25.11.2005 in the matter of THE
COMMISSIONER, BDA AND OTHERS vs. STATE
OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS and order passed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.4097/2010
and connected matters on 05.05.2010 in the
matter of BONDU RAMASWAMY AND OTHERS
vs. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS
and in addition to the same, said Committee
shall also:
(a) Examine all such representations
received by BDA pursuant to Division
Bench order and BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s judgment placed before
the Committee and submit a report to
the BDA as to whether such claim/s
would fall within the exceptions carved
out under the judgments for deleting the
lands or not. The BDA shall thereafter
take steps to delete or include such
lands from acquisition.
746
(b) The Committee shall also consider the
representations of the land owners
submitted to BDA which shall be placed
before the Committee to ascertain as to
whether the lands of the applicants are
landlocked and/or adjacent lands
having been dropped from acquisition
without dropping the lands of the
applicants. The Committee shall
examine the claim on case to case basis
and on being satisfied either such claim
being genuine or being contrary to
factual scenario shall prepare a report
village wise and forward the same to the
BDA to enable the said authority to
either delete such lands from acquisition
or conclude the acquisition.
(c) The Committee shall either by itself or
through its empowered officers carryout
inspection of all 16 villages where sites
have been carved in Arkavati Layout by
identifying such sites in respect of which
747
allotment letters, possession certificate
has been issued and recommend to the
BDA to handover possession of such
sites to the allottees forthwith for
ensuring the process of allotment is
taken to its logical end by forwarding a
report in that regard to the BDA
expeditiously and preferably within a
period of four (4) months today. On
receipt of such report from the
Committee, BDA shall expeditiously and
not later than one (1) month from the
date of receipt of such report shall
execute the Lease cum Sale Agreement
or absolute Sale Deed, as the case may
be, by confirming possession of such
sites having been handed over or
delivered to the allottees.
(d) The Committee shall examine as to
whether the claim of land owners for
deleting their lands from being acquired
is within the parameters or the
748
directions issued by the Division Bench
and the Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case and if so, shall
submit a report to the BDA to the said
effect and pursuant to the same BDA
shall take steps accordingly to either
delete the land or proceed with allotment
of the sites to the applicants that may be
formed in such lands.
(e) The Committee shall examine as to
whether deletion of land/s from
acquisition made by the BDA is within
the parameters fixed by Division Bench
and BONDU RAMASWAMY's case by
examining every such deletion made on
case to case basis and particularly with
reference to deletion made on the
ground of adjacent lands having been
deleted.
(f) The Committee shall also examine the
claim of the applicants on case to case
basis for deletion of lands on the ground
749
of area being built-up by considering or
looking into the scientific evidence that
may be secured by the Committee as
noticed hereinabove.
(g) The Committee shall examine the claim
of the applicants on case to case basis
for deletion of lands from acquisition on
the ground of buildings having been
constructed by ascertaining as to
whether such buildings have come up
prior to the Preliminary Notification
dated 03.02.2003 or thereafter. It is
made clear that such buildings/sheds
constructed with asbestos sheets or tiled
roof, shall not be eligible to be
considered as a pucca building for the
purposes of exclusion from acquisition
even if so claimed by the applicants.
(h) The Committee shall examine as to
whether deletion of 983.12 acres of land
by the Government subsequent to the
Notification dated 23.02.2004 and before
750
issuance of Notification dated
18.06.2014 was in accordance of dicta
laid down by the Division Bench and in
compliance with directions/clarifications
issued by Hon’ble Apex Court in BONDU
RAMASWAMY’s case and submit a
report to the BDA, who shall take steps
based on said report.
(i) The Committee shall also examine the
applications of revenue site holders for
allotment of sites in accordance with the
extant Circular of BDA dated
09.06.2017 and Resolution dated
18.04.2017 keeping in mind the law laid
down in JUNJAMMA’s case and also
keeping in mind paragraph 3.2 of the
memo filed before the Division Bench
whereunder BDA has undertaken to
allot a site measuring 30' X 40' in favour
of revenue site holders, whose revenue
sites had been acquired, which would be
in terms of the order/direction issued in
751
W.P.Nos.20875-938/2001 dated
20.07.2021 (Anjanapura Scheme).
(j) The Committee shall examine as to
whether on Layout/s formed by Housing
Co-operative Societies or House Building
Co-operative Societies or registered
Union or registered Association wherein
sites have been formed and allotted to
its Members wherein construction of
buildings have come up by conducting
spot inspection either by itself or
through its empowered officers and if
the Committee is of the view that it is a
self contained Layout, a report to said
effect shall be submitted to BDA, upon
which BDA shall delete the said lands
from acquisition. However, it is made
clear that if BDA has taken possession
of such lands and has already formed
sites, allotment made, then claim of the
Members of the Co-operative Society for
allotment of alternate site would only be
752
considered by the BDA and it is made
clear that said benefit would be available
only to the applicants or Members of the
Society/Union/Association, who have
purchased the property under registered
sale deed from such Housing Co-
operative Society or House Building Co-
operative Society or Registered Union or
Registered Association, as the case may
be.
(k) The BDA shall publish the operative
portion of this order in any two (2)
vernacular newspapers consecutively on
two (2) dates within a gap of 10 days
from today, so as to avoid issuance of
individual notices by the Committee and
it is made clear that there would be no
need or necessity to issue individual
notices by the Committee.
(l) The Committee would at liberty to
examine as to whether BDA has
undertaken any exercise to delete lands
753
suo motu and if it is so found, the
exercise so undertaken by BDA would
stand quashed if it is not in conformity
with the order passed by the Division
Bench as affirmed and clarified by the
Apex Court, to which effect the
Committee shall submit a report to BDA
and on such report being submitted, the
deleted lands would stand restored to
BDA for the purposes of formation of
sites in Arkavati Layout to be allotted to
the applicants in waiting.
(xxi) All lands which are the subject matter of
acquisition for the purpose of Arkavati Layout if
having been converted, layout formed, sites
carved and constructions having been put-up
prior to issuance of Preliminary Notification dated
03.02.2003, would be entitled for deletion from
acquisition, subject to report being submitted by
the Committee to the said effect.
(xxii) All writ petitions which have not been specifically
dealt with hereinabove is deemed to have been
754
disposed of in terms of the above order and all
pending interlocutory applications stands
consigned to records.
(xxiii) No order as to costs.
SD/- JUDGE
*sp/DR