wp6 trends in biodiversity - review impacts - explore trends in catch data - explore trends in...
DESCRIPTION
WP6 deliverables D6.1 Relevance of commercial catch data (18) D6.2 Biodiversity indicators: trends, monitoring evaluation of information (24) D6.3 Patterns of distributions from survey (from some CSs)TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
WP6 trends in biodiversity
- Review impacts
- Explore trends in catch data
- Explore trends in survey data
- Options for assessing trends in invertebrates
- Identification of indicators
![Page 2: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WP6 contributors/objectives
Ifremer 6Cefas 5Imperial 1IPIMAR 4MI 3HCMR 5IEO 1MRI 7
Participants
+ Case studies
- review impacts
- explore trends (landings/catch/surveys)
- options for invertebrates biodiversity
- selection of biodiversity indicators
- spatial scale: Case study
Objectives
![Page 3: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
WP6 deliverables
• D6.1 Relevance of commercial catch data (18)
• D6.2 Biodiversity indicators: trends, monitoring evaluation of information (24)
• D6.3 Patterns of distributions from survey (from some CSs)
![Page 4: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Links with MarineStrategy Framework Directive
(MSFD)• Descriptors of MSFD:
– 1 - Biological diversity is maintained. [...] quality and occurrence of habitats [...] distribution and abundance of species are in line with [...] geographic and climatic conditions
– 4 - Marine food web [...] normal abundance and diversity [...]– 6 - Sea-floor integrity [...] structure and functions [...] safeguarded
[...] benthic ecosystems [...] not adversely affected– 10 - [...] marine litter do not cause harm
![Page 5: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Example: descriptor marine litter
–10 - [...] marine litter do not cause harm
![Page 6: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MSFD descriptors addresed in WP6
• 1: biological diversity (species diversity metrics)• 4: food web, not addressed (*)• 6: sea floor: can be addressed with VMS (availability?)
– proportion of the seafloor impacted?– use of EU-CoralFISH results
• 10: marine litter: no data.– Define protocol for on-board observations in the long term monitoring
strategy ? • part of task 7.3: Prototype short- and long-term management and monitoring
framework for deep-water fisheries and stocks in the NE Atlantic
(*) preys mainly mesopelagic with little data
![Page 7: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
List of indicators• Taxonomic distinctness, other diversity metrics
from surveys• Simple indicators (landings/catch/survey):
– S (richness)– proportion of large species, small species, chondrichthyans , vulnerable
species (e.g. from observer data), etc– Discard rate– Number of discarded species
• Invertebrates: – Is it a matter
of monitoring diversity or conservation of VMEs ?
– Relevant spatial scale– Footprint approach: distribution
of fishing effort frozen to current (VMS) ?
Catch: on-board observations
![Page 8: WP6 trends in biodiversity - Review impacts - Explore trends in catch data - Explore trends in survey data - Options for assessing trends in invertebrates](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1bbc7f8b9ab0599d10d1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Links with other WPs
• WP5: BRPs and HCRs– Fish diversity and invertebrates in HCRs
• Include in HCRs ?• Use as constraint to choose HCRs with lesser diversity impact ?• ....
• WP7: Managements strategies– If footprint approach for invertebrates/VMEs, how to integrate
in management strategies ?– How to account for fish species diversity in MS ?– ...