wsha disaster readiness conference wenatchee, washington may 29, 2013

17

Upload: bernadette-bailey

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Hazard Mitigation Planningfor Health Care Systems

WSHA Disaster Readiness ConferenceWenatchee, Washington

May 29, 2013

Hazard Mitigation Planning

What is Mitigation? Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate

long term risk to people, property and the environment from natural or manmade disaster. Example: establish redundant communication system, increase

isolation capacity, ensure water storage to sustain operations.

Why Have a Mitigation Plan?  Mitigation plans help to pre-determine possible projects and,

looking at those capabilities that already exist, include certain projects or decide ways those projects can be accomplished.

Mitigation plans save lives/property and reduce vulnerability to hazards.

Mitigation plans also determine eligibility to apply for federal grant funds as they become available.

Available Federal Grants

Two Types of Grants: Pre-Disaster Mitigation GrantsHazard Mitigation Grants

 Grant applications go through WA EMD and are funded either from FEMA directly or the State utilizing FEMA funds.

Pierce County Plan Overview

• Region 5 Health & Medical Mitigation Plan – Nine Hospitals and Medical Organizations

• included JBLM

• First attempt (successful) at Planning for Health/Medical Systems in Washington State

• Used Secondary Impacts

Pierce County Plan Overview

Hospitals and Medical Facilities unique Required a different perspective in Vulnerability Indirectly affected by hazardsUsed Secondary Hazards

Utility Failures – boilers, electrical, sewage, Medical gases, HVAC

Communication FailuresEmployeesFireInformation SystemsMedical Equipment Failures Supply disruptions

Hazard Mitigation Plan Process Letters of Intent from participants are necessary for

Hazard Mitigation Planning grants.Hazard Mitigation Teams are formed to oversee the

development of the Plan and Planning Teams are formed to represent each jurisdiction.

Public Meetings at the beginning and end of the process are held to inform the jurisdiction and the public of the planning effort.

Meetings with governing Public Officials are held at the beginning to commit members to support of the Plan, including dedicated staff time.

Final Resolution from governing Public Officials completes the process.

Hazard Mitigation PlanningPlan Contents:

Profile: a description of the jurisdiction(s): location, size, population, land use, geography, topography, urban/rural, etc.

Capabilities: what resources are available to the planning team to develop the plan? Land Use Regs, Policies, Ordinances, other plans.

Risk Assessment: identification of hazards and risk maps are developed

Infrastructure: identification and location of critical infrastructure is evaluated with the Risk Maps developed in the Risk Section

Risk Assessment

Portrays threats of natural and human caused hazards

Vulnerabilities of communities to the hazardsConsequences of hazards impacting

individual communities or jurisdictions.

RISK

Threat

VulnerabilityConsequence

Risk Assessment-Vulnerability Analysis

Vulnerability is analyzed in terms of exposure of both population and infrastructure to each hazard.

GIS is required for Vulnerability Analysis and creating hazard maps.

THREAT

LAND VALUE IMPROVED VALUE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE

Total ($) % Base Avg. Value ($) Total ($) % Base Avg. Value ($) Total ($) % Base Avg. Value ($)

BASE $423,100 100% $211,550 $1,788,400 100% $894,200 $2,211,500 100% $1,105,750

Technological

Pipeline Hazard

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Terrorism 423,100 100% 211,550 1,788,400 100% 894,200 2,211,500 100% 1,105,750

Transportation Accidents

423,100 100% 211,550 1,788,400 100% 894,200 2,211,500 100% 1,105,750

Risk Assessment-Consequences

Identified as anticipated, predicted, or documented impacts caused by a given hazard.

Graphically illustrate exposures from the Vulnerability Analysis for each hazard.

THREAT CONSEQUENCEYES

OR NO

Meteorological

Drought

Impact to the Public/Patients NoImpact to the Employees No

Impact to COOP in the Organization NoImpact to Property, Facilities and

Infrastructure NoImpact to the Institution’s Economic

Condition No

Flood

Impact to the Public/Patients NoImpact to the Employees Yes

Impact to COOP in the Organization YesImpact to Property, Facilities and

Infrastructure NoImpact to the Institution’s Economic

Condition No

Severe Weather

Impact to the Public/Patients YesImpact to the Employees Yes

Impact to COOP in the Organization YesImpact to Property, Facilities and

Infrastructure Yes

Impact to the Institution’s Economic Condition Yes

WUI Fire

Impact to the Public/Patients NoImpact to the Employees No

Impact to COOP in the Organization NoImpact to Property, Facilities and

Infrastructure NoImpact to the Institution’s Economic

Condition No

Risk Assessment-Hazard Maps

Hazard Mitigation PlanningPlan Contents (continued):

Mitigation Strategies: developed to protect the identified infrastructure and protect the jurisdiction assets, population and properties

Plan Maintenance: a plan to identify who will be responsible for plan implementation, review progress and keep policy-makers informed

Process: Developed at the last of the process, it outlines how the plan was developed and by whom, it measures the Plan against the Disaster Management Act requirements

Hazard Mitigation PlanningAdoption Process:

Public Official Meetings are held to authorize (Final Resolution) the submission of the plan to WA EMD

 WA EMD approves the Plan (30 days) and sends it to FEMA(45 days) for their approval

FEMA returns an accepted Plan for the jurisdiction(s) and the plan is taken to the respective governing Public Officials for the formal approval and adoption by resolution

The finalized PLAN is sent to FEMA

The Jurisdiction has a Plan and it is now eligible to make claims for damages from disaster, or apply for Pre Disaster Mitigation grants for Mitigation Projects

Example of Final ResolutionRESOLUTION #

A RESOLUTION OF THE (Organization) NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ADOPTION 

 

WHEREAS, the (organization) is a member of the Western Pierce County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee; and

 WHEREAS, the (organization) recognizes the economic loss, personal injury and damage that can arise from these natural hazards; and

 WHEREAS, reduction of these impacts can be achieved through a comprehensive, coordinated planning process identifying hazards and vulnerabilities and pairing them with mitigation strategies; and

 WHEREAS, the Hazard Mitigation Plan has been submitted and approved by the State Emergency Management Division and the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and

 WHEREAS, (Organization) cooperated with Pierce County to develop a joint Hazard Mitigation Plan for the participating agencies;

 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY (Organization) of PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS:

(Organization) does hereby adopt the (Organization) Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. ADOPTED BY (Organization) OF PIERCE COUN TY, WASHINGTON on ___________, 201_.__________________________President ATTEST: _________________________Secretary  

Success Stories. . .Pre Disaster Mitigation Grants

Pierce County DEM (retrofits, planning grants)

Pierce County Surface Water ManagementPacific Lutheran UniversityCrystal River Ranch

Questions? Katie Gillespie

Mitigation [email protected]

253-798-3311

Debbie BaileyMitigation Coordinator

[email protected]

Kathy McVayHealth Coordinator

[email protected]