wths 2012-13 student achievement data and analysis

25
WTHS 2012-1 3 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA AND ANALYSIS MR. DENNIS H. BEST - PRINCIPAL

Upload: walden

Post on 22-Feb-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and Analysis. Mr. Dennis H. Best - Principal. Presentation agenda. Overviews of the following data sets Keystone Examinations – Winter and Spring Waves SAT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT. GRADE 11 - ALGEBRA I – WINTER WAVE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

WTHS 2012-13 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA AND

ANALYSISMR. DENNIS H. BEST - PRINCIPAL

Page 2: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

PRESENTATION AGENDAOVERVIEWS OF THE FOLLOWING DATA SETS• KEYSTONE EXAMINATIONS – WINTER AND SPRING WAVES• SAT • ACT • ADVANCED PLACEMENT

Page 3: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

GRADE 11 - ALGEBRA I – WINTER WAVE

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced010203040506070

6.2 7.221.1

65.5

9.2

26.3 30.6 35.3

12.7

30.6 28.9 27.8

1st Time Testers (194) Re-Testers (240) State (33,590)

• 86.6% of 1st time testers scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.• Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data

(PVAAS).

Page 4: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

GRADE 11 – BIOLOGY – WINTER WAVE

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

102030405060

2434.5 34.1

7.43.8

5042.3

3.9

29.2 32.4 29.2

9.2

1st Time Testers (296) Re-Testers (26) State (100,050)

• Curricular changes have been made to better prepare CSD students for the Biology Keystone examination.

• Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data (PVAAS).

Page 5: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

GRADE 11 – LITERATURE – WINTER WAVE

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

10203040506070

8.517.5

60.8

13.20

66.7

33.3

09.2

22.2

55.3

13.3

1st Time Testers (461) Re-Testers (3) State (111,638)

• 74 % of 1st time testers scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.• Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data

(PVAAS).

Page 6: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ALGEBRA 1 – SPRING WAVE – ALL TESTERS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

10203040506070

14.7

4129.5

14.816.4

35.628.6

19.416.5

57.8

23.3

2.59.4

47.332

11.3

WTHS 1st Time Testers (709) State 1st Time Testers (155,357)State Re-Testers (93.514) WTHS Re-Testers (203)

• Overall, 43.3 % of 1st time testers scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.• Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data (PVAAS).

Page 7: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ALGEBRA I – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 9

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

1020304050

14.7

41.9

25.717.720

44.6

26.2

9.1

WTHS Grade 9 (389) State Grade 9 (80,940)

• 43.4 % of WTHS 9th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 35.3 % of 9th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels across the state.

Page 8: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ALGEBRA 1 – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 10

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0102030405060

12.3

34.8 37.4

15.520.9

51.6

21.5

6

WTHS Grade 10 (374) State Grade 10 (59,623)

• 52.9 % of WTHS 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 27.5 % of 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels across the state .

Page 9: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ALGEBRA 1 – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 11

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced010203040506070

13.4

63.1

22.8

0.7

18.7

56.1

21.4

3.8

WTHS Grade 11 (149) State Grade 11 (53,755)

Performance levels of WTHS 11th grade students was similar to that of 11th grade students across the state.

Page 10: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ALGEBRA I – SPRING WAVE – HISTORICALLY UNDERPERFORMING STUDENTS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

102030405060

24.3

46.4

20.9

8.4

27.8

49.6

18.1

4.5

WTHS (407)State (121,568)

• 29.3% of Historically Underperforming WTHS students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 22.6% of Historically Underperforming students across the state scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

Page 11: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

BIOLOGY – SPRING WAVE – ALL TESTERS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0102030405060

12.522.6

40.2

24.725.4 26.932.4

15.326.1

54.4

18.9

0.6

30.9

51.5

17.1

0.5

WTHS 1st Time Testers (575) State 1st Time Testers (132,984)WTHS Re-Testers (180) State Re-Testers (48,254)

• 64.9 % of WTHS 1st time testers scored at either the advanced or proficient levels. • Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data

(PVAAS).

Page 12: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

BIOLOGY – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 9

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0102030405060

1 5.7

42.950.5

19 23.635.2

22.2

WTHS (105) State (46,858)

• 93.4 % of WTHS 9th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels. • 57.4 % of 9th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels across

the state.

Page 13: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

BIOLOGY – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 10

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0

10

20

30

40

14.3

26.3

40.2

19.227.9

31.7 29.8

10.6

WTHS (463) State (83,158)

• 59.4 % of WTHS 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 40.4 % of 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels across the state.

Page 14: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

BIOLOGY – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 11

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced0102030405060

27.8

53.5

18.2

0.5

32.2

45.5

16

1.2

WTHS (187) State (50,625)

Performance levels of WTHS 11th grade students was similar to that of 11th grade students across the state.

Page 15: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

BIOLOGY – SPRING WAVE – HISTORICALLY UNDERPERFORMING STUDENTS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced01020304050

29.634.3

26.9

9.1

43.934.6

17.7

3.8

WTHS (297) State (81,968)

• 36% of Historically Underperforming WTHS students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 21.5% of Historically Underperforming students across the state scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

Page 16: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

LITERATURE – SPRING WAVE – ALL TESTERS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced010203040506070

8.222.4

59.4

10.11026.1

52.7

11.216.8

60.2

23

0

16.6

54.6

28.5

0

WTHS 1st Time Testers (465) State 1st Time Testers (115,802)WTHS Re-Testers (113) State Re-Testers (39,817))

• Overall, 69.5 % of 1st time testers scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.• Appropriate analysis of these results is not possible without value-added data (PVAAS).

Page 17: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

LITERATURE – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 10

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced010203040506070

7.8

22.5

59.5

10.29.7

27.4

51.9

11

WTHS (462) State (98,106)

• 69.7 % of WTHS 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 62.9 % of 10th grade students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels across the state.

Page 18: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

LITERATURE – SPRING WAVE – GRADE 11

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced010203040506070

18.1

58.6

23.3

0

14.7

46.136

3.2

WTHS (116) State (45,050)

Page 19: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

LITERATURE – SPRING WAVE – HISTORICALLY UNDERPERFORMING STUDENTS

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced01020304050

18.8

39.2 37.6

4.3

20.4

44.4

32.9

2.4

WTHS (255) State (77,784)

• 41.9% of Historically Underperforming WTHS students scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

• 35.3% of Historically Underperforming students across the state scored at either the advanced or proficient levels.

Page 20: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

SUMMARY OF KEYSTONE DATAWHAT DO THESE SCORES TELL YOU ABOUT THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT AND GROWTH?

• IN THE ABSENCE OF VALUE-ADDED (PVAAS) DATA IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS.

TO WHAT DO YOU ATTRIBUTE THE AREAS OF STRENGTHS AND NEEDS REPRESENTED BY THESE DATA?

• TEACHERS ARE EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTING THE CURRICULUM AND MANY STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO ACCESS THE CURRICULUM.

HOW WILL YOU ENSURE THAT THE AREAS OF STRENGTH ARE MAINTAINED AND AREAS OF NEED ARE ADDRESSED/REMEDIED?

• ANALYZING MULTIPLE MEASURES OF STUDENT DATA (DEMOGRAPHICS, ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND SCHOOL PROCESS) TO DRIVE DECISION-MAKING.

Page 21: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ACT AND SAT?

• THE ACT IS AN ACHIEVEMENT TEST, MEASURING WHAT A STUDENT HAS LEARNED IN SCHOOL. THE SAT IS MORE OF AN APTITUDE TEST, TESTING REASONING AND VERBAL ABILITIES.• THE ACT HAS UP TO 5 COMPONENTS: ENGLISH, MATHEMATICS, READING, SCIENCE, AND AN

OPTIONAL WRITING TEST. THE SAT HAS ONLY 3 COMPONENTS: CRITICAL REASONING, MATHEMATICS, AND A REQUIRED WRITING TEST.• THE SAT HAS A CORRECTION FOR GUESSING. THAT IS, THEY TAKE OFF FOR WRONG ANSWERS.

THE ACT IS SCORED BASED ON THE NUMBER OF CORRECT ANSWERS WITH NO PENALTY FOR GUESSING.• THE ACT HAS AN INTEREST INVENTORY THAT ALLOWS STUDENTS TO EVALUATE THEIR INTERESTS

IN VARIOUS CAREER OPTIONS.

http://www.actstudent.org/faq/actsat.html

Page 22: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

SAT OVERALL MEAN SCORES (CLASS OF 2013)

Critical Reading Mathematics Writing440450460470480490500510520

486497

466

494504

482496

514

488

WTHS (314) State (101,368) Total (1,660,047)

The PSAT was administered to nearly all WTHS 10th grade students this fall.

Page 23: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ACT (CLASS OF 2013)

English Mathematics Reading Science Composite192021222324

20.5

22.5

21.3 21.6 21.622.2

23 2322.2

22.7

WTHS (82) State (26,171)

Page 24: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ADVANCED PLACEMENT (AP) TESTING PARTICIPATION

Group AP Students AP Exams Administered

WTHS 231 370

State 61,172 105,206

Global 2,221,200 3,944,774

Page 25: WTHS 2012-13 Student Achievement Data and  Analysis

ADVANCED PLACEMENT SCORE SUMMARY

% of Students with Scores 3+55

60

65

70

7571.4

68.3

60.8

WTHS State Global

“Success” on an AP exam is defined as an exam score of 3 or higher, which represents the score point that research finds predictive of college success and college graduation (CollegeBoard, 2013).