www.coe.int/lang m eeting the challenge of multilingual classrooms : exploiting plurilingual...
TRANSCRIPT
www.coe.int/lang
ww
ww
.coe.i
nt
MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOMS:
EXPLOITING PLURILINGUAL REPERTOIRES, MANAGING TRANSITIONS AND DEVELOPING PROFICIENCY IN THE
LANGUAGE(S) OF SCHOOLINGIntergovernmental seminar Strasbourg, 7-8 March 2012
www.coe.int/lang
ww
ww
.coe.i
nt
DEVELOPING ‘ACADEMIC LANGUAGE’ IN SECONDARY EDUCATION
Eike Thürmann
Predictor for mathematical competence
Variance: Prediction rate in %
Socioeconomic status
16.5
Migration status 3.0
Cultural capital 2.0
Pre-school education 1.6
Family language 0.5
Employment father 0.3
Family structure ns
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 3
What matters: Not the language per se, but the variety normally used for
teaching and learning in
formal education
(Prenzel et al. 2004)
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 4
There is an urgent need to turn around this situation: What we need is a
PEDAGOGY OF RIGOUR AND HOPE
I maintain that it is possible for second language learners to develop deep
disciplinary knowledge and engage in challenging academic activities if
teachers know how to support them to achieve their potential.
Aída Walqui (2006)
CHANGE OF PARADIGM:
From „how teaching and learning of content
is organised“ to
„how content is taught and learnt
in a language-sensitive way“
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 5
Principles Goals
Sustain academic rigour
Hold high expectations
Engage students in quality interactions
Sustain a language focus
Develop quality curriculum
Walqui, A., L. van Lier (2010). Scaffolding the Academic Success of Adolescent English
Language Learners: A Pedagogy of Promise.
WestEd
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 6
LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING:Dual focus on content and language across the
curriculum – A whole-school language policy
Three strategies (and tools) to create awareness (also of non-language specialists!):
I. A Curricular framework for academic language competencesII. A Checklist for the evaluation of language-sensitive content teachingIII. A set of techniques for subject-based language scaffolding
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 7
I. ACADEMIC LANGUAGE SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE END OF MANDATORY SCHOOLING
1. General classroom interaction: negotiation of meaning and participation
2. Information retrieval and processing3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and
discourse functions4. Documenting, presenting and exchanging of learning
results
5. Availability of linguistic means and language elements
Extensive analysis of curricular documents – Chamber of Commerce requirements for vocational training – random
sample of task-setting in school-/textbooks - …
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 8
I. ACADEMIC LANGUAGE SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE END OF MANDATORY SCHOOLING
task
negotiation of meaning
information retrieval
cognitive activities
presentation of results
Semiotic systems
genre diagram Picture
Basic cognitiv-communicative
functions
Name describe
…
Availability olf linguistic means
Word level Sentence level Text level
What can we do to protect our ground-water? Make a class poster and write all the things we can do …
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 9
1. Basic General classroom interaction: negotiation of
meaning and participation
Students can clarify conditions for handling and completion of tasks, organise their work procedures effectively and arrive at results..
putting relevant questions and asking for clarification where
necessary
reacting appropriately to statements by other peers or teacher
reading carefully through instructions for work and tasks to be
carried out in order to be certain what is expected and under what
conditions
…10 indicators
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 10
3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and discourse
functions
Students can use appropriate language strategies and tools to process information, experience, and ideas applying basic language/discourse functions.
This entails mastering the following cognitive and language skills in particular:
NAMING/DEFINING – DESCRIBING – REPORTING/NARRATING – EXPLAINING –
ARGUING/TAKING (UP) A STANCE – JUDGING/VALUING – MODELLING/SIMULATING
25 indicators
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 11
3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and discourse functions: e.g ARGUING/TAKING (UP) A STANCE
e.g. clarifying the advantages and drawbacks of differing facts and ways of behaving, weighing (up) and discussing the pros and cons to arrive at a personal viewpoint .
e.g. taking a stance for real-life situations which demand crucial decision-making (e.g. abortion, medicide) by resorting to arguments based on Christian ethics.
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 12
2. Information retrieval and processing
4. Documenting, presenting and exchanging of learning results
Genre-based curriculum stream
(Hammond 2001)16 indicators8 indicators
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 13
5. Availability of linguistic means and language elements
• level of individual words and collocations : e.g. o using one’s knowledge about the structure of composite nouns and
adjectives to decipher the meaning of technical terms (e.g. burn-able, in-flamm-able], acid-resistant]
• Sentence level: e.g.o indicating the impersonal nature of statements through the use of
the passive or other appropriate forms of expression (such as “X can be measured” and “it should be added that”)
o accurately describing features (for example by adding attributes and attributive clauses)
• Level of the text: e.g. o avoiding presuppositions o introducing new topics/content in a well-ordered fashion 38 indicators
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 14
Religious Education
BOTTOM-UP VERIFICATION
• appropriately labelling living things, objects, processes, events, topics and viewpoints
• assessing and specifying their specific characteristics
• Identify and correctly name seasons and most important festivities of the Christian Church Year (e.g. Lent, Passion Time, Pentecost, Advent, Christmas …)
• Identify and denote most important Jewish and Muslim festivities
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 15
II. A CHECKLIST FOR THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING
1. Dual-focussed transparent target-setting = 6 indicators2. Teacher´s use of language = 9 indicators3. Classroom interaction and opportunities for verbal action = 13
indicators4. Subject-specific language scaffolding = 7 indicators5. Linguistically adequate materials and media for teaching and
learning = 7 indicators6. Assessment of language competences = 6 indicators
Areas of observation
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 16
1. In my geography classes I communicate the specific language requirements of content teaching to my pupils in such a way that they fully understand which language activities they are expected to perform and which language competences they are supposed to acquire.
++ + - --
1.1 At the beginning of a teaching unit I clearly point out and explain what we want to find out (= geography content) as well as which language competences and activities are relevant for successfully dealing with tasks and assignments. e.g. →in the shape of dual/focused advance organizers
Indicators 1.2 – 1.6
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 17
Glossary for subject specialists (language pedagogy)
e.g.: Advance organizer = information that is presented prior to learning and that can be used by the learner to organize and interpret new incoming information. They provide the necessary scaffolding for students to ….
In language-sensitive content teaching a. o. have a dual focus and raise students´awareness for subject-specific content as well as pertinent language competences.
Focus on content Focus on language
At the end of the up-coming teaching unit we will have learnt
in which way water is distributed across the globe
how we specify measures of quantity in absolute and relative terms (e.g. water covers 70.9% of the Earth's surface) and how we transform diagrams (bar charts, pie charts) into descriptive statements
in which states water appears on earth and which properties can be attributed to ….
how to connect to connect single descriptive statements and arrive at a short coherent written text …
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 18
II. A CHECKLIST FOR THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING
Self-evaluation
Reflective teaching
Peer-evaluation
classroom developmentteacher training
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 19
III.A SET OF TECHNIQUES FOR SUBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE SCAFFOLDING
• Task-based organisation of learning• Extend periods of written work (writing across the curriculum,
writing to learn science)• Decelerate rate of classroom interaction• Make use of plurilingual competences (language awareness)• Terminology: visualise subject-specific cognitive concepts• Extend repertoire of „grammar words“ (synsemantica)• Offer list of functional „chunks“ to choose from• Extend wait time• Open up triadic dialogues (IRF-cycles)• Discover the distinctive features of subject-specific genres• …
E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 20
Hammond, Jennifer (ed.) (2001). Scaffolding. Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education. Newtown, Austr. (PETA).
Walqui, A., L. van Lier (2010). Scaffolding the Academic Success of Adolescent English Language Learners: A Pedagogy of Promise. WestEd
Walqui, Aida (2006).Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. In: The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9/2. 159-180. http://www.educacion.gob.es/exterior/centros/losangeles/es/series/201003-Scaffolding-Walqui.pdf