www.hoarelea.com wind farm noise impact assessment noise predictions – source data and propagation
TRANSCRIPT
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Wind Farm Noise Impact Assessment
NOISE PREDICTIONS – SOURCE DATA AND PROPAGATION
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Source
Propagation
Receiver
The situation to be assessed ….
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
VH
V10
SWLv = SPLv + 10 x log ( 4 x p x r2 ) – 6dB
Source Sound Power (IEC 61400-11)
rH
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
ISO 61400-11: Frequency based data
Third octave SWL
Narrow band tonal assessment
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Sound power values?
• Tested sound power (IEC 61400-11) with reported test uncertainty σ
• Warranted values: includes “safety margin” of typically up to 2dB(A)
…… but sometimes not (commercial considerations)• Turbine specification: additional uncertainty in warranty?• Declared values: procedure of IEC 61400-14 for adding
uncertainties (1.654 σ)
N.B: test results are LAeq data, so LA90 prediction is obtained by subtraction of 2dB
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Source
Propagation
Receiver
The situation to be assessed ….
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Propagation models
• ‘Exact’ numerical methods(e.g. parabolic equation, fast field program)
• Approximate semi-analytical methods(e.g. ray tracing)
• Empirical ‘engineering’ methods(e.g. ISO 9613-2, Concawe)
Input data
Calculation implementatio
n
Output results
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 1
• Spherical spreading of noise
• Atmospheric attenuation
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 1
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
32 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Rel
ativ
e so
un
d p
ress
ure
lev
el, d
B
> 2MW turbine at 1000m
< 1MW turbine at 500m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 1
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 2
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 2
In ISO 9613-2: modelled by ground factor coefficient G (0 to 1)
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 2
• G = 1 : soft, porous groundground covered by grass or treescultivated farming land
Not used as it will often under-predict
• G= 0: hard groundpaving, water ice, concrete, etc.Industrial ground
Robust but can over-predict, particularly with warranted source data
• G= 0.5: mixed ground
Used with warranted source data or tested data + uncertainty
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 3
Refraction effects…
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 3
Hot
Cold
Temperature lapse
Upwind
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 3
Hot
Cold
Temperature inversion
Downwind
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 4
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 4
Sound energy enters ‘shadow region’ via turbulent scattering
335 340 3450
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sound speed (m/s)
Hei
ght
(m)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Distance (m)
Limiting ray
Shadow
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation – 3 + 4
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Comparison of PE and ISO 9613 results
20m
200m
1000m
Harmonoise PE model (based onannual measured meteorological conditions [Salomons])
ISO 9613(based on typical downwind propagation conditions)
Percentage of time below stated noise level, %
Calc
ula
ted n
ois
e level,
dB
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 6
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 6
In downwind conditions: limited to no more than 2 to 3 dB
Terrain = noise barrier?
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Factors affecting sound propagation - 6
“Valley effect”: +3 dB
hm ≥1.5 abs(hs-hr)/2
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Measurement studies
• 3 Separate wind farm sites, both located in rural environments and each comprising more than 20 turbines
• Two-speed turbines rated at over 2MW peak generating capacity, 60 to 70m hub height
• Type 1 sound meters continuously sampling statistical and equivalent data at varying distances, with double wind-shield arrangements
Published 2007-2009
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Measurement locations: from approximately 100m to 750 m from nearest turbine
• Very flat terrain• Minimal vegetation• Propagation path covered by peat bog• Ground prone to flooding – saturated for duration of survey
Wind Farm Envelope
NSite B
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Site B
Single site wind speed (G = 0 / 754m)
Site B - Measurement Location 4 (754 m)
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s)
Tot
al L
A90
Noi
se L
evel
(dB
)
Measured Downwind
Predicted
Poly. (Predicted)
Poly. (MeasuredDownwind)
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Turbine specific wind speed (G = 0 / 754m)Site B - Measurement Location 4 (754 m)
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s)
Tot
al L
A90
Noi
se L
evel
(dB
)
Measured Downwind
Predicted
Upwind (±45º)
Poly. (Predicted)
Poly. (MeasuredDownwind)Poly. (Upwind (±45º))
Site B
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Turbine specific wind speed (G = 0 / 754m)
Site B - Measurement Location 4 (754 m) - G=0, variable WS
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s)
To
tal L
A9
0 N
ois
e L
evel
(d
B)
Upwind Trendline
Predicted WTG Noise
Measured Total Noise
Site B
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Turbine specific wind speed (G = 0 / 754m)Site B - Measurement Location 4 (754 m) - G=0, variable WS
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s)
To
tal L
A90
No
ise
Lev
el (
dB
)
Upwind Trendline
Measured WTG Noise(Corrected)
Predicted WTG Noise
Measured Total Noise
Site B
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Site B - Measurement Location 4 (754 m) - G=0, variable WS
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Hub Height Wind Speed (m/s)
To
tal L
A90
No
ise
Lev
el (
dB
)
Upwind Trendline
Measured WTG Noise(Corrected)
Predicted WTG Noise
Measured Total Noise
Turbine specific wind speed (G = 0 / 754m)
+2dB(A) “warranty” margin added
~5dB
Site B
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Main measurement locations: from approximately 100m to 820
m from nearest turbine
• Lightly undulating but acoustically flat terrain• Minimal vegetation surrounding turbines, forestry close to
locations• Ground cover of mixed soft ground and flooded areas
N
Wind Farm Envelope
P1P2
P3P4
P5
Predictions are made for:• high speed mode only• G=0.5• tested sound power data +
1dB(Stated test uncertainty)
Site C
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Location P4: 700 m distance
Turbine only (predicted)
Turbine + background
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Wind Speed at 10m (m/s)
Noi
se L
eve
l L90
dB
(A)
Measured (turbine + background)
Predicted turbine (G=0.5)
Poly. (Measured (turbine + background))
Site C
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Additional research
Evans and CooperComparison of predicted and measured wind farm noise levels and implications for assessments of new wind farms
Paper Number 30, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2011 2-4 November 2011, Gold Coast, Australia
“Steady slope” “Concave”
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Recommendations For use and application of ISO 9613-2 to WTN
• LA90 = LAeq – 2 dB
• Use spectrum data if available
• 4m receiver height
• 10 degrees / 70% humidity
• Do not use G=1• G=0.5 recommended,
with source levels which incorporate test uncertainties
(as in most warranties or “declared“ values as per IEC 61400-14)
• For propagation across a valley add +3dB
• Terrain screening: no more than -2dB
• State all assumption and input data
w w w . h o a r e l e a . c o m
Thank you