www.oncologyeducation.com ecco esmo 2011 gi cancer updates “ velour” study author: j tabernero...
TRANSCRIPT
www.OncologyEducation.com
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates
“VELOUR” Study
Author: J Tabernero et al
Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry
Date posted: October 27, 2011
www.OncologyEducation.com
Results from VELOUR, a Phase 3 Study Of Aflibercept Versus Placebo In Combination With FOLFIRI For The Treatment Of Patients With
Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Results from Prespecified Subgroup Analyses
Presenter: J Tabernero (Vall d’Hebron University Hospital / Barcelona/ Spain)
www.OncologyEducation.com
Background
• Aflibercept – Soluble fusion protein
– Consists of portion of extracellular domains of human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 fused to human IgG1 Fc portion
– Binds all VEGF-A isoforms, VEGF-B and PlGF
• VELOUR study clinical results presented at World GI – this review summarizes that clinical data and the subgroup analyses presented at ESMO
www.OncologyEducation.com
R
Aflibercept 4 mg/kg IV, day 1 + FOLFIRI q2 weeks
FOLFIRI q2 weeks
N=1200
Primary Outcome:OS
Study Design
www.OncologyEducation.com
RESULTS
FOLFIRIFOLFIRI+
AFLIBERCEPTp-value
Response Rate (%) 11.1 19.8 P= 0.0001
PFS/TTP (median,
mos) 4.67 6.90 P=0.00007
OS
(median, mos)
12.06 13.5 HR=0.82P=0.0032
www.OncologyEducation.com
GR 3/4 TOXICITY
FOLFIRI
%
FOLFIRI+
AFLIBERCEPT
%
Diarrhea 7.8 19.3Neutropenia 29.5 36.7Complicated Neutropenia 2.8 5.7Stomatitis 5.0 13.7Infections 6.9 12.3Hand Foot Syndrome 0.5 2.8
Dehydration 1.3 4.3
www.OncologyEducation.com
GR 3/4 TOXICITY
FOLFIRI
%
FOLFIRI+
AFLIBERCEPT
%Proteinuria* 1.2 7.9
Hypertension 1.5 19.3
Haemorrhage 1.7 2.9
Epistaxis 0 0.2
GI origin 1.0 2.0
Venous TE 6.3 7.9
PE 3.5 4.7
ATE 0.5 1.8
Fistula (GI origin) 0.2 0.3
Wound healing 0 0.3
GI perforation 0.3 0.5
www.OncologyEducation.com
STUDY COMMENTARY
• Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI in mCRC in 2nd Line mCRC in OS and PFS benefits :– statistically significant but of questionable
clinical significance
• However there were signifcant toxicities associated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept
www.OncologyEducation.com
BOTTOM LINE FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
• Given the 6 wk improvement in OS in the face of significant toxicities, aflibercept has a poor therapeutic ratio
• In addition – given the Canadian standard of first line FOLFIRI – ? how to extrapolate results of this trial
(efficacy and toxicity) to use with second line FOLFOX
www.OncologyEducation.com
Part 2:Subset Analyses of Patients
Previously Treated With Bevacizumab
www.OncologyEducation.com
Background
• Non-randomized data from the BRiTE observational study suggested that bevacizumab post progression first line might be beneficial to patients (Grothey, JCO, 2008) – This observation needs to be confirmed in a
randomized study
www.OncologyEducation.com
Background (cont’d)
• This is the first randomized study of a 2nd line VEGF inhibitor where some patients had been treated previously with Bevacizumab – Although this will not give a definitive answer, the
subset analyses of patients previously treated with bev in this study can provide some insight into whether there might be merit in continuing VEGF inhibition post progression
www.OncologyEducation.com
7
Pre-Specified Subgroup Analyses
• Goal: to confirm consistency of the effect of aflibercept on OS and PFS
• Methodology: impact assessment on pre-specified subgroups:
– FOCUS ON : Stratification factors •Prior bevacizumab
www.OncologyEducation.com
ESMO STOCKHOLM 2011 8
Methodology for Pre-Specified Subgroups Analyses
• For each parameter, a Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used for the overall population, including the parameter, the treatment effect and the treatment by parameter interaction.
• Interactions between treatment and each subgroup were tested at the 2-sided 10% level– ie, a p-value > 0.1 indicates no evidence of
heterogeneity of treatment effect across the subgroups for each factor.
• Safety was analyzed according to prior treatment with bevacizumab
Tabernero et al. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(2): Abstract 6LBA
www.OncologyEducation.com
15
Prior Treatment with Bevacizumab
Placebo/FOLFIRIN=614
Aflibercept/FOLFIRIN = 612
Yes 187 (30.5%) 186 (30.4)
No 427 (69.5%) 426 (69.6%)
www.OncologyEducation.com
16
Overall Survival: Patients with or without Prior Treatment with
Bevacizumab - ITT Population
Placebo/ FOLFIRI
Median (mos)N = 614
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI
Median (mos)N = 612
P-value for interaction
All Patients
12.1 13.5
Prior BEV
No 12.4 13.9P=0.7231
Yes 11.7 12.5
Interaction between “treatment arm” and “prior bevacizumab” factor was not significant at the 2-sided 10% level (p = 0.7231).
Improvement in OS was consistent regardless of prior
treatment with bevacizumab
www.OncologyEducation.com
20
Safety:Anti-VEGF Associated Events (Gr 3/4)Overall Population vs Patients With Previous Bev
OVERALL PREV BEV
N = 611 N =187
% %
Proteinuria* 7.9 8.6
Hypertension 19.3 16.6
Haemorrhage 2.9 3.2
Epistaxis 0.2 0GI origin 2.0 2.7
Venous thromboembolic event 7.9 8.0
Pulmonary embolism 4.7 2.7
Arterial thromboembolic event 1.8 2.1
Fistula 0.3 0
Compromized wound healing 0.3 0.5
GI perforation 0.5 0
www.OncologyEducation.com
Major Adverse Events (Grade 3/4)
AFLIBERCEPTPlacebo
(N = 605)
Grade 3/4 Grade 3/4
Prior Bev
(N=187)
No Prior Bev
(N=424)
% % %
Proteinuria
Hypertension
Haemorrhage- Epistaxis- GI Origin
Dysphonia (PT)
Headache (PT)
Venous thromboembolitic event
Pulmonary embolism
Arterial thromboembolitic event
Fistula
Compromised wound healing
GI perforation
8.6
16.6
3.2
0
2.7
0.5
1.1
8.0
2.7
2.1
0
0.5
0
7.5
20.5
2.8
0.2
1.7
0.5
1.9
7.8
5.7
1.7
0.5
0.2
0.7
1.2
1.5
1.7
0
1.0
0
0.3
6.3
3.5
0.5
0.2
0
0.3
www.OncologyEducation.com
Summing Up
Pre-planned subgroup analyses supported consistency and of the efficacy results across all domains, including prior treatment with bevacizumab.
•Prior treatment with bevacizumab does not appear to significantly impact the safety profile of aflibercept
•This subset analyses supports the observations from the BRiTE study regarding the potential benefit of contiued VEGF inhibiton after progression on a VEGF inhibitor
•The first definitive answer will come next year at ASCO from the German randomized study outlined on the next slide
TML (ML18147): bevacizumab post-progression randomised phase III trial
Prospective, open-label, randomised phase III studyPrimary endpoint: OSSecondary endpoints: OS from start of first-line therapy, PFS, ORR,
safety
First progression
Standardfirst-line
chemotherapy + bevacizumab
(n=810)R
AN
DO
MIS
AT
ION
Standard second-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab
Standard second-line chemotherapy
Results Expected ASCO 2011