www.sppconsulting.com.au griffith university round 13 sport crc bid support workshop homework for...
TRANSCRIPT
www.sppconsulting.com.au
Griffith University
Round 13 Sport CRC bid support
Workshop homework for program coordinators 25-Mar-2010
Prepared By: SPP, March 2010, v2
Program 1
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 2Strictly private and confidential
Objectives
• To refine the program details developed in the Canberra workshop (including projects to deliver key end-user driven outputs)
• To map the projects to (end-user driven) outputs, usage and impacts (benefits) - identify key milestones for delivery and take-up (usage) of outputs and timeline for benefit delivery
WHAT YOU WILL NEED TO DO:
Wednesday March 31st
• Send completed disciplines required and program on a page (POP) slides to Michelle ([email protected] ) and cc both Graham ([email protected] ) and Holli ([email protected] )
[Note: funding and participants sections have deliberately been removed as this information is not required for next week]
Tuesday April 6th
• Complete and send remaining slides including to Michelle, Graham and Holli (having reviewed with Michelle over phone during previous week)
Thursday April 8th (Melbourne workshop)
• Present your Program including POP, LOS and usage
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 3Strictly private and confidential
An initial view of the CRC research outputs has been identified
The following outlines an initial view of outputs identified as relevant by the ASC. The research projects must be designed to deliver key outputs required by end-users.
SPORT CRC
Understanding sport participation
(who/where/why)
Understanding the factors which influence involvement in sport
• A new approach to enable design of sport systems for mainstream and marginalised communities within Australia
Development of sport systems and infrastructure
(how)
Fostering the development of sustainable sporting organisations, systems and infrastructure
Systems that:• Promote greater participation in sport and sporting
organisations
• Increase linkages across organisations and between formal and semi-formal/informal sport
• Better integrate competing sport systems – to foster increased participation and increased cross pollination across organisations
• Help clubs, trainers, coaches, NSOs, schools and community groups to create welcoming sporting communities
Approaches to:• Enhance the capacity of sporting organisations,
systems and infrastructure
• Creating welcoming sporting communities
• Sharing current and new sporting infrastructure to maximise value for communities and sporting organisations
Demonstrating and monitoring sport impacts
(what benefit)
Demonstrating the role and impact of sport for Australian communities, individuals and society as a whole
• Evidence for why we should invest in sport (rather than something else e.g. medical)This may include evidence for the impacts of sport on social, economic and environmental factors
• Understanding the competing priorities in sports funding and approaches to effectively prioritising funding to maximise desired impacts
We will determine why, where and how Australian should invest in sport in order to drive better health, social, community and successful sport outcomes
Source: SPP analysis.
Vision:
Programs:
Research outputs:
DEFINITIONS: Approach: Ideas or actions to assist with program design
System: Underlying structure which can be used to deliver a program
INITIAL VIEW, DISCUSSED AT WORKSHOP
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 4Strictly private and confidential
Summary of the 3 programs following the Canberra workshop
Understanding how to harness human potential
Understanding the limitations to participation – identifying best practices and system failings
Understanding the value proposition of new sport systems
Understanding participation – quantitative and qualitative auditing of participation in sport and sport systems
Developing new sport systems
Meeting sport infrastructure demands
Creating systems to meet changing demands for sport (integration)
Approaches and systems for sport capacity building
Stimulation of demand for sport
Roll-out and assessment of new sport systems
Mechanisms to increase community wellness
Mechanisms to increase economic benefits
Mechanisms to contribute to local/national identity
Mechanisms to increase physical and mental health
Teams identified likely projects within each program to meet the articulated end-user outputs. Program coordinators, please review and if any changes are required please make these on slide 5.
CHECK! Are the projects conveyed in a manner which can be understood by a lay person? Are the projects aligned with the goals of the CRC and the needs of the end-user organisations identified?
CHECK! Are the projects conveyed in a manner which can be understood by a lay person? Are the projects aligned with the goals of the CRC and the needs of the end-user organisations identified?
Source: SPP approach.
MF note: The above projects are all about measuring impact –
There needs to be a project on roll out it this is to happen in
program 3 (based on previous programs systems will not be
designed around health, community well being or
economic benefits – rollout needs to be separate)
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 5Strictly private and confidential
Sports management/business/marketing
Fields Must have? / Nice to have?
• Marketing• Management• Economics
Humanities/social sciences
Fields Must have? / Nice to have?
• Psychology• Ethics• Sociology• Community development• Politics • Law• Education
Identify the key disciplines/research fields which the CRC will need in order to deliver the desired (end-user driven) research outputs for Program 1. Some possibilities have been included below. Consider: Which of these are nice to have and which must we have? Delete any disciplines which are not relevant to this program.
A multidisciplinary approach is required to deliver the desired research outputs
Source: SPP approach.
Design/planning
Fields Must have? / Nice to have?
• Architecture • Planning• Design
+Sports science/medicine
Fields Must have? / Nice to have?
• Sport and health• Biomechanics• ICT
CHECK!! – Are all the required disciplines represented? If the problem would benefit from input from additional disciplines
then seek additional CRC partners with these skills
Complete by Mar 31st
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 6Strictly private and confidential
Program 1 summary (POP): Understanding how to harness human potential
• Understanding the factors which influence involvement in sport
• To clarify the new social/cultural principles that will be needed to design new systems for sport and drive a more effective sport value chain
BRIEF PROGRAM GOALS:
INTERIM PROGRAM LEADERS: Cliff and Keith
OUTPUTS: USAGE: IMPACTS:
Summarise the key elements of the program on this template.
Source: SPP approach.
PROJECTS:
• Understanding participation – quantitative and qualitative auditing of participation in sport and sport systems
• Understanding the limitations to participation – identifying best practices and system failings
• Understanding the value proposition of new sport systems
Complete by Mar 31st
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 7Strictly private and confidential
Program line of sight (LOS): Understanding how to harness human potential
PROGRAM LEADER:
PROJECTS POTENTIAL ESSENTIAL RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS (list organisation only)
OUTPUTS: USAGE:(Who will use the output? How/why will it be used?)
IMPACTS:
• Understanding participation – quantitative and qualitative auditing of participation in sport and sport systems
Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
• Understanding the limitations to participation – identifying best practices and system failings
Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
• Understanding the value proposition of new sport systems
Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
Project 4 Output 1
Output 2
Output 3
Summarise the key elements of the program on this template.
Source: SPP approach.
CHECK!! - - For each project is there a clear line of sight from the research activities to the end-users who will
utilise them to deliver a benefit (if this cannot be demonstrated then the project is not consistent with the
goals of the CRC program)
Complete by Apr 6th
Sports CRC Workshop – 25-Mar-2010 – Program 1 Homework pack v2 Page 8Strictly private and confidential
Program benefits: Understanding how to harness human potential
Benefits must be mapped back to specific outputs and end-users for each program. Benefits can be monetary or non-monetary. Copy slide if additional space is required.
END-USER: USAGE: IMPACT / SPECIFIC BENEFIT:
Source: SPP approach, 2008.
PROGRAM OUTPUT:
OUTPUT 1
OUTPUT 2
OUTPUT 3
<Example: Industry partner>
<Example: Aus. Government>
<Example: Develop product XYZ for commercialisation to consumers>
<Example: Development of new policy for ABC>
<Example: Improved quality of life for users of product XYZ>
<Example: Increased productivity of users of product XYZ, which benefits their employers
<Example: Decreased cost of delivering service to user>
CHECK! – Is there a clear path from the research outputs to the benefits that will be delivered i.e. is the process for how the
benefits will be realised clear and realistic?
CHECK! – Is there a clear path from the research outputs to the benefits that will be delivered i.e. is the process for how the
benefits will be realised clear and realistic?
Complete by Apr 6th