yaŞar university faculty of architecture, department of ... · abstraction of architectural forms,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Grade % Total %
20%100%
100%
30%
20%
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 0250 Environment & Experience in Game Design 2018-2019 SpringSemester
Student No
Student Name
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Instructors
TOTAL
TOTAL
60%
25%
15%
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coord.)
Signatures
3.1. Experience
3.2. Elements
Grading Scale
1. Homework(25%)
Total Term GradeTOTAL
3.4. Clarity of communication
3.3. Mechanics
25%
25%
1.1. Critical thinking 60%
Evaluation Criteria
EVAL
UAT
ION
2. Project(25%)
3. Final Project(50%)
20%1.2. Accuracy
2.1. Development
2.2. Clarity
2.3. Practice
1.3. Procedure
![Page 2: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
63Grade %
Submission
Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the composition, comprehension of figure/ground relation, application of invisible guidelines in composition, craftsmanship.
5%
5%
Submission
Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the composition,comprehension of invisible guidelines in composition, the diversity of relations between geometries, pattern potentiality, variation, craftsmanship.
5%
5%
Submission
Abstraction of the animal, choice of abstraction type, appropriate use of scale and proportion, relation between the grids, the use of design principles in composition, the use of appropriate colors, craftsmanship.
5%
5%
Submission
Consistency of organization principles and ideas with the finalized composition, the use of invisible guidelines in composition, the diversity of relation between geometries, dealing with varying shapes and sizes, negative and positive area control, balance, contrast, variation, craftsmanship.
5%
5%Sketch Process Sketching of the ideas 1%
Submission
Evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, cratsmanship.
6%
7%Sketch Process Sketching of the ideas 2%
Submission
Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, craftsmanship.
6%
8%Sketch Process Sketching of the ideas 2%
Submission
Ability to deal with 3D relations, control of solids and voids, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance of negative- positive areas, the geometries emerged with the intersection of geometries, giving the idea of composition with the principles of design, use of appropriate color scheme, variation, balance of light and shadow, craftsmanship.
8%
10%
Part 1&2 Grades
Idea development, solid/void relations, open/semi close/close relation of spaces, presentation design and creativity, balanced use of linear/planar/volumetric elements, color and material choices, quality of technical drawings, model quality.
15%
Final Jury
Idea development, solid/void relations, open/semi close/close relation of spaces, presentation design and creativity, balanced use of linear/planar/volumetric elements, color and material choices, quality of technical drawings, model quality.
35%
50%Participation Participation 5%
5%
A 95-100 4,0A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3,0B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2,0C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1,0F 0-49 0,0
Signatures Grading Scale
Lect. (PhD) Emin Özgür Özakın
Project VI 8%
Project VII 10%
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 1110 Basic Design for Interior Architecture I 2018- 2019 Spring Semester
InstructorsStudent No
Lect. (PhD) Emin Özgür Özakın Student Name
Final Project 50%
TOTAL
Total Term Grade
Evaluation Criteria
Project I 5%
TOTAL
Project II 5%
TOTAL
Project III 5%
TOTAL
Participation %5TOTAL
Project IV 5%
Project V 7%
![Page 3: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Grade % Total %
20%
100%
100%
20%
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
Evaluation Criteria
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 2252 Modelling & Rendering for Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester
InstructorsStudent No
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Lecturers: Ertan Demirkan
Student NameRes.Assist. Cemre Çubukçuoğlu
1.2. Accuracy 20%
1.3. Clarity of Communication
1.1. Use of Technology 60%
2.2. Accuracy 20%
2.3. Clarity of Communication 20%
2.1. Use of Technology 60%
Grading Scale
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coord.)
TOTAL
3. Final Exam(35%)
3.1. Use of Technology 60%
3.2. Accuracy 20%
3.3. Clarity of Communication
Total Term Grade
Signatures
Lect. Ertan Demirkan
EVAL
UAT
ION
1. Quiz(40%)
TOTAL
TOTAL
2. Homework(25%)
![Page 4: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Grade % Total %
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques
1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Usage of Technology, Stylized Renders1.1.4.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards 1.1.2. Manual And Digital Rendering Techniques1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards1.1.2.Moodboards 1.1.3.Layout Design & Grid System
100%
1.1.1.Research & Benchmark1.1.2. Warm-Up Projects and Layout Design1.1.3.Designing Concepts, Moodboards, Diagrams
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards
1.1.2. Post Production Techniques
1.1.3.Usage of Technology, Stylized Renders
100%
1.1.1.Designing Concepts, Material Boards
1.1.2.Digital Rendering Techniques
1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
1.1.1.Designing 3D Model for AR Integration
1.1.2.Usage of Technology
1.1.3.Research & Benchmark
100%
2.1. Research & Analysis
2.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards
2.1.2.Moodboards
2.2.1.Layout Design & Grid System2.2.2.Visual Language & Graphic Quality2.2.3.Typography, Colour Scheme2.2.4.Hierarchy & Required Data2.2.5.Legibility
100%
3.1.1.Research & Analysis, Brainstorm, Draft Plan
3.2.1.3D/Mesh Model, Structure3.2.2.Materials, Texture, Lighting 3.2.3.Integration Between Softwares & Interconnectivity
3.3. Implementation of Augmented Reality 50%100%
4.1. Research & Analysis4.1.1.Benchmark of Architectural Presentation Boards4.1.2.Moodboards
4.2.1.Layout Design & Grid System4.2.2.Visual Language & Graphic Quality4.2.3.Typography, Colour Scheme4.2.4.Hierarchy & Required Data4.2.5.Legibility
100%
Grading ScaleSignatures
Lect.Egemen Tamcı A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
Final Project (40%)
10%
TOTAL
30%
4.2.Layout Design for Architectural Presentation Board
90%
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental DesignINAR 2290 Visual Presentation Techniques for Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester
Student No
Student Name
Egemen Tamcı (Coordinator)Instructors
TOTAL
3.1.Finding Idea & Designing ConceptsTOTAL
2.2.Layout Design for Architectural Presentation Board
3.2.Preliminary Design for Immersive Technology
Classworks_4 Advanced
Section Rendering (%3)
Classworks_1 Manual
Rendering and integration of Digital Media
Tools (%3)
Evaluation Criteria
Mid-term Project (20%)
Immersive Tech. Project/ Case
Study -Pre-Final (10%)
1.1. Environment Design and Manipulation of Interior Renders
90%
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
100%
Classworks_3 Advanced Floor Plan Rendering
(%3)
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
100%
Classworks_10 Introduction to
Immersive Technology (%3)
Classworks_8 Introduction to Post Production Techniques (%3)
100%
20%
10%
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
TOTAL
1.1. Augmented Reality in Architectural Representation
100%
TOTAL
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
100%
TOTAL
TOTAL
1.1. Layout Design for Presentation Board
100%
TOTAL
Classworks_2 Essentials of Floor Plan
Rendering (%3)
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
100%
TOTAL
100%
TOTAL
Classworks_5 Advanced
Section Rendering
within Time of the day (%3)
Total Term Grade
Classworks_6 Analysis of the Presentation Boards (%3)
1.1. Research & Analysis of Architectural Presentation
100%
TOTAL
EVAL
UAT
ION
TOTAL
Classworks_9 Creating
Diagrams with Collage
Techniques (%3)
1.1. Representation of Interior Architectural Drawings
100%
TOTAL
Classworks_7 Layout Design of
Infographics (%3)
![Page 5: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Grade % Total %1.1. User Profile and Style 5%1.2. Technical Drawings 1/20
1.2.1. Technical Plan 1/201.2.2. Technical Sections and/or Elevations 1/20
1.4.1. Material Information1.4.2. Readibility
15%10%5%
100%3.1. Technical Trip Report 10%
100%3.1. Seminar Report 5%
15%100%
1.1. User Profile and Style 5%1.2. Technical Drawings 1/20
1.2.1. Technical Plan 1/201.2.2. Technical Sections and/or Elevations 1/20
1.4.1. Material Information1.4.2. Readibility
15%10%5%
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
Evaluation Criteria
EVAL
UAT
ION
Participation 20%
Final Submission - Bathroom 40%
55%
1.5. 3D Drawings1.6. Materials and Specifications1.7. Reflected Ceiling Plan (Optional- Bonus)
1.4. Presentation Drawings 1/20
1.5. 3D Drawings1.6. Materials and Specifications
Grading Scale
Midterm Submission - Kitchen 30%
Total Term GradeTOTAL
1.7. Reflected Ceiling Plan (Optional- Bonus)
55%
1.4. Presentation Drawings 1/20
15%
TOTAL
3.2. Critiques taken
Lecturer Işık Örsel İmir (Coord.)
Signatures
15%
TOTAL
Assignment %10 TOTAL
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 3370 - Kitchen and Bath Design 2018-2019 Spring Semester
Student No
Student Name
Lecturer: Işık Örsel İmir (Coord.)Asisstant: İrem Deniz Akçam
Instructors
![Page 6: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Grade % Total %1.1. Drawings
1.1.1. Design Evaluation1.1.2. Sketches
1.2. Drawings and Poster Design1.2.1. Orthographic Drawings&3D drawings
100%2.1. Brand
2.1.1. Concept2.1.2. Logo Motto
2.2.1. Plan2.2.2. Elevations
2.3. 3D Representation2.3.1. Concept2.3.2. Quality
100%
3.1.1. Brand Logo3.2.1. 5 Motto3.2.2. Concept3.2.3. Location/Target Customers
100%
Project II -
Assignment 02 (10%) 4.1.1. Orthographic Drawings
4.1.2. Renders
Project II -
Assignment 03 (10%) 4.2.1. Orthographic Drawings
4.2.2. Renders100%
5.1. Brand/Orthographics/Renders5.1.1. Poster Design
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 3391 Commercial Space and Display Design 2018- 2019 Spring Semester
Student No
Student Name
Hasan Can Kulahcioglu (Coordinator)
Res.Assist.Cemre Cubukcuoglu
Instructors
10%
50%
Lect. Hasan Can Kulahcioglu
4.2. Project II
100%
Signatures
Final (30%)
Total Term Grade
50%
TOTAL
3.1. Project II
Grading Scale
34%
TOTAL
2.2. Orthographic
10%
40%
50%
Evaluation Criteria
EVAL
UAT
ION
Mid Term (25%)
Project II - Assignment 01
(10%)
TOTAL
66%
Project I - Competition
(%15)
TOTAL
TOTAL
4.1. Project II
![Page 7: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Grade % Total %1. Analyses
1.1 site analyses & documentation1.2 research
100%2. survey
2.1 Application of questionnaires & result diag
2.2 survey result assessment /photos
100%3.ınitial Design skecthes
3.1Design ideas & explanation3.2Initial sketcthes of design
100%
4.1.1.User profile & site analyses4.1.2.Report & Survey
4.2.2Anthropometric dimensions4.2.2. User behaviars, needs & design solutlion
4.3. furniture technical drawings4.3.1.site plan4.3.2. ortographic drawings
25%100%
5. Design revision 5.1.Technical drawings &perspective5.2 scaled 3D cardboard model
100%6.1. Project concept
6.1.1.Site analysis & Survey /Report
6.1.2 Explain the design concept& development process- by text & drawings
6.2.project drawings
6.3.1. site plan/ with surrounding & furniture
6.3.2. furniture plan and orthographic drawin
6.3.3. explain and show materials & finishes
6.3.4 installation detail section drawing/ anthr
6.3.5Rendered perspective drawings /use site
60%100%
7.1. Attendance & participation
7.1.Class attendance
7.2 Completeness of classwork & submissions
100%
Total Term Grade
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
Assignmen#4 (10%)100%
TOTAL
4.2. design appraoch
25%
35%4.4. 3Dperspective renders & material suggestion
TOTAL
5%
6.5. 1/1 scale cardboard model
TOTAL
35%
100%
TOTAL
Student Name
4.1. context & user needs
Evaluation Criteria
Assignmen#1 (3%)100%
TOTAL
Assignmen#2 (7%)100%
TOTAL
participation(10%)
final %40
eval
uatio
n
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 4451 Street Furniture Design 2018-2019 Spring Semester
Assignment#3 (5%)
TOTAL
100%
InstructorsStudent No
Lecturer: Rena Vanli Ballar (Coordinator)
midterm (25%)
15%
Signatures Grading Scale
Lecturer: Rena Vanli Ballar (Coordinator)
![Page 8: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
37Grade % Total %
100%100%100%
100%
100%100%100%100%
100%100%100%100%100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
1.1. Name, Logo, Motto, Color Palette Proposal reflecting your vision for your company's corporate identity
70%
1.2. Corporate Web Design and UI Design for Mobile Apps
15%
1.3.
Uniform, Packaging/Gift Item/Invitations/Member pins/Promotional Items etc. - Design according to the companies corporate identity and product selection.
15%
100%
2.1. Representations of the Spatial and Corporate Identity Analysis
15%
2.2.Representations of the Idea Development Process
15%
2.3. Design of the Food Spaces and Experiences 50%
2.4. Presentations and Overall Layout 20%
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
Evaluation CriteriaParticipation
(%10) TOTAL
EVAL
UAT
ION
Classwork_7 (%2.5)
1.1. Research and Analysing of Food Space Concepts
Classwork_8 (%2.5)
1.1. Designing Easter Eggs for the Food Space
Critics (Practice) (%10) TOTAL
Final Exam (40%)
TOTAL
Midterm Exam (20%)
TOTAL
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 4461 Corporate Identity Design2018-2019 Spring Semester
InstructorsStudent No
Lec.Egemen Tamcı (coordinator) Student Name
Classwork_2 (%2.5)
1.1. Designing Corporate Logo TOTAL
Classwork_1 (%2.5)
1.1. Brand Outline, Brand Name and Creative Brief
TOTAL
1.2.Designing stationery set100%
Classwork_3 (%2.5)
1.1. Typography for Corporate IdentityTOTAL
Classwork_4 (%2.5)
1.1. Color Palettes for Branding
TOTAL
TOTAL
Classwork_5 (%2.5)
1.1. Research and Prototype of Corporate Web SiteTOTAL
Classwork_6 (%2.5)
1.1. Static Mockup of WebsiteTOTAL
TOTAL
SignatureLect.Egemen Tamcı
Grading Scale
Total Term Grade
![Page 9: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Grade % Total %
20%100% 25
100% 25
30%
20%
100% 50
100
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
1.2. Accuracy
2.1. Development
2.2. Clarity
2.3. Practice
1.3. Procedure
60%
Evaluation Criteria
EVAL
UAT
ION
2. Project(25%)
3. Final Project(50%)
20%
Grading Scale
1. Homework(25%)
Total Term GradeTOTAL
3.4. Clarity of communication
3.3. Mechanics
25%
25%
1.1. Critical thinking
TOTAL
TOTAL
60%
25%
15%
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coord.)
Signatures
3.1. Experience
3.2. Elements
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 4481 Interiors in Serious Game Design 2018-2019 SpringSemester
Student No
Student Name
Lect. Christopher Ferraris (Coordinator)Instructors
![Page 10: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Grade % Total %1.1. Research
2.1.1.Data Collection2.1.2.Analysis
2.2.1.Building Program-Scenario2.2.2.Diagrams, mood board
1.3. 2D Drawings2.3.1. Plans, sections, elevations
100%
2.1.1. Concept Idea
2.1.1. Plans, sections, elevations-1/50
30%
2.3. Presentation 25%100%
3.1. Desk/panel critics, class works, reflections3.1.1. Completeness of requirements3.1.2. Content
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1
A. Can Aysan
Letter Grades
TOTAL
Total Term Grade
Signatures Grading Scale
2.2. 3D Drawings
TOTALDesk/Panel Critics, Class
Work, Reflections
(homework) (20%)
20%
TOTAL
Project II-Jury 3-Final (50%)
2.1. Project Brief15%
2.1. 2D Drawings30%
Project 1 Mid-term (30%)
30%
1.2.Design Concept30%
40%
Student Name
Evaluation Criteria
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 4484 Yacht Interiors 2018-2019 Spring Semester
InstructorsStudent No
A. Can Aysan
![Page 11: YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of ... · Abstraction of architectural forms, idea development, evaluation of intersection areas between the units, the balance](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022042912/5f4617dc4d7e8e058c30ff9a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Grade % Total %1. Project list
1.1 Project information and images1.2 Project Analyses
100%2. cover page and content
2.1 Page dimension & design2.2Project selection & list order
100%3. Sample project layout
3.1 Layout creativity, types, font selection3.2 project readabilitiy
100%4. Resume
4.1 Design, font selection4.2 Format, information
100%5.1. Page design
5.1.1.Layout types5.1.2.Layout design
5.2.1 Readability5.2.2. Clarity of expression
5.3. Completeness of portfolio5.3.1. Creativiy level5.3.2. Number of projects& pages
15%100%
6.Cover letter & Business card6.1.Business card & logo design 6.2 Firm research & letter format
100%7. Web site design & QR code
7.1 Project types & images7.2 Project and self information
100%8.1. Design & organization
8.1.1.Layout design & types
8.1.2 Font & titles
8.1.3 Readability
8.2. completeness of portfolio
8.3.1. Creativiy
8.3.2. Number of projects& pages
8.3.3. Project text & keywords
15%10%15%
9.1. Attendance & participation
9.1.Class attendance
9.2 Completeness of requirements
100%
A 95-100 4A- 90-94 3,7B+ 85-89 3,3B 80-84 3B- 75-79 2,7C+ 70-74 2,3C 65-69 2C- 60-64 1,7D+ 55-59 1,3D 50-54 1F 0-49 0
25%
30%
Evaluation Criteria
Signatures Grading Scale
Lect. Rena Vanli Ballar
Student Name
YAŞAR UNIVERSITY Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture & Environmental Design
INAR 4490 Portfolio for Interior Architects 2018-2019 Spring
InstructorsStudent No
Lecturer: Rena Vanli Ballar (Coordinator)
TOTAL
Assignmen#4 (4%)100%
TOTAL
midterm (25%)
30%5.2. Articulateness of organization
5.4. Resume /cvTOTAL
Assignmen#5 (5%)100%
TOTAL
Assignmen#6 (4%)100%
TOTAL
final (40%)
30%
30%
8.3. Busines card
8.4. Resume
8.5. Website
TOTAL
participation (10%)100%
TOTAL
Total Term Grade
EVAL
UAT
ION
Assignmen#1 (3%)100%
TOTAL
Assignmen#2 (3%)100%
TOTAL
Assignmen#3 (6%)100%