yoad winter – technion/utrecht (joint work with sela mador-haim – technion/upenn)
DESCRIPTION
Spatial Meaning and Quantification. Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn). April 8, 2008 – Frankfurt. SALT paper downloadable at: www.cs.technion.ac.il/~winter. 2km. 252km. 68km. 137km. Introduction (1): singular indefinites. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht(Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)
Spatial Meaning and Quantification
SALT paper downloadable at: www.cs.technion.ac.il/~winter
April 8, 2008 – Frankfurt
![Page 2: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
""
252km
137km
68km
""We're far from a gas station.
2km
We're close to a gas station.
Introduction (1): singular indefinites
![Page 3: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
""
""The circle is outside the rectangles.
The circle is inside the rectangles.
Introduction (2): plural definites
![Page 4: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
""""
The Bronx borders on the industrial zone.
The Bronx contains the industrial zone.
(part of the zone)
(the whole zone)
Introduction (3): singular definites
![Page 5: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
""""The house is far from lakes.
The house is close to lakes.
Introduction (4): bare plurals
![Page 6: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
The identity of the spatial preposition affects (pseudo)-quantificational effectswith:
- Singular indfinites- Bare plurals- Singular and plural definites
Empirical conclusion
Which mechanisms govern this behavior?
![Page 7: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
[[ outside(the lake) ]] = area outside the eigenspace of the lake
Mechanism 1: Spatial Meaning of Preposition
eigenspace of the lake outside the lake
![Page 8: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
inside the rectangles = eigenspace of the rectangles
insideThe circle is the rectangles
Mechanism 1: Spatial Meaning of Preposition
![Page 9: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
outside the rectangles
outsideThe circle is the rectangles
Mechanism 1: Spatial Meaning of Preposition
![Page 10: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
eigenspace of “a lake” outside a lake
[[ outside(a lake) ]] = area outside the eigenspace of the
property for a lake
Mechanism 2: Semantic Incorporation
![Page 11: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Concentrating on singular indefinites:
There exists a lake X such that the house is close to X
For every lake X the house is far from X
The house is close to a lake/less than 20km from a lake
)1( The house is far from a lake/more than 20km from a lake
)2(
![Page 12: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Questions Which prepositions display non-existential
effects with singular indefinites?Locative and temporalNot upward monotone
Which singular indefinites?Predicative indefinites (a vs. some)
What’s “Semantic Incorporation”?Zimmermann, McNally, Van Geenhoven, and
others: a mechanism that allows predicative (property denoting) indefinites to become arguments of other predicates.
![Page 13: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
More non-existential effects(3) The bird is more than 20m above a cloud
20m
20m
20m
20m
For every cloud X that is below the bird, X should be more than 20m from the bird
Don’t care… Not truly universal
![Page 14: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
More effects (cont.)(4) The dog is less than 5m outside a doghouse
5m
There is a doghouse X such that the dog is less than 5m from Xand for every doghouse Y the dog is outside Y
Hence it is not truly existential
![Page 15: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
More effects (cont.)(5) The house is (exactly) 100m from a lake
100m
There is a lake X such that the house is exactly 100m from Xand for every lake Y the house is at least 100m from Y
![Page 16: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Conclusion from examples There is a broad spectrum of quantificational effects that
are sensitive to the prepositional structure in use(1) The house is close to a lake (existential)
(2) The house is far from a lake (universal)
(3) The bird is more than 20m above a cloud (semi-universal)
(4) The dog is less than 5m outside a doghouse (semi-existential)
(5) The house is (exactly) 100m from a lake (combination) What kind of mechanism can account for the different
quantificational effects in (1)-(5)?
![Page 17: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Proposed solution
A predicative denotation of the indefinite A building: x. building(x)
Locatives take such predicates as arguments semantic incorporation
![Page 18: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Semantic incorporation Motivation: narrow scope of indefinites Obligatory narrow scope:
There sentences (McNally 1992,1998): There isn't a cloud in the sky
Transitive constructions in West-Greenlandic (Van Geenhoven 1998):
John fish-buy-NEG-IND-[tr]-3sg ( / *) Optional narrow scope as opposed to other NPs
(Zimmermann 1993, Van Geenhoven and McNally 2005) John is looking for a dog/every dog
Claim: Also in PPs, non-existential indefinites appear due to narrow scope via incorporation
![Page 19: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Eigenspace semantics (Zwarts & Winter 2000)
Example:outside the lake
loc(the lake)
outside(loc(the lake))
loc-1(outside(loc(the lake)))
loc-1(P(loc(Ce)))
entity
eigenspace function: entities to regions
spatial function :regions to regionsregions to
sets of entities
[ P NPe ]et
![Page 20: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Semantic incorporation of PPs
loc-1(P(loc(Ce)))
Predicative: The house is far from a lakeThe airplane is more than 20m from mountains
loc'(Cet) = xCloc(x)
Entity denoting (Zwarts and Winter):The house is far from some lakeThe bird is more than 50 above every cloud
loc-1(P(loc'(Cet)))
![Page 21: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Incorporation of PPs (cont.)
Example: outside a lake
a lake = {a,b,c}
a
b
c
loc’(a lake)outside(loc’(a lake))
loc-1(outside(loc’(a lake)))
![Page 22: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Quantificational variabilityThe house is close to a lake
The house is close to a lake iff it is close to the union of the eigenspaces of all lakes
It is sufficient that the house is close to some point in some lake (existential)
![Page 23: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Quantificiational variability (cont.)
The house is far from a lake The house is far from a lake iff it is far from the
union of the eigenspaces of all lakes The house needs to be far from all points in the lakes
(universal)
![Page 24: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Quantificiational variability (cont.)The house is exactly 100m from a lake Measure phrases in Zwarts and Winter (2000) take
distance from the closest point. This entails that there is a point in the union of the lakes which is 100m from the house, and that it is among the closest points to the house.
![Page 25: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Quantificiational variability (cont.)
The dog is less than 5m outside a doghouse Less than 5m from the union of the eigenspaces of
the doghouses, and not in that area
![Page 26: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Point monotonicity (Zwarts and Winter)
Which prepositions support existential quantification?
Only upward monotone Ps!P is upward monotone if for all eigenspaces
A,B s.t. A B: x P A x P B.Examples: inside, close to
Similarly, only prepositions that are downward monotone lead to universal interpretationExamples: outside, far from
B
A
x
![Page 27: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Downward Monotonicity – standard tests Downward/Upward entailing environments:
The house is far from a lake The house is far from a small lake
The house is close to a lake The house is close to a small lake
NPI licensing(6) The house is far from/*close to any
lake
Not accounted for if PPs take entity arguments!
![Page 28: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Other PPs Analogous effects with temporal PPs:
(6) This shelter was built less than 2 years after a war
(7) This shelter was built more than 2 years after a war
NPI licensing: before/*after any war Conclusion: temporal PPs can likewise incorporate
their complement Directional PPs do not incorporate (thanks to J.
Zwarts):(8) We went around a lake - (existential only)
Existential
Semi-universal: similar to more than 2 meters above a cloud
![Page 29: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Summary and conclusions Prepositions with indefinite complements exhibit a
wide spectrum of quantificational variability A result of incorporation between predicative
indefinites and prepositions Preposition monotonicity governs existential-
universal variability Monotonicity is also verified by standard tests (NPI
licensing, entailment) Incorporation – a general process with both locative
and temporal prepositions
![Page 30: Yoad Winter – Technion/Utrecht (Joint work with Sela Mador-Haim – Technion/UPenn)](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815d8d550346895dcb9b75/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
ReferencesMcNally, L. 1992. An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction. Ph.D. Diss., UCSC. Published 1997. Garland, New York
McNally, L. 1998. Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 353-392
McNally, L. and V. Van Geenhoven 2005. On the property analysis of opaque complements. Lingua 115, 885-914.
Van Geenhoven, V. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. CSLI Publications.
Zimmermann, T.E. 1993. On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.
Zwarts, J. and Y. Winter 2000. Vector space semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 171-213.