# 3 ppt - expose your hidden problems using visual management
DESCRIPTION
Learn how Visual Management enables you to: See workflow disruption Solve workflow constraints Create continuous flow in the value streamTRANSCRIPT
# 3: Using Visual Management to Expose your Hidden Problems & Waste through Standard Work
Rhonda Kovera is an Industrial Engineer with 25 years of continuous process improvement experience, including the use of visual management, to identify and eliminate waste. Rhonda is CEO of Visual Workplace Inc.
Phil Kirby coaches executives on performance improvement using Visual Management. He has over 25 years of operations management and process improvement experience in all business sectors.
His third book, The Process Mind, is scheduled for release this Fall.
Visual Management Webinar Sponsors
Visual Management Webinar Series
Using Visual Management to…
# 1…improve your business performance.
# 2…optimize your workflow.
# 3…expose your hidden problems & waste through Standard Work.
# 4…build a problem-solving environment and create a culture of continuous learning.
Visual Management: Recap
1. Safety
2. Throughput
3. Cycle-Time
4. Productivity
5. Operating Expense
Visual Management: Recap
Workplace StructureNavigationPresenceOrganization
Process ImprovementIdentificationDocumentationMeasurement
Employee EngagementOwnershipProblem-solvingCommunication
Visual Management: What is Standard Work
Work instructions
Clear, visual,current bestapproach Baseline forimprovements
Visual Management: Why Standard Work
Maintain changes
Reduce variations
Training
Drive C.I.
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
1. Establish Standard > See workflow disruption
2. Monitor Standard > Define variances
3. Problem-solve Variances > Create flow
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
Establish Standard Monitor Standard Problem-Solve Variances
Scheduling Board Run at Rate ChartFishbone Diagram
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Scheduling Board (Material)
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Scheduling Board (Information)
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Scheduling Board (Shipping)
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Reliable Methods
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Shadow Board KanBan Board
Reliable Methods
Sub-Assembly Shipping Procedure
1. 8” and 10” Boots:
1. Place 2 rows of 3 back to back
2. Secure with wire
2. 13” Boots:
1. Place 2 rows of 2 back to back
2. Secure with wire
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Reliable Methods
Baggage Tag PlacementPurpose: To improve the aircraft loading process
Service Agent will assist with the proper placement of the baggage tag on the bag as shown:1) The tag is placed on the handle
located on the short side of the bag
2) The tag is NOT placed on the handle located on the long side of the bag
.
X
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Reliable Methods
Establish Standard: See Workflow Disruption
Reliable Methods
Monitor Standard: Define Variances
Run at Rate Chart
Monitor Standard: Define Variances
Run at Rate Chart
Monitor Standard: Define Variances
Scorecard
Monitor Standard: Define Variances
010
50
Operators
Tim
e (s
econ
ds)
8/31/2004
Scope of Operations
From Kit Delivery Dept. Head Supervisor
Percent Loading Chart Date Preparedor Revised
L. Simpson
Dave W. Dan
To Finished Goods B. Simpson
PartNumber
PartName
Fitting and Wedging
87-RF
Fitted Snorgle
ProcessName
900
750
600
450
300
150
Randy Dave S *
* = I n training** = Supports other areas
Takt Time = 575 secondsCell 435 MinutesLeader 26,100 Seconds Date
40065 Seconds
StepProcess
DescriptionMachine
#
Manual Time
(Secs)
Machine Time
(Secs)
# of pcs per
changeChange
Time
Tool Change
TimeTotal Time
to CompleteProcessing
Capacity Remarks1 Mill 7502 4 65 100 120 1.2 70.2 3712 Drill 6532 3 35 50 75 1.5 39.5 6603 Tap 8405 4 25 200 60 0.3 29.3 8904 Grind 3271 4 85 0.0 89.0 293
Process Capacity FormAvailable Time
Daily DemandTakt Time
Process Tool Change
5 77 95674, 95671
Standard Work In Process
Operator NumberTakt Time(Seconds)
Number of Pieces of Standard Work In Process
Safety PrecautionQuality Check
ProcessName
PartNumber
PartName
Bracket Fabrication
9876-43C
Bracket
Scope of Operations
From
To Finished Goods
Standard Work Sheet
R. Coltrain D. Duke
8/31/2004Date Preparedor Revised
SupervisorDept. HeadRaw Material
MillDrillTap
Grind
Assembly Test Pack
Raw Material
Finished Goods
12345
6
1 2 3 4
5164
Plug
56-AD
Final Machining
Manual Auto Walk Wait
1 5
2 20 20
3 5 5
4 5 5
5 15 15
6 5 5
20 35 15 35 Note:Make sure to account for all the work to be done, including gaging, tool changes, set-up, etc.
N/A
N/A
Takt Time(seconds)
70
Demand Per Shift
Time
395
10:00 AM
Standard Work Combination Sheet
70Total Process Time
Component Totals
Operator removes part from machine
Machine Part
Load part into lathe
Operator removes part from debur machine
Machine debur
Load part into auto debur
90 100
Time (seconds) Operation Working Time (in seconds)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Manual
Automatic
Walking
Wait
Description of Operation
Part Number
Part Name
Work Center
Process Name
Step No.
Date
Prepared By
Kaizen #
Event
8/31/2004
J. John
Date
TOTAL 5S LEVEL:(Lowest of individual audit levels)
Sort (record audit level)
LevelSort Identify & eliminate what is not needed
1234
5
Set in order (record audit level)
LevelSet in Order A place for everything
and everything in its place123
45
Shine (record audit level)
LevelShine An effective, organized environment
12345
Standardize (record audit level)
LevelStandardize Develop standards and stick to them
123
45
Sustain (record audit level)
LevelSustain 5S is a way of life
12345
Comments
Comments
Necessary and unnecessary items are mixed together in the work area.Necessary and unnecessary items are separated.All unnecessary items have been removed from the work area.A dependable, documented method has been established to keep the work area free of unnecessary items.
Waste is immediately visible and triggers a planned response with root cause analysis and corrective action.
Tools, supplies and materials are randomly located.Designated location established for all items as needed.Designated locations are marked to make organization more visible (color, outlines, labels, numbers, etc).
Documented method of visual sweep to identify items out of place or exceeding quantity limits.Defined process to evaluate and improve movement and motion.
Work/break areas and machinery are dirty and disorganized.Work/break areas and machinery are cleaned on a regularly scheduled basis. Key items identified.
Substantial process documentation is available and followed.Everyone is continually seeking the elimination of waste with changes documented and information shared.
Visual Controls are in place for labeling and quantity levels. Machines are cleaned daily. 5S techniques are understood and practiced continually. 5S schedules are posted and followed.Dependable, documented method of preventative cleaning and maintenance.
Work place methods are not consistently followed and are not documented.
Area:5S Audit Sheet
Comments
There is a general appearance of a confident understanding of, and adherence to, the 5S principles.
Work place checks are randomly performed and there is no visual measurement of 5S performance.A recognizable effort has been made to improve the condition of the workplace.5S schedules and safety practices have been developed and are utilized.Follow through with 5S schedules and safety practices is evident.
Methods are being improved, but changes have not been documented.Working environment changes are documented and performed the same by all employees. Visual Controls are in place for labeling and quantity levels.
Name:
Comments
Comments
5S Audit Sheet
Std Work Documents
#
Pareto Chart Item
Root Cause Action Impact Owner
Due Date Status
12345
Acton Item List
#
Pareto Chart Item
Root Cause Action Impact Owner
Due Date Status
12345
Acton Item List
0
5
10
15
20
25
a b c d other
#
Pareto Chart Item
Root Cause Action Impact Owner
Due Date Status
12345
Acton Item List
#
Pareto Chart Item
Root Cause Action Impact Owner
Due Date Status
12345
Acton Item List
Action Items
Month to Date
Pareto
Monthly Measure
CostDeliveryQualitySafety
Metric Tracking
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
OSH
A In
cide
nts
TargetActual Metric Tracking
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
M T W T F S M T W T F S
FPY
TargetActual Metric Tracking
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
OTD
TargetActual
Pareto of Causes
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cut f inger Back injury
OSH
A In
cide
nts
Pareto of Causes
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Burrs Oversized Part 234backw ards
Part 543 loose
Qua
lity
Inci
dent
s
Pareto of Causes
0
2
4
6
8
10
Sick days Rew ork Late to w ork Scrap
Hou
rs lo
st
Metric Tracking
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week
Uni
ts/P
erso
n/H
our
TargetActual
Daily Measure
Metric Tracking
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
OSH
A In
cide
nts
TargetActual Metric Tracking
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
M T W T F S M T W T F SFP
Y
TargetActual Metric Tracking
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
OTD
TargetActual Metric Tracking
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Week
Uni
ts/P
erso
n/H
our
TargetActual
Skills MatrixDate: Aug. 20, 2009Team/Area: Rapture Cell Team/Area Leader: Carl
Skill
Name
1
2
(1 / 2) * 100%
Harry
Bob
Tom
Dick
Legend Total # of skill levels attained:
Total % Skill Attainment 58
93Untrained Learner Practitioner Developer Coach Total # of potential skill levels: 160
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Fishbone Diagram
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Fishbone Diagram
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Fishbone Diagram
Problem Statement
Red Dot Concentration:Indicates high-priority problem
Effect Description
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Andon Lights
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Accountability Board
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Huddle Meeting
Problem-Solve Variances: Create Flow
Job Assignment Board
29
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
Visual Display Room
Fishbone Diagram
Standard Work
Accountability Board
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
Visual Display Room
Fishbone Diagram
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
59
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
II
Coils5 days
ShippingI
I81
202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
Project on67% Yield
1.5 dayorder queue
Eliminate order entry
Kanban KaizenCombine Ops
SupplierKanbanDailyDelivery
EliminateMRP
Eliminate and Ship Direct
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 minFPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shift Cycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
CT > TTUptime 70%TPM
SetupReduction
SetupReduction
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
1414
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
IICoils
5 days ShippingI
I81
202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Qu eue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Deman d = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shift Cycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
2
DAILY SCHEDULEl m A8 - Information Technology Improvements m m m m l m
l A7 - Planning Optimization l ll l A6 - Make vs. Buy Decision Making l l l ml l A5 - Supplier Development l l l m l
l m A5 - Grow Revenue l l m l m mm l A3 - VA/VE l m m l mm l A2 - Reduce Cost of Quality l m l
l A2 - Improve Productivity l m l ml m l A1 - Value Stream Development l l l m m m
Inve
ntor
y T
urn
Ove
r Rat
io o
f 1.8
(50%
in
crea
se w
/flat
sal
es; $
5 m
illio
n de
crea
se)
Flat
sal
es
grow
th v
s. 2
009
($25
mill
ion
gros
s re
v.)
7% O
I lev
el in
201
0 (c
umul
ativ
e fo
r ye
ar)
Redu
ce T
otal
Pro
duct
Cyc
le T
ime
on K
ey V
SM's
by 5
0%
Impr
ove
Tota
l Pro
duct
ivity
(EH/
Tota
l hrs
. wor
ked)
by
25%
Redu
ce C
ost o
f Qua
lity b
y $30
0K in
201
0
Actu
al 2
010
DM C
ost S
avin
gs fr
om V
AVE
proje
cts >
= $5
00k
Mai
ntain
or g
row
200
9 Re
venu
e le
vels
in 2
010
Redu
ce P
urch
ased
Com
pone
nt In
vent
ory
valu
e of
Chi
na s
ourc
ed m
ater
ial b
y 75
%
Redu
ce S
uppl
ier i
ncom
ing
defe
ct ra
te b
y 25
%
$'s re
coup
ed fr
om s
uppl
iers
for M
uelle
r exp
ense
s in
curre
d du
e to
sup
plie
r def
ects
>=
$200
k
Stra
tegic
Sou
rcin
g DM
Cos
t Sav
ings
>=
$500
k
Mak
e 50
k sq
. ft.
of fl
oor S
pace
Ava
ilabl
e fo
r Bu
sines
s G
rowt
h
Phil M
atth
ews
Stev
e Sn
ead
Stev
e Le
derm
ann
Pedr
o
Geo
rge
Ande
rson
Rola
nd A
rago
na
Gina
Rob
erts
Earl
Davi
s
m l Achieve 12% OI profitability levell m Inventory Turn Over Ratio = 5
l Reduce total product cycle time from 300 days to 70
Rev 2_0
Resource Deployment
3-Year FinancialBreakthrough Objectives
Top LevelStrategic Priority
Annual Objectives
Targets toImprove
l Primary Responsibility or Link (type "l")m Secondary Responsibility or Link (type "m")
MuellerTTI Bowling Chart - Strategy Deployment
Target to Improve (TTI) JOP YTD ACT January February March April May June July August September October November December
TTI 300 285 270 255 240 225 210 195 180 165 150 135 Actual 310 320 285 285 250 220 200
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
TTIActual
300
Strategic Sourc ing DM Cost Savings >= $500k
Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Maintain or grow 2009 Revenue levels in 2010
Reduce Purchased Component Inventory value of China sourced materia l by 75%
Reduce Supplier incoming defect ra te by 25%
$'s recouped from suppliers for Mueller expenses incurred due to supplier defects >= $200k
Reduce Total Pr oduct Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%Improve Total Productivity (EH/Total hrs. worked) by 25%
Reduce Cost of Quality by $300K in 2010
Actual 2010 DM Cost S avings from V AVE projects >= $500k
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
nFe
b
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Current Year
$ ImpactAnnual $
Impact (if app)Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to identify main plant value streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland A ragona
1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland A ragona1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support Value Stream waste elimina tion Steve Snead Phil Matthews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste elimination e fforts
Earl Davis Ph il Matthews x
Improve Flow in Fabrication Steve Snead Phil Matthews xEstablish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Phil Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Ka izen Events to support VSM strategy Phil Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Earl DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
n
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Cur rent Year
$ ImpactAnnual $
Impact ( if app)Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to iden tify main p lan t va lue streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland Aragona
1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland Aragona1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support Value Stream waste elimination Steve Snead Phil Matthews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste e limination effo rts
Earl Davis Phil Matthews x
Improve Flow in Fabrication Steve Snead Phil Matthews xEstab lish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Ph il Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Ka izen Events to support VSM strategy Ph il Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Earl DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
n
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Cur rent Year
$ ImpactAnnual $
Impact ( if app)Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to iden tify main plan t va lue streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland Aragona
1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland Aragona1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support Value Stream waste elimination Steve Snead Phil Matthews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste e limination effo rts Earl Davis Phil Matthews x
Improve Flow in Fabrication Steve Snead Phil Matthews xEstab lish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Ph il Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Ka izen Events to support VSM strategy Ph il Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Ear l DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
nFe
bM
arAp
rM
ayJu
nJu
lAu
gSe
pO
ctNo
vDe
c Current Year $ Impact
Annual $ Impact (if app)
Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to identify main plant value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland Aragona1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main va lue streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland Aragona
1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support Value Stream waste e limination Steve Snead Phil Mat thews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste elimination efforts
Earl Davis Phil Mat thews x
Improve Flow in Fabrica tion Steve Snead Phil Mat thews xEstablish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Phil Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Kaizen Events to support VSM st rategy Phil Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. o f floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Ear l DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
nFe
bM
arAp
rM
ayJu
nJu
l
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Current Year
$ ImpactAnnual $
Impact (if app)Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to identify main plant value streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland Aragona
1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland Aragona1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support V alue Stream waste elimina tion Steve Snead Phil Matthews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste elimination e fforts
Earl Davis Phil Matthews x
Improve Flow in Fabrication Steve Snead Phil Matthews xEstablish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Phil Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Kaizen Events to support VSM strategy Phil Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Earl DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Mueller - Continuous ImprovementAction Plan (Macro) - Strategy Deployment
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Owner Assisting Planned Dates Ja
n
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Cur rent Year
$ ImpactAnnual $
Impact ( if app)Create CIOS Deployment Room Phil Matthews 1/15/2010 xConduct VSM workshop to iden tify main p lan t va lue streams
Phil Matthews Steve Snead, Roland Aragona
1/15/2010 x
Conduct VSM workshops create VSM's for main value streams
Phil MatthewsSteve Snead,
Roland Aragona1/30/2010 x
SMED events to support Value Stream waste elimination Steve Snead Phil Matthews xCNC Programming enhancements to reduce change-over time to support VSM waste e limination effo rts
Earl Davis Phil Matthews x
Improve Flow in Fabrication Steve Snead Phil Matthews xEstab lish Kaizen Roadmap for 2010 Ph il Matthews 1/30/2010 xConduct Ka izen Events to support VSM strategy Ph il Matthews x x x x x x x x x x x
Target to Improve
(1) Reduce Total Product Cycle Time on Key VSM's by 50%; (2) Make 50k sq. ft. of floor Space Available for Business Growth
Action Plan
Team Date of Next ReviewPhil Matthews, Steve Snead, Earl DavisFactors to Consider
Strategic Priority Owner DateValue Stream Development Phil Matthews
Strategic Deployment Site Strategic Deployment Matrix
Targets to Improve
Strategic Priorities & Action Plans
Value Stream FocusVSM #1
Current State Future State
59
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
II
Coils5 days Shipping
II
81202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
Project on67% Yield
1.5 dayorder queue
Eliminate order entry
Kanban KaizenCombine Ops
SupplierKanbanDailyDelivery
EliminateMRP
Eliminate and Ship Direct
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shiftCycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 sh ift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
CT > TTUptime 70%TPM
SetupReduction
SetupReduction
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
1414
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Cu stomer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
IICoils
5 daysShipping
II
81202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order En try
Produ ctionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shift Cycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
VSM #2
Current State Future State
59
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
II
Coils5 days Shipping
II
81202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
Project on67% Yield
1.5 dayorder queue
Eliminate order entry
Kanban KaizenCombine Ops
SupplierKanbanDailyDelivery
EliminateMRP
Eliminate and Ship Direct
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 sh iftCycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 sh ift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
CT > TTUptime 70%TPM
SetupReduction
SetupReduction
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
1414
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Cu stomer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
IICoils
5 daysShipping
II
81202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order En try
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shiftCycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
VSM #3
Current State Future State
59
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
II
Coils5 days
ShippingI
I81
202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Queue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
Project on67% Yield
1.5 dayorder queue
Eliminate order entry
Kanban KaizenCombine Ops
SupplierKanbanDailyDelivery
EliminateMRP
Eliminate and Ship Direct
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 sh ift Cycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
CT > TTUptime 70%TPM
SetupReduction
SetupReduction
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
1414
WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Customer
Stamping342
S. Weld # 1
I
I
IICoils
5 daysShipping
II
81202122
Assembly Test
90
90/60/30 dayForecasts
Order Entry
ProductionControl
MRP
6 WEEKForecast
Suppliers
Lead Time - 34 Days
Competitive Lead Time = 3 Days
Orders/day= 36Qu eue = 1.5 Days
SR2
Demand = 900 per month
Takt Time= 593 Seconds
SR
Co=10 min.Uptime=70%
Co=0 min.Uptime=100%2 shifts
Co= 23 min
FPY = 67%
5 days
1 sec
7.6 days 1.8 days 2.7 days 4.5 days 2 days
Lead Time =23.7 days
1 shift Cycle Time = 2861 sec
CT=1secCo=1 hr.Uptime=85%1 shift
CT=180 sec CT= 1200 sec CT= 1240 sec
1 shift
CT= 240 sec
180 sec 1200 sec 1240 sec 240 sec
2
DAILY SCHEDULE
VSM #4
Current State Future State
Kaizen Area: Event Start Date:Faci li tator
Team Leader
Before Kai zen
Kaizen Goal
%Improvement
After K ai zen%
Improvement
1 Month%
Improvement
2 Months%
Improvement
3 Months%
Impro vement
4 M onths%
Improvement
5 Months%
Improvement
6 Months%
Improvement
QUALITY
DE LIV ERY
FINANCIAL IMPACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Da te (Month End)
KAIZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropriate to event)
Primary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFETY
Kaizen
Lean Event Description Site Scheduled Start Date
Scheduled Finish Date Status Lean Leader Event Sponsor Event Leader Inventory Savings P&L Savings
Total P&L + Inventory Savings
Plating Outsourcing Carolinas 2/16/2009 8/7/2009 Complete $ 470,000.00 $ 470,000.00 Epoxy Cell Creation Phase 2 Ames 9/14/2009 9/18/2009 On Going Svensson West Svensson $ 250,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 350,000.00 9D Cell Inventory Kaizen Carolinas 9/17/2009 9/21/2009 Complete $ 126,000.00 $ 126,000.00 Create a high volume "Bagging" COE @ Chesnee - Kaizen (Phase 2) Carolinas 7/13/2009 8/20/2009 Complete $ 43,000.00 $ 43,000.00 800 VAVE Webster 8/6/2009 8/6/2009 Complete Geldermann Jalbert Mullavey $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 Shower Cell Kaizen Event Carolinas 8/31/2009 9/4/2009 Complete $23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 Screen Dept Flow & Scrap Mueller 9/4/2009 9/10/2009 complete Ledermann Robinson Ledermann $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 3" 909 Cell kaizen Webster 8/1/2009 8/30/2009 Moschell Moschell $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 Neptune VA/VE Ames 4/21/2009 7/31/2009 On Going Loya Klopper Ng $ - ACV-SS Star VA/VE Ames 7/7/2009 7/21/2009 Complete Svensson West Ng $ - Epoxy Cell Creation Phase 1 Ames 8/31/2009 9/4/2009 On Going Svensson West Svensson $ - Bath Waste Cell Trim Kit Kaizen Event Carolinas 6/29/2009 8/10/2009 Complete Dowdy Jerch Dowdy $ - Lean 101 training Dormont 7/13/2009 7/13/2009 Complete Smith Mantia Smith/Fennel $ - Lean 101 training Dormont 8/10/2009 8/10/2009 Complete Smith Mantia Smith/Fennel $ - Lean 101 training Dormont 8/13/2009 8/13/2009 Complete Smith Mantia Smith/Fennel $ - Centerline Automation Cell 5S Dormont 8/19/2009 8/21/2009 Complete Nemeth Mantia Bonelli $ - CIOS 1 - Centerline Run at Rate Dormont 8/24/2009 8/28/2009 Complete Smith Mantia Nemeth $ - Lean 101 training Dormont 9/14/2009 9/14/2009 Complete Smith Mantia Smith/Fennel $ - HnH Electronic Kanban Dormont 9/15/2009 9/17/2009 Complete Rouse Mantia Rouse $ - Lean 101 training Dormont 9/24/2009 9/24/2009 Scheduled Smith Mantia Smith/Fennel $ - Watts Lean Daily Mgt System N. Andover 6/29/2009 7/1/2009 Scheduled Sejourne Flanders OTI $ - Domestic Supply Chain Webster 7/15/2009 7/30/2009 Sejourne Nims $ - AGF M1000 -M1011 VAVE Webster 9/1/2009 9/30/2009 Geldermann Mullavey $ - 6s Ramco Washer Webster 9/25/2009 9/25/2009 Complete Sylvester Sylvester $ - BV Nameplate Stamp Press Integration Into assembly cell Carolinas 8/14/2009 8/14/2009 Complete6S Blitz Paint Booth 1 Webster 6/1/2009 7/15/2009 Complete Sylvester Robichaud6S Blitz Paint Booth 2 Webster 8/5/2009 8/5/2009 Complete Sylvester Robichaud719/919 power change Kaizen Webster 8/24/2009 9/9/2009 Complete Geldermann Moschell1 1/4-2 007/009 Cell E&A Webster 9/10/2009 9/15/2009 Complete Geldermann Sargent MoschellRegulator Offline Cells E&A Webster 9/18/2009 9/18/2009 Complete Geldermann Sargent Moschell
Kaizen Calendar
Kaizen Event Target Tracking Sheets
JanuaryKaizen A rea: Event Start Date:
Facil itatorTeam Leader
Before Kaizen
Kaizen Goal
%Improvement
After Kaizen%
Improvement
1 Month%
Improvement
2 Months%
Improvement
3 Months%
Improvement
4 Months%
Improvement
5 Months%
Improvement
6 Months%
Im provement
QUALITY
DELIVERY
FINANCIAL IMP ACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Date (Month En d)
KAIZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropriate to event)
Primary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFETY
FebruaryKaizen Area: Event Start Date:
Facili ta torTeam Leader
Before Kai zen
Kaizen Goal
%Improvement
After K ai zen%
Improvement
1 Month%
Improvement
2 Months%
Improvement
3 M onths%
Improvement
4 Months%
Improvement
5 Months%
Improvement
6 Months%
Improvement
QUALITY
DELIVERY
FINANCIAL IMPACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Date (Month En d)
KAI ZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropriate to event)
Pr imary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFETY
March
Kaizen Area: Event Start Date:
Faci litatorTeam Leader
Before Kaizen
Kaizen Goal
%Improvement
After Kaizen%
Improvement
1 Month%
Improvement
2 Months%
Improvement
3 Months%
Im provement
4 Months%
Improvement
5 Months%
Improvement
6 M onths%
Improvement
QUALITY
DELIVE RY
FINANCIAL IMPACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Date (Mo nth End)
KAIZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropriate to event)
Primary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFE TY
Kaizen Area: Event Start Date:
Faci litatorTeam Leader
Before Kaizen
Kaizen Goal
%Improvement
After K ai zen%
Improvement
1 Month%
Improvement
2 Months%
Improvement
3 Months%
Im provement
4 Months%
Improvement
5 Months%
Improvement
6 Months%
Improvement
QUALITY
DELIVE RY
FINANCIAL IMPACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Da te (Month End)
KAI ZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropriate to event)
Pr imary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFE TY
Kaizen Area: Event Start Date:Faci li tator
Team Leader
Before Kaizen
Kaizen Goal
%Impro veme nt Af ter K ai zen
%Improvemen
t1 M onth
%Improveme
nt2 Months
%Improveme
nt3 Months
%Improveme
nt4 Months
%Improveme
nt5 Months
%Improvemen
t6 Months
%Improvemen
t
QUALITY
DELIV ERY
FINANCIAL IMPACT
COST
GROWTH
Notes
Measurement Due Date (Month End)
KAIZEN EVENT TARGET SHEETEvent Type:
METRICS(Measurements appropr iate to event)
Pr imary Kaizen
Objectives
SAFETY
Visual Display Room
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
Is your Standard Workthe same as it was 6 months ago?
Standard Work Drives Continuous Improvement
1. Establish Standard > See workflow disruption Scheduling Board, Reliable Methods
2. Monitor Standard > Define variances Run at Rate Chart, Scorecard
3. Problem-solve Variances > Create flow Fishbone Diagram, Andon Lights, Accountability Board, Huddle Meeting, Job Assignment Board
VM drives Continuous Improvement through…
Workplace StructureNavigationPresenceOrganization
Process ImprovementIdentificationDocumentationMeasurement
Employee EngagementOwnershipProblem-solvingCommunication
Visual Management Webinar Series
Using Visual Management to…
# 1…improve your business performance.
# 2…optimize your workflow.
# 3…expose your hidden problems & waste through Standard Work.
# 4…build a problem-solving environment and create a culture of continuous learning.
Phil Kirby’s executive coaching program - Managing at the Speed of Sight - enables companies to achieve breakthrough performance improvement using visual management. [email protected]
Visual Workplace products support continuous performance improvement. Ask me about our Sign Shop, a do-it-yourself tool that saves you time and [email protected]
Visual Management Webinar Series Sponsors
Questions and Answers