danaya burnett : founding member of nola debate team; freshman @ siu-e keyonte cobb : founding...
TRANSCRIPT
The Power of DebateChampaign NOLA Debaters
New Optimistic Legacy of AchieversChampaign Central High School
Champaign, Illinois
Welcome and Introductions
DaNaya Burnett: founding member of NOLA Debate Team; freshman @ SIU-E
Keyonte Cobb: founding member of NOLA Debate Team; CDL Adjudicator of the Year; CDF Freedom School Servant-Leader
Vernessa Gipson, MSW: former 21st CCLC Director; NOLA Debate Team founder and co-coach
Charles Rosentel: head coach; Social Studies and Composition teacher
Workshop ObjectivesParticipants will understand: the benefits of competitive academic
debate. Social-emotional skill development Connection to learning standards Post-secondary readiness skills
the basic format for policy debate. strategies for implementing debate-related
activities. how to organize a debate team and prepare
for tournaments. how to provide other debate-related
activities.
Research About Effective Afterschool Programs
When programs or activities include a competitive component, increased engagement may also vary according to how successful a student is at the activity (Feldman & Matjasko, 2005).
Adolescence is characterized by reward-seeking behavior (Galvan, 2010) and the development of higher-level thinking and reasoning skills (Sternberg & Downing, 1982).
Programs that utilize these developing skills may improve educational attainment via increased school engagement.
Participating in a policy debate program and academic achievement among at-risk adolescents in an urban public school district: 1997–2007
Primary finding from this study: Students who participated in the Chicago Debate League were
more likely to graduate from high school and less likely to drop out than students who did not participate in debate. Debaters were significantly more likely to graduate than non-debaters in every risk group.
Debate participation may be an effective tool for maintaining or increasing school engagement even among students most at-risk for dropping out of high school.
Students who participated in debate had significantly higher scores on all sections of the ACT after adjusting for demographic and risk variables.
Debaters were also more likely to reach the college-readiness benchmark on the English, Reading, and Science sections of the ACT even among at-risk students.
More intense participation was associated with better academic performance.
Anderson, S., & Mezuk, B., Participating in a policy debate program and academic achievement among at-risk adolescents in an urban public school district: 1997–2007, Journal of Adolescence (2012), doi:10.1016/ j.adolescence.2012.04.005
Why Urban Policy Debateand why is it good for today’s youth?
Today, 19 urban debate leagues provide competitive policy debate programs to high school and middle school students across the United States, in school districts where 87% of students are minority and 78% are low income.
Urban Debate Leagues have proven to increase literacy scores by 25%, to improve grade-point averages by 8 to 10%, to achieve high school graduation rates of nearly 100%, and to produce college matriculation rates of 71 to 91%.
Common Core Standards and Debate
The 2010 CCS aim to refocus literary education on analysis and evaluation of non-fiction texts and oral communication (i.e., listening, speaking, and presenting) (Porter et al., 2011).
Appendix A, titled “The Special Place of Argument in the Standards,” notes that the Common Core places “particular emphasis on students’ ability to write sound arguments on substantive issues, as this ability is critical to college and career readiness.”
On face, competitive policy debate programs appear to match well with many of the English-language arts and reading objectives outlined in the CCS.
Why In Champaign?
City demographics Consent decree School demographics Student performance (report card data)
› AYP› Graduation
rates› Afterschool
participation
Why Debate and Why Chicago?
Needed to provide academic enrichment services in a nontraditional format› More than cooking, dance, and
sports Opportunity to travel out of the
community› Motivation to join was NOT
academically based Opportunity to meet other
“minority” peers who are academically talented› They have to see to believe
What is Policy Debate?
In competitive academic debate (also called “policy debate”), teams of 2 argue for or against a resolution.
The affirmative team presents a plan that supports the resolution and the negative team argues for the status quo.
When debate teams arrive at tournaments, they must be prepared for any possibility, as they may argue either the affirmative or negative and, by the end of each tournament, will have argued both sides multiple times.
Let’s See How it Works!
http://www.urbandebate.org/video_cpsnow.shtml
Year 1: The Connection to Their Reality
Resolution› Resolved: The United States federal
government should substantially increase social services for persons living in poverty in the United States.
Cases› Katrina› Single Stop› Dream Act› Housing Vouchers
Year 2: Extending Their Worldview
Resolution› Resolved: The United States federal government
should substantially reduce its military and/or police presence in one or more of the following: South Korea, Japan, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Iraq, Turkey.
Cases› Afghanistan/Counter-Terrorism› Japan/Okinawa› South Korea/Ground Troops in ROK› Turkey/Tactical Nuclear Weapons
Year 3: Going Above and Beyond (the Mesosphere)
Resolution› Resolved: The United States federal
government should substantially increase its exploration and/or development of space beyond the Earth’s mesosphere.
Cases› Lunar Mining› Space-Based Missile Defense› Space Colonization› China Cooperation
Essential Life SkillsEnhanced through Debate or Debate Games
Reading Writing Critical thinking
and questioning Public speaking Social-emotional
learning Note taking Teamwork Advocacy
Let’s Practice: Activity 1
Storyteller is a game designed to help students think on their feet, speak fluently, use transitions and avoid verbalized pauses (e.g. um, uh, like, you know).
Roles› Storyteller: Tells ad-lib story according to
words the Wordsmith calls› Wordsmith: Directs the story by calling out
words› Buzzer: Buzzes when Storyteller has
verbalized pause
Let’s Practice: Activity 1 SPAR (SPontaneous ARgumentation) debating
introduces students to academic debate and helps them refine argumentation skills they already possess while motivating them to participate in debate.
Brainstorm resolutions› Resolved: That all public schools should extend their school
day by at least 1 hour› Resolved: That social media websites (including Facebook and
YouTube) should be allowed in school for educational purposes› Resolved: That the Internet has made people lazy and stupid.
Roles› 1A: Affirmative Case and Affirmative Closing Statement › 2A: Affirmative Rebuttal › 1N: Negative Case and Negative Closing Statement › 2N: Negative Rebuttal
How SPAR Debating Works
The Case should consist of 3 main arguments, distinct from each other, that are supported by whatever reasoning (or "warrants"), evidence, data, and analysis that you can devise.
The Rebuttal should be refutations of the other team's Case and should include a point-by-point refutation of their 3 arguments.
The Closing Statement should be an extension of the 1 or 2 strongest arguments from your Constructive, with a final rebuttal of your opponent's arguments, concise and synthesized.
SPAR Debating Structure
Affirmative Constructive (1A): 2.5 minutes
Negative Constructive (1N): 2.5 minutes Negative Rebuttal (2N): 2.5 minutes Affirmative Rebuttal (2A): 2.5 minutes Negative Closing Statement (1N): 2
minutes Affirmative Closing Statement (1A): 2
minutes
Long-Term Benefits
100% graduation rate 100% college enrollment DaNaya’s scholarship accomplishment Keyonte’s award and speech
Links You Might Like
Multiple relevant links are posted here:
http://wp.me/p3ylC-Lf