*hqhudo ri wkh 6wdwh ri 1hz

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra and California State Water Resources Control Board[Additional Plaintiffs and Counsel listed on Signature Page]

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of New York

Case 3:20-cv-03005-RS Document 30 Filed 05/18/20 of 56

All. for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell

Amoco Prod. Co. v. Village of Gambell

Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Bauer v. DeVos

Betchart v. Department of Fish & Game

Bresgal v. Brock)

Cal. Dep’t of Parks & Recreation v. Bazaar Del Mundo Inc.

Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric.

Califano v. Yamasaki

California v. Azar

Chalk v. U.S. Dist. Court Cent. Dist. Cal.

Chem. Waste Mgmt., Inc. v. Hunt

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC

City of Arcadia v. U.S. EPA

City of Milwaukee v. Illinois


Encino Motorcars, LLC. v. Navarro

EPA v. California ex. rel. State Water Resources Control Bd

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Fox TV

Genuine Parts Co. v. EPA

Hodel v. Virginia Surface Min. & Reclamation Ass’n., Inc.

Int’l Paper Co. v. OuelletteOuellette

Kansas v. United States

Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr v. Thompson

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.State Farm

Mullins v. City of New York

Nat’l Ass’n. for the Advancement of Colored People v. Trump

Nat’l Cotton Council of Am. v. EPA

Nat’l. Mining Ass’n. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs

Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv.

NRDC v. Costle


Office of Communic’n of the United Church of Christ v. FCC

Oklahoma ex rel. Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co

Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

Rapanos v. United Statespassim

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

S.A. v. Trump

Shanty Town Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. EPA

Sierra Club v. City of Colo. Springs

Sierra Club v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs

Texas v. EPA

The Wilderness Society v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Trump v. Int’l Refugee Assistance Project

U.S. v. Ashland Oil & Transp. Co.Ashland Oil

United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.


Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch

Washington v. Trump

Wickard v. Filburn

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.

passim

passim

passim


A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972


Resource and Programmatic Assessment for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”

Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States

SAB Review of the Draft EPA Report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, Letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy


Connectivity of Streams and Wetland to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence available at

passim

Technical Support Document for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States

available at


The Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States ”

et seq.

See

See


United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.

et seq.


Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v.

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., State Farm

Organized Village of Kake v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture

see also FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., Fox

TV

See Encino

Motorcars, LLC. v. Navarro


Id.

Id

See

Arkansas v.

Oklahoma,

e.g.

Id.

Id.

see Int’l Paper Co. v.

Ouellette, Ouellette


NRDC v. Costle,

See U.S. v. Ashland Oil & Transp. Co., Ashland Oil

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook


County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs SWANCC Rapanos v. United

States, . SWANCC

Id.

SWANCC SWANCC

Rapanos

Id.

Id.

Id

Id.

Id.

Rapanos Rapanos Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the U.S.

Supreme Court’s Decision in Rapanos v. United States & Carabell v. United States

Rapanos


Id.

Id.

Id.

The Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States ”

Id. Rapanos

See id.

Connectivity of Streams and Wetland to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence available at


SWANCC Rapanos

SWANCC Rapanos Id.

Rapanos

Rapanos

See

id. compare

with


Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch

Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.

All. for the Wild Rockies v.

Cottrell

Id.

See Texas v. EPA,

Bauer v. DeVos,

Encino Motorcars, LLC.


Fox TV

Id

See

Id. see


See Technical Support Document for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of

Waters of the United States

Id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

see

See


Id.

10 See also


Id.

See

Id.

lack

Id.

see

See SAB Review of the Draft EPA Report Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, Letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy


Id.

See

State Farm

Genuine

Parts Co. v. EPA

objective

. See,

id.

Nat’l Cotton


Council of Am. v. EPA, see also Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr v.

Thompson,

Office of Communic’n of the United Church of Christ v. FCC,

see e.g id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

Resource and Programmatic Assessment for the Navigable Waters Protection Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States”


Id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

ee


Id.

Id.

See

id.

Id.

Id.

Id.


see

see id

see id.

Id.Id


See

See California v. Azar

Encino Motorcars, LLC.

See S.A. v. Trump

See Nat’l Ass’n. for the

available at


Advancement of Colored People v. Trump

Rapanos Rapanos

Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC

The Wilderness Society v.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Chevron

Id Chevron

Id. Chevron

Rapanos

Rapanos

IdRapanos

Id.

See id.


Rapanos

Rapanos

Rapanos

Chevron

Rapanos

Rapanos

Id


Id

Id.

Id.

Id.

Id.

Id

Id.

Id.

Rapanos

Rapanos


Rapanos

Rapanos

Rapanos

i.e.

Id.

Rapanos

See id.

See, e.g. Rapanos

Rapanos

Id. Rapanos

Rapanos


See Rapanos

Id.


Id.

A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972

EPA v.

California ex. rel. State Water Resources Control Bd

Ouellette

. see also City of Arcadia v. U.S. EPA

See City of Milwaukee v. Illinois


See Rapanos,

See

planning

See

See Shanty Town Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. EPA


Rapanos

Rapanos,

Rapanos

SWANCC

SWANCC

See id SWANCC

See, e.g., Chem. Waste

Mgmt., Inc. v. Hunt

Wickard v. Filburn,

Rapanos Oklahoma ex rel.

Phillips v. Guy F. Atkinson Co Hodel v.

Virginia Surface Min. & Reclamation Ass’n., Inc.


Ashland

Oil

interstate waters

See


City of Milwaukee

not merely another law ‘touching interstate waters

City of

Milwaukee

See

See Ouellette Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Ouellette

Arkansas

federal


Amoco Prod. Co. v. Village of Gambell

see Cal. ex rel. Lockyer v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric.

Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv.,

Sierra Club v. City

of Colo. Springs

threat

Mullins v. City of New York

Kansas v. United States


Id.Id. ¶IdId. ¶Id. ¶Id.Id. ¶Id.


Id.Id.Id.

Id


Sierra Club v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Rural

Utilities Service

see also

Id


see


IdId.

Id


Id.


Id.

Id.

Betchart v. Department of Fish & Game


Amoco Prod. Co., Cal. ex

rel. Lockyer,

See Winter

.

Id


Chalk v. U.S. Dist. Court Cent. Dist. Cal.

Rapanos Rapanos

See Cal. Dep’t of Parks & Recreation v.

Bazaar Del Mundo Inc.

Califano v. Yamasaki

Bresgal v. Brock ); see Trump v. Int’l Refugee Assistance

Project


Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v.

U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, cert. granted,

see also Nat’l. Mining Ass’n. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs

Washington v. Trump

Ashland Oil


Attorneys for Plaintiffs State of Californiaand the California State Water Resources Control Board


admitted pro hac vice





Application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming.


*hqhudo ri wkh 6wdwh ri 1hz

Documents