© imperial college londonpage 1 loft-style apartments: new spatial and psycho-social boundaries...
TRANSCRIPT
© Imperial College LondonPage 1
Loft-style Apartments:New Spatial and Psycho-social Boundaries
Ritsuko Ozaki
IAPS 2004, Vienna, 7-10 July
© Imperial College LondonPage 2
Introduction
• The relationship between the design of the physical environment and human behaviour
• Culture mediating the effect of physical design on behaviour
• Culture:– A system of shared meanings– Governs the way we behave – Classification system – conceptual boundaries –
classification of a space
© Imperial College LondonPage 3
Boundaries and meanings
• Spatial/physical and psycho-social boundaries
• Boundaries:– Classification systems = cultural norms– Underlying conceptual boundaries on which we act
and behave– Socially and culturally constructed
• Exploration of boundaries – understanding cultural meanings
© Imperial College LondonPage 4
Loft-style flats
• Previous work – cultural influence on physical design of house– Separate rooms – separate roles (Victorian middle-
class culture)
• New house type with open-plan layout (since mid-’90s)
• Zukin (1982)– Aesthetic components to the popularity: artists
ambience, authenticity and historic aura– Open floor plan– Space itself
© Imperial College LondonPage 5
Loft-style flats – before conversion
© Imperial College LondonPage 6
Loft-style flats – after conversion
© Imperial College LondonPage 7
Loft-style flats - buildings
© Imperial College LondonPage 8
Methodology
• Definition of lofts
• Fieldwork in the City Fringe and Isle of Dogs, London
• 32 owner-occupiers
• Semi-structured interviews on housing history, daily routines, etc.
• Transcribed and coded for NVivo
• IPA (Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis)
© Imperial College LondonPage 9
Findings and discussion – space
• A Sense of space– Expression of individuality – Creation of own living environment
• Something different from traditional houses
• Physical design helps to express ‘self’
© Imperial College LondonPage 10
Findings and discussion – open-plan
• Inclusive and communicative relationships– Communication, interaction and ‘being in touch’– Not to be excluded– Entertaining– Bringing up children
• Design facilitates the way people want to live
• But not for everyone
• Layout reflects the way people live– Choose a layout that helps to achieve goals –
values/norms set the boundaries
© Imperial College LondonPage 11
Findings and discussion – closed space
• 4 levels of psycho-social boundaries (a sense of privacy)– Strict boundaries (2 bathrooms)– Use according to purposes (2 bathrooms)– Convenience (2 bathrooms)– Not the first priority (1 bathroom)
• Values and norms influencing the use and shape of domestic space
© Imperial College LondonPage 12
Findings and discussion – non-residential blocks
• Living in the non-residential building– Crossing the boundary of ‘residential’ and ‘non-
residential’– Uniqueness and distinctive experience– A sense of history– The contrast of ‘old’ and ‘new’
• The oldness does not sell on its own –crossing the temporal boundary adds appeal
© Imperial College LondonPage 13
Conclusion
• Loft-style flats – paradox, crossing boundaries
• Cultural influence – values and norms determine the way space is shaped and used
• Physical design – facilitating the way people want
• Design drawn on good understandings of cultural factors – great effects on human behaviour
• Next step – urban locality