lost millions of dollars on the project. critics of the ibot — marketed as a stair- climbing...

20

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 2: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 3: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 4: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 5: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 6: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 7: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 8: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 9: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 10: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 11: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 12: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 13: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 14: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 15: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 16: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 17: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 18: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 19: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair
Page 20: lost millions of dollars on the project. Critics of the iBOT — marketed as a stair- climbing wheelchair — point out that many wheelchair users would have used the power chair