//________________________________//

--

ak-taweel@yahoo.com-

.

.

.:

.

.:

.

.

The Ability of Applying Total Quality Management in Mosul UniversityA Study of Selected Group in Different Colleges

Dr. Akram A. AL-TaweelAssistant Professor

Dept. of Industrial management

Faris Y. AL-KoraniAssistant Lecturer

Technical Institution

ABSTRACT

The concept of total quality management has attracted the attention of differentmanaging levels in general; such as organizations of higher education that is, because of theimportance of quality which are among competitive weapons, through which theorganization insures a bigger marketing share.

] [/)(

Through a theoretical review and an operational fulfillment in our University Collegesand specifically Mosul University Colleges at present, we indicated the theoretical gap inTQM philosophy & the application on the organizations of higher education.

Here, the project aims at presenting theoretical features for the College’s management,under discussion, about the concept and the prerequisites, in addition to providing the basicrequirements for the total quality management of application to the Colleges, underdiscussion.

Generally, the project tries to answer the following questions:1. Do the Colleges’ managements, under discussion, have any idea on the concept of

total quality management and their aims?2. Are there any basic requirements about the ability of applying Total Quality

Management Requirements in the Colleges, under discussion?The project has reached a number of conclusions, the most important was:In Colleges environment, under discussion, the availability of basic requirements for

adopting the Total Quality Management, so it is suitable for fulfillment from the people’spoint of view of the, under discussion. Depending on these conclusions, a number ofrecommendations were presented.

.

.

.

...][

:-

.:

.

.

-:

. .

. .

-:

) (

:.

.....

] [/)(

..

..

..

-

)*(

-:

*-:-.-.-.-.

*-:- .-.-.

*-.-.

:-

)*(

...][

:

.. ) -( "

".

.. ) -(

" " . .

.

. )-( " ".

. ) (

.. )-( "

:".

.

. ) ( " )( "

] [/)(

.

.

.. )Rieley,1992( " ".

..)Seymour, 1993,244-266("

". 21

.. (Evangelista.,1995) "

". 27

. :

.

.. )Freed,et.al,1997,107-119( "

". .

:

.

...][

.)Lewis and Smith,1997,259-260(" ".

. :

.

.

-

.

)Asher,1996,18(

)Helge,1997,19( . )Robert,1998,766(

. )(

] [/)(

. ) (

)( . )

-(

. ) -(

. BQA

)www.haho.com/book .( BSI

.)www.quality.com/book .( Herrera

)www.tamuce.edu/newstu.htm/soul(.

) (

. ) (

.

...][

.

-

. .

)Evans,1997,45(

)Arnold, 1998, 417(

;

. )

-(

. )(

)( ) (

. )(

.

] [/)(

)

(

.

-

)Heizer andRender, 1996, 98(

. )Nahmias,1997,700(

.)(

.

:(Russel and Taylor, 1995, 93)(Goetsch and David,1997,13-17)

)27,2000,et al,Haksever()395,2004,Lawrence andThomas()com.report/ISO.www()com.unaipudlishring.www(

;

.:

.(Roth and Jackson, 1995, 399)

. (Krajewki and

...][

Ritzman,1999, 321) .

)www.Iejs.com(

.)Hedhtts, 2000, 77(

P.D.C.A (Plan ,Do, Check, Action)

. (Chaffen and

Sherr,1992, 41-52)

. (Lewis and Smith,1997, 259-260)

. )-(

.

.

.

%25

)www.Org/report.net(. )Lawrence and Thomas,2004, 399(

. )Rieley,1992,191-203(

] [/)(

.) -(.

) ( .

.

.

.)Wern and Voich,1994, 471(

. )www.darwael/indix/com(

. ) (

. )(

.

. )-(

. )

-(

...][

.

.

. )(

. ) (

. )( .

(Hazzard, 1993, 61-75)

. ) -(

. (Freed, et al ,1999,1047-119)

. ) (

.

.

.)Samuel, et.al,1995,1999(

] [/)(

)(

. )www.ISO/report.com(

. )

( . )

(

.)Lewis and Smith ,1997, 18-19(

.

) -(

.(Freed, et

al,1997, 107) .

.

. )(

. (Goetsch andDavis,1997,16)

.(Ross, 1995, 122)

...][

.)www.uhaipablishing.com(

. ) (

. (Theomas and Laurence, 2004,

397) .

) -(

. ) (

.

.

:

-

.

] [/)(

)*(

)(

.1963----

-

---

.1963------

.1964---

------

---

.1966---------

---

.1968---

-----

.1975

-------

---

---

.1976---

--

---

.1983-

-----

.1983-

---

.1992--

--

.1993–-

)*(.

...][

.1999------

.2002--

)*(

- .

- .

- .

- .

• .•

.•

.•

.

-

) ( %

) () ()()()()Seymour,1991(

(Chaffee and Sherr, 1992))Hazzard,1993((Lewis and Smith, 1997)

.

)*(-//

] [/)(

.

%

.8562.5

.7685.7

.12866.7

.121083.4

.9777.8

.131292.3

.1010100

.88100

.33100

.55100

.44100

.77100

.44100

1028987.3

14.6% 82.1% 57.3%

.

%%%1314.62528.15157.3

...][

%%1011.27988.8

88.8% 11.2%

.

%%%1516.96067.41415.7

83.1% )(

.

10-120-1130-2140-31%%%%

910.13320.214247.1855.61

89.9% 10

.

-

] [/)(

. . :

.: )X10-X1( %94.4

)X1(4.50.7 .

) -( .

%85.4

)X2(4.00.8 %87.6

)X3(4.290.77 . ) -(

.

%85.5 )X5(4.26

0.85 . ) ( . %82

)X6(4.220.82 . )

( . %82

)X7( 4.040.84

.80.7

)X8(4.240.87 . (Chaffee andSherr,1992,41-52)

...][

. %84.9

)X9(4.270.75 . ) -(

.

.

. : )X17-X11 .( %73

)X11(4.020.89 .

)Rieley,1997,191-203(

. %70.1 ) (

)X12(3.920.89 .)(

.%81.8

. )X`13(4.120.79 .

)-( )(

)( . %55

. )X14(3.481.06 . %58.4

] [/)(

)X15(3.570.59

.%53.9 ) (

)X16(3.420.99 .

) -(

. %59.5 .

) (

.

. : )X23-X18 .( %86.5

)X18(4.190.78 .

) (

. %88.7

)X19(4.250.77 . %82

)X20(4.150.79 .

)

(. %80.9

)X21(4.020.90 . %66.3

.

)X22(3.761.08 .

...][

)-( . %68.6

)X23(3.761.08

. (Lewis and Smith , 1997,256-260)

.

.

. : )X28-X24(. %79.9

)X24(3.761.08 .

) -(

. %86.5 .

)X25(3.98 0.69 . )Hazzard,1993,61-75(

. 67.3%

)X26(3.67 0.99 . 74.1 % .

)X27(3.810.88 . 68.5% .

)X28(3.790.98 ) –(

] [/)(

.

.. :

)X34-X29 .( %82

)X29(4.010.80 . )Lewis and Smith , 1997,259-260(

. %74.1

)X30(3.910.86 . ) -(

. %65.1

)X31(3.650.98 . )Freed, et-al, 1997,107-119(

. %79.7

)X32(3.890.85 . %90.9

)X33(4.340.67 . 91%

)X34(4.170.74.

...][

.

. : )X41-X35 .( %84.2

)X35(4.060.87.

)Chaffee and Sherr,1992 ,41-52(

.88.8 %

) .X36(

4.200.82 .75.3 %

)X37(3.970.88 . )-(

. 73 %

)X38(3.860.87 . %53.9

(X39)3.471.07 . %66.2

.3.68 (X40)1.11

. )-(

. %58.4

3.61 (X41)1.01.

] [/)(

.

.

:

. .

. .

. :

- )

(.-

.

-

.-

...][

.

-

.-

. .

:.

.

.

..

. .

.

..

:

] [/)(

- ) (

.-

.-.-.-

.-

..

. . )(

. .:

- .

- .

-.-.

-." : "

.. "

" .

. " : -".

...][

. " "

..

..

2000 -2001..

.

. .

. .

. ) (.

. " "

. .

) ( .

. " "

. . TQM

i .

. " "

. .

)( -//.

. .

.

] [/)(

.

. :

. .

. .

. .

. . :

.

-1. Arnold , J.R Introduction To Materials Management ,3rd.ed , Prentice – Hall

International , Inc ,New Yeresy 1998.2. Asher , M. ,Managing Quality In The Service Secov, Ltd , St , Iven Pic England , 1996.3. Chaffee, E and Sheer, A, Quality Transforming Postse Condary Education , Cupa –

Journal , Vol. 43 , No21 , 1992 .4. Evangelists, A, The Impact of The Quality Movement In Public Education on The

Improvement of Curriculum and Instruction Through Total Quality ManagementPractices, Ph.D. , Dissertation , Ston , Hall University , U.S.A, 1995.

5. Evans, J.R., Production / Operation Management Quality Performance And Value, 5th –ed , West Publinhing Co , New York, 1997 .

6. Freed, J and Others, “Implementing The Quality Principles In Higher Education“,Higher Education , Vol.38 , No.2 , 1997 .

7. Goetsch , D . L. and D avid, S. B, Introduction To Quality Management For ProductionProcessing and Services, 2th-Ed., Prentice Hill, Inc, U.S.A, 1997.

8. Haksever, C., Service Management and Operation, 4th. Ed , Prentice-Hall, New Gersey,2000.

9. Hazzard ,T. , The Strengths and Weaknesses Of Total Quality Management In HigherEducation, direction For Institutional Research, No71, TQM In Higher Education,Vol18 , No31 , 1993.

10. Hedhtts.R , “Quality Lessons From Americans Balding Winners“ , Business Horizon,vol 36 ,No3 , May – Jane , usa , www.Jhpin . com , 2000 .

11. Heizer , J, and Render . B, Production and Operations Management , Strategic andTactical Decisions , 4th .Ed , Prentic-Hill , Inc . , New Jersey, 1996 .

12. Heizer ,J, and Taylor,Operation Management, 3th.Ed, Prentice-Hall , Inc , U.S.A,2000 .13. Herrera , S.J , Total Quality Management ? WWW.tamuce. edu /new stu.htm / soul14. krajewskigl.,and Ritzman, L., Operation Management :Strategy and Analysis, 4Th.Ed ,

Addison- wesely Publihing , USA, 1999.15. Lawrence and Thomas, Evaluating The Deming Management Model of Total Quality

in Service Journal Decision Sciences, Vol 35, No3 , USA, 200416. Lewis, G,and Smith, H, Why Quality Improvement, In Higher Education ,

International Journal , Vol 1 , 1997.

...][

17. Nahmias , S., Production and Operations Analysis, 3 rd . Ed , Mc Graw- Hill Co. ,USA, 1997.

18. Rieley, J. , Total Quality Management In Higher EducationHigher Education, vol 16,No2 , 1997

19. Roth, A., and Jackan , W. , Strategic Determinants Of Service Quality and PerformanceEvidence From The Banking Industry , Management Science , Vol 41, 1995.

20. Russell, R.S and Taylor , B.W, Production and Operation Management , Prentic – Hall, USA ,1995.

21. Samuel , C.P and Edward, The Strategic Management Process, 3rd.ed, McGraw – Hill,Inc, USA, 1995

22. Seymour, Donuel,T, and Collot ,Casey,Total Quality Management in Higher EducationCritical Assessment Research Technical ,U.S.A. , 1991

23. Thomas , J.D and Lawrence, D-F, Evaluating The Deming Management Model OfTotal Quality In Service , Journal Decision Sciences , Vol 35, No3 , USA, 2004

24. Wern , D, and Voich , D.J, Management Process Structure and Behavior , 3rd.Ed NewYork , 1994.

25. (www. haho . com/ book)26. (www. quality . com/ book)27. (www. Iso/report. com)28. (www. Iejs . com)29. (www. Uhaipudlisring . com)30. (www. Darwael/indix /com)31. (www. uhaipablihing .com)